Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of the Cytochrome P450 Monooxygenase Family in 19 Aphid Species and Their Expression Analysis in 4 Cereal Crop Aphids
Previous Article in Journal
Connection Failure: Differences in White Matter Microstructure Are Associated with 5-HTTLPR but Not with Risk Seeking for Losses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Roles of the Arabidopsis KEULE Gene in Postembryonic Development

by
Alejandro Ruiz-Bayón
,
Carolina Cara-Rodríguez
,
Raquel Sarmiento-Mañús
,
Rafael Muñoz-Viana
,
Francisca M. Lozano
,
María Rosa Ponce
and
José Luis Micol
*
Instituto de Bioingeniería, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Campus de Elche, 03202 Elche, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, 28222 Majadahonda, Spain.
Current address: Instituto Bernabeu, 03016 Alicante, Spain.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(12), 6667; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126667
Submission received: 19 May 2024 / Revised: 14 June 2024 / Accepted: 16 June 2024 / Published: 18 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Cytokinesis in plant cells begins with the fusion of vesicles that transport cell wall materials to the center of the cell division plane, where the cell plate forms and expands radially until it fuses with the parental cell wall. Vesicle fusion is facilitated by trans-SNARE complexes, with assistance from Sec1/Munc18 (SM) proteins. The SNARE protein KNOLLE and the SM protein KEULE are required for membrane fusion at the cell plate. Due to the crucial function of KEULE, all Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) keule mutants identified to date are seedling lethal. Here, we identified the Arabidopsis serrata4-1 (sea4-1) and sea4-2 mutants, which carry recessive, hypomorphic alleles of KEULE. Homozygous sea4-1 and sea4-2 plants are viable and fertile but have smaller rosettes and fewer leaves at bolting than the wild type. Their leaves are serrated, small, and wavy, with a complex venation pattern. The mutant leaves also develop necrotic patches and undergo premature senescence. RNA-seq revealed transcriptome changes likely leading to reduced cell wall integrity and an increase in the unfolded protein response. These findings shed light on the roles of KEULE in postembryonic development, particularly in the patterning of rosette leaves and leaf margins.

1. Introduction

During cytokinesis, the cytoplasm of a cell is divided, forming two daughter cells. In plant cells, the phragmoplast, a dynamic matrix of antiparallel microtubules, transports vesicles containing cell wall materials from the trans-Golgi network to the center of the cell division plane. These vesicles accumulate in the cell division plane and fuse together, forming the cell plate, which expands radially toward the plasma membrane of the parental cell. Fusion between the cell plate and plasma membrane occurs at the cortical division site where the preprophase band, a densely packed matrix of actin filaments and antiparallel microtubules, was formed. Finally, callose and cellulose synthases modify the newly formed cell wall, increasing its rigidity and physically separating the daughter cells [1].
Proteins involved in cytokinesis in Arabidopsis thaliana (hereafter Arabidopsis) are classified into three categories: proteins responsible for the proper orientation of the division plane, proteins directly involved in executing cytokinesis, and proteins involved in cell wall biosynthesis [2]. The first category includes proteins such as TONNEAU1 (TON1) and TON2 [3], TON1-RECRUITING MOTIF1 (TRM1; [4]), and TANGLED1 (TAN1; [5]). The second category comprises proteins that organize antiparallel microtubules, such as the kinesin RADIALLY SWOLLEN7 (RSW7; [6]) and the tubulin folding cofactors PILZ [7]; proteins involved in phragmoplast reorganization, such as the microtubule-associated kinase RUNKEL (RUK; [8]), the kinesin HINKEL (HIK; [9]) and the microtubule-associated protein PLEIADE (PLE; [10]); and proteins that participate in vesicle fusion at the cell plate, such as the subunits of the Transport Protein Particle II complex (TRAPPII), the tethering factor CLUB [11], the syntaxin KNOLLE (KN; [12]), and the Sec1/Munc18 (SM) protein KEULE (KEU; [13]). The third category includes callose synthases such as MASSUE (MAS; [2]) and CALLOSE SYNTHASE1 (CALS1; [14]), cellulose synthases such as PROSCUTE1 (PRC1; [15]) and RADIALLY SWOLLEN1 (RSW1; [16]), the GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase CYTOKINESIS DEFECTIVE1 (CYT1; [17]), and the endo-1,4-beta-D-glucanase KORRIGAN (KOR; [18]).
The formation of the cell plate during cytokinesis occurs through the fusion of vesicles from the trans-Golgi network. Trafficking of these vesicles begins during anaphase, when the phragmoplast transports the vesicles to the cell division plane along with other membrane and cell wall components. In Arabidopsis, the Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-Sensitive Factor (NSF) Attachment Protein Receptor complexes (SNARE) play a central role in vesicle fusion [19]. These complexes, along with other components of the vesicle fusion machinery, are highly conserved in eukaryotic cells and have been studied in many species [20].
Vesicle fusion requires proper tethering and docking [21]. During tethering, specific proteins on a vesicle surface capture other vesicles, keeping them close to facilitate their fusion [22]. These tethering proteins have supercoiled helical structures or are part of protein complexes such as TRAPP or the exocyst [21]. During docking, SNARE complexes form between a vesicle and a cell membrane (heterotypic fusion) or between biochemically identical membranes (homotypic fusion), which brings the merging membranes closer to each other [23]. SNARE complexes consist of four SNARE domains, each containing an alpha-helix anchored to a membrane via its C-terminus. SNARE components anchored to a vesicle are referred to as v-SNARE or R-SNARE, as they possess an arginine (R) residue at the center of the SNARE domain. SNARE components anchored to a target membrane are known as t-SNARE or Q-SNARE, as they contain a glutamic acid (Q) residue at the same position. The SNARE complex consists of four components: a SNARE domain from an R-SNARE, another from a syntaxin (Qa-SNARE domain), and two domains from Synaptosomal-Associated Protein 25 (SNAP25; Qbc-SNARE domain) or from two independent proteins (Qb-SNARE and Qc-SNARE domains) [24].
Syntaxins can adopt closed or open conformations. In the closed conformation, the Habc N-terminal domain, consisting of three alpha-helices, folds over its SNARE domain. In the open conformation, the Habc and SNARE domains remain separate [25]. The syntaxin KNOLLE plays a central role in cytokinesis. In Arabidopsis, KNOLLE is transported by trans-Golgi vesicles in cis-SNARE complexes with the Qbc-SNARE SOLUBLE N-ETHYLMALEIMIDE-SENSITIVE FACTOR ADAPTOR PROTEIN33 (AtSNAP33), which is the Arabidopsis homolog of human SNAP25 [26], and the R-SNARE VESICLE-ASSOCIATED MEMBRANE PROTEIN721 (VAMP721). At the division plane, the ATPase NSF separates the components of the cis-SNARE complexes, and KNOLLE adopts a closed conformation, preventing its interaction with other SNARE components. During cytokinesis, the presence of KEULE stabilizes the open conformation of KNOLLE by interacting with the linker region between its domains [23]. This stabilization promotes the formation of trans-SNARE complexes with the SNARE components of adjacent vesicles [23]. KEULE also interacts with other syntaxins in heterotypic fusions, such as the closed conformation of SYNTAXIN-RELATED PROTEIN1 (SYP121), which participates in vesicle trafficking of the cell membrane during drought stress and pathogen defense [27].
All Arabidopsis keule (keu) mutants studied to date are seedling lethal and have large multi-nucleated cells with incomplete cell walls in dividing embryonic cell populations [28]. Seedlings with the same keu genotype can exhibit various morphologies, ranging from balls of undifferentiated cells to seedlings with well-defined organs, although most are rod-shaped [28]. Seedlings with the most severe mutant phenotype exhibit a swollen epidermis, with poorly defined cellular layers containing undifferentiated cells in both the epidermis and inner tissues. This is not observed in seedlings with milder morphologies. The division planes in the keu mutants are improperly oriented, and cytokinesis occurs at a slower pace [28]. During embryogenesis, the division of the smallest daughter cell of the zygote occurs perpendicular instead of parallel to the apical–basal axis. Additionally, the asynchronous tangential divisions of the zygote often lead to the partial or total loss of the protoderm. However, these embryos usually recover this aspect of the wild-type phenotype during development [28].
Here, we describe two new hypomorphic alleles of the Arabidopsis KEU gene, serrata4-1 (sea4-1) and sea4-2, which are viable and fertile. The sea4-1 mutation causes retention of the ninth intron of KEU and the sea4-2 mutation is predicted to induce an amino acid substitution in the SNARE interaction domain of KEU. Both mutants display reduced rosette size and plant height, abnormal leaf venation patterns, variable cell sizes within the epidermis and palisade mesophyll, and apparently undifferentiated cells throughout these layers, as well as premature leaf senescence. Our findings shed light on the functions of KEULE in adult plants, paving the way for future investigation of the postembryonic roles of this essential gene.

2. Results

2.1. The sea4 Mutants Carry Novel Hypomorphic Viable Alleles of KEU

In a large-scale screening for Arabidopsis leaf mutants conducted after ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis of Landsberg erecta (Ler) seeds [29], we isolated two mutants displaying serrated and wavy rosette leaves with necrotic patches. These mutants were found to be allelic and were named serrata4-1 (sea4-1) and sea4-2. Initially, the sea4-1 and sea4-2 mutations were mapped at low resolution to a 660 kb candidate region of chromosome 1 containing approximately 250 genes (Figure 1A) using iterative linkage analysis to molecular markers (Table S1; [30]). We generated backcross mapping populations by selecting F2 plants exhibiting the mutant phenotype and subjected their pooled genomic DNA to next-generation sequencing. We analyzed the resulting paired-end reads using Easymap v.2, which also pointed to the same region of chromosome 1 (Figure 1B). By comparing the lists of candidate mutations identified in sea4-1 (Table S2) and sea4-2 (Table S3), we identified At1g12360 as the most likely candidate gene, which encodes the Sec1/Munc18 protein KEULE (KEU), as both mutants carried a mutation in this gene.
We obtained three lines from the SALK collection that were annotated to carry T-DNA insertions within the At1g12360 transcription unit: SALK_101874C, SALKseq_085463, and SALKseq_089213. We renamed the mutations in these lines keu-21, keu-22, and keu-23, respectively (Figure 1C). Additionally, Prof. Gerd Jürgens provided us with the line keuMM125 [31], which carries a 100 bp deletion in the 16th exon of KEU (Figure 1C). As expected, plants homozygous for these putatively null keu alleles were embryonic lethal, and the rosettes of the KEU/keu-21, KEU/keu-22, KEU/keu-23, and KEU/keuMM125 heterozygotes were phenotypically wild type. Crosses of KEU/keu-21, KEU/keu-22, and KEU/keu-23 heterozygotes to homozygous sea4/sea4 plants produced viable heterozygous sea4/keu plants, exhibiting a mutant phenotype more severe than that of sea4-1/sea4-1 or sea4-2/sea4-2 homozygotes (Figure 2). Crosses of KEU/keuMM125 heterozygotes to homozygous sea4/sea4 plants produced heterozygous sea4/keuMM125 plants displaying a similar phenotype (Figure 2), but they died at the end of the vegetative phase without bolting or producing inflorescences. These results confirm the notion that sea4-1 and sea4-2 are hypomorphic alleles of KEU.

2.2. The sea4-1 Mutation Causes Mis-Splicing of the KEU Pre-mRNA, and sea4-2 Appears to Perturb the Secondary Structure of the KEU Protein

The Arabidopsis KEU gene is expressed throughout the plant, especially in tissues undergoing division. KEU exists in soluble form in the cytoplasm or associates with membranes during cytokinesis. KEU is involved in cytokinesis, but not in cellular elongation. KEU shares 28−30% identity with its Sec1 orthologs in mammals, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Drosophila melanogaster, and 61% and 65% identity with its Arabidopsis homologs SEC1A and SEC1B, respectively [13].
In sea4-1, a G→A transition at the 3′ end of the ninth exon of KEU damages the splice donor site. In sea4-2, a C→T transition in the third exon is predicted to result in an S57L substitution (Figure 1C). Since sea4-1 is likely to undergo mis-splicing and produce abnormal mRNA and protein products, we conducted RNA-seq analysis of this line, finding that 99.17% of its mature mRNAs retained the ninth intron (Table S4), leading to a premature stop codon. The mutant SEA4-1 protein consists of 302 amino acids, 38 of which are absent from wild-type KEU (Figure S1). The expression level of KEU was five times higher in the sea4-1 mutant than in Ler, as indicated by the number of RNA-seq reads aligned to KEU, likely to compensate for the near absence of wild-type mRNAs (Table S5).
Alignment of the KEU sequence with its rat STXBP1 ortholog revealed that the sea4-2 mutation alters one of the amino acids that physically interact with syntaxins (Figure S2; [32]). To assess the impact of this mutation on the structural stability and dynamics of KEU, we used Dynamut and DynaMut2 to predict differences in the unfolding Gibbs free energy (ΔΔG) and vibrational entropy energy (ΔΔSVib) between the wild-type and mutant proteins. We obtained the structure of the full-length KEU protein from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database. However, these two predictors provided conflicting ΔΔG values, suggesting that the S57L substitution does not affect protein stability (Table S6). ENCoM calculated a decrease in flexibility of KEU due to this mutation based on the ΔΔSVib value (Table S6 and Figure S3). To predict the effects of the S57L substitution on KEU protein structure, we used Missense 3D. This software did not predict any structural damage to KEU, since both residues were exposed to the solvent in a similar manner. However, two hydrogen bonds between S57 and its neighboring residues V53 and K54 were lost (Figure S4), and the cavity volume increased by 24.408 Å3.

2.3. Morphological and Histological Characterization of the sea4 Mutants

2.3.1. The sea4 Mutants Exhibit a Pleiotropic Morphological Phenotype

Both sea4 mutants exhibited wavy leaves with serrated margins and senescent patches (Figure 2). Both sea4-1 and sea4-2 displayed phenotypic variability, including varying rates of cotyledon and leaf expansion and variations in the extent of senescent patches (Table S7). A similar phenotypic variability was observed in lethal seedlings carrying other keu mutant alleles [28] and reappeared in the progeny of selfed sea4 plants, regardless of the parental phenotype (Figure S5). Inflorescences of sea4 plants contained fertile flowers that opened prematurely before complete maturation (Figure S6E,G). Inflorescences of KEU/keu-21, KEU/keu-22, and KEU/keu-23 plants were indistinguishable from those of Col-0 (Figure S6I,K,M). However, in inflorescences of heterozygotes of sea4-1 or sea4-2 with keu21, keu22, or keu23, only a few flowers opened prematurely. These flowers exhibited short sepals that were separated from each other and had protuberances on their margins, but they remained fertile (Figure S6Q,S,U,W,Y,AA). Inflorescences of KEU/keuMM125 plants produced a few fertile flowers that began to open slightly before reaching complete maturation (Figure S6O), while heterozygous sea4/keuMM125 plants did not produce inflorescences, as already mentioned. Taken together, the latter two observations suggest that keuMM125 is not null; rather, it is an antimorphic allele. Inflorescences of sea4-1/sea4-2 plants contained fewer flowers than those of homozygous sea4 mutants, but they exhibited the same phenotypes (Figure S6AC). The height of sea4-1, sea4-2, and KEU/keuMM125 plants was reduced compared to Ler, whereas KEU/keu-21, KEU/keu-22, and KEU/keu-23 plants did not exhibit a significant difference from the wild type. sea4-1/sea4-2 plants displayed an intermediate height between that of sea4-1 and sea4-2 homozygous plants. Heterozygous sea4/keu plants were even smaller, and individuals carrying a sea4-1 allele were smaller than those carrying a sea4-2 allele, which is consistent with the smaller height observed in sea4-1 vs. sea4-2 plants (Figure S7). The primary root length was also reduced in the sea4 mutants compared to the wild type (Figure S8).

2.3.2. The sea4 Leaves Have a Dense and Complex Venation Pattern

The presence of serrations in sea4 leaves pointed to the existence of other alterations in the internal structures of these leaves. To observe possible alterations in the venation pattern, we decolorized cotyledons, first-node leaves, and third-node leaves of sea4-1 (n = 12) and sea4-2 (n = 13–15) plants and compared their venation patterns to Ler (n = 12–15) (Figure 3). The sea4-1 cotyledons showed an increased number of terminal veins per unit area compared to Ler, whereas sea4-2 cotyledons were smaller and exhibited increased vein length and bifurcation number per unit area. The first-node leaves of sea4-1 and sea4-2 were elongated, smaller, and contained more terminal veins per unit area than Ler. Additionally, sea4-1 first-node leaves displayed increased vein length and bifurcations per unit area compared to Ler. The third-node leaves of sea4-1 and sea4-2 were smaller, with an increase in terminal veins per unit area compared to Ler. In sea4-2, the leaves were also elongated and exhibited increased vein length and bifurcations per unit area compared to Ler (Table S8). Overall, the cotyledons and leaves of the sea4 mutants were smaller and elongated compared to the wild type. They showed a higher vein density, and their venation patterns were more complex than wild type, with a greater number of bifurcations and terminal veins per unit area.

2.3.3. sea4 Leaves Show Aberrant Epidermal and Mesophyll Structure

We obtained transverse sections of third-node leaves from sea4-1, sea4-2, and Ler plants (Figure 4). In the palisade mesophyll of the sea4 mutants, the cells were generally well organized but were more variable in size compared to Ler. Some large cells were interspersed among small cells within the palisade mesophyll. The spongy mesophyll in the sea4 mutants was disorganized, with very large cells surrounded by small cells arranged in multiple layers. The epidermal cells appeared mostly normal, although protuberances were observed on the surfaces of mutant leaves. These protuberances appeared to result from increased local proliferation or growth of mesophyll cells.
We quantified the variation in palisade mesophyll, adaxial epidermis, and abaxial epidermis cells in transverse sections of third- and first-node leaves (Figure 5 and Figure S9). In the palisade mesophyll of the two leaves analyzed, most sea4 cells were smaller than Ler cells, but a small fraction of sea4 cells were larger. In the epidermis, cells tended to have a similar size, although sea4 cells had a simpler shape compared to Ler cells, with fewer protuberances observed in both first- and third-node leaves.

2.3.4. The sea4 Mutants Show Early Leaf Senescence and Bolting

A characteristic trait of the sea4 mutant leaves is the early appearance of senescent patches, which gradually expand until the leaves are completely senescent. To quantify the degree of senescence, we grouped all leaves from sea4-1 (n = 38), sea4-2 (n = 45), and Ler (n = 44) plants into five phenotypic classes based on their degree of senescence at 25 days after stratification (das; Figure S10). Ler plants displayed some senescence in their first four leaves, particularly in the first and second nodes (Figure S10F). sea4-1 leaves exhibited senescence from the first to eighth nodes (Figure S10G), with all leaves showing more severe senescence compared to Ler. Similarly, sea4-2 plants displayed senescence in their first seven leaves (Figure S10H), with leaves in the first and second nodes exhibiting more severe senescence than Ler. In conclusion, sea4 plants demonstrated a more pronounced state of senescence in their initial leaves compared to the wild type and exhibited senescence starting from the fifth-node leaves onwards, which was not observed in Ler.
Senescence appeared earlier in sea4 than in the wild type. The first signs of senescence appeared ~14 das in sea4-1 (n = 95) and sea4-2 (n = 96) plants and ~21 das in Ler (n = 79; Figure S11A). The early onset of senescence was consistent across different phenotypic classes in the sea4 mutants (Figure S11A) and occurred at the same time in both sea4-1 and sea4-2 (Figure S11C). Only sea4-2 exhibited a significant reduction in bolting time compared to Ler (Figure S11B). When considering the phenotypic classes of the sea4 mutants, there was a positive correlation between leaf mutant phenotype severity and an increase in bolting time (Figure S11B).

2.4. Double Mutant Combinations of sea4 Alleles and Alleles of Genes Encoding Proteins Required for Membrane Fusion Show Defects in Leaf Development

As the sea4 mutants carry the first known viable alleles of KEU, we combined them with alleles of other genes involved in membrane fusion to characterize their genetic interactions in adult plants. SEC1B is a KEU homolog in Arabidopsis that is expressed at very low levels, but its overexpression rescued the phenotype of keu mutants [31]. We obtained two lines, sec1b-1 and sec1b-2, carrying T-DNA insertions interrupting SEC1B in the twelfth intron and first exon, respectively (Figure S12A), and showing a wild-type phenotype as homozygotes (Figure 6E,F). The sea4 sec1b-1 double mutants displayed small rosettes with small, highly serrated leaves. The sea4 sec1b-2 double mutants were very small, exhibited fully expanded cotyledons, and lacked true leaves, instead showing small protuberances emerging from the shoot apical meristem (Figure 6L–O).
SEC6 encodes a protein that is part of the exocyst complex, which colocalizes with KEU in the cellular plate [33]. We also obtained the lines sec6-2 and sec6-3, carrying T-DNA insertions in the 23rd and 26th exons of SEC6, respectively (Figure S12B), which presented a wild-type phenotype as homozygotes (Figure 6G,H). The sea4-1 sec6-2 and sea4-1 sec6-3 double mutants displayed a reduced size with small, wavy, heavily serrated leaves, and sea4-2 sec6-2 and sea4-2 sec6-3 exhibited a small size, with their leaves showing minimal or no development (Figure 6P–S).
We also crossed the sea4 mutants with lines carrying mutations in genes encoding syntaxins: SYP21, SYP132, and KNOLLE. SYP21 encodes a syntaxin localized to the vacuole and multivesicular bodies that physically interacts with KEU [23]. The syp21 line carries a T-DNA insertion in the fourth exon of SYP21 (Figure S12C); homozygous plants were phenotypically wild type (Figure 6I). The sea4 syp21 double mutants displayed small rosettes with small, highly serrated leaves (Figure 6T–U). SYP132 encodes a syntaxin that physically interacts with KEU during cytokinesis and with SEC1B in the general secretory pathway [31]. The syp132T line carries a T-DNA insertion in the 5′ UTR of SYP132 (Figure S12D); homozygous plants displayed a wild-type phenotype (Figure 6J). The sea4-1 syp132T double mutants exhibited reduced rosette size, with small, serrated leaves. The sea4-2 syp132T double mutants showed poorly developed leaves and protuberances emerging from the apical shoot meristem (Figure 6V,W). KNOLLE encodes a syntaxin that plays a crucial role in cytokinesis, physically interacting with KEU at the cell plate [13,23,31]; this protein accumulated in previously studied keu mutants [34]. The knX37−2 mutation is a 1 kb deletion that partially removes the KN gene (Figure S12E). Homozygous plants for this deletion were lethal, and heterozygous individuals exhibited small rosettes comprising fully expanded cotyledons and very small epinastic leaves that sometimes showed undulations (Figure 6K). The sea4/sea4;KN/knX37−2 sesquimutants exhibited a phenotype similar to that of the KN/knX37−2 heterozygotes, but their leaves were better developed, larger, and displayed undulations and serrations (Figure 6X,Y).

2.5. sea4 Leaves Show Increased Endoreduplication

Embryos of previously described keu mutants display multi-nucleate cells; these nuclei aggregate in an enlarged nucleus in seedlings [28]. To investigate whether adult plant cells exhibit the same phenotype, we conducted flow cytometry analysis of the first pair of leaves from the sea4 mutants. As a positive control, we included den5-1, which carries a point mutation in RPL7B (encoding a ribosomal 60S subunit protein) and shows alterations in ploidy [35]. Flow cytometry revealed a decrease in populations of cells with lower ploidy levels (2C, 4C and 8C) and an increase in cell populations with higher ploidy levels (16C, 32C, 64C, and 128C; Figure S13). These altered ploidy levels were more pronounced in sea4-1 than in sea4-2, which is consistent with the more severe morphological and histological phenotypes of sea4-1 (Table S9). An increase in ploidy usually correlates with enlarged cell size [36], but we did not observed this in the sea4 mutants. Only a small subset of cells in the mutants were enlarged, and most were smaller than the wild type. Therefore, the increase in ploidy levels in cells of adult leaves can be more likely attributed to the aggregation of nuclei in cells unable to complete cytokinesis, as observed in previous studies on keu lethal seedlings.

2.6. Genes Related to Protein Folding, the Degradation of Misfolded Proteins, and Plant Immunity Are Upregulated in the sea4 Mutants

To determine whether the sea4 mutations affect biological processes beyond cytokinesis, we conducted RNA-seq analysis of Ler, sea4-1, and sea4-2 rosettes collected 14 das. In sea4-1, we identified 3812 upregulated and 3824 downregulated genes (Figure S14A and Data Set S1A). In sea4-2, we identified 4091 upregulated and 4034 downregulated genes (Figure S14B and Data Set S1B). We classified the differentially expressed genes in sea4-1 and sea4-2 by GO (Data Set S2) and KEGG pathway (Data Set S3) analyses separately for upregulated and downregulated genes.
Many upregulated genes in the sea4 mutants were related to protein folding and the degradation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Most genes involved in the Sec-dependent protein export pathway, including all those encoding the translocation channel responsible for transporting newly synthesized proteins into the ER (protein export [KEGG:ath03060]), were upregulated in the mutants. Genes related to glycosylation, protein folding, labeling of misfolded proteins, ER-associated degradation, and the unfolded protein response (UPR) were also upregulated in the mutants (protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum [KEGG:ath04141]). Additionally, most genes encoding the 19S regulatory particle and all genes encoding the 20S proteolytic core particle of the proteasome were upregulated in the mutant, as was the gene encoding the PA200 regulatory particle, which stimulates the proteasomal hydrolysis of peptides (proteasome [KEGG:ath03050]). The glycosylation of newly synthesized peptides was also affected in the mutants, as evidenced by the upregulation of genes related to glycan biosynthesis and the oligosaccharyltransferase (OST) complex, which attaches glycan to peptides at the cytoplasmatic face of the ER membrane. Furthermore, some genes involved in modifying glycans within the ER showed increased expression in the mutants (N-glycan biosynthesis [KEGG:ath00510]; various types of N-glycan biosynthesis [KEGG:ath00513]; other types of O-glycan biosynthesis [KEGG:ath00514]).
Other upregulated genes in the sea4 mutants are related to plant immunity (plant-pathogen interaction [KEGG:ath04626]; MAPK signaling pathway–plant [KEGG:ath04016]; immune response [GO:0006955]; regulation of defense response [GO:0031347]). Among genes involved in pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity, most genes of the MAPK signaling pathways triggered by pathogen infection showed increased expression in the mutants (response to bacterium [GO:0009617]; response to fungus [GO:0009620]), leading to the production of ethylene, H2O2, and cell death (cell death [GO:0008219]). Other genes involved in MAPK signaling pathways triggered by ethylene, reactive oxygen species (ROS), salt, cold, and wounding were also upregulated in the mutants (regulation of response to stress [GO:0080134]; response to wounding [GO:0009611]). Among genes associated with effector-triggered immunity, certain genes associated with the hypersensitive response (HR) to pathogen virulence proteins were upregulated in the mutants, whereas FIDDLEHEAD (FDH), which encodes a putative 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase and suppresses HR and defense responses via very-long-chain fatty acids, was downregulated. Genes involved in glucosinolate biosynthesis from methionine and aromatic amino acids, which are defense compounds in plants, were also upregulated in the mutant (glucosinolate biosynthesis [KEGG:ath00966]). Genes in the metabolic pathway of glutathione, which functions as an antioxidant against ROS, were differentially expressed in both sea4 mutants (glutathione metabolism [KEGG:ath00480]); and genes in the synthesis pathway of alpha-tocopherol and alpha-tocotrienol, which are also antioxidants, were downregulated in the sea4-1 mutants (ubiquinone and other terpenoid–quinone biosynthesis [KEGG:ath00130]).
Most genes encoding the key enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid cycle were also upregulated in the sea4 mutants (citrate cycle [KEGG:ath00020]). Additionally, several metabolic pathways responsible for producing important metabolites in plants were upregulated in the mutants. These include the pathway that synthesizes indole-3-acetic acid from tryptophan (tryptophan metabolism [KEGG:ath00380]), the pathway that produces jasmonate from phosphatidylcholine (alpha-linolenic acid metabolism [KEGG:ath00592]), the pathway that releases abscisic acid from abscisic acid glucose ester (carotenoid biosynthesis [KEGG:ath00906]), and the pathway that produces monolignols used in lignin biosynthesis (only in sea4-2; phenylpropanoid biosynthesis [KEGG:ath00940]).

2.7. Genes Related to Photosynthesis and the Production of Various Metabolites Are Downregulated in the sea4 Mutants

Among the downregulated genes in the sea4 mutants, many are related to photosynthetic processes (photosynthesis [GO:0015979]; photosynthesis, light reaction [GO:0019684]). Most genes encoding proteins of the F-type ATPase, photosystem I, and photosystem II (photosystem II assembly [GO:0010207]), and all genes encoding proteins of the photosynthetic electron transport chain and the light-harvesting chlorophyll complex (LHC) I and II, were downregulated in the mutants (photosynthesis [KEGG:ath00195]; photosynthesis–antenna proteins [KEGG:ath00196]; photosynthesis, light harvesting [GO:0009765]; photosynthetic electron transport chain [GO:0009767]). Furthermore, pathways responsible for the production of chlorophyll a/b and bacteriochlorophyll a/b from L-glutamate (porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism [KEGG:ath00860]; chlorophyll biosynthetic process [GO:0015995]; chlorophyll metabolic process [GO:0015994]); as well as alpha/beta-carotene (carotenoid biosynthesis [KEGG:ath00906]), which are essential for photosynthesis, were also downregulated in the mutants. Additionally, genes encoding proteins involved in chlorophyll degradation were upregulated (porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism [KEGG:ath00860]; porphyrin-containing compound metabolic process [GO:0006778]). In sea4-1, most genes of the synthesis pathways of phylloquinone, a photosystem I cofactor, and menaquinone, an electron transport chain component, were downregulated as well (ubiquinone and other terpenoid–quinone biosynthesis [KEGG:ath00130]). Most genes of the Calvin cycle (carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms [KEGG:ath00710]), as well as the entire pathway that converts guanosine triphosphate (GTP) into flavin mononucleotide (FMN) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), were also downregulated (riboflavin metabolism [KEGG:ath00740]).
Other downregulated genes in the sea4 mutants are related to amino acid metabolism. Genes encoding proteins involved in the conversion of glycine to glyoxylate, serine to pyruvate, and aspartate to threonine were downregulated in the mutants, although the pathway responsible for transforming serine into tryptophan was upregulated (glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism [KEGG:ath00630]; glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism [KEGG:ath00260]). The pathway involved in converting aspartate to lysine was also downregulated in sea4-2 (lysine biosynthesis [KEGG:ath00300]). Furthermore, most genes involved in the biosynthesis and degradation of valine, leucine, and isoleucine were downregulated (valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis [KEGG:ath00290]; valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation [KEGG:ath00280]). Most genes involved in the biosynthesis of aminoacyl-tRNA, which is used by ribosomes for protein assembly, were also downregulated in the mutants (aminoacyl–tRNA biosynthesis [KEGG:ath00970]).
Lastly, genes in the pathways that interconvert alpha-D-glucose-1P, pyruvate, and acetyl-CoA were downregulated in both sea4 mutants (glycolysis/gluconeogenesis [KEGG:ath00010]; pentose phosphate pathway [KEGG:ath00030]; pyruvate metabolism [KEGG:ath00620]). In sea4-1, the pathway responsible for interconverting alpha-D-glucose-1P and starch was also downregulated (starch and sucrose metabolism [KEGG:ath00500]). In addition, fatty acid metabolism was downregulated in the sea4 mutants (fatty acid metabolism [KEGG:ath01212]). In sea4-1, some genes in the pathway involved in the transformation of acetyl-CoA into malonyl-[acp], as well as most genes related to the elongation pathway, were downregulated (fatty acid biosynthesis [KEGG:ath00061]). In sea4-2, genes involved in the biosynthesis of long-chain fatty acids, which are essential for cutin and wax biosynthesis, as well as most genes of the pathway that produces biotin from malonyl-[acp], were also downregulated in the mutant (fatty acid elongation [KEGG:ath00062]; biotin metabolism [KEGG:ath00780]).

2.8. The sea4 Mutants Exhibit Altered Auxin Accumulation but Normal PIN1 Distribution

In our RNA-seq analysis, both sea4 mutants exhibited upregulation of genes related to the biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. As the production and distribution of this hormone contribute to leaf shape in Arabidopsis [37], we studied its spatial distribution in the sea4 mutants. We crossed sea4-1 and sea4-2 plants to the PIN1pro:PIN1:GFP transgenic line [38], which serves as a reporter for the PIN-FORMED1 (PIN1) auxin efflux carrier. Additionally, we crossed the sea4 mutants to the DR5revpro:GFP transgenic line [39], harboring GFP driven by the auxin-responsive synthetic promoter DR5rev.
In Col-0 leaf primordia, the PIN1pro:PIN1:GFP signal was detected in the basal region where protrusions were forming (Figure S15A–D). In the sea4 mutants, the spatial distribution of the PIN1pro:PIN1:GFP signal was similar but more confined to the primordial margins. The GFP signal intensity was also weaker, particularly in sea4-1 (Figure S15E–L). No difference in PIN1 distribution in the cells forming the primordial protrusions was observed between the sea4 mutants and the wild type (Figure S16). The DR5revpro:GFP signal was detected at the auxin maxima that formed in the margin protrusions and at the apex of Col-0 primordia, as well as in developing veins (Figure 7A–D). However, while the DR5revpro:GFP signal showed the same spatial distribution in the basal region of sea4-1 primordia as in Col-0, in the apical region of the primordia, the signal was present throughout the margin (Figure 7E–H). This change was even more pronounced in sea4-2 primordia, with the DR5revpro:GFP signal detected in some areas of the margin in the basal region of the primordia and in all epidermal cells of the apical region (Figure 7I–L), indicating substantial auxin accumulation. The distribution of auxin within the cells also appeared to differ. While in Col-0, the DR5revpro:GFP signal was relatively uniform in the cytoplasm (Figure S17A), in the sea4 mutants, this signal was only detected near the cytoplasmic membrane (Figure S17B,C).
As primary root length is reduced in the sea4 mutants, we also studied the spatial distribution of auxin in the apical root meristem using the PIN1pro:PIN1:GFP and DR5revpro:GFP reporters. The PIN1pro:PIN1:GFP signal localized to the center of the root in both Col-0 and the sea4 mutants, but its intensity was weaker in the mutants, particularly in sea4-1 (Figure S18). The distribution of PIN1 along the cytoplasmic membrane of the root cells was similar in the sea4 mutants and Col-0. However, the cell divisions in the sea4 mutants were poorly oriented, as evidenced by the PIN1pro:PIN1:GFP signal, which was more apparent in sea4-1 root cells (Figure S19). The accumulation of auxin, as indicated by the DR5revpro:GFP signal, exhibited the same spatial distribution in the sea4 mutants as in Col-0. However, the intensity of the signal was lower in the mutants, suggesting that auxin levels were reduced at the root tip (Figures S20 and S21).

3. Discussion

3.1. sea4-1 and sea4-2 Are the First Viable Recessive Alleles of KEU

Vesicle fusion is a key process in plant cytokinesis. The accurate fusion of vesicles in the appropriate orientation ultimately determines the capacity of plant tissues to grow and differentiate correctly. The presence of the KEU protein at the division plane enables the formation of trans-SNARE complexes between adjacent vesicles, resulting in the formation of the cell plate [23]. Without the activity of these complexes, vesicles fuse randomly, leading to improperly oriented cytokinesis or even preventing cytokinesis altogether [28]. This is why all previously identified null keu mutants suffer failed cytokinesis and seedling lethality. In this study, we investigated the sea4-1 and sea4-2 mutants, the first known hypomorphic alleles of KEU, which allowed for us to explore the effects of KEU gene alteration in adult plants.
The T-DNA insertional lines we studied, in which the KEU gene is interrupted at the 17th intron (keu21), or 18th exon (keu22 and keu23), and the keuMM125 mutant, which has a 100 bp deletion in the 16th exon, are homozygous lethal. We would expect the same outcome for the sea4-1 mutant allele, because its transcript encodes a SEA4-1 mutant protein that is even shorter. The viability of the sea4-1 mutant allele likely results from the combination of two factors: the small percentage of mRNA transcripts that are correctly spliced at the 9th intron and its overexpression. Together, these factors result in the expression of normal mRNA in sea4-1 at approximately 4% of the level found in wild-type Col-0. This limited expression appears to be sufficient to allow for enough vesicle fusion at the division plane during cytokinesis, allowing for the plant to complete its lifecycle.
The viability of the sea4-2 mutant allele can be explained by the observation that the S57L substitution that it causes does not significantly alter the structure of KEU. This mutation reduces the flexibility of the protein and replaces only 1 of the 41 amino acids known to physically interact with syntaxins [32]. Altogether, the sea4-2 mutation appears to reduce the capacity of KEU to interact with syntaxins and form trans-SNARE complexes between adjacent vesicles, but it does not entirely disrupt its function.

3.2. In the sea4 Mutants, Defects in Cytokinesis Seem to Reduce Cell Wall Integrity and Activate the Unfolded Protein Response

The viability of our hypomorphic alleles of KEU allowed for us to investigate their genetic interactions with related genes: those encoding its homolog SEC1B, the exocyst component SEC6, and the syntaxins SYP21, SYP132, and KN. Except for KN, the T-DNA insertional lines for the other genes were phenotypically wild type when homozygous. However, all their double mutant combinations with sea4 mutations exhibited a synergistic phenotype that was quite similar: plants with fully expanded cotyledons but leaves that failed to develop correctly. These leaves produced small protuberances emerging from the shoot apical meristem and tiny, highly serrated leaves. Surprisingly, the sea4/sea4;KN/knX37−2 sesquimutants exhibited leaves that, while wavy and serrated, were more developed than KN/knX37−2 leaves.
Previous studies have indicated that the keu mutants display some degree of polyploidy at the lethal seedling stage [28]. We confirmed that this trait persists in adult sea4 plants, with sea4-1 showing more pronounced polyploidy. Higher ploidy levels typically correlate with altered levels of gene expression [40], which we also observed in the sea4 mutants. The transcriptomic profiles of the sea4 mutants exhibit the typical alterations in gene expression observed in mutants with the so called reduced cell wall integrity: alterations in the structural and functional stability of the cell wall, such as those caused by changes in its cellulose, pectin, or hemicellulose content, or by wall damage by external causes, which lead to modifications in cellular metabolism that regulate cell cycle progression. Some examples of mutants with reduced cell wall integrity are irregular xylem1 (irx1), irx3, irx5, and isoxaben resistant1 (ixr1), which carry alleles of the CELLULOSE SYNTHASE A8 (CESA8), CESA7, CESA4, and CESA3 genes, respectively; powdery mildew-resistant5 (pmr5) and pmr6, mutated at the PMR5 and PMR6 genes, respectively, which encode two pectate lyases that depolymerize pectin; de-etiolated3 (det3) and alpha-xylosidase1-2 (xyl1-2), mutated at the DET3 and XYL1 genes, respectively, encoding proteins that modify hemicelluloses; and walls are thin1 (wat1), a mutant of the WAT1 gene, which encodes a membrane transporter and exhibits reduced secondary wall thickness [41]. Immunity is activated in reduced cell wall integrity mutants. Indeed, the sea4 mutants showed activation of PAMP- and effector-triggered immunity, increased activity of MAPK signaling pathways, and an increase in the biosynthesis of glucosinolate defense compounds. Other effects of reduced cell wall integrity include an increase in jasmonate [42] and lignin biosynthesis [43], as also observed in the sea4 mutants. The main pathway through which cell wall integrity seems to regulate cell division is via nitric oxide (NO) production, a process that triggers the degradation of cytokinin [44]. NO also plays a crucial role in preserving auxin sensitivity in Arabidopsis root tips [45]. Mutants affected in genes involved in NO biosynthesis, such as NITRIC OXIDE SYNTHASE1 (NOA1), NITRATE REDUCTASE1 (NIA1), and NIA2, exhibit shorter roots than the wild type. In these mutants, the distribution of PIN1 is similar to that of the wild type, but the expression of DR5pro:GUS is reduced [45]. In the sea4 mutants, NOA1, NIA1, and NIA2 were downregulated, resulting in a similar root phenotype. Notably, sea4 primordia maintained the same PIN1 distribution as Col-0, but DR5revpro:GFP expression significantly increased. This difference may be attributed to the strong upregulation of the metabolic pathway responsible for synthesizing indole-3-acetic acid in the sea4 mutants. This upregulation could potentially compensate for the reduced auxin sensitivity caused by the deficit in NO biosynthesis.
Defects in cytokinesis have been shown to induce the UPR, which in turn increases the activity of the ER to overcome these defects [46]. One of the principal proteins initiating the UPR pathway is INCREASED ORGAN REGENERATION1 (IRE1); our RNA-seq data show that IRE1 was upregulated in the sea4 mutants. An increase in ER activity was also observed, with higher activities of enzymes that glycosylate proteins, transport them within the ER, and fold proteins. Genes encoding ubiquitination enzymes for misfolded proteins and the proteasome were also upregulated in the mutants, which reinforces the hypothesis of UPR activation. A possible explanation for the increase in proteolysis is that the cell detects the accumulation of vesicles and proteins in the division plane and increases the degradation of newly synthesized proteins related to cytokinesis. This explanation would also account for the reduced metabolism of some amino acids, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, and biosynthesis and elongation of fatty acids, as all these components are necessary for cytokinesis and may be in excess.
Photosynthetic light harvesting and carbon fixation were also significantly affected in the sea4 mutants. Numerous genes encoding proteins of Light-Harvesting Complex I (LHCI) and II, photosystems I and II, the F-type ATPase, and the electron transport chain were downregulated in the mutants. Additionally, enzymes involved in the metabolic pathways that synthesize chlorophyll a and b and alpha- and beta-carotene were downregulated, as were enzymes responsible for carbon fixation in the Calvin cycle. A relationship between defects in cytokinesis or reduced cell wall integrity and the decrease in photosynthetic processes has not been previously observed. Perhaps due to their extended duration of cytokinesis, sea4 cells remain in the M phase of the cell cycle for a longer period, leading to a reduced requirement for carbohydrate compounds. The abovementioned downregulation might also be an early sign of senesce.

3.3. Other Phenotypic Effects of the Altered Cytokinesis Caused by the sea4 Mutations

The phenotypes observed in the sea4 mutants seem to be a direct consequence of their molecular alterations. The sea4 mutations lead to defects in cytokinesis with some degree of variability, a phenomenon previously observed in other keu mutants [28]. This variability is visible at the tissue level, where palisade mesophyll cells vary in size, and epidermal cells cannot reach the same degree of shape complexity as in the wild type. Cells of improper size disrupt tissue organization, which is also evident in the spongy mesophyll, causing non-uniform leaf thickness and resulting in bulges. This effect can also be observed in petals, leading to premature flower opening. Disruption of internal tissue organization may also affect the boundary between dorsal and ventral leaf tissues, influencing the production and distribution of mobile signals that shape lamina growth [47]. However, it is not clear that alterations in the cell division plane are responsible for the serrations in sea4 leaves. The Arabidopsis lng1-1D mutant of TRM1 have leaves with serrated margins [48], but in the maize (Zea mays) tan-1 mutant, there is no direct correlation between the orientation of cell divisions and the final shape of the leaf [5]. This is because cell divisions take place after cell elongation, which primarily determines leaf shape. Nonetheless, alterations in the cell division plane could be the cause of the reduced leaf size in the sea4 mutants, a trait that was also observed in the tan-1 mutant.
Although the distribution of the polar auxin transporter PIN1 remains unaltered in sea4 leaves, the upregulation of genes in the auxin biosynthetic pathway leads to the excess accumulation of auxin, which diffuses into regions where it should not be. This ectopic auxin distribution appears to be responsible for the serrations observed in sea4 leaves. Moreover, the presence of auxin maxima during primordia development has been linked to vascular tissue development [49,50]. The altered auxin maxima in the sea4 mutants likely accounts for their denser and more complex vascular pattern. Reduced sensitivity to auxins in the root apical meristem via NO appears to be the reason for reduced root length. This phenomenon likely also occurs in the shoot apical meristem, explaining the observed reduction in plant height.
Premature leaf senescence is another characteristic trait of the sea4 mutants. Genes related to plant immunity and MAPK signaling pathways are upregulated in these mutants due to a reduction in CWI. This activation triggers defense responses and, in some cases, cell death. Consequently, regions of the leaves with a high number of dead cells may form the senescent patches observed in these mutants. Defects in cytokinesis accumulate in each leaf over time and more mitotic events occur, explaining why younger leaves do not exhibit as many senescent patches as older leaves.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials, Growth Conditions, and Crosses

The Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. wild-type accessions Landsberg erecta (Ler) and Columbia-0 (Col-0), along with the keu-21 (SALK_101874C; N661055), keu-22 (SALK_085463; N585463), keu-23 (SALKseq_089213; N589213), sec1b-1 (GK-601G09; N457681; previously named sec1b in Karnahl et al. [31]), sec1b-2 (GK-283F10; N427142), syp21 (SAIL_580_C04; N875090), syp132T (SAIL_403_B09; N818666), sec6-2 (SALK_072337C; N660954), and sec6-3 (SALK_100970; N600970) mutants, were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Center (NASC, Nottingham, UK). The keuMM125 and knX37−2 lines [31] were kindly provided by Prof. Gerd Jürgens. The sea4-1 and sea4-2 lines were isolated in the Ler background after EMS mutagenesis in our laboratory. Subsequently, they were backcrossed twice to Ler [29]. Unless otherwise specified, all the mutants mentioned in this work are homozygous for the indicated mutations. Seed sterilization and sowing, plant culture, crosses, and allelism tests were conducted as previously described [29,51,52].

4.2. Positional Cloning and Molecular Characterization of the sea4 Mutant Alleles

Genomic DNA extraction was carried out as previously described [53]. The sea4-1 and sea4-2 mutations were initially mapped to a 660 kb candidate interval containing 250 genes using a mapping population of 79 F2 plants derived from sea4-1 × Col-0 and sea4-2 × Col-0 outcrosses and the primers listed in Table S1, as previously described [53,54]. Subsequently, the complete genomes of sea4-1 and sea4-2 were sequenced by BGI (BGI, Shenzhen, China) using the BGISEQ platform. The raw data were analyzed using Easymap v.2 [55,56,57]. Reads were aligned to the Ler genome [58]; the options used were based on the assumptions that the mutations under study were present in the reference genetic background, the mapping population resulted from a backcross, and the control sample was the parental line of the mutant strain. The reads from sea4-1 were used as the control sample for sea4-2, and vice versa.
For plant genotyping, the wild-type KEULE and sea4 mutant alleles were identified by PCR using the At1g12360-5F/R primer pair (Table S1). The presence of T-DNA insertions in the insertional lines was confirmed by PCR, and their positions were determined via Sanger sequencing. Gene- and T-DNA-specific primers (Table S1) were employed for these analyses.

4.3. Phenotypic Analysis and Morphometry

Rosettes were photographed using a Nikon SMZ1500 stereomicroscope equipped with a Nikon DXM1200F digital camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Root length was measured from photographs taken with a Canon PowerShot SX200 IS digital camera (Canon, Tokyo, Japan) using the NIS Elements AR 3.1 image analysis package (Nikon). Shoot length from the soil to the apex of the main shoot was measured in vivo using a millimeter ruler. Whole plants were photographed with a Canon PowerShot SX200 IS digital camera.

4.4. Differential Interference Contrast and Bright-Field Microscopy

For bright-field microscopy, all samples were cleared and mounted as previously described [59]. Micrographs of venation patterns were taken under bright field using a Nikon SMZ1500 stereomicroscope equipped with a Nikon DXM1200F digital camera and NIS Elements AR 3.1 software (Nikon). The venation pattern was drawn using Photoshop CS3 (Adobe, San José, CA, USA) on a Cintiq 18SX Interactive Pen Display screen (Wacom, Kazo, Japan) and analyzed using phenoVein software (https://quantitative-plant.org/software/phenovein, accessed on 31 January 2018; [60]). For epidermal and palisade mesophyll cell morphometry, leaves were collected and subjected to the following clearing steps: 15 min in 90% acetone, 24 h in 70% ethanol, and 24 h in 16 M chloral hydrate at room temperature. Microscopy of leaf tissues was performed using differential interference contrast optics on a Leica DMRB microscope equipped with a Nikon DXM1200F digital camera. Cell contours were manually outlined using Photoshop CS3 on a Cintiq 18SX Interactive Pen Display screen (Wacom). Cell area measurements were performed using the NIS Elements AR 3.1 image analysis package (Nikon). Transverse sections were obtained as described in Serrano-Cartagena et al. [61]). The tissue was embedded in Technovit 7100 resin (Kulzer, Hanau, Germany), and 5 μm sections were cut using a Microm HM350S microtome (Walldorf, Germany).

4.5. Confocal Microscopy

Confocal laser scanning microscopy images were obtained with a Leica Stellaris 8 STED confocal microscope equipped with HyD X and HyD SMD detectors, HC PL APO CS2 20×/0.75 DRY and HC PL APO CS2 40×/1.10 WATER objectives, and Leica Application Suite X software (LAS X v.4.5.0.25531; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Visualization of fluorescent proteins was performed on leaf primordia and primary roots mounted on glass slides in deionized water. GFP was excited at 489 nm with a white light laser (WLL). The emissions were acquired within the range of 494 nm to 583 nm, and TauSeparation was utilized to distinguish the GFP signal (2 ns) from the chlorophyll autofluorescence signal (0.12 ns). The image resolution was set to 1024 × 1024 pixels, with a speed of 600 Hz, a zoom factor of 0.75, and a line accumulation of 6. Ten optical sections, encompassing the adaxial to the abaxial epidermises of the primordia or the entire root thickness, were photographed and overlapped using LAS X software. The configuration of WLL intensity, transmitted light detector gain, and look-up table values for each photograph type are detailed in Table S10.

4.6. RNA-Seq Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from the samples and subjected to massive parallel sequencing as described in Navarro-Quiles et al. [62], producing paired-end reads of 150 bp (Table S11). Read mapping to the Arabidopsis genome (TAIR10) was performed using HISAT2 v2.0.5 [63] with default parameters, and differentially expressed genes between the sea4 mutants and Ler were identified by Novogene using the DESeq2 v1.20.0 R package [64]. Genes with a p-value < 0.05 adjusted with the Benjamini and Hochberg’s method and genes with a fold change > 1 were considered to be differentially expressed. Gene Ontology (GO; http://www.geneontology.org/, accessed on 15 March 2021) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG; http://www.genome.jp/kegg/, accessed on 15 March 2021) pathway enrichment analyses of the differentially expressed genes were performed by Novogene using the clusterProfiler v3.8.1 R package. Significantly enriched terms were determined with an adjusted p-value < 0.05.

4.7. Ploidy Analysis

Flow cytometry analysis was performed as previously described [65]. Briefly, first-node and second-node leaves from four different rosettes were harvested 21 das and chopped with a razor blade in 500 μL of cold nuclear isolation buffer [36]. The cell suspension was filtered through a 30 μm nylon mesh, treated with RNase A (200 μg/mL) for 20 min, and stained with propidium iodide (50 μg/mL) for 40 min. The nuclear DNA content was analyzed using a FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and the data were processed using the Floreada.io web platform (https://floreada.io, accessed on 18 October 2023). Three biological replicates (15,000 counts each) were analyzed per genotype.

4.8. Protein Sequence Alignment

The protein sequences of Arabidopsis KEU and rat SYNTAXIN-BINDING PROTEIN1 (STXBP1) were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (NCBI; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 29 March 2021; KEU: NP_563905.1; rat STXBP1: NP_037170.1). Multiple sequence alignment was performed using Clustal Omega (EMBL-EBI, Hinxton, UK; https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/, accessed on 18 March 2021; [66]).

4.9. Protein Structure Visualization and Analysis

The 3D structures of the full-length monomers of KEU and rat STXBP1 were obtained from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/, accessed on 11 April 2023; [67,68]; KEU: AF-Q9C5X3-F1; rat STXBP1: AF-P61765-F1) and visualized using UCSF ChimeraX 1.2.5 software (https://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimerax/, accessed on 11 April 2023; [69,70]). To analyze the impact of the S57L substitution in sea4-2 on the conformational stability and dynamics of KEU, two web structure-based protein stability predictors were used: DynaMut (https://biosig.lab.uq.edu.au/dynamut/, accessed on 11 April 2023; [71]) and DynaMut2 (https://biosig.lab.uq.edu.au/dynamut2/, accessed on 11 April 2023; [72]). These predictors quantify the difference in unfolding Gibbs free energy (ΔΔG, expressed in kcal∙mol−1) between wild-type and mutant proteins, classifying mutations as stabilizing when ΔΔG > 0 kcal∙mol−1 or destabilizing when ΔΔG < 0 kcal∙mol−1. DynaMut provides ΔΔG results from three additional predictors: SDM [73], mCSM [74], and DUET [75]. Furthermore, it computes the difference in vibrational entropy energy (ΔΔSVib, expressed in kcal∙mol−1∙K−1) between wild-type and mutant proteins using the ENCoM server [76], classifying mutations as rigidifying if ΔΔSVib < 0 kcal∙mol−1∙K−1 or flexibilizing if ΔΔSVib > 0 kcal∙mol−1∙K−1. Finally, Missense3D (http://missense3d.bc.ic.ac.uk/missense3d/, accessed on 11 April 2023; [77]) was used to predict possible damaging structural effects of the S57L substitution on KEU protein.

4.10. Accession Numbers

Sequence data from this article can be found at The Arabidopsis Information Resource (https://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 23 January 2020) under the following accession numbers: KEU (At1g12360), KN (At1g08560), SEC1B (At4g12120), SYP21 (At5g16830), SYP132 (At5g08080), and SEC6 (At1g71820).

5. Conclusions

The SM protein KEU has a known, important role in cytokinesis, where it coordinates the assembly of trans-SNARE complexes in vesicle fusion at the cell plate. Here, we studied the first hypomorphic, viable alleles of the KEU gene, sea4-1 and sea4-2, which will serve as valuable resources for future research on the role of KEULE in regulating cytokinesis in postembryonic developmental stages. In sea4-1, a transition at the splice donor site of the ninth exon leads to mis-splicing, yielding a truncated protein. In sea4-2, a transition in the third exon causes a S57L substitution, which impacts an amino acid crucial for physical interactions with syntaxins and reduces the protein flexibility. In these viable mutants, cytokinesis is impaired but not abolished, allowing for the functional study of the roles that KEU plays in vegetative and reproductive development. Our RNA-seq study of sea4 plants strongly suggests that their phenotypes are associated with activation of the unfolded protein response and reduction in cell wall integrity. The characteristic early leaf senescence of sea4 plants seems to be caused by the activation of plant immunity and the increase in jasmonate biosynthesis, two typical traits of mutants with reduced cell wall integrity. Their short primary shoots and roots are also likely to be a consequence of a reduction in auxin sensitivity at the meristems due to a decrease in NO biosynthesis, another typical trait of mutants with reduced cell wall integrity. We propose that the sea4 mutants compensate for reduced auxin sensitivity by upregulating auxin biosynthesis, which results in ectopic diffusion within leaf primordia. This leads to leaf margin serrations and a dense, complex venation pattern. The sea4 leaf surface displays protuberances caused by internal tissue disorganization due to cytokinesis defects. Such disorganization seems to disrupt the boundaries between tissues that regulate leaf morphogenesis and may also contribute to the formation of serrated leaf margins. The sea4 mutants also exhibit a reduction in photosynthetic light harvesting and carbon fixation, a phenomenon not previously linked to either cell wall integrity or the unfolded protein response, but that could be related to the delay in cytokinesis caused by the sea4 mutations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25126667/s1.

Author Contributions

J.L.M. conceived, designed, and supervised the research, provided resources, and obtained funding. Several experiments were codesigned by A.R.-B., R.S.-M., J.L.M. and A.R.-B. performed most of the experiments. R.M.-V., F.M.L. and M.R.P. performed the low-resolution mapping of sea4-1 and sea4-2. C.C.-R. contributed to the phenotypic analysis of the sea4 mutants. A.R.-B. and J.L.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research in the laboratory of J.L.M. was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of Spain [PID2021-127725NB-I00 (MCI/AEI/FEDER, UE)] and the Generalitat Valenciana [CIPROM/2022/2].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data from genome resequencing and RNA-seq have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/, accessed on 24 February 2024) under accession numbers PRJNA1079917 and PRJNA1079902, respectively.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to G. Jürgens for providing seeds; J. Castelló, J.M. Serrano, and M.J. Ñíguez for their excellent technical assistance; and A.M. Aguilar-García, Á. Valdés-Penalva, and E. Peñataro-González for their contributions to the phenotypic characterization of the sea4 mutants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Müller, S.; Jürgens, G. Plant cytokinesis—No ring, no constriction but centrifugal construction of the partitioning membrane. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 53, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Thiele, K.; Wanner, G.; Kindzierski, V.; Jürgens, G.; Mayer, U.; Pachl, F.; Assaad, F.F. The timely deposition of callose is essential for cytokinesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009, 58, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Struk, S.; Dhonukshe, P. MAPs: Cellular navigators for microtubule array orientations in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Drevensek, S.; Goussot, M.; Duroc, Y.; Christodoulidou, A.; Steyaert, S.; Schaefer, E.; Duvernois, E.; Grandjean, O.; Vantard, M.; Bouchez, D.; et al. The Arabidopsis TRM1–TON1 interaction reveals a recruitment network common to plant cortical microtubule arrays and eukaryotic centrosomes. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 178–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Smith, L.G.; Hake, S.; Sylvester, A.W. The tangled-1 mutation alters cell division orientations throughout maize leaf development without altering leaf shape. Development 1996, 122, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wiedemeier, A.M.D.; Judy-March, J.E.; Hocart, C.H.; Wasteneys, G.O.; Williamson, R.E.; Baskin, T.I. Mutant alleles of Arabidopsis RADIALLY SWOLLEN 4 and 7 reduce growth anisotropy without altering the transverse orientation of cortical microtubules or cellulose microfibrils. Development 2002, 129, 4821–4830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Steinborn, K.; Maulbetsch, C.; Priester, B.; Trautmann, S.; Pacher, T.; Geiges, B.; Küttner, F.; Lepiniec, L.; Stierhof, Y.D.; Schwarz, H.; et al. The Arabidopsis PILZ group genes encode tubulin-folding cofactor orthologs required for cell division but not cell growth. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 959–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Krupnova, T.; Sasabe, M.; Ghebreghiorghis, L.; Gruber, C.W.; Hamada, T.; Dehmel, V.; Strompen, G.; Stierhof, Y.D.; Lukowitz, W.; Kemmerling, B.; et al. Microtubule-associated kinase-like protein RUNKEL needed for cell plate expansion in Arabidopsis cytokinesis. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 518–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Strompen, G.; El Kasmi, F.; Richter, S.; Lukowitz, W.; Assaad, F.F.; Jürgens, G.; Mayer, U. The Arabidopsis HINKEL gene encodes a kinesin-related protein involved in cytokinesis and is expressed in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Müller, S.; Fuchs, E.; Ovecka, M.; Wysocka-Diller, J.; Benfey, P.N.; Hauser, M.T. Two new loci, PLEIADE and HYADE, implicate organ-specific regulation of cytokinesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 312–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Söllner, R.; Glässer, G.; Wanner, G.; Somerville, C.R.; Jürgens, G.; Assaad, F.F. Cytokinesis-defective mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129, 678–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lukowitz, W.; Mayer, U.; Jürgens, G. Cytokinesis in the Arabidopsis embryo involves the syntaxin-related KNOLLE gene product. Cell 1996, 84, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Assaad, F.F.; Huet, Y.; Mayer, U.; Jürgens, G. The cytokinesis gene KEULE encodes a Sec1 protein that binds the syntaxin KNOLLE. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 152, 531–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hong, Z.; Delauney, A.J.; Verma, D.P. A cell plate-specific callose synthase and its interaction with phragmoplastin. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 755–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fagard, M.; Desnos, T.; Desprez, T.; Goubet, F.; Refregier, G.; Mouille, G.; McCann, M.; Rayon, C.; Vernhettes, S.; Höfte, H. PROCUSTE1 encodes a cellulose synthase required for normal cell elongation specifically in roots and dark-grown hypocotyls of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 2409–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Williamson, R.E.; Burn, J.E.; Birch, R.; Baskin, T.I.; Arioli, T.; Betzner, A.S.; Cork, A. Morphology of rsw1, a cellulose-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Protoplasma 2001, 215, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nickle, T.C.; Meinke, D.W. A cytokinesis-defective mutant of Arabidopsis (cyt1) characterized by embryonic lethality, incomplete cell walls, and excessive callose accumulation. Plant J. 1998, 15, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zuo, J.; Niu, Q.W.; Nishizawa, N.; Wu, Y.; Kost, B.; Chua, N.H. KORRIGAN, an Arabidopsis endo-1,4-β-glucanase, localizes to the cell plate by polarized targeting and is essential for cytokinesis. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1137–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jürgens, G. Plant cytokinesis: Fission by fusion. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Blatt, M.R.; Leyman, B.; Geelen, D. Tansley review No. 108: Molecular events of vesicle trafficking and control by SNARE proteins in plants. New Phytol. 1999, 144, 389–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lupashin, V.; Sztul, E. Golgi tethering factors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1744, 325–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Thellmann, M.; Rybak, K.; Thiele, K.; Wanner, G.; Assaad, F.F. Tethering factors required for cytokinesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 720–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Park, M.; Touihri, S.; Müller, I.; Mayer, U.; Jürgens, G. Sec1/Munc18 protein stabilizes fusion-competent syntaxin for membrane fusion in Arabidopsis cytokinesis. Dev. Cell 2012, 22, 989–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fukuda, R.; McNew, J.A.; Weber, T.; Parlati, F.; Engel, T.; Nickel, W.; Rothman, J.E.; Söllner, T.H. Functional architecture of an intracellular membrane t-SNARE. Nature 2000, 407, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Margittai, M.; Widengren, J.; Schweinberger, E.; Schröder, G.F.; Felekyan, S.; Haustein, E.; König, M.; Fasshauer, D.; Grubmüller, H.; Jahn, R.; et al. Single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer reveals a dynamic equilibrium between closed and open conformations of syntaxin 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 15516–15521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Heese, M.; Gansel, X.; Sticher, L.; Wick, P.; Grebe, M.; Granier, F.; Jürgens, G. Functional characterization of the KNOLLE-interacting t-SNARE AtSNAP33 and its role in plant cytokinesis. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 155, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Karnik, R.; Grefen, C.; Bayne, R.; Honsbein, A.; Köhler, T.; Kioumourtzoglou, D.; Williams, M.; Bryant, N.J.; Blatt, M.R. Arabidopsis Sec1/Munc18 protein SEC11 is a competitive and dynamic modulator of SNARE binding and SYP121-dependent vesicle traffic. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 1368–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Assaad, F.F.; Mayer, U.; Wanner, G.; Jürgens, G. The KEULE gene is involved in cytokinesis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1996, 253, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Berná, G.; Robles, P.; Micol, J.L. A mutational analysis of leaf morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 1999, 152, 729–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Robles, P.; Micol, J.L. Genome-wide linkage analysis of Arabidopsis genes required for leaf development. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2001, 266, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Karnahl, M.; Park, M.; Krause, C.; Hiller, U.; Mayer, U.; Stierhof, Y.D.; Jürgens, G. Functional diversification of Arabidopsis SEC1-related SM proteins in cytokinetic and secretory membrane fusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 6309–6314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Misura, K.M.S.; Scheller, R.H.; Weis, W.I. Three-dimensional structure of the neuronal-Sec1–syntaxin 1a complex. Nature 2000, 404, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wu, J.; Tan, X.; Wu, C.; Cao, K.; Li, Y.; Bao, Y. Regulation of cytokinesis by exocyst subunit SEC6 and KEULE in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 1863–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Waizenegger, I.; Lukowitz, W.; Assaad, F.; Schwarz, H.; Jürgens, G.; Mayer, U. The Arabidopsis KNOLLE and KEULE genes interact to promote vesicle fusion during cytokinesis. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10, 1371–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Horiguchi, G.; Mollá-Morales, A.; Pérez-Pérez, J.M.; Kojima, K.; Robles, P.; Ponce, M.R.; Micol, J.L.; Tsukaya, H. Differential contributions of ribosomal protein genes to Arabidopsis thaliana leaf development. Plant J. 2011, 65, 724–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Galbraith, D.W.; Harkins, K.R.; Knapp, S. Systemic endopolyploidy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1991, 96, 985–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bilsborough, G.D.; Runions, A.; Barkoulas, M.; Jenkins, H.W.; Hasson, A.; Galinha, C.; Laufs, P.; Hay, A.; Prusinkiewicz, P.; Tsiantis, M. Model for the regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf margin development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3424–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, J.; Hofhuis, H.; Heidstra, R.; Sauer, M.; Friml, J.; Scheres, B. A molecular framework for plant regeneration. Science 2006, 311, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Friml, J.; Vieten, A.; Sauer, M.; Weijers, D.; Schwarz, H.; Hamann, T.; Offringa, R.; Jürgens, G. Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical-basal axis of Arabidopsis. Nature 2003, 426, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bomblies, K.; Madlung, A. Polyploidy in the Arabidopsis genus. Chromosome Res. 2014, 22, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bacete, L.; Mélida, H.; Miedes, E.; Molina, A. Plant cell wall-mediated immunity: Cell wall changes trigger disease resistance responses. Plant J. 2018, 93, 614–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ellis, C.; Karafyllidis, I.; Wasternack, C.; Turner, J.G. The Arabidopsis mutant cev1 links cell wall signaling to jasmonate and ethylene responses. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 1557–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Caño-Delgado, A.; Penfield, S.; Smith, C.; Catley, M.; Bevan, M. Reduced cellulose synthesis invokes lignification and defense responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2003, 34, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gigli-Bisceglia, N.; Engelsdorf, T.; Strnad, M.; Vaahtera, L.; Khan, G.A.; Yamoune, A.; Alipanah, L.; Novák, O.; Persson, S.; Hejatko, J.; et al. Cell wall integrity modulates Arabidopsis thaliana cell cycle gene expression in a cytokinin- and nitrate reductase-dependent manner. Development 2018, 145, dev166678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sanz, L.; Fernández-Marcos, M.; Modrego, A.; Lewis, D.R.; Muday, G.K.; Pollmann, S.; Dueñas, M.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Lorenzo, O. Nitric oxide plays a role in stem cell niche homeostasis through its interaction with auxin. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1972–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bicknell, A.A.; Babour, A.; Federovitch, C.M.; Niwa, M. A novel role in cytokinesis reveals a housekeeping function for the unfolded protein response. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 177, 1017–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Caggiano, M.P.; Yu, X.; Bhatia, N.; Larsson, A.; Ram, H.; Ohno, C.K.; Sappl, P.; Meyerowitz, E.M.; Jönsson, H.; Heisler, M.G. Cell type boundaries organize plant development. eLife 2017, 6, e27421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, Y.K.; Kim, G.T.; Kim, I.J.; Park, J.; Kwak, S.S.; Choi, G.; Chung, W.I. LONGIFOLIA1 and LONGIFOLIA2, two homologous genes, regulate longitudinal cell elongation in Arabidopsis. Development 2006, 133, 4305–4314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Aloni, R.; Schwalm, K.; Langhans, M.; Ullrich, C.I. Gradual shifts in sites of free-auxin production during leaf-primordium development and their role in vascular differentiation and leaf morphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Planta 2003, 216, 841–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Teale, W.D.; Paponov, I.A.; Palme, K. Auxin in action: Signalling, transport and the control of plant growth and development. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 847–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ponce, M.R.; Quesada, V.; Micol, J.L. Rapid discrimination of sequences flanking and within T-DNA insertions in the Arabidopsis genome. Plant J. 1998, 14, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Quesada, V.; Ponce, M.R.; Micol, J.L. Genetic analysis of salt-tolerant mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2000, 154, 421–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ponce, M.R.; Robles, P.; Lozano, F.M.; Brotóns, M.A.; Micol, J.L. Low-resolution mapping of untagged mutations. Methods Mol. Biol. 2006, 323, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ponce, M.R.; Robles, P.; Micol, J.L. High-throughput genetic mapping in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1999, 261, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lup, S.D.; Wilson-Sánchez, D.; Andreu-Sánchez, S.; Micol, J.L. Easymap: A user-friendly software package for rapid mapping-by-sequencing of point mutations and large insertions. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 655286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lup, S.D.; Wilson-Sánchez, D.; Micol, J.L. Mapping-by-sequencing of point and insertional mutations with Easymap. Methods Mol. Biol. 2022, 2484, 343–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lup, S.D.; Navarro-Quiles, C.; Micol, J.L. Versatile mapping-by-sequencing with Easymap v.2. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1042913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zapata, L.; Ding, J.; Willing, E.M.; Hartwig, B.; Bezdan, D.; Jiao, W.B.; Patel, V.; Velikkakam James, G.; Koornneef, M.; Ossowski, S.; et al. Chromosome-level assembly of Arabidopsis thaliana Ler reveals the extent of translocation and inversion polymorphisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E4052–E4060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Candela, H.; Martínez-Laborda, A.; Micol, J.L. Venation pattern formation in Arabidopsis thaliana vegetative leaves. Dev. Biol. 1999, 205, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bühler, J.; Rishmawi, L.; Pflugfelder, D.; Huber, G.; Scharr, H.; Hülskamp, M.; Koornneef, M.; Schurr, U.; Jahnke, S. phenoVein―A tool for leaf vein segmentation and analysis. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2359–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Serrano-Cartagena, J.; Candela, H.; Robles, P.; Ponce, M.R.; Pérez-Pérez, J.M.; Piqueras, P.; Micol, J.L. Genetic analysis of incurvata mutants reveals three independent genetic operations at work in Arabidopsis leaf morphogenesis. Genetics 2000, 156, 1363–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Navarro-Quiles, C.; Mateo-Bonmatí, E.; Candela, H.; Robles, P.; Martínez-Laborda, A.; Fernández, Y.; Simura, J.; Ljung, K.; Rubio, V.; Ponce, M.R.; et al. The Arabidopsis ATP-Binding Cassette E protein ABCE2 is a conserved component of the translation machinery. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1009895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kim, D.; Paggi, J.M.; Park, C.; Bennett, C.; Salzberg, S.L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 907–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Desvoyes, B.; Ramirez-Parra, E.; Xie, Q.; Chua, N.H.; Gutierrez, C. Cell type-specific role of the retinoblastoma/E2F pathway during Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Madeira, F.; Park, Y.M.; Lee, J.; Buso, N.; Gur, T.; Madhusoodanan, N.; Basutkar, P.; Tivey, A.R.N.; Potter, S.C.; Finn, R.D.; et al. The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W636–W641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Adler, J.; Wu, Z.; Green, T.; Zielinski, M.; Žídek, A.; Bridgland, A.; Cowie, A.; Meyer, C.; Laydon, A.; et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome. Nature 2021, 596, 590–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Varadi, M.; Anyango, S.; Deshpande, M.; Nair, S.; Natassia, C.; Yordanova, G.; Yuan, D.; Stroe, O.; Wood, G.; Laydon, A.; et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: Massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D439–D444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Goddard, T.D.; Huang, C.C.; Meng, E.C.; Pettersen, E.F.; Couch, G.S.; Morris, J.H.; Ferrin, T.E. UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 2018, 27, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pettersen, E.F.; Goddard, T.D.; Huang, C.C.; Meng, E.C.; Couch, G.S.; Croll, T.I.; Morris, J.H.; Ferrin, T.E. UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 2021, 30, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rodrigues, C.H.M.; Pires, D.E.V.; Ascher, D.B. DynaMut: Predicting the impact of mutations on protein conformation, flexibility and stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W350–W355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rodrigues, C.H.M.; Pires, D.E.V.; Ascher, D.B. DynaMut2: Assessing changes in stability and flexibility upon single and multiple point missense mutations. Protein Sci. 2021, 30, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Worth, C.L.; Preissner, R.; Blundell, T.L. SDM―A server for predicting effects of mutations on protein stability and malfunction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W215–W222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Pires, D.E.V.; Ascher, D.B.; Blundell, T.L. mCSM: Predicting the effects of mutations in proteins using graph-based signatures. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Pires, D.E.V.; Ascher, D.B.; Blundell, T.L. DUET: A server for predicting effects of mutations on protein stability using an integrated computational approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, W314–W319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Frappier, V.; Chartier, M.; Najmanovich, R.J. ENCoM server: Exploring protein conformational space and the effect of mutations on protein function and stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W395–W400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ittisoponpisan, S.; Islam, S.A.; Khanna, T.; Alhuzimi, E.; David, A.; Sternberg, M.J.E. Can predicted protein 3D structures provide reliable insights into whether missense variants are disease associated? J. Mol. Biol. 2019, 431, 2197–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mapping of the sea4-1 and sea4-2 mutations. (A) Analysis of a mapping population of 79 F2 plants derived from a sea4-1 × Col-0 cross revealed a candidate interval of 660 kb on chromosome 1 containing 250 genes. The names and physical map positions of the molecular markers used for linkage analysis are shown. The number of recombinant chromosomes found is indicated in parentheses. (B) Plots showing the allele frequency of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) versus positions in a mapping-by-sequencing analysis of the sea4 mutants performed using Easymap v.2. SNPs are represented as blue dots, the candidate region is shaded in pink, and the average allele frequency (AF) in the test sample of SNPs used for mapping is represented by a green line. (C) Structure of the KEU gene showing the nature and positions of the sea4 and keu mutations studied in this work. Boxes and lines between boxes indicate exons and introns, respectively. White boxes represent the 5′- and 3′-UTRs. Triangles indicate the T-DNA insertions in keu-21, keu-22, and keu-23, and the ⊣ and ⊢ symbols delimitate the deletion in keuMM125.
Figure 1. Mapping of the sea4-1 and sea4-2 mutations. (A) Analysis of a mapping population of 79 F2 plants derived from a sea4-1 × Col-0 cross revealed a candidate interval of 660 kb on chromosome 1 containing 250 genes. The names and physical map positions of the molecular markers used for linkage analysis are shown. The number of recombinant chromosomes found is indicated in parentheses. (B) Plots showing the allele frequency of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) versus positions in a mapping-by-sequencing analysis of the sea4 mutants performed using Easymap v.2. SNPs are represented as blue dots, the candidate region is shaded in pink, and the average allele frequency (AF) in the test sample of SNPs used for mapping is represented by a green line. (C) Structure of the KEU gene showing the nature and positions of the sea4 and keu mutations studied in this work. Boxes and lines between boxes indicate exons and introns, respectively. White boxes represent the 5′- and 3′-UTRs. Triangles indicate the T-DNA insertions in keu-21, keu-22, and keu-23, and the ⊣ and ⊢ symbols delimitate the deletion in keuMM125.
Ijms 25 06667 g001
Figure 2. Leaf phenotypes and complementation analysis of the sea4 and keu mutants studied in this work. Rosettes of wild-type (A) Col-0 and (B) Ler, the (C) sea4-1/sea4-1 and (D) sea4-2/sea4-2 homozygous mutants, and the (E) sea4-1/keu-21, (F) sea4-2/keu-21, (G) sea4-1/keu-22, (H) sea4-2/keu-22, (I) sea4-1/keu-23, (J) sea4-2/keu-23, (K) sea4-1/keuMM125, and (L) sea4-2/keuMM125 heterozygotes. Photographs were taken 14 das. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Figure 2. Leaf phenotypes and complementation analysis of the sea4 and keu mutants studied in this work. Rosettes of wild-type (A) Col-0 and (B) Ler, the (C) sea4-1/sea4-1 and (D) sea4-2/sea4-2 homozygous mutants, and the (E) sea4-1/keu-21, (F) sea4-2/keu-21, (G) sea4-1/keu-22, (H) sea4-2/keu-22, (I) sea4-1/keu-23, (J) sea4-2/keu-23, (K) sea4-1/keuMM125, and (L) sea4-2/keuMM125 heterozygotes. Photographs were taken 14 das. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Ijms 25 06667 g002
Figure 3. Venation patterns of sea4-1 and sea4-2 cotyledons and first- and third-node leaves. Representative diagrams of fully expanded (AC) cotyledons, (DF) first-node leaves, and (GI) third-node leaves from (A,D,G) Ler, (B,E,H) sea4-1, and (C,F,I) sea4-2 plants. Margins are drawn in orange and veins in black. The line thickness does not represent the actual thickness of the veins. Cotyledons and leaves were collected 21 das. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Figure 3. Venation patterns of sea4-1 and sea4-2 cotyledons and first- and third-node leaves. Representative diagrams of fully expanded (AC) cotyledons, (DF) first-node leaves, and (GI) third-node leaves from (A,D,G) Ler, (B,E,H) sea4-1, and (C,F,I) sea4-2 plants. Margins are drawn in orange and veins in black. The line thickness does not represent the actual thickness of the veins. Cotyledons and leaves were collected 21 das. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Ijms 25 06667 g003
Figure 4. Internal structure of sea4 third-node leaves. Transverse sections of leaves from (A,D) Ler, (B,E) sea4-1, and (C,F) sea4-2 plants stained with toluidine blue. Photographs show (AC) a complete transverse section of the lamina from margin to margin, and (DF) the central zone of the lamina between the primary vein and margin, which is marked with a rectangle in (AC). Photographs were taken 21 das. Scale bars: 1 mm.
Figure 4. Internal structure of sea4 third-node leaves. Transverse sections of leaves from (A,D) Ler, (B,E) sea4-1, and (C,F) sea4-2 plants stained with toluidine blue. Photographs show (AC) a complete transverse section of the lamina from margin to margin, and (DF) the central zone of the lamina between the primary vein and margin, which is marked with a rectangle in (AC). Photographs were taken 21 das. Scale bars: 1 mm.
Ijms 25 06667 g004
Figure 5. Structure of the cell layers in third-node leaves of the sea4 mutants. (AI) Diagrams of cells from the (A,D,G) palisade mesophyll, (B,E,H) adaxial epidermis, and (C,F,I) abaxial epidermis of (AC) Ler, (DF) sea4-1, and (GI) sea4-2 plants. Leaves were collected 21 das. Scale bars: 20 μm. (JL) Violin plots representing the distribution of cell sizes in the (J) palisade mesophyll (n = 742–982), (K) adaxial epidermis (n = 262–424), and (L) abaxial epidermis (n = 214–490). The median is represented with a circle.
Figure 5. Structure of the cell layers in third-node leaves of the sea4 mutants. (AI) Diagrams of cells from the (A,D,G) palisade mesophyll, (B,E,H) adaxial epidermis, and (C,F,I) abaxial epidermis of (AC) Ler, (DF) sea4-1, and (GI) sea4-2 plants. Leaves were collected 21 das. Scale bars: 20 μm. (JL) Violin plots representing the distribution of cell sizes in the (J) palisade mesophyll (n = 742–982), (K) adaxial epidermis (n = 262–424), and (L) abaxial epidermis (n = 214–490). The median is represented with a circle.
Ijms 25 06667 g005
Figure 6. Leaf phenotypes of double mutant combinations between the sea4 mutant alleles and mutations in genes involved in membrane fusion. Rosettes of wild-type (A) Ler and (B) Col-0; the (C) sea4-1, (D) sea4-2, (E) sec1b-1, (F) sec1b-2, (G) sec6-2, (H) sec6-3, (I) syp21, (J) syp132T, and (K) KN/knX37−2 mutants; (L,M) sea4 sec1b-1, (N,O) sea4 sec1b-2, (P,Q) sea4 sec6-2, (R,S) sea4 sec6-3, (T,U) sea4 syp21, and (V,W) sea4 syp132T double mutants; and (X,Y) the sea4 KN/knX37−2 sesquimutants. Photographs were taken 14 das. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Figure 6. Leaf phenotypes of double mutant combinations between the sea4 mutant alleles and mutations in genes involved in membrane fusion. Rosettes of wild-type (A) Ler and (B) Col-0; the (C) sea4-1, (D) sea4-2, (E) sec1b-1, (F) sec1b-2, (G) sec6-2, (H) sec6-3, (I) syp21, (J) syp132T, and (K) KN/knX37−2 mutants; (L,M) sea4 sec1b-1, (N,O) sea4 sec1b-2, (P,Q) sea4 sec6-2, (R,S) sea4 sec6-3, (T,U) sea4 syp21, and (V,W) sea4 syp132T double mutants; and (X,Y) the sea4 KN/knX37−2 sesquimutants. Photographs were taken 14 das. Scale bars: 2 mm.
Ijms 25 06667 g006
Figure 7. Expression pattern of the DR5revpro:GFP reporter in leaf primordia of the sea4 mutants (20×). The visualization of DR5revpro:GFP (green) expression in leaf primordia from successive nodes (8th–11th) is shown for (AD) Col-0, (EH) sea4-1, and (IL) sea4-2 plants. Chlorophyll autofluorescence is shown in red. The primordia were collected 20 das. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.
Figure 7. Expression pattern of the DR5revpro:GFP reporter in leaf primordia of the sea4 mutants (20×). The visualization of DR5revpro:GFP (green) expression in leaf primordia from successive nodes (8th–11th) is shown for (AD) Col-0, (EH) sea4-1, and (IL) sea4-2 plants. Chlorophyll autofluorescence is shown in red. The primordia were collected 20 das. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.
Ijms 25 06667 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruiz-Bayón, A.; Cara-Rodríguez, C.; Sarmiento-Mañús, R.; Muñoz-Viana, R.; Lozano, F.M.; Ponce, M.R.; Micol, J.L. Roles of the Arabidopsis KEULE Gene in Postembryonic Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126667

AMA Style

Ruiz-Bayón A, Cara-Rodríguez C, Sarmiento-Mañús R, Muñoz-Viana R, Lozano FM, Ponce MR, Micol JL. Roles of the Arabidopsis KEULE Gene in Postembryonic Development. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(12):6667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126667

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruiz-Bayón, Alejandro, Carolina Cara-Rodríguez, Raquel Sarmiento-Mañús, Rafael Muñoz-Viana, Francisca M. Lozano, María Rosa Ponce, and José Luis Micol. 2024. "Roles of the Arabidopsis KEULE Gene in Postembryonic Development" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 12: 6667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126667

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop