Next Article in Journal
Effect of Dietary Crude Protein and Apparent Metabolizable Energy Levels on Growth Performance, Nitrogen Utilization, Serum Parameter, Protein Synthesis, and Amino Acid Metabolism of 1- to 10-Day-Old Male Broilers
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Phosphatidylcholine by MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry in Normal and IVF Early-Stage Embryos
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modulation of Bronchial Epithelial Barrier Integrity by Low Molecular Weight Components from Birch Pollen
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 13
10.3390/ijms25137429
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Virus-like Particles as Vaccines for Allergen-Specific Therapy: An Overview of Current Developments

by
Helena Berreiros-Hortala
1,2,†,
Gonzalo Vilchez-Pinto
1,2,†,
Araceli Diaz-Perales
1,2,
Maria Garrido-Arandia
1,2 and
Jaime Tome-Amat
1,2,*
1
Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA/CSIC), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223 Madrid, Spain
2
Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, UPM, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(13), 7429; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137429 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 27 May 2024 / Revised: 2 July 2024 / Accepted: 4 July 2024 / Published: 6 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Deciphering Allergies—Structural and Immunological Characterization of Allergenic Proteins and Immunomodulatory Agents)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Immune engineering and modulation are the basis of a novel but powerful tool to treat immune diseases using virus-like particles (VLPs). VLPs are formed by the viral capsid without genetic material making them non-infective. However, they offer a wide variety of possibilities as antigen-presenting platforms, resulting in high immunogenicity and high efficacy in immune modulation, with low allergenicity. Both animal and plant viruses are being studied for use in the treatment of food allergies. These formulations are combined with adjuvants, T-stimulatory epitopes, TLR ligands, and other immune modulators to modulate or enhance the immune response toward the presented allergen. Here, the authors present an overview of VLP production systems, their immune modulation capabilities, and the applicability of actual VLP-based formulations targeting allergic diseases.

1. Introduction

Allergy is a worldspread disease characterized by an exacerbated immune response to a normally tolerated molecule. The prevalence of allergies has increased in the last years, affecting approximately 5% of the global population, with higher concern when considering infants [1,2]. In this context, the allergens responsible for eliciting allergic reactions in susceptible individuals are predominantly food molecules, consisting mainly of proteins and/or lipoproteins [3,4,5]. Although medical treatments for food allergies have made considerable progress [1,6], healthcare professionals universally recommend allergen avoidance as a primary measure [7].
In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on taking advantage of nanotechnology for allergen detection, diagnosis, and treatment using allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) [8,9]. AIT involves gradually administering small amounts of the allergen to the patient, with the goal of training the immune system to tolerate its presence. While AIT remains the only treatment capable of eradicating certain allergic phenotypes, its application in food-allergic patients entails significant challenges, such as the need to achieve better benefit-to-risk ratios before widespread adoption in routine clinical practice [10,11,12].
Hence, novel approaches have been proposed to enhance the effectiveness, safety, and convenience of allergy therapy, such us (a) exploring new administration routes; (b) utilizing allergens, hypoallergens, allergoids, and peptide-based vaccines produced via recombinant methods; and introducing new adjuvants derived from bacteria and viruses, such as (c) bacterial extracts and (d) TLR ligands and, (e) advancements in formulations and delivery systems, such as virus-like particles (VLPs), DNA vaccines, aggregates, nanoparticles, or liposomes [1,13].
In the field of nanobiotechnology, virus-like particles have arisen as a powerful tool for a variety of applications [14,15,16]. VLPs consist of the virus capsid protein but without the corresponding encapsidated nucleic acid [17]. They serve as efficient delivery platforms, capable of transporting a wide variety of cargos due to their controlled self-assembly and adaptable architectures [16,18,19,20]. The nature of VLPs makes them generally highly biocompatible and biodegradable, which is a great advantage compared to other nanoparticles with intended use in therapy [21].
Cargos of interest can be attached to VLPs via genetic engineering or chemical fusion [22], enhancing concentration and efficacy while minimizing the need for potentially harmful adjuvants and the presence of the side effects [23,24]. The presence of these nanostructures with highly repeated domains is known to effectively activate the immune system, akin to vaccines, stimulating both B-cell and dendritic cell responses [25,26]. Regarding toxicity, VLPs are generally considered safe, but careful evaluation is needed [21]. The use of VLPs as a vaccine as promising therapeutic tools is already in trial for diseases such as Alzheimer’s [27,28], arthritis [29], atherosclerosis [30,31], cancer [32,33,34], and, since their early days, for infectious diseases such as malaria, COVID, or papillomavirus [35].
This manuscript aims to review and update the use of these powerful tools in the treatment of allergic diseases. To this end, the review presents a brief overview of what VLPs are, including their structure and function, the systems used to produce them, and the current state of the art in VLPs and allergy research (Figure 1).

2. VLPs as Vaccine: Success Stories

2.1. Structural Features

As mentioned above, VLPs are viral capsids without genetic material, preventing their replication and, therefore, infection capacity. These structures are formed by viral capsid proteins or other self-assembly proteins [17,36,37]. VLPs can be both spherical and filamentous structures. Based on the structure of the coated protein, both types of VLPs can be classified as enveloped (eVLP), non-enveloped or naked (non-eVLP), and chimeric (cVLP) [38] (Figure 2).
eVLPs are complex particles that require the host membrane for envelopment. Thus, in addition to a protein capsid, they will be coated with a lipid bilayer. In some cases, the correct assembly of the eVLP involves specific glycoproteins [24,39]. eVLPs are stable and flexible structures, making them ideal for transporting components; they can be attached to the outermost layer or carried inside. However, the production of these particles is highly complex and will depend on the production system [40].
Non-eVLPs are membraneless particles that arise from the self-assembly of one or more proteins. While there are simple particles composed only of the main nucleocapsid protein, there are complex multiprotein particles that, in addition to the capsid protein, have auxiliary proteins associated with them [24,41]. In general, these particles have higher stability than eVLPs, as they are less susceptible to environmental changes such as temperature, shear strength, and chemical treatments [40].
Finally, cVLPs result from the assembly of viral components from at least two different viral serotypes, or are the product of recombinant DNA [38]. Spherical cVLPs are becoming highly relevant for the encapsulation and display of molecules. Filamentous cVLPs are also being used due to their high functionalization power, as they are structures composed of thousands of subunits (as opposed to spherical ones, composed of hundreds of subunits) [42]. This approach shows great advantages, as the particle surface is highly modifiable by chemical or genetic approaches [43].
To conjugate an epitope by chemical techniques, a linker that binds at one end to the lysines of the viral capsid is used. The other free end of the linker will bind to the epitope of interest, forming the VLP–epitope complex [44]. However, the highest yielding approach consists of gene fusion methods. For this, the VLP is expressed with the sequence of the desired epitope incorporated into the sequence of the viral proteins themselves [17].
The major disadvantage of both conjugation methods is related to the addition of an exogenous component. Due to this, the particle may cause misfolding of viral proteins or decrease their ability to self-assemble [45]. On one hand, chemical conjugation facilitates an easy broad spectrum of diverse formulas, based on the production of a single common batch with controlled conditions [46]. Therefore, the same platform can be used for many objectives. This is a very interesting point when facing a large scale of production and the possibilities of treating different diseases. Moreover, chemical conjugation will better preserve the stability and architecture of VLP compared to genetic coupling [47]. On the other hand, genetic conjugation offers a controlled molecular ratio of the VLP–epitope complex, the possibility of disassembling/reassembling the formula, and more safety in terms of the presence of free antigen. In addition, this methodology dispenses with pH-dependent chemical reactions and the use of toxic reagents [48].

2.2. Challenges in the Production of VLPs

VLPs can be obtained from the parental virus by removing the genetic material, although this approximation may show several safety issues. The majority of VLPs produced are based on heterologous systems by recombinant production of the capsid protein with or without helper proteins [38]. Recombinant production of VLPs can be obtained from, mainly, five systems: (a) bacteria, (b) yeast, (c) baculovirus/insect cells, (d) mammalian cells, and (e) plants, each with distinct advantages and challenges. The key determinants for choosing a suitable synthesis system to produce VLPs are the yield and the ability to scale up, the requirement on the structural complexity and immunogenicity of VLPs, process stability, flexibility for modification, safety, and cost [49,50]. The advantages and disadvantages of each system are summarized in Scheme 1.
Briefly, bacterial and yeast cells are commonly chosen for their high production yields, but limitations in achieving complex post-translational modifications (PTMs) and their reduced immunogenicity hinder their widespread adoption [51]. In contrast, baculovirus/insect cell (B/IC) systems offer versatility and high expression levels, but concerns remain regarding the co-production of baculovirus-enveloped particles and downstream processing complexities [52]. Mammalian cells enable complex PTMs, making them advantageous for VLP production, although their higher production costs and lower controllability pose challenges [52,53]. Transgenic plants offer benefits such as low processing costs and increased safety but face limitations in PTMs and expression levels. Additionally, methods like transfection and transduction play critical roles in the production, each with unique considerations for achieving high protein yields [54,55].
Another alternative system to produce VLPs can be the cell-free system. This has become an option with great potential industrial importance, especially for producing proteins that are toxic or for being able to introduce modifications with non-biological amino acids [51].
Besides the previously mentioned factors for selecting a system for VLP production, safety and the absence of side effects are particularly important considerations. These concerns involve both the production system and the nature of the VLP being produced [56,57]. For instance, eVLPs, due to their enveloped nature, may contain impurities that could cause undesired side effects. While non-eVLPs and cVLPs are also susceptible to impurities (such as those within the inner cavity or from non-specific binding), these impurities are easier to remove during the purification process [58,59]. High-scale VLP production following cGMP practices is tightly regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) of the Guidance for Industry of the Viral Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology Products from Cell Lines of Human or Animal Origin Q5A2(R2).
Ijms 25 07429 sch001
Scheme 1. Advantages and disadvantages of different expression systems for the recombinant production of VLPs. Icons created with BioRender.com [12,32,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77].
Scheme 1. Advantages and disadvantages of different expression systems for the recombinant production of VLPs. Icons created with BioRender.com [12,32,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77].
Ijms 25 07429 sch001
Finally, live animals can be used as another strategy for the expression of VLP vaccines, with more complete post-translational modifications. This system has a relatively low cost, and the strategy offers great robustness and easy mass production compared to other systems. For example, the expression system of the protozoan Leishmania tarentolae offers post-translational modifications similar to those of mammals and is not pathogenic for humans [78].

2.3. Immunological Mechanisms of VLPs

VLPs can act as antigens just like the viruses from which they originate. This can be favorable when you want to enhance the immune response (immunotherapy against tumors), but it can be harmful when trying to improve the symptoms of an autoimmune disease [38].
The size (between 20 and 200 nm) and shape of VLPs greatly facilitate a wide variety of interactions (ionic, hydrophobic, and hydrophilic) with the surface of the antigen-presenting cells (APCs), favoring their absorption [21]. Their particulate structure and repetitive antigens allow them to be absorbed efficiently and can be presented in both MHC class I and class II molecules [26,53]. The repetitive arrangement of the surface of VLPs also allows them to be recognized by B-cell receptors (BCRs), being able to induce a strong humoral response [79]. Therefore, VLP-derived peptides presented by MHC class II result in the activation of CD4+ T helper cells and in the generation of protective IgG antibody titers. Interestingly, several studies demonstrated that VLPs can also induce efficient cytotoxic T-cell responses by cross-presentation [26,80,81,82].
Furthermore, the repetitive epitopes that VLPs present can also be recognized by the innate immune system, recruiting humoral components such as natural IgM and the complement system [83]. Activation of this humoral response can also enhance B-cell activation and promote B-cell-mediated antigen deposition in follicular dendritic cells (FDC), which is essential for the formation of germinal centers and, therefore, for the generation of long-lived memory and plasma B cells. Some immunostimulatory agents or other adjuvants can be packaged with VLPs to enhance the response even more [84]. Therefore, VLPs may encapsulate drugs within their structures or attach them to the surface, offering controlled release and specific targeting of cells or other tissues by the incorporation of specific ligands [85]. In comparison, other nanovehicles may offer similar drug delivery capabilities, but with differences in release kinetics, targeting abilities, and loading capacities based on the type. These vehicles can also be functionalized to improve targeting [86].
Hence, VLPs emerge as an attractive option for vaccination, compared to live or attenuated viruses. The spectrum of production systems, the time for production (3–12 weeks), and their immunogenic properties make them a promising platform for vaccination [44,53]. Owing to these facts, the FDA approved the first VLP-derived vaccine, against Hepatitis B [87,88]. Since then, other VLP-based therapies have reached the market: Recombivax HB® (Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA) [89], Engerix® B (GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK) [90], and Sci-B-VacTM (VBI Vaccines Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) [91] for hepatitis B; Gardasil® (Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA) [92], Gardasil9® (Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Rahway, NJ, USA) [93], and Cervarix® (GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK) [94] for human papillomavirus (HPV); Hecolin® (Xiamen Innovax Biotech, Haicang, Xiamen, China) [95] for hepatitis E; and, recently, Mosquirix™ (GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK) [96] for malaria.

3. Application of VLPs in the Treatment of Allergic Diseases

The final goal of the use of VLPs in the treatment of allergies is to potentially induce immune tolerance and desensitization, promoting regulatory T-cell responses and reeducating the immune system towards a more tolerogenic state. To reach this objective, there are several approaches using modified VLPs, displaying allergenic proteins, peptides, and other molecules on their surface, by genetical fusion or chemical conjugation [37].
These formulas can also play a dual role in allergy vaccination; first, acting as an adjuvant to facilitate antigen presentation; second, helping to reduce the Th2 response, skewing the immune system towards a Th1 type response, which is important for sustained immunity to the allergen [84]. The repetitive display optimizes BCR cross-linking stimulation to produce IgG with high affinity, which is required for successful allergen neutralization [97]. In addition to that, thanks to their inherent adjuvant properties, they enhance the immune response and promote stronger and longer-lasting immunomodulatory effects [98].
VLP-based allergy treatments are reported to trigger fewer side effects compared to traditional allergen immunotherapy, with reduced systemic reactions. Allergens that have been coupled to VLPs seem to be unable to provoke anaphylactic reactions in allergic individuals because of the physicochemical differences between free allergens and the VLP-coupled ones [84]. It has also been demonstrated in vitro that allergens bound to VLPs are unable to activate mast cells, showing a strong ability to bind to surface-linked IgE. This may indicate that repetitively displaying allergens on VLPs increases their immunogenicity while reducing their potential to cause anaphylactic reactions by the inhibition of the IgE-mediated activation of mast cells [99].
There are two different main approaches for the allergy treatment with VLPs: allergen-dependent VLPs and allergen-independent VLPs (Table 1).

3.1. Allergen-Dependent VLPs

This classification comprises all VLPs that induce an allergen-dependent immunomodulation. It is based on the direct binding of VLP vehicles with specific full-length allergens or B-cell epitopes. The aim of this formula is to induce allergen-specific T-cell tolerance and the production of blocking antibodies [100]. Allergens can be displayed on the surface, but they can also packed into VLPs [37]. However, the latter is a less frequently used strategy.
This approach shows many advantages, such as the precise targeting of the molecular cause of the disease, without affecting unrelated immune responses [100]. In some murine models presented in Table 1, the prevention of systemic anaphylaxis was observed in mice treated with these platforms [97,100,101,102]. Related to adverse effects, allergens displayed on the surface of VLPs induce a weaker degranulation in effector cells compared to soluble allergens at equivalent concentrations [99]. However, it is extremely important to ensure the stability of the particle because an undesired disassembly could release a full-length allergen, which may lead to effector cell activation and anaphylaxis [103]. Moreover, the use of epitopes of major allergens is also an interesting alternative to reduce the chances of inducing unwanted reactions [97].
Several studies have been carried out about the use of these particles as allergy immunotherapy. For instance, VLP coupled to the peach major allergen Pru p 3 was produced as an immunotherapeutic formulation against peach allergy [12]. The formula consisted of the coat protein of the turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) and Pru p 3, separated by a linker. It was introduced into a highly expressed transient vector, followed by agroinfiltration in Nicotiana benthamiana. Sublingual administration of the formula in allergic mice effectively reduced some serological markers associated with allergic responses, such as anti-Pru p 3 serum IgE and serum IgG2a, with no toxicity associated. The resulting formulation exerts remarkable immunomodulatory properties without the need for potentially hazardous adjuvants [23].
Relating to peanut allergy, VLPs derived from the cucumber mosaic virus (CuMV) were used to display the peanut allergen Ara h 1, Ara h 2, or Ara R, the extract of roasted peanut [64]. The allergens were chemically coupled to the viral platform. Peanut-allergic mice were vaccinated subcutaneously with each formula and the three VLPs led to the prevention of an anaphylactic outcome. This treatment induced the development of protective IgG responses in allergic mice. The proposed mechanism is based on the competition between IgG and IgE for the allergen.
Table 1. Recent advances in the development of allergy immunotherapies based on the use of VLPs.
Table 1. Recent advances in the development of allergy immunotherapies based on the use of VLPs.
ALLERGEN-DEPENDENT
VLPTargetOrganismObserved EffectsReference
Vaccine BM32
PreS domain of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)		Phl p 1, 2, 5, 6Human
phase II clinical trial		Increase in IgG4 allergen-specific antibodies
No IgE levels enhanced		ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01538979
Monoley-murine-Leukemia Virus (MLV)Art v 1MouseSurface exposed Art v 1 VLP induces allergen-specific antibodies
Induction of Th1/Treg response		[103]
Monoley-murine-Leukemia Virus (MLV), displaying GM-CSFOva-derived peptidesMouseExpansion of CD11b+ cells within bone marrow
Induction of antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell proliferation		[75]
Acinetobacter phage AP205 fused to SpyCatcher (SpyCatcher-VLP)Der p 2MouseBlocking of allergen-specific IgG
Prevention of specific IgE		[61]
HypoCat™
Cucumber Mosaic Virus engineered with tetanus toxoid universal T-cell epitope (CuMVTT)		Fel d 1CatDevelopment of neutralizing antibodies against Fel d 1
Sustained specific IgG antibody response
Reduction in symptoms in cat owners		[60,104]
Cucumber Mosaic Virus engineered with tetanus toxoid universal T-cell epitope (CuMVTT)Ara h 1, 2, RMouseProtection of peanut-sensitized mice against anaphylaxis to the whole peanut extract
Induction of specific IgG antibodies		[64]
TM/CT domain of Influenza Virus hemagglutininDer p 2MouseStrong IgG response
Low basophil degranulation of human sera		[72]
Hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg)Che a 3-derived peptideMouseLack of IgE-binding and basophil degranulation activity
Induction of rChe a 3-related IgG antibody
Low polcalcin-specific IgE		[105]
Turnip Mosaic Virus (TuMV)Pru p 3MouseNo adjuvants needed
Reduction in allergen-specific IgE and IgG2a		[12]
Cucumber Mosaic Virus engineered with tetanus toxoid universal T-cell epitope (CuMVTT)Ara h 2MouseSignificant anti-Ara h 2 IgG response
Confer systemic protection		[102]
PreS domain of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)Bet v 1/Mal d 1-derived peptidesRabbitLack of IgE reactivity and allergenic activity
Presence of neutralizing antibodies to both allergens at the same time		[106]
Cucumber Mosaic Virus engineered with tetanus toxoid universal T-cell epitope (CuMVTT)Ara h 2Human
phase I clinical trial		Recruiting candidatesClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05476497
ALLERGEN INDEPENDENT: Immunomodulation by TLR ligands
Bacteriophage Qβ-derived VLPCpG-motif G10
(TLR9 ligand)		Human, phase IIb clinical trialImprovement of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms in dust
mite-allergic patients		ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00800332
Bacteriophage Qβ-derived VLPCpG-motif G10
(TLR9 ligand)		Human, phase II clinical trialImprovement of asthma symptoms and relief medications in
allergic patients		ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00890734
ALLERGEN INDEPENDENT: Neutralize cytokines
Hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg)Recombinant IL-13
peptide		MousePartial suppression of induced airway remodeling features
Production of anti-IL13 antibodies		[107]
Cucumber Mosaic Virus engineered with tetanus toxoid universal T-cell epitope (CuMVTT)Recombinant IL-5HorseInduction of neutralizing anti-IL-5 IgG
Reduction in eosinophil inflammation in lesions
Response maintained over a year		[108,109,110]
ALLERGEN INDEPENDENT: Neutralize allergen-specific IgE
Bacteriophage Qβ-derived VLPIgE peptides Y and PMouseStrong antibody response to IgE peptides by TLR7 activation
Production of blocking anti-IgE antibodies		[19]
Cucumber Mosaic Virus engineered with tetanus toxoid universal T-cell epitope (CuMVTT)Synthetic mouse IgE-Fc fragmentsMouseHigh amount of anti-IgE antibodies
Less IgE bound to FcεRI on the surface of basophils		[111]
These formulas could prevent the crosslinking of IgE with the FcεRI receptor, as well as inducing the direct binding of IgG with the inhibitory receptor FcγRIIb, present on mast cells and basophils. In the presence of high levels of anti-allergen IgG antibodies, IgG–immune complexes form and bind FcγRIIb, causing the inhibition of IgE-mediated signals. This emphasizes the role of allergen-complexed IgG in the regulation of anaphylaxis. Moreover, this approach induced protection against the whole peanut extract, made up of multiple allergens, not only against the allergen displayed by the VLP itself [64].
Another strategy to treat peanut allergy was the genetic fusion of the allergen Ara h 2 cDNA to CuMV VLP subunits [102]. This is different from the previously described formula, where the coupling was carried out by chemical reactions. Subcutaneous immunizations in peanut-sensitized mice with this formula resulted in an anti-Ara h 2 IgG response and the protection against both systemic and local anaphylaxis. This reconfirmed the crucial role of the inhibitory FcγRIIb receptor in cross-protection against peanut allergens other than Ara h 2, by inhibiting FcγRIIb function and observing a loss of protection. The serum from treated mice could inhibit the binding of high affinity anti-Ara h 2 IgE. In addition, the authors stated that their formula can protect against systemic anaphylaxis when used in a prophylactic immunization regimen. This hypothesis was tested by the application of the vaccine to naïve mice, who were not previously allergic to peanut extract. After treatment, the mice were sensitized, and the challenge was performed weeks later. The prophylactic immunization conferred protection against anaphylaxis, maintaining protective titers of IgG antibodies against peanut. This formula has now entered clinical development under the name of the PROTECT clinical trial [112] (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05476497).
Regarding to grass pollen allergy, one of the most relevant developed vaccine is BM32 (Biomay AG) [113,114]. The formula includes four recombinant fusion proteins consisting of the hepatitis B virus (HBV)-derived PreS fused to hypoallergenic peptides from the IgE binding sites of the timothy grass pollen allergens Phl p 1, 2, 5, and 6, adsorbed on aluminum hydroxide. A two-year double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter immunotherapy clinical trial (phase II clinical trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01538979) was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment during two consecutive grass pollen seasons. The patients received three subcutaneous injections of BM32 pre-season and a single post-season booster injection in the first year of treatment, to maintain optimal allergen-specific IgG responses. This regimen demonstrated improvement in clinical symptoms of grass pollen allergy. It induced a continuously increasing allergen-specific IgG4 response without activating allergen-specific IgE responses and maintained low stimulation of allergen-specific PBMCs. The IgG4 response was increased in the second year of immunotherapy compared to the first one; thus, clinical efficacy was observed. In addition, allergen-specific pro-inflammatory cytokine responses were not induced [113,114].
Concerning pet allergy, a creative strategy was developed to treat cat allergy in humans by the vaccination of cats with a HypoCat™ vaccine (Saiba Animal Health, Zurich, Switzerland) [104]. The formula is composed of the major cat allergen Fel d 1 and a VLP derived from CuMV with the tetanus toxin-derived universal T-cell epitope tt830-843 (CuMVTT) [60]. After subcutaneous vaccination, cats induced a strong specific IgG antibody response in cat owners, leading to the development of neutralizing antibodies against the allergen, thus reducing its endogenous level. The vaccine was well tolerated and had no toxic effects. A persistent reduction in symptoms over the study period was observed in cat owners, and even the total prevention of allergic reactions was reported in some individuals [104].

3.2. Allergen-Independent VLPs

These strategies are based on VLPs triggering an allergen-independent immunomodulation. This can be divided into (a) immunomodulation by TLR ligands, (b) VLPs priming the production of neutralizing antibodies against typical allergy cytokines, and (c) VLPs leading to the generation of neutralizing/blocking antibodies against allergen-specific IgE and their receptors, FcεRs [100].

3.2.1. Immunomodulation by TLR Ligands

One of the strategies followed in allergy is trying to switch from a Th2 response and induce a Th1-biased response [115,116]. This can be achieved by exposing VLPs coupled to PRR receptor ligands, such as TLRs. Generally, this strategy is based on the immunological activation of TLR9 [37,100].
This approach is based on the use of VLPs based on single-stranded RNA bacteriophages, which are capable of self-assembly [117]. However, it has been found that the capsid of these viruses can also self-assemble in the presence of synthetic CpG-rich oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) that are able to activate TLR9 [118]. In humans, TLR9 is expressed mainly by plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) and B cells. While pDCs generate type I interferons (particularly IFN-α) in response to TLR9 activation, the primary outcomes of TLR9 signaling are recognized to be the secretion of cytokines and chemokines that support Th1 immune responses. These include substances such as monocyte inflammatory protein-1, IFN-γ, and the promotion of IgG class switching in B cells [119]. Thus, some experiments began to evaluate the potential of using these CpG-VLPs to reprogram Th2 allergic response to Th1-biased responses.
All published information consists of CYT003, a treatment involving QβG10, a CpG-VLP based on bacteriophage Qβ [120]. Supported by promising previous studies [121] (Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00652223), a phase IIb clinical trial involving 299 participants was carried out by the subcutaneous injections of QβG10 in house dust mite-allergic patients with rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms. The treatment was shown to be harmless, and it significantly reduced symptoms compared to the placebo group. In addition, these patients reduced their intake of medication associated with allergic symptoms, improving their quality of life, and showed a 10-fold increase in tolerance to the conjunctival provocation dose in the high-dose group [122] (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00800332).
Based on the same approach, a second study was carried out with QβG10 VLP CYT003. Sixty-three allergic asthmatic patients with moderate or high steroid intake were treated with Qβ subcutaneous injections. All patients who received the treatment improved symptomatically in the first 12 weeks, having controlled asthma after that week, reducing the amount of steroid intake [123] (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00890734).
This type of treatment is ideal for individuals without a clear sensitization profile or who are sensitized to complex allergen sources. However, it is not specific for any type of allergen [100]. In fact, its application in allergy did not last much longer. The latest clinical trial conducted in 2014 yielded data contradictory to the trend hitherto observed. A total of 365 patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, who were being treated with inhaled steroids, were treated subcutaneously with CYT003. No significant improvement over the placebo group was observed [124] (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01673672). Since then, no further clinical trials have been conducted with this type of approach, or they were even withdrawn after starting due to lack of results (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02087644).

3.2.2. VLPs Coupled with Cytokines

This type of formula primes the production of neutralizing autoantibodies against typical allergy cytokines, which are necessary to induce and maintain allergic inflammation. This is achieved by the direct coupling of VLPs with type 2 effector cytokines [37,100]. This approach is based on active immunization. The current main and most widespread competitor is passive immunization with monoclonal antibodies, which has become an important treatment option for atopic and allergic diseases [125,126,127].
Our immune system develops tolerance against our proteins, and therefore, the vaccine against cytokines (and IgE) requires overcoming this tolerance. The binding of cytokines to a source of Th cell epitopes, such as VLPs, can drive specific B-cell responses and trigger the induction of IgG autoantibodies against these inflammatory mediators [37]. This is similar to what happens in carbohydrate conjugate vaccines, where B cells recognize the carbohydrate and Th cells recognize the carrier protein to which the carbohydrates are attached [83]. This formula triggers a long-term and polyclonal response against targeted molecules. Thanks to polyclonality, less induction of anti-drug antibodies is observed, which is one of the main drawbacks of monoclonal antibodies. Moreover, the formula requires a more limited number of vaccine doses [100], and it is quite cost-effective. In terms of immunological response, the administration of VLP bound to Th2 cytokines showed a marked reduction in well-known hallmarks of allergic diseases and asthma in animal models. The active induction of anti-cytokines antibodies was also observed in the majority of VLPs formulas [37,100].
Several formulas of VLPs with cytokines such as IL4 [128], IL-5 [129], IL-13 [79], IL-33 [130], etc., have been tested. One of the most remarkable studies involved the genetic fusion of an IL-13 peptide to the hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg). The subcutaneous administration of this treatment in mice successfully broke tolerance, inducing the production of anti-IL13-specific antibodies. This led to significantly diminished IL-13 concentrations, fewer inflammatory cells in the bronchoalveolar fluid, and a drop in lung mucus production and collagen deposition. As a result, this VLP significantly reduced lung inflammation, remodeling, and hyperresponsiveness, thus limiting asthma exacerbations in the animal model [78].
More recently, some approaches against IL-5, the master regulator of eosinophils, have been developed. For instance, the subcutaneous vaccination with equine IL-5 coupled to a CuMVTT, showed promising results in horses suffering from chronic allergic dermatitis caused by insect bites [108]. The aim was to strongly dampen eosinophil recruitment and expansion. It resulted in the induction of anti–eIL-5 antibody titers. This significantly improved the horses’ symptoms related to this chronic relapsing allergic dermatitis. In addition, one year later, they assessed a second follow-up to analyze the potential for long-term therapy [109]. The horses showed even more improvement in the disease in their second vaccination year, confirming that responses could be maintained over the seasons by yearly vaccination against IL-5. Therefore, this may be a long-term solution for the treatment of eosinophil-mediated diseases. Moreover, the authors guaranteed the safety of the formula, ensuring it did not induce auto-reactive IL-5-specific T-cell responses [110]. This was a successful immunotherapeutic approach in horses, and it might shed light on the development of a similar treatment in humans.
When developing this kind of treatment, there are other aspects to take into consideration. As we mentioned before, the breakage of tolerance may lead to adverse effects, such as autoimmune diseases, immunodeficiency, reactivation of latent infections, or even impact tissue remodeling [100]. In addition, once the administration has been performed, their effects are hard to reverse. This is due to the establishment of long-lived plasma cells or vaccine-induced B-cell memory cells, which would be difficult to remove from that moment on [100]. This is clearly different from monoclonal antibodies, whose administration can be stopped, and the effects will disappear after some weeks, without further complications [131]. Another potential issue is the possibility of potentiating the function of cytokines instead of mitigating it, due to an increase in the activity of the cytokines by prolonging their half-life, for example. In addition, some cytokines have been proved to retain their biological activity bound to VLPs, leading to potential adverse effects, such as cytokines storm [100], while other VLPs can be used to treat the cytokine storm syndrome [132,133].

3.2.3. Neutralizing/Blocking Antibodies against Allergen-Specific IgE

The last strategy to counteract allergies is based on the elimination of IgE-producing cells or the neutralization of the function of IgE itself. Tolerance to IgE or FcεRs could be altered by inducing autoantibodies or blocking antibodies [37]. This can be achieved by targeting IgE, its specific receptor FcεRs, and IgE-producing B/plasma cells [100]. Several studies have already used these approaches, with positive results.
A first example is a study in 2007, where three synthetic peptides of the human IgE receptor-binding site of IgE conjugated with HBsAg VLP were produced. This vaccine was injected subcutaneously to rats and mice sensitized to trichosanthin. The vaccinated animals presented low IgE-antibody levels in serum, and they generated blocking FcεR antibodies. However, they did not interact with FcεR-bound rat IgE, showing the non-anaphylactogenicity of the induced autoantibodies [134].
Subsequent studies have shown the importance of innate danger signals in VLP-derived vaccines. For example, it has been demonstrated that QβG10 conjugated with two IgE peptides could stimulate the innate immune system in mice, resulting in the production of blocking anti-IgE antibodies. However, this effect was significantly reduced in TLR7 knockout mice. When mixed with adjuvants such as alum or CpG, no reduction in antibody production was observed in the TLR7 knockout mice [19].
However, few other examples could be found until 2024, when Gharailoo et al. (2024) developed a CuMVTT VLP immunotherapy with chemically bound IgE-Fc fragments. This new strategy was tested in Fel d 1-sensitized mice. Mice immunized with these subcutaneous vaccines produced anti-IgE IgGs and blocked anaphylaxis upon challenge with the allergen [111].
This kind of methodology has the great advantage of generation of blocking antibodies, which inhibit the binding between IgE and its receptors and reduce IgE serum levels. However, no human clinical trials have been conducted. In addition, the main drawback is the production of autoantibodies, with their related side effects, as mentioned before.
In summary, Figure 3 aims to depict in a single snapshot the variety of immunological mechanisms behind the use of VLPs to treat allergy, based on the data in this review.

4. Conclusions

Virus-like particles have emerged as a novel and promising approach for the treatment of allergic diseases. Within the array of nanoparticles used as biotechnological tools, VLPs show advantages that make them a rational choice. Their structure, resembling their viral origin, along with their repetitive patterns and size is very efficient in promoting entry into the lymphatic system, especially in their uptake and presentation by APCs [103,135]. They show a low or non-toxic profile, are biodegradable and, in many cases, resistant to proteases [54,136]. Moreover, their key capability is to pack molecules of interest within their inner cavity, as well as the possibility of presenting antigens coupled chemically or by genetic fusion [38,137].
Regardless of the coupling method, VLPs display the attached proteins in an ordered and repetitive structure, increasing their immunogenicity, their concentration, and avoiding degradation [138,139]. Thanks to recent advances in genetic engineering, the capacity of VLPs to carry and present more antigens will be optimized. Bioinformatic tools will also be crucial for designing chimeric proteins with improved physicochemical characteristics for antigen displaying in VLPs [140,141]. In this regard, the size of the attached molecule is a very important aspect to consider and may present a challenge for the correct folding of the formula and for antigenic presentation [142,143,144].
Considering that structure and function are closely intertwined, the immunogenic properties must be taken into consideration when optimizing VLPs’ structure. As previously mentioned, the repetitive antigen display in VLPs enhances uptake by APCs, promotes antigen-specific responses, B-cell activation, etc. [52,53,55]. Previous reports have suggested the development of neutralizing IgG/IgM antibodies, which seem to opsonize VLPs, with interesting consequences in their efficacy [145,146]. This type of response needs to be considered when choosing a VLP platform. For example, the viruses on which some VLPs are based, such as norovirus or hepatitis virus, might have been previously presented to our immune system, thus altering the expected response. However, other VLPs, such as plant viruses or bacteriophage Qβ, are immunologically inert [135].
As shown in this review, VLPs are powerful and promising tools, with many in vivo studies, but very few cases reaching clinical trials. This is, in a way, reasonable, given the short period of time since the beginning of using VLPs and the many aspects to be analyzed and optimized. In this regard, it is also important to consider the route of administration, use of adjuvants, quantity, duration, side effects, etc. For instance, there are VLPs presented here that display one allergen on their surface and other examples of VLPs that combine antigen + adjuvant (see Table 1). There are examples of promising results with different presentations, such as those based on VLPs packaging an allergen, where the authors show the establishment of a Th1-Treg response that promotes the reduction of airway hyperresponsiveness [103,147].
These conclusions reflect on the potential of applying VLPs for the treatment of allergic diseases. The data obtained so far show promising results, indicating beneficial immunomodulatory effects and increased safety. Still, there are many unresolved questions to fully understand the mechanisms of protection that VLPs promise, with the final goal of their applicability in human therapy.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, H.B.-H. and G.V.-P.; writing—review and editing, H.B.-H., G.V.-P., M.G.-A., A.D.-P. and J.T.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

G.V.-P. was financially supported by CEX2020-000999-S, funded by MICINN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, and the grant PRE2021-100446, funded by MICINN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by FSE+. This work was supported and funded by the LISENTRA project: PID2020-113629RB-I00.

Acknowledgments

Molecular graphics were performed using UCSF ChimeraX, developed by the Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco, with support from the National Institutes of Health R01-GM129325 and the Office of Cyber Infrastructure and Computational Biology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

AIT: allergen-specific immunotherapy, APC: antigen-presenting cell, B/IC: baculovirus/ insect cell, BCR: B-cell antigen receptor, CuMV: cucumber mosaic virus, CuMVTT: CuMV with tetanus toxin-derived universal T-cell epitope tt830-843, cVLP: chimeric VLP, DC: dendritic cell, EMA: European Medicines Agency, eVLP: enveloped VLP, FcεRI: high-affinity receptor for the Fc region of IgE, FcγRIIb: Fc fragment of IgG receptor IIb, FDA: Food and Drug Administration, FDC: follicular dendritic cell, GMP: good manufacturing procedures, HBcAg: hepatitis B core antigen, HBV: hepatitis B virus, MHC: major histocompatibility complex, MLV: Monoley murine leukemia Virus, non-eVLP: non-enveloped VLP, ODN: oligodeoxynucleotide, pDC: plasmacytoid dendritic cell, PRR: pattern recognition receptor, PTM: post-translational modification, TLR: toll-like receptor, TuMV: turnip mosaic virus, VLP: virus-like particle.

References

  1. Bartha, I.; Almulhem, N.; Santos, A.F. Feast for Thought: A Comprehensive Review of Food Allergy 2021–2023. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2024, 153, 576–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sampath, V.; Abrams, E.M.; Adlou, B.; Akdis, C.; Akdis, M.; Brough, H.A.; Chan, S.; Chatchatee, P.; Chinthrajah, R.S.; Cocco, R.R.; et al. Food Allergy across the Globe. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 148, 1347–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Scheurer, S.; Van Ree, R.; Vieths, S. The Role of Lipid Transfer Proteins as Food and Pollen Allergens Outside the Mediterranean Area. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2021, 21, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Missaoui, K.; Gonzalez-Klein, Z.; Pazos-Castro, D.; Hernandez-Ramirez, G.; Garrido-Arandia, M.; Brini, F.; Diaz-Perales, A.; Tome-Amat, J. Plant Non-Specific Lipid Transfer Proteins: An Overview. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 171, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tome-Amat, J.; Gonzalez-Klein, Z.; Pazos-Castro, D.; Resuela-Gonzalez, J.L.; Vilchez-Pinto, G.; Berreiros-Hortala, H.; Palacio-Garcia, L.; Fernandez-Bravo, S.; Esteban, V.; Diaz-Perales, A.; et al. Plant Lipid Transfer Proteins’ Ligand Enhances Allergic Sensitization to Non-related Proteins in Murine Models. Allergy 2024, 79, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Barber, D.; Diaz-Perales, A.; Escribese, M.M.; Kleine-Tebbe, J.; Matricardi, P.M.; Ollert, M.; Santos, A.F.; Sastre, J. Molecular Allergology and Its Impact in Specific Allergy Diagnosis and Therapy. Allergy 2021, 76, 3642–3658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pajno, G.B.; Fernandez-Rivas, M.; Arasi, S.; Roberts, G.; Akdis, C.A.; Alvaro-Lozano, M.; Beyer, K.; Bindslev-Jensen, C.; Burks, W.; Ebisawa, M.; et al. EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy: IgE-mediated Food Allergy. Allergy 2018, 73, 799–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Johnson, L.; Duschl, A.; Himly, M. Nanotechnology-Based Vaccines for Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy: Potentials and Challenges of Conventional and Novel Adjuvants under Research. Vaccines 2020, 8, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hughes, K.R.; Saunders, M.N.; Landers, J.J.; Janczak, K.W.; Turkistani, H.; Rad, L.M.; Miller, S.D.; Podojil, J.R.; Shea, L.D.; O’Konek, J.J. Masked Delivery of Allergen in Nanoparticles Safely Attenuates Anaphylactic Response in Murine Models of Peanut Allergy. Front. Allergy 2022, 3, 829605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sampath, V.; Sindher, S.B.; Alvarez Pinzon, A.M.; Nadeau, K.C. Can Food Allergy Be Cured? What Are the Future Prospects? Allergy 2020, 75, 1316–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bruton, K.; Koenig, J.F.E.; Phelps, A.; Jordana, M. Perturbations to Homeostasis in Experimental Models Revealed Innate Pathways Driving Food Allergy. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 603272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pazos-Castro, D.; Margain, C.; Gonzalez-Klein, Z.; Amores-Borge, M.; Yuste-Calvo, C.; Garrido-Arandia, M.; Zurita, L.; Esteban, V.; Tome-Amat, J.; Diaz-Perales, A.; et al. Suitability of Potyviral Recombinant Virus-like Particles Bearing a Complete Food Allergen for Immunotherapy Vaccines. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 986823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Curin, M.; Khaitov, M.; Karaulov, A.; Namazova-Baranova, L.; Campana, R.; Garib, V.; Valenta, R. Next-Generation of Allergen-Specific Immunotherapies: Molecular Approaches. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018, 18, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Reguraman, N.; Hassani, A.; Philip, P.S.; Pich, D.; Hammerschmidt, W.; Khan, G. Assessing the Efficacy of VLP-Based Vaccine against Epstein-Barr Virus Using a Rabbit Model. Vaccines 2023, 11, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hemmati, F.; Hemmati-Dinarvand, M.; Karimzade, M.; Rutkowska, D.; Eskandari, M.H.; Khanizadeh, S.; Afsharifar, A. Plant-Derived VLP: A Worthy Platform to Produce Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Biotechnol. Lett. 2022, 44, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ikwuagwu, B.; Tullman-Ercek, D. Virus-like Particles for Drug Delivery: A Review of Methods and Applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022, 78, 102785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mohsen, M.O.; Bachmann, M.F. Virus-like Particle Vaccinology, from Bench to Bedside. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2022, 19, 993–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, J.; Zhou, K.; Wang, Q. Tailoring the Self-Assembly Behaviors of Recombinant Tobacco Mosaic Virus by Rationally Introducing Covalent Bonding at the Protein–Protein Interface. Small 2016, 12, 4955–4959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Akache, B.; Weeratna, R.; Deora, A.; Thorn, J.; Champion, B.; Merson, J.; Davis, H.; McCluskie, M. Anti-IgE Qb-VLP Conjugate Vaccine Self-Adjuvants through Activation of TLR7. Vaccines 2016, 4, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Le, D.T.; Müller, K.M. In Vitro Assembly of Virus-Like Particles and Their Applications. Life 2021, 11, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chung, Y.H.; Cai, H.; Steinmetz, N.F. Viral Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery, Imaging, Immunotherapy, and Theranostic Applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020, 156, 214–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shahgolzari, M.; Pazhouhandeh, M.; Milani, M.; Yari Khosroushahi, A.; Fiering, S. Plant Viral Nanoparticles for Packaging and in Vivo Delivery of Bioactive Cargos. WIREs Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2020, 12, e1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jensen-Jarolim, E.; Bachmann, M.F.; Bonini, S.; Jacobsen, L.; Jutel, M.; Klimek, L.; Mahler, V.; Mösges, R.; Moingeon, P.; O’Hehir, R.E.; et al. State-of-the-art in Marketed Adjuvants and Formulations in Allergen Immunotherapy: A Position Paper of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI). Allergy 2020, 75, 746–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nooraei, S.; Bahrulolum, H.; Hoseini, Z.S.; Katalani, C.; Hajizade, A.; Easton, A.J.; Ahmadian, G. Virus-like Particles: Preparation, Immunogenicity and Their Roles as Nanovaccines and Drug Nanocarriers. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Veneziano, R.; Moyer, T.J.; Stone, M.B.; Wamhoff, E.-C.; Read, B.J.; Mukherjee, S.; Shepherd, T.R.; Das, J.; Schief, W.R.; Irvine, D.J.; et al. Role of Nanoscale Antigen Organization on B-Cell Activation Probed Using DNA Origami. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zepeda-Cervantes, J.; Ramírez-Jarquín, J.O.; Vaca, L. Interaction Between Virus-Like Particles (VLPs) and Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) From Dendritic Cells (DCs): Toward Better Engineering of VLPs. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zeltins, A.; West, J.; Zabel, F.; El Turabi, A.; Balke, I.; Haas, S.; Maudrich, M.; Storni, F.; Engeroff, P.; Jennings, G.T.; et al. Incorporation of Tetanus-Epitope into Virus-like Particles Achieves Vaccine Responses Even in Older Recipients in Models of Psoriasis, Alzheimer’s and Cat Allergy. npj Vaccines 2017, 2, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gonzalez-Castro, R.; Acero Galindo, G.; García Salcedo, Y.; Uribe Campero, L.; Vazquez Perez, V.; Carrillo-Tripp, M.; Gevorkian, G.; Gomez Lim, M.A. Plant-Based Chimeric HPV-Virus-like Particles Bearing Amyloid-β Epitopes Elicit Antibodies Able to Recognize Amyloid Plaques in APP-Tg Mouse and Alzheimer’s Disease Brains. Inflammopharmacology 2018, 26, 817–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Von Loga, I.S.; El-Turabi, A.; Jostins, L.; Miotla-Zarebska, J.; Mackay-Alderson, J.; Zeltins, A.; Parisi, I.; Bachmann, M.F.; Vincent, T.L. Active Immunisation Targeting Nerve Growth Factor Attenuates Chronic Pain Behaviour in Murine Osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019, 78, 672–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Crossey, E.; Amar, M.J.A.; Sampson, M.; Peabody, J.; Schiller, J.T.; Chackerian, B.; Remaley, A.T. A Cholesterol-Lowering VLP Vaccine That Targets PCSK9. Vaccine 2015, 33, 5747–5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ortega-Rivera, O.A.; Shin, M.D.; Moreno-Gonzalez, M.A.; Pokorski, J.K.; Steinmetz, N.F. A Single-Dose Qβ VLP Vaccine against S100A9 Protein Reduces Atherosclerosis in a Preclinical Model. Adv. Ther. 2022, 5, 2200092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tomé-Amat, J.; Fleischer, L.; Parker, S.A.; Bardliving, C.L.; Batt, C.A. Secreted Production of Assembled Norovirus Virus-like Particles from Pichia Pastoris. Microb. Cell Fact. 2014, 13, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lizotte, P.H.; Wen, A.M.; Sheen, M.R.; Fields, J.; Rojanasopondist, P.; Steinmetz, N.F.; Fiering, S. In Situ Vaccination with Cowpea Mosaic Virus Nanoparticles Suppresses Metastatic Cancer. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, K.R.; Lee, A.S.; Kim, S.M.; Heo, H.R.; Kim, C.S. Virus-like Nanoparticles as a Theranostic Platform for Cancer. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 10, 1106767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pardi, N.; Weissman, D. Development of Vaccines and Antivirals for Combating Viral Pandemics. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 4, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Naskalska, A.; Pyrć, K. Virus Like Particles as Immunogens and Universal Nanocarriers. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Anzaghe, M.; Schülke, S.; Scheurer, S. Virus-Like Particles as Carrier Systems to Enhance Immunomodulation in Allergen Immunotherapy. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018, 18, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tariq, H.; Batool, S.; Asif, S.; Ali, M.; Abbasi, B.H. Virus-Like Particles: Revolutionary Platforms for Developing Vaccines Against Emerging Infectious Diseases. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 790121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pitoiset, F.; Vazquez, T.; Bellier, B. Enveloped Virus-like Particle Platforms: Vaccines of the Future? Expert Rev. Vaccines 2015, 14, 913–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Deng, F. Advances and Challenges in Enveloped Virus-like Particle (VLP)-Based Vaccines. J. Immunol. Sci. 2018, 2, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lua, L.H.L.; Connors, N.K.; Sainsbury, F.; Chuan, Y.P.; Wibowo, N.; Middelberg, A.P.J. Bioengineering Virus-like Particles as Vaccines. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2014, 111, 425–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pacios, L.F.; Sánchez, F.; Ponz, F. Intrinsic Disorder in the Dynamic Evolution of Structure, Stability, and Flexibility of Potyviral VLP Assemblies: A Computational Study. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 254, 127798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rohovie, M.J.; Nagasawa, M.; Swartz, J.R. Virus-like Particles: Next-generation Nanoparticles for Targeted Therapeutic Delivery. Bioeng. Transla Med. 2017, 2, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mohsen, M.O.; Zha, L.; Cabral-Miranda, G.; Bachmann, M.F. Major Findings and Recent Advances in Virus–like Particle (VLP)-Based Vaccines. Semin. Immunol. 2017, 34, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Guo, J.; Zhou, A.; Sun, X.; Sha, W.; Ai, K.; Pan, G.; Zhou, C.; Zhou, H.; Cong, H.; He, S. Immunogenicity of a Virus-Like-Particle Vaccine Containing Multiple Antigenic Epitopes of Toxoplasma Gondii Against Acute and Chronic Toxoplasmosis in Mice. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mittal, M.; Banerjee, M.; Lua, L.H.; Rathore, A.S. Current Status and Future Challenges in Transitioning to Continuous Bioprocessing of Virus-like Particles. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2022, 97, 2376–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Charlton Hume, H.K.; Vidigal, J.; Carrondo, M.J.T.; Middelberg, A.P.J.; Roldão, A.; Lua, L.H.L. Synthetic Biology for Bioengineering Virus-like Particle Vaccines. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2019, 116, 919–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mohsen, M.O.; Augusto, G.; Bachmann, M.F. The 3Ds in Virus-like Particle Based-vaccines: “Design, Delivery and Dynamics”. Immunol. Rev. 2020, 296, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Syomin, B.V.; Ilyin, Y.V. Virus-Like Particles as an Instrument of Vaccine Production. Mol. Biol. 2019, 53, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vicente, T.; Roldão, A.; Peixoto, C.; Carrondo, M.J.T.; Alves, P.M. Large-Scale Production and Purification of VLP-Based Vaccines. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2011, 107, S42–S48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhang, L.; Xu, W.; Ma, X.; Sun, X.; Fan, J.; Wang, Y. Virus-like Particles as Antiviral Vaccine: Mechanism, Design, and Application. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2023, 28, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Fuenmayor, J.; Gòdia, F.; Cervera, L. Production of Virus-like Particles for Vaccines. New Biotechnol. 2017, 39, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gao, Y.; Wijewardhana, C.; Mann, J.F.S. Virus-Like Particle, Liposome, and Polymeric Particle-Based Vaccines against HIV-1. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shirbaghaee, Z.; Bolhassani, A. Different Applications of Virus-like Particles in Biology and Medicine: Vaccination and Delivery Systems. Biopolymers 2016, 105, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Masavuli, M.G.; Wijesundara, D.K.; Torresi, J.; Gowans, E.J.; Grubor-Bauk, B. Preclinical Development and Production of Virus-Like Particles As Vaccine Candidates for Hepatitis C. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Rodrigues, T.; Alves, A.; Lopes, A.; Carrondo, M.J.T.; Alves, P.M.; Cruz, P.E. Removal of Envelope Protein-free Retroviral Vectors by Anion-exchange Chromatography to Improve Product Quality. J. Sep. Sci. 2008, 31, 3509–3518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Thompson, C.M.; Petiot, E.; Mullick, A.; Aucoin, M.G.; Henry, O.; Kamen, A.A. Critical Assessment of Influenza VLP Production in Sf9 and HEK293 Expression Systems. BMC Biotechnol. 2015, 15, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Cervera, L.; Gòdia, F.; Tarrés-Freixas, F.; Aguilar-Gurrieri, C.; Carrillo, J.; Blanco, J.; Gutiérrez-Granados, S. Production of HIV-1-Based Virus-like Particles for Vaccination: Achievements and Limits. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 7367–7384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhao, D.; Sun, B.; Jiang, H.; Sun, S.; Kong, F.T.; Ma, Y.; Jiang, L.; Bai, L.; Chen, X.; Yang, P.; et al. Enterovirus71 Virus-like Particles Produced from Insect Cells and Purified by Multistep Chromatography Elicit Strong Humoral Immune Responses in Mice. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 1196–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Thoms, F.; Jennings, G.T.; Maudrich, M.; Vogel, M.; Haas, S.; Zeltins, A.; Hofmann-Lehmann, R.; Riond, B.; Grossmann, J.; Hunziker, P.; et al. Immunization of Cats to Induce Neutralizing Antibodies against Fel d 1, the Major Feline Allergen in Human Subjects. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 144, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Soongrung, T.; Mongkorntanyatip, K.; Peepim, T.; Jitthamstaporn, S.; Pitakpolrat, P.; Kaewamatawong, T.; Janitzek, C.M.; Thrane, S.; Sander, A.F.; Jacquet, A. Virus-like Particles Displaying Major House Dust Mite Allergen Der p 2 for Prophylactic Allergen Immunotherapy. Allergy 2020, 75, 1232–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hou, L.; Wu, H.; Xu, L.; Yang, F. Expression and Self-Assembly of Virus-like Particles of Infectious Hypodermal and Hematopoietic Necrosis Virus in Escherichia coli. Arch. Virol. 2009, 154, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Fromentin, R.; Majeau, N.; Gagné, M.-E.L.; Boivin, A.; Duvignaud, J.-B.; Leclerc, D. A Method for in Vitro Assembly of Hepatitis C Virus Core Protein and for Screening of Inhibitors. Anal. Biochem. 2007, 366, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Storni, F.; Zeltins, A.; Balke, I.; Heath, M.D.; Kramer, M.F.; Skinner, M.A.; Zha, L.; Roesti, E.; Engeroff, P.; Muri, L.; et al. Vaccine against Peanut Allergy Based on Engineered Virus-like Particles Displaying Single Major Peanut Allergens. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 145, 1240–1253.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hirschberg, S.; Layton, G.T.; Harris, S.J.; Savage, N.; Dallman, M.J.; Lamb, J.R. CD4+ T Cells Induced by Virus-like Particles Expressing a Major T Cell Epitope down-Regulate IL-5 Production in an Ongoing Immune Response to Der p 1 Independently of IFN-γ Production. Int. Immunol. 1999, 11, 1927–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cimica, V.; Galarza, J.M. Adjuvant Formulations for Virus-like Particle (VLP) Based Vaccines. Clin. Immunol. 2017, 183, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Norkiene, M.; Stonyte, J.; Ziogiene, D.; Mazeike, E.; Sasnauskas, K.; Gedvilaite, A. Production of Recombinant VP1-Derived Virus-like Particles from Novel Human Polyomaviruses in Yeast. BMC Biotechnol. 2015, 15, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sari-Ak, D.; Bahrami, S.; Laska, M.J.; Drncova, P.; Fitzgerald, D.J.; Schaffitzel, C.; Garzoni, F.; Berger, I. High-Throughput Production of Influenza Virus-Like Particle (VLP) Array by Using VLP-FactoryTM, a MultiBac Baculoviral Genome Customized for Enveloped VLP Expression. In High-Throughput Protein Production and Purification; Vincentelli, R., Ed.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 2025, pp. 213–226. ISBN 978-1-4939-9623-0. [Google Scholar]
  69. Sequeira, D.P.; Correia, R.; Carrondo, M.J.T.; Roldão, A.; Teixeira, A.P.; Alves, P.M. Combining Stable Insect Cell Lines with Baculovirus-Mediated Expression for Multi-HA Influenza VLP Production. Vaccine 2018, 36, 3112–3123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Sun, Y.; Carrion, R.; Ye, L.; Wen, Z.; Ro, Y.-T.; Brasky, K.; Ticer, A.E.; Schwegler, E.E.; Patterson, J.L.; Compans, R.W.; et al. Corrigendum to “Protection against Lethal Challenge by Ebola Virus-like Particles Produced in Insect Cells” [Virology 383 (2009) 12–21]. Virology 2010, 399, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lechmann, M. Hepatitis C Virus–like Particles Induce Virus-Specific Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses in Mice. Hepatology 2001, 34, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gomord, V.; Stordeur, V.; Fitchette, A.-C.; Fixman, E.D.; Tropper, G.; Garnier, L.; Desgagnes, R.; Viel, S.; Couillard, J.; Beauverger, G.; et al. Design, Production and Immunomodulatory Potency of a Novel Allergen Bioparticle. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0242867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pietersen, I.; Van Zyl, A.; Rybicki, E.; Hitzeroth, I. Novel Production of Bovine Papillomavirus Pseudovirions in Tobacco Plants. Pathogens 2020, 9, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ward, B.J.; Makarkov, A.; Séguin, A.; Pillet, S.; Trépanier, S.; Dhaliwall, J.; Libman, M.D.; Vesikari, T.; Landry, N. Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of a Plant-Derived, Quadrivalent, Virus-like Particle Influenza Vaccine in Adults (18–64 Years) and Older Adults (≥65 Years): Two Multicentre, Randomised Phase 3 Trials. Lancet 2020, 396, 1491–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gogesch, P.; Schülke, S.; Scheurer, S.; Mühlebach, M.D.; Waibler, Z. Modular MLV-VLPs Co-Displaying Ovalbumin Peptides and GM-CSF Effectively Induce Expansion of CD11b+ APC and Antigen-Specific T Cell Responses in Vitro. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 101, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Buffin, S.; Peubez, I.; Barrière, F.; Nicolaï, M.-C.; Tapia, T.; Dhir, V.; Forma, E.; Sève, N.; Legastelois, I. Influenza A and B Virus-like Particles Produced in Mammalian Cells Are Highly Immunogenic and Induce Functional Antibodies. Vaccine 2019, 37, 6857–6867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wu, C.-Y.; Yeh, Y.-C.; Yang, Y.-C.; Chou, C.; Liu, M.-T.; Wu, H.-S.; Chan, J.-T.; Hsiao, P.-W. Mammalian Expression of Virus-Like Particles for Advanced Mimicry of Authentic Influenza Virus. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Panasiuk, M.; Zimmer, K.; Czarnota, A.; Grzyb, K.; Narajczyk, M.; Peszyńska-Sularz, G.; Żołędowska, S.; Nidzworski, D.; Hovhannisyan, L.; Gromadzka, B. Immunization with Leishmania Tarentolae-Derived Norovirus Virus-like Particles Elicits High Humoral Response and Stimulates the Production of Neutralizing Antibodies. Microb. Cell Fact. 2021, 20, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Foerster, J.; Molęda, A. Virus-Like Particle-Mediated Vaccination against Interleukin-13 May Harbour General Anti-Allergic Potential beyond Atopic Dermatitis. Viruses 2020, 12, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Schwarz, B.; Douglas, T. Development of Virus-like Particles for Diagnostic and Prophylactic Biomedical Applications. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2015, 7, 722–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Boisgérault, F.; Morón, G.; Leclerc, C. Virus-like Particles: A New Family of Delivery Systems. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2002, 1, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pattinson, D.J.; Apte, S.H.; Wibowo, N.; Rivera-Hernandez, T.; Groves, P.L.; Middelberg, A.P.J.; Doolan, D.L. Chimeric Virus-Like Particles and Capsomeres Induce Similar CD8+ T Cell Responses but Differ in Capacity to Induce CD4+ T Cell Responses and Antibody Responses. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 564627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Bachmann, M.F.; El-Turabi, A.; Fettelschoss-Gabriel, A.; Vogel, M. The Prospects of an Active Vaccine Against Asthma Targeting IL-5. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Klimek, L.; Kündig, T.; Kramer, M.F.; Guethoff, S.; Jensen-Jarolim, E.; Schmidt-Weber, C.B.; Palomares, O.; Mohsen, M.O.; Jakob, T.; Bachmann, M. Virus-like Particles (VLP) in Prophylaxis and Immunotherapy of Allergic Diseases. Allergo J. Int. 2018, 27, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Alvandi, N.; Rajabnejad, M.; Taghvaei, Z.; Esfandiari, N. New Generation of Viral Nanoparticles for Targeted Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy. J. Drug Target. 2022, 30, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Fan, D.; Cao, Y.; Cao, M.; Wang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Gong, T. Nanomedicine in Cancer Therapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Greiner, V.J.; Ronzon, F.; Larquet, E.; Desbat, B.; Estèves, C.; Bonvin, J.; Gréco, F.; Manin, C.; Klymchenko, A.S.; Mély, Y. The Structure of HBsAg Particles Is Not Modified upon Their Adsorption on Aluminium Hydroxide Gel. Vaccine 2012, 30, 5240–5245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Moradi Vahdat, M.; Hemmati, F.; Ghorbani, A.; Rutkowska, D.; Afsharifar, A.; Eskandari, M.H.; Rezaei, N.; Niazi, A. Hepatitis B Core-Based Virus-like Particles: A Platform for Vaccine Development in Plants. Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 29, e00605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Venters, C.; Graham, W.; Cassidy, W. Recombivax-HB: Perspectives Past, Present and Future. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2004, 3, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Joe, C.C.D.; Chatterjee, S.; Lovrecz, G.; Adams, T.E.; Thaysen-Andersen, M.; Walsh, R.; Locarnini, S.A.; Smooker, P.; Netter, H.J. Glycoengineered Hepatitis B Virus-like Particles with Enhanced Immunogenicity. Vaccine 2020, 38, 3892–3901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Diaz-Mitoma, F.; Popovic, V.; Spaans, J.N. Assessment of Immunogenicity and Safety across Two Manufacturing Lots of a 3-Antigen Hepatitis B Vaccine, Sci-B-Vac®, Compared with Engerix-B® in Healthy Asian Adults: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. Vaccine 2021, 39, 3892–3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Shi, L.; Sings, H.L.; Bryan, J.T.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y.; Mach, H.; Kosinski, M.; Washabaugh, M.W.; Sitrin, R.; Barr, E. GARDASIL®: Prophylactic Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Development—From Bench Top to Bed-Side. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 81, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhai, L.; Tumban, E. Gardasil-9: A Global Survey of Projected Efficacy. Antivir. Res. 2016, 130, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Schwarz, T.F. Clinical Update of the AS04-Adjuvanted Human Papillomavirus-16/18 Cervical Cancer Vaccine, Cervarix®. Adv. Ther. 2009, 26, 983–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zhang, X.; Wei, M.; Pan, H.; Lin, Z.; Wang, K.; Weng, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Xin, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; et al. Robust Manufacturing and Comprehensive Characterization of Recombinant Hepatitis E Virus-like Particles in Hecolin®. Vaccine 2014, 32, 4039–4050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Laurens, M.B. RTS,S/AS01 Vaccine (MosquirixTM): An Overview. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2020, 16, 480–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Pechsrichuang, P.; Namwongnao, S.; Jacquet, A. Bioengineering of Virus-like Particles for the Prevention or Treatment of Allergic Diseases. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2021, 13, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Donaldson, B.; Lateef, Z.; Walker, G.F.; Young, S.L.; Ward, V.K. Virus-like Particle Vaccines: Immunology and Formulation for Clinical Translation. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2018, 17, 833–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Engeroff, P.; Caviezel, F.; Storni, F.; Thoms, F.; Vogel, M.; Bachmann, M.F. Allergens Displayed on Virus-like Particles Are Highly Immunogenic but Fail to Activate Human Mast Cells. Allergy 2018, 73, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kratzer, B.; Hofer, S.; Zabel, M.; Pickl, W.F. All the Small Things: How Virus-like Particles and Liposomes Modulate Allergic Immune Responses. Eur. J. Immunol. 2020, 50, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Schmitz, N.; Dietmeier, K.; Bauer, M.; Maudrich, M.; Utzinger, S.; Muntwiler, S.; Saudan, P.; Bachmann, M.F. Displaying Fel D1 on Virus-like Particles Prevents Reactogenicity despite Greatly Enhanced Immunogenicity: A Novel Therapy for Cat Allergy. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 1941–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sobczak, J.M.; Krenger, P.S.; Storni, F.; Mohsen, M.O.; Balke, I.; Reseviča, G.; Heath, M.D.; Carreno Velazquez, T.L.; Kramer, M.F.; Scott, C.J.W.; et al. The next Generation Virus-like Particle Platform for the Treatment of Peanut Allergy. Allergy 2023, 78, 1980–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kratzer, B.; Köhler, C.; Hofer, S.; Smole, U.; Trapin, D.; Iturri, J.; Pum, D.; Kienzl, P.; Elbe-Bürger, A.; Gattinger, P.; et al. Prevention of Allergy by Virus-like Nanoparticles (VNP) Delivering Shielded Versions of Major Allergens in a Humanized Murine Allergy Model. Allergy 2019, 74, 246–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Thoms, F.; Haas, S.; Erhart, A.; Nett, C.S.; Rüfenacht, S.; Graf, N.; Strods, A.; Patil, G.; Leenadevi, T.; Fontaine, M.C.; et al. Immunization of Cats against Fel d 1 Results in Reduced Allergic Symptoms of Owners. Viruses 2020, 12, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sani, M.Z.; Bargahi, A.; Momenzadeh, N.; Dehghani, P.; Moghadam, M.V.; Maleki, S.J.; Nabipour, I.; Shirkani, A.; Akhtari, J.; Hesamizadeh, K.; et al. Genetically Engineered Fusion of Allergen and Viral-like Particle Induces a More Effective Allergen-Specific Immune Response than a Combination of Them. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Khaitov, M.; Shilovskiy, I.; Valenta, R.; Weber, M.; Korneev, A.; Tulaeva, I.; Gattinger, P.; Van Hage, M.; Hofer, G.; Konradsen, J.R.; et al. Recombinant PreS-fusion Protein Vaccine for Birch Pollen and Apple Allergy. Allergy 2024, 79, 1001–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ma, Y.; Halayko, A.J.; Basu, S.; Guan, Q.; Weiss, C.R.; Ma, A.G.; HayGlass, K.T.; Becker, A.B.; Warrington, R.J.; Peng, Z. Sustained Suppression of IL-13 by a Vaccine Attenuates Airway Inflammation and Remodeling in Mice. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2013, 48, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Fettelschoss-Gabriel, A.; Fettelschoss, V.; Thoms, F.; Giese, C.; Daniel, M.; Olomski, F.; Kamarachev, J.; Birkmann, K.; Bühler, M.; Kummer, M.; et al. Treating Insect-Bite Hypersensitivity in Horses with Active Vaccination against IL-5. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018, 142, 1194–1205.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Fettelschoss-Gabriel, A.; Fettelschoss, V.; Olomski, F.; Birkmann, K.; Thoms, F.; Bühler, M.; Kummer, M.; Zeltins, A.; Kündig, T.M.; Bachmann, M.F. Active Vaccination against Interleukin-5 as Long-term Treatment for Insect-bite Hypersensitivity in Horses. Allergy 2019, 74, 572–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Jonsdottir, S.; Fettelschoss, V.; Olomski, F.; Talker, S.C.; Mirkovitch, J.; Rhiner, T.; Birkmann, K.; Thoms, F.; Wagner, B.; Bachmann, M.F.; et al. Safety Profile of a Virus-Like Particle-Based Vaccine Targeting Self-Protein Interleukin-5 in Horses. Vaccines 2020, 8, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Gharailoo, Z.; Plattner, K.; Augusto, G.; Engeroff, P.; Vogel, M.; Bachmann, M.F. Generation of a Virus-like Particles Based Vaccine against IgE. Allergy 2024, 16090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Shamji, M.; Layhadi, J.; Turner, P.; Patel, N.; Parkin, R.; Oluwayi, K.; Rusyn, O.; Skinner, M.; Heath, M.; Kramer, M.; et al. Virus Like Particle (VLP) Based Peanut Allergen Immunotherapy Candidate Display A Decreased Activation And Histamine Release From CRTH2+ Basophils: A Proof of Concept Study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2022, 149, AB37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Eckl-Dorna, J.; Weber, M.; Stanek, V.; Linhart, B.; Ristl, R.; Waltl, E.E.; Villazala-Merino, S.; Hummel, A.; Focke-Tejkl, M.; Froeschel, R.; et al. Two Years of Treatment with the Recombinant Grass Pollen Allergy Vaccine BM32 Induces a Continuously Increasing Allergen-Specific IgG4 Response. EBioMedicine 2019, 50, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Gerlich, W.H. “Dual Use”: The Anti-Allergy Vaccine BM32 and Its HBV Carrier Protein. EBioMedicine 2020, 60, 102998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Asayama, K.; Kobayashi, T.; D’Alessandro-Gabazza, C.N.; Toda, M.; Yasuma, T.; Fujimoto, H.; Okano, T.; Saiki, H.; Takeshita, A.; Fujiwara, K.; et al. Protein S Protects against Allergic Bronchial Asthma by Modulating Th1/Th2 Balance. Allergy 2020, 75, 2267–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Wang, W.; Luo, X.; Zhang, Q.; He, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X. Bifidobacterium Infantis Relieves Allergic Asthma in Mice by Regulating Th1/Th2. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e920583-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Wang, Y.; Douglas, T. Bioinspired Approaches to Self-Assembly of Virus-like Particles: From Molecules to Materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 1349–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Klimek, L.; Bachmann, M.F.; Senti, G.; Kündig, T.M. Immunotherapy of Type-1 Allergies with Virus-like Particles and CpG-Motifs. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2014, 10, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Krieg, A.M. Therapeutic Potential of Toll-like Receptor 9 Activation. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 471–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Durham, S.R.; Shamji, M.H. Allergen Immunotherapy: Past, Present and Future. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2023, 23, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Senti, G.; Johansen, P.; Haug, S.; Bull, C.; Gottschaller, C.; Müller, P.; Pfister, T.; Maurer, P.; Bachmann, M.F.; Graf, N.; et al. Use of A-type CpG Oligodeoxynucleotides as an Adjuvant in Allergen-specific Immunotherapy in Humans: A Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2009, 39, 562–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Klimek, L.; Willers, J.; Hammann-Haenni, A.; Pfaar, O.; Stocker, H.; Mueller, P.; Renner, W.A.; Bachmann, M.F. Assessment of Clinical Efficacy of CYT003-QbG10 in Patients with Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis: A Phase IIb Study. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2011, 41, 1305–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Beeh, K.-M.; Kanniess, F.; Wagner, F.; Schilder, C.; Naudts, I.; Hammann-Haenni, A.; Willers, J.; Stocker, H.; Mueller, P.; Bachmann, M.F.; et al. The Novel TLR-9 Agonist QbG10 Shows Clinical Efficacy in Persistent Allergic Asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 131, 866–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Casale, T.B.; Cole, J.; Beck, E.; Vogelmeier, C.F.; Willers, J.; Lassen, C.; Hammann-Haenni, A.; Trokan, L.; Saudan, P.; Wechsler, M.E. CYT 003, a TLR 9 Agonist, in Persistent Allergic Asthma—A Randomized Placebo-controlled Phase 2b Study. Allergy 2015, 70, 1160–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Chun, P.I.F.; Lehman, H. Current and Future Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis. Clin. Rev. Allerg. Immunol. 2020, 59, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Orengo, J.M.; Radin, A.R.; Kamat, V.; Badithe, A.; Ben, L.H.; Bennett, B.L.; Zhong, S.; Birchard, D.; Limnander, A.; Rafique, A.; et al. Treating Cat Allergy with Monoclonal IgG Antibodies That Bind Allergen and Prevent IgE Engagement. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Suber, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, P.; Guo, R.; Burks, A.W.; Kulis, M.D.; Smith, S.A.; Iweala, O.I. Novel Peanut-Specific Human IgE Monoclonal Antibodies Enable Screens for Inhibitors of the Effector Phase in Food Allergy. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 974374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ma, Y.; Hayglass, K.T.; Becker, A.B.; Halayko, A.J.; Basu, S.; Simons, F.E.R.; Peng, Z. Novel Cytokine Peptide-based Vaccines: An Interleukin-4 Vaccine Suppresses Airway Allergic Responses in Mice. Allergy 2007, 62, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Zou, Y.; Sonderegger, I.; Lipowsky, G.; Jennings, G.T.; Schmitz, N.; Landi, M.; Kopf, M.; Bachmann, M.F. Combined Vaccination against IL-5 and Eotaxin Blocks Eosinophilia in Mice. Vaccine 2010, 28, 3192–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Long, Q.; Huang, W.; Yao, Y.; Yang, X.; Sun, W.; Jin, X.; Li, Y.; Chu, X.; Liu, C.; Peng, Z.; et al. Virus-like Particles Presenting Interleukin-33 Molecules: Immunization Characteristics and Potentials of Blocking IL-33/ST2 Pathway in Allergic Airway Inflammation. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2014, 10, 2303–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ryman, J.T.; Meibohm, B. Pharmacokinetics of Monoclonal Antibodies. CPT Pharmacom Syst. Pharma 2017, 6, 576–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Kueng, H.J.; Leb, V.M.; Haiderer, D.; Raposo, G.; Thery, C.; Derdak, S.V.; Schmetterer, K.G.; Neunkirchner, A.; Sillaber, C.; Seed, B.; et al. General Strategy for Decoration of Enveloped Viruses with Functionally Active Lipid-Modified Cytokines. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 8666–8676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ahmar Rauf, M.; Nisar, M.; Abdelhady, H.; Gavande, N.; Iyer, A.K. Nanomedicine Approaches to Reduce Cytokine Storms in Severe Infections. Drug Discov. Today 2022, 27, 103355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Peng, Z.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Q.; Rector, E.; Ma, Y.; Warrington, R. Novel IgE Peptide-based Vaccine Prevents the Increase of IgE and Down-regulates Elevated IgE in Rodents. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2007, 37, 1040–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Bachmann, M.F.; Jennings, G.T. Therapeutic Vaccines for Chronic Diseases: Successes and Technical Challenges. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2011, 366, 2815–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. An, M.; Raguram, A.; Du, S.W.; Banskota, S.; Davis, J.R.; Newby, G.A.; Chen, P.Z.; Palczewski, K.; Liu, D.R. Engineered Virus-like Particles for Transient Delivery of Prime Editor Ribonucleoprotein Complexes in Vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Zeltins, A. Construction and Characterization of Virus-Like Particles: A Review. Mol. Biotechnol. 2013, 53, 92–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Kundig, T.; Senti, G.; Schnetzler, G.; Wolf, C.; Prinzvavricka, B.; Fulurija, A.; Hennecke, F.; Sladko, K.; Jennings, G.; Bachmann, M. Der p 1 Peptide on Virus-like Particles Is Safe and Highly Immunogenic in Healthy Adults. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006, 117, 1470–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Kim, K.-J.; Kim, G.; Bae, J.-H.; Song, J.-J.; Kim, H.-S. A pH-Responsive Virus-Like Particle as a Protein Cage for a Targeted Delivery. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2024, 13, e2302656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zehetner, L.; Széliová, D.; Kraus, B.; Graninger, M.; Zanghellini, J.; Hernandez Bort, J.A. Optimizing VLP Production in Gene Therapy: Opportunities and Challenges for in Silico Modeling. Biotechnol. J. 2023, 18, 2200636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mobini, S.; Chizari, M.; Mafakher, L.; Rismani, E.; Rismani, E. Computational Design of a Novel VLP-Based Vaccine for Hepatitis B Virus. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. López-Sagaseta, J.; Malito, E.; Rappuoli, R.; Bottomley, M.J. Self-Assembling Protein Nanoparticles in the Design of Vaccines. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Grgacic, E.V.L.; Anderson, D.A. Virus-like Particles: Passport to Immune Recognition. Methods 2006, 40, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Bachmann, M.F.; Jennings, G.T. Vaccine Delivery: A Matter of Size, Geometry, Kinetics and Molecular Patterns. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 787–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Sabree, S.A.; Voigt, A.P.; Blackwell, S.E.; Vishwakarma, A.; Chimenti, M.S.; Salem, A.K.; Weiner, G.J. Direct and Indirect Immune Effects of CMP-001, a Virus-like Particle Containing a TLR9 Agonist. J. Immunother. Cancer 2021, 9, e002484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Lemke-Miltner, C.D.; Blackwell, S.E.; Yin, C.; Krug, A.E.; Morris, A.J.; Krieg, A.M.; Weiner, G.J. Antibody Opsonization of a TLR9 Agonist–Containing Virus-like Particle Enhances In Situ Immunization. J. Immunol. 2020, 204, 1386–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Lin, Y.-J.; Zimmermann, J.; Schülke, S. Novel Adjuvants in Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy: Where Do We Stand? Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1348305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 25 07429 g001
Figure 1. Summary of the main issues reported throughout this review: Structural classification, different production systems, the immune mechanisms associated, and the application of VLPs in the treatment of allergies. Created with BioRender.com and ChimeraX v1.17.
Figure 1. Summary of the main issues reported throughout this review: Structural classification, different production systems, the immune mechanisms associated, and the application of VLPs in the treatment of allergies. Created with BioRender.com and ChimeraX v1.17.
Ijms 25 07429 g001
Ijms 25 07429 g002
Figure 2. Schematic and modeled structural classification of VLPs. (a) According to their morphology, VLPs can be spherical or filamentous. (b) Both spherical and filamentous VLPs can be distinguished according to the structure of the assembled particle: eVLP (membrane in wheat color, glycoproteins in blue), non-eVLP (capsid in purple), or cVLP (capsid in rainbow). (c) cVLPs can be further classified according to the type of conjugation, such as chemically coupled (capsid in green, linker in red, epitope in yellow) or genetically fused (capsid in light blue, epitope in pink). Created with BioRender.com and ChimeraX v1.17.
Figure 2. Schematic and modeled structural classification of VLPs. (a) According to their morphology, VLPs can be spherical or filamentous. (b) Both spherical and filamentous VLPs can be distinguished according to the structure of the assembled particle: eVLP (membrane in wheat color, glycoproteins in blue), non-eVLP (capsid in purple), or cVLP (capsid in rainbow). (c) cVLPs can be further classified according to the type of conjugation, such as chemically coupled (capsid in green, linker in red, epitope in yellow) or genetically fused (capsid in light blue, epitope in pink). Created with BioRender.com and ChimeraX v1.17.
Ijms 25 07429 g002
Ijms 25 07429 g003
Figure 3. Proposed immune mechanisms associated with the main strategies of VLP immunotherapies against allergies. The strategies share two common mechanisms: The first is based on the recognition of the formula by the BCR of B cells and consequent antibody production. The second consists of the detection of VLPs by APCs and the following presentation to CD4+ lymphocytes, enhancing Th1 and Treg responses with a decrease in the Th2 pathway. Depending on the approach, specific mechanisms will occur: (a) TLR ligands coupled to VLP platforms will induce the secretion of class I interferons, skewing the response to a Th1-type. (b) Allergen-conjugated VLPs can trigger the production of neutralizing antibodies against the allergen itself. (c) Cytokines bound to VLPs can lead to the secretion of anti-cytokines autoantibodies. (d) VLPs combined with IgEs elicit the synthesis of anti-IgE antibodies to inhibit the function of the main allergy immunoglobulin. The main goal of these immunotherapies is the desensitization of the patient to the specific allergen and the induction of tolerance (created with BioRender.com).
Figure 3. Proposed immune mechanisms associated with the main strategies of VLP immunotherapies against allergies. The strategies share two common mechanisms: The first is based on the recognition of the formula by the BCR of B cells and consequent antibody production. The second consists of the detection of VLPs by APCs and the following presentation to CD4+ lymphocytes, enhancing Th1 and Treg responses with a decrease in the Th2 pathway. Depending on the approach, specific mechanisms will occur: (a) TLR ligands coupled to VLP platforms will induce the secretion of class I interferons, skewing the response to a Th1-type. (b) Allergen-conjugated VLPs can trigger the production of neutralizing antibodies against the allergen itself. (c) Cytokines bound to VLPs can lead to the secretion of anti-cytokines autoantibodies. (d) VLPs combined with IgEs elicit the synthesis of anti-IgE antibodies to inhibit the function of the main allergy immunoglobulin. The main goal of these immunotherapies is the desensitization of the patient to the specific allergen and the induction of tolerance (created with BioRender.com).
Ijms 25 07429 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Berreiros-Hortala, H.; Vilchez-Pinto, G.; Diaz-Perales, A.; Garrido-Arandia, M.; Tome-Amat, J. Virus-like Particles as Vaccines for Allergen-Specific Therapy: An Overview of Current Developments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7429. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137429

AMA Style

Berreiros-Hortala H, Vilchez-Pinto G, Diaz-Perales A, Garrido-Arandia M, Tome-Amat J. Virus-like Particles as Vaccines for Allergen-Specific Therapy: An Overview of Current Developments. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(13):7429. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137429

Chicago/Turabian Style

Berreiros-Hortala, Helena, Gonzalo Vilchez-Pinto, Araceli Diaz-Perales, Maria Garrido-Arandia, and Jaime Tome-Amat. 2024. "Virus-like Particles as Vaccines for Allergen-Specific Therapy: An Overview of Current Developments" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 13: 7429. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137429

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop