Next Article in Journal
The Role of Changes in the Expression of Inflammation-Associated Genes in the Variants of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease
Previous Article in Journal
High-Throughput Molecular Modeling and Evaluation of the Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Açaí Constituents against NLRP3 Inflammasome
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Brassinosteroid Analogues with 3,6 Dioxo Function, 24-Nor-22(S)-Hydroxy Side Chain and p-Substituted Benzoate Function at C-23—Synthesis and Evaluation of Plant Growth Effects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Molecular Lesions in BRI1 and Its Orthologs in the Plant Kingdom

by
Ahmad Zada
1,
Minghui Lv
2 and
Jia Li
1,2,*
1
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cell Activities and Stress Adaptations, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Adaptation and Molecular Design, School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(15), 8111; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158111
Submission received: 8 June 2024 / Revised: 15 July 2024 / Accepted: 18 July 2024 / Published: 25 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brassinosteroid (BR) Signal Transduction in Plants)

Abstract

:
Brassinosteroids (BRs) are an essential group of plant hormones regulating numerous aspects of plant growth, development, and stress responses. BRI1, along with its co-receptor BAK1, are involved in brassinosteroid sensing and early events in the BR signal transduction cascade. Mutational analysis of a particular gene is a powerful strategy for investigating its biochemical role. Molecular genetic studies, predominantly in Arabidopsis thaliana, but progressively in numerous other plants, have identified many mutants of the BRI1 gene and its orthologs to gain insight into its structure and function. So far, the plant kingdom has identified up to 40 bri1 alleles in Arabidopsis and up to 30 bri1 orthologs in different plants. These alleles exhibit phenotypes that are identical in terms of development and growth. Here, we have summarized bri1 alleles in Arabidopsis and its orthologs present in various plants including monocots and dicots. We have discussed the possible mechanism responsible for the specific allele. Finally, we have briefly debated the importance of these alleles in the research field and the agronomically valuable traits they offer to improve plant varieties.

1. Introduction

Plants contain numerous types of steroids; nevertheless, brassinosteroids (BRs) are widely distributed and have a biological impact on plant development when administered exogenously [1]. More than 70 chemical representatives of this class of phytohormones have been identified or isolated from more than 100 plant species, ranging from algae to angiosperms, indicating the widespread distribution across the plant kingdom [2]. BRs play many essential roles in a plant’s life cycle including the elongation, division, and differentiation of cells at the cellular level [3,4,5]. BRs control several aspects of the whole plant, including root meristem size [6,7], blooming period [8], male fertility [9], and stomata development [10,11,12]. BRs also play a variety of roles in both biotic and abiotic stress responses, including immunological signaling caused by pathogen-associated molecular patterns, thermotolerance, and defense against insect herbivores [5,13,14,15,16].
The brassinosteroid signaling pathway is one of the well-characterized pathways in plants that mediate response to BRs [17]. This pathway is initiated by a receptor complex that consists of the Leu-rich repeat (LRR) receptor-like kinase (RLK) BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1 (BRI1) [18] and its coreceptors from the somatic embryogenesis receptor-like kinase (SERK) family [19,20]. BRI1 belongs to a large group of serine/threonine leucine-rich repeats receptor-like kinase (S/T LRR-RLKs) exclusive to plants and has over 200 members within Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) [21]. The BRI1 protein is made up of a cytoplasmic portion that includes a juxtamembrane segment (JM), a kinase domain (KD), a C-terminal tail (CT), and a single transmembrane region, while the extracellular domain (ED) contains an N-terminal signal peptide, a leucine-zipper motif, and 25 leucine-rich repeats [18,22,23]. A sequence of amino acids with 68 residues between the 21st and 22nd LRRs is referred to as an island domain (ID), and structural and genetic analyses indicate that the island domain and the 22nd LRR have a direct role in BR binding [24,25]. The BRI1 kinase activity is inhibited in the absence of BRs by its C terminus [23] and an inhibitory protein, bri1 kinase inhibitor 1 (BKI1), through physical interaction [26].
In Arabidopsis, three potential BRI1 homologs, identified as BRI1-like 1, 2, and 3 (BRL1, BRL2, and BRL3), were found with the use of bioinformatics analysis and the activation-tagging screening for bri1 suppressors [27,28]. Additionally, BL binding studies show that BRL1 and BRL3 can bind to BL, while BRL2 does not, and BRL1 has a considerably higher binding affinity for BL than BRI1 [27]. When these homologs were expressed in Arabidopsis bri1 mutants, BRL1 and BRL3, but not BRL2, restored their phenotypes, indicating that these two proteins have a high affinity for BL interaction [27,29].
The binding of the brassinosteroid ligand causes hetero-dimerization of BRI1 and SERK family members like BRI1-ASSOCIATED RECEPTOR KINASE 1 (BAK1) [30,31], which results in extensive auto- as well as trans-phosphorylation of the intracellular BAK1 and BRI1 kinase domains [20]. After that, the CONSTITUTIVE DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH 1 (CDG1) and the BR SIGNALING KINASES (BSKs) are phosphorylated by the activated BRI1, which subsequently phosphorylates a phosphatase termed BRI1-SUPPRESSOR 1 (BSU1) [32,33,34]. Brassinosteroid insensitive 2 (BIN2), a GSK3/Shaggy-like kinase, is dephosphorylated and inhibited by phosphorylated BSU1, which also releases its inhibition on a class of transcription factors specific to plants, including bri1-EMS suppressor 1 (BES1), brassinazole resistant 1 (BZR1), and their cofactors [35,36,37,38,39,40]. Eventually, this results in the activation of transcription factors like BES1 [40] and BZR1 [39], which cause major alterations in the expression of thousands of genes downstream [39,41].
Mutants that exhibit phenotypic features distinct from isogenic wild-type plants are crucial for genetic study [42]. Up to 40 distinct bri1 alleles have been identified in Arabidopsis since the first BR-insensitive mutant was reported in 1996. The majority of these mutations are concentrated in the extracellular region’s ID or the LRRs that surround it, and the cytoplasmic region’s KD [43,44], and analyzing these mutations has improved our understanding of BRI1’s role in modulating the growth and development of plants [43]. Previous biochemical and structural analyses have revealed or implied that some bri1 mutations impact BRI1 binding to its ligand or the coreceptor BAK1 [45,46,47,48]; some inhibit BRI1’s kinase activity [23,49,50,51]; still others prohibit BRI1 from intracellular trafficking [52,53].
In the plant kingdom, BRI1 orthologs are widely distributed and have been isolated and characterized from a variety of species, comprising monocots like Brachypodium distachyon, rice (Oryza sativa), barley (Hordeum vulgare), and dicots which include tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and pea (Pisum sativum) [54]. In addition to the model plant Arabidopsis, in which up to 40 bri1 alleles have been identified alone, mutations in orthologs of BRI1 have been isolated from various plants around the plant kingdom. In rice, barley, tomato, and pea, mutations in BRI1 orthologues lead to pleiotropic phenotypes that are alike [55,56], and similarity in gene sequences, as well as mutant phenotypes, reinforces functional conservation amongst BRI1 genes in diverse species [54].

2. bri1 Alleles in Arabidopsis

Lesions in the genes encoding the hormone receptor or components of the signal transduction system are typically the cause of hormone-insensitive mutants [57,58]. It is theoretically hypothesized that mutants that are hormone-insensitive exhibit identical phenotypes as mutants that are hormone-deficient. Actually, phenotypes of BR-deficient mutants such as de-etiolated (det2) and constitutive photomorphogenesis and dwarfism (cpd) are similar to those of dwarfed bri1 mutants [59,60]; nevertheless, the primary distinction is that BRs do not reverse the dwarfism along with other growth defects of bri1 mutants. In Arabidopsis, the inhibitory effect of BR on primary root elongation was critical in identifying the bri1 mutant [61]. The recessive mutation that causes the bri1-1 phenotype occurs in a gene situated on chromosome IV [61]. The gene impaired in BR-insensitive mutants was identified and found to encode a potential membrane-bound LRR-RLK [18]. The majority of the alleles with the most severe morphological abnormalities have point mutations within the island or kinase domain [49]. To some extent, these phenotypes exhibit similar characteristics, such as dwarfism, compact, dark-green rosette leaves with short petioles, delayed senescence and flowering time, decreased male fertility, and modified skotomorphogenesis and photomorphogenesis [61,62]. To date, up to 40 unique bri1 alleles have been identified in Arabidopsis during the last three decades by several independent genetic screens (Table 1).

2.1. A BR-Insensitive Mutant Shows Multiple Defects

The first BR-insensitive mutant identified in Arabidopsis was bri1 [61]. Mutation within the BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE 1 (BRI1) locus significantly impacts plant development, suggesting that the BRI1 gene has a potential function in brassinosteroid sensing or signal transduction. The mutant was originally named brassinosteroid-insensitive 1 (bri1); later, it was renamed bri1-1. bri1-1 did not respond to BRs in root-inhibition assays, but retained sensitivity to other plant hormones such as auxin and gibberellin (GA). While Col-0 plants of the same age were taller than 15 cm, two-month-old bri1-1 plants were merely 1.5 cm tall. It is quite likely that the bri1-1 mutant is female-fertile while male-sterile. There is only one recessive Mendelian allele responsible for the bril-1 phenotype. The bri1-1 phenotype, on the other hand, was revealed to be firmly linked to the bottom of chromosome IV. The bri1-1 mutant exhibited several defects in developmental pathways that were not remedied by brassinosteroid treatment. These included a significantly reduced stature; thickened, dark-green leaves; male sterility; and decreased apical dominance. When the bri1-1 mutant was grown in the dark air, it exhibited short, thickened hypocotyls and entirely opened cotyledons, which are traits shared by the det2 and cop class of photomorphogenic mutants [76,77]. Microscopic assessment of the bri1-1 mutant suggests that reduced cell size rather than cell number is liable for the dwarfed phenotype.

2.2. Brassinosteroids Are Essential in Plant Development

A brassinosteroid-insensitive mutant called cbb2 (cabbage 2) was analyzed, which was allelic to bri1-1 [63]. Through the characterization of the mutant, the study provided convincing evidence that this class of compounds (brassinosteroids) are vital as endogenous regulators of cell elongation and play a significant role in plant growth. Extremely dwarfed mutant cbb2 was isolated by transposon mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana [78]; cbb2 mutation disturbs the perception of brassinosteroids, which are essential for properly regulating plant development. Dark-grown cbb2 seedlings exhibited characteristics similar to those seen in de-etiolated (det) [76] or constitutive photomorphogenesis (cop) plants [77] which included short hypocotyl, opened cotyledons, and the appearance of primary leaves after sustained growth in darkness. These differences were observed in comparison to wild-type plants, which developed extended hypocotyl and small, closed cotyledons in dark conditions [79]. Similar to bri1-1, the mutant seedlings’ smaller size was typically brought about by smaller cells, as opposed to fewer cells overall. Molecular genetic markers aided with the mapping of the cbb2 mutation to the basal end of the fourth chromosome.

2.3. An LRR Receptor-like Kinase Is Involved in BR Signaling Pathway

The cloning and molecular analysis of the BRI1 gene’s expression pattern in 1997 marked an important breakthrough in the field of brassinosteroid research. The BRI1 gene encodes a putative receptor-like kinase expressed everywhere in plants and is involved in the BR signaling pathway [18]. BRI1 appears as being constitutively and ubiquitously expressed in response to varying light conditions and throughout the development of Arabidopsis. In this study, 18 bri1 alleles were isolated of which 5 were sequenced and characterized. These eighteen mutations were alleles of the formerly identified BRI1/CBB2 gene [61,63], and were labeled bri1-101 to bri1-118, as these were the alleles of the bri1 locus that had previously been reported. The bri1 mutants exhibited several characteristics in the dark, including dwarfed stature, thickened hypocotyls, accumulated anthocyanin, opened and enlarged cotyledons, and developed primary leaf buds. The mutants displayed reduced male fertility and apical dominance, delay in flowering, and leaf senescence. Out of 18 alleles, 5 alleles that were sequenced, a mutation in the extracellular domain, and 4 other mutations in the cytoplasmic kinase domain abolish the in vivo activity of BRI1 (Figure 1). Four alleles with mutations in the kinase domain are grouped in a 50-amino acid stretch (amino acids 1031–1080). A premature termination caused by a nonsense mutation at codon 1059 in bri1-107 results in the deletion of 138 amino acids at the C terminus, suggesting a polypeptide lacking the final three subdomains of the kinase domain. Conserved residues have been substituted in two more alleles. In subdomain VIII, bri1-115 carries a mutation that results in aspartate instead of conserved glycine. A mutation in codon 1078 of bri1-101 causes a positively charged lysine to replace a conserved negatively charged glutamate in subdomain IX; glutamate at this position is completely conserved in plants through the LRR receptor kinase family. At codon 1031, the second residue just after the conserved DFG triplet in subdomain VII, which is involved in ATP binding, bri1-104 converts an alanine to threonine. Nonetheless, the island domain is necessary for BRI1’s function in the transduction of brassinosteroid signals. Gly-611 has been altered to a negatively charged glutamate in the severe allele bri1-113 in the island domain.

2.4. BRI1 Is Involved in BR Homeostasis

Seven more bri1 alleles, ranging from nulls to weak alleles were identified and characterized in a study that further demonstrated that brassinosteroids-insensitive dwarf mutants accumulate large quantities of BRs, and for endogenous BR levels to remain in a homeostatic state, BRI1 is necessary [64]. Based on their physical traits, these seven bri1 mutants can be classified as severe, moderate, or weak alleles (Figure 1). The severe alleles bri1-3 and bri1-4 are characterized by their small size, all main above-ground organs, dark-green color, and rare seed production. There is an association between decreased height and infertility of bri1 mutants. It is anticipated that the small deletions in bri1-3 and bri1-4 will change the BRI1 open reading frame (ORF) and produce an early stop codon that represents null alleles of bri1. A single base-pair change that resulted in an amino acid alteration was present in both the weak and intermediate alleles. These mutations were dispersed across the BRI1 gene: four of them were found in the extracellular domains, and one (bri1-8) changed a conserved residue in the cytoplasmic kinase domain. The bri1-8 intermediate variant produces more fertile and slightly bigger plants than the bri1-3 and bri1-4 alleles. The phenotype of bri1-8, however, is not as strong as would have been anticipated for a mutation in such a conserved residue, seen in numerous RLKs [18,80]. The weak group of bri1 alleles consists of four alleles; despite being shorter in stature, plants of the four weak alleles have colors similar to the wild type and are somewhat fertile, albeit not as fertile as the wild type. Gly alterations occurred in a region of the island domain between two LRRs in two different mutations (bri1-6 and bri1-7). In the island domain, Li and Chory [18] reported a mutant containing a different Gly; nevertheless, their mutant was not fertile, suggesting that it was likely a severe allele. The two remaining mutations were found in the extracellular domain: a Ser to a Phe in the first LRR following the island domain (bri1-9) and a Cys to a Tyr in the paired Cys domains found in the amino terminus of the extracellular domain (bri1-5). The first known mutations in the extracellular region of BRI1 that are not in the island domain were these two weak alleles. It is interesting to note that every missense mutation identified within the extracellular domain in this study is a weak allele, and that, with a few notable exceptions, these mutants exhibit proportionate changes in the plant’s physical characteristics. The bri1-5 mutant has wider leaves than the wild type, and their internode distance is shorter than that of other bri1 weak alleles, such as bri1-7, even though bri1-5 plants are taller than bri1-7 plants. Brassinolide, a physiologically active BR for Arabidopsis growth, accumulates in bri1 mutants. The proportion of brassinolide for the wild type (Ws-2), a weaker allele (bri1-5), and a null allele (bri1-4), was 1:22:57. Therefore, the quantity of functional BRI1 protein is correlated with the accumulation of brassinolide. The BRI1 gene is necessary for the feedback regulation of BR biosynthesis, because both a null allele and a weak allele of bri1 exhibit a significant accumulation of brassinolide, along with other intermediates.

2.5. BRI1 Is Ubiquitously Expressed

Another research study revealed the isolation and molecular characterization of five additional novel bri1 alleles and demonstrated that BRI1 is a ubiquitously expressed leucine-rich receptor involved in the BR signaling pathway via phosphorylation of Ser/Thr [49]. Out of the five alleles (Figure 1), three mutations were found in the kinase domain; bri1-1 and bri1-108 are missense alleles that change the amino acids Ala-909 to Thr and Arg-983 to Gln, respectively. All protein kinases have Ala-909 in subdomain II, while Arg-983 in subdomain VIA is conserved among potential plant LRR receptor-like kinases such as BRI1, CLV1, ERECTA, and Xa21 [18]. A non-conserved Asp to Asn mutation at codon 1,139, in a region of the protein that typically comprises negatively charged residues in protein kinases, is present in the bri1-117 allele. The importance of the BRI1 kinase domain is once again shown by these mutations. Two mutations were found in the BRI1 extracellular domain: a missense mutation in bri1-102 leads to the replacement of an Ile for Thr-750, and a nonsense mutation in bri1-114 creates a stop codon earlier within the 70-amino acid island domain. The kinase activity of both the wild-type and bri1-113 proteins is capable of autophosphorylation, while the kinase activity of bri1-101, which has a mutation in the kinase domain, is substantially decreased.

2.6. Interaction between BR and GA in Plant Development

A research investigation identified and analyzed the bri1 allele bri1-201 from gamma-mutagenized plants and subsequently highlighted the fact that two important plant hormones, BR and GA, interact with each other in plant development; nevertheless, certain such interactions are antagonistic [67]. bri1-201 is an entirely novel deletion allele of the BRI1 gene expressing the BR receptor BRI1, as determined by map-based cloning and genome sequencing [18,45,49]. The mutant displayed reduced growth at the initial stages of development, decreased apical dominance, late flowering, senescence of leaves, and male sterility. According to physiological studies, bri1-201 is not responsive to BRs. bri1-201 was discovered to have an 8-bp deletion of 22 nucleotides downstream of the start codon ATG (Figure 1), which caused a frameshift in the ORF, ending in a stop codon after 44 amino acid residues. Due to its absence of the BRI1 protein and somewhat smaller stature than bri1, bri1-201 is considered a null allele that is identical to the deletion mutant bri1-4, which displays a frameshift at 140 amino acid residues in the BRI1 open reading frame [64].

2.7. BRs Are Involved in Flowering Time in Arabidopsis

Two alleles of bri1, as strong enhancers of the autonomous mutant luminidependens (ld), were isolated and molecularly characterized in a study, which subsequently provided evidence that BRs are involved in floral timings by regulating FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) expression [8]. Both of these alleles were mapped to the BRI1 locus and were named bri1-201 and bri1-202. A mutant allele with the name bri1-201 has already been reported by Bouquin et al. [67]; hence, for convenience in this review, we renamed the mutant bri1-201 as bri1-201-1. It was revealed that the isolated alleles, bri1-201-1 and bri1-202, had point mutations that impacted the kinase and BR-binding domains, respectively (Figure 1). BR-deficient mutants and bri1 mutants displayed slightly late flowering, whereas the bas1 sob7 double mutant showed minor early flowering due to its decreased ability to metabolize BRs to their inactive forms [18,59,81,82]. The severe phenotype of the double mutants cpd ld and bri1 ld led to the observation that BR activity is necessary for floral transition to occur at the proper time.

2.8. Is the Kinase Activity of BRI1 Essential for Its Function?

Isolation and molecular characterization of a novel allele of bri1, bri1-301, shows moderate morphological phenotypes and a reduced response to BRs under normal growth conditions [70]. The conversion of Gly to Ile of codon 989 in the VIa subdomain of the kinase domain of BRI1 is due to a two-base alteration from GG to AT (Figure 1). The amino acid substitution resulted in undetectable kinase activity of bri1-301 protein, and raises questions regarding the functional necessity of BRI1 kinase activity in plant growth and development. With almost normal fertility, the mutant had mild morphological defects such as round leaves, short petioles, a longer life span, and somewhat lower plant height. The only two weak bri1 alleles known to exist that have mutations in the BRI1 kinase domain were bri1-8 and bri1-301 [64], until bri-702 was identified in 2017 [51]. Two independent studies revealed that bri1-301 is a temperature-sensitive mutant [69,71]. High temperature reduced the protein stability and biochemical activity of bri1-301, likely due to temperature-enhanced protein misfolding leading to its increased internalization and degradation [69,71]. At a lower temperature such as 18 °C, bri1-301 displays subtle morphological abnormalities, while at a higher temperature such as 28 °C, bri1-301 shows a severe phenotype resembling that of a null bri1 mutant [69]. In this study, the importance of the BRI1 kinase activity was questioned [70] because bri1-301-KD showed no kinase activity in vitro; however, Sun et al. [51] showed that bri1-301-CD possesses kinase activity for its substrate BAK1 in vivo. Zhang et al. [71] further confirmed that the bri1-301 mutant receptor exhibits weak BR-triggered phosphorylation in vivo and absolutely entails its kinase activity for the partial growth that happens in the bri1-301 mutant.

2.9. T-DNA Insertion bri1 Alleles

A unique T-DNA insertion mutant of BRI1 named salade was identified in a study that further demonstrated that T-DNA insertion mutagenesis is a powerful technique for the functional analysis of genes in plants [72]. The phenotypic similarities between the salade plants and robust loss-of-function bri1 mutants suggest that the BRI1 deletion is the primary cause of their morphologies. Several bri1 alleles had already been studied in detail, and the strong loss-of-function mutants had dwarf phenotypes that were very similar to those of the mutant salade [18,61,64]. Two T-DNAs are present in the salade genome; one is inserted 2885 bp upstream of the BRI1 start codon, and the other 749 bp upstream (Figure 1). Wild-type plants of the same age were taller than 30 cm, but two-month-old salade plants could not become higher than 2 cm. In addition to male sterility and leaf senescence, the salade plants showed delayed flowering.
Gou et al. [73] characterized a novel T-DNA insertional allele of bri1 named bri1-701 from the seeds ordered from ABRC. bri1-701 showed no full-length mRNA expression and exhibited a phenotype identical to a typical null bri1 mutant. The root and hypocotyl growth of bri1-701 was completely insensitive to BL, and it is a T-DNA insertion strong knockout allele in the extracellular LRRs of BRI1. After the isolation of bri1-701, it has been extensively used in molecular genetic studies.

2.10. Intragenic Suppressor of bri1-5

Characterization of a dominant suppressor of the dwarf phenotype of bri1-5 plants revealed that suppression is caused by a second-site mutation in BRI1, bri1-5R1 [65]. The study put forward a model in which the second point mutation bri1-R1 compensates for the abnormalities caused by protein folding in bri1-5 and restores BRI1’s accumulation, along with plasma membrane localization, to a certain level. In terms of certain features such as plant height, spacing among internodes, silique length, and number of seeds per seed pod, bri1-5R1 plants were generally intermediate between bri1-5 and Ws-2 plants. Along with the bri1-5 mutation, the first LRR (G260A, Gly87Glu) has been mutated in the sequenced bri1-5R1 plants (Figure 1). The glycine that was changed in bri1-5R1 is found in the LRRs of BRI1, as well as in other model RLKs, in a highly conserved manner. The weak mutant bri1-9, brought on by a missense mutation located in the 22nd LRR, is the only other LRR missense mutation found in BRI1 [64]. Therefore, the second mutation discovered in the LRRs of BRI1 via forward genetics is bri1-R1. bri1-5R1 plants have distinct phenotypes as a result of both enhanced cell expansion and higher cell division.

2.11. LRR Domain of BRI1 Is Necessary

A natural bri1 allele, named bri1-120 in Landsberg (Ler) background was molecularly characterized, the mutant displayed defective growth and reduced BR sensitivity [66]. This was a new allele of bri1 in the LLR region before the island domain, and the study showed that the LLR domain is necessary for the biological function of BRI1. The mutant’s phenotypic characteristics, such as its restricted growth, dark-green compact rosette leaves, and downward curling, gave an appearance that it was a weak bri1 mutant like bri1-301 [70]. Due to a nucleotide mutation (T to C) at the 1196th position, bri1-120 has phenylalanine at the 399th position in the 13th LRR, rather than serine (Figure 1). This particular LRR area is essential for normal BRI1 functioning, based on studies investigating a point mutation in the 13th LRR, which is located before the 70-amino-acid island section of the extracellular domain of BRI1.
The isolation and characterization of a loss-of-function mutant bri1-235 that carries a mutation in the less-conserved fourth LRR of the BRI1 extracellular domain in Arabidopsis provides insight into the importance of BRI1’s less-conserved LRRs [68]. The research report also demonstrates that for BRI1 folding, not just the island and 13–25th LRRs, but the initial few LRRs following the signal peptide are, likewise, crucial. According to DNA sequencing analysis, the bri1 allele, bri1-235, had a single base change from C to T in the fourth LRRs of BRI1; as a result, the 156th amino acid residue of BRI1 in the bri1-235 changed from serine to phenylalanine (Figure 1). The mutant plants were smaller than usual and had spherical leaves, short petioles, a longer life span, smaller rosettes, and roughly normal fertility in the presence of light. Two ER-retaining bri1 mutants, bri1-5 and bri1-9, have mutations in the LRR of the BRI1 extracellular domain [52,53,64]; bri1-235 is a mutant that is identical to the bri1-5 or bri1-9 mutants in terms of the mislocalization of the receptor.

2.12. Suppressors of PMEIox

Wolf et al. [75] reported the isolation of the comfortably numb1 (cnu1) mutant, in which most aspects of the PMEIox (overexpressing a pectin methylesterase—a PME inhibitor protein referred to as PMEIox) phenotype were suppressed. Genetic mapping revealed that the kinase domain of the brassinosteroid (BR) receptor BRI1 contains a mutation (G944D), which leads to the suppressor phenotype (Figure 1). The mutant allele was named bri1cnu1, and adult bri1cnu1 plants had a typical BR-deficient phenotype of moderate strength compared to published bri1 mutants.
In addition to bri1cnu1, two extragenic suppressor mutants called bri1cnu3 and bri1cnu4 strongly suppressed the macroscopic PMEIox growth phenotype in seedlings [74]. The research highlights the complex nature of plant plasma-membrane receptor function and offers an approach to distinguish between BRI1’s roles in BR signaling and its noncanonical functions. It was revealed that a mutation in bri1cnu3 caused Arg 769, which is located in the region closest to the extracellular membrane, to be exchanged for Trp (R769W), while a mutation in bri1cnu4 caused Gly 746, which is located in the final LRR repeat of the extracellular domain, to be replaced by Ser (G746S) (Figure 1). Both mutants displayed rather normal development and did not significantly differ from the wild type, in contrast to the previously found PMEIox-suppressing mutant bri1cnu1 [75]. Therefore, compared to bri1cnu1, which carries a mutation in the kinase domain, bri1cnu3, and bri1cnu4 are two weak BRI1 mutants with a modest growth phenotype, most probably because of mutations in a less-conserved extracellular region of BRI1. It is interesting to note that in a TILLING technique for acquiring additional bri1 mutants, a similar mutation described here as bri1cnu4, G746A (G2236A on a nucleic acid level), has been identified as bri1-711 [51]. Both bri1cnu4 and bri1-711 displayed moderate insensitivity to exogenous BL treatment, as well as minor growth abnormalities.

2.13. Additional bri1 Alleles via TILLING Analysis

Using the Targeted Induced Local Lesions in Genomes (TILLING) strategy, nine alleles of bri1 were isolated and characterized including four subtle, one weak, and four strong [51]. These alleles provide additional insight into the comprehension of early events in the BR signaling pathway. These mutants were named in the order of their identification, from bri1-702 to bri1-711 (Figure 1). Like bri1-5, bri1-9, and bri1-301, bri1-702 displays a weak phenotype of bri1 [64,70]. bri1-705, bri1-706, bri1-710, and bri1-711, in comparison, have even milder phenotypes than bri1-702 and were thus designated as subtle alleles. However, bri1-703, bri1-704, bri1-708, and bri1-709 exhibit severe phenotypes that are similar to bri1-701, a previously reported bri1 null allele [73]. It is interesting to note that bri1-707 and bri1-301 share a mutation in Gly-989, although they differ in the amino acid exchange. Consequently, Xu et al. [70] reported that bri1-301 has a weak bri1 phenotype, but bri1-707 does not display an obvious defective phenotype. Similarly, discrete substitutions at the same residue are present in bri1-708 and bri1-8/108-112; while bri1-708 exhibits a null bri1 phenotype, bri1-8/108-112 are intermediate bri1 mutants [64]. bri1-702, which is the only weak allele in BRI1’s activation loop, carries an alteration in Pro-1050, which is well conserved in BRI1.

3. Orthologs of bri1 Allele

3.1. lka Mutant of Garden Pea

Nomura et al. [83] observed that the garden pea (Pisum sativum) dwarf mutant lka is around a hundredfold less sensitive to brassinolide as compared to the lkb mutant, indicating that the lka lesion causes decreased sensitivity to BR. Application of exogenous BRs restored the lkb mutant, which was BR-deficient, to a normal height; it had only a minimal effect on lka plants. In dark conditions, lka plants do not display the de-etiolation traits observed in Arabidopsis mutants such as det2 and cpd. [59,60]. Later, Nomura et al. [83,84] reported that the dwarf mutant lka of garden pea is less sensitive to brassinolide, due to a point mutation in the dwarf lka pea plant’s LKA gene, a garden pea homolog of BRI1 also known as PsBRI1. The dwarfism of the lka mutant was characterized and shown to be caused by a nucleotide substitution (G1690A) in the LRR next to the N-terminus of the island domain and is projected to transform aspartic acid to D564N asparagine (Figure 2) [85]. The lka mutation appears to have a significant impact on brassinolide perception, based on its close proximity to the amino acid island in PsBRI1 and its corresponding reduction in BR sensitivity. The lka mutant displayed a limited sensitivity to brassinolide, however, because lka is not a null mutation.

3.2. cu3 Alleles of Tomato

A naturally occurring tomato dwarf mutant cu3 was discovered among seedlings of L. pimpinellifolium. Koka et al. [86] showed that this recessive, single-gene mutant exhibits numerous traits similar to the Arabidopsis BR-insensitive mutant bri1 [61], such as extreme dwarfism, curled leaves with a dark-green color, delayed development, and decreased fertility. The cu3 mutant plants exhibited sensitivity to gibberellin, abscisic acid, cytokinins, and other hormones, but were insensitive to brassinolide. Similar to bri1, cu3 is an extreme dwarf that has a maximum mass of 2.5 cm in all dimensions. Later on, the cu3 mutant was further characterized by Montoya and colleagues [87].
A dwarf mutant of tomato was observed to be partially sensitive to BL [87], and hence the mutant appeared to be different from the previously reported BR-insensitive mutant curl3 (cu3) [86]; therefore, initially, it was named altered brassinolide sensitivity1 (abs1). Using degenerate primers, the tomato counterpart of the Arabidopsis Brassinosteroid Insensitive1 Leu-rich repeat (LRR) receptor-like kinase, known as tBRI1, was identified [87]. Allelism tests revealed that cu3 and abs1 were allelic; abs1 represents a weak (intermediate) recessive allele situated at the cu3 locus, and, thus, the abs1 allele of cu3 was termed as cu3-abs or the abs1. Sequence comparison demonstrated the presence of G749Z, a nonsense mutation, in cu3 (Figure 2). A missense mutation within the kinase domain, H1012Y, has been found in the cu3-abs mutant, indicating that cu3 is a null allele and that cu3-abs might possess tBRI1 activity and potentially produce a weak allele (Figure 2). The mutant plants that carry the weak cu3-abs gene are 50% as tall as plants of the wild type, whereas cu3 mutants, on the other hand, are just 5% of the height of the wild type, and the stop codon indicates that cu3 is a null allele.

3.3. d61 Alleles of Rice

The dwarf mutant d61, which is defective within the rice BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1 (BRI1) gene expressing for OsBRI1, the BR receptor kinase, was, in fact, the first known BR-related mutant in rice (Oryza sativa) [55]. Later, a series of d61 alleles of rice were identified, carrying mutations in several domains of the OsBRI1 gene (Table 2). Loss-of-function mutations result in semi-dwarfism, erect height, BR insensitivity, and occasionally sterility. The d61 mutants exhibit varying degrees of growth defects, and an erect phenotype [55,88,89]. To date, more than ten unique d61 alleles of the OsBRI1 gene have been identified, and these mutations cause changes in various domains of the OsBRI1 protein (Figure 3). Yamamuro et al. [55] isolated and characterized the OsBRI1 gene and showed that it is quite similar to the Arabidopsis BRI1 gene throughout its length. Many domains found in Arabidopsis BRI1 are likewise present in the anticipated OsBRI1 polypeptide; Li and Chory [18] discussed the functions of these domains. These consist of a putative signal peptide, two cysteine pairs that are spaced conservatively, a transmembrane domain (TM), a leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) domain, and a kinase domain (KD). OsBRI1 lacks three LRR domains, which corresponds to the third-to-fifth Arabidopsis BRI1 repeats when compared to the BRI1 sequence.
The phenotypical and molecular characterization of two rice dwarf mutants, d61-1 and d61-2, revealed that dwarf mutants were caused by alleles from a single locus that remained less sensitive to BR compared to the wild-type [55]. Initially, these were classified as two distinct mutants, due to the significantly shorter culm of d61-2 compared to d61-1. Furthermore, d61-1 displays the internode elongation pattern of the dm-type, while d61-2 displays the d6-type [91]. The lack of function of the Arabidopsis BRI1 gene’s rice counterpart results in the d61 mutation. A single nucleotide mutation (C to T in d61-1 and G to A in d61-2) at distinct positions may be found in each mutant allele when comparing the OsBRI1 sequences of the wild type and the d61-1 and d61-2 mutants. In the kinase domain of OsBRI1 at residue 989, threonine changes to isoleucine as a result of the d61-1 mutation. There is a change of valine to methionine at residue 491 of the 17th LRR in the d61-2 just before the 70-amino-acid island domain.
In addition to the previously identified spontaneous mutants d61-1 and d61-2, Nakamura et al. [89] isolated eight additional alleles, including null mutations, of the OsBRI1. These ten mutations were identified in four different domains: the transmembrane domain (one allele), the kinase domain (three alleles), the 70-amino-acid island (ID; two alleles), and the leucine-rich repeats (LRRs; four alleles). The single nucleotide substitutions in the mutants d61-4 and d61-6 resulted in a stop codon at Glu-847 and a 2-bp insertion at Asp-759, which caused a frameshift, respectively. It was therefore predicted that these mutants might have displayed the most severe phenotypes and that they would have lost OsBRI1 function. The alleles responsible for single nucleotide variations at LRR, d61-3, d61-5, d61-7, and d61-2 exhibited variable degrees of phenotypic severity. Two severe alleles, d61-3 and d61-5, were anticipated to have amino acid alterations that would disrupt either the secondary structure, the tertiary structure, or both, of the LRR, and severely affect its function. A Val residue that was replaced with a Met one in the LRR directly in front of the ID was linked to the intermediate phenotype d61-2. In ID, the mutations that caused d61-8 and d61-9 were situated at Gly-522 and Gly-539, respectively; even though ID has been linked to BR binding, none of the mutants showed a severe phenotype. The Arabidopsis bri1 mutation bri1-113, whose mutation location coincides with that of d61-9, gives a severe phenotype [18]. The phenotypic intensity of the bri1 mutant in Arabidopsis is correlated with its ecotype [27]. Hence, the severity bri1-113 mutant of the Arabidopsis might be influenced by its ecotype. While BRI1 function should require kinase activity, nevertheless, amino acid substitutions of mutant d61-10 and d61-1 within the kinase domain did not result in major defects in BRI1 function. This is likely because the kinase activity of BRI1 was not affected by the amino acid exchanges and it is believed that these amino acid residues have no significance for kinase activity [22,23]. Despite having normal pattern development and differentiation, the most severe mutant, d61-4, displayed extreme dwarfism and twisted leaves. Cell-elongation defects and cell-division disruptions following cell-fate determination were the primary causes of this severe shoot phenotype. The d61-4 mutant exhibited a modest root phenotype in contrast to its severe shoot phenotype. Morinaka et al. [88] selected d61-7 out of these d61 alleles of OsBRI1, due to agronomically useful traits such as semi-dwarf stature, erect leaves, and elongated neck internodes for further analysis of grain production in paddy fields, which will be discussed in the later section.
Molecular characterization of classic rice mutant Fn189 with a semi-dwarf stature and erect leaves [90], revealed that the mutant had the same defective phenotype as the BR-deficient d2 or BR-insensitive d61 mutants [55,92]. The study showed that for brassinosteroids to maintain normal plant growth and development in rice, OsBRI1 kinase activity is necessary. Compared to wild-type seedlings, Fn189 mutant seedlings showed reduced sensitivity to exogenous BL. Sequencing analysis showed that Fn189 is a novel allelic mutant of D61, and found that the 2500th base within the coding area of D61 was altered from A to T. In the kinase domain of OsBRI1, this mutation resulted in the 834th amino acid being changed from isoleucine (I) to phenylalanine (F). Since the mutant residue I834 in Fn189 is highly conserved across BRI1-related proteins, the OsBRI1 mutant’s kinase domain I834F substitution significantly reduced OsBRI1’s kinase activity. Phenylalanine is an aromatic amino acid with fairly different physical and chemical properties, replacing isoleucine, which may lead to conformational changes in the kinase domain, resulting in its reduced activity.

3.4. uzu Alleles of Barley

With the use of forward and reverse genetics, several uzu1 alleles of the BRI1 homologous gene, HvBRI1, have been determined in barley (Hordeum vulgare) [93,94,95]. After cloning the HvBRI1 gene, Chono et al. [93] demonstrated that the putative HvBRI1 polypeptide had a conserved signal peptide, an LRR domain with a 70-amino-acid island, a transmembrane domain, and a kinase domain, which are conserved among BRI1 homologs. There are 22 tandem copies of LRR in the LRR domain, and the copy number of LRR in HvBRI1 is similar to that of the homolog of rice BRI1. In contrast to the homologs of Arabidopsis, tomato, and pea, the rice and barley BRI1 homologs lack three copies of LRR. The mutations are localized in various fragments of the intronless gene and induce the substitution of amino acid residues positioned in distinct functional domains of the encoded BR receptor (Figure 4) [94].
A semi-dwarf barley that has the “uzu” gene, known as “uzu” barley in Japan, was found not to show any response to exogenously applied BL [93]. To verify if uzu barley possesses the mutation(s) within the barley BRI1 gene (named HvBRI1), the homolog BRI1 segment with 3558-bp was isolated from both normal and uzu barley, and was sequenced. A single nucleotide alteration (A-2612 to G-2612) is associated with the uzu phenotype, according to a comparison of the HvBRI1 sequences in uzu and normal-barley varieties. In subdomain IV of the kinase domain, the alteration in uzu barley causes the conversion of His (CAC) to Arg (CGC) at position 857. The uzu dark-grown seedling did not exhibit a true de-etiolated phenotype in the dark and is not a typical de-etiolated mutant like BR-deficient dumpy [86]. There is uniformity in the accumulation pattern of BR in uzu and other BR-insensitive mutants [55,64,83,87]. The agronomical importance of the dwarf uzu allele will be discussed in the later section.
The phenotype of brassinosteroid-insensitive, semi-dwarf barley mutant 093AR, which originated from European spring barley, was allelic to the natural mutant uzu, and it contains an alteration in the HvBRI1 gene [95]. The phenotype of the mutant 093AR is caused by double substitutions CC>AA found in the HvBRI1 gene, which induces the mutation of highly conserved threonine-573. The substitution of a basic lysine for the hydrophilic threonine-573 could cause the polypeptide to alter in conformation and, consequently, affect its catalytic effectiveness. Despite having amino acid substitutions in different HvBRI1 receptor domains, the barley mutants uzu and 093AR are fully fertile and exhibit very similar phenotypes, including reduced plant height, lack of enhanced seedling elongation during dark-adapted growth, and lack of response to varying concentrations of exogenously employed BL.
Additional alleles of the barley BRI1 gene HvBRI1 were isolated and characterized [94]. Sequence analysis of HvBRI1 showed mutations in uzu1.256 (A1733T) and uzu1.b/ert ii.79 (C1760A and C1761A). The region coding the steroid-interaction island domain contains the amino acid residues that are obstructed by the alterations in uzu1.256 (Arg-564 to Trp) and uzu1.b (Thr-573 to Lys). The steroid binding and the overall location of the brassinosteroid binding site may be impacted by the charged Lys-573 that surrounds the hydrophobic active site and destroys charge neutrality. The C lobe of the N-terminal cap contains the amino acid substitution (Phe-53 to Ser) that was found in uzu1.297 [25]. BRI1 may be retained in the endoplasmic reticulum due to structural instability caused by Ser-53 substitution [53]. The substitution of the nonpolar Val-282 residue for the negatively charged Asp in uzu1.301 leads to the creation of a salt bridge among Asp-282 and Lys-302, which may disrupt the folded protein structure due to Lys-302’s loss of solvation energy [96]. An additional novel HvBRI1 allele is uzu1.c, a single-nucleotide G2171A mutation that generates a weak brassinosteroid phenotype by substituting Lys for the semi-conserved Arg-710 within proximity of the BRI1 transmembrane binding domain.
The molecular cloning and fine-mapping of a semi-dwarf gene derived from the Chinese cultivar ‘TX9425’, in two-row barley revealed the same mutation as uzu barley [97]. Some traits common to so-called uzu barley are displayed by the two-rowed dwarf barley landrace ‘TX9425,’ including the distinctive elongation of coleoptiles, leaves, culms, rachis internodes, awns, glumes, and kernels. The tall and dwarf NILs (near-isogenic lines) had identical HvBRI1 sequences according to sequence comparisons, except the semi-dwarf allele had a single nucleotide substitution (A-2612 to G-2612), which resulted in the amino acid exchange of His (CAC) to Arg (CGC), as has been recorded for the uzu variant in six-rowed barley [93].
Recently, two mutations were identified, using the TILLING approach, within HvBRI1, the barley homolog of the Arabidopsis BRI1 gene [98]. Two mutant lines that carry different mutations in the kinase of the HvBRI1 protein are M6649, which has the serine to asparagine (S1098N), and M6945, which has arginine to lysine (R953K), substitution, respectively. The homozygous mutants of both lines exhibited a considerable reduction in plant height and spike length when compared to the wild-type HTX. In addition, M6649 had fewer grains per spike than M6945, which was more comparable to the wild variety because of that trait. The production of semi-dwarf barley varieties will benefit from the addition of these mutants to the current genetic resources.

3.5. Bd21 Allele of Brachypodium

A mutant Bd21 line (BdAA900) was discovered in the Brachy-TAG collection that had a T-DNA insertion in the Brachypodium distachyon gene called Bradi2g48280 [99]. It is strongly suggested that Bradi2g48280 is a BRI1 homolog, since the expected Bradi2g48280 polypeptide shares 90% amino-acid homology with the barley BRI1 protein and 84% with the D61 rice receptor. A severe dwarf and twisted plant phenotype was displayed by the T-DNA insert, indicating the existence of a single T-DNA locus. When compared to wild-type plants, mutant plants were found to be considerably less responsive to the application of brassinosteroid using a leaf-unrolling assay.

3.6. mtbri1 Alleles of M. truncatula

Three independent Tnt1 insertion mutant lines were isolated and molecularly characterized in the Medicago truncatula Tnt1 insertion mutant population named mtbri1-1, mtbri1-2, and mtbri1-3 of MtBRI1gene [54]. According to sequence alignment, Tnt1 inserts in the three mutants at positions 709, 15, and 468 bp downstream of the initiation codon, respectively (Figure 2). MtBRI1 mutations disrupt the BR signaling system, resulting in developmentally abnormal phenotypes that are characteristics of bri1 mutants. Despite the varied sites of Tnt1 inserts in MtBRI1, mtbri1 mutant alleles exhibit identical defective phenotypes, including acute dwarfism, compact shoots with curled dark-green leaves, shortened petioles and leaf blades, and reduced lateral roots. The mtbri1 seedlings that grew in the dark display characteristic photomorphogenesis, displaying short hypocotyls and open cotyledons. Furthermore, in contrast to pink nodules in wild-type plants, nodules in mtbri1 mutants are smaller and primarily white, and are deficient in nitrogen fixation, representing a novel observation in bri1 mutants. In pea, there is no change in nodule size or nitrogen fixation activity among the wild-type variety and BR response mutant lka [83].

3.7. E29 Allele of Pepper

A dwarf pepper mutant, E29, which is weakly insensitive to BR, was isolated from EMS mutagenesis screening of the pepper-inbred line 64 [100]. The E29 mutant displayed a short-statured, compact plant with wide, thick, dark-green leaves. The stems’ histological longitudinal sections showed that, in E29, the cell width had increased but the cell length had decreased. When comparing E29 to 6421, there was a 74.7% decrease in the fruit production per plant, due to a reduction in the number of flowers. Only one recessive gene produced the mutant phenotype, and inside the kinase domain of CaBRI1 there was an allelic mutation. An amino acid at position 1157 (Pro1157Ser) of CaBRI1 changed from proline to serine as a result of the C-to-T mutation (Figure 2). Because Pro1157Ser is highly conserved amongst homologous proteins in the kinase domain, a mutation in CaBRI1 reduced its kinase activity. BAK1 cannot be activated by kinase-dead BRI1 and, as a result, the BR signal cannot be transmitted downstream [23,101]. The level of BL in the E29 mutant was significantly higher than that of 6421 (3.0-fold) similar to the high levels of BL that were recorded in Arabidopsis mutants bri1-4, bri1-5, bri1-6 [64] and the pea mutant lka [83,84].

4. Biological Uses of bri1 Alleles and Its Orthologs

bri1 and its orthologs offered some valuable unique features. Weak bri1 alleles are excellent genetic tools that have been extensively employed to investigate the role of brassinosteroid and its receptor BRI1 in plant growth and development. These mutants also aided in the discovery of many key proteins of the BR signaling pathway. Its orthologs in the plant kingdom have offered agronomically valuable traits that have been used to develop better plant varieties (Figure 5).

4.1. bri1 Alleles as a Genetic Tool

The use of many of the early identified bri1 alleles in large-scale genetic transformation experiments is limited, since they are strong alleles with significantly lower male fertility [51]. Conversely, fertile weak bri1 alleles, like bri1-5 and bri1-9, are powerful genetic tools employed for exploring the complete BR signaling pathway through extragenic modifier screens [64]. Our understanding of the BR signaling cascade, from BR perception to downstream responding-gene regulation, has greatly benefited from identifying the essential regulatory components using weak bri1 mutants [51]. For instance, activation-tagging genetic screens employing bri1-5 as background revealed several important elements controlling BR signal transduction or BR homeostasis, such as BRS1 [102], BAK1 [30], and BSU1 [32], BRL1 [28], BEN1 [103], and TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR1 (TCP1) [104]. The Dof-type transcription factor COG1 is an activation-tagged genetic modulator of bri1-5 that controls BR biosynthesis by upregulating PHYTOCHROMEINTERACTING FACTOR 4 and 5 (PIF4 and PIF5) transcription [105]. From ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)-mutagenized bri1-9, a suppressor screen was carried out to isolate EBS1 to EBS7, a group of functionally associated proteins controlling endoplasmic reticulum (ER) quality regulation [52,106,107,108]. Using an EMS-mutagenized bri1-119 library, a suppressor screen was used to identify BES1, a crucial downstream transcription factor involved in the BR signaling pathway [40]. Since its identification and characterization, bri1-301 has been frequently used as a genetic tool and an additional weak bri1 allele. Two families of atypical bHLH proteins, i.e., ATBS, and AIF1, capable of controlling BR signaling, were identified via activation-tagging the genetic suppressor of bri1-301 [109].

4.2. Dwarfism: An Important Trait for Agriculture

One of the most important characteristics of crop breeding is dwarfism. High-yielding semi-dwarf rice (Oryza sativa) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars, along with heavy-nitrogen fertilizer applications, were the key factors that made the Green Revolution possible [110]. Dwarf mutants are highly significant in many plant species and have been extensively studied because of their agronomic significance. Gibberellin (GA), a phytohormone, is one of the key elements linked to the dwarf phenotype. It is worth noting that two Green Revolution genes from rice semidwarf1 (sd1) and wheat Reduced height1 (Rht1) are associated with GA biosynthesis and signaling, respectively [111,112,113].
In contemporary crops like barley, the fourth most abundant cereal in terms of area and cultivated tonnage, mutant-based breeding approaches for optimizing brassinosteroid metabolism and signaling pathways might enhance lodging behavior [114]. Barley was shown to be a key crop for creating high-yielding semi-dwarf varieties. Since the uzu gene showed lodging resistance in semi-dwarf barley accessions, the uzu gene has been inserted into all hull-less barley grown in Japan [115]. The missense mutation of HvBRI, a counterpart of Arabidopsis BRI1, is the cause of the uzu phenotype, which is brassinosteroid-insensitive [93,115,116]. This demonstrates that a BR-related mutation is a viable target for generating high-yielding semi-dwarf cultivars. The uzu allele has been cultivated for more than a century in East Asia and is currently found in winter barley varieties in Japan, the Korean peninsula, and China [115]. Its agronomic significance arises from the sturdy and short culm that offers resistance to lodging and an erect plant architecture that can withstand dense planting. Despite the long history of uzu mutation in barley breeding, it was only found in winter barley varieties in Northeast Asia [115]. The uzu allele is sensitive to high temperatures, which may be the reason this haplotype did not spread around the globe during the era of the Green Revolution. For culm-length regulation in barley breeding, additional alleles of HvBRI1, particularly uzu1.256 with its milder phenotype and lack of uzu’s strong temperature sensitivity, could be taken into consideration as a more reliable alternative [94]. The semi-dwarf phenotype of the 093AR mutant, which is a result of a mutation in the HvBRI1 gene, was not accompanied by a decrease in fertility or seed output obtained from the European spring barley germplasm. When given large doses of fertilizer, semi-dwarf varieties of cereal are more resilient to lodging under unfavorable conditions; hence, the mutant may be the foundation of semi-dwarfism for barley breeding [95]. Two-rowed Chinese landrace ‘TX9425′, containing a mutation the same as the semi-dwarf uzu gene in six-rowed barleys, showed agronomically valuable traits that provide diagnostic markers for the selection of genes for semi-dwarf stature in barley breeding programs [97].
Morinaka et al. [88] picked the d61-7 line of dwarf rice, which has a unique d61 allele. Because of its agronomically advantageous characteristics, such as semi-dwarf stature, upright leaves, and elongated neck internodes, it has been chosen for further analysis into grain production in rice fields. The d61 mutant’s erect-leaf phenotype may be used to create rice varieties that yield effectively at high planting densities, as seen by the enhanced grain production of d61-7 in field trials, even at high densities. The tiny grain of d61-7, however, counters the rise in agricultural productivity; for example, at high planting density, the weak mutant allele d61-7 increases biomass by 35% relative to the wild type, but due to the small grain size of d61-7, there is no change in grain yield.
Recently, a new allele E29 of the height-regulating gene CaBRI1 was obtained by EMS mutagenesis of the pepper inbred line 6421. This variant has theoretical and practical implications for plant breeding suitable for facility cultivation and controlled pepper-variety harvesting [100], which makes it an excellent parent material when generating new dwarf cultivars.

4.3. Pathogen Resistance

Plants are exposed to a variety of pathogens in their natural habitat, and pathogens can substantially affect plant growth; in response, plants have developed many mechanisms to combat these pathogens. BRs are actively involved in responses to diverse pathogen attacks including viruses, bacteria, fungi, and nematodes [117]. The impact of BRI1 mutations on disease resistance to a range of pathogens has not been studied to a great extent; however, the uzu allele of barley resistance to a variety of pathogens is well documented. Because the HvBRI1 mutation increased resistance to a wide variety of harmful microbes, despite heterogeneity in their infection and virulence methods, BR signaling functions antagonistically with basal defense systems [56].
The BRI1 mutation alleviated disease induced by M. oryzae in both Brachypodium distachyon and barley. [56]. Disruption of the BR signaling system has been associated with reduced tolerance to abiotic stress, yet the lack of a biotroph–necrotroph trade-off in both B. distachyon and barley bri1 lines shows that introducing this mutation may be beneficial in plant breeding. Increased resistance to hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic fungal infections with a brief biotrophic phase results from decreased BR sensitivity. The BRI1 mutation in barley does not suffer disease resistance, in contrast to the Rht and Sln1 GA-insensitive alleles [56]. The barley uzu mutation showed increased resistance to various diseases: eyespot disease of stems caused by Oculimacula spp.; take-all of roots triggered by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici; and crown rot disease within the stem caused by Fusarium fungus [56,118].
With the help of genetic techniques, Chen and colleagues [118] discovered that barley uzu (Hvbri1) lines exhibit greater resistance to fusarium crown rot (FCR) than their tall counterparts, suggesting that decreased BR signaling amplifies resistance to Fusarium spp. Ali et al. [119] employed a blend of transcriptome and biochemical analyses to ascertain the defense-related differences between uzu derivatives and their parent barley genotypes. Comparing uzu derivatives to their parental lines, they demonstrated greater resistance against the obligate pathogen Barley Stripe Mosaic Virus (BSMV), the necrotrophic net blotch pathogen Pyrenophora teres, and the toxic hemibiotrophic fungus Fusarium culmorum, which causes Fusarium head blight (FHB, also referred to as scab disease of cereals). An unknown pathway may be responsible for the pleiotropic effects of BRI1 in the uzu resistance.

4.4. Stress Tolerance

BRs are shown to play a major role in plant responses to stresses such as cold and drought [120], which are two major issues to be addressed due to climate change. Designing and breeding stress-tolerant agricultural cultivars should be the main goal in contemporary breeding efforts, considering the current variations in the climate [121,122].

4.4.1. Drought

Drought stress was applied to some of the semi-dwarf HvBRI1 gene mutants, such as the uzu1.a mutant. When compared to the wild-type cultivar, the semi-dwarf BR mutants showed delayed wilting in response to drought stress [123]. To clarify the effect of BR signaling disruptions on the build-up of non-enzymatic antioxidants in both control and drought conditions, the semi-dwarf mutants of the HvBRI1 gene were examined. Remarkably, the glutathione accumulation study showed that the BR-insensitive mutants had far smaller amounts of this antioxidant under control circumstances as compared to the BR-biosynthesis mutants and the wild-type cultivar. Consequently, it was concluded that for normal accumulation of glutathione, BR sensitivity is essential in barley [124].

4.4.2. Cold

A significant risk to plant growth and development, as well as effects on plant distribution and crop yield, is posed by cold stress. Kim et al. [125] reported that bri1 mutants insensitive to brassinosteroids are more resilient to cold stress compared to the wild type. bri1 mutants are reported to accumulate larger quantities of BRs in the cell [64], and bri1-9 which is deficient in BR signaling, leading to dwarfism, has a stronger resilience to cold compared to the wild-type, whereas BRI1- overexpressing transgenic plants are far more sensitive to cold. Compared to either wild-type or BRI1-overexpressing plants, bri1-9 showed higher levels of endogenous expression of a combination of stress-inducible genes and genes expressing transcription factors that promote the function of stress-inducible genes. Even with the lack of a pathogen attack or environmental challenges, disease-resistant genes specific for numerous pathogens and genes expressing proteins for abiotic conditions were elevated in the bri1-9 mutant. This gives agriculture-based important information on how much endogenous growth retardation is acceptable to compensate for decreased growth associated with adverse environmental circumstances.
The isolation of mutants possessing favorable phenotypic features (e.g., semi-dwarfism, erect stature) in modern agricultural operations are needed. In certain situations, these characteristics also increase resistance to environmental challenges, making high-density planting possible [126]. Given the continued effects of global climate change, creating such grain cultivars appear to be especially crucial [126].

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Genetic strategies like mutant screens identified several essential players in BR production and signaling and illustrated the significance of BRs in plant growth [127]. The present understanding of the BR signaling system has been substantially improved by the bri1 alleles. bri1 alleles are excellent genetic tools that can be used to discover more components of the BR signaling pathway and fill in the gaps in brassinosteroids’ crosstalk with other phytohormones. One of the well-studied hormone receptors in plants is BRI1; however, bri1 alleles may be very helpful in examining it to learn more about its functions in plant development, growth, and stress-related responses.
To date, in addition to the model plant Arabidopsis, the BR signaling pathway has been explored to a somewhat greater extent in rice [128]; nevertheless, knowledge of the mechanism of BR signaling in important cereal crops is still limited. Consequently, bri1 allele orthologs in respective plants can be valuable as genetic resources to uncover further elements of the BR signaling pathway in numerous significant cereal crops. Furthermore, identification and mutational analysis of BR signaling components in these agronomically valuable cereal crops could help to produce semi-dwarf phenotypes with the desired qualities to be produced in high densities.
The plant yield of barley has been successfully increased by the BR-related uzu mutant [94]. This is an illustration of a chosen genetic variety that has only slightly modified the stature of the plant, but that modification has proven to be advantageous for both productivity and environmental adaption. Even more encouraging is the fact that uzu barley also showed improved pathogen resistance [119]. Modern genome techniques, such as genome editing and molecular breeding, have made it possible to purposely introduce these mutations into a range of plants to create improved agronomic varieties. These revelations can provide crucial understanding and insights to design strategies for producing crops with improved attributes.
Climate change is one of the core issues faced by the human population around the globe. The production and distribution of a particular crop may be affected by modifications to its growth environment brought about by climate change. Scientists are under demand to create crop varieties that can withstand extreme weather due to climate change; bri1 orthologs might serve as the ideal genetic resource to create such crop varieties.
Recently, there has been a rapid development of single-cell sequencing techniques for examining the complex environment of individual cells. These technologies can be used to study the BR signaling pathway in the model plant Arabidopsis and other important crops to obtain pieces of information for the development of improved plant varieties.

Author Contributions

A.Z. prepared the draft; M.L. contributed to the preparation of tables and figures; J.L. revised and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors’ research group is currently supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 32030005 to J.L.).

Acknowledgments

Due to the limitation of space, we apologize to the authors whose papers are not cited in this review article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mitchell, J.W.; Mandava, N.; Worley, J.F.; Plimmer, J.R.; Smith, M.V. Brassins—A New Family of Plant Hormones from Rape Pollen. Nature 1970, 225, 1065–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zullo, M.A.T.; Adam, G. Brassinosteroid Phytohormones—Structure, Bioactivity and Applications. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2002, 14, 143–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Clouse, S.D.; Sasse, J.M. BRASSINOSTEROIDS: Essential Regulators of Plant Growth and Development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 49, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhiponova, M.K.; Vanhoutte, I.; Boudolf, V.; Betti, C.; Dhondt, S.; Coppens, F.; Mylle, E.; Maes, S.; González-García, M.; Caño-Delgado, A.I.; et al. Brassinosteroid production and signaling differentially control cell division and expansion in the leaf. New Phytol. 2012, 197, 490–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, D.; Baldwin, I.T.; Wu, J. Silencing Brassinosteroid Receptor BRI1 Impairs Herbivory-elicited Accumulation of Jasmonic Acid-isoleucine and Diterpene Glycosides, but not Jasmonic Acid and Trypsin Proteinase Inhibitors in Nicotiana attenuata. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55, 514–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. González-García, M.-P.; Vilarrasa-Blasi, J.; Zhiponova, M.; Divol, F.; Mora-García, S.; Russinova, E.; Caño-Delgado, A.I. Brassinosteroids control meristem size by promoting cell cycle progression in Arabidopsis roots. Development 2011, 138, 849–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hacham, Y.; Holland, N.; Butterfield, C.; Ubeda-Tomas, S.; Bennett, M.J.; Chory, J.; Savaldi-Goldstein, S. Brassinosteroid perception in the epidermis controls root meristem size. Development 2011, 138, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Domagalska, M.A.; Schomburg, F.M.; Amasino, R.M.; Vierstra, R.D.; Nagy, F.; Davis, S.J. Attenuation of brassinosteroid signaling enhances FLC expression and delays flowering. Development 2007, 134, 2841–2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ye, Q.; Zhu, W.; Li, L.; Zhang, S.; Yin, Y.; Ma, H.; Wang, X. Brassinosteroids control male fertility by regulating the expression of key genes involved in Arabidopsis anther and pollen development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 6100–6105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gudesblat, G.E.; Schneider-Pizoń, J.; Betti, C.; Mayerhofer, J.; Vanhoutte, I.; van Dongen, W.; Boeren, S.; Zhiponova, M.; de Vries, S.; Jonak, C.; et al. SPEECHLESS integrates brassinosteroid and stomata signalling pathways. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, T.-W.; Michniewicz, M.; Bergmann, D.C.; Wang, Z.-Y. Brassinosteroid regulates stomatal development by GSK3-mediated inhibition of a MAPK pathway. Nature 2012, 482, 419–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khan, M.; Rozhon, W.; Bigeard, J.; Pflieger, D.; Husar, S.; Pitzschke, A.; Teige, M.; Jonak, C.; Hirt, H.; Poppenberger, B. Brassinosteroid-regulated GSK3/Shaggy-like Kinases Phosphorylate Mitogen-activated Protein (MAP) Kinase Kinases, Which Control Stomata Development in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 7519–7527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Krishna, P. Brassinosteroid-Mediated Stress Responses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2003, 22, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, S.; Cai, Z.; Wang, X. The primary signaling outputs of brassinosteroids are regulated by abscisic acid signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 4543–4548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Albrecht, C.; Boutrot, F.; Segonzac, C.; Schwessinger, B.; Gimenez-Ibanez, S.; Chinchilla, D.; Rathjen, J.P.; de Vries, S.C.; Zipfel, C. Brassinosteroids inhibit pathogen-associated molecular pattern–triggered immune signaling independent of the receptor kinase BAK1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 109, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Belkhadir, Y.; Jaillais, Y.; Epple, P.; Balsemão-Pires, E.; Dangl, J.L.; Chory, J. Brassinosteroids modulate the efficiency of plant immune responses to microbe-associated molecular patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 109, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Singh, A.P.; Savaldi-Goldstein, S. Growth control: Brassinosteroid activity gets context. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 1123–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, J.; Chory, J. A Putative Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor Kinase Involved in Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction. Cell 1997, 90, 929–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, X.; Xu, G.; He, P.; Shan, L. SERKing Coreceptors for Receptors. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 1017–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hohmann, U.; Lau, K.; Hothorn, M. The Structural Basis of Ligand Perception and Signal Activation by Receptor Kinases. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2017, 68, 109–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shiu, S.-H.; Bleecker, A.B. Plant Receptor-Like Kinase Gene Family: Diversity, Function, and Signaling. Sci. STKE 2001, 2001, re22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Oh, M.-H.; Ray, W.K.; Huber, S.C.; Asara, J.M.; Gage, D.A.; Clouse, S.D. Recombinant Brassinosteroid Insensitive 1 Receptor-Like Kinase Autophosphorylates on Serine and Threonine Residues and Phosphorylates a Conserved Peptide Motif in Vitro. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 751–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Meisenhelder, J.; Hunter, T.; Yoshida, S.; Asami, T.; Chory, J. Autoregulation and Homodimerization Are Involved in the Activation of the Plant Steroid Receptor BRI1. Dev. Cell 2005, 8, 855–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. She, J.; Han, Z.; Kim, T.-W.; Wang, J.; Cheng, W.; Chang, J.; Shi, S.; Wang, J.; Yang, M.; Wang, Z.-Y.; et al. Structural insight into brassinosteroid perception by BRI1. Nature 2011, 474, 472–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hothorn, M.; Belkhadir, Y.; Dreux, M.; Dabi, T.; Noel, J.P.; Wilson, I.A.; Chory, J. Structural basis of steroid hormone perception by the receptor kinase BRI1. Nature 2011, 474, 467–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, X.; Chory, J. Brassinosteroids Regulate Dissociation of BKI1, a Negative Regulator of BRI1 Signaling, from the Plasma Membrane. Science 2006, 313, 1118–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Caño-Delgado, A.; Yin, Y.; Yu, C.; Vafeados, D.; Mora-Garcìa, S.; Cheng, J.-C.; Nam, K.H.; Li, J.; Chory, J. BRL1 and BRL3 are novel brassinosteroid receptors that function in vascular differentiation in Arabidopsis. Development 2004, 131, 5341–5351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhou, A.; Wang, H.; Walker, J.C.; Li, J. BRL1, a leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinase, is functionally redundant with BRI1 in regulating Arabidopsis brassinosteroid signaling. Plant J. 2004, 40, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kinoshita, T.; Canodelgado, A.I.; Seto, H.; Hiranuma, S.; Fujioka, S.; Yoshida, S.; Chory, J. Binding of brassinosteroids to the extracellular domain of plant receptor kinase BRI1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 433, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, J.; Wen, J.; A Lease, K.; Doke, J.T.; E Tax, F.; Walker, J.C. BAK1, an Arabidopsis LRR Receptor-like Protein Kinase, Interacts with BRI1 and Modulates Brassinosteroid Signaling. Cell 2002, 110, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nam, K.H.; Li, J. BRI1/BAK1, a Receptor Kinase Pair Mediating Brassinosteroid Signaling. Cell 2002, 110, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mora-García, S.; Vert, G.; Yin, Y.; Caño-Delgado, A.; Cheong, H.; Chory, J. Nuclear protein phosphatases with Kelch-repeat domains modulate the response to brassinosteroids in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tang, W.; Kim, T.-W.; Oses-Prieto, J.A.; Sun, Y.; Deng, Z.; Zhu, S.; Wang, R.; Burlingame, A.L.; Wang, Z.-Y. Brassinosteroid-Signaling Kinases (BSKs) Mediate Signal Transduction from the Receptor Kinase BRI1 in Arabidopsis NIH Public Access. Science 2008, 321, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kim, T.-W.; Guan, S.; Burlingame, A.L.; Wang, Z.-Y. The CDG1 Kinase Mediates Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction from BRI1 Receptor Kinase to BSU1 Phosphatase and GSK3-like Kinase BIN2. Mol. Cell 2011, 43, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, J.; Nam, K.H.; Vafeados, D.; Chory, J. BIN2, a New Brassinosteroid-Insensitive Locus in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. He, J.-X.; Gendron, J.M.; Yang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.-Y. The GSK3-like kinase BIN2 phosphorylates and destabilizes BZR1, a positive regulator of the brassinosteroid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, La Jolla, CA, USA, 23 July 2002; pp. 10185–10190. [Google Scholar]
  37. Vert, G.; Chory, J. Downstream nuclear events in brassinosteroid signalling. Nature 2006, 441, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ye, H.; Li, L.; Guo, H.; Yin, Y. MYBL2 is a substrate of GSK3-like kinase BIN2 and acts as a corepressor of BES1 in brassinosteroid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 20142–20147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, Z.-Y.; Nakano, T.; Gendron, J.; He, J.; Chen, M.; Vafeados, D.; Yang, Y.; Fujioka, S.; Yoshida, S.; Asami, T.; et al. Nuclear-Localized BZR1 Mediates Brassinosteroid-Induced Growth and Feedback Suppression of Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis. Dev. Cell 2002, 2, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yin, Y.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Mora-Garcia, S.; Li, J.; Yoshida, S.; Asami, T.; Chory, J. BES1 Accumulates in the Nucleus in Response to Brassinosteroids to Regulate Gene Expression and Promote Stem Elongation. Cell 2002, 109, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, W.; Lv, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, P.-A.; Cui, Y.; Li, M.; Wang, R.; Gou, X.; Li, J. BES1 is activated by EMS1-TPD1-SERK1/2-mediated signaling to control tapetum development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lundqvist, U. Scandinavian mutation research in barley—A historical review. Hereditas 2014, 151, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Vert, G.; Nemhauser, J.L.; Geldner, N.; Hong, F.; Chory, J. Molecular mechanisms of steroid hormone signaling in plants. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005, 21, 177–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jiang, J.; Zhang, C.; Wang, X. Ligand Perception, Activation, and Early Signaling of Plant Steroid Receptor Brassinosteroid Insensitive 1. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55, 1198–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. He, Z.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Li, J.; Zhu, Q.; Lamb, C.; Ronald, P.; Chory, J. Perception of Brassinosteroids by the Extracellular Domain of the Receptor Kinase BRI1. Science 2000, 288, 2360–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, Z.-Y.; Seto, H.; Fujioka, S.; Yoshida, S.; Chory, J. BRI1 is a critical component of a plasma-membrane receptor for plant steroids. Nature 2001, 410, 380–383, Erratum in 2001, 411, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Santiago, J.; Henzler, C.; Hothorn, M. Molecular Mechanism for Plant Steroid Receptor Activation by Somatic Embryogenesis Co-Receptor Kinases. Science 2013, 341, 889–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bojar, D.; Martinez, J.; Santiago, J.; Rybin, V.; Bayliss, R.; Hothorn, M. Crystal structures of the phosphorylated BRI1 kinase domain and implications for brassinosteroid signal initiation. Plant J. 2014, 78, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Friedrichsen, D.M.; Joazeiro, C.A.P.; Li, J.; Hunter, T.; Chory, J. Brassinosteroid-Insensitive-1 is a Ubiquitously Expressed Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor Serine/Threonine Kinase. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 1247–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kang, B.; Wang, H.; Nam, K.H.; Li, J.; Li, J. Activation-Tagged Suppressors of a Weak Brassinosteroid Receptor Mutant. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, C.; Yan, K.; Han, J.-T.; Tao, L.; Lv, M.-H.; Shi, T.; He, Y.-X.; Wierzba, M.; Tax, F.E.; Li, J. Scanning for New BRI1 Mutations via TILLING Analysis. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 1881–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jin, H.; Yan, Z.; Nam, K.H.; Li, J. Allele-Specific Suppression of a Defective Brassinosteroid Receptor Reveals a Physiological Role of UGGT in ER Quality Control. Mol. Cell 2007, 26, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hong, Z.; Jin, H.; Tzfira, T.; Li, J. Multiple Mechanism–Mediated Retention of a Defective Brassinosteroid Receptor in the Endoplasmic Reticulum of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 3418–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cheng, X.; Gou, X.; Yin, H.; Mysore, K.S.; Li, J.; Wen, J. Functional characterisation of brassinosteroid receptor MtBRI1 in Medicago truncatula. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yamamuro, C.; Ihara, Y.; Wu, X.; Noguchi, T.; Fujioka, S.; Takatsuto, S.; Ashikari, M.; Kitano, H.; Matsuoka, M. Loss of Function of a Rice brassinosteroid insensitive1 Homolog Prevents Internode Elongation and Bending of the Lamina Joint. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1591–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Goddard, R.; Peraldi, A.; Ridout, C.; Nicholson, P. Enhanced Disease Resistance Caused by BRI1 Mutation Is Conserved Between Brachypodium distachyon and Barley (Hordeum vulgare). Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 1095–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bleecker, A.B.; Estelle, M.A.; Somerville, C.; Kende, H. Insensitivity to Ethylene Conferred by a Dominant Mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 1988, 241, 1086–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chang, C.; Kwok, S.F.; Bleecker, A.B.; Meyerowitz, E.M. Arabidopsis Ethylene-Response Gene ETR1: Similarity of Product to Two-Component Regulators. Science 1993, 262, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Chory, J.; Nagpal, P.; Peto, C.A. Phenotypic and Genetic Analysis of det2, a New Mutant That Affects Light-Regulated Seedling Development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1991, 3, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Szekeres, M.; Németh, K.; Koncz-Kálmán, Z.; Mathur, J.; Kauschmann, A.; Altmann, T.; Rédei, G.P.; Nagy, F.; Schell, J.; Koncz, C. Brassinosteroids Rescue the Deficiency of CYP90, a Cytochrome P450, Controlling Cell Elongation and De-etiolation in Arabidopsis. Cell 1996, 85, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Clouse, S.D.; Langford, M.; Mcmorris, T.C. A Brassinosteroid-Lnsensitive Mutant in Arabidopsis thaliana Exhibits Multiple Defects in Growth and Development’. Plant Physiol. 1996, 111, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kwon, M.; Choe, S. Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis and Dwarf Mutants. J. Plant Biol. 2005, 48, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kauschmann, A.; Jessop, A.; Koncz, C.; Szekeres, M.; Willmitzer, L.; Altmann, T. Genetic Evidence for an Essential Role of Brassinosteroids in Plant Development. Plant J. 1996, 9, 701–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Noguchi, T.; Fujioka, S.; Choe, S.; Takatsuto, S.; Yoshida, S.; Yuan, H.; Feldmann, K.A.; Tax, F.E. Brassinosteroid-Insensitive Dwarf Mutants of Arabidopsis Accumulate Brassinosteroids. Plant Physiol. 1999, 121, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Belkhadir, Y.; Durbak, A.; Wierzba, M.; Schmitz, R.J.; Aguirre, A.; Michel, R.; Rowe, S.; Fujioka, S.; Tax, F.E. Intragenic Suppression of a Trafficking-Defective Brassinosteroid Receptor Mutant in Arabidopsis. Genetics 2010, 185, 1283–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shang, Y.; Lee, M.M.; Li, J.; Nam, K.H. Characterization of Cp3 Reveals a New Bri1 Allele, Bri1-120, and the Importance of the LRR Domain of BRI1 Mediating BR Signaling. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bouquin, T.; Meier, C.; Foster, R.; Nielsen, M.E.; Mundy, J. Control of Specific Gene Expression by Gibberellin and Brassinosteroid. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hou, Q.; Saima, S.; Ren, H.; Ali, K.; Bai, C.; Wu, G.; Li, G. Less Conserved LRRS Is Important for BRI1 Folding. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lv, M.; Li, M.; Chen, W.; Wang, Y.; Sun, C.; Yin, H.; He, K.; Li, J. Thermal-Enhanced Bri1-301 Instability Reveals a Plasma Membrane Protein Quality Control System in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xu, W.; Huang, J.; Li, B.; Li, J.; Wang, Y. Is Kinase Activity Essential for Biological Functions of BRI1? Cell Res. 2008, 18, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, X.; Zhou, L.; Qin, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, M.; Mao, J.; Zhang, J.; He, Z.; Liu, L.; et al. A Temperature-Sensitive Misfolded Bri1-301 Receptor Requires Its Kinase Activity to Promote Growth 1[Open]. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 1704–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhao, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Erhardt, M.; Ruan, Y.; Shen, W.H. A Non-Canonical Transferred DNA Insertion at the BRI1 Locus in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2009, 51, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gou, X.; Yin, H.; He, K.; Du, J.; Yi, J.; Xu, S.; Lin, H.; Clouse, S.D.; Li, J. Genetic Evidence for an Indispensable Role of Somatic Embryogenesis Receptor Kinases in Brassinosteroid Signaling. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Holzwart, E.; Wanke, F.; Glöckner, N.; Höfte, H.; Harter, K.; Wolf, S. A Mutant Allele Uncouples the Brassinosteroid-Dependent and Independent Functions of Brassinosteroid Insensitive 1. Plant Physiol. 2019, 182, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wolf, S.; Mravec, J.; Greiner, S.; Mouille, G.; Höfte, H. Plant Cell Wall Homeostasis Is Mediated by Brassinosteroid Feedback Signaling. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 1732–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chory, J. Out of Darkness: Mutants Reveal Pathways Controlling Light-Regulated Development in Plants. Trends Genet. 1993, 9, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Deng, X.W. Fresh View of Light Signal Transduction in Plants. Cell 1994, 76, 423–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Altmann, T.; Felix, G.; Jessop, A.; Kauschmann, A.; Uwer, U.; Peña-Cortés, H.; Willmitzer, L. Ac/Ds Transposon Mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: Mutant Spectrum and Frequency of Ds Insertion Mutants. MGG Mol. Gen. Genet. 1995, 247, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wei, N.; Kwok, S.F.; Von Arnim, A.G.; Lee, A.; McNellis, T.W.; Piekos, B.; Deng, X.W. Arabidopsis COP8, COP10, and COP11 Genes Are Involved in Repression of Photomorphogenic Development in Darkness. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Walker, J.C. Receptor-like Protein Kinase Genes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1993, 3, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Azpiroz, R.; Wu, Y.; LoCascio, J.C.; Feldmann, K.A. An Arabidopsis Brassinosteroid-Dependent Mutant Is Blocked in Cell Elongation. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Turk, E.M.; Fujioka, S.; Seto, H.; Shimada, Y.; Takatsuto, S.; Yoshida, S.; Wang, H.; Torres, Q.I.; Ward, J.M.; Murthy, G.; et al. BAS1 and SOB7 act redundantly to modulate Arabidopsis photomorphogenesis via unique brassinosteroid inactivation mechanisms. Plant J. 2005, 42, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Nomura, T.; Nakayama, M.; Reid, J.B.; Takeuchi, Y.; Yokota, T. Blockage of Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis and Sensitivity Causes Dwarfism in Garden Pea. Plant Physiol. 1997, 113, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Nomura, T.; Kitasaka, Y.; Takatsuto, S.; Reid, J.B.; Fukami, M.; Yokota, T. Brassinosteroid/Sterol Synthesis and Plant Growth as Affected by lka and lkb Mutations of Pea1. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119, 1517–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Nomura, T.; Bishop, G.J.; Kaneta, T.; Reid, J.B.; Chory, J.; Yokota, T. The LKA gene is a BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1 homolog of pea. Plant J. 2003, 36, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Koka, C.V.; Cerny, R.E.; Gardner, R.G.; Noguchi, T.; Fujioka, S.; Takatsuto, S.; Yoshida, S.; Clouse, S.D. A Putative Role for the Tomato Genes DUMPY and CURL-3 in Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis and Response. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Montoya, T.; Nomura, T.; Farrar, K.; Kaneta, T.; Yokota, T.; Bishop, G.J. Cloning the Tomato Curl3 Gene Highlights the Putative Dual Role of the Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptor Kinase tBRI1/SR160 in Plant Steroid Hormone and Peptide Hormone Signaling. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 3163–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Morinaka, Y.; Sakamoto, T.; Inukai, Y.; Agetsuma, M.; Kitano, H.; Ashikari, M.; Matsuoka, M. Morphological Alteration Caused by Brassinosteroid Insensitivity Increases the Biomass and Grain Production of Rice. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 924–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Nakamura, A.; Fujioka, S.; Sunohara, H.; Kamiya, N.; Hong, Z.; Inukai, Y.; Miura, K.; Takatsuto, S.; Yoshida, S.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; et al. The Role of OsBRI1 and Its Homologous Genes, OsBRL1 and OsBRL3, in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 580–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zhao, J.; Wu, C.; Yuan, S.; Yin, L.; Sun, W.; Zhao, Q.; Zhao, B.; Li, X. Kinase activity of OsBRI1 is essential for brassinosteroids to regulate rice growth and development. Plant Sci. 2013, 199–200, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Takeda, K. Internode Elongation and Dwarfism in Some Gramineous Plants. Gamma Field Symp. 1979, 16, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  92. Hong, Z.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Shimizu-Sato, S.; Inukai, Y.; Fujioka, S.; Shimada, Y.; Takatsuto, S.; Agetsuma, M.; Yoshida, S.; Watanabe, Y.; et al. Loss-of-function of a rice brassinosteroid biosynthetic enzyme, C-6 oxidase, prevents the organized arrangement and polar elongation of cells in the leaves and stem. Plant J. 2002, 32, 495–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Chono, M.; Honda, I.; Zeniya, H.; Yoneyama, K.; Saisho, D.; Takeda, K.; Takatsuto, S.; Hoshino, T.; Watanabe, Y. A Semidwarf Phenotype of Barley uzu Results from a Nucleotide Substitution in the Gene Encoding a Putative Brassinosteroid Receptor. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 1209–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Dockter, C.; Gruszka, D.; Braumann, I.; Druka, A.; Druka, I.; Franckowiak, J.; Gough, S.P.; Janeczko, A.; Kurowska, M.; Lundqvist, J.; et al. Induced Variations in Brassinosteroid Genes Define Barley Height and Sturdiness, and Expand the Green Revolution Genetic Toolkit. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1912–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Gruszka, D.; Szarejko, I.; Maluszynski, M. New allele of HvBRI1 gene encoding brassinosteroid receptor in barley. J. Appl. Genet. 2011, 52, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bosshard, H.R.; Marti, D.N.; Jelesarov, I. Protein stabilization by salt bridges: Concepts, experimental approaches and clarification of some misunderstandings. J. Mol. Recognit. 2004, 17, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Li, H.; Chen, G.; Yan, W. Molecular Characterization of Barley 3H Semi-Dwarf Genes. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jiang, C.; Lei, M.; Guo, Y.; Gao, G.; Shi, L.; Jin, Y.; Cai, Y.; Himmelbach, A.; Zhou, S.; He, Q.; et al. A reference-guided TILLING by amplicon-sequencing platform supports forward and reverse genetics in barley. Plant Commun. 2022, 3, 100317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Thole, V.; Peraldi, A.; Worland, B.; Nicholson, P.; Doonan, J.H.; Vain, P. T-DNA mutagenesis in Brachypodium distachyon. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 63, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yang, B.; Zhou, S.; Ou, L.; Liu, F.; Yang, L.; Zheng, J.; Chen, W.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, S.; Ma, Y.; et al. A novel single-base mutation in CaBRI1 confers dwarf phenotype and brassinosteroid accumulation in pepper. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2019, 295, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, X.; Kota, U.; He, K.; Blackburn, K.; Li, J.; Goshe, M.B.; Huber, S.C.; Clouse, S.D. Sequential Transphosphorylation of the BRI1/BAK1 Receptor Kinase Complex Impacts Early Events in Brassinosteroid Signaling. Dev. Cell 2008, 15, 220–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, J.; Lease, K.A.; Tax, F.E.; Walker, J.C. BRS1, a serine carboxypeptidase, regulates BRI1 signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 5916–5921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Yuan, T.; Fujioka, S.; Takatsuto, S.; Matsumoto, S.; Gou, X.; He, K.; Russell, S.D.; Li, J. BEN1, a gene encoding a dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR)-like protein, regulates the levels of brassinosteroids in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2007, 51, 220–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Guo, Z.; Fujioka, S.; Blancaflor, E.B.; Miao, S.; Gou, X.; Li, J. TCP1 Modulates Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis by Regulating the Expression of the Key Biosynthetic Gene DWARF4 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 1161–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Wei, Z.; Yuan, T.; Tarkowská, D.; Kim, J.; Nam, H.G.; Novák, O.; He, K.; Gou, X.; Li, J. Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis Is Modulated via a Transcription Factor Cascade of COG1, PIF4, and PIF5. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 1260–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Su, W.; Liu, Y.; Xia, Y.; Hong, Z.; Li, J. Conserved endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation system to eliminate mutated receptor-like kinases in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 108, 870–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hong, Z.; Kajiura, H.; Su, W.; Jin, H.; Kimura, A.; Fujiyama, K.; Li, J. Evolutionarily conserved glycan signal to degrade aberrant brassinosteroid receptors in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 11437–11442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, D.; Su, W.; Liu, L.; Wang, M.; Li, J. EBS7 is a plant-specific component of a highly conserved endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation system in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 12205–12210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, H.; Zhu, Y.; Fujioka, S.; Asami, T.; Li, J.; Li, J. Regulation of Arabidopsis Brassinosteroid Signaling by Atypical Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3781–3791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Khush, G.S. Green Revolution: Preparing for the 21st Century. Genome 1999, 42, 646–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Peng, J.; Richards, D.E.; Hartley, N.M.; Murphy, G.P.; Devos, K.M.; Flintham, J.E.; Beales, J.; Fish, L.J.; Worland, A.J.; Pelica, F.; et al. ‘Green revolution’ genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature 1999, 400, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Sasaki, A.; Ashikari, M.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Itoh, H.; Nishimura, A.; Swapan, D.; Ishiyama, K.; Saito, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Khush, G.S.; et al. Green Revolution: A Mutant Gibberellin-Synthesis Gene in Rice. Nature 2002, 416, 701–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Spielmeyer, W.; Ellis, M.H.; Chandler, P.M. Semidwarf (sd-1), “green revolution” rice, contains a defective gibberellin 20-oxidase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 9043–9048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Vriet, C.; Russinova, E.; Reuzeau, C. Boosting Crop Yields with Plant Steroids. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 842–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Saisho, D.; Tanno, K.-I.; Chono, M.; Honda, I.; Kitano, H.; Takeda, K. Spontaneous Brassinolide-insensitive Barley Mutants ‘uzu’ Adapted to East Asia. Breed. Sci. 2004, 54, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Honda, I.; Zeniya, H.; Yoneyama, K.; Chono, M.; Kaneko, S.; Watanabe, Y. UzuMutation in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Reduces the Leaf Unrolling Response to Brassinolide. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003, 67, 1194–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Manghwar, H.; Hussain, A.; Ali, Q.; Liu, F. Brassinosteroids (BRs) Role in Plant Development and Coping with Different Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Chen, G.; Yan, W.; Liu, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zhou, M.; Zheng, Y.-L.; Manners, J.M.; Liu, C. The non-gibberellic acid-responsive semi-dwarfing gene uzu affects Fusarium crown rot resistance in barley. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ali, S.S.; Gunupuru, L.R.; Kumar, G.B.S.; Khan, M.; Scofield, S.; Nicholson, P.; Doohan, F.M. Plant disease resistance is augmented in uzu barley lines modified in the brassinosteroid receptor BRI1. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Nolan, T.M.; Vukašinović, N.; Liu, D.; Russinova, E.; Yin, Y. Brassinosteroids: Multidimensional Regulators of Plant Growth, Development, and Stress Responses. Plant Cell 2019, 32, 295–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Fahad, S.; Bajwa, A.A.; Nazir, U.; Anjum, S.A.; Farooq, A.; Zohaib, A.; Sadia, S.; Nasim, W.; Adkins, S.; Saud, S.; et al. Crop Production under Drought and Heat Stress: Plant Responses and Management Options. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Rao, D.E.; Chaitanya, K.V. Photosynthesis and antioxidative defense mechanisms in deciphering drought stress tolerance of crop plants. Biol. Plant. 2016, 60, 201–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Gruszka, D.; Janeczko, A.; Dziurka, M.; Pociecha, E.; Oklestkova, J.; Szarejko, I. Barley Brassinosteroid Mutants Provide an Insight into Phytohormonal Homeostasis in Plant Reaction to Drought Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Gruszka, D.; Janeczko, A.; Dziurka, M.; Pociecha, E.; Fodor, J. Non-enzymatic antioxidant accumulations in BR-deficient and BR-insensitive barley mutants under control and drought conditions. Physiol. Plant. 2017, 163, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Kim, S.Y.; Kim, B.H.; Lim, C.J.; Lim, C.O.; Nam, K.H. Constitutive activation of stress-inducible genes in a brassinosteroid-insensitive 1 (bri1) mutant results in higher tolerance to cold. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 138, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Gruszka, D. Exploring the Brassinosteroid Signaling in Monocots Reveals Novel Components of the Pathway and Implications for Plant Breeding. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Clouse, S.D. A History of Brassinosteroid Research from 1970 through 2005: Thirty-Five Years of Phytochemistry, Physiology, Genes, and Mutants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 34, 828–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Gruszka, D. Crosstalk of the Brassinosteroid Signalosome with Phytohormonal and Stress Signaling Components Maintains a Balance between the Processes of Growth and Stress Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagram showing bri1 alleles in Arabidopsis identified so far; for references, see Table 1. Leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), island domain (ID), transmembrane (TM), juxtamembrane (JM), kinase domain (KD), and activation loop (AL). ∆ represents deletion, * represents stop codon.
Figure 1. Diagram showing bri1 alleles in Arabidopsis identified so far; for references, see Table 1. Leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), island domain (ID), transmembrane (TM), juxtamembrane (JM), kinase domain (KD), and activation loop (AL). ∆ represents deletion, * represents stop codon.
Ijms 25 08111 g001
Figure 2. Diagram showing mutation sites in BRI1 orthologs of tomato, pea, pepper, and M. truncatula. Leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), island domain (ID), transmembrane (TM), juxtamembrane (JM), and kinase domain (KD).
Figure 2. Diagram showing mutation sites in BRI1 orthologs of tomato, pea, pepper, and M. truncatula. Leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), island domain (ID), transmembrane (TM), juxtamembrane (JM), and kinase domain (KD).
Ijms 25 08111 g002
Figure 3. Diagram showing d61 alleles in rice. Leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) island domain (ID), transmembrane (TM), juxtamembrane (JM), and kinase domain (KD).
Figure 3. Diagram showing d61 alleles in rice. Leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) island domain (ID), transmembrane (TM), juxtamembrane (JM), and kinase domain (KD).
Ijms 25 08111 g003
Figure 4. Diagram showing uzu1 alleles in barley. Leucine-rich repeats (LLRs), island domain (ID), transmembrane (TM), juxtamembrane (JM), and kinase domain (KD).
Figure 4. Diagram showing uzu1 alleles in barley. Leucine-rich repeats (LLRs), island domain (ID), transmembrane (TM), juxtamembrane (JM), and kinase domain (KD).
Ijms 25 08111 g004
Figure 5. Showing biological uses of bri1 alleles and its orthologs. These mutants have some unique features, i.e., resistance to a range of pathogens, tolerance to cold and drought; agronomically valued dwarf variety, and as a genetic tool.
Figure 5. Showing biological uses of bri1 alleles and its orthologs. These mutants have some unique features, i.e., resistance to a range of pathogens, tolerance to cold and drought; agronomically valued dwarf variety, and as a genetic tool.
Ijms 25 08111 g005
Table 1. bri1 alleles in Arabidopsis.
Table 1. bri1 alleles in Arabidopsis.
AllelesBase Pair ChangeAmino Acid ChangeAccessionAllelic Strength/
Phenotype
Possible Mechanism References
bri1-1G2725AAla-909-ThrCol-0StrongExtremely weak in vivo BL-stimulated BAK1 phosphorylation[49,61]
bri1-2/cbb2Transposon insertionNilCol-0StrongImpaired BRI1[63]
bri1-34-bp deletion after 2745STOP 44 aa downstream Wassilewskija-2 (WS2)StrongImpaired BRI1 KD[64]
bri1-410-bp deletion after 459STOP 13 aa downstreamWS2StrongNo BRI1[64]
bri1-5G206ACys-69-TyrWS2WeakER retention[64]
bri1-5R1G260AGly-87-Glubri1-5/WS2WeakPartially restore ER retention of bri1-5[65]
bri1-6/119G1931AGly-644-AspEnkheim-2 (En-2)WeakUnknown[49,64]
bri1-7G1838AGly-613-SerWS2WeakImpaired BL binding[64]
bri1-8/108/112G2948AArg-983-GlnWS2/Col-0IntermediateAutophosphorylation cannot be detected in vitro[49,64]
bri1-9C1985TSer-662-PheWS2/Col-0WeakER retention[64]
bri1-101G3232AGlu-1078-LysCol-0StrongAutophosphorylation cannot be detected in vitro[18,49]
bri1-102C2249TThr-750-IleCol-0StrongUnknown[49]
bri1-103/104G3091AAla-1031-ThrCol-0StrongUnknown[18,49]
bri1-105/106/107C3175TGln-1059-StopCol-0StrongImpaired BRI1 KD[18,49]
bri1-113G1832AGly-611-GluCol-0StrongImpaired BL binding[18]
bri1-114/116C1747TGln-583-StopCol-0StrongNo BRI1[18,49]
bri1-115G3143AGly-1048-AspCol-0StrongUnknown[18]
bri1-117/118G3415AAsp-1139-AsnCol-0StrongUnknown[18,49]
bri1-120/cp3T1196CSer-399-PheLandsberg erectaWeakUnknown[66]
bri1-2018bp deletion STOP 44 aa downstreamCol-0StrongPremature stop[67]
bri1-201-1G1831AGly-611-ArgWS2Strong, late-flowering ld-3 enhancerUnknown[8]
bri1-202C2854TArg-952-TrpWS2Strong, late-flowering ld-3 enhancerUnknown[8]
bri1-235C468TSer-156-PheCol-0Weak ER retention[68]
bri1-301GG2965/6ATGly-989-IleCol-0Weak Kinase dead, thermally unstable [69,70,71]
saladeTransposon insertiongenome deletion Col-0StrongNo BRI1[72]
bri1-701T-DNA insertionNilCol-0StrongNo BRI1[73]
bri1-702C3148TPro-1050-SerCol-0WeakReduced autophosphorylation in vitro[51]
bri1-703G3166AGlu-1056-LysCol-0StrongAutophosphorylation cannot be detected in vitro[51]
bri1-704G3079AAsp-1027-AsnCol-0StrongAutophosphorylation cannot be detected in vitro[51]
bri1-705C2156TPro-719-LeuCol-0SubtleDisrupt the formation of hydrogen bonds among BRI1, BL, and BAK1[51]
bri1-706C758TSer-253-PheCol-0SubtleUnknown[51]
bri1-708C2947GArg-938-GlyCol-0StrongAutophosphorylation cannot be detected in vitro[51]
bri1-709G2543ATrp-848-StopCol-0StrongPremature stop[51]
bri1-710G1858AGly-620-ArgCol-0SubtleUnknown[51]
bri1-711/bri1cnu4G2236AGly-746-SerCol-0SubtleUnknown[51,74]
bri1cnu1G2831AGly-944-AspCol-0WeakUnknown[75]
bri1cnu3G2307TArg-769-TrpCol-0WeakUnknown[74]
Table 2. d61 alleles of rice.
Table 2. d61 alleles of rice.
AlleleBase Pair ChangeAmino Acid ChangePhenotypeFertilityReference
d61-1C to TThr-989-IleMild Fertile[55]
d61-2G to AVal-491-MetIntermediateFertile[55]
d61-3A to CHis-420-ProSevereSterile[89]
d61-4G to TGlu-847-StopSevereSterile[89]
d61-5A to TAsn-426-TyrSevereSterile[89]
d61-62 bp insertionAsp-759-stopSevereSterile[89]
d61-7C to TAla-467-ValMild Fertile[89]
d61-8G to AGly-522-GluMild Fertile[89]
d61-9G to AGly-539-AspMild Fertile[89]
d61-10C to AThr-854-IleMild Fertile[89]
Fn189A to TIle-834-PheMildFertile[90]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zada, A.; Lv, M.; Li, J. Molecular Lesions in BRI1 and Its Orthologs in the Plant Kingdom. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158111

AMA Style

Zada A, Lv M, Li J. Molecular Lesions in BRI1 and Its Orthologs in the Plant Kingdom. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(15):8111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158111

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zada, Ahmad, Minghui Lv, and Jia Li. 2024. "Molecular Lesions in BRI1 and Its Orthologs in the Plant Kingdom" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 15: 8111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158111

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop