Next Article in Journal
Identification of Novel Sphydrofuran-Derived Derivatives with Lipid-Lowering Activity from the Active Crude Extracts of Nocardiopsis sp. ZHD001
Previous Article in Journal
Discovery and Validation of Circulating microRNAs as Biomarkers for Epileptogenesis after Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury–The EPITARGET Cohort
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Inorganic–Organic Hybrid Framework Composed of Polyoxotungstate and Long-Chained Bolaamphiphile

1
Department of Chemistry, School of Science, Tokai University, Kanagawa 259-1292, Japan
2
Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Engineering, Tokai University, Kanagawa 259-1292, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(3), 2824; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032824
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 24 January 2023 / Accepted: 30 January 2023 / Published: 1 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Science)

Abstract

:
Surfactants are functional molecules utilized in various situations. The self-assembling property of surfactants enables several molecular arrangements that can be employed to build up nanometer-sized architectures. This is beneficial in the construction of functional inorganic–organic hybrids holding the merits of both inorganic and organic components. Among several surfactants, bolaamphiphile surfactants with two hydrophilic heads are effective, as they have multiple connecting or coordinating sites in one molecule. Here, a functional polyoxotungstate inorganic anion was successfully hybridized with a bolaamphiphile to form single crystals with anisotropic one-dimensional alignment of polyoxotungstate. Keggin-type metatungstate ([H2W12O40]6−, H2W12) was employed as an inorganic anion, and 1,12-dodecamethylenediammonium (C12N2) derived from 1,12-dodecanediamine was combined as an organic counterpart. A simple and general ion-exchange reaction provided a hybrid crystal consisting of H2W12 and C12N2 (C12N2-H2W12). Single crystal X-ray structure analyses revealed a characteristic honeycomb structure in the C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystal, which is possibly effective for the emergence of conductivity due to the dissociative protons of C12N2.

1. Introduction

Surfactants are functional molecules utilized in various situations by humans [1,2,3]. Surfactants form several self-assembled structures, such as vesicle, rod, or lamellar structures. Washing function is known to be derived from the formation of surfactant vesicles in solution. These self-assembled structures can be transferred into a solid state to obtain well-ordered nanometer-sized architectures [4]. Utilizing charged surfactants enables the buildup of architectures with charged inorganic species; the optimized combination of the charged species leads to functional inorganic–organic hybrid materials.
Bolaamphiphile surfactants have two hydrophilic heads in one molecule, and are effective components for the preparation of hybrid materials with inorganic species due to their multiple connection or coordination sites [5,6,7]. Inorganic polyoxometalate (POM) anions are promising candidates as an inorganic counterpart owing to their characteristic redox functions [8,9,10,11]. Inorganic–organic POM-surfactant hybrid materials [12,13,14,15,16,17,18] and crystals [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27] have been extensively investigated; however, bolaamphiphile surfactants have rarely been hybridized with POM anions [28,29,30,31,32,33]. Additionally, long bolaamphiphiles with methylene groups ≥7 have rarely been hybridized with POMs; hybridization has been limited to POMs consisting of vanadium [34] and molybdenum [35,36,37,38].
Here, we report an inorganic–organic hybrid crystal consisting of polyoxotungstate (tungsten POM) and a long bolaamphiphile cation with 12 methylene groups. Keggin-type metatungstate anion ([H2W12O40]6−, H2W12, Figure 1a) and dodecamethylenediammonium ([H3N(CH2)12NH3]2+, C12N2, Figure 1b) derived from 1,12-dodecanediamine were employed as inorganic and organic motifs, respectively. A hybrid crystal of C12N2-H2W12, the first example of tungsten POM with a long bolaamphiphile obtained as single crystals, was synthesized using a simple and general ion-exchange reaction. C12N2-H2W12 possessed a characteristic one-dimensional architecture derived from the honeycomb arrangement of the H2W12 anions. The conductivity of C12N2-H2W12 was investigated under low- and high-humidified conditions near room temperature.

2. Results

2.1. Syntheses of C12N2-H2W12 Hybrid Crystal

Hybrid crystals of C12N2-H2W12 were synthesized using three different procedures, depicted in Scheme 1. The “Route 1” method (Scheme 1a) was an ion-exchange reaction (utilizing a concentrated solution of sodium salt) of H2W12 anions (Na-H2W12) and C12N2 cations derived from 1,12-dodecanediamine, which yielded ~90% colorless crystalline precipitate of C12N2-H2W12. Recrystallization of the C12N2-H2W12 precipitate from water or organic solvents was not successful. In “Route 2” (Scheme 1b), using diluted solutions of H2W12 and C12N2, only a small amount of precipitate was obtained, and colorless plate crystals were grown from the resulting clear filtrate. Although some single crystals were subjected to X-ray diffraction measurements for structural analysis, only the positions of the H2W12 anion and part of the C12N2 cation could be determined (see below). The whole molecular and crystal structures of C12N2-H2W12 were revealed using single crystals obtained via “Route 3” (Scheme 1c), which utilized decatungstoeuropate anions ([EuW10O36]9−, EuW10) [39]. Sodium salt of the EuW10 anion (Na-EuW10) was employed as a starting material under hydrothermal conditions, and decomposed during heating to form a mixture of colorless plate crystals of C12N2-H2W12.
The products obtained using “Route 1”, “Route 2”, and “Route 3” exhibited almost identical infrared (IR) spectra (Figure 2b–d), showing characteristic peaks of H2W12 in the range of 400–1000 cm−1 (910–980 cm−1 [νas(W=Ot)], 840–910 cm−1 [νas(W-Ob-W)], and 680–840 cm−1 [νas(W-Oc-W)], respectively) [40]. The peaks of C12N2 (2800–3000 cm−1 [νas(-CH2-)]) were simultaneously observed [41], demonstrating the successful hybridization of the H2W12 anion and the C12N2 cation.
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns obtained using “Route 1” and “Route 2” (Figure 3a,b) were similar to that calculated from the crystal structure of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 3” (Figure 3c). This indicates that the C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystals from “Route 1” and “Route 2” were obtained as pure phases having the same molecular and crystal structures as those of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 3” (see below).

2.2. Crystal Strucure of C12N2-H2W12 Hybrid Crystals

Colorless plate crystals of C12N2-H2W12 suitable for single crystal X-ray diffraction were obtained using “Route 3” as a mixture with brown precipitate. The chemical formula was determined as [H3N(CH2)12NH3]3[H2W12O40]·4H2O together with CHN elemental and IR spectroscopic analyses (Table 1). Three C12N2 cations (2+ charge) and one Keggin-type H2W12 anion (6− charge) were associated to neutralize the net charge of the compound. Water molecules of crystallization were also comprised in the crystal lattice of C12N2-H2W12; however, Eu3+ contained in the starting material was not included (see Section 3).
The crystal C12N2-H2W12 exhibited a distinct honeycomb-like structure along the c-axis (Figure 4a). In this honeycomb-like arrangement, the H2W12 anions formed a one-dimensional chain structure with water molecules of crystallization (1D H2W12-H2O chains, Figure 4b) via O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds [42]. The O⋯O distances were 2.79–3.18 Å (mean value: 2.99 Å) between the H2W12 anion and water molecule, and 3.05 Å between water molecules. These 1D H2W12-H2O chains extended along the c-axis, separated by the complicatedly bent C12N2 cations (Figure 4c), resulting in the honeycomb-like arrangement along the c-axis. The honeycomb-like arrangement of the H2W12 anions was confirmed in the crystals obtained using “Route 2” (Figure S1), while only the positions of H2W12 anions and some carbon atoms were determined. The honeycomb-like arrangement formed from separated 1D molecular chains was similar to another system of POM-surfactant hybrid crystals [43].
As shown in Figure 4c, the bent C12N2 cation held three C-C bonds with gauche conformation (C5–C6, C8–C9, and C10–C11), which caused the segregation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic sections in the C12N2-H2W12 crystal to form a honeycomb-like arrangement of 1D H2W12-H2O chains (Figure 4a,b). The hydrophilic heads of C12N2 interacted with the H2W12 anions via N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds [42] (N⋯O distance of 2.79–3.01 Å; mean value: 2.85 Å). Some methylene groups of the C12N2 cation formed C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds [42] (C⋯O distance of 3.37–3.72 Å; mean value: 3.58 Å) with the H2W12 anions.

2.3. Conductive Property of C12N2-H2W12 Hybrid Crystal

The honeycomb-like structure of the C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystal associated anisotropic 1D alignment of the H2W12 anions and C12N2 cations, which may be beneficial to the emergence of conductivity derived from the dissociative protons of C12N2. The conductivity of the C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystal was evaluated by alternating current (AC) impedance spectroscopy under low- and high-humidified conditions. Figure 5a shows that Nyquist spectra under low humidified conditions (30% RH) exhibited high values in the real part of complex impedance. The conductivities were estimated from the interception values in the horizontal axis of extrapolated semicircular Nyquist spectra to be 1.1 × 10−8 S cm−1 at 25 °C and 1.3 × 10−8 S cm−1 at 40 °C. The conductivity values under the high-humidified condition (95% RH) significantly increased to 5.9 × 10−6 S cm−1 at 25 °C and 9.4 × 10−6 S cm−1 at 40 °C (Figure 5b). The conductivity values were not high enough; however, they increased by two orders of magnitude from the low-humidified condition to the high-humidified condition, which implied that the C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystal was a moderate proton conductor.

3. Discussion

As shown in Scheme 1, C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystals were prepared using three different routes, which essentially employed an ion-exchange reaction. The synthesized products of C12N2-H2W12 were the same in their molecular and crystal structures. The C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystals obtained using “Route 1” and “Route 2” were obtained as single phases, whereas the C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 3” was a mixture. This was possibly due to the higher synthetic temperature in “Route 3” (150~200 °C), which caused the emergence of another phase as brown precipitate (Figure S2).
The difference between “Route 1” and “Route 2” was the concentration of the starting H2W12 and C12N2 solutions. In “Route 1”, concentrated solutions (2.0 × 10−2 mol/L for H2W12 and 4.9 × 10−2 mol/L for C12N2) were applied to obtain crystalline precipitate of C12N2-H2W12 at a high yield (~90%). The C12N2-H2W12 precipitate from “Route 1” was highly crystalline, and unit cell parameters (a = 18.459(4), b = 18.459(4), c = 12.696(4) Å, α = 90.000, β = 90.000, γ = 120.000°, and V = 3746.4(16) Å3) were found using the powder XRD pattern (Figure 3a). These values were similar to those revealed by single crystal structure analyses (Table 1), indicating that the C12N2-H2W12 precipitate from “Route 1” and single crystals from “Route 2” (Figure S1) and “Route 3” (Figure 4) had the same crystal structures. Once prepared, the C12N2-H2W12 precipitate could not be recrystallized from water or organic solvents, probably due to low solubility.
On the other hand, “Route 2”, utilizing diluted solutions (5.0 × 10−4 mol/L for H2W12 and 1.5 × 10−3 mol/L for C12N2), yielded a small amount of precipitate just after the H2W12 and C12N2 solutions were combined; this enabled the growth of C12N2-H2W12 crystals from the resulting filtrate. Although the crystals obtained using “Route 2” were not quite suitable for the single crystal X-ray diffraction, the honeycomb-like arrangement of H2W12 was confirmed, as shown in Figure S1.
“Route 3” was carried out under hydrothermal conditions to result in the formation of single crystals of C12N2-H2W12. A synthetic temperature higher (150~200 °C) than “Route 1” and “Route 2” (50 °C) seemed effective for crystal growth of C12N2-H2W12 crystals having relatively low solubility (<~5.0 × 10−4 mol/L). The starting material, Na-EuW10, decomposed under hydrothermal conditions to form single crystals of C12N2-H2W12 and brown precipitate (Figure S2). The presence of Eu3+ was not observed in the crystal structure of C12N2-H2W12, but was observed in the brown precipitate that exhibited emission owing to Eu3+ (Figure S2c). The emission spectrum and emission decay time (2.3 ms) were similar to those of Na-EuW10 [39]. The IR peaks of the brown solid were relatively unclear, but showed some signals observed in Na-EuW10 and C12N2 (Figure S2a). The brown solid did not contain the crystalline C12N2-H2W12 (Figure S2b); therefore, it may have been a hybrid material of the remaining EuW10 anion and C12N2 cation.
The crystal packing of C12N2-H2W12 possessed a striking honeycomb-like structure, which is rare [30,43]; long bolaamphiphiles or single-headed surfactants hybridized with POM anions seem to prefer layer structures [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,34,36,37,38]. It is not clear why the C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystal packed in the honeycomb-like structure; however, the formation of 1D H2W12-H2O chains were crucial [43]. The formation of layer structure in POM–surfactant hybrid crystals requires the formation of two-dimensional (2D) layers consisting of chemical components [28,29,34]. In the C12N2-H2W12 crystal, hydrogen-bonded 1D H2W12-H2O chains formed, and the molecular interaction between these 1D H2W12-H2O chains may not have been anisotropically strong enough to form 2D alignment, which resulted in more isotropic alignment with a honeycomb-like structure.
The C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystal had dissociative C12N2 protons with 1D alignment due to the honeycomb-like structure, which may be promising for the emergence of proton conductivity. The conductivities were 10−8 S cm−1 order under low-humidified conditions and 10−6 S cm−1 order under high-humidified conditions, which were relatively low values. Adding humidity improved the conductivities by two orders of magnitude to ~10−6 S cm−1, suggesting the relevance of water molecules in the conduction mechanism. As mentioned above, the C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystal had water molecules of crystallization forming 1D H2W12-H2O chains. These plausibly rigid 1D H2W12-H2O chains may have decreased the mobility of water molecules in the crystal lattice of C12N2-H2W12, resulting in low conductivities. The C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystals were stable until 250 °C, as shown in TG profile (Figure S3), and its conductivity may have increased under a higher temperature (>100 °C). Although the conductivity of C12N2-W12 was not high, the relevance between the compound structure and proton conductivity could provide helpful suggestions regarding the construction of effective proton conductors.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General Procedures and Instrumental Methods

Chemical reagents purchased from commercial sources (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan, and Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (TCI), Tokyo, Japan) were utilized as received. Solid 1,12-dodecamethylenediammonium chloride ([H3N(CH2)12NH3]Cl2, C12N2-Cl) was prepared by adding equimolar hydrochloric acid to 1,12-dodecanediamine. Sodium decatungstoeuropate (Na9[EuW10O36]·32H2O, Na-EuW10) was prepared according to the literature [39].
Infrared (IR) spectra were measured using a Jasco FT/IR-4200ST spectrometer (KBr pellet method). Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded using a Rigaku MiniFlex300 diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54056 Å) under ambient atmosphere. Unit cell parameters were found using DASH [44]. CHN (carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen) elemental analyses were conducted using a PerkinElmer 2400II elemental analyzer. Thermal gravimetric (TG) analyses were carried out using a Seiko Instruments TG/DTA-6200 at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen atmosphere. Emission spectra were measured at room temperature using a Jasco FP-8300 fluorescence spectrometer. Alternating current (AC) impedance spectra were recorded using an Agilent technologies 4284A or a HIOKI 3532-50 LCR meter (frequency range: 5 to 5.0 × 106 Hz) coupled with an Espec SH-641 bench-top-type temperature and humidity chamber with pelletized samples sandwiched with Pt electrodes.

4.2. Syntheses

4.2.1. Route 1

Sodium metatungstate (Na6[H2W12O40nH2O (Na-H2W12), 0.70 g (0.20 mmol) was dissolved in 10 mL of distilled water, and 1,12-dodecanediamine (0.12 g, 0.59 mmol) was dissolved in 10 mL of distilled water by adding 2 mL of 1 M HCl. These solutions were heated to ca. 50 °C and mixed together at ca. 50 °C. The resulting suspension was maintained at 42 °C for 12 days, and then colorless precipitate was filtered and dried to obtain colorless crystalline precipitate of C12N2-H2W12 (0.61 g, yield 90%). This crystalline precipitate of C12N2-H2W12 could not be recrystallized from water or organic solvent. Analysis: calculated for C36H100N6W12O40: C: 12.26, H: 2.86, and N: 2.38%. Found: C: 12.21, H: 2.84, and N: 2.21%. IR (KBr disk): 3223 (w), 3041 (w), 2924 (m), 2853 (m), 1492 (w), 1469 (w), 932 (m), 882 (s), 777 (s), 595 (w), 435 (w), and 419 (w) cm−1.

4.2.2. Route 2

Na-H2W12 (0.036 g, 0.010 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of distilled water, and 1,12-dodecanediamine (0.0078 g, 0.038 mmol) was dissolved in 25 mL of ethanol. These solutions were heated to ca. 50 °C, mixed together at ca. 50 °C with stirring for 10 min, and then filtered. The resulting colorless clear filtrate was maintained at 42 °C to form colorless plate crystals of C12N2-H2W12. Some crystals were subjected to single crystal X-ray diffraction measurements; IR (KBr disk): 3217 (w), 3063 (w), 2924 (m), 2853 (m), 1491 (w), 1469 (w), 934 (m), 889 (s), 763 (s), 623 (w), 430 (w), and 418 (w) cm−1.

4.2.3. Route 3

Na-EuW10 (0.50 g, 0.16 mmol) and C12N2-Cl (0.280 g, 1.0 mmol) were dissolved in 10 mL of distilled water. A more diluted condition (Na-EuW10: 0.22 g, 0.070 mmol; C12N2-Cl: 0.064 g, 0.24 mmol) was also used. The Na-EuW10 solution was poured into 30 mL Teflon beaker, and then the solution of C12N2-Cl was added. The Teflon beaker was transferred into a stainless container, heated at 150~200 °C for 96 h, and then cooled to room temperature for 48 h. The resulting product, containing colorless plate crystals of C12N2-H2W12 and brown precipitate, was filtered and dried. The crystals were suitable for single crystal X-ray diffraction measurements.

4.3. Crystal Structure Determination

X-ray diffraction data for the C12N2-H2W12 crystals were collected using a Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer with PROCESS-AUTO [45] or an XtaLAB P200 diffractometer with CrysAlisPro [46]. Both instruments used graphite monochromated Mo Kα radiation. Crystal structures were solved using SHELXS (Version 2013/1) [47] or SHELXT (Version 2018/2) [48], and refined using the full-matrix least-squares using SHELXL (Version 2018/3) [47].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24032824/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.I.; methodology, H.I. (Haruka Ikuma), S.A., and K.K.; formal analysis, T.I., J.K., Y.K., S.O., H.I. (Hironori Iwamatsu), and Y.O.; investigation, H.I. (Haruka Ikuma), S.A., K.K., and S.O.; resources, Y.O. and M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, T.I.; writing—review and editing, T.I.; visualization, T.I., H.I. (Haruka Ikuma), S.A., and K.K.; funding acquisition, T.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI (grant numbers JP26410245 and JP21K05232) and the JSPS Core-to-Core Program (grant number A31-4).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Further details of the crystal structure investigation (CCDC 2232675) can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (accessed on 24 December 2022), or by emailing [email protected], or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; Fax: +44-1223-336033.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Evans, D.F.; Wennerström, H. The Colloidal Domain, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rosen, M.J.; Kunjappu, J.T. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena, 4th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kronberg, B.; Holmberg, K.; Lindman, B. Surface Chemistry of Surfactants and Polymers, 1st ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2014; pp. 1–47. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradshaw, D.; El-Hankari, S.; Lupica-Spagnolo, L. Supramolecular templating of hierarchically porous metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5431–5443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fuhrhop, J.-H.; Wang, T. Bolaamphiphiles. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 2901–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shimizu, T.; Masuda, M.; Minamikawa, H. Supramolecular nanotube architectures based on amphiphilic molecules. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1401–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vargas, B.; Rodríguez-López, G.; Solis-Ibarra, D. The emergence of halide layered double perovskites. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 3591–3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Coronado, E.; Gómez-García, C.J. Polyoxometalate-based molecular materials. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 273–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Proust, A.; Matt, B.; Villanneau, R.; Guillemot, G.; Gouzerh, P.; Izzet, G. Functionalization and post-functionalization: A step towards polyoxometalate-based materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7605–7622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Misra, A.; Kozma, K.; Streb, C.; Nyman, M. Beyond charge balance: Counter-cations in polyoxometalate chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 596–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sadakane, M.; Steckhan, E. Electrochemical properties of polyoxometalates as electrocatalysts. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 219–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Song, Y.-F.; Long, D.-L.; Ritchie, C.; Cronin, L. Nanoscale Polyoxometalate-Based Inorganic/Organic Hybrids. Chem. Rec. 2011, 11, 158–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yin, P.; Li, D.; Liu, T. Solution behaviors and self-assembly of polyoxometalates as models of macroions and amphiphilic polyoxometalate-organic hybrids as novel surfactants. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7368–7383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, H.; Yang, H.-K.; Wang, W. Covalently-linked polyoxometalate–polymer hybrids: Optimizing synthesis, appealing structures and prospective applications. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 886–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, B.; Li, W.; Li, H.; Wu, L. Ionic complexes of metal oxide clusters for versatile self-assemblies. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 1391–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nisar, A.; Wang, X. Surfactant-encapsulated polyoxometalate building blocks: Controlled assembly and their catalytic properties. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 9832–9845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Clemente-León, M.; Coronado, E.; Soriano-Portillo, A.; Mingotaud, C.; Dominguez-Vera, J.M. Langmuir–Blodgett films based on inorganic molecular complexes with magnetic or optical properties. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 116, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, G.; Ke, H.; He, T.; Xiao, D.; Chen, Z.; Yang, W.; Yao, J. Synthesis and characterization of new layered polyoxometallates-1,10-decanediamine intercalative nanocomposites. J. Mater. Res. 2004, 19, 496–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Janauer, G.G.; Dobley, A.D.; Zavalij, P.Y.; Whittingham, M.S. Evidence for decavanadate clusters in the lamellar surfactant ion phase. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 647–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Spahr, M.E.; Nesper, R. Anhydrous octamolybdate with trimethyl hexadecyl ammonium cations. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2001, 627, 2133–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ito, T.; Sawada, K.; Yamase, T. Crystal structure of bis(dimethyldioctadecylammonium) hexamolybdate: A molecular model of Langmuir-Blodgett films. Chem. Lett. 2003, 32, 938–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ito, T. Inorganic–organic hybrid surfactant crystals: Structural aspects and functions. Crystals 2016, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nyman, M.; Ingersoll, D.; Singh, S.; Bonhomme, F.; Alam, T.M.; Brinker, C.J.; Rodriguez, M.A. Comparative study of inorganic cluster-surfactant arrays. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 2885–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nyman, M.; Rodriguez, M.A.; Anderson, T.M.; Ingersoll, D. Two structures toward understanding evolution from surfactant-polyoxometalate lamellae to surfactant-encapsulated polyoxometalates. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 3590–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yin, P.; Wu, P.; Xiao, Z.; Li, D.; Bitterlich, E.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, P.; Vezenov, D.V.; Liu, T.; Wei, Y. A Double-tailed fluorescent surfactant with a hexavanadate cluster as the head group. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2521–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rosnes, M.H.; Musumeci, C.; Yvon, C.; Macdonell, A.; Pradeep, C.P.; Sartorio, C.; Long, D.-L.; Pignataro, B.; Cronin, L. Exploring the interplay between ligand derivatisation and cation type in the assembly of hybrid polyoxometalate Mn-Andersons. Small 2013, 9, 2316–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, Y.; Lin, X.; Huang, B.; Chen, W.; Xiao, Z.; Wu, P. The crystal packing, morphology and hydrophobicity of polyoxometalate-based amphiphilic materials. CrystEngComm 2020, 22, 2434–2438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rakovský, E.; Zúrková, L.; Marek, J. 1,6-Hexanediammonium dihydrogendecavanadate dihydrate, (H3N-(CH2)6-NH3)2H2V10O28·2H2O. Cryst. Res. Technol. 2001, 36, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rakovský, E.; Žúrková, L.; Marek, J. Synthesis, Crystal structure, and IR spectroscopic characterization of 1,6-hexanediammnoium dihydrogendecavanadate. Monatsh. Chem. 2002, 133, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hölscher, M.; Englert, U.; Zibrowius, B.; Hölderich, W.F. (H3N(CH2)6NH3)4[W18P2O62]·3H2O, a microporous solid from dawson anions and 1,6-diaminohexane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2491–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gabriel, J.-C.P.; Nagarajan, R.; Natarajan, S.; Cheetham, A.K.; Rao, C.N.R. Hydrothermal synthesis and structure of a mixed valent heteropoly-oxometallate Keggin salt: [PMo4.27W7.73O406−][H3N(CH2)6NH32+]3. J. Solid State Chem. 1997, 129, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, E.; Qin, C.; Li, Y.; Qi, Y.; Wang, X. Two extended structures constructed from sandwich-type polyoxometalates functionalized by organic amines. Dalton Trans. 2008, 8, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pan, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Liu, G.; Lin, H.; Li, Y. Four Octamolybdate-based complexes based on flexible bis-imidazole-bis-amide ligands with different lengths: Structure, electrochemical and photocatalytic properties. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2019, 495, 118998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kiyota, Y.; Kojima, T.; Kawahara, R.; Taira, M.; Naruke, H.; Kawano, M.; Uchida, S.; Ito, T. Porous layered inorganic−organic hybrid frameworks constructed from polyoxovanadate and bolaamphiphiles. Cryst. Growth Des. 2021, 21, 7230–7239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Eda, K.; Iriki, Y. Crystal Engineering with [Mo36O112(H2O)16]8− anion as nanosized building block. Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 612–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nelson, J.H.; Johnston, A.R.; Narducci Sarjeant, A.; Norquist, A.J. Composition space analysis of templated molybdates. Solid State Sci. 2007, 9, 472–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Niu, Y.-Y.; Wang, L.-F.; Lv, X.R.; Du, H.-J.; Qiao, Y.-Z.; Wang, H.-M.; Song, L.-S.; Wu, B.-L.; Hou, H.-W.; Ng, S.W. Construction and isomeric transformation of polyoxometalates directed by 1,ω-bis(pyridinium)alkane templates. CrystEngComm 2011, 13, 5071–5081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Du, H.-J.; Mi, L.-W.; Yue, Z.-C.; Niu, Y.-Y.; Hou, H.-W. Templated fabrication, isomer recognition of series of 1,10-(alkane-1,ω-diyl)-bis(3-methylimidazolium)-induced polyoxometalates (ω= 1–11). Inorg. Chim. Acta 2014, 409, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sugeta, M.; Yamase, T. Crystal structure and luminescence site of Na9[EuW10O36]·32H2O. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1993, 66, 444–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff, C.; Fournier, M.; Franck, R.; Thouvenot, R. Vibrational investigations of polyoxometalates. 2. Evidence for anion-anion interactions in molybdenum(VI) and tungsten(VI) compounds related to the Keggin structure. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Silverstein, R.M.; Webster, F.X.; Kiemle, D.J. Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds, 7th ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2005; Chapter 2. [Google Scholar]
  42. Desiraju, G.R.; Steiner, T. The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  43. Misawa, T.; Kobayashi, J.; Kiyota, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Ono, S.; Okamura, Y.; Koguchi, S.; Higuchi, M.; Nagase, Y.; Ito, T. Dimensional control in polyoxometalate crystals hybridized with amphiphilic polymerizable ionic liquids. Materials 2019, 12, 2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. David, W.I.F.; Shankland, K.; van de Streek, J.; Pidcock, E.; Motherwell, W.D.S.; Cole, J.C. DASH: A program for crystal structure determination from powder diffraction data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2006, 39, 910–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. PROCESS-AUTO; Rigaku Corporation: Tokyo, Japan, 2002.
  46. CrysAlisPro; Rigaku Oxford Diffraction: Tokyo, Japan, 2015.
  47. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Molecular structure of utilized components: (a) Keggin-type metatungstate anion, [H2W12O40]6− (H2W12); and (b) Dodecamethylenediammonium, [H3N(CH2)12NH3]2+ (C12N2).
Figure 1. Molecular structure of utilized components: (a) Keggin-type metatungstate anion, [H2W12O40]6− (H2W12); and (b) Dodecamethylenediammonium, [H3N(CH2)12NH3]2+ (C12N2).
Ijms 24 02824 g001
Scheme 1. Schematic representations of synthetic procedures for C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystals: (a) “Route 1”, an ion-exchange reaction using concentrated solutions; (b) “Route 2”, an ion-exchange reaction using diluted solutions; and (c) “Route 3”, a hydrothermal reaction using decatungstoeuropate anion as a starting material.
Scheme 1. Schematic representations of synthetic procedures for C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystals: (a) “Route 1”, an ion-exchange reaction using concentrated solutions; (b) “Route 2”, an ion-exchange reaction using diluted solutions; and (c) “Route 3”, a hydrothermal reaction using decatungstoeuropate anion as a starting material.
Ijms 24 02824 sch001
Figure 2. IR spectra of C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystals: (a) starting sodium salt of H2W12 (Na-H2W12); (b) colorless precipitate of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 1”; (c) colorless crystals of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 2”; and (d) colorless crystals of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 3”.
Figure 2. IR spectra of C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystals: (a) starting sodium salt of H2W12 (Na-H2W12); (b) colorless precipitate of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 1”; (c) colorless crystals of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 2”; and (d) colorless crystals of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 3”.
Ijms 24 02824 g002
Figure 3. Powder XRD patterns of C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystals: (a) colorless precipitate of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 1”; (b) colorless crystals of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 2”; and (c) calculated pattern from the crystal structure of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 3”.
Figure 3. Powder XRD patterns of C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystals: (a) colorless precipitate of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 1”; (b) colorless crystals of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 2”; and (c) calculated pattern from the crystal structure of C12N2-H2W12 obtained using “Route 3”.
Ijms 24 02824 g003
Figure 4. Crystal structure of C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystal obtained using “Route 3” (C: gray, N: blue, O: red; and H2W12 anions depicted by polyhedral representation). H atoms were omitted for clarity. (a) Packing diagram projected along the c-axis. A honeycomb-like arrangement of H2W12 anions is highlighted by a red broken hexagon; (b) molecular arrangement of H2W12 anions and water molecules of crystallization (1D H2W12-H2O chain) viewed along the b-axis, with O⋯O short contacts represented by black broken lines; and (c) molecular conformation of C12N2 cation. C atoms relevant to gauche conformation are numbered.
Figure 4. Crystal structure of C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystal obtained using “Route 3” (C: gray, N: blue, O: red; and H2W12 anions depicted by polyhedral representation). H atoms were omitted for clarity. (a) Packing diagram projected along the c-axis. A honeycomb-like arrangement of H2W12 anions is highlighted by a red broken hexagon; (b) molecular arrangement of H2W12 anions and water molecules of crystallization (1D H2W12-H2O chain) viewed along the b-axis, with O⋯O short contacts represented by black broken lines; and (c) molecular conformation of C12N2 cation. C atoms relevant to gauche conformation are numbered.
Ijms 24 02824 g004
Figure 5. Nyquist spectra of C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystals: (a) measured under a low-humidified condition (30% RH) and (b) measured under a high-humidified condition (95% RH).
Figure 5. Nyquist spectra of C12N2-H2W12 hybrid crystals: (a) measured under a low-humidified condition (30% RH) and (b) measured under a high-humidified condition (95% RH).
Ijms 24 02824 g005
Table 1. Crystallographic data.
Table 1. Crystallographic data.
CompoundC12N2-H2W12
Chemical formulaC36H92N6W12O44
Formula weight3519.35
Crystal systemtrigonal
Space groupP3 (No. 147)
a (Å)18.3644 (4)
b (Å)18.3644 (4)
c (Å)12.7069 (3)
α (°)90.000
β (°)90.000
γ (°)120.000
V3)3711.28 (17)
Z2
ρcalcd (g cm−3)3.149
T (K)296 (2)
Wavelength (Å)0.71075
μ (mm−1)18.604
No. of reflections measured60,648
No. of independent reflections5667
Rint0.0619
No. of parameters301
R1 (I > 2σ(I))0.0227
wR2 (all data)0.0501
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ikuma, H.; Aoki, S.; Kawahara, K.; Ono, S.; Iwamatsu, H.; Kobayashi, J.; Kiyota, Y.; Okamura, Y.; Higuchi, M.; Ito, T. An Inorganic–Organic Hybrid Framework Composed of Polyoxotungstate and Long-Chained Bolaamphiphile. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032824

AMA Style

Ikuma H, Aoki S, Kawahara K, Ono S, Iwamatsu H, Kobayashi J, Kiyota Y, Okamura Y, Higuchi M, Ito T. An Inorganic–Organic Hybrid Framework Composed of Polyoxotungstate and Long-Chained Bolaamphiphile. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(3):2824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032824

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ikuma, Haruka, Shunsuke Aoki, Kai Kawahara, Seiji Ono, Hironori Iwamatsu, Jun Kobayashi, Yoshiki Kiyota, Yosuke Okamura, Masashi Higuchi, and Takeru Ito. 2023. "An Inorganic–Organic Hybrid Framework Composed of Polyoxotungstate and Long-Chained Bolaamphiphile" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 3: 2824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032824

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop