Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Efficacy of Protease Inactivation for the Preservation of Bioactive Amphibian Skin Peptides
Previous Article in Journal
Quantification of Photoreceptors’ Changes in a Diabetic Retinopathy Model with Two-Photon Imaging Microscopy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Leukocytes within Autologous Blood Concentrates Have No Impact on the Growth and Proliferation of Human Primary Osteoblasts: An In Vitro Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Research on Bone Cells in Health and Disease

Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University School of Medicine, 1094 Budapest, Hungary
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(16), 8758; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168758
Submission received: 6 August 2024 / Accepted: 9 August 2024 / Published: 12 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Bone Cells in Health and Disease)
Bone-forming osteoblasts, osteocytes, and bone-resorbing osteoclasts are responsible for life-long skeletal remodeling. Their abnormal function contributes to the development of bone diseases such as osteoporosis, osteopetrosis, tumor-induced osteolysis, and inflammatory arthritis-related bone loss [1]. This Special Issue entitled “Research on Bone Cells in Health and Disease” in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences provides new insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying bone formation and resorption, with a special focus on the activation of osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts in physiological and pathological conditions.
Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mineral density and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue that results in fragility fractures. In Western societies and developed countries with an aging population, the incidence of senile, postmenopausal, and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis increases dramatically [2]. Osteopetrosis is characterized by enhanced bone density, abnormal bone formation, and highly mineralized cartilage. It is also called “marble bone disease”, where enhanced bone density is considered to be a consequence of failure in bone resorption [3]. Osteolytic bone metastases, where bone tissue is destroyed, lead to pathological fractures and increased patient mortality [4]. Although cancer cells forming skeletal lesions are able to exert proteolytic activity to some degree, they cannot break down the bone matrix. Evidence suggests that interaction between tumor and bone cells is essential for successful osteotropic tumor cell metastatic dissemination. Finally, inflammatory arthritis is a manifestation of chronic inflammation affecting the synovial membrane of the joints and the periarticular bone. Bone destruction in inflammatory arthritis is best described in rheumatoid arthritis, where inflammation of the synovial joints is accompanied by cartilage and bone destruction [5].
Osteoblasts are involved in the formation of bone tissue and in skeletal remodeling. They are derived from mesenchymal stem cells via the activation of the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway. Their precursors are recruited to bone by growth factors such as TGF-β and IGF-14, which are released from the bone matrix during bone resorption [6]. Mature osteoblasts are found to be present on the surface of the newly formed bone in a monolayer. They secrete the osteoid matrix at the edges of old bone tissue, where new bone formation takes place. The osteoid is the organic part of the extracellular matrix of the bone, and it is composed primarily of type I collagen. Due to the production of the osteoid matrix and the activation of the enzyme called alkaline phosphatase in the membrane of the osteoblast, the osteoid around the osteoblast begins to calcify, and hydroxyapatite crystals appear. Finally, mature osteoblasts transit to osteocytes or undergo apoptosis [6].
Osteocytes embedded in the bone matrix were considered to be able to regulate bone remodeling by activating both bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts. Recent evidence indicates that besides the above-mentioned important functions, osteocytes also have a higher capacity to induce osteoclastogenesis than other stromal cells of the bone, and they are the major source of growth factors and differentiation inducers for osteoclast development [7].
The other key cell type involved in the pathogenesis of the previously mentioned diseases is the osteoclast, the unique bone-resorbing cell of the human body [8]. Physiologically, osteoclast development is directed by two main growth factors, receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), which are provided by stromal cells such as osteoblasts [9]. The first phase of osteoclast development is then determined by the expression of various osteoclast-specific genes, such as tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase (TRAP) and nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFATc1) in pre-osteoclasts [10]. During the second phase of osteoclast differentiation, fusion of these pre-osteoclasts happens, leading to the development of large, multinucleated, mature osteoclasts [11]. Finally, those mature polykarions spread over the bone surface by forming actin rings and sealing zones in order to degrade the bone matrix via the parallel release of digestive enzymes and hydrochloric acid [12].
The first study in this Special Issue, by Mourão et al. [13], characterizes the effects of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on human primary osteoblasts (pOBs). Importantly, PRF promoted pOBs proliferation, independent of high (710 g) or low (44 g) relative centrifugal force (RCF)-based separation, while low RCF PRF contained higher quantities of TGF-β, leukocytes, and platelets. These findings may contribute to a better understanding of the cellular mechanisms of bone regeneration and can help to improve patient outcomes by advancing regenerative medicine.
The next study by Hasegawa et al. [14] examines minimodeling-based bone formation between the epiphyses and metaphyses of the long bones of eldecalcitol (ELD)-treated ovariectomized (OVX) rats. According to their results, ELD administration augmented bone volume and trabecular thickness by decreasing the number of osteoclasts in both the epiphyses and metaphyses of OVX rats. The epiphyses of the long bones of the ELD-treated animals demonstrated significantly increased minimodeling-based bone formation compared to remodeling-based bone formation. Further, the minimodeling-induced new bone formation contained few sclerostin-positive osteocytes, while the underlying pre-existing bone harbored many. Therefore, authors conclude that ELD can induce minimodeling-based bone formation in the epiphyses rather than in the metaphyses, and ELD-driven minimodeling may be associated with the inhibition of sclerostin synthesis.
The next research, conducted by Sung-Ju Lee and his colleagues [15], investigates the impact of the aqueous ethanol extract of Radix Asteris (EERA) on osteoclast differentiation and its contribution to osteoporosis management. They found that EERA retained osteoclast differentiation by inhibiting RANKL expression and RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. EERA strongly decreased RANKL-dependent expression of NFATc1, a key master regulator of osteoclastogenesis. When the authors conducted a phytochemical analysis of EERA, they identified several constituents involved in the regulation of bone and fat metabolism. Thus, their findings highlight the potential of EERA in the regulation of osteoclast development and may represent therapeutic potential for postmenopausal osteoporosis associated with metabolic imbalances.
The first review article in this Special Issue, by Chaekyun Kim [16], focuses on the roles of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) in osteoclast differentiation. ERKs, p38, and c-Jun N-terminal kinases belong to mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and play critical roles in regulating osteoclast proliferation, differentiation, and function. In most circumstances, ERKs positively regulate osteoclast development and function. However, inhibition of osteoclast differentiation by ERK1/2 was also observed, e.g., in RAW 264.7 cell-derived osteoclasts, by different research groups. The current understanding of the essential but contrasting roles of ERK1/2 during osteoclast development is summarized in this review.
Finally, in the last review article in this Special Issue, Sandor et al. [17] highlight the local effects of steroid hormones within the bone microenvironment and during the development of osteolytic bone metastases. Recently, accumulating evidence indicated the role of steroid hormones produced locally within the nervous and immune systems, skin, adipose tissue, and intestine [18,19]. This so-called extraglandular steroidogenesis is independently controlled from the feedback regulatory mechanisms of the hypothalamus–pituitary–steroidogenic gland axis regulating the hormone secretion of the adrenal cortex, gonads, and placenta (also known as glandular steroidogenesis). Bone cells, i.e., osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts can respond to steroid hormones produced within the bone microenvironment, and our group recently identified a key role for extranglandular de novo steroidogenesis in osteotropic tumor cells during osteolytic skeletal lesion formation [20]. The identification of the steroid pregnenolone and its derivates, which play important roles in the regulation of bone homeostasis and the metastatic dissemination of cancer cells, is also discussed in detail in this review.
A better understanding of the molecular mechanism of osteoblast, osteocyte, and osteoclast activation in health and disease may facilitate the development of novel therapies for the treatment of skeletal diseases associated with pathological bone remodeling, e.g., osteoporosis, osteopetrosis, tumor-induced osteolysis, and inflammatory arthritis-related bone loss. For instance, current anti-resorptive therapies that block osteoclastogenesis by targeting RANKL (e.g., denosumab) or promote the apoptosis of osteoclasts (e.g., bisphosphonates) likely inhibit osteoclast-osteoblast and osteoclast-osteocyte interaction as well, since osteoclasts are known to release factors that regulate osteoblast and osteocyte activity [21]. Therefore, identifying novel markers and genes that regulate only the later stages of osteoclastogenesis while maintaining the ability of osteoclasts to differentiate may keep osteoblast and osteocyte signaling intact within the bone microenvironment.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lin:, J.T.; Lane, J.M. Osteoporosis: A review. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2004, 425, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Eastell, R.; O’Neill, T.W.; Hofbauer, L.C.; Langdahl, B.; Reid, I.R.; Gold, D.T.; Cummings, S.R. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2016, 2, 16069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sobacchi, C.; Schulz, A.; Coxon, F.P.; Villa, A.; Helfrich, M.H. Osteopetrosis: Genetics, treatment and new insights into osteoclast function. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2013, 9, 522–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Győri, D.S.; Mócsai, A. Osteoclast Signal Transduction During Bone Metastasis Formation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Győri, D.S.; Mócsai, A. Osteoclasts in Inflammation. In Compendium of Inflammatory Diseases; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dirckx, N.; Moorer, M.C.; Clemens, T.L.; Riddle, R.C. The role of osteoblasts in energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 651–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nakashima, T.; Hayashi, M.; Fukunaga, T.; Kurata, K.; Oh-Hora, M.; Feng, J.Q.; Bonewald, L.F.; Kodama, T.; Wutz, A.; Wagner, E.F.; et al. Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 1231–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Feng, X.; Teitelbaum, S.L. Osteoclasts: New Insights. Bone Res. 2013, 1, 11–26. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jacome-Galarza, C.E.; Percin, G.I.; Muller, J.T.; Mass, E.; Lazarov, T.; Eitler, J.; Rauner, M.; Yadav, V.K.; Crozet, L.; Bohm, M.; et al. Developmental origin, functional maintenance and genetic rescue of osteoclasts. Nature 2019, 568, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Győri, D.; Csete, D.; Benkő, S.; Kulkarni, S.; Mandl, P.; Dobó-Nagy, C.; Vanhaesebroeck, B.; Stephens, L.; Hawkins, P.T.; Mócsai, A. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase isoform PI3Kβ regulates osteoclast-mediated bone resorption in humans and mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014, 66, 2210–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kertész, Z.; Gyori, D.; Körmendi, S.; Fekete, T.; Kis-Tóth, K.; Jakus, Z.; Schett, G.; Rajnavölgyi, E.; Dobó-Nagy, C.; Mócsai, A. Phospholipase Cγ2 is required for basal but not oestrogen deficiency-induced bone resorption. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 42, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Teitelbaum, S.L. Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science 2000, 289, 1504–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mourão, C.F.; Dohle, E.; Bayrak, B.; Winter, A.; Sader, R.; Ghanaati, S. Leukocytes within Autologous Blood Concentrates Have No Impact on the Growth and Proliferation of Human Primary Osteoblasts: An In Vitro Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hasegawa, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Hongo, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Haraguchi-Kitakamae, M.; Ishizu, H.; Shimizu, T.; Saito, H.; Sakai, S.; Yogo, K.; et al. Eldecalcitol Induces Minimodeling-Based Bone Formation and Inhibits Sclerostin Synthesis Preferentially in the Epiphyses Rather than the Metaphyses of the Long Bones in Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, S.J.; Yang, H.; Kim, S.C.; Gu, D.R.; Ryuk, J.A.; Jang, S.A.; Ha, H. Ethanol Extract of Radix Asteris Suppresses Osteoclast Differentiation and Alleviates Osteoporosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, C. Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases Play Essential but Contrasting Roles in Osteoclast Differentiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sandor, L.F.; Ragacs, R.; Gyori, D.S. Local Effects of Steroid Hormones within the Bone Microenvironment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 17482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chakraborty, S.; Pramanik, J.; Mahata, B. Revisiting steroidogenesis and its role in immune regulation with the advanced tools and technologies. Genes. Immun. 2021, 22, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Slominski, A.T.; Mahata, B.; Raman, C.; Bereshchenko, O. Editorial: Steroids and Secosteroids in the Modulation of Inflammation and Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 825577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sandor, L.F.; Huh, J.B.; Benko, P.; Hiraga, T.; Poliska, S.; Dobo-Nagy, C.; Simpson, J.P.; Homer, N.Z.M.; Mahata, B.; Gyori, D.S. De novo steroidogenesis in tumor cells drives bone metastasis and osteoclastogenesis. Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 113936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Seeman, E.; Martin, T.J. Antiresorptive and anabolic agents in the prevention and reversal of bone fragility. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2019, 15, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Győri, D.S. Research on Bone Cells in Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8758. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168758

AMA Style

Győri DS. Research on Bone Cells in Health and Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(16):8758. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168758

Chicago/Turabian Style

Győri, Dávid S. 2024. "Research on Bone Cells in Health and Disease" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 16: 8758. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168758

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop