Next Article in Journal
GmANKTM21 Positively Regulates Drought Tolerance and Enhanced Stomatal Response through the MAPK Signaling Pathway in Soybean
Next Article in Special Issue
Growth Properties and Metabolomic Analysis Provide Insight into Drought Tolerance in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Cell Therapies for Acute Radiation Syndrome
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification of NDPK Family Genes and Expression Analysis under Abiotic Stress in Brassica napus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The White Clover TrMYB33-TrSAMS1 Module Contributes to Drought Tolerance by Modulation of Spermidine Biosynthesis via an ABA-Dependent Pathway

College of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(13), 6974; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136974
Submission received: 6 May 2024 / Revised: 12 June 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 26 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Plant Abiotic Stress)

Abstract

:
Spermidine is well known to accumulate in plants exposed to drought, but the regulatory network associated with its biosynthesis and accumulation and the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we demonstrated that the Trifolium repens TrMYB33 relayed the ABA signal to modulate drought-induced spermidine production by directly regulating the expression of TrSAMS1, which encodes an S-adenosylmethionine synthase. This gene was identified by transcriptome and expression analysis in T. repens. TrSAMS1 overexpression and its pTRV-VIGS-mediated silencing demonstrated that TrSAMS1 is a positive regulator of spermidine synthesis and drought tolerance. TrMYB33 was identified as an interacting candidate through yeast one-hybrid library screening with the TrSAMS1 promoter region as the bait. TrMYB33 was confirmed to bind directly to the predicted TAACCACTAACCA (the TAACCA MYB binding site is repeated twice in tandem) within the TrSAMS1 promoter and to act as a transcriptional activator. Additionally, TrMYB33 contributed to drought tolerance by regulating TrSAMS1 expression and modulating spermidine synthesis. Additionally, we found that spermidine accumulation under drought stress depended on ABA and that TrMYB33 coordinated ABA-mediated upregulation of TrSAMS1 and spermidine accumulation. This study elucidated the role of a T. repens MYB33 homolog in modulating spermidine biosynthesis. The further exploitation and functional characterization of the TrMYB33–TrSAMS1 regulatory module can enhance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms responsible for spermidine accumulation during drought stress.

1. Introduction

Plants are often subjected to various abiotic stresses, with drought being one of the most stress-inducing environmental conditions; it severely limits plant growth and development [1], as well as crop productivity and quality. When experiencing water scarcity, plants react by undergoing various physiological and biochemical adaptations to enhance their resistance to drought. Consequently, elucidating the changes that allow plants to alleviate drought-related damage will provide valuable knowledge for understanding the complex reprograming governing plant adaptation to and tolerance of drought stress.
Plants have developed the capacity to endure drought stress as a result of their adaptation to water scarcity. Transcriptional functional rearrangement of drought-responsive regulatory genes has been recognized as a key mechanism in this process [2,3,4]. Progress has been made in the identification and classification of molecules that are involved in the regulation of drought stress responses, especially regarding transcription factors (TFs) and their target genes. Research and findings by Chen et al. [5], Thirumalaikumar et al. [6], Ma et al. [7], Li et al. [8], and Ju et al. [9] have significantly contributed to this progress. MYBs, among other TFs, have been documented to play a significant role in regulating drought stress tolerance. MYB TFs are classified based on the number of repeats in their structure, which ranges from one to four. The TFs are also characterized by their DNA-binding domains. The most prevalent MYB TFs in plants belong to the R2R3-MYB subfamily and are crucial in drought stress responses [10]. Despite the limited number of 3R-MYBs, OsMYB3R-2 [11] and TaMYB3R1 [12], members of this class, are involved in plant responses to drought stress. Based on transcriptomic studies in Arabidopsis thaliana, 51% of AtMYB genes are upregulated [13] under drought stress. Additionally, MYBs have been functionally characterized and were shown to be involved in drought stress responses [14]. AtMYB77 [15] and AtMYB60 [16] are involved in lateral root growth. Arabidopsis plants overexpressing AtMYB60 exhibited increased root mass when grown on MS plates containing mannitol. Silencing NbPHAN (a member of the R2R3-type MYB subfamily) altered the leaf shape, caused ectopic growth, and reduced the expression of drought-related genes. All these genes were highly expressed under water-deficit conditions. Although some studies have suggested MYBs’ involvement in the drought response, the regulatory network and the target gene (s) of MYBs in response to drought stress remain unclear.
Furthermore, MYBs also function as master regulators to coordinate ABA-mediated responses. For example, AtMYB96 is a crucial factor that coordinates ABA signaling to govern lateral-root development in water-limited environments, and its expression is considerably induced by ABA [17]. On the other hand, ABA treatment down-regulated VvMYB60 expression [18]. AtMYB20-overexpressing Arabidopsis displayed no sensitivity to ABA and heightened susceptibility to desiccation, while increased ABA sensitivity and resistance to desiccation were observed in AtMYB20 knock-out plants [19]. AtMYB61 also appears to regulate stomatal aperture in an ABA-independent manner [20]. However, the networks coordinating ABA and MYBs in drought responses require further investigation.
Many genes are expressed under water-deficit conditions in plants [21], and some participate in the biosynthesis of protective metabolites known as polyamines (PAs) [22]. PAs are beneficial to plants, as they promote protein homeostasis and detoxify reactive oxygen species (ROS) [23]. Indeed, the levels of PAs have been shown to significantly increase in plants exposed to drought. These changes primarily affect PA metabolism and other signaling pathways [24,25]. Putrescine (Put), spermidine (Spd), and spermine (Spm) are the most abundant PAs. In plants, ornithine or arginine undergoes decarboxylation, resulting in Put formation. The amino-propyl group, donated by S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), which is produced by S-adenosylmethionine synthase (SAMS), is then added to Put to generate Spd and Spm sequentially [26,27]. The plant SAMS genes that have been characterized to date have been shown to be strongly upregulated by drought stresses [28,29,30] and function in PAs synthesis [31,32,33]. However, our knowledge of the SAMS genes is still incomplete, as only a small number of SAMS genes have been functionally characterized for their involvement in drought stress tolerance. Additionally, only a few of the upstream regulators of SAMS genes have been identified. The signal-transduction pathway and regulatory network connecting the drought stimulus to polyamine biosynthesis also remain unclear. It is important to note that there is a missing link between MYB expression and the accumulation of PAs, despite their individual correlations with drought responses.
White clover (Trifolium repens), a perennial legume grass commonly utilized for grazing and lawn greening, predominantly has poor drought tolerance [34,35]. As a result, it is a promising candidate for examining drought-response mechanisms and identifying functional genes for the genetic improvement of legumes. In our previous work, we performed RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis to understand the transcriptome dynamics between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive genotypes in T. repens. This analysis revealed several differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with numerous metabolic pathways (not yet published). In this study, we identified a T. repens SAMS gene (TrSAMS1) and assessed its functions in drought tolerance. In addition, we demonstrated that a T. repens MYB33 TF (TrMYB33) acts as a transcriptional factor, binding to TrSAMS1 to regulate spermidine production under drought stress. Furthermore, our findings suggest that TrMYB33 plays a crucial role in coordinating the ABA signal to control drought-induced spermidine accumulation. Considering this evidence together, we propose a regulatory module encompassing ABA-TrMYB33-TrSAMS1-Spd that facilitates drought-induced TrSAMS1 upregulation and spermidine production. These findings shed light on the molecular events linked to spermidine accumulation in plants under drought stress.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Identification and Analysis of TrSAMS1 and Three Genes Involved in Spd Synthesis

In our previous research, exogenous spermidine (Spd) could improve photosynthesis and water-use efficiency and lower oxidative damage [36]. Additionally, spermidine-treated white clover had a higher abundance under drought stress of differentially expressed proteins involved in amino acid and protein biosynthesis, carbon metabolism, and antioxidant and stress defense, as well as in the ABA signaling pathways [36]. To identify the specific genes that were responsible for the increase in spermidine during drought, we analyzed the RNA-Seq dataset. We discovered three DEGs annotated as S-adenosylmethionine synthetase (SAMS, Unigene18063, CL11256, CL6473), one DEG annotated as S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (SAMDC, Unigene9738), and two DEGs annotated as spermidine synthase (SPDS, Unigene7182, Unigene21202), all of which were upregulated under drought stress (Supporting Information: Figure S1). As previously reported, white clover TrSAMDC1 (Accession No. MN400662) was shown to mitigate the negative effects of drought stress by indirectly enhancing Spd content [37]. In this study, we evaluated SAMS and its associated transcription factor. Detailed information on SAMS was documented in our previous results [38]. In this study, we used four SAMS of A. thaliana and the white clover SAMS to construct a phylogenetic tree. It was observed that the gene was most closely related to AtSAMS1 (Supporting Information: Figure S2); therefore, it was named TrSAM1 (T. repens SAMS1). Based on the white clover genome-sequence information (retrieved from NCBI, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/13404 (1 May 2024)), TrSAMSl was located in tandem on chromosome 2P and lacked an intron (Supporting Information: Figure S3). Multiple protein-sequence alignments revealed that TrSAMSl shares high sequence similarity with SAMS proteins of Oryza sativa subsp. japonica, Arabidopsis thaliana, Medicago truncatula, and Glycine max (Supporting Information: Figure S4).

2.2. TrSAMS1 Promotes Spd Synthesis and Positively Contributes to Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis and White Clover

Our previous findings suggested that TrSAMS1 is localized in the nucleus [38]. We quantitatively assessed the relative expression of TrSAMS1 in five A. thaliana overexpression lines (Supporting Information: Figure S5a). We additionally detected the NPT gene (NPT-F and NPT-R listed in s Table S1, 210 bp) in the plasmid backbone (Supporting Information: Figure S5b). Then, two transgenic lines, OE1 and OE3, which had the highest relative expression levels of TrSAMS1, were selected to assess plant drought tolerance.
The phenotypes of the A. thaliana lines under normal conditions (Figure 1a) and under drought stress (Figure 1b) illustrated TrSAMS1’s effectiveness in promoting plant growth and enhancing drought resistance. The transgenic lines exhibited significantly higher levels of both SAM (Figure 1c) and Spd (Figure 1d) than did WT plants before and after exposure to drought, indicating that TrSAMS1 overexpression increases their content. Additionally, there was a significant difference in relative water content (RWC, %) (Figure 1e) between WT plants and OEs before and after drought. However, electrolyte leakage (EL, %) (Figure 1f) and superoxide anion ( O 2 ) (Figure 1g) content significantly decreased in OEs only after drought. Regarding hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), there were significant differences between WT and overexpression plants under both normal growth conditions and drought stress (Figure 1h,i), indicating that TrSAMS1 overexpression had a substantial effect on reducing H2O2 and increasing T-AOC levels in plants. These results suggested that TrSAMS1 overexpression could significantly enhance drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants.
Furthermore, we generated white clover plants overexpressing TrSAMS1 and TrSAMS1-knockdown lines. Green fluorescence was emitted by calli of white clover overexpressing TrSAMS1 on exposure to 488 nm excitation light. (Supporting Information: Figure S6a). These calli were subsequently cultured for root generation (Supporting Information: Figure S6b). Two TrSAMS1-overexpressing white clover lines, OE1 and OE5, which had higher TrSAMS1 expression levels (Supporting Information: Figure S6c) compared to the other lines, were experimentally assessed in this study. In the pTRV-VIGS TrSAMS1-knockdown white clover plants, the TrPDS fragment (Supporting Information: Figure S6d) and the TrSAMS1 fragment (Supporting Information: Figure S6e) obtained through PCR were ligated to linearized pTRV2 vectors. Schematic diagrams of the vector constructs can be found in the supporting information (Supporting Information: Figure S7a). Seedlings inoculated with TrPDS-pTRV2 + pTRV1 exhibited photobleaching, as characterized by numerous white spots on the leaves (Supporting Information: Figure S7b); this phenomenon was not observed in the mock-treatment (Supporting Information: Figure S7c) or water control plants (Supporting Information: Figure S7d). For this study, two TrSAMS1-knockdown white clover lines, M2 and M3, which had the lowest TrSAMS1 expression (Supporting Information: Figure S7e) were experimentally evaluated. TrSAMS1-overexpressing white clover plants were taller and exhibited increased drought resistance, with most leaves retaining their green color after 8 days of drought. The phenotypes of white clover plants before drought are shown in Figure 2a. The TrSAMS1-knockdown white clover plants exhibited weakness, with most leaves turning yellow after 8 days of drought (Figure 2b). Compared to the WT and the knockdown plants, the relative expression of the SAMS gene was significantly higher in OE1 and OE5 plants before and after drought stress (Figure 2c). The relative expression of the SAMS gene in M2 and M3 significantly differed from the WT plants before drought but not after drought stress (Figure 2c).
Additionally, the SAM and Spd contents in OE1 and OE5 plants were significantly higher than those in WT and knockdown plants before and after drought. Moreover, SAM (Figure 2d) and Spd (Figure 2e) in WT plants were significantly higher than in the knockdown plants. Under normal growth conditions, there were no significant differences in RWC (Figure 2f) and EL (Figure 2g) among all plant lines. The RWCs of OE1 and OE5 were 34.79% and 34.21% higher, respectively than that of WT plants during drought, while the RWCs of the knockdown lines M2 and M3 were 11.85% and 12.29% lower than that of WT plants, respectively (Figure 2f). Furthermore, the EL values of OE1 and OE5 were 22.54% and 21.10% lower than that of WT plants during drought, while the EL values of M2 and M3 were 9.75% and 10.66% higher than that of WT plants, respectively (Figure 2g). Finally, significant differences were observed between WT plants and the OE and knockdown plant lines in terms of MDA content under normal growth and drought stress (Figure 2h). Under normal growth conditions, there was no significant difference in O 2 - content among the plant lines. However, under drought conditions, WT plants exhibited substantial differences from the other plant lines (Figure 2i). During normal growth and drought stress, there was a significant difference in H2O2 content and T-AOC between WT plants and the OE and knockdown plant lines (Figure 2j,k). These findings suggest that increased expression of TrSAMS1 is positively associated with plant resistance to drought.

2.3. The TrMYB33 Transcription Factor Regulates TrSAMS1 Transcription

The T. repens cDNA library was probed to identify TFs that bind to the TrSAMS1 promoter region using three baits through Y1Hgold. A total of 53 positive colonies were identified, and select inserts were shown to encode MYB proteins, including TrMYB33. The sequences of all A. thaliana MYBs used for the generation of the phylogenetic tree were downloaded from the PlantTFDB website (http://planttfdb.gao-lab.org/family.php?sp=Ath&fam=MYB (accessed on 1 May 2024)). Phylogenetic analyses revealed that the identified T. repens MYB was most closely related to A. thaliana At5G06100s (Supporting Information: Figure S8a), all three of which corresponded to AtMYB33. Consequently, the protein was annotated as TrMYB33. Additionally, we compared the DNA sequence of TrMYB33 with that of the white clover genome and discovered that its CDS matched sequences in the 3O and 3P chromosomes. (Supporting Information: Figure S8b,c).
Y1Hgold yeast cells co-transformed with the baits (constructed using FL, P1, mP1, P2, P3, and P4) (Figure 3a) and prey could grow on the SD/-Ura/-Leu medium (Figure 3b). Only the yeast carrying baits FL or P1 and TrMYB33 could grow on the SD/-Ura/-Leu/AbA (100 ng/mL) (Figure 3b). Subsequently, the MYB-binding sites in P1 were removed to construct mP1 and Y1Hgold yeast cells carrying mP1 and TrMYB33 did not grow on the medium (Figure 3b).
Then, we transferred the TrMYB33-pGBKT7 recombinant vector to E. coli BL21 (DE3). The total proteins of BL21 were extracted, and an SDS-PAGE analysis was conducted to isolate the TrMYB33 protein. A protein band ranging from 45 kD to 35 kD was identified, which was consistent with the expected properties of TrMYB33 (41.24 kD, with a Myc tag of 1.2 kD.). Subsequently, we performed Super-shift EMSA to determine whether TrMYB33 could directly bind to the MYB binding sites. Incubation of the TrMYB33 protein (carrying a Myc tag) and the labeled probes resulted in a band shift (Figure 3c), indicating the direct and specific binding of TrMYB33 to MYB binding sites within the P1 region of the TrSAMS1 promoter. To further establish TrMYB33’s role in gene activation, we generated firefly LUC reporter constructs driven by the P1 fragment of the TrSAMS1 promoter (Figure 3d), along with an effector. TrMYB33 with the P1 fragment led to over 42-fold activation of LUC in comparison to TrMYB33 carrying the mP1 fragment (Figure 3e). These findings indicated that TrMYB33 serves as a transcriptional activator of TrSAMS1 via interactions with the MYB binding sites on the TrSAMS1 promoter.

2.4. TrMYB33 Is Localized in the Nucleus and Has the Ability to Activate Transcription

To investigate the subcellular localization of TrMYB33, we co-expressed CaMV35S: TrMYB33-EGFP or CaMV35S: EGFP (control vector) in A. thaliana leaves. Microscopic observations revealed that the EGFP signal from the control vector spread throughout the cell. However, the EGFP signal from TrMYB33-EGFP was observed in the nucleus and co-localized with the LSD1 nuclear marker, providing evidence that TrMYB33 is a nuclear-localized protein (Figure 4a). To determine TrMYB33’s transcription-activation capacity, we conducted a transactivation reporter assay with three effectors (Figure 4b). As indicated in the domain analysis on InterPro, the MYB domain encompasses AA18 to AA72 and AA75 to AA123. AH109 yeast cells grew well on the SD/-Trp medium. However, only those transformed with constructs containing the full-length protein sequence and C region and the positive control exhibited normal growth on the selective media and displayed α-galactosidase activity (Figure 4c). These combined results indicate that TrMYB33 possesses a transcription-activating activity, with the activation domain located in the C region.

2.5. TrMYB33 Regulates Spd Accumulation and Contributes to Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis

Since the A. thaliana MYB gene was found to be correlated with drought tolerance and TrMYB33 was identified as an upstream regulator of TrSAMS1, it was hypothesized that TrMYB33 could play a role in drought tolerance by regulating Spd biosynthesis and accumulation. TrMYB33-overexpressing A. thaliana plants (OEs) were generated and confirmed molecularly through the amplification of the NPT fragment (210 bp) using genomic PCR (Figure S9a). Two separate lines that displayed significantly higher TrMYB33 transcript levels, OE2 and OE8, were selected (Figure S9b).
Notably, prior to the drought stress treatment, the OE lines displayed slightly increased growth compared to wild-type plants (Figure 5a). After drought treatment, the plants overexpressing TrMYB33 displayed a more drought-tolerant phenotype compared to the wild type (Figure 5b). We examined whether TrMYB33 overexpression modulated the biosynthesis and accumulation of SAM and Spd in A. thaliana by analyzing the relative expression of the SAMS gene and the SAM and Spd contents. The transgenic lines exhibited higher SAMS gene expression, SAM content, and Spd content compared to wild-type plants before and after drought stress. Drought treatment significantly increased SAMS gene expression and SAM and Spd content in WT plants. However, the OE lines showed an even greater increase, leading to a significant difference between the two groups (Figure 5c–e). Additionally, measurements of the EL (Figure 5f), RWC (Figure 5g), MDA content (Figure 5h), O 2 content (Figure 5i), H2O2 content (Figure 5j), and T-AOC (Figure 5k) indicated that the TrMYB33 overexpression in A. thaliana improved plants’ resistance to drought.

2.6. TrMYB33 Promotes SAMS Expression and Spd Synthesis in Trifolium Repens and Improves Its Drought Tolerance

In a procedure similar to that used for the generation of TrSAMS1-overexpressing and -knockdown T. repens plants, we also generated TrMYB33-overexpressing and -knockdown T. repens lines. For their generation, we continuously cultivated a white clover callus that emitted green fluorescence under excitation light and that eventually produced leaves and roots to obtain the OE transgenic lines. In our subsequent experiments, we utilized two of the resulting TrMYB33-overexpressing white clover lines, OE2 and OE4, which showed the highest TrMYB33 expression levels (Figure S10a). The VIGS construct was generated by recombining the TrMYB33 fragment with a linearized pTRV2 plasmid. M6- and M7-knockdown lines, which had the lowest TrMYB33 expression levels (Figure S10b), were selected for the subsequent experiments. White clover plants overexpressing TrMYB33 were tall and sturdy, with most of their leaves remaining green even after eight days of drought, a characteristic indicative of enhanced drought tolerance. For comparison, the phenotype of white clover plants before drought is shown in Figure 6a. TrMYB33-knockdown white clover plants exhibited greater sensitivity, with most of their leaves turning yellow after eight days of drought (as depicted in Figure 6b). The relative expression of TrMYB33 and TrSAMS1 was significantly higher before and after drought stress in the OE2 and OE4 plants than in the WT and knockdown plants (see Figure 6c,d). However, TrMYB33 and TrSAMS1 relative expression were significantly lower in the M2- and M3-knockdown plants compared to the WT plants before stress but not after drought stress (see Figure 6c,d). Additionally, SAM and Spd contents in OE2 and OE4 plants were significantly higher before and after the drought compared to the WT and knockdown plants.
Additionally, SAM and Spd content in WT plants were significantly higher compared to the knockdown plants (Figure 6e,f). Under normal growth conditions, EL was not significantly different among all plants, but the EL values (Figure 6g) of OE2 and OE4 were remarkably lower than that of WT plants. Furthermore, the RWCs (Figure 6h) of the M6 and M7 lines were higher than that of WT plants during drought, while their RWCs were not significantly different before drought. On the other hand, after drought, OEs had the highest RWC, and knockdown plants had the lowest. H2O2 (Figure 6i) and MDA (Figure 6j) were significantly decreased in OEs and notably increased in knockdown plants before and after drought. The O 2 content did not significantly vary among the plant lines under normal growth conditions. However, significant differences were observed between the WT plants and the OE and knockdown lines under drought conditions (Figure 6k). During normal growth, a significant difference in T-AOC was observed between the WT and overexpression plants, while no significant differences were identified compared with the knockdown lines. However, after drought stress, the difference was significant between the WT plants and the OE and knockdown lines (Figure 6m). Above all, these findings indicate that overexpression of TrMYB33 played a key role in regulating plant drought resistance.
According to the assessment of MYB-DNA interactions, R1R2R3-MYB proteins in plants exhibit distinct DNA-binding specificity [39,40,41]. According to Y1H experiments, 3R-MYBs, NtMYBA1, NtMYBA2, and others bind to “AACGG”, also known as the myb-specific binding element. Each DNA target site for R2R3-MYB in plants has a specific binding sequence. In the initial research on the R2R3-MYB protein in maize, Grotewold et al. [42] discovered its ability to bind ACC(A/T)ACC(A/C/T) through binding-site-selection tests and EMSA. However, the majority of plant R2R3-MYB proteins can also bind to (T/C)AAC(G/T)G(A/C/T)(A/C/T), AGTTAGTTA, and (C/T)ACC(A/T)A (A/C)C sites. It is evident that the “TAACCA” sequence motif found in this study aligns with these sequence sites.
The analysis of AtMYB33 in Arabidopsis thaliana revealed its strong similarity to GAMYB in barley [43]. No phenotype changes were observed in the myb33 mutant, indicating the functional redundancy of MYB33. Additionally, the expression of MYB33: GUS fusion was observed only in newly formed anthers in flowers, not in stem, meristem, or root tips. Furthermore, suppressing MYB33 expression in A. thaliana stem tips resulted in a stunted growth phenotype, indicating the essential role of MYB33 in plant development [44]. Additionally, MYB33 may play a role in regulating root length [45]. Here, we identified TrMYB33 as a transcription factor that regulates the expression of TrSAMS1. We demonstrated that TrMYB33 has a function similar to that of TrSAMS1 during drought, increasing the SAM and Spd content in white clover plants.

2.7. TrSAMS1 and TrMYB33 Are Induced by Drought and ABA in White Clover

To examine the expression patterns of TrSAMS1 and TrMYB33, we analyzed their transcript levels in the leaves of Ladino, a variety of white clover, at designated time points: 0 h, 1.5 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h. Relative expression levels of TrSAMS1 and TrMYB33 were determined using TrActin101 as the internal reference. After drought-stress treatment, it was observed that both TrSAMS1 (Figure 7a) and TrMYB33 (Figure 7c) exhibited a slight increase in relative expression in the leaves at 1.5 h, which was followed by a progressive induction at 12 h and, subsequently, a reduction at 24 h. Such variability suggests a significant change in the expression levels of TrSAMS1 under drought conditions. Treatment of white clover with 100 μM ABA resulted in similar changes in the relative expression of TrSAMS1 (Figure 7b) and TrMYB33 (Figure 7d).

2.8. Drought Induces Spd Accumulation and Exogenous Spd Enhances Drought Tolerance of White Clover

We measured the levels of endogenous Spd in T. repens after treatment with 12% PEG6000. Spd levels significantly increased after 1.5 h and reached their maximum at 12 h of PEG6000 treatment (Figure 8a). Furthermore, exogenous Spd supplementation significantly increased the endogenous Spd content in comparison to the control (Figure 8b). It was observed that the seedlings subjected to a 12% PEG6000 treatment, after a Spd pretreatment, exhibited reduced leaf wilting and increased leaf turgor compared to the control seedlings (Figure 8c). Lower levels of EL (Figure 8d) and RWC (Figure 8e) were observed in plants pretreated with Spd. These findings suggest that drought induces Spd accumulation in T. repens and that exogenously applied Spd mitigates drought-induced damage.
Drought triggers oxidative stress in plants through the substantial generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [46,47,48]. In plants, there are three commonly occurring small, low-molecular-weight polycationic compounds called polyamines: putrescine (Put), spermidine (Spd), and spermine (Spm). Other polyamines are less frequently present [49]. In addition to mediating growth, differentiation, and cell-death processes, polyamines play a critical role in modulating plant responses to abiotic stresses [24,50,51] by scavenging free radicals and balancing osmotic pressure directly [52]. Moreover, Spd has been determined to be more tightly associated with plant stress resistance [53,54,55,56,57].
Transgenic A. thaliana T2-generation plants overexpressing the Spd synthetase gene from Cucurbita ficifolia displayed significantly enhanced Spd synthetase activity. Consequently, the levels of Spd and Spm in transgenic plants were statistically significantly increased compared to those in the wild type. This suggests that the increased activity of Spd synthetases catalyzed the increased synthesis of Spd in T2 lines. Meanwhile, the transgenic A. thaliana plants demonstrated enhanced drought resistance [51].
In previous experiments investigating the influence of exogenous Spd on white clover seed germination under water stress, Spd treatment enhanced the germination rate, activity, index, root activity, and length of the seeds. Additionally, Spd reduced the degree of lipid peroxidation during seed germination while increasing the activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase [52]. In our research, we generated A. thaliana plants overexpressing the TrSAMS1 gene. Subsequently, these plants showed considerable augmentation of SAM and Spd contents in comparison to the wild type under both normal and drought growth conditions. This finding suggests that overexpression of TrSAMS1 leads to an increase in SAM levels in A. thaliana, thereby promoting Spd synthesis. Additionally, overexpression of TrSAMS1 significantly increased the expression of the SAMS gene, SAM content, and Spd content in white clover. Conversely, their levels were significantly reduced in the TrSAMS1-knockdown white clover plants, thereby confirming the inherent presence of the SAMS→SAM→Spd regulatory pathway. Consequently, both TrSAMS1 transgenic A. thaliana and white clover exhibited increased resistance to drought stress by decreasing O 2 , H2O2, and MDA levels, as well as EL.

2.9. ABA Signaling Is Involved in Spd Accumulation in White Clover under Drought Conditions

Before the onset of drought, no discernible phenotypic differences were apparent between the treatment and the control groups (Figure 9a). Following eight days of drought stress, no significant difference in appearance was observed between the ABA treatment group and the control group. However, in the ST treatment group, the leaves of white clover plants manifested the most severe wilting. In contrast, plants in the ST + Spd treatment group showed the highest level of drought resistance (Figure 9b). We analyzed the ABA content of white clover after ABA treatment and found that the maximum ABA content was observed after 12 h of treatment (Figure 9c). We also measured the relative expression levels of TrMYB33 and TrSAMS1 at 12 h among all treatment groups. While the ABA treatment group exhibited significant increases in TrMYB33 and TrSAMS1 expression levels, the ST treatment group exhibited a significant decrease in their expression levels (Figure 9d,e). After eight days of drought treatment, the Spd content in white clover is shown in Figure 9f, while EL and RWC are shown in Figure 9g and Figure 9h, respectively. These findings indicate that the ST treatment led to more severe drought damage in white clover but that supplementation of Spd helped to alleviate this damage.
ABA plays a vital role in a wide range of plant growth and development processes, such as seed dormancy, leaf senescence, regulation of flowering, and fruit ripening, in addition to its involvement in plant responses to drought stress [58,59,60]. By regulating the stomatal aperture and controlling the expression of genes encoding for structural and regulatory proteins, including transcription-factor genes, via signal transduction pathways, ABA can effectively modulate water balance in plants under drought stress conditions. Several plant genes have been reported to be induced by exogenous ABA, as documented by Campbell et al. [61] and Yoshida et al. [62]. In A. thaliana, 245 genes were identified as inducible by ABA, and 299 genes were identified as inducible by drought. Of these, 155 genes were found to be inducible by both ABA and drought, indicating that ABA is involved in regulating most genes in A. thaliana in response to drought stress [63]. When subjecting detached leaves from different drought-tolerant alfalfa cultivars to PEG stress, Ivanova et al. [64] found that the drought-tolerant cultivars could sustain elevated levels of ABA for a prolonged time. In contrast, the drought-sensitive cultivars exhibited only a short-term increase in ABA. During water stress, the VSP protein content increased in alfalfa and white clover [65]. In addition, the VSP content also increased with different ABA-treatment concentrations [66].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Nicotiana benthamiana (cv. k326) seeds were planted in plastic pots (10 cm in length and width, 15 cm in depth), filled with nutrient soil, a mixture of Pindstrup substrate and vermiculite at a ratio of 9:1 (v/v). The seeds of T. repens (cv. Ladino) were firstly planted in plastic boxes (30 cm in length, 25 cm in width, and 10 cm in depth) filled with quartz sand with a particle diameter of 0.3 to 0.5 cm and supplemented with Hoagland’s nutrient solution. Then, 30-day-old uniformly sized white clover plants were transplanted into plastic pots. To analyze the effect of exogenous Spd on drought responses, 30-day-old white clover plants were treated with water (as a control) or 10 mM Spd for 1 d before exposure to 12% PEG6000. To explore the expression patterns of TrSAMS1 and TrMYB33, 30-day-old white clover plants were treated with 12% PEG6000 and 100 μM ABA and sampled at 1.5 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after treatment. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until further analyses. The growth chamber’s culture conditions were 12 h of light at 23 °C and 12 h of darkness at 19 °C, with approximately 220 μmol/ (m2·s) of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR).

3.2. RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted using the HiPure Plant RNA Mini Kit (R4151; Guangzhou Magen Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, first-strand complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (RR047A; Takara, Beijing, China). Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was conducted on a Real-Time PCR system (CFX96, Bio-rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using the NovoStart SYBR qPCR Supermix Plus (Novoprotein, Suzhou, China). Actin2 and Actin101 were used as internal reference genes for A. thaliana and T. repens, respectively [67]. Relative expression levels were calculated with the 2−ΔΔCt formula [68]. Primers are listed in Supporting Information Table S1.

3.3. Isolation and Analysis of TrSAMS1

A transcriptome dataset obtained previously (not published) was analyzed to uncover differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in Spd biosynthesis. Three unigenes (Unigene18063, CL11265, CL6473) annotated as S-adenosylmethionine synthetases (SAMS) were upregulated 1.2-, 1.3-, and 4-fold, respectively. Then, cDNA was amplified through reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The obtained DNA was sequenced, multiple sequence comparisons were performed, and phylogenetic trees were constructed. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that the isolated SAMS was most closely related to AtSAMS1 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Thus, the gene was named TrSAMS1 (Accession No. MH807625).

3.4. Construction and Screening of a cDNA Library

Total RNA was extracted from leaves of T. repens seedlings exposed to drought for one day and then used for constructing a prey cDNA library with the pGADT7 vector through a commercial kit (Matchmaker Gold Yeast One-Hybrid Library Screening System, Cat. no. 630491; Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). Three bait vectors were acquired by inserting a fragment of the TrSAMS1 promoter into the pAbAi vector. Library screening was conducted according to the Yeast Protocols Handbook (PT3024-1; Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). The Y1Hgold yeast cells were cultivated for 4 d at 30 °C on solid synthetic dextrose (SD)/-Ura/-Leu medium containing 2% agar and 100 ng/mL AbA. A single colony was selected and cultivated in liquid SD/-Ura/-Leu medium. Plasmid extraction was performed from yeast cells. This step was followed by amplification using PCR and sequencing of prey fragments on pGADT7 to identify interacting TFs. The identified candidate sequence was analyzed using the TAIR database, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed. Phylogenetic analyses demonstrated that the identified TF was most closely related to AtMYB33 of A. thaliana. Thus, the gene was named TrMYB33.

3.5. Subcellular Localization of the TrMYB33 Protein

The TrMYB33 CDS without the termination codon was amplified and cloned into a frame with an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) driven by the CaMV35S promoter in the pCAMBIA3300-EGFP vector. The EHA105 carrying two distinct recombinant vectors was transiently transfected into Arabidopsis protoplasts [69]. In particular, for TrMYB33, plasmids expressing the nuclear marker 35S: LSD1 [70] were co-transformed. Subcellular localization of the target proteins was observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (FV10i; Olympus, Tokoyo, Japan).

3.6. Plasmid Construction and Plant Transformation

The full-length CDS of TrSAMS1 or TrMYB33 was cloned into pCAMBIA3300-EGFP under the CaMV35S promoter. The recombinant vectors were then transformed into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105, which was used to generate transgenic white clover [71] and A. thaliana [72] plants. Transgenic plants were selected on MS [73] medium containing 50 µg/mL kanamycin. Transgenic A. thaliana plants were selfed until the T3 generation was reached, while white clover plants directly derived from in vitro multiplication and the callus line were used for further analysis.

3.7. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) of TrMYB33 or TrSAMS1 in White Clover

pTRV1 (Genbank Accession No. AF166084.1) and pTRV2 (Genbank Accession No. AF406991) were used for the TRV-VIGS system, as has been reported in detail [74]. The 325 nt gene sequences of TrPDS (Phytoenedesaturase) and a 400 nt fragment of TrMYB33 (Accession No. ON435710) were inserted into the vector pTRV2. The primers for TrPDS were TrPDS-325-F and TrPDS-325-R, and those for TrMYB33 were TrMYB33-400-F and TrMYB33-400-R. The final verified recombinant vectors were then transformed into the GV3101 Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain to conduct the VIGS experiment. To this end, an OD600 of 0.6 of pTRV1/GV3101 and pTRV2/GV3101 was mixed at a volume ratio of 1:1.

3.8. Yeast One-Hybrid (Y1H) Assay

In the present study, a yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). The 1885bp sequence upstream of TrSAMS1 corresponding to its promoter region was cloned. According to the distribution of MYB binding sites in the promoter region of TrSAMS1, four partial promoter fragments designated as P1, P2, P3, and P4 and containing the MYB binding site elements were inserted into the pAbAi vector to construct three baits. In addition, the MYB binding-site sequences (TAACCACTAACCA) in P1 were removed to generate mP1. Meanwhile, the complete CDS of TrMYB33 was fused with the activation domain (AD) of galactose-specific transcription enhancing factor 4 (GAL4) in the pGADT7 vector to generate the prey. Y1Hgold yeast cells carrying the vector were cultured for 5 d at 30 °C on SD/-Ura/-Leu medium with or without 100 ng/mL AbA.

3.9. Dual Luciferase Assay

The full-length CDS of TrMYB33 was inserted into the pGreenII 62-SK vector to generate the effector, and the P1 and P1-M fragments of the TrSAMS1 promoter were inserted into the pGreenII0800-LUC vector to generate reporters. The reporter and effector constructs were co-transformed into A. tumefaciens EHA105 (pSoup) and were used to infiltrate six-week-old N. benthamiana leaves. Transient expression was assessed by determining firefly luciferase (LUC) and Renilla luciferase (REN) luciferase activities through the Duo-Lite Luciferase Assay System (DD1205-01, Vazyme, Nanjing, China) on a microplate reader (Varioskan LUX; Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Four biological replicates were prepared for each sample.

3.10. Super-Shift Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)

The full-length CDS of TrMYB33 was cloned into pGBKT7 to generate a fusion protein with the tag Myc-TrMYB33, which was subsequently expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). After growing in an LB liquid medium for 12 h at 37 °C, the total proteins were extracted by using a Beyolytic Bacterial active protein-extraction reagent (P0013Q, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A 22-bp single-strand DNA fragment containing the wild-type or mutated MYB binding sites was synthesized based on the P1 sequence and labeled using an EMSA probe biotin labeling kit (GS008, Beyotime, Shanghai, China). At the same time, fragments without biotin labeling were used as competitors. Super-shift EMSA was conducted using the Chemiluminescent EMSA Kit (GS009, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) complemented with washing liquid (GS009W, Beyotime, Shanghai, China), test-balancing fluid (GS009A, Beyotime, Shanghai, China), and sealing fluid (GS009B, Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Subsequently, the protein–DNA complexes were separated on 6% native-polyacrylamide gel, electroblotted onto a nylon membrane (FFN10, Beyotime, Shanghai, China), crosslinked under an ultraviolet lamp for 10 min, sealed and washed on the nylon membrane, and then visualized using chemiluminescence on ChemiDoc imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

3.11. Transcriptional Activation Assay for TrMYB33

Based on the location of the MYB binding domain in TrMYB33, the complete CDS of TrMYB33 and two truncated fragments (N-terminal and C-terminal regions) were separately inserted into the pGBKT7 vector (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) to generate constructs and to assess the TrMYB33 transcriptional activation activity. An AH109 yeast strain with an α-galactosidase (MEL1) reporter gene was transformed with the constructs and incubated on SD/-Trp, SD/-Trp/-Ade, and SD/-Trp/-Ade/-His/X-α-gal (20 mg/L). The pGBKT7 vector was used as the negative control, and the pGBKT7-53 + pGADT7-T vector was used as the positive control.

3.12. Drought Tolerance Assays

All posts were filled with soil of identical weight and were watered thoroughly before stress, and stress conditions were identical. For drought tolerance assessment, three-week-old A. thaliana wild-type (WT) and transgenic plants (overexpressing TrSAMS1 or TrMYB33) were treated with 12% PEG6000 for 4 d. Next, four-week-old white clovers were subjected to natural drought by water withholding (WT, TrSAMS1-overexpressing lines, TrMYB33-overexpressing lines, TrSAMS1-VIGS lines, TrMYB33-VIGS lines) for eight days. Leaves were collected at the designated time points for physiological analyses before and after drought treatment. Three replicates were assessed for each line and time point.

3.13. Physiological Measurements

Electrolyte leakage (EL) was determined as described in a previous report [75]. Shortly, ~0.1 g leaves were coated with tissue and placed into 50 mL of centrifugation tubes containing 30 mL deionized water, and the same volume of deionized water was used as the control. The tubes were shaken at a rate of 50 rpm on a thermostatic shaker (THZ-D; Peiying Experimental Equipment Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) for 60 min at 25 °C before the first conductance was determined (S1 for the sample and SC1 for the control) using a conductivity meter (DDSJ-319L, INESA Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The tubes were then heated for 15 min in boiling water and subsequently naturally cooled down to 25 °C before the second conductance reading (S2 and SC2). Relative conductance was used to represent EL and calculated using RS(%) = (S1 − SC1)/(S2 − SC2) × 100.
For determination of relative water content (RWC), about 0.1 g of fresh leaves were sampled, and this value was recorded as the fresh weight (FW). Then, leaves were dipped into distilled water for 24 h at 4 °C to obtain the saturated fresh weight (SW), then dried for 30 min at 105 °C and 48 h at 75 °C. After 3 d, dry weight (DW) was recorded. RWC was obtained using the following calculation: RWC(%) = (FW − DW)/(SW − DW) × 100%.
The O 2 content was determined according to the method of Elstner et al. [76]: 0.1 g of fresh leaves was crushed with 1.5 mL of 65 mM PBS buffer (pH = 7.8), and the slurry was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min. Then, 0.5 mL of the supernatant (the control was 0.5 mL of PBS buffer) was added to 0.5 mL of pH = 7.8 PBS buffer and 0.1 mL of hydroxylamine hydrochloride (10 mM) and incubated in a 25 °C water bath for 20 min. Then, 1 mL of sulfanilamide (58 mM) and 1 mL of α-naphthylamine (7 mM) were added, and the solution was incubated again in a 25 °C water bath for 20 min. Next, 3 mL of chloroform was then added and the samples were mixed thoroughly and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The upper layer of the aqueous phase (pink) was collected to determine its absorbance at 530 nm.
For the determination of H2O2 content [77], 0.1 g of fresh white clover leaves were collected, and after the addition of 1 mL of 0.1% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), they were well ground with a plant-tissue grinder and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min. Next, 0.5 mL of pH = 7.0 PBS buffer (10 mM) and 1 mL of 1 M potassium iodide were added to 0.5 mL of the supernatant (control was 0. 1% TCA), and the samples were shaken well and placed in the dark for 10 min. Subsequently, their absorbance at 390 nm was determined.
Approximately 0.1 g of leaves was placed in a 2 mL centrifugation tube and ground into powder on a high-throughput tissue grinder (SCIENTZ-48, Ningbo Xinzhi Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Ningbo, China). Next, 1 mL of phosphate buffer solution (PBS, 50 mM, pH 7.2) was added, and the solution was mixed by vortexing. The homogenate extract was centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 rpm at 4 °C, and the supernatant was used for malondialdehyde (MDA) measurement using an MDA kit (G0110W; Grace Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China). Total protein contents were measured via the staining method with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 [78]. Absorbance was measured on a spectrophotometer (UV-2700, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) was measured using an assay kit (ml094998, Mlbio, Shanghai, China) according to the instructions.

3.14. Quantification of SAM, Spd and ABA Content

SAMS activity was indirectly represented by the production of SAM. SAM, spermidine, and ABA contents were performed by the method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). About 0.1 g of leaves were homogenized with 1 mL of pre-cooled PBS buffer (50 mM buffer, pH 7.2) and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was used for quantifying through specific detection kits (ml077300 for SAM, ml077200 for spermidine, and ml077235 for ABA, Mlbio, Shanghai, China), according to the instructions of the kits. In brief, 10 µL of each sample and 40 µL dilution buffer were added to the wells of the ELISA plate, incubated, and washed, then a 50 µL enzyme-labeled reagent was added to each well. Subsequently, the plate was incubated and washed again. Then, chromogenic reagents A and B were successively added to the wells, mixed, and incubated in the dark at 37 °C for 10 min. Before readings were taken at 450 nm (OD450) on the microplate reader (SpectraMax190, Frederick, MD, USA), the reaction was stopped by the addition of 50 µL termination buffer provided in the kit.

3.15. Exogenous ABA and Spermidine Backfill Experiment

Wild-type white clover was used as the experimental material. The ABA content of white clover was determined after treatment with 100 μM ABA for 24 h. According to the previous results, white clover treated with 100 μM ABA for 12 h, white clover treated with 100 μM sodium tungstate (ABA synthesis inhibitor, ST) for 12 h, and white clover treated with 100 μM ST + 100 μM Spd for 12 h were selected. The relative expression levels of TrMYB33 and TrSAMS1 were measured. After 8 d of drought treatment, the Spd content, EL, and RWC content of each treatment group were measured.

3.16. Statistical Analysis

All the data were processed through Origin 2021 software and displayed with means ± standard deviation. Statistical differences were determined through ANOVA based on Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) at a significance level of p < 0.05.

4. Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that expression of TrSAMS1 and TrMYB33 were induced by drought stress and ABA. We also propose an informative and comprehensive model for understanding how Spd accumulates under drought stress, as follows: drought exposure upregulates ABA biosynthetic genes, leading to increased endogenous ABA synthesis, and TrMYB33 is induced by ABA. TrMYB33 attaches to the promoter of TrSAMS1, activating its expression, which promotes SAM synthesis resulting from ABA elicitation (see Figure 10). SAM then participates in and facilitates Spd biosynthesis. This model can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanism and transcriptional network that lead to the accumulation of Spd in response to drought. Our research also provides new insights into the role of TrMYB33-orchestrated ABA signaling in regulating Spd synthesis. TrMYB33-TrSAMS1 constitutes a transcriptional module responsible for plant ABA and drought-induced Spd synthesis, as evidenced by our findings.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25136974/s1.

Author Contributions

Y.Z. (Youzhi Zhang) and Y.P. conceived of the project. Y.Z. (Youzhi Zhang) wrote the draft and performed the experiments. X.Q. and Z.H. carried out bioinformatics analysis. Y.Z. (Yan Zhang), Z.L. and G.N. interpreted the experiment results. J.Z., G.F. and Y.P. contributed to the writing and revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by International Cooperation Project of Sichuan Province [NO. 2022YFH0059], Sichuan Forage Innovation Team Program [NO. SCCXTD-2020-16] and Tianfu Outstanding Scientist Program [NO. 1863] This research was also supported by Grant No. 32172508 and No. 31872048 from National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data will be available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Vinocur, B.; Altman, A. Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: Achievements and limitations. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005, 16, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kim, J.M.; Sasaki, T.; Ueda, M.; Sako, K.; Seki, M. Chromatin changes in response to drought, salinity, heat, and cold stresses in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rasheed, S.; Bashir, K.; Matsui, A.; Tanaka, M.; Seki, M. Transcriptomic Analysis of Soil-Grown Arabidopsis thaliana Roots and Shoots in Response to a Drought Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bashir, K.; Rasheed, S.; Matsui, A.; Iida, K.; Tanaka, M.; Seki, M. Monitoring Transcriptomic Changes in Soil-Grown Roots and Shoots of Arabidopsis thaliana Subjected to a Progressive Drought Stress. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1761, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, L.; Yang, H.; Fang, Y.; Guo, W.; Chen, H.; Zhang, X.; Dai, W.; Chen, S.; Hao, Q.; Yuan, S.; et al. Overexpression of GmMYB14 improves high-density yield and drought tolerance of soybean through regulating plant architecture mediated by the brassinosteroid pathway. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 702–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Thirumalaikumar, V.P.; Devkar, V.; Mehterov, N.; Ali, S.; Ozgur, R.; Turkan, I.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Balazadeh, S. NAC transcription factor JUNGBRUNNEN1 enhances drought tolerance in tomato. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 354–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ma, Q.; Xia, Z.; Cai, Z.; Li, L.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, J.; Nian, H. GmWRKY16 Enhances Drought and Salt Tolerance Through an ABA-Mediated Pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, X.; Yu, B.; Wu, Q.; Min, Q.; Zeng, R.; Xie, Z.; Huang, J. OsMADS23 phosphorylated by SAPK9 confers drought and salt tolerance by regulating ABA biosynthesis in rice. PLoS Genet. 2021, 17, e1009699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ju, Y.L.; Yue, X.F.; Min, Z.; Wang, X.H.; Fang, Y.L.; Zhang, J.X. VvNAC17, a novel stress-responsive grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) NAC transcription factor, increases sensitivity to abscisic acid and enhances salinity, freezing, and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 146, 98–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dubos, C.; Stracke, R.; Grotewold, E.; Weisshaar, B.; Martin, C.; Lepiniec, L. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dai, X.; Xu, Y.; Ma, Q.; Xu, W.; Wang, T.; Xue, Y.; Chong, K. Overexpression of an R1R2R3 MYB gene, OsMYB3R-2, increases tolerance to freezing, drought, and salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1739–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cai, H.; Tian, S.; Dong, H.; Guo, C. Pleiotropic effects of TaMYB3R1 on plant development and response to osmotic stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Gene 2015, 558, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Katiyar, A.; Smita, S.; Lenka, S.K.; Rajwanshi, R.; Chinnusamy, V.; Bansal, K.C. Genome-wide classification and expression analysis of MYB transcription factor families in rice and Arabidopsis. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Graceson, A.; Hare, M.; Hall, N.; Monaghan, J. Plant MYB Transcription Factors: Their Role in Drought Response Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 15811–15851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shin, R.; Burch, A.Y.; Huppert, K.A.; Tiwari, S.B.; Murphy, A.S.; Guilfoyle, T.J.; Schachtman, D.P. The Arabidopsis transcription factor MYB77 modulates auxin signal transduction. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2440–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Oh, J.E.; Kwon, Y.; Kim, J.H.; Noh, H.; Hong, S.W.; Lee, H. A dual role for MYB60 in stomatal regulation and root growth of Arabidopsis thaliana under drought stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 77, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Seo, P.J.; Xiang, F.; Qiao, M.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, Y.N.; Kim, S.G.; Lee, Y.H.; Park, W.J.; Park, C.M. The MYB96 transcription factor mediates abscisic acid signaling during drought stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Galbiati, M.; Matus, J.T.; Francia, P.; Rusconi, F.; Cañón, P.; Medina, C.; Conti, L.; Cominelli, E.; Tonelli, C.; Arce-Johnson, P. The grapevine guard cell-related VvMYB60 transcription factor is involved in the regulation of stomatal activity and is differentially expressed in response to ABA and osmotic stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.; Song, J.; Yang, Z. AtMYB20 is negatively involved in plant adaptive response to drought stress. Plant Soil 2014, 376, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liang, Y.K.; Dubos, C.; Dodd, I.C.; Holroyd, G.H.; Hetherington, A.M.; Campbell, M.M. AtMYB61, an R2R3-MYB transcription factor controlling stomatal aperture in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 1201–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pandey, P.; Ramegowda, V.; Senthil-Kumar, M. Shared and unique responses of plants to multiple individual stresses and stress combinations: Physiological and molecular mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tiburcio, A.F.; Altabella, T.; Bitrián, M.; Alcázar, R. The roles of polyamines during the lifespan of plants: From development to stress. Planta 2014, 240, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Seo, S.Y.; Kim, Y.J.; Park, K.Y. Increasing polyamine contents enhanced the stress tolerance via reinforcement of antioxidative properties. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Groppa, M.D.; Benavides, M.P. Polyamines and abiotic stress: Recent advances. Amino Acids 2008, 34, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Alcázar, R.; Altabella, T.; Marco, F.; Bortolotti, C.; Reymond, M.; Koncz, C.; Carrasco, P.; Tiburcio, A.F. Polyamines: Molecules with regulatory functions in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Planta 2010, 231, 1237–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tiburcio, A.F.; Campos, J.L.; Figueras Besford, R.T. Recent advances in the understanding of polyamine functions during plant development. Plant Growth Regul. 1993, 12, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lutts, S.; Hausman, J.F.; Quinet, M.; Lefèvre, I. Polyamines and their roles in the alleviation of ion toxicities in plants. In Ecophysiology and Responses of Plants under Salt Stress; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 315–353. [Google Scholar]
  28. Oh, M.W.; Komatsu, S. Characterization of proteins in soybean roots under flooding and drought stresses. J. Proteomics 2015, 114, 161–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wang, X.; Oh, M.W.; Komatsu, S. Characterization of S-adenosylmethionine synthetases in soybean under flooding and drought stresses. Biol. Plant. 2016, 60, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, F.; Ma, J.; Wang, P.; Yang, Y. Genome-Wide Identification of the SAMS Gene Family in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and Expression Analysis in Drought Stress Treatments. Genes 2022, 13, 860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Guo, Z.; Tan, J.; Zhuo, C.; Wang, C.; Xiang, B.; Wang, Z. Abscisic acid, H2O2 and nitric oxide interactions mediated cold-induced S-adenosylmethionine synthetase in Medicago sativa subsp. falcata that confers cold tolerance through up-regulating polyamine oxidation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12, 601–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhu, H.; He, M.; Jahan, M.S.; Wu, J.; Gu, Q.; Shu, S.; Sun, J.; Guo, S. CsCDPK6, a CsSAMS1-Interacting Protein, Affects Polyamine/Ethylene Biosynthesis in Cucumber and Enhances Salt Tolerance by Overexpression in Tobacco. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhuo, C.; Liang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, Z.; Lu, S.A. Cold responsive ethylene responsive factor from Medicago falcata confers cold tolerance by up-regulation of polyamine turnover, antioxidant protection, and proline accumulation. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 2021–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Annicchiarico, P.; Piano, E. Indirect selection for root development of white clover and implications for drought tolerance. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2004, 190, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mercer, C.F.; Watson, R.N. Effects of nematicides and plant resistance on white clover performance and seasonal populations of nematodes parasitizing white clover in grazed pasture. J. Nematol. 2007, 39, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Peng, Y.; Ma, X.; Huang, L.; Yan, Y. Physiological and iTRAQ-Based Proteomic Analyses Reveal the Function of Spermidine on Improving Drought Tolerance in White Clover. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 15, 1563–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jia, T.; Hou, J.; Iqbal, M.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, B.; Feng, H.; Li, Z.; Liu, L.; Zhou, J.; Feng, G.; et al. Overexpression of the white clover TrSAMDC1 gene enhanced salt and drought resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 165, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, Z.; Hou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, W.; Cheng, B.; Hassan, M.J.; Zhang, Y.; Pu, Q.; Peng, Y. Spermine Regulates Water Balance Associated with Ca2+-Dependent Aquaporin (TrTIP2-1, TrTIP2-2 and TrPIP2-7) Expression in Plants under Water Stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020, 61, 1576–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Howe, K.M.; Watson, R.J. Nucleotide preferences in sequence-specific recognition of DNA by c-myb protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19, 3913–3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Weston, K. Extension of the DNA binding consensus of the chicken c-Myb and v-Myb proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 3042–3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ito, M. Conservation and diversification of three–repeat Myb transcription factors in plants. J. Plant Res. 2005, 118, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Grotewold, E.; Drummond, B.J.; Bowen, B. The myb-homologous P gene controls phlobaphene pigmentation in maize floral organs by directly activating a flavonoid biosynthetic gene subset. Cell 1994, 76, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Stracke, R.; Werber, M.; Weisshaar, B. The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Millar, A.A.; Gubler, F. The Arabidopsis GAMYB-like genes, MYB33 and MYB65, are microRNA-regulated genes that redundantly facilitate anther development. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 705–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xue, T.; Liu, Z.; Dai, X.; Xiang, F. Primary root growth in Arabidopsis thaliana is inhibited by the miR159 mediated repression of MYB33, MYB65 and MYB101. Plant Sci. 2017, 262, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Farooq, M.; Wahid, A.; Lee, D.J. Exogenously Applied Polyamines Increase Drought Tolerance of Rice by Improving Leaf Water Status, Photosynthesis and Membrane Properties. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2009, 31, 937–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ghassemi, S.; Farhangi-Abriz, S.; Faegi-Analou, R.; Ghorbanpour, M.; Lajayer, B.A. Monitoring Cell Energy, Physiological Functions and Grain Yield in Field-Grown Mung Bean Exposed to Exogenously Applied Polyamines under Drought Stress. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2018, 18, 1108–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sharma, A.; Kumar, V.; Shahzad, B.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Singh Sidhu, G.P.; Bali, A.S.; Zheng, B. Photosynthetic response of plants under different abiotic stresses: A review. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 39, 509–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Galston, A.W.; Sawhney, R.K. Polyamines in plant physiology. Plant Physiol. 1990, 94, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Pál, M.; Szalai, G.; Gondor, O.K.; Janda, T. Unfinished Story of Polyamines: Role of Conjugation, Transport and Light-Related Regulation in The Polyamine Metabolism in Plants. Plant Sci. 2021, 308, 110923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Alcázar, R.; Bueno, M.; Tiburcio, A.F. Polyamines: Small Amines with Large Effects on Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Cells 2020, 9, 2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, Z.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, X.Q.; Ma, X.; Huang, L.K.; Yan, Y.H. Exogenous Spermidine Improves Seed Germination of White Clover under Water Stress via Involvement in Starch Metabolism, Antioxidant Defenses and Relevant Gene Expression. Molecules 2014, 19, 18003–18024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bouchereau, A.; Aziz; Larher, F.; Martin-Tanguy, J. Polyamines and environmental challenges: Recent development. Plant Sci. 1999, 140, 103–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, Z.Y.; Chen, S.Y. Differential accumulation of the S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase transcript in rice seedlings in response to salt and drought stress. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 100, 782–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shen, W.; Nada, K.; Tachibana, S. Involvement of polyamines in the chilling tolerance of cucumber cultivars. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. He, L.; Nada, K.; Kasukabe, Y.; Tachibana, S. Enhanced susceptibility of photosynthesis to low-temperature photoinhibition due to interruption of chill-induced increase of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase activity in leaves of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kasukabe, Y.; He, L.; Nada, K.; Misawa, S.; Ihara, I.; Tachibana, S. Overexpression of spermidine synthase enhances tolerance to multiple environmental stresses and up-regulates the expression of various stress-regulated genes in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 712–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Audran, C.; Liotenberg, S.; Gonneau, M.; North, H.; Marion-Poll, A. Localization and expression of zeaxanthin epoxidase mRNA in Arabidopsis in response to drought stress and during seed development. Funct. Plant Biol. 2001, 28, 1161–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Koiwai, H.; Nakaminami, K.; Seo, M.; Mitsuhashi, W.; Toyomasu, T.; Koshiba, T. Tissue-Specific Localization of an Abscisic Acid Biosynthetic Enzyme, AAO3, in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1697–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Iuchi, S.; Kobayashi, M.; Taji, T.; Naramoto, M.; Seki, M.; Kato, T.; Tabata, S.; Kakubari, Y.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Regulation of drought tolerance by gene manipulation of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, a key enzyme in abscisic acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010, 27, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Campbell, J.L.; Klueva, N.Y.; Zheng, H.G.; Nieto-Sotelo, J.; Nguyen, H.T. Cloning of new members of heat shock protein HSP101 gene family in wheat (Triticum aestivum (L.) Moench) inducible by heat, dehydration, and ABA. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Struct. Expr. 2001, 1517, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yoshida, Y. Correlation between the induction of a gene for delta 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase and the accumulation of proline in Arabidopsis thaliana under osmotic stress. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010, 7, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Seki, M.; Ishida, J.; Narusaka, M.; Fujita, M.; Nanjo, T.; Umezawa, T.; Kamiya, A.; Nakajima, M.; Enju, A.; Sakurai, T.; et al. Monitoring the expression pattern of around 7,000 Arabidopsis genes under ABA treatments using a full-length cDNA microarray. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2002, 2, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ivanova, A.; Djilianov, D.; Onckelen, H.V.; Atanassov, A. Abscisic acid changes in osmotic stressed leaves of alfalfa genotypes varying in drought tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 1997, 150, 224–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Erice, G.; Irigoyen, J.J.; Pérez, P.; Martínez-Carrasco, R.; Sánchez-Díaz, M. Effect of elevated CO2, temperature and drought on photosynthesis of nodulated alfalfa during a cutting regrowth cycle. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 126, 458–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Avice, J.C.; Dily, F.; Goulas, E. Vegetative storage proteins in overwintering storage organs of forage legumes: Roles and regulation. Can. J. Bot. 2003, 81, 1198–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pu, Q.; Li, Z.; Nie, G.; Zhou, J.; Liu, L.; Peng, Y. Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for Quantitative Real-Time PCR in White Clover (Trifolium repens L.) Involved in Five Abiotic Stresses. Plants 2020, 9, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Yoo, S.D.; Cho, Y.H.; Sheen, J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: A versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 1565–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. He, S.; Huang, K.; Zhang, X.; Yu, X.; Huang, P.; An, C. The LSD1-Type Zinc Finger Motifs of Pisum sativa LSD1 Are a Novel Nuclear Localization Signal and Interact with Importin Alpha. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Rojo, F.P.; Seth, S.; Erskine, W.; Kaur, P. An Improved Protocol for Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation in Subterranean Clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, Y.; Schiff, M.; Marathe, R.; Dinesh-Kumar, S.P. Tobacco Rar1, EDS1 and NPR1/NIM1 like genes are required for N-mediated resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. Plant J. 2002, 30, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dahro, B.; Wang, F.; Peng, T.; Liu, J.H. PtrA/NINV, an alkaline/neutral invertase gene of Poncirus trifoliata, confers enhanced tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses by modulating ROS levels and maintaining photosynthetic efficiency. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 29, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Elstner, E.F.; Heupel, A. Inhibition of nitrite formation from hydroxyl ammoniumchloride: A simple assay for superoxide dismutase. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 70, 616–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Velikova, V.; Yordanov, I.; Edreva, A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants. Plant Sci. 2000, 151, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Overexpression of TrSAMS1 confers enhanced drought tolerance in A. thaliana. (a,b) Phenotypes of transgenic and WT plants before (a) and after drought treatment (b). (c) SAM content of two transgenic lines (OE1 and OE3) and WT plants, measured before and after the drought treatment. (d) Spd content of two transgenic lines (OE1 and OE3) and WT plants, measured before and after the drought treatment. (e,f) RWC (%) (e) and EL (%) (f) of two transgenic lines and WT PLANTS, measured before and after the drought treatment. (g) O 2 content. (h) H2O2 content. (i) T-AOC. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Overexpression of TrSAMS1 confers enhanced drought tolerance in A. thaliana. (a,b) Phenotypes of transgenic and WT plants before (a) and after drought treatment (b). (c) SAM content of two transgenic lines (OE1 and OE3) and WT plants, measured before and after the drought treatment. (d) Spd content of two transgenic lines (OE1 and OE3) and WT plants, measured before and after the drought treatment. (e,f) RWC (%) (e) and EL (%) (f) of two transgenic lines and WT PLANTS, measured before and after the drought treatment. (g) O 2 content. (h) H2O2 content. (i) T-AOC. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Ijms 25 06974 g001
Figure 2. Overexpression of TrSAMS1 confers enhanced drought tolerance in T. repens. (a) Phenotype of white clover before drought stress. (b) Phenotype of white clover after drought stress. (c) TrSAMS1 relative expression. (d) SAM content. (e) Spd content. (f) RWC (%). (g) EL (%). (h) MDA content. (i) O 2 content. (j) H2O2 content. (k) T-AOC. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Overexpression of TrSAMS1 confers enhanced drought tolerance in T. repens. (a) Phenotype of white clover before drought stress. (b) Phenotype of white clover after drought stress. (c) TrSAMS1 relative expression. (d) SAM content. (e) Spd content. (f) RWC (%). (g) EL (%). (h) MDA content. (i) O 2 content. (j) H2O2 content. (k) T-AOC. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Ijms 25 06974 g002
Figure 3. TrMYB33 binds to and activates the promoter of TrSAMS1. (a) Schematic diagrams of the TrSAMS1 promoter, 1362 bp upstream of the translational start site (TSS, +1), and bait and prey constructs used for the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) one-hybrid assay. MYB binding sites are denoted using orange circles and numbered in the light of their distance from the TSS, which is shown at position + 1. FL, full length fragment. P1, P2, P3 and P4 are four fragments containing a MYB binding-site core sequence in each, while mP1 is mutated form of P1. (b) Growth of yeast cells transformed with different combinations of bait and prey on selective medium. (c) EMSA assays showing direct and specific binding of TrMYB33 to the MYB binding-site element in the TrSAMS1 promoter. The bound-protein–DNA complex and the free probe are shown by the closed and open arrows, respectively. − and +, absence (−) or presence (+) of corresponding component shown above. (d) Schematic diagrams of effector and reporter constructs, driven by CaMV35S promoter, used for dual-LUC transient-expression assay. MCS, multiple cloning sites. P35S, the CaMV35S promoter. T35S, the CaMV35S terminator. LUC, firefly luciferase. REN, Renilla luciferase. (e) Dual-LUC expression assays in tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) cells using vectors in (d). Error bars represent ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate that the values are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. TrMYB33 binds to and activates the promoter of TrSAMS1. (a) Schematic diagrams of the TrSAMS1 promoter, 1362 bp upstream of the translational start site (TSS, +1), and bait and prey constructs used for the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) one-hybrid assay. MYB binding sites are denoted using orange circles and numbered in the light of their distance from the TSS, which is shown at position + 1. FL, full length fragment. P1, P2, P3 and P4 are four fragments containing a MYB binding-site core sequence in each, while mP1 is mutated form of P1. (b) Growth of yeast cells transformed with different combinations of bait and prey on selective medium. (c) EMSA assays showing direct and specific binding of TrMYB33 to the MYB binding-site element in the TrSAMS1 promoter. The bound-protein–DNA complex and the free probe are shown by the closed and open arrows, respectively. − and +, absence (−) or presence (+) of corresponding component shown above. (d) Schematic diagrams of effector and reporter constructs, driven by CaMV35S promoter, used for dual-LUC transient-expression assay. MCS, multiple cloning sites. P35S, the CaMV35S promoter. T35S, the CaMV35S terminator. LUC, firefly luciferase. REN, Renilla luciferase. (e) Dual-LUC expression assays in tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) cells using vectors in (d). Error bars represent ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate that the values are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Ijms 25 06974 g003
Figure 4. Subcellular-localization and transcriptional-activity assays of TrMYB33. (a) Subcellular localization of TrMYB33 based on visualization of EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) signal. The fusion construct (Ca35S: TrMYB33-EGFP) or empty vector (35S:EGFP) was co-transformed with a nuclear marker gene, Ghd7-RFP, into A. thaliana leaves. Confocal microscopic images of epidermal cells were taken under green (for EGFP), red (LSD1-RFP) fluorescence, and bright-field illumination. The images on the right overlap those on the left. Bars, 10 μm. (b) Schematic diagrams of construct vectors used for transcriptional-activity assays. Full-length sequences and truncated fragments of TrMYB33 were introduced downstream of the GAL4BD (galactose-specific transcription enhancing factor 4 binding domain) in the pGBKT7 vector. TrMYB33ΔC and TrMYB33ΔN indicate removal of the C and N termini, respectively. The numbers above the CDS represent the position of the nucleotide residue. (c) Growth of AH109 yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells transformed with the vectors, accompanied by a positive control (pGBKT7-53 + pGADT7-T) and negative control (pGBKT7), on SD/-Trp, SD/-Trp/-Ade, and SD/-Trp/-Ade/-His /X-α-gal.
Figure 4. Subcellular-localization and transcriptional-activity assays of TrMYB33. (a) Subcellular localization of TrMYB33 based on visualization of EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) signal. The fusion construct (Ca35S: TrMYB33-EGFP) or empty vector (35S:EGFP) was co-transformed with a nuclear marker gene, Ghd7-RFP, into A. thaliana leaves. Confocal microscopic images of epidermal cells were taken under green (for EGFP), red (LSD1-RFP) fluorescence, and bright-field illumination. The images on the right overlap those on the left. Bars, 10 μm. (b) Schematic diagrams of construct vectors used for transcriptional-activity assays. Full-length sequences and truncated fragments of TrMYB33 were introduced downstream of the GAL4BD (galactose-specific transcription enhancing factor 4 binding domain) in the pGBKT7 vector. TrMYB33ΔC and TrMYB33ΔN indicate removal of the C and N termini, respectively. The numbers above the CDS represent the position of the nucleotide residue. (c) Growth of AH109 yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells transformed with the vectors, accompanied by a positive control (pGBKT7-53 + pGADT7-T) and negative control (pGBKT7), on SD/-Trp, SD/-Trp/-Ade, and SD/-Trp/-Ade/-His /X-α-gal.
Ijms 25 06974 g004
Figure 5. TrMYB33 overexpression increases SAM and Spd production and confers enhanced drought tolerance in A. thaliana. (a,b) Phenotype of WT plants, OE2, and OE8 before (a) and after stress ((b), rewatering). (c) SAMS relative expression. (d) SAM content. (e) Spd content. (f) EL (%) of the WT and transgenic lines. (g) RWC (%). (h) MDA content. (i) O 2 content. (j) H2O2 content. (k) T-AOC. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. TrMYB33 overexpression increases SAM and Spd production and confers enhanced drought tolerance in A. thaliana. (a,b) Phenotype of WT plants, OE2, and OE8 before (a) and after stress ((b), rewatering). (c) SAMS relative expression. (d) SAM content. (e) Spd content. (f) EL (%) of the WT and transgenic lines. (g) RWC (%). (h) MDA content. (i) O 2 content. (j) H2O2 content. (k) T-AOC. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Ijms 25 06974 g005
Figure 6. Overexpression of TrMYB33 confers enhanced drought tolerance in transgenic Trifolium repnes. (a) Phenotype of white clover before drought stress. (b) Phenotype of white clover after drought stress. (c,d) Relative expression of TrMYB33 (c) and TrSAMS1 (d). (e,f) Content of SAM (e) and Spd (f). (g) EL (%). (h) RWC (%). (i) H2O2 content. (j) MDA content. (k) O 2 content. (m) T-AOC. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Overexpression of TrMYB33 confers enhanced drought tolerance in transgenic Trifolium repnes. (a) Phenotype of white clover before drought stress. (b) Phenotype of white clover after drought stress. (c,d) Relative expression of TrMYB33 (c) and TrSAMS1 (d). (e,f) Content of SAM (e) and Spd (f). (g) EL (%). (h) RWC (%). (i) H2O2 content. (j) MDA content. (k) O 2 content. (m) T-AOC. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Ijms 25 06974 g006
Figure 7. TrSAMS1 and TrMYB33 of Trifolium repens are drought-responsive genes. TrSAMS1 and TrMYB33 expression patterns in Ladino (T. repens) exposed to 12% PEG6000 treatment (a,c) and 100 μM ABA (b,d) for the designated time, as analyzed by qPCR. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. TrSAMS1 and TrMYB33 of Trifolium repens are drought-responsive genes. TrSAMS1 and TrMYB33 expression patterns in Ladino (T. repens) exposed to 12% PEG6000 treatment (a,c) and 100 μM ABA (b,d) for the designated time, as analyzed by qPCR. Error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Ijms 25 06974 g007
Figure 8. Drought induced Spd accumulation and exogenous Spd enhanced drought tolerance of white clover. (a) Endogenous spermidine content in white clover shoots at designated time points of drought treatment. (b) Spermidine level and (c) phenotype of water or spermidine (10 mM)-pretreated (1 d) 30-day-old seedlings before and after 12% PEG6000 treatment (1 d). Bars, 1 cm. (d) EL (%) and (e) RWC (%) of water- or spermidine-treated (2 d) plants, measured after 12% PEG6000 treatment (1 d). Different letters indicated significant differences in value at p < 0.05. Error bars represent SD (n = 3).
Figure 8. Drought induced Spd accumulation and exogenous Spd enhanced drought tolerance of white clover. (a) Endogenous spermidine content in white clover shoots at designated time points of drought treatment. (b) Spermidine level and (c) phenotype of water or spermidine (10 mM)-pretreated (1 d) 30-day-old seedlings before and after 12% PEG6000 treatment (1 d). Bars, 1 cm. (d) EL (%) and (e) RWC (%) of water- or spermidine-treated (2 d) plants, measured after 12% PEG6000 treatment (1 d). Different letters indicated significant differences in value at p < 0.05. Error bars represent SD (n = 3).
Ijms 25 06974 g008
Figure 9. Determination of phenotypic and physiological indexes of white clover in Spd backfill experiment. Phenotype of white clover before drought (a) and after drought (b). (c) ABA content. (d) TrMYB33 relative expression and (e) TrSAMS1 relative expression. (f) Spd content. (g) EL (%). (h) RWC (%). Different letters indicated significant differences in value at p < 0.05.
Figure 9. Determination of phenotypic and physiological indexes of white clover in Spd backfill experiment. Phenotype of white clover before drought (a) and after drought (b). (c) ABA content. (d) TrMYB33 relative expression and (e) TrSAMS1 relative expression. (f) Spd content. (g) EL (%). (h) RWC (%). Different letters indicated significant differences in value at p < 0.05.
Ijms 25 06974 g009
Figure 10. A proposed working model for illustrating the regulatory role of abscisic acid (ABA)-responsive TrMYB33-TrSAMS1 module in spermidine (Spd) accumulation under drought stress. Drought increases endogenous ABA, which subsequently starts the ABA signaling-transduction pathway by promoting the release and activation of TrMYB33. As a result, TrMYB33 consecutively positively regulates the expression of TrSAMS1 by directly and specifically binding to the MYB binding sites and activating the promoter, bringing about upregulation of TrSAMS1, which is then joined into the metabolic pathway to promote Spd production. The “TAACCA” MYB binding site is shown in blue circle; mRNA of TrSAMS1 is shown as a green line; while the TrSAMS1 proteins are shown using the blue curved lines.
Figure 10. A proposed working model for illustrating the regulatory role of abscisic acid (ABA)-responsive TrMYB33-TrSAMS1 module in spermidine (Spd) accumulation under drought stress. Drought increases endogenous ABA, which subsequently starts the ABA signaling-transduction pathway by promoting the release and activation of TrMYB33. As a result, TrMYB33 consecutively positively regulates the expression of TrSAMS1 by directly and specifically binding to the MYB binding sites and activating the promoter, bringing about upregulation of TrSAMS1, which is then joined into the metabolic pathway to promote Spd production. The “TAACCA” MYB binding site is shown in blue circle; mRNA of TrSAMS1 is shown as a green line; while the TrSAMS1 proteins are shown using the blue curved lines.
Ijms 25 06974 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Qin, X.; He, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Nie, G.; Zhao, J.; Feng, G.; Peng, Y. The White Clover TrMYB33-TrSAMS1 Module Contributes to Drought Tolerance by Modulation of Spermidine Biosynthesis via an ABA-Dependent Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136974

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Qin X, He Z, Zhang Y, Li Z, Nie G, Zhao J, Feng G, Peng Y. The White Clover TrMYB33-TrSAMS1 Module Contributes to Drought Tolerance by Modulation of Spermidine Biosynthesis via an ABA-Dependent Pathway. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(13):6974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136974

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Youzhi, Xiaofang Qin, Zhirui He, Yan Zhang, Zhou Li, Gang Nie, Junming Zhao, Guangyan Feng, and Yan Peng. 2024. "The White Clover TrMYB33-TrSAMS1 Module Contributes to Drought Tolerance by Modulation of Spermidine Biosynthesis via an ABA-Dependent Pathway" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 13: 6974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136974

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop