Next Article in Journal
Bioactive Compounds Formulated in Phytosomes Administered as Complementary Therapy for Metabolic Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Lack of Direct Effects of Neurotrophic Factors in an In Vitro Model of Neuroinflammation
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Prenatal and Neonatal Fluoride Exposure to Morphine-Induced Neuroinflammation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms25084161
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Neuroinflammation and Epilepsy: From Pathophysiology to Therapies Based on Repurposing Drugs

by
Pascual Sanz
1,2,*,
Teresa Rubio
1,2,3 and
Maria Adelaida Garcia-Gimeno
4
1
Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Jaime Roig 11, 46010 Valencia, Spain
2
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), 46010 Valencia, Spain
3
Faculty of Health Science, Universidad Europea de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
4
Department of Biotechnology, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y del Medio Natural, Universitat Politécnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(8), 4161; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25084161
Submission received: 18 March 2024 / Revised: 4 April 2024 / Accepted: 8 April 2024 / Published: 9 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuroinflammation: Advancements in Pathophysiology and Therapies)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Neuroinflammation and epilepsy are different pathologies, but, in some cases, they are so closely related that the activation of one of the pathologies leads to the development of the other. In this work, we discuss the three main cell types involved in neuroinflammation, namely (i) reactive astrocytes, (ii) activated microglia, and infiltration of (iii) peripheral immune cells in the central nervous system. Then, we discuss how neuroinflammation and epilepsy are interconnected and describe the use of different repurposing drugs with anti-inflammatory properties that have been shown to have a beneficial effect in different epilepsy models. This review reinforces the idea that compounds designed to alleviate seizures need to target not only the neuroinflammation caused by reactive astrocytes and microglia but also the interaction of these cells with infiltrated peripheral immune cells.

1. Introduction

Neuroinflammation: A General Overview

In general, inflammation is a protective process developed by the organism to maintain its homeostasis. The goal of the inflammatory process is to fight against damage in living cells, by promoting changes to minimize its harmful effect and eventually recovering the homeostatic status. Therefore, inflammation is a positive defensive process to maintain the organism in a healthy state (see [1,2,3] for a review). However, when the cause of the neuroinflammatory reaction is excessive or if it is maintained for a long period of time, inflammation becomes a detrimental process [1,4].
In the brain, neuroinflammation is a response of the innate immune system which is mainly mediated by reactive glia (astrocytes and microglia) that release cytokines, chemokines, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and other proinflammatory mediators [4,5].
The inflammatory process is composed of the following elements:
(1) Inflammatory inducers: These are compounds that initiate inflammatory signaling pathways. We can distinguish between extracellular inducers: pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) (e.g., structural elements found within bacterial and fungal cell walls); intracellular inducers, which are compounds produced by stressed, damaged, or malfunctioning cells and tissues, such as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) (e.g., high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1), histones, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and reactive oxygen species (ROS)) [6]. In neurodegenerative diseases, inflammation may be triggered by the accumulation of aggregates or modified proteins, which could also be considered DAMPs [7].
Recently, a new group of compounds released by alterations in the homeostatic processes has been defined as HAMPs, homeostasis-altering molecular processes (e.g., changes in intracellular ion levels, modification of the actin cytoskeleton, etc.) [5] (Figure 1).
(2) Sensors: These are pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that identify the presence of inflammatory inducers. They can be located at the level of the membrane (e.g., Toll-like receptors (TLRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), etc.) or located in the cytosol (e.g., RIG-1-like receptors (RLRs), nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD), leucine-rich repeat receptors (NLRs), etc.) [5,8]. In [9], we review the components of these pathways.
(3) Effectors: The interaction of inducers with the corresponding sensors triggers the activation of signaling cascades (e.g., mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPKs) and Akt serine/threonine protein kinase (Akt)) by different mechanisms, which—upon the activation of the intermediate elements of the signaling process—ends with the activation of transcriptional factors involved in the production of proinflammatory mediators (e.g., nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) and interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3)). One of the main proinflammatory mediators is NF-kB, which has a strategic position at the crossroads between oxidative stress and inflammation. Neuronal dysfunction is closely associated with the activation of NF-kB and the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (see [9] for a review) (Figure 1).
At the same time as the occurrence of the activation of the inflammatory process, a parallel pathway related to the resolution of inflammation is also activated [10,11]. In this process, the activation of PRRs leads to the transcriptional activation of interferon regulatory factors which limit the spread of the insult in the central nervous system (CNS) and diminishes neurodegeneration. Reactive glia are also involved in this pathway by producing anti-inflammatory compounds such as interleukin 10 (IL-10), arginase, chitinase-3 like protein 1 (CHI3L1), and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein (IL-1Ra), which are neuroprotective. In this way, the inflammatory pathway is counterbalanced by the resolution of the inflammation process to regulate the extent of inflammation [11]. However, if the inflammatory insult persists, there is a sustained recruitment of inflammatory cells at the site of inflammation because of the reduced clearance of affected cells, which—by releasing DAMPs—sustain an inflammatory cascade [5].
In this work, we describe the general pathophysiology of the neuroinflammatory process, with a special emphasis on the relationship between neuroinflammation and epilepsy. Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by a predisposition to epileptic seizures, and is subject to the associated cognitive, psychological, and social consequences [10,12]. Epilepsy affects around 1% of the total global population and it is caused by acquired insults in the brain (e.g., after stroke or traumatic brain injury), infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases, and genetic mutations [10,12]. At present, despite the availability of many anti-seizure medications (ASMs), approximately one-third of patients with epilepsy do not achieve seizure control or soon become resistant to the effects of the ASMs [13]. Consequently, there is a critical need for the development of innovative anti-epileptogenic treatment strategies to either ameliorate the progression or/and limit the detrimental consequences of the disease. Since there are cases where neuroinflammation and epilepsy are comorbid conditions, here, we summarize some examples of repurposing drugs with anti-inflammatory properties that are beneficial in either animal models or patients with epilepsy. In addition, we discuss the three main cell types involved in neuroinflammation, namely (i) reactive astrocytes, (ii) activated microglia, and infiltration of (iii) peripheral immune cells in the central nervous system, and the possible relationship of these cells in some cases of epilepsy.

2. Methodology

This is a narrative review. We used the PubMed database and the following search terms “astrocytes AND neuroinflammation”, “microglia AND neuroinflammation”, “astrocytes AND (seizures OR epilepsy)”, “microglia AND (seizures OR epilepsy)”, “neuroinflammation AND (seizures OR epilepsy)”. We collected outstanding information from the past 5 years (2019–2023), and also critical manuscripts from older years.

3. Cell Types of the CNS Involved in Neuroinflammation

It is considered that the main cell types of the CNS involved in the release of proinflammatory mediators are astrocytes, microglia, and infiltrated peripheral immune cells.

3.1. Astrocytes

Originally defined as the cells that support the function of neurons in the CNS, astrocytes are currently recognized to play key roles in CNS physiology. On the one hand, astrocytes have housekeeping functions: they supply neurons with energy substrates (e.g., lactate, glutamine); they are involved in the uptake of neurotransmitters (e.g., glutamate) to ensure regular synaptic transmission; they regulate ion homeostasis (e.g., K+ ions) and pH; they play a key role in regulating oxidative stress (e.g., by releasing glutathione); and they release growth factors and other trophic molecules (e.g., brain-derived neurotrophic factor, BDNF; glial-derived neurotrophic factor, GDNF; epidermal growth factor, EGF; transforming growth factor beta, TGF-beta). On the other hand, astrocytes have a key role in the assistance and maintenance of the synapses, being involved in the formation of new synapses as well as in the elimination of non-functional ones by phagocytosis (synaptic pruning) (see [14,15] for a review) (Figure 2).
However, under stress conditions, astrocytes suffer a progressive change in morphology and gene expression by a process called reactive astrogliosis. In this process, astrocytes lose their supportive functions and acquire others related to the expression of characteristic cellular markers (e.g., glial fibrillary acidic protein, GFAP; vimentin) and to the secretion of proinflammatory mediators (e.g., cytokines, chemokines; see below), which could induce neuronal death (see [15,16] for a review). Reactive astrocytes also release lipoproteins containing apolipoprotein E (APOE) and apolipoprotein J (APOJ) proteins and toxic lipids (saturated long-chain fatty acids and very long chain fatty acids), which trigger an endoplasmic reticulum stress response in neurons, with the concomitant activation of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring protein 1 (IRE1), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) signaling pathways and the activation of pro-apoptotic mediators (e.g., CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP), p53 up-regulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) and caspase 3), leading to neuronal cell death by apoptosis [17] (Figure 2).
Due to the loss of their functional properties, reactive astrocytes fail in the maintenance of different homeostatic systems, which could lead to hyperexcitability. They have altered K+ and water homeostasis, since they have decreased levels of the inward rectifying channel Kir4.1, which transports K+ inside the cells, accompanied by reduced water entry through the aquaporin channel AQP4. This dysfunction leads to excessive extracellular K+, which predisposes people to seizures (reviewed in [18,19,20]) (Figure 2).
Reactive astrocytes also have reduced glutamate uptake due to alterations in the expression of the glutamate transporter genes or post-transcriptional and/or post-translational modifications of the corresponding proteins [21]. Due to this dysfunction, there is an increase in the levels of glutamate in the synaptic cleft that activates the glutamate receptors which are present in the post-synaptic neurons (N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA), α-amino-3-hidroxi-5-methyl-4-isoxazolpropionic acid (AMPA), Kainate, and metabotropic glutamate (mGLUR) receptors), leading to excitotoxicity. Moreover, reactive astrocytes enhance their expression of these glutamate receptors, which worsens the hyperexcitability [19]. In addition, the release of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1b) by reactive astrocytes aggravate excitotoxicity since, on the one hand, these molecules stimulate the release of glutamate from these cells, and on the other hand, these cytokines increase the functionality of post-synaptic neuronal glutamate receptors (e.g., by enhancing the phosphorylation and activation of subunits of the NMDA receptor, and by increasing the surface expression of AMPA receptors) (reviewed in [20,22]) (Figure 2). These effects could explain the relationship between reactive astrocytes and hyperexcitability.
Reactive astrocytes have reduced expression of glutamine synthase (reviewed in [23,24]). This enzyme transforms glutamate into glutamine, which is transported to neurons to provide a substrate for the synthesis of glutamate or gamma amino butyric acid (GABA), depending on the type of neuron. If the production of glutamine is reduced, then neurons will suffer a shortage of glutamine that will affect—more importantly—the inhibitory GABAergic neurons, which will not produce GABA, leading to hyperexcitability [20] (Figure 2).
Changes in adenosine metabolism are also produced in reactive astrocytes. These cells increase the expression of adenosine kinase, which converts adenosine into adenosine monophosphate (AMP), in this way lowering the levels of free adenosine, which has anti-seizure properties [13,25].
Reactive astrocytes have also dysfunctional energetic metabolism. Due to a decrease in glutamate uptake, there is a decrease in the production of energy from this amino acid by the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), leading to a shortage in energy production and mitochondrial dysfunction. This leads to increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress, which is detrimental to the neurons [20,21] (Figure 2).
Reactive astrocytes have an activated NF-kB signaling pathway that ends with the expression of proinflammatory mediators such as cytokines (e.g., TNF, IL-6, IL-1b, Lipocalin 2), chemokines (e.g., CCL2, CCL5, CXCL10), and components of the complement cascade (e.g., C1q, C3), which enhances synaptic pruning and neuronal cell death [26,27]. On the other hand, astrocytes are the target of different inflammatory ligands that act on specific pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and NOD-type receptors (NLRs). In relation to epilepsy, the most important ones are IL-1R1 (receptor of IL-1b), TLR2, TLR3, and TLR4 (receptors of HMGB1 and LPS), which—through the activation of NF-kB—activate the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2), IL-6, TNF, CCL2, and CXCL10, among other proinflammatory mediators (reviewed in [20,28]) (Figure 2).
At the same time, astrocytes produce neuroprotective molecules such as the IL-1R1 antagonist IL-1Ra and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-13, and IL-10) [29]. They also produce microRNAs (miRNAs) associated with a downregulation of the TLR signaling pathways (miRNA-146a and miRNA-147b), leading to an anti-inflammatory effect [28]. This may sound counterintuitive, but in this way, the initial inflammatory process can be balanced to recover homeostasis.
In summary, the presence of metabolic failure, oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, and inflammation—as a consequence of astrocyte reactivity—contributes to the appearance of hyperexcitability. Recently, an astrocytic basis for epilepsy has been proposed, and results in both animal models and human samples indicate that astrocyte dysfunction can participate in hyperexcitation, neurotoxicity, and seizure spreading [30]. Perhaps this is the reason why the European Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) recognized the role that glia and inflammation may have in the development of seizures and epileptogenesis as a top research priority, and encouraged the identification of glial targets as a basis for the development of more specific anti-seizure medications (ASMs) [31]. This reinforces the role of astrocytes as epileptogenic drivers in acquired epilepsies [20,32].

3.2. Microglia

Microglia are the main component of the innate immune system in the CNS. They patrol around the CNS and are the first to respond to even small changes that affect the CNS. They are activated by different conditions such as the release of ATP from neuronal death cells or the presence of high levels of glutamate, among other insults [33]. This activation leads to a change in their morphology, where they become more rounded and less ramified [34].
In general, microglial activation occurs in advance of astrocyte reactivity [35], although there are some cases where astrocytes become reactive in the absence of activated microglia [36]. Microglia release IL1a, TNF, and C1q, which induce the acquisition of the reactive phenotype in the astrocytes [26,27]. In addition, microglial TNF induces the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM1) in endothelial cells, favoring the infiltration of peripheral immune cells, which—by the production of more cytokines and chemokines—aggravates neuroinflammation (see below) [37].
The main functions of microglia in the CNS are the release of cytokines and chemokines, the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells, and the control of synapsis; in addition, they modulate neuronal activity and maintain a cross-talk with astrocytes (see below) [35,38,39]. Upon activation, microglia acquire a neurotoxic profile and release nitric oxide (NO), ROS, cytokines (IL-1b, IL-18, IL-6, TNF, IL-1a), chemokines (CCL2, CCL5), complement proteins (C1q), and proinflammatory miRNAs (e.g., miRNA155). However, under moderate activation, microglia have a neuroprotective role by the release of anti-inflammatory mediators, such as Arg1, IL-4, IL-10, TGF-beta, CCL17, interferon growth factor 1 (IGF-1), GDNF, BDNF, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (reviewed in [29,40,41]).
Microglia plays a main role in the regulation of synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis. In conjunction with astrocytes, they participate in the removal of weaker synapses. They recognize complement molecules such as C3 and C1q, which are located on the surface of affected synapsis, acting as “eat-me” signals. Under inflammatory conditions, there is an increase in the levels of C3 and C1q, which leads to an increase in synaptic pruning, which is associated with neurodegeneration [42]. In patients with epilepsy, an increase in the levels of C1q in affected areas has been reported (see [43,44,45], for a review).

3.3. Microglia–Astrocyte Crosstalk

As indicated above, there is a bidirectional communication between microglia and astrocytes [39]. Microglia induce astrocyte activation and determine the fate of astrocytes, and astrocytes may trigger microglial activation and control their cellular function (reviewed in [34,46]).
On the one hand, microglia secrete factors that affect astrocyte physiology. Upon acute neuronal hyperactivity and activation of glutamate–NMDA receptors, neurons release ATP, which stimulates microglial purinergic receptors (P2Y12) and triggers the secretion of proinflammatory inducers (e.g., IL-1b, IL-6, TNF, NO), which affect the immune functions of the astrocytes. These inducers are sensed by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) in the astrocytes, which promote the production of inflammatory factors (cytokines, chemokines, and complement components), which amplify the inflammatory response [46,47]. One of the best-known examples of the microglia-derived activation of astrocytes is the release of TNF, IL-1a, and C1q, which induce the astrocytic neurotoxic phenotype [26,27]. Microglia also negatively affects the expression and activity of astrocytic glutamate transporters (GLT-1 and GLAST) [46]. Moreover, microglia induce the release of glutamate from the astrocytes, worsening the excitotoxicity produced by the accumulation of glutamate in the synaptic cleft [48]. At the same time, microglia also secrete anti-inflammatory compounds (TGF-alpha, IL-4, IL-10) which alleviate astrocyte reactivity [48] (Figure 3).
On the other hand, astrocytes secrete factors that affect microglia physiology. Astrocytes produce lipocalin-2 (Lcn2), which is a critical contributor to the inflammatory activation of astrocytes and enhances microglial activity under inflammatory and pathological conditions of the CNS [46]. Astrocytes also produce glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), which increases microglial activation and neuroinflammation. In addition, astrocytes regulate microglial migration and phagocytosis; they produce complement factor C3, which regulates microglial phagocytosis, and the chemokines CCL2 and CXCL10 which recruit microglia to the damaged area to eliminate damaged cells and cellular debris [41,46]. In parallel, astrocytes also release anti-inflammatory mediators such as orosomucoid-2 (ORM2), and TGF-beta, which prevent microglial activation [48] (Figure 3).
In several forms of epilepsy, there is a higher reactivity of microglia in the cornus ammonis CA3 and CA1 areas of the hippocampus, which is associated with higher neuronal death and hyperexcitability (reviewed in [38,49,50]). It has been assumed that microglia are activated rapidly after a seizure. Activated microglia, on the one hand, releases proinflammatory cytokines and toxic compounds (e.g., reactive oxygen species, ROS; nitric oxide, NO); on the other hand, they have dysfunctional phagocytosis and defective proteostasis, which is detrimental for neuronal function (see [51,52,53] for a review). At the same time, microglia induce the subsequent activation of astrocytes, which develops slowly but is maintained with time, contributing to the pathology of epilepsy by the mechanisms described above [53]. In addition to this sequence of events, it has also been reported that astrocytes, per se, can drive seizures without the participation of activated microglia [36].

3.4. Peripheral Immune Cells Infiltration into the CNS

The CNS is no longer an immune-privileged organ since there is a substantial crosstalk between cells of the central and the peripheral immune system. Although inflammation in the CNS starts with the activation of microglia and/or astrocytes, treatments aimed at suppressing microglia/astrocyte activation are not enough to prevent neuroinflammation; thus, a more comprehensive approach that includes the peripheral immune system is necessary [54]. Cells from the peripheral immune system release cytokines which can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) to cause neurotoxicity and to activate microglia and astrocytes. In addition, dysregulated signaling between astrocytes, endothelial cells, and pericytes may cause the BBB to become permeable, allowing the invasion of peripheral immune cells into the CNS; they can gain access to the brain by diapedesis once a recruitment signal (e.g., release of chemokines) has been produced. It is important to note that infiltration can occur without an overt opening of the BBB (see [54,55,56] for a review).
The main peripheral immune cells that infiltrate the brain are neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages, B-cells, and T-cells. A temporal trend in the infiltration of peripheral immune cells in the brain has been described, in which neutrophils seem to be the first and then they dissipate. The second type of cells is monocytes/macrophages; they are recruited by the release of cytokines/chemokines by the astrocytic endfeet, endothelial cells, and pericytes. The chemokine CCL2 is a potent chemoattractant for cells of the monocytic lineage, which express the corresponding CCR2 receptor. The activation of this receptor induces a signal transducer and an activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)-dependent transcriptional activation of proinflammatory mediators, aggravating neuroinflammation. The third type of cells are the T-cells, which last longer in the brain parenchyma [57]; among the T-cells, the most abundant ones are CD4+ (T-helper Th cells, comprising proinflammatory Th-1 cells, anti-inflammatory Th-2 cells (Th17)—involved in the recruitment of neutrophils—and Treg cells, playing a role in immunosuppression), CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, involved in destroying damaged cells, and gamma delta T-cells (see [37,54,58] for a review). T-cells are attracted to the endothelium by the presence of chemokines (CCL2 and CCL5), which interact with the CCR2 and CCR5 receptors present in the T-cells. Then, T-cells attach to the endothelium through a combination of specific adhesion molecules named selectins (P-selectin, VCAM1, ICAM1)—in the case of endothelial cells—and specific selectin ligands that are expressed in T cells. Then, T-cells produce interferon-gamma (IFNg), which induces the production of proinflammatory mediators by macrophages, and also the chemokine CXCL10, which enhances the recruitment of Th-1 cells [37,58]. In the case of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, by recognizing specific antigens, they release granzymes and perforins, forming pores on the membranes of target cells and inducing apoptosis. The presence of CD8+ T cells is considered a worse outcome of the neuroinflammatory disease [37,58].
In relation to epilepsy, it has been reported that the infiltration of neutrophils is involved in the induction of acute brain inflammation after status epilepticus, and seizure frequency correlates with the number of infiltrating monocytes [56]. Infiltration of CD8+ T-cells has been detected in epileptogenic areas, and it is considered that the greater infiltration of CD8+ T-cells in the CA1 region of the hippocampus shows a greater positive correlation with neuronal loss in the area (reviewed in [59,60]) (Figure 4).

4. Neuroinflammation and Epilepsy

As has been described above, there is a direct relationship between neuroinflammation and epilepsy: brain inflammation has a role in the etiopathogenesis of seizures, and seizures cause neuroinflammation (reviewed in [10,61,62]). This notion is supported by different pieces of evidence: (i) inflammation is induced by recurrent seizures; (ii) the release of proinflammatory cytokines contributes to cell loss; (iii) seizure-induced brain inflammation is long-lasting and can persist for days; (iv) inflammation precedes the onset of spontaneous seizures, suggesting that uncontrolled inflammation may contribute to the development of the epileptic process; (v) treatment with specific anti-inflammatory agents reduces experimental seizures [10,61,62].
One form of triggering inflammation is the release of DAMPs (ATP, HMGB1, other compounds) from the dead cells due to seizures. These mediators trigger the inflammatory response in microglia and astrocytes in the brain parenchyma; then, the infiltration of peripheral immune cells may trigger a sustained inflammatory cascade [63]. Neuroinflammation may also occur without neuronal cell loss because of enhanced neuronal activation (neurogenic inflammation) [64,65,66] (Figure 5).
On the contrary, neuroinflammation may occur before the onset of epilepsy: dysregulation of the glial immune–inflammatory function may predispose or directly contribute to the generation of seizures. As indicated above, astrocyte reactivity leads to different changes in the homeostasis of the glutamate transporters, which leads to hyperexcitability, excitotoxicity, and—eventually—the appearance of seizures [25,62] (Figure 5). For this reason, the use of anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce astrocyte reactivity may have disease-modifying effects in epilepsy. In this way, modulation of specific inflammatory pathways could be a new therapeutic approach for pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsies [3,63].

5. Use of Repurposing Drugs as an Anti-Inflammatory Therapeutic Approach in Epilepsy

Several compounds that target different inflammatory signaling pathways have demonstrated their efficacy in epilepsy models. In ref. [9], we collected some of these compounds: in brief, we defined the beneficial effects of the following: of anakinra and anti-IL-1b monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) in inhibiting the IL1-b/IL-1R1 axis; of BoxA, P5779, and anti-HMGB1 Mabs in inhibiting the TLR4/RAGE axis; of anti-TNF Mabs, dihydrothalidomide, Nilotinib, and cannabinoids in inhibiting the TNF/TNFR1 axis; of anti-IL-6 Mabs and WP1066 in inhibiting the IL-6/Jak-STAT axis; of losartan in inhibiting the TGFbeta axis; of anti-CXCL10 Mabs in inhibiting the CXCL10/CXCR3 axis; and of anti-C1q Mabs and NLY01 in inhibiting microglia activation.
In this work, we focus our attention on some repurposed drugs with anti-inflammatory effects that display a beneficial effect in epilepsy models (see Table 1).

5.1. Metformin

Metformin belongs to the family of biguanide compounds that have glucose-lowering effects. This compound is currently the most commonly prescribed drug for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and is taken by an estimated 150 million people worldwide. Due to its superior safety profile, it has become the first-line treatment for T2D and is now featured on the World Health Organization’s essential medicines list (reviewed in [67,68]). However, metformin has additional benefits on top of its use as an anti-diabetic drug: it is effective in the treatment of multiple diseases, delays the aging process, and alleviates inflammation [67,68]. Recently, the beneficial effects of metformin have also been reported for different neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s [69], Parkinson’s [70], and Huntington’s diseases [71], as well as multiple sclerosis [72], among others [73,74]. Metformin has also been shown to be able to attenuate the generation of seizures by delaying the onset of epilepsy, reducing neuronal loss in the hippocampus, and preventing cognitive impairments in both acute and chronic epilepsy models. Its anti-seizure effects could be attributed to both AMPK-dependent and AMPK-independent mechanisms [75,76].
We used metformin in a mouse model of Lafora disease, a devastating form of progressive myoclonus epilepsy, and showed that it reduces some of the hallmarks of the disease, such as the accumulation of polyglucosans and polyubiquitin aggregates in the brain, and reactive astrogliosis, resulting in improvements in the results of neuropsychological tests [77]. In addition, metformin decreases susceptibility to seizures, reduces the number and length of seizures, and eliminates the mortality induced by the pro-convulsive agent pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) in Lafora disease mouse models [78]. These results allowed the designation of metformin as an orphan drug for the treatment of Lafora disease by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2016 and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017. Importantly, metformin has been used to treat a group of LD patients and showed a beneficial effect by slowing down the progression of the disease [79].

5.2. Fingolimod

Sphingosine-containing phospholipids are prominent signaling molecules in the CNS. One of them, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), signals through a family of G-protein-coupled receptors (S1PR1-5), leading to cytokine production. Fingolimod (FGD) is an antagonist of S1PRs. Due to its immunosuppressant effects, in 2010, the FDA approved its use for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. FGD has multiple actions at the level of the central nervous system (CNS): (i) in endothelial cells, it reduces the permeability of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) by decreasing the expression of ICAM-1 and reducing the binding of leukocytes to endothelial cells; (ii) in neurons, it protects from excitotoxic cell death, preventing apoptosis; (iii) in astrocytes, it inhibits the production of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and neurotoxic substances (e.g., IL-6, COX2, VEGF); it also increases the production of neuroprotective factors; (iv) in microglia, it reduces microglia activation, and also reduces the production of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6); (v) in oligodendrocytes, it promotes the renewal of oligodendrocytes and enhances remyelination. In conclusion, fingolimod reduces inflammation, excitotoxicity, glial activation, and BBB destruction, and improves neurogenesis [80]. In addition, it upregulates the production of neurotrophic factors such as BDNF and reduces the infiltration of T-lymphocytes into the brain parenchyma [81].
FGD’s beneficial effects on different neurological disorders such as stroke [80], hypoxia [82], and epilepsy have been described (reviewed in [83,84,85,86]). Recently, we have described the beneficial effects of FGD in a mouse model of Lafora disease, a particular type of progressive myoclonus epilepsy. In this model, FGD reduced reactive astrogliosis-derived neuroinflammation and T-lymphocyte infiltration, which correlated with an improved behavioral performance among the treated animals [87]. However, in the case of the Rett syndrome, although the administration of fingolimod was safe in children with this disorder, it did not provide supportive evidence for an effect on clinical, laboratory, and imaging measures in these patients [88].

5.3. Dimethyl Fumarate

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an immunomodulatory drug approved by the FDA in 2013 for the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis. It has been reported that DMF activates the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor (Nrf2), having antioxidant effects [89,90]. In addition, DMF reduced the infiltration of peripheral immune cells into the spinal cord in a mouse model of experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE) and in patients with multiple sclerosis [91,92]. DMF also reduces microglial activation (Iba1) and the infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes in the brain, as shown by a rat model of EAE [93]. Recently, it has been described that DMF induces robust anti-inflammatory signaling by activating HCAR2, a G-protein-coupled membrane receptor expressed in immune cells [89]. Related to epilepsy, a beneficial effect of DMF in alleviating seizures in a pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced rat model has been reported [94,95]. In addition, it has been reported that administration of DMF following status epilepticus increased Nrf2 activity, attenuated the status of epilepticus-induced neuronal cell death, and decreased seizure frequency and the total number of seizures compared to vehicle-treated animals [96]. However, when we used DMF in the Lafora disease mouse model, we observed only a minor effect; it was less effective in preventing neuroinflammation and T-lymphocyte infiltration [87].

5.4. Propranolol

Propranolol is a β-adrenergic antagonist that is used in the treatment of high blood pressure since it improves blood flow and reduces the strain on the heart. This compound can ameliorate microglial reactivity [97,98]. Perhaps this is the reason for its recognized anti-neuroinflammatory [99,100] and neuroprotective properties [101]; but its molecular mechanism is still unknown. Recently, we described the beneficial effect of propranolol on a mouse model of Lafora disease. Propranolol improved not only the attention defects but also neuronal disorganization, astrogliosis, and microgliosis that were present in the hippocampus of the mice in this model [102].
Table 1. Primary and secondary indications of the repurposed drugs described in this work. The mechanism of action in the primary and secondary indication, and the references related to the secondary indication are indicated.
Table 1. Primary and secondary indications of the repurposed drugs described in this work. The mechanism of action in the primary and secondary indication, and the references related to the secondary indication are indicated.
CompoundPrimary IndicationPrimary Mechanism of ActionSecondary IndicationSecondary Mechanism of ActionReferences of Secondary Indication
MetforminType 2 DiabetesReduces hepatic glucose productionAnti-seizure effectAnti-inflammatory, with AMPK-dependent and -independent effectsAnimal models: [75,76,77,78]
Humans: [79]
FingolimodMultiple sclerosisAntagonist of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors with broad action at the central nervous systemAnti-seizure effectAnti-inflammatory; prevents leukocyte infiltration into the brain parenchymaAnimal models: [83,84,85,86,87]
Humans: [88]
Dimethyl FumarateMultiple sclerosisAntioxidant; improves erythroid 2-related factor-dependent actionAnti-seizure effectAnti-inflammatory; prevents leukocyte infiltration into the brain parenchymaAnimal models: [94,95,96]
Propranololb-adrenergic antagonistTreatment of high blood pressure; it improves blood flow and reduces the strain on the heartAnti-seizure effectAnti-inflammatory; reduces microglial activationAnimal models: [102]
IbuprofenNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugInhibitor of cyclooxygenase 2Anti-seizure effectReduces activity of post-synaptic NMDA glutamate receptorsAnimal models: [103,104,105]
N-acetyl CysteineAntioxidantPrecursor of reduced glutathioneAnti-seizure effectAntioxidant, scavenger of reactive oxygen speciesAnimal models: [84]
Humans: [106]

5.5. Ibuprofen

Ibuprofen belongs to the group of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). It is an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase 2 (Cox2) that reduces the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and the release of IL-1b and IL-18. In addition, it negatively regulates the function of the NMDA post-synaptic glutamate receptors, in this way decreasing hyperexcitability and the appearance of seizures in a (PTZ)-induced rat model [103,104]. Ibuprofen also reduced sensitivity to PTZ in a Lafora disease mouse model, decreasing the severity and duration of seizures and downregulating the expression of proinflammatory mediators [105].

5.6. N-Acetyl-Cysteine

N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) is an antioxidant compound and a precursor of reduced glutathione (GSH). It has been reported that the administration of NAC is beneficial for patients suffering from progressive myoclonus epilepsy type I (Unverricht-Lundborg disease) since they showed marked improvement in seizures, ataxia, and the blockade of symptoms progression [84,106].
Any of these repurposing compounds could be used under the notion of “network pharmacology”, formulated recently, where the design of chosen repurposing drug cocktails could be used as anti-seizure medications. This is because it has been reported that the combined action of different repurposing drugs is more beneficial than the action of a single compound [84].

6. Conclusions

There is a close relationship between neuroinflammation and epilepsy. On the one hand, seizures can trigger an inflammatory response in the brain; on the other hand, neuroinflammation affects the regular physiology of astrocytes and microglia, which triggers alterations in different systems (e.g., increased levels of glutamate due to the release of the neurotransmitter from astrocytes, the reduction in the glutamate uptake capacity, etc.), which eventually produces hyperexcitability and excitotoxicity. These lead to the appearance of seizures. We would like to emphasize the important role that the infiltration of peripheral immune cells may play in neuroinflammation and epilepsy. For this reason, compounds designed to alleviate these diseases need to target not only the neuroinflammation caused by reactive astrocytes and microglia but also the functional interaction of these cells with infiltrated peripheral immune cells. The connection between neuroinflammation and epilepsy allows the design of specific anti-inflammatory drugs that could be useful as alternative therapeutics in the treatment of epilepsy, either alone or in combination with general anti-seizure medications.

Author Contributions

P.S.: Conceptualization and writing of the manuscript. T.R.: Review and editing. M.A.G.-G.: Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation PID2020-112972RB-I00, a grant from la Fundació La Marató TV3 (202032), and a grant from the National Institutes of Health P01NS097197, which established the Lafora Epilepsy Cure Initiative (LECI), to P.S.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Xanthos, D.N.; Sandkuhler, J. Neurogenic neuroinflammation: Inflammatory cns reactions in response to neuronal activity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dey, A.; Kang, X.; Qiu, J.; Du, Y.; Jiang, J. Anti-inflammatory small molecules to treat seizures and epilepsy: From bench to bedside. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2016, 37, 463–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vezzani, A. Brain inflammation and seizures: Evolving concepts and new findings in the last 2 decades. Epilepsy Curr. 2020, 20, 40S–43S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Okin, D.; Medzhitov, R. Evolution of inflammatory diseases. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, R733–R740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kolliker-Frers, R.; Udovin, L.; Otero-Losada, M.; Kobiec, T.; Herrera, M.I.; Palacios, J.; Razzitte, G.; Capani, F. Neuroinflammation: An integrating overview of reactive-neuroimmune cell interactions in health and disease. Mediators Inflamm. 2021, 2021, 9999146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Nardo, D. Activation of the innate immune receptors: Guardians of the micro galaxy: Activation and functions of the innate immune receptors. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 1024, 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  7. Klegeris, A. Regulation of neuroimmune processes by damage- and resolution-associated molecular patterns. Neural Regen. Res. 2021, 16, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gong, T.; Liu, L.; Jiang, W.; Zhou, R. Damp-sensing receptors in sterile inflammation and inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 95–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sanz, P.; Garcia-Gimeno, M.A. Reactive glia inflammatory signaling pathways and epilepsy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vezzani, A.; Balosso, S.; Ravizza, T. Neuroinflammatory pathways as treatment targets and biomarkers in epilepsy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 459–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dokalis, N.; Prinz, M. Resolution of neuroinflammation: Mechanisms and potential therapeutic option. Semin. Immunopathol. 2019, 41, 699–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Devinsky, O.; Vezzani, A.; O’Brien, T.J.; Jette, N.; Scheffer, I.E.; de Curtis, M.; Perucca, P. Epilepsy. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 18024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Patel, D.C.; Tewari, B.P.; Chaunsali, L.; Sontheimer, H. Neuron-glia interactions in the pathophysiology of epilepsy. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2019, 20, 282–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Augusto-Oliveira, M.; Arrifano, G.P.; Takeda, P.Y.; Lopes-Araujo, A.; Santos-Sacramento, L.; Anthony, D.C.; Verkhratsky, A.; Crespo-Lopez, M.E. Astroglia-specific contributions to the regulation of synapses, cognition and behaviour. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2020, 118, 331–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, H.G.; Wheeler, M.A.; Quintana, F.J. Function and therapeutic value of astrocytes in neurological diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2022, 21, 339–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Escartin, C.; Galea, E.; Lakatos, A.; O’Callaghan, J.P.; Petzold, G.C.; Serrano-Pozo, A.; Steinhauser, C.; Volterra, A.; Carmignoto, G.; Agarwal, A.; et al. Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions. Nat. Neurosci. 2021, 24, 312–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guttenplan, K.A.; Weigel, M.K.; Prakash, P.; Wijewardhane, P.R.; Hasel, P.; Rufen-Blanchette, U.; Munch, A.E.; Blum, J.A.; Fine, J.; Neal, M.C.; et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes induce cell death via saturated lipids. Nature 2021, 599, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kinboshi, M.; Ikeda, A.; Ohno, Y. Role of astrocytic inwardly rectifying potassium (kir) 4.1 channels in epileptogenesis. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 626658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Binder, D.K.; Steinhauser, C. Astrocytes and epilepsy. Neurochem. Res. 2021, 46, 2687–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vezzani, A.; Ravizza, T.; Bedner, P.; Aronica, E.; Steinhauser, C.; Boison, D. Astrocytes in the initiation and progression of epilepsy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2022, 18, 707–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ben Haim, L.; Carrillo-de Sauvage, M.A.; Ceyzeriat, K.; Escartin, C. Elusive roles for reactive astrocytes in neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2015, 9, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dejakaisaya, H.; Kwan, P.; Jones, N.C. Astrocyte and glutamate involvement in the pathogenesis of epilepsy in alzheimer’s disease. Epilepsia 2021, 62, 1485–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Eid, T.; Lee, T.W.; Patrylo, P.; Zaveri, H.P. Astrocytes and glutamine synthetase in epileptogenesis. J. Neurosci. Res. 2019, 97, 1345–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sandhu, M.R.S.; Gruenbaum, B.F.; Gruenbaum, S.E.; Dhaher, R.; Deshpande, K.; Funaro, M.C.; Lee, T.W.; Zaveri, H.P.; Eid, T. Astroglial glutamine synthetase and the pathogenesis of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Front. Neurol. 2021, 12, 665334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mukhtar, I. Inflammatory and immune mechanisms underlying epileptogenesis and epilepsy: From pathogenesis to treatment target. Seizure 2020, 82, 65–79. [Google Scholar]
  26. Liddelow, S.A.; Guttenplan, K.A.; Clarke, L.E.; Bennett, F.C.; Bohlen, C.J.; Schirmer, L.; Bennett, M.L.; Munch, A.E.; Chung, W.S.; Peterson, T.C.; et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 2017, 541, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liddelow, S.A.; Barres, B.A. Reactive astrocytes: Production, function, and therapeutic potential. Immunity 2017, 46, 957–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aronica, E.; Ravizza, T.; Zurolo, E.; Vezzani, A. Astrocyte immune responses in epilepsy. Glia 2012, 60, 1258–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kwon, H.S.; Koh, S.H. Neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disorders: The roles of microglia and astrocytes. Transl. Neurodegener. 2020, 9, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dossi, E.; Vasile, F.; Rouach, N. Human astrocytes in the diseased brain. Brain Res. Bull. 2018, 136, 139–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Baulac, M.; de Boer, H.; Elger, C.; Glynn, M.; Kalviainen, R.; Little, A.; Mifsud, J.; Perucca, E.; Pitkanen, A.; Ryvlin, P. Epilepsy priorities in europe: A report of the ilae-ibe epilepsy advocacy europe task force. Epilepsia 2015, 56, 1687–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Robel, S.; Sontheimer, H. Glia as drivers of abnormal neuronal activity. Nat. Neurosci. 2016, 19, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Verkhratsky, A.; Sun, D.; Tanaka, J. Snapshot of microglial physiological functions. Neurochem. Int. 2021, 144, 104960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Greenhalgh, A.D.; David, S.; Bennett, F.C. Immune cell regulation of glia during cns injury and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2020, 21, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kinoshita, S.; Koyama, R. Pro- and anti-epileptic roles of microglia. Neural Regen. Res. 2021, 16, 1369–1371. [Google Scholar]
  36. Robel, S.; Buckingham, S.C.; Boni, J.L.; Campbell, S.L.; Danbolt, N.C.; Riedemann, T.; Sutor, B.; Sontheimer, H. Reactive astrogliosis causes the development of spontaneous seizures. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 3330–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, D.; Ren, J.; Luo, Y.; He, Q.; Zhao, R.; Chang, J.; Yang, Y.; Guo, Z.N. T cell response in ischemic stroke: From mechanisms to translational insights. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 707972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hiragi, T.; Ikegaya, Y.; Koyama, R. Microglia after seizures and in epilepsy. Cells 2018, 7, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bernaus, A.; Blanco, S.; Sevilla, A. Glia crosstalk in neuroinflammatory diseases. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2020, 14, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Borst, K.; Schwabenland, M.; Prinz, M. Microglia metabolism in health and disease. Neurochem. Int. 2019, 130, 104331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, J.W.; Chun, W.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, S.M.; Min, J.H.; Kim, D.Y.; Kim, M.O.; Ryu, H.W.; Lee, S.U. The role of microglia in the development of neurodegenerative diseases. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wong, M.; Guo, D. Dendritic spine pathology in epilepsy: Cause or consequence? Neuroscience 2013, 251, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Q.; Barres, B.A. Microglia and macrophages in brain homeostasis and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 225–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wyatt-Johnson, S.K.; Brewster, A.L. Emerging roles for microglial phagocytic signaling in epilepsy. Epilepsy Curr. 2020, 20, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shen, W.; Pristov, J.B.; Nobili, P.; Nikolic, L. Can glial cells save neurons in epilepsy? Neural Regen. Res. 2023, 18, 1417–1422. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jha, M.K.; Jo, M.; Kim, J.H.; Suk, K. Microglia-astrocyte crosstalk: An intimate molecular conversation. Neuroscientist 2019, 25, 227–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, L.R.; Liu, J.C.; Bao, J.S.; Bai, Q.Q.; Wang, G.Q. Interaction of microglia and astrocytes in the neurovascular unit. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Linnerbauer, M.; Wheeler, M.A.; Quintana, F.J. Astrocyte crosstalk in cns inflammation. Neuron 2020, 108, 608–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Eyo, U.B.; Murugan, M.; Wu, L.J. Microglia-neuron communication in epilepsy. Glia 2017, 65, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kabba, J.A.; Xu, Y.; Christian, H.; Ruan, W.; Chenai, K.; Xiang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Saavedra, J.M.; Pang, T. Microglia: Housekeeper of the central nervous system. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 38, 53–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Morin-Brureau, M.; Milior, G.; Royer, J.; Chali, F.; LeDuigou, C.; Savary, E.; Blugeon, C.; Jourdren, L.; Akbar, D.; Dupont, S.; et al. Microglial phenotypes in the human epileptic temporal lobe. Brain 2018, 141, 3343–3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Koh, S. Role of neuroinflammation in evolution of childhood epilepsy. J. Child Neurol. 2018, 33, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sano, F.; Shigetomi, E.; Shinozaki, Y.; Tsuzukiyama, H.; Saito, K.; Mikoshiba, K.; Horiuchi, H.; Cheung, D.L.; Nabekura, J.; Sugita, K.; et al. Reactive astrocyte-driven epileptogenesis is induced by microglia initially activated following status epilepticus. JCI Insight 2021, 6, e135391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Passaro, A.P.; Lebos, A.L.; Yao, Y.; Stice, S.L. Immune response in neurological pathology: Emerging role of central and peripheral immune crosstalk. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 676621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cervellati, C.; Trentini, A.; Pecorelli, A.; Valacchi, G. Inflammation in neurological disorders: The thin boundary between brain and periphery. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2020, 33, 191–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yamanaka, G.; Morichi, S.; Takamatsu, T.; Watanabe, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Ishida, Y.; Oana, S.; Yamazaki, T.; Takata, F.; Kawashima, H. Links between immune cells from the periphery and the brain in the pathogenesis of epilepsy: A narrative review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qiu, Y.M.; Zhang, C.L.; Chen, A.Q.; Wang, H.L.; Zhou, Y.F.; Li, Y.N.; Hu, B. Immune cells in the bbb disruption after acute ischemic stroke: Targets for immune therapy? Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 678744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rodriguez Murua, S.; Farez, M.F.; Quintana, F.J. The immune response in multiple sclerosis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2022, 17, 121–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pitsch, J.; van Loo, K.M.J.; Gallus, M.; Dik, A.; Kamalizade, D.; Baumgart, A.K.; Gnatkovsky, V.; Muller, J.A.; Opitz, T.; Hicking, G.; et al. Cd8(+) t-lymphocyte-driven limbic encephalitis results in temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann. Neurol. 2021, 89, 666–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Troscher, A.R.; Sakaraki, E.; Mair, K.M.; Kock, U.; Racz, A.; Borger, V.; Cloppenborg, T.; Becker, A.J.; Bien, C.G.; Bauer, J. T cell numbers correlate with neuronal loss rather than with seizure activity in medial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2021, 62, 1343–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Villasana-Salazar, B.; Vezzani, A. Neuroinflammation microenvironment sharpens seizure circuit. Neurobiol. Dis. 2023, 178, 106027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vezzani, A.; Di Sapia, R.; Kebede, V.; Balosso, S.; Ravizza, T. Neuroimmunology of status epilepticus. Epilepsy Behav. 2023, 140, 109095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, Y.; Nagib, M.M.; Yasmen, N.; Sluter, M.N.; Littlejohn, T.L.; Yu, Y.; Jiang, J. Neuroinflammatory mediators in acquired epilepsy: An update. Inflamm. Res. 2023, 72, 683–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kaminska, B.; Mota, M.; Pizzi, M. Signal transduction and epigenetic mechanisms in the control of microglia activation during neuroinflammation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1862, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lee, T.S.; Li, A.Y.; Rapuano, A.; Mantis, J.; Eid, T.; Seyfried, T.N.; de Lanerolle, N.C. Gene expression in the epileptic (el) mouse hippocampus. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020, 147, 105152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Grote, A.; Heiland, D.H.; Taube, J.; Helmstaedter, C.; Ravi, V.M.; Will, P.; Hattingen, E.; Schure, J.R.; Witt, J.A.; Reimers, A.; et al. ‘Hippocampal innate inflammatory gliosis only’ in pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain 2023, 146, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. LaMoia, T.E.; Shulman, G.I. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of metformin action. Endocr. Rev. 2021, 42, 77–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sanz, P.; Serratosa, J.M.; Sanchez, M.P. Beneficial effects of metformin on the central nervous system, with a focus on epilepsy and lafora disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Koenig, A.M.; Mechanic-Hamilton, D.; Xie, S.X.; Combs, M.F.; Cappola, A.R.; Xie, L.; Detre, J.A.; Wolk, D.A.; Arnold, S.E. Effects of the insulin sensitizer metformin in alzheimer disease: Pilot data from a randomized placebo-controlled crossover study. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2017, 31, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Brakedal, B.; Haugarvoll, K.; Tzoulis, C. Simvastatin is associated with decreased risk of parkinson disease. Ann. Neurol. 2017, 81, 329–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hervas, D.; Fornes-Ferrer, V.; Gomez-Escribano, A.P.; Sequedo, M.D.; Peiro, C.; Millan, J.M.; Vazquez-Manrique, R.P. Metformin intake associates with better cognitive function in patients with huntington’s disease. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Abdi, M.; Pasbakhsh, P.; Shabani, M.; Nekoonam, S.; Sadeghi, A.; Fathi, F.; Abouzaripour, M.; Mohamed, W.; Zibara, K.; Kashani, I.R.; et al. Metformin therapy attenuates pro-inflammatory microglia by inhibiting nf-kappab in cuprizone demyelinating mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Neurotox. Res. 2021, 39, 1732–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, Y.W.; He, S.J.; Feng, X.; Cheng, J.; Luo, Y.T.; Tian, L.; Huang, Q. Metformin: A review of its potential indications. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2017, 11, 2421–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rotermund, C.; Machetanz, G.; Fitzgerald, J.C. The therapeutic potential of metformin in neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nandini, H.S.; Paudel, Y.N.; Krishna, K.L. Envisioning the neuroprotective effect of metformin in experimental epilepsy: A portrait of molecular crosstalk. Life Sci. 2019, 233, 116686. [Google Scholar]
  76. Yimer, E.M.; Surur, A.; Wondafrash, D.Z.; Gebre, A.K. The effect of metformin in experimentally induced animal models of epileptic seizure. Behav. Neurol. 2019, 2019, 6234758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Berthier, A.; Paya, M.; Garcia-Cabrero, A.M.; Ballester, M.I.; Heredia, M.; Serratosa, J.M.; Sanchez, M.P.; Sanz, P. Pharmacological interventions to ameliorate neuropathological symptoms in a mouse model of lafora disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 1296–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sanchez-Elexpuru, G.; Serratosa, J.M.; Sanz, P.; Sanchez, M.P. 4-phenylbutyric acid and metformin decrease sensitivity to pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures in a malin knockout model of lafora disease. Neuroreport 2017, 28, 268–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Burgos, D.F.; Machio-Castello, M.; Iglesias-Cabeza, N.; Giraldez, B.G.; Gonzalez-Fernandez, J.; Sanchez-Martin, G.; Sanchez, M.P.; Serratosa, J.M. Early treatment with metformin improves neurological outcomes in lafora disease. Neurotherapeutics 2023, 20, 230–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, W.; Li, Y.; Li, F.; Ling, L. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators in stroke treatment. J. Neurochem. 2022, 162, 390–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Peruzzotti-Jametti, L.; Willis, C.M.; Hamel, R.; Krzak, G.; Pluchino, S. Metabolic control of smoldering neuroinflammation. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 705920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hajipour, S.; Khombi Shooshtari, M.; Farbood, Y.; Ali Mard, S.; Sarkaki, A.; Moradi Chameh, H.; Sistani Karampour, N.; Ghafouri, S. Fingolimod administration following hypoxia induced neonatal seizure can restore impaired long-term potentiation and memory performance in adult rats. Neuroscience 2023, 519, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Paudel, Y.N.; Angelopoulou, E.; Piperi, C.; Gnatkovsky, V.; Othman, I.; Shaikh, M.F. From the molecular mechanism to pre-clinical results: Anti-epileptic effects of fingolimod. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2020, 18, 1126–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Klein, P.; Friedman, A.; Hameed, M.Q.; Kaminski, R.M.; Bar-Klein, G.; Klitgaard, H.; Koepp, M.; Jozwiak, S.; Prince, D.A.; Rotenberg, A.; et al. Repurposed molecules for antiepileptogenesis: Missing an opportunity to prevent epilepsy? Epilepsia 2020, 61, 359–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pournajaf, S.; Dargahi, L.; Javan, M.; Pourgholami, M.H. Molecular pharmacology and novel potential therapeutic applications of fingolimod. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 807639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yang, L.X.; Yao, Y.Y.; Yang, J.R.; Cheng, H.L.; Zhu, X.J.; Zhang, Z.J. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 regulates blood-brain barrier permeability in epileptic mice. Neural Regen. Res. 2023, 18, 1763–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Rubio, T.; Campos-Rodriguez, A.; Sanz, P. Beneficial effect of fingolimod in a lafora disease mouse model by preventing reactive astrogliosis-derived neuroinflammation and brain infiltration of t-lymphocytes. Mol. Neurobiol. 2023. [CrossRef]
  88. Naegelin, Y.; Kuhle, J.; Schadelin, S.; Datta, A.N.; Magon, S.; Amann, M.; Barro, C.; Ramelli, G.P.; Heesom, K.; Barde, Y.A.; et al. Fingolimod in children with rett syndrome: The fingorett study. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2021, 16, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rosito, M.; Testi, C.; Parisi, G.; Cortese, B.; Baiocco, P.; Di Angelantonio, S. Exploring the use of dimethyl fumarate as microglia modulator for neurodegenerative diseases treatment. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sadovnikova, I.S.; Gureev, A.P.; Ignatyeva, D.A.; Gryaznova, M.V.; Chernyshova, E.V.; Krutskikh, E.P.; Novikova, A.G.; Popov, V.N. Nrf2/are activators improve memory in aged mice via maintaining of mitochondrial quality control of brain and the modulation of gut microbiome. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Schilling, S.; Goelz, S.; Linker, R.; Luehder, F.; Gold, R. Fumaric acid esters are effective in chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and suppress macrophage infiltration. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2006, 145, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lim, J.L.; van der Pol, S.M.; Di Dio, F.; van Het Hof, B.; Kooij, G.; de Vries, H.E.; van Horssen, J. Protective effects of monomethyl fumarate at the inflamed blood-brain barrier. Microvasc. Res. 2016, 105, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Vainio, S.K.; Dickens, A.M.; Matilainen, M.; Lopez-Picon, F.R.; Aarnio, R.; Eskola, O.; Solin, O.; Anthony, D.C.; Rinne, J.O.; Airas, L.; et al. Dimethyl fumarate decreases short-term but not long-term inflammation in a focal eae model of neuroinflammation. EJNMMI Res. 2022, 12, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Singh, N.; Vijayanti, S.; Saha, L.; Bhatia, A.; Banerjee, D.; Chakrabarti, A. Neuroprotective effect of nrf2 activator dimethyl fumarate, on the hippocampal neurons in chemical kindling model in rat. Epilepsy Res. 2018, 143, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Singh, N.; Saha, L.; Kumari, P.; Singh, J.; Bhatia, A.; Banerjee, D.; Chakrabarti, A. Effect of dimethyl fumarate on neuroinflammation and apoptosis in pentylenetetrazol kindling model in rats. Brain Res. Bull. 2019, 144, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sandouka, S.; Singh, P.K.; Saadi, A.; Taiwo, R.O.; Sheeni, Y.; Zhang, T.; Deeb, L.; Guignet, M.; White, S.H.; Shekh-Ahmad, T. Repurposing dimethyl fumarate as an antiepileptogenic and disease-modifying treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. J. Transl. Med. 2023, 21, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Delpech, J.C.; Madore, C.; Nadjar, A.; Joffre, C.; Wohleb, E.S.; Laye, S. Microglia in neuronal plasticity: Influence of stress. Neuropharmacology 2015, 96, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kota, D.J.; Prabhakara, K.S.; van Brummen, A.J.; Bedi, S.; Xue, H.; DiCarlo, B.; Cox, C.S., Jr.; Olson, S.D. Propranolol and mesenchymal stromal cells combine to treat traumatic brain injury. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2016, 5, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lin, T.W.; Harward, S.C.; Huang, Y.Z.; McNamara, J.O. Targeting bdnf/trkb pathways for preventing or suppressing epilepsy. Neuropharmacology 2020, 167, 107734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Woiciechowsky, C.; Schoning, B.; Stoltenburg-Didinger, G.; Stockhammer, F.; Volk, H.D. Brain-il-1 beta triggers astrogliosis through induction of il-6: Inhibition by propranolol and il-10. Med. Sci. Monit. 2004, 10, BR325–BR330. [Google Scholar]
  101. Dobarro, M.; Gerenu, G.; Ramirez, M.J. Propranolol reduces cognitive deficits, amyloid and tau pathology in alzheimer’s transgenic mice. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013, 16, 2245–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Molla, B.; Heredia, M.; Sanz, P. Modulators of neuroinflammation have a beneficial effect in a lafora disease mouse model. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021, 58, 2508–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Liu, R.; Wu, S.; Guo, C.; Hu, Z.; Peng, J.; Guo, K.; Zhang, X.; Li, J. Ibuprofen exerts antiepileptic and neuroprotective effects in the rat model of pentylenetetrazol-induced epilepsy via the cox-2/nlrp3/il-18 pathway. Neurochem. Res. 2020, 45, 2516–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ali, N.H.; Al-Kuraishy, H.M.; Al-Gareeb, A.I.; Alnaaim, S.A.; Alexiou, A.; Papadakis, M.; Saad, H.M.; Batiha, G.E. Autophagy and autophagy signaling in epilepsy: Possible role of autophagy activator. Mol. Med. 2023, 29, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sinha, P.; Verma, B.; Ganesh, S. Age-dependent reduction in the expression levels of genes involved in progressive myoclonus epilepsy correlates with increased neuroinflammation and seizure susceptibility in mouse models. Mol. Neurobiol. 2022, 59, 5532–5548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hurd, R.W.; Wilder, B.J.; Helveston, W.R.; Uthman, B.M. Treatment of four siblings with progressive myoclonus epilepsy of the unverricht-lundborg type with n-acetylcysteine. Neurology 1996, 47, 1264–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 25 04161 g001
Figure 1. Diagram of the components of the inflammatory reaction. See the text for the description of the different abbreviations.
Figure 1. Diagram of the components of the inflammatory reaction. See the text for the description of the different abbreviations.
Ijms 25 04161 g001
Ijms 25 04161 g002
Figure 2. Main housekeeping functions of astrocytes and dysfunctions when they become reactive. The cartoon refers to a healthy astrocyte. See text for details.
Figure 2. Main housekeeping functions of astrocytes and dysfunctions when they become reactive. The cartoon refers to a healthy astrocyte. See text for details.
Ijms 25 04161 g002
Ijms 25 04161 g003
Figure 3. Astrocyte–microglia crosstalk. On the proinflammatory side of the coin, microglia are activated by the release of different components (e.g., ATP) from neuronal cells. Then, microglia induce the activation of astrocytes by the release of different compounds (IL1a, TNF, C1q). In addition, microglia also release proinflammatory mediators (IL-1b, IL-6, and NO) that maintain astrocyte reactivity. Astrocytes respond to microglia by releasing different proinflammatory mediators (Lcn2, GDNF, C3, CCL2, CXCL10) which maintain microglia in their activated state. On the anti-inflammatory side of the coin, microglia release different mediators (TGF-alpha, IL-4, and IL-10) to counteract the excessive activation of the astrocytes. These last cells also produce anti-inflammatory mediators (ORM2, TGF-beta) to reduce microglial activation. A—astrocytes; M—microglia. See text for details.
Figure 3. Astrocyte–microglia crosstalk. On the proinflammatory side of the coin, microglia are activated by the release of different components (e.g., ATP) from neuronal cells. Then, microglia induce the activation of astrocytes by the release of different compounds (IL1a, TNF, C1q). In addition, microglia also release proinflammatory mediators (IL-1b, IL-6, and NO) that maintain astrocyte reactivity. Astrocytes respond to microglia by releasing different proinflammatory mediators (Lcn2, GDNF, C3, CCL2, CXCL10) which maintain microglia in their activated state. On the anti-inflammatory side of the coin, microglia release different mediators (TGF-alpha, IL-4, and IL-10) to counteract the excessive activation of the astrocytes. These last cells also produce anti-inflammatory mediators (ORM2, TGF-beta) to reduce microglial activation. A—astrocytes; M—microglia. See text for details.
Ijms 25 04161 g003
Ijms 25 04161 g004
Figure 4. General model of neuroinflammation in epilepsy. Activation of microglia and astrocytes by hyperactive neurons leads to the release of proinflammatory mediators (TNF, IL-6, IL-1b), and the activation of the NF-kB signaling pathway. In addition, astrocytes release chemokines (CXCL10, CCL2, CCL5) that make their way to the blood. There, they attract different peripheral immune cells (neutrophils, monocytes, and T-lymphocytes) which infiltrate into the brain parenchyma. There, they express different proinflammatory mediators that, on the one hand, enhance the proinflammatory properties of astrocytes and microglia; on the other hand, they worsen the proinflammatory landscape. Eventually, neurons die and release DAMPs, which start the cycle again. Ne—neurons; A—astrocytes; M—microglia; N—neutrophils; Mn—monocytes; T—T-lymphocytes. A simplified seizure–spikes diagram is shown.
Figure 4. General model of neuroinflammation in epilepsy. Activation of microglia and astrocytes by hyperactive neurons leads to the release of proinflammatory mediators (TNF, IL-6, IL-1b), and the activation of the NF-kB signaling pathway. In addition, astrocytes release chemokines (CXCL10, CCL2, CCL5) that make their way to the blood. There, they attract different peripheral immune cells (neutrophils, monocytes, and T-lymphocytes) which infiltrate into the brain parenchyma. There, they express different proinflammatory mediators that, on the one hand, enhance the proinflammatory properties of astrocytes and microglia; on the other hand, they worsen the proinflammatory landscape. Eventually, neurons die and release DAMPs, which start the cycle again. Ne—neurons; A—astrocytes; M—microglia; N—neutrophils; Mn—monocytes; T—T-lymphocytes. A simplified seizure–spikes diagram is shown.
Ijms 25 04161 g004
Ijms 25 04161 g005
Figure 5. Close relationship of neuroinflammation and epilepsy. Increased neuroinflammation produces dysfunctions in microglia and astrocytes, which end with neuronal hyperexcitability and excitotoxicity, leading to the appearance of seizures. Hyperexcitability and neuronal cell death after seizures release DAMPs (ATP, HMGB1) that activate microglia, and astrocytes and eventually produce the infiltration of peripheral immune cells.
Figure 5. Close relationship of neuroinflammation and epilepsy. Increased neuroinflammation produces dysfunctions in microglia and astrocytes, which end with neuronal hyperexcitability and excitotoxicity, leading to the appearance of seizures. Hyperexcitability and neuronal cell death after seizures release DAMPs (ATP, HMGB1) that activate microglia, and astrocytes and eventually produce the infiltration of peripheral immune cells.
Ijms 25 04161 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanz, P.; Rubio, T.; Garcia-Gimeno, M.A. Neuroinflammation and Epilepsy: From Pathophysiology to Therapies Based on Repurposing Drugs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4161. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25084161

AMA Style

Sanz P, Rubio T, Garcia-Gimeno MA. Neuroinflammation and Epilepsy: From Pathophysiology to Therapies Based on Repurposing Drugs. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(8):4161. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25084161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sanz, Pascual, Teresa Rubio, and Maria Adelaida Garcia-Gimeno. 2024. "Neuroinflammation and Epilepsy: From Pathophysiology to Therapies Based on Repurposing Drugs" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 8: 4161. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25084161

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop