Next Article in Journal
Hot Spots of Site-Specific Integration into the Sinorhizobium meliloti Chromosome
Previous Article in Journal
Nimodipine Used with Vincristine: Protects Schwann Cells and Neuronal Cells from Vincristine-Induced Cell Death but Increases Tumor Cell Susceptibility
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Knockdown of Adenosine 5′-Triphosphate-Dependent Caseinolytic Protease Proteolytic Subunit 6 Enhances Aluminum Tolerance in Peanut Plants (Arachis hypogea L.)

1
College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
2
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agro-Products Safety, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
3
Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Tillage, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(19), 10416; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251910416
Submission received: 22 August 2024 / Revised: 18 September 2024 / Accepted: 23 September 2024 / Published: 27 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)

Abstract

:
Aluminum (Al3+) toxicity in acidic soils reduces root growth and can lead to a considerable reduction in peanut plants (Arachis hypogea L.). The caseinolytic protease (Clp) system plays the key role in abiotic stress response. However, it is still unknown whether it is involved in peanut response to Al3+ stress. The results from this study showed that Adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP)-dependent caseinolytic protease proteolytic subunit 6 (AhClpP6) in peanut plants was involved in the Al3 stress response through its effects on leaf photosynthesis. The AhClpP6 expression levels in the leaf and stem significantly increased with the Al3+ treatment times. Knockdown AhClpP6 peanut lines accumulated significantly more Al3+ when exposed to Al3+ stress, which reduced leaf photosynthesis. Furthermore, in response to Al3+ treatment, knockdown of AhClpP6 resulted in a flattened shape of chloroplasts, disordered and flattened thylakoid, and accumulating more starch grains than those of the wild-type (WT) peanut lines. Taken together, our results suggest that AhClpP6 regulates Al3+ tolerance by maintaining chloroplast integrity and enhancing photosynthesis.

1. Introduction

Aluminum (Al) in acidic soils reduces agricultural production across the globe [1]. Defensive measures taken by plants against Al3+ toxicity include the exudation of organic acid by roots to chelate soil Al ions [2]. Toxic Al3+ is released when the soil pH < 5 and can inhibit root elongation [3,4]. The main site affected by Al3+ toxicity is the root-apex transition zone (TZ), and the growth further seriously limits the nutrient and water uptake of roots [5]. The rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedling root system is sensitive to changes in Al concentration, and this is manifested as obvious root growth inhibition, shortening of the roots, deepening of the root color, abnormal root tips, and root-crown detachment [6]. Al3+ treatment on the soybean (Glycine max L.) significantly inhibited root elongation, with an increase in larger plasma membrane permeability [7].
Al3+ toxicity also affects the aboveground parts of plants. Under acidic conditions, Al3+ toxicity led to increased leaf temperature, chlorophyll degradation, and limited CO2 assimilation [8]. Al3+ stress decreased the net photosynthesis rates and increased the intercellular CO2 concentration in Al-sensitive alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) [9]. A large amount of Al3+ (7.31 mg/g) could be transferred from the root to the aged leaves with 1.5 mg/L Al3+, which resulted in dissolving the leaf thylakoid lamellae and disintegrating the chloroplasts [10]. Pereira et al. [11] found that the Al3+-induced inhibition of photosynthesis caused damage to the thylakoid structure, which affected the photosynthetic transport of electrons in Citrus leaves.
The caseinolytic protease (Clp) system is crucial for plant growth and development, likely facilitating the degradation of numerous chloroplast proteins, including misfolded proteins, protein aggregates, and potentially smaller proteins and peptides [12]. The Clp system is involved in chloroplast homeostasis [13] during the degradation of partially accumulated complexes and damaged proteins [14,15]. Halperin et al. [16] found that each subunit has a unique function in the Clp complex in pea (Pisum sativum) chloroplasts. ClpC1 mutants exhibited significant defects in chloroplast proteostasis, resulting in markedly reduced growth and pigment levels and increased accumulation of chloroplast and cytosolic chaperones. ClpC2 mutants were susceptible to inhibition of chloroplast translation by lincomycin [17].
Clp also plays an important role in stress. Suppressing the expression of ClpB3 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii could decrease accumulation of the ribosomal subunit PRPL1 and increase the stromal protease DEG1C during heat stress [18]. Overexpression of ZnJClpB1-C in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) exhibited a significantly higher chlorophyll content, thereby significantly improving tolerance to heat stress [19]. Knockout of OsClpP6 in rice (Oryza sativa L.) increased the resistance of rice to brown planthoppers by enhancing the level of brown-planthopper-induced jasmonic acid, jasmonic acid-isoleucine, and abscisic acid [20]. However, there have been relatively few studies on the roles played by Clp in response to Al3+ stress.
The peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) is a globally important economic crop due to its high oil (45–55%) and protein content (20–35%) [21]. However, in recent decades, peanut yields have decreased by about 15% as a result of soil acidification of croplands of South China [22]. Here, to explore this issue, we cloned the peanut gene AhClpP6, which encodes the ATP-dependent caseinolytic protease proteolytic subunit 6, and investigated its role in the tolerance of peanut plants to Al3+ toxicity. The hypothesis was that AhClpP6 mediated, at least in part, chloroplast integrity under Al3+ stress, thereby changing photosynthetic efficiency.

2. Results

2.1. Phylogenetic Analysis of AhClpP6

Data obtained from the phylogenetic analysis of AhClpP6 using MEGA 7.0 software revealed that peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) AhClpP6 is most similar to that of Arachis ipaensis ClpP6 (XP_016187025.1) and Arachis stenosperma ClpP6 (XP_057751216.1) (Figure 1). In contrast, AhClpP6 had the lowest phylogenetic relationship with Vigna radiata var. radiata ClpP6 (XP_014491784.1), Vigna angularisj ClpP6 (XP_017432257.1), Vigna angularisj ClpP6 (XP_052734245.1), Vigna unguiculata ClpP6 (XP_027909384.1), and Vigna unguiculata Clp (QCD88533.1). The family relationships with Glycine soja Clpp6 (XP_028195514.1), Glycine max Clpp6 (XP_003541065.1), Glycine max ClpP6 (XP_003537887.1), and Cajanus cajan ClpP6 (XP_020217353.1) were also relatively distant. The relationship between Arachis duranensis ClpP6 (XP_015952034.1) and AhClpP6 was closer than that between Stylosanthes scabra ClpP6 (MED6193296.1) and Stylosanthes scabra ClpP6 (MED6204139.1).

2.2. AhClpP6 Expression Increased with Al3+ Stress in Peanut Plants

As shown in Figure 2A, the highest expression levels of AhClpP6 were in peanut leaves and stems. The AhClpP6 expression levels in the leaves and stems significantly increased with Al3+ treatment time in the wild type (WT, Figure 2B,C). Furthermore, the highest expression levels, which were 4.43 and 5.03, respectively, occurred at 48 h after treatment, suggesting that AhClpP6 is modulated during the Al3+ stress response.

2.3. Sequencing and Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes

The AhClpP6 sequence and RNA-seq data were analyzed to elucidate the biological functions of AhClpP6 in plant growth and development. Expression profiling was conducted using RNA-seq datasets for leaves from the WT and VIGS-AhClpP6 lines. The overlapping DEGs between the differential analysis groups are shown in a Venn diagram (Figure 3). The DEGs across different cultivars and time points were compared, and four groups of DEGs were identified, with the VIGS-AhClpP6_0h vs. WT_0h group having the largest number of DEGs. A Venn diagram was used to determine the overlapping DEGs across the four differential analysis groups. A comparison of the WT and VIGS-AhClpP6 lines at different time points under Al3+ stress showed that there were 5926 DEGs across the four groups, with 6 DEGs common to all four groups. These findings indicate that gene silencing of AhClpP6 has a more significant impact on DEGs than Al3+ stress alone.

2.4. GO and KEGG Annotation of DEGs

A GO function annotation and enrichment analysis was conducted to further explore the functions of the DEGs. The GO terms with a p-value ≤ 0.05 were considered to have been significantly enriched. The GO analysis (Figure 4) revealed that the DEGs encompassed a broad spectrum of biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions, which were classified into 15, 11, and 7 biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions categories in the WT_48h vs. WT_0h group, respectively; 18, 10, and 9 categories in the VIGS-AhClpP6_48h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_0h group; 21, 13, and 10 categories in the WT_0h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_0h group; and 22, 15, and 10 categories in the WT_48h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_48h group, respectively. Among biological processes, the largest categories were cellular processes and metabolic processes, while catalytic activity and binding were the predominant categories in molecular functions across all four groups. Cellular component genes were predominantly associated with the membrane and cell in the WT_48h vs. WT_0h group, and with the membrane and membrane parts in the remaining three groups.
A KEGG pathway analysis was also performed to assess the biological roles of the DEGs (Figure 5). The top three pathways in the VIGS-AhClpP6_48h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_0h group were circadian rhythm-plant, flavonoid biosynthesis, and isoflavonoid biosynthesis; the top three pathways for the WT_0h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_0h group were photosynthesis, photosynthesis-antenna proteins, and protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum; the top pathways in the WT_48h vs. WT_0h group were ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis, photosynthesis-antenna proteins, and photosynthesis; and the top pathways in the WT_48h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_48h group were photosynthesis-antenna proteins, photosynthesis, and porphyrin metabolism. A total of 232 DEGs related to photosynthesis and chloroplast development were identified. Of these, 222 DEGs were concurrently detected in both the WT_0h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_0h and WT_48h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_48h groups, with 59 DEGs showing significant expression changes in both groups. Collectively, these results suggest that Al3+ stress significantly affects leaf photosynthesis and chloroplast development in AhClpP6 knockdown seedlings.
Based on previous results of KEGG pathway enrichment, 90 genes whose pathway is photosynthesis and photosynthesis-antenna proteins were selected (Figure 6). Among the 90 DEGs, there were 36 upregulated genes (0.002 ≤ log2fold-change ≤ 0.535) and 54 downregulated genes (−0.88 ≤ log2fold-change ≤ −0.0007) in WT_0h compared with WT_48h; 90 upregulated genes (0.05 ≤ log2fold-change ≤ 3.43) in VIGS-AhClpP6_0h compared with WT_0h; 16 upregulated genes (0.03 ≤ log2fold-change ≤ 1.13) and 74 downregulated genes (−3.87 ≤ log2fold-change ≤ −0.03) in VIGS-AhClpP6_0h compared with VIGS-AhClpP6_48h; 88 upregulated genes (0.27 ≤ log2fold-change ≤ 6.57) and 2 downregulated genes (−0.22 ≤ log2fold-change ≤ −0.13) in VIGS-AhClpP6_48h compared with WT_48h. In particular, two chlorophyll a-b binding protein of LHCII type 1 genes (LOC112803007 and LOC112751942) were most significantly upregulated both in VIGS-AhClpP6_0h vs. WT_0h, with log2fold-change ranging from 2.73 to 3.43, and VIGS-AhClpP6_48h compared with WT_48h, with log2fold-change ranging from 4.81 to 6.57. But these two genes were not significantly downregulated in WT_0h compared with WT_48h, with log2fold-change ranging from −0.78 to −0.72, while being significantly downregulated in VIGS-AhClpP6_0h compared with VIGS-AhClpP6_48h, with log2fold-change ranging from −3.87 to −2.85.

2.5. AhClpP6 Positively Regulates Al3+ Tolerance by Modulating Photosynthesis

Knockdown AhClpP6 lines (VIGS-AhClpP6 lines) were produced to investigate the function of AhClpP6 in peanut plants (Figure 7A). AhClpP6 transcription was significantly lower in the leaves from most of the pTRV:AhClpP6 seedling lines compared to the WT plants (Figure 7B). When exposed to Al3+ stress, the hematoxylin staining intensity was clearly stronger, and the root tips accumulated significantly more Al3+ in the AhClpP6 knockdown seedlings than in the WT seedlings (Figure 7C). Furthermore, VIGS-AhClpP6 root tips accumulated significantly (1.3-fold) more Al3+ than the WT seedlings when they were exposed to Al3+ (Figure 7D). These results demonstrate that AhClpP6 positively affects peanut tolerance to Al3+ stress.
Photosynthesis decreased after 24 h of Al3+ treatment in the WT seedlings, but this decrease was significantly greater in the AhClpP6 knockdown lines (VIGS-AhClpP6) (Figure 8). The net photosynthetic rate, the Fv/Fm value, and the ETRmax for the VIGS-AhClpP6 lines were significantly lower than those for the WT, which was consistent with their chlorotic appearance. The net photosynthetic rates for both the WT and VIGS-AhClpP6 lines were also significantly lower after Al3+ treatment. The PSII photochemical efficiency and the ETRmax values for the leaves from the WT and VIGS-AhClpP6 lines were also significantly inhibited after Al3+ stress. Furthermore, compared to the control plants, Al3+ treatment decreased the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance by 44% and 53% in the AhClpP6 mutant lines, respectively. In summary, these results suggest that AhClpP6 positively affects photosynthesis. The above results show that AhClpP6 enhances peanut Al3+ tolerance by upregulating photosynthesis.

2.6. AhClpP6 Positively Regulates Chloroplast Integrity

The chloroplast ultrastructure in the leaves and stems was observed (Figure 9 and Figure 10). The chloroplasts in the WT leaves and stems had the expected morphology and a well-structured thylakoid, but the chloroplasts in VIGS-AhClpP6 seedlings showed dramatic changes, with flattened and disordered chloroplasts (Figure 9 and Figure 10). Moreover, chloroplasts in the +Al treatment accumulated more starch grains than those in the −Al treatment in leaves of VIGS-AhClpP6 lines than those of WT (Figure 9). In the Al3+ stress stage, the lamellar system accommodated to the flattened shape of the chloroplasts. Taken together, the results indicate that AhClpP6 positively affects peanut tolerance to Al3+ stress by maintaining chloroplast integrity.

3. Discussion

The mechanisms of Al3+ toxicity from acidic soils are important issues in crop yield and productivity. Recent studies have revealed that chloroplast proteases play an important role in plant adaptation to abiotic stresses by remodeling the chloroplast proteome [23]. In this study, we found that AhClpP6 positively regulates Al3+ tolerance by maintaining chloroplast integrity and controlling photosynthesis, which provided novel insights into the molecular mechanism of plant tolerance to Al3+ stress.
AhClpP6 expression at the transcriptional level in peanut stems and leaves increased under Al3+ treatment, with significant upregulation observed at 48 h (Figure 2). This may be due to the time required for Al ions to be transported from the root tips to the leaves and stems. VIGS-AhClpP6 peanut lines displayed inhibited growth under normal conditions, indicating that AhClpP6 protease is vital for plant growth. A similar result was obtained from Arabidopsis thaliana. Chloroplasts in the inner leaves of ClpP6 antisense lines had poorly developed thylakoid membrane networks and reduced overall membrane contents [24]. AhClpP6 displayed a positive effect on Al3+ tolerance in peanut plants (Figure 7), suggesting it was essential for the development of this early Al3+ response. Additionally, the annotated gene function analysis showed that 232 DEGs were associated with chloroplast development and photosynthesis. These findings suggest that the positive effects of AhClpP6 on peanut plants exposed to Al3+ stress may be related to photosynthesis and chloroplast growth.
A previous study has also found that Al3+ absorption by chloroplasts induces the expression of certain genes in the chloroplast genome, including those related to membrane-bound ATP-independent proteases, which play a critical role in tolerance mechanisms [25]. In this study, under normal conditions, the net photosynthetic rate, Fv/Fm, and ETR values for the WT seedlings were higher than those for the VIGS-AhClpP6 seedlings, indicating that AhClpP6 knockdown negatively impacts photosynthesis in peanut leaves. Under Al3+ stress, the reductions in net photosynthetic rate, Fv/Fm, and ETRmax were significantly greater in the VIGS-ClpP6 plants than in the WT plants, which may lead to a decrease in the accumulation of organic substances in peanuts. In addition, the decrease in Fv/Fm indicates a decline in PSII efficiency, and the reduction in ETRmax reflects a drop in the maximum photosynthetic rate. These characteristics suggest that AhClpP6 positively affects photosynthesis in peanut leaves and that this impact is further enhanced under Al3+ stress. In a similar study, using high Al3+ conditions limited CO2 assimilation and thus decreased photosynthesis [8]. Interestingly, evidence suggested that drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) potentially resulted in Al3+ tolerance due to the changes in leaf growth and metabolic and physiological adjustments [26]. One of the most important physiological responses to drought stress is photosynthesis inhibition [27,28].
Based on these results, we hypothesized that AhClpP6 could be required in chloroplast homeostasis under Al3+ stress. Therefore, the chloroplast ultrastructure of leaves and stems from the AhClpP6 knockdown peanut lines was further observed. The chloroplasts in the VIGS-AhClpP6 peanut seedlings were smaller and more flattened and disordered than those in the WT with or without Al treatment (Figure 9 and Figure 10). Taken together, it is proposed that the integrity and order of chloroplasts may have been related to the better performance of peanut plants under Al3+ stress, which represents a high potential in coordinating with photosynthesis and therefore enhances plant tolerance under Al3+ exposure, and AhClpP6 appears to play an indispensable role in this process. AhClpP6 may be utilized in generating genetically engineered crops with enhanced resistance to Al3+ stress.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) Cultivation and Al3+ Treatment

Seeds from the peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) cultivar ‘Zhonghua-12’ were incubated in wet perlite under dark conditions at 26 ± 2 °C for approximately 3–4 days. The sprouted seedlings were transferred to Hoagland’s nutrient solution under a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle with a photon flux density of 30–50 µmol/m2/s supplied by daylight fluorescent tubes (Philips Chinese Ltd., Shanghai, China) at 26 ± 2 °C. The Hoagland’s nutrient solution was replaced with fresh nutrient solution at daily intervals until the third true leaf appeared. Then, the seedlings were preconditioned for 1 d in 0.5 mM CaCl2 solution (pH 4.2–4.5) for 24 h and transferred to a 0.5 mM CaCl2 solution that contained 100 μM AlCl3 for 0, 12, 24, or 48 h. Each treatment was repeated three times. Approximately 1 cm long root tips were removed and stored at −80 °C for further analysis.

4.2. Multiple Sequence Alignments and Phylogenetic Analysis

The AhClpP6 members used for the phylogenetic analysis were obtained from the GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, accessed on 10 August 2024) and TAIR (http://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 10 August 2024) databases and were from Arabidopsis thaliana. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA7.0 software and the iTOL v6 online tool (https://itol.embl.de/, accessed on 15 August 2024).

4.3. RT-qPCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted using an Eastep® Super RNA Kit (Promega Biological Products Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. HiScript® II qRT SuperMix (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China), with RNA (500 ng) as a template, was used to synthesize the cDNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An RT-qPCR analysis was performed according to [29], and all primers for PCR amplification were designed using Primer 5.0 software (Table S1). The ubiquitin gene, AhUBQR10 (accession No. EG030441), was used as an internal control to quantify the relative transcript levels in peanut plants [30]. The relative expression of each gene was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method based on data reported by Livak and Schmittgen [29], who used three biological replicates collected from three independent plants.

4.4. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS)

Peanut plants with virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) were produced according to Liao et al. [31]. Briefly, AhClpP6 was amplified from peanut cDNA and ligated into the pTRV2 vector. Then, pTRV1 and the recombinant pTRV2 vectors were transformed into competent cells of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. The positive control was AhPDS (GenBank accession ON513417, peanut phytoene desaturase gene). The peanut seeds were surface-sterilized with 75% (v/v) ethanol for 30 s and 0.1% (v/v) HgCl2 for 5–8 min. They were then washed 4–5 times with sterile water, and their outer seed coats were removed. The naked seeds were scratched with a scalpel and then immersed in inoculation solution (OD600 of 0.8) for 2 h before transfer to Murashige and Skoog solid medium for 2–3 d in darkness at 22–24 °C. The germinated seeds were suspended in Hoagland’s nutrient solution and grown in a growth chamber at 26 ± 2 °C under a 12/12 light/dark cycle.

4.5. RNA-Seq and Transcriptome Analysis

RNA-seq was used to determine the transcriptome data for the VIGS-AhClpP6 peanut plants and WT peanut to further investigate the AhClpP6 response to Al3+ toxicity. The treatment conditions were 100 μM AlCl3 for 48 h. There were four treatments consisting of two culture materials and two treatment conditions. These were Al3+ (WT, normal culture), A2 (WT, Al3+ treatment), B1 (VIGS-AhClpP6 peanut, normal culture), and B2 (VIGS-AhClpP6 peanut, Al3+ treatment), and each group was replicated three times (e.g., A1-1, A1-2, and A1-3).
The differentially expressed genes were analyzed using Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment by the clusterProfiler R package version 2.26.0 (http://github.com/jdstorey/qvalue, accessed on 11 September 2024). Then, TB-tools software v0.665 was used to generate a diagram showing the enriched GO terms. In the Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis, all DEGs were mapped to the GO database (http://www.geneontology.org/, accessed on 20 July 2024), and the number of genes for each GO term was calculated. Then, the hypergeometric test, with a p-value of 0.05 as the criterion, was applied to find the significantly enriched GO terms. A KEGG pathway analysis was performed (https://www.kegg.jp/, accessed on 20 July 2024), with a significance level of p < 0.05. A heatmap was created using the OmicStudio tools v3.6 at https://www.omicstudio.cn/tool (accessed on 11 September 2024).

4.6. Al3+ Tolerance Assay

The effects of different Al3+ treatments on plant root growth were measured in peanut seedlings. The seedlings were cultivated in CaCl2 solution for 24 h and then transferred to 100 μM AlCl3 for 48 h (pH 4.2–4.5). Root growth after Al3+ exposure was determined, and the root tips were stained with hematoxylin according to Yao et al. [32]. Fresh root tips (1.0 ± 0.1 mm) were excised, washed in distilled water for 15 min, and immersed in 0.1% hematoxylin (containing 0.01% KIO3) for 20 min. Then, the samples were rinsed in running water for a further 10 min, and the root tips were observed with a stereo microscope (SZX7, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Al3+ uptake was investigated using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). A total of 1.0 g (Fwt.) of peanut root tips (1.0 ± 0.1 mm) was suspended in 1 mL of 2 M HCl at room temperature for 24 h with occasional shaking and then centrifuged at 12,000× g for 30 min. The transparent solution was analyzed by ICP-OES (Varian700, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

4.7. Photosynthesis and Chl Fluorescence Measurements

A portable GFS-3000 gas exchange and fluorescence system (Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany) was used for the photosynthetic investigations [33]. Three leaves from each peanut plant and three pots from each treatment were measured. Mature and healthy leaves from the main stem (third open leaf from the top of the main stem to the base of the stem) were used for the analysis. The photosynthetic activity measurements were carried out from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. on the final day of treatment. The net assimilation rate was measured using a GFS-3000 system (Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany) after the leaves had been dark-adapted for 30 min.
The maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) and the maximum rate of electron transfer (ETRmax) were measured using a PAM-2500 (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) after 30 min of dark adaptation with dark clips. All measurements were performed between 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. on the final day of treatment, and the functional leaves on the main stem (third open leaf from the top of the main stem to the base of the stem) were measured.

4.8. Transmission Electron Microscopy Observation of Cell Ultrastructure

Tissue samples from the functional leaves and the nearby stems were excised and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 12 h at 4 °C. The samples were rinsed twice with 0.1 m phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 10 min each time, fixed again in 1% osmium acid for 3 h at 4 °C, and washed twice with PBS as described above. After fixation, the segments were dehydrated in ethanol at graded serial concentrations of 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100%, for 20–30 min at each step. The 100% ethanol step was repeated 2–3 times to ensure complete dehydration. The dehydrated segments were rinsed with 100% acetone and then permeated by graded mixtures of acetone and epoxy resin 618 (Beijing Zhongxing Bairui Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) at ratios of 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3. The segments were polymerized stepwise at 37 °C for 12 h, 45 °C for 12 h, and 60 °C for 48 h. Each segment was sectioned at 70 nm by a Leica UC7 ultra-microtome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), double stained using 1% uranyl acetate for 20 min and 1% lead citrate for 7 min at 25 °C, mounted on copper grids, and visualized by a transmission electron microscope (JEOL H7650, Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV (magnification is shown in the picture).

4.9. Statistical Analyses

IBM SPSS Statistics 23 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data analysis. The data were presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significances were determined using Student’s t-test.

5. Conclusions

Overall, Al3+ stress increases the expression of the gene encoding AhClpP6, which is a positive modulator of peanut growth and development. In addition, AhClpP6 promotes photosynthetic efficiency via enhancing the integrity of chloroplasts, thereby positively contributing to Al3+ tolerance in peanut plants. These findings provide a compelling example of how peanut plants enhance the tolerance to exposure to Al3+ stress by the ATP-dependent caseinolytic protease system. Moreover, the results reveal a new mechanism of Al3+ tolerance which may be used to favor breeding for stress tolerance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms251910416/s1.

Author Contributions

Y.S.: Formal analysis, investigation, validation, and writing—original draft. D.Z.: Investigation, formal analysis, and validation. R.L.: Investigation. A.W.: Formal analysis. D.X.: Formal analysis. L.H.: Funding acquisition, formal analysis, resources, and supervision. J.Z.: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, resources, supervision, and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31860334), and Guangxi Science and Technology Major Project (‘Peak Project’ of Modern Characteristic Agriculture, GuikeAA23062004).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data included in this study are available upon request by contacting the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, for sharing the peanut seeds (NCGRC-2023-036).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chauhan, D.K.; Yadav, V.; Vaculík, M.; Gassmann, W.; Pike, S.; Arif, N.; Singh, V.P.; Deshmukh, R.; Sahi, S.; Tripathi, D.K. Aluminum toxicity and aluminum stress-induced physiological tolerance responses in higher plants. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2021, 41, 715–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shetty, R.; Prakash, N.B. Effect of different biochars on acid soil and growth parameters of rice plants under aluminium toxicity. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhan, J.; He, H.; Wang, T.; Wang, A.; Li, C.; He, L.F. Aluminum-induced programmed cell death promoted by AhSAG, a senescence-associated gene in Arachis hypoganea L. Plant Sci. 2013, 210, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yamamoto, Y. Aluminum toxicity in plant cells: Mechanisms of cell death and inhibition of cell elongation. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2019, 65, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kochian, L.V.; Hoekenga, O.A.; Pineros, M.A. How do cropplants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance andphosphorous efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 459–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pradhan, A.K.; Shandilya, Z.M.; Sarma, P.; Bora, R.K.; Regon, P.; Vemireddy, L.N.R.; Tanti, B. Concurrent effect of aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency in the root growth of aluminum tolerant and sensitive rice cultivars. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2023, 45, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yu, H.N.; Liu, P.; Wang, Z.Y.; Chen, W.R.; Xu, G.D. The effect of aluminum treatments on the root growth and cell ultrastructure of two soybean genotypes. Crop Prot. 2011, 30, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Phukunkamkaew, S.; Tisarum, R.; Pipatsitee, P.; Samphumphuang, T.; Maksup, S.; Cha-Um, S. Morpho-physiological responses of indica rice (Oryza sativa sub. indica) to Aluminum toxicity at seedling stage. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 29321–29331. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng, X.; Fang, T.; Zhao, E.; Zheng, B.; Huang, B.; An, Y.; Zhou, P. Protective roles of salicylic acid in maintaining integrity and functions of photosynthetic photosystems for alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) tolerance to aluminum toxicity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 155, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lin, Q.; Huai, Z.; Riaz, L.; Peng, X.; Wang, S.; Liu, B.; Yu, F.; Ma, J. Aluminum phytotoxicity induced structural and ultrastructural changes in submerged plant Vallisneria natans. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 250, 114484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pereira, W.E.; de Siqueira, D.L.; Martínez, C.A.; Puiatti, M. Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence in four Citrus root stocks under aluminium stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2000, 157, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rowland, E.; Kim, J.; Friso, G.; Poliakov, A.; Ponnala, L.; Sun, Q.; van Wijk, K.J. The CLP and PREP protease systems coordinate maturation and degradation of the chloroplast proteome in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2022, 236, 1339–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Welsch, R.; Zhou, X.; Yuan, H.; Álvarez, D.; Sun, T.; Schlossarek, D.; Yang, Y.; Shen, G.; Zhang, H.; Rodriguez-Concepcion, M.; et al. Clp protease and OR directly control the proteostasis of phytoene synthase, the crucial enzyme for carotenoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Adam, Z.; Clarke, A.K. Cutting edge of chloroplast proteolysis. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Adam, Z.; Rudella, A.; van Wijk, K.J. Recent advances in the study of Clp, FtsH and other proteases located in chloroplasts. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Halperin, T.; Ostersetzer, O.; Adam, Z. ATP-dependent association between subunits of Clp protease in pea chloroplasts. Planta 2001, 213, 614–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. López, B.; Izquierdo, Y.; Cascón, T.; Zamarreño, Á.M.; García-Mina, J.M.; Pulido, P.; Castresana, C. Mutant noxy8 exposes functional specificities between the chloroplast chaperones CLPC1 and CLPC2 in the response to organelle stress and plant defence. Plant Cell Environ. 2024, 47, 2336–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kreis, E.; Niemeyer, J.; Merz, M.; Scheuring, D.; Schroda, M. CLPB3 is required for the removal of chloroplast protein aggregates and thermotolerance in Chlamydomonas. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 3714–3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Panzade, K.P.; Vishwakarma, H.; Padaria, J.C. Heat stress inducible cytoplasmic isoform of ClpB1 from Z. nummularia exhibits enhanced thermotolerance in transgenic tobacco. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 3821–3831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, S.; Ye, M.; Kuai, P.; Chen, L.; Lou, Y. Silencing an ATP-Dependent caseinolytic protease proteolytic subunit gene enhances the resistance of rice to Nilaparvata lugens. Int. J. Mol Sci. 2024, 25, 3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Killi, F.; Beycioğlu, T. Genetic and environmental variability, heritability and genetic advance in pod yield, yield components, oil and protein content of peanut varieties. Turk. J. Field Crops 2022, 27, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, R.K.; Li, J.Y.; Zhou, S.W.; Xu, M.G.; Shen, R.F. Scientific issues and controlling strategies of soil acidification of croplands in China. Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 2018, 33, 160–167. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mamaeva, A.; Taliansky, M.; Filippova, A.; Love, A.J.; Golub, N.; Fesenko, I. The role of chloroplast protein remodeling in stress responses and shaping of the plant peptidome. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 1326–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sjogren, L.L.; Stanne, T.M.; Zheng, B.; Sutinen, S.; Clarke, A.K. Structural and functional insights into the chloroplast ATP-dependent Clp protease in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 2635–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Adamiec, M.; Dobrogojski, J.; Wojtyla, Ł.; Luciński, R. Stress-related expression of the chloroplast EGY3 pseudoprotease and its possible impact on chloroplasts’ proteome composition. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 965143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Siqueira, J.A.; Barros, J.A.S.; Dal-Bianco, M.; Martins, S.C.V.; Magalhães, P.C.; Ribeiro, D.M.; DaMatta, F.M.; Araújo, W.L.; Ribeiro, C. Metabolic and physiological adjustments of maize leaves in response to aluminum stress. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2020, 32, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Perez-Martin, A.; Michelazzo, C.; Torres-Ruiz, J.M.; Flexas, J.; Fernández, J.E.; Sebastiani, L.; Diaz-Espejo, A. Regulation of photosynthesis and stomatal and mesophyll conductance under water stress and recovery in olive trees: Correlation with gene expression of carbonic anhydrase and aquaporins. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 3143–3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bian, Z.; Zhang, X.; Lu, C. Improving drought tolerance by altering the photosynthetic rate and stomatal aperture via green light in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings under drought conditions. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 167, 103844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yao, S.; Zhan, J.; Pan, C.; Xiong, W.; Xiao, D.; Wang, Y.; Shen, H.; Wang, A.; He, L.F. Identification and validation of reference genes for real-time qPCR normalization during Al-induced programmed cell death in peanut. Biol. Plant. 2019, 63, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liao, G.; Luo, S.; Li, X.; Li, A.; Mo, Y.; Wang, A.; Xiao, D.; He, L.F.; Zhan, J. Identification and functional characterization of REGULATORY PARTICLE NONATPASE 1a-like (AhRPN1a-like) in peanuts during aluminum-induced programmed cell death. J. Plant Physiol. 2023, 289, 154079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yao, S.; Huang, W.; Pan, C.; Zhan, J.; He, L.F. Caspase-like proteases regulate aluminum-induced programmed cell death in peanut. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2016, 127, 691–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ye, Q.; Wang, H.; Li, H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve growth, photosynthetic activity, and chlorophyll fluorescence of Vitis vinifera L. cv. ecolly under drought stress. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analyses of the ClpP6 family proteins from peanut plants and other plant species. Red font letters mean AhClpP6 of Arachis ipaensis ClpP6.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analyses of the ClpP6 family proteins from peanut plants and other plant species. Red font letters mean AhClpP6 of Arachis ipaensis ClpP6.
Ijms 25 10416 g001
Figure 2. AhClpP6 expression profile in peanut plants. (A) in root, stem, and leaf tissues. (B,C) in the leaves (B) and stems (C) under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 0, 12, 24, and 48 h. Values show means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results.
Figure 2. AhClpP6 expression profile in peanut plants. (A) in root, stem, and leaf tissues. (B,C) in the leaves (B) and stems (C) under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 0, 12, 24, and 48 h. Values show means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results.
Ijms 25 10416 g002
Figure 3. Venn diagram showing the relationships between different groups of DEGs. WT, the wild-type peanut; VIGS-AhClpP6, knockdown of AhClpP6 in peanut seedlings; 0 h, without Al3+ stress; 48 h, under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 48 h.
Figure 3. Venn diagram showing the relationships between different groups of DEGs. WT, the wild-type peanut; VIGS-AhClpP6, knockdown of AhClpP6 in peanut seedlings; 0 h, without Al3+ stress; 48 h, under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 48 h.
Ijms 25 10416 g003
Figure 4. GO enrichment of DEGs between WT and VIGS-AhClpP6 in response to Al3+ stress. (A) Enriched GO terms for WT_0h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_0h; (B) WT_48h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_48h; (C) WT_0h vs. WT_48h; and (D) VIGS-AhClpP6_0h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_48h. The X-axis represents the number of genes, and the Y-axis represents the functional category.
Figure 4. GO enrichment of DEGs between WT and VIGS-AhClpP6 in response to Al3+ stress. (A) Enriched GO terms for WT_0h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_0h; (B) WT_48h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_48h; (C) WT_0h vs. WT_48h; and (D) VIGS-AhClpP6_0h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_48h. The X-axis represents the number of genes, and the Y-axis represents the functional category.
Ijms 25 10416 g004
Figure 5. KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs between WT and VIGS-AhClpP6 seedlings in response to Al3+ stress. (A) Enriched GO terms for WT_0h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_0h; (B) WT_0h vs. WT_48h; (C) VIGS-AhClpP6_0h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_48h; and (D) WT_48h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_48h. The X-axis represents the rich ratio for the genes, and the Y-axis represents the functional category.
Figure 5. KEGG pathway enrichment of DEGs between WT and VIGS-AhClpP6 seedlings in response to Al3+ stress. (A) Enriched GO terms for WT_0h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_0h; (B) WT_0h vs. WT_48h; (C) VIGS-AhClpP6_0h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_48h; and (D) WT_48h vs. VIGS-AhClpP6_48h. The X-axis represents the rich ratio for the genes, and the Y-axis represents the functional category.
Ijms 25 10416 g005
Figure 6. Heatmap indicating transcriptional levels of WTandVIGS-AhClpP6 seedlings in response to Al3+ stress. The heatmap shows the log10 fold change of each gene.
Figure 6. Heatmap indicating transcriptional levels of WTandVIGS-AhClpP6 seedlings in response to Al3+ stress. The heatmap shows the log10 fold change of each gene.
Ijms 25 10416 g006
Figure 7. Functional characterization of AhClpP6 in peanut plants. (A) Phenotypes of knockdown of AhClpP6 peanut lines (VIGS-AhClpP6); scale bar, 5 cm. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of AhClpP6 expression in peanut leaves; X-axis represents different peanut lines. Peanut lines: 1, WT; 2, empty; 3, positive control; 4–17, VIGS-AhClpP6. (C,D) Effects of Al3+ stress on plant growth. (C) Hematoxylin staining of the root tips; bar, 1 mm. (D) Al3+ uptake in the root tips. −Al means without Al3+ treatment; +Al means under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 48 h. Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results.
Figure 7. Functional characterization of AhClpP6 in peanut plants. (A) Phenotypes of knockdown of AhClpP6 peanut lines (VIGS-AhClpP6); scale bar, 5 cm. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of AhClpP6 expression in peanut leaves; X-axis represents different peanut lines. Peanut lines: 1, WT; 2, empty; 3, positive control; 4–17, VIGS-AhClpP6. (C,D) Effects of Al3+ stress on plant growth. (C) Hematoxylin staining of the root tips; bar, 1 mm. (D) Al3+ uptake in the root tips. −Al means without Al3+ treatment; +Al means under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 48 h. Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results.
Ijms 25 10416 g007
Figure 8. Photosynthesis detection in the peanut AhClpP6 knockdown line under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 48 h. (A) Net photosynthetic rate; (B) chlorophyll fluorescence parameters; (C) maximum electron transport rate (ETRmax); (D) transpiration rate; (E) stomatal conductance. −Al means without Al3+ treatment; +Al means under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 48 h. Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results.
Figure 8. Photosynthesis detection in the peanut AhClpP6 knockdown line under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 48 h. (A) Net photosynthetic rate; (B) chlorophyll fluorescence parameters; (C) maximum electron transport rate (ETRmax); (D) transpiration rate; (E) stomatal conductance. −Al means without Al3+ treatment; +Al means under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 48 h. Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results.
Ijms 25 10416 g008
Figure 9. Microscopic analysis of the effect of the AhClpP6 knockdown line on Al3+-induced chloroplast structure changes in leaves. −Al means without Al3+ treatment; +Al means under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 48 h. Bar, 1 μm. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results. Chl, chloroplast; GL, grana lamellae; O, osmiophilic granule; S, starch grain.
Figure 9. Microscopic analysis of the effect of the AhClpP6 knockdown line on Al3+-induced chloroplast structure changes in leaves. −Al means without Al3+ treatment; +Al means under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 48 h. Bar, 1 μm. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results. Chl, chloroplast; GL, grana lamellae; O, osmiophilic granule; S, starch grain.
Ijms 25 10416 g009
Figure 10. Microscopic analysis of the effect of the AhClpP6 knockdown line on Al3+-induced chloroplast structure changes in stems. −Al means without Al3+ treatment; +Al means under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 48 h. Bar, 500 nm. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results. Chl, chloroplast; GL, grana lamellae; O, osmiophilic granule; S, starch grain.
Figure 10. Microscopic analysis of the effect of the AhClpP6 knockdown line on Al3+-induced chloroplast structure changes in stems. −Al means without Al3+ treatment; +Al means under 100 μM AlCl3 treatment for 48 h. Bar, 500 nm. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. All experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results. Chl, chloroplast; GL, grana lamellae; O, osmiophilic granule; S, starch grain.
Ijms 25 10416 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, Y.; Zhang, D.; Liang, R.; Xiao, D.; Wang, A.; He, L.; Zhan, J. Knockdown of Adenosine 5′-Triphosphate-Dependent Caseinolytic Protease Proteolytic Subunit 6 Enhances Aluminum Tolerance in Peanut Plants (Arachis hypogea L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10416. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251910416

AMA Style

Shi Y, Zhang D, Liang R, Xiao D, Wang A, He L, Zhan J. Knockdown of Adenosine 5′-Triphosphate-Dependent Caseinolytic Protease Proteolytic Subunit 6 Enhances Aluminum Tolerance in Peanut Plants (Arachis hypogea L.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(19):10416. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251910416

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Yusun, Dayue Zhang, Ronghua Liang, Dong Xiao, Aiqin Wang, Longfei He, and Jie Zhan. 2024. "Knockdown of Adenosine 5′-Triphosphate-Dependent Caseinolytic Protease Proteolytic Subunit 6 Enhances Aluminum Tolerance in Peanut Plants (Arachis hypogea L.)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 19: 10416. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251910416

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop