Next Article in Journal
Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes and Heart Failure—A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Mitochondrial Bioenergetics in Different Pathophysiological Conditions 4.0
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Hydrogen Peroxide: A Ubiquitous Component of Beverages and Food

by
Izabela Sadowska-Bartosz
* and
Grzegorz Bartosz
Laboratory of Analytical Biochemistry, Institute of Food Technology and Nutrition, Faculty of Technology and Life Sciences, University of Rzeszow, 4 Zelwerowicza Street, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(7), 3397; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073397
Submission received: 20 March 2025 / Revised: 2 April 2025 / Accepted: 3 April 2025 / Published: 5 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)

Abstract

:
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) plays a signaling role in the body. Numerous studies demonstrated that H2O2, generated mainly by autoxidation of polyphenols, ascorbate and other reduced compounds, is a common component of beverages such as honey, tea, coffee, formulated drinks and alcoholic beverages, and is generated in cooked vegetables. It is produced in fresh milk predominantly by xanthine oxidase. The antimicrobial action of honey depends mainly on H2O2 generated by glucose oxidase and polyphenol autoxidation. Many components of beverages and food scavenge generated H2O2, so its level is a result of the balance between generation and scavenging. This review discusses the mechanisms of hydrogen peroxide formation, collects evidence for the presence and generation of H2O2 in beverages and food, discusses its fate in the gastrointestinal tract, evolutionary aspects of human exposure to alimentary hydrogen peroxide, and both adverse action and possible beneficial effects of the consumed hydrogen peroxide.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), a product of two-electron (per molecule) oxygen reduction, is an oxidizing agent with a standard redox potential at pH 7 E◦’(H2O2, H+/H2O, HO) of 0.320 V and a weak reducing agent, with an E◦’ (O2•−, 2H+/H2O2) of 0.940 V. Hydrogen peroxide is used, i.a., as a wound antiseptic [1,2] and as a bleaching agent in dentistry [3,4]. These applications require high concentrations of hydrogen peroxide of an order of 1 M or higher. At the other concentration extreme, hydrogen peroxide, produced by aerobic cells to nano- to low-micromolar concentrations, is a key secondary messenger signaling molecule in the regulation of many biochemical reactions [5,6,7].
The signaling role of H2O2 is based on its reactions with proteins harboring redox-sensitive elements, such as reactive cysteine residues and metal centers. Oxidation of these structures controls activities of proteins such as protein phosphatases, kinases or transcription factors referred to as redox switches, key players in the regulation of biochemical pathways. A change in the concentration of hydrogen peroxide results in a change in the oxidation state of a redox switch, regulating a downstream pathway and transducing the information along a signaling cascade [6,8,9].
Hydrogen peroxide is removed in vivo mainly in enzymatic reactions catalyzed by catalases, peroxidases (in animals chiefly glutathione peroxidases), peroxiredoxins and in non-enzymatic reactions with available reducing compounds [10,11,12].
Somewhat surprisingly, hydrogen peroxide is also a ubiquitous component of environmental and laboratory water, is commonly generated in beverages and food and is consumed every day.

2. Hydrogen Peroxide in Environmental and Laboratory Water

Hydrogen peroxide is a natural component of any water reservoir; its contents in wet precipitates (rain and ice core samples) water were reported within the range of 10−8–10−5 M. Different authors reported values of H2O2 concentrations in atmospheric precipitation of up to ca. 200 μM, but usually below 50 μM [13]. In rainwater collected at the roof level in central Kowloon, China, the H2O2 concentration was 15.9 μM [14]. Similar concentrations (0.13–48.4 μM) were found for rainwater in Wilmington, NC, USA [13] and in Miami, FL, USA (0.3–38.6 μM) [15]. Somewhat lower values (1.3–3.2 μM) were reported from Xi’an, China [16]. Rainwater in a typical mid-size city in tropical Brazil contained 5.8–96 μM H2O2 [17]. The sources of hydrogen peroxide in atmospheric waters include the dissolution of gas-phase hydrogen peroxide and aqueous-phase production [13]. A strong seasonal dependence of the rainwater H2O2 levels was observed, with the highest concentrations in the summer and lowest in the winter, correlating with the stronger solar radiation and higher vaporization of volatile organic compounds in the summer and fall. Measurements also showed a trend for an increase in the H2O2 levels with increasing ambient rainwater temperature [13,15]. Environmental pollution, including biomass burning emissions and photochemical reactions, were also found to be important factors affecting the concentration of H2O2 in the atmosphere and rainwater [17].
The reported concentrations of hydrogen peroxide in fresh and saline natural surface waters were lower, generally 0.01–5 μM [18], and lower in seawater in comparison to freshwater [19]. Seawater in the South China Sea was found to contain 14–24 nM H2O2 [20]. After rainfall, the H2O2 contents of the ocean surface sharply increased (10–100 times) but returned to a stationary level within several hours [21]. Shallow lakes typical of eastern North Carolina contain about 0.20 μM H2O2 on average, but extreme rains might triple the amount normally present [13]. Water from the unpolluted Volga river was found to contain about 1 μM hydrogen peroxide, with daily concentrations being determined by solar illumination, affecting both photochemical and biological generation, increasing in the daytime and decreasing at night [21].
Hydrogen peroxide can also be detected in laboratory water. Physical factors such as heat or mechanical shaking may induce the formation of minute amounts of H2O2 in aqueous solutions. Air-saturated 1 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, was found to contain 5.7 nM H2O2 at room temperature. Heating the buffer at 75 °C for 4 h increased this level to ca. 8.5 nM [22]. Mechanical oscillations (30 Hz, amplitude of 5 mm) were reported to induce H2O2 formation in air-saturated water at a rate of 1 nM/min [23,24]. Hydrogen peroxide (ca. 30 μM) was found to be spontaneously produced from pure water by atomizing bulk water into microdroplets (1 to 20 μm in diameter), most probably via the recombination of hydroxyl radicals (OH) generated by the loss of an electron from OH at or near the surface of the water microdroplets [25].

3. Sources of Hydrogen Peroxide in Beverages and Food

Several sources of hydrogen peroxide in beverages and food should be considered. One is the enzymatic production of hydrogen peroxide in fresh, not processed, food. In fresh milk, the main source of hydrogen peroxide is xanthine oxidase [26], while in honey, H2O2 is generated by glucose oxidase [27]. Generally, the main source of hydrogen peroxide in beverages and food is the autoxidation of food components. These compounds, such as phenolic compounds, ascorbic acid, thiols and reduced metal ions act as antioxidants, but when in contact with oxygen they are subject to oxidation (often referred to as autoxidation), eventually producing hydrogen peroxide [28].
The autoxidation of phenolic compounds, including those present in food and beverages, proceeds in two steps. In the first step, a phenolic compound H2Q is oxidized to a semiquinone free radical HQ in a reaction coupled to the reduction of molecular oxygen to the superoxide anion radical O2•− (1); then, the semiquinone is oxidized to quinone Q, producing the second superoxide radical (2):
H2Q + O2 → HQ + O2•− + H+
HQ + O2 → Q + O2•− + H+
Dismutation of superoxide radicals (3) or the oxidation of another molecule by the superoxide radical (4) produces hydrogen peroxide:
O2•− + O2•− + 2H+ → H2O2 + O2
H2S + O2•− + H+ → HS + H2O2
where H2S is an oxidizable substrate and HS represents a radical product of its one-electron oxidation [29].
The autoxidation of phenolics is pH-dependent, as the phenolate anion is more reactive than the undissociated phenol group. The production of H2O2 by epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), the main catechin present in the tea increased drastically with the pH elevation from 6 to 8 being practically constant in the pH range of 2–6 and about 100 times lower than that, also practically constant, in the pH range of 8–12. Autoxidation of one EGCG molecule produces two molecules of hydrogen peroxide, although at higher EGCG concentrations, the amount of H2O2 formed is lower [30]. The autoxidation can be catalyzed by transition metal ions [31]. Removal of the transition metal by metal chelators (phenantroline, desferoxamine) decreased H2O2 formation by tea catechins [32].
Similarly, the autoxidation of other food components produces hydrogen peroxide, usually in two one-electron steps involving superoxide radical anion as an intermediate. The relatively low standard reduction potential of ascorbate (0.19 V for the dehydroascorbate/ascorbate couple at pH 3.5) should allow it to be readily oxidized by molecular oxygen. However, although this redox reaction is thermodynamically possible, it is spin-forbidden and the only ascorbate species capable of true autoxidation is the ascorbate dianion whose share rises with increasing pH, and thus ascorbate autoxidation rate increases with pH elevation. Ascorbate autoxidation is also catalyzed by transition metal ions [33,34,35].
Low-molecular weight thiols and cysteine residues in proteins, as well as reduced free and protein-bound metal ions and other components of beverages and food, are also subject to autoxidation when in contact with oxygen. As the thiolate anion is more reactive than the not dissociated thiol, the rate of thiol autoxidation of thiols is again pH-dependent and enhanced by alkaline pH and may be catalyzed by metal ions [28]. Organic acids such as tartaric acid in wine can be subject to iron-catalyzed autoxidation [36,37]. Autoxidation of Maillard reaction products formed in reactions of sugars and amino acids at elevated temperatures was suggested to be a significant source of H2O2 in the coffee [38].
Hydrogen peroxide formed in the autoxidation reactions can oxidize further substrates [28,37], thus perpetuating the oxidation of beverage/food constituents.

4. Hydrogen Peroxide in Beverages and Food

4.1. Milk

Mother’s milk is not only healthy, and initially the only nutrient for a newborn, but it also has antibacterial, antiviral, antiamebal and antifungal properties. One of the main antimicrobial components of the milk is hydrogen peroxide, which has a microbicidal action itself and is a substrate for lactoperoxidase. In human milk, the highest H2O2 concentration was found in the first week postpartum (25.0 µM), decreasing progressively during the second, third and fourth week postpartum to 20.4, 15.8 and 8.8 µM, respectively. Storage at freezing temperature for up to 4 weeks did not cause any significant decrease of the H2O2 concentration in the milk [39]. Another study found H2O2 concentration in fresh breast milk samples to be 27.3 µM [40].
Xanthine oxidase (XO; EC 1.17.3.2) is the main source of hydrogen peroxide in breastmilk. Xanthine oxidase activity was detected in the milk of all mammals studied, with higher activity in bovine milk than in human milk. XO is a major protein component of the milk fat globule membrane surrounding the fat droplets that form a suspension in freshly expressed milk. XO activity in breast milk samples was found to be 8.0 U/L. No XO activity was detected in pasteurized breastmilk, in infant dried-milk formula or in pasteurized bovine milk, demonstrating that milk XO is inactivated by commercial heat-pasteurization. In the presence of its biochemical substrates (hypoxanthine or xanthine), XO produces superoxide and hydrogen peroxide [41]:
Hypoxanthine + O2 + H2O → xanthine + H2O2
Xanthine + 2 O2 + H2O → uric acid + 2 O2−• + 2 H+
Xanthine + O2 + H2O → uric acid + H2O2
Superoxide radical anion dismutates (reaction 3), producing hydrogen peroxide.
Milk XO can produce additional hydrogen peroxide in the mouth as saliva provides its substrates. When breastmilk was mixed with a neonatal saliva (containing endogenous 30 μM xanthine and 70 μM hypoxanthine), the interaction yielded an additional 40 μM H2O2 during a 1-h incubation [40].
Hydrogen peroxide may be added to the milk as an antibacterial preservative, although the supplementation of milk with H2O2 is prohibited in many countries due to its toxic effects. When added to milk and other foodstuff, H2O2 causes a series of negative effects and adversely affects nutritional value due to the oxidation of vitamins E and A and folic acid. Consequently, if ingested, H2O2 can cause adverse effects on the population’s health, especially for immunocompromised people. Concentrations of peroxide ions (O22−) higher than 0.1% w/w may be the cause of cancer in mice and produce genotoxicity [42]. However, in countries where appropriate cooling of milk during preservation and transport may be difficult, prolongation of milk shelf-life by addition of hydrogen peroxide seems to be a method of choice. Addition of H2O2 up to the concentration of 0.14% was recommended to preserve the consumption fitness of raw cow’s milk [43].
Guidelines for admissible hydrogen peroxide content in milk levels of usage vary between countries. For example, in Australia and New Zealand, H2O2 up to 5 ppm (147 µM) is allowed for processing selected dairy-based products [44]. In Taiwan, H2O2 is only allowed in the processing of selected products, including surimi [45], while in Japan, no residual H2O2 is allowed in any ready-to-eat food product [44] (although its spontaneous formation is unavoidable as shown later on). In the USA, H2O2 is used in aseptic packaging provided the final concentration in the food is <0.5 ppm (14.7 µM) [44]. According to the Food and Drug Administration, the percentage of hydrogen peroxide in the milk used for the production of cheeses may not exceed 0.05% of the weight of the milk in the United States (only for the production of cheeses, but H2O2 must be eliminated during the pre-treatment step) [42,46].

4.2. Honey

A broad range of H2O2 concentrations was reported in honeys of various origin (0.04 to 4 mM, with an average of 2.5 mM [27]). Hydrogen peroxide in honey is produced mainly by glucose oxidase (EC 1.1.3.4) secreted into the honey by bees [47,48,49]. The levels of hydrogen peroxide in honey are determined by the difference between the rate of its production and its destruction, mainly by catalases but also by reactions with polyphenols [49]. Bees introduce glucose oxidase to honey during nectar harvesting; the gox gene coding for this enzyme is solely expressed in the hypopharyngeal glands of worker bees. The amount of glucose oxidase in the honey depends on the age and health status of the foraging bees [48]. Catalase originates from pollen and its level depends on the amount of pollen grains in the honey [47]. The colloidal structure of honey was postulated to facilitate H2O2 formation by increasing the activity of glucose oxidase [47,50]. However, some studies suggest a lack of correlation between levels of H2O2 and glucose oxidase activity in honey [51]. Manuka honey, a pronounced medical-grade honey, accumulates only negligible amounts of H2O2. This may be explained by the activity of methylglyoxal, a major antibacterial factor of manuka honey, which induces a modification of protein components of the honey, including glucose oxidase, resulting in a loss of their biological activities. The addition of methylglyoxal dose-dependently inhibited H2O2 production in honeydew honey [52].
Enzymes contained in flower nectar may also produce hydrogen peroxide. Microorganisms, such as fungi and bacteria, found in some honeys, can contribute to H2O2 generation as well. Polyphenol (flavonoid and phenolic acid) autoxidation may be another source of hydrogen peroxide in honey [47]. Darker honeys usually have higher total polyphenol content [27,53]. The production and accumulation of hydrogen peroxide was the highest in dark honeys, intermediate in medium dark honeys and the lowest in light honeys, which suggests that compounds influencing honey color participate in H2O2 production [27]. Although several groups of compounds, among them carotenoids, polyphenols, metal ions and melanoids, can contribute to the color of honey, the ability of phenolic compounds to autoxidize makes them the most probable non-enzymatic generators of H2O2. Flavonoids and their quinones are themselves natural chromophores displaying a range of colors from light yellow to dark brown; the colors are influenced by interaction with iron ions [54]. Moreover, the flavonoid oxidation to semiquinones and quinones generates yellowish colors, while oxidatively polymerized phenolic acids and flavonoids increase browning [27].
Dark honeys were found to possess significant concentrations of p-hydroxybenzoic, chlorogenic and caffeic acids in addition to phenyllactic, p-coumaric, abscisic and ellagic acids [55,56,57]. They also contain flavonoids, including pinocembrin, galangin and myricetin derivatives, glycosylated flavonols, quercetin rhamnoside, rutin and kaempferol rhamnoside, chrysin (5,7-dihydroxyflavone), quercetin, kaempferol, fisetin, myricetin, morin, and rutin, daidzein and genistein [55,57,58]. Cooperative action between flavonols (quercetin or rutin) and flavanones (naringenin and naringin) which increases the ability of flavanones to donate electrons and oxidize has been demonstrated [59]. Thus, the synergistic action of polyphenolic acids and flavonoids rather than an individual compound was suggested to play a role in the pro-oxidant activity and generation of H2O2 in honey. The average pH of honey ranges between 3.5 and 5.5, which should be inhibitory for polyphenol autoxidation. However, several aspects of polyphenol autooxidation can compensate for the effect of low pH [27,50].
Similarly, additional mechanisms contribute to the degradation of hydrogen peroxide in honey, including ascorbic acid, which may be oxidized by hydrogen peroxide. Hydrogen peroxide can also be consumed in the Fenton reaction [27]. The presence of trace metals bound to proteins or chelated by polyphenols has been demonstrated in honeys. Dark honeys (buckwheat, heather, and honeydew in comparison to light honeys such as acacia or rape honey) were found to contain higher quantities of transition metal ions such as Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mn [60,61].
The dilution of honey activates glucose oxidase (and also phenolic autoxidation) resulting in time- and dilution-dependent production of H2O2. Honey diluted to 20–40% was reported to generate hydrogen peroxide, which reached a maximum concentration of 5.62 mM for 30% honey after 24 h [62]. Another study, using four West Australian honeys, revealed maximum H2O2 generation in 30% honey solution in the range of 76–479 µM after 6 h. No H2O2 was generated in the Manuka honey [63]. Honeydew honey samples diluted to 40% produced 0.3 to 3.4 mM H2O2 after 24 h incubation at 37 °C [64].
Generally, the relationship between H2O2 production and honey dilution assumes an inverted U-shaped curve [50,51]. This effect is of physiological significance, as honey is consumed often as an additive to beverages; of course, its addition to hot tea inactivates glucose oxidase, lowering this effect; additionally, honey is diluted in the digestive tract which may activate glucose oxidase (if active) until inactivated and digested. A similar phenomenon can occur in honey dressings used for wound healing [27]. What is important for the assay of H2O2 levels in honey is that such an effect may also occur during the assay of hydrogen peroxide content in the honey, since honey samples are usually diluted prior to the assay, and may lead to some overestimation of the real H2O2 concentration in the honey, dependent on details of the assay procedure.
Standard heat and filtration processing (heating at 45 °C for 8 h and filtering through a 100 µm filter (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) were found to reduce the levels of H2O2 in honey [65].

4.3. Tea and Coffee

Fresh tea leaves contain 18–32% dry weight of flavan-3-ols. Epigallocatechin gallate constitutes about half of this amount, followed by epigallocatechin, epicatechin gallate, epicatechin, gallocatechin, catechin and other minor flavanols and other polyphenols, mainly gallic acid [66,67]. Coffee is also rich in polyphenols (up to 1–2% of dry weight), including phenolic acids and flavonoids, first of all EGCG [68,69]. Black tea also has significant amounts of theaflavins, thearubigins and other catechin polymeric pigments [70].
Coffee contains significant amounts of Maillard reaction products [38,71]; some amounts of these compounds are also present in processed tea [72]. All these compounds can generate hydrogen peroxide upon autoxidation. The presence of the 1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene structure (a galloyl group) or the o-3′, 4′-dihydroxy catechol structure determines the maximal electron-donating effect of polyphenols and autoxidation to corresponding quinones [73]. The presence of transition metal catalyzing the autoxidation of polyphenols is essential [74]. Differences in the concentrations of Fe (II), Cu (I) and Mn (II) transition metals are thus important factors determining the yield of H2O2 formation in tea and other beverages [75].
Solutions of catechins in pure water (100 µM) at 50 °C produced H2O2 with the following sequence of yields during 2-h incubation: EGCG (127.0 µM) > epigallocatechin (51.5 µM) > epicatechin gallate (8.4 µM) > epicatechin (6.2 µM) > gallic acid (1.4 µM) [76]. In another study, the sequence of H2O2 yields by 500 µM catechins (37 ˚C, 1 h) was generally similar: EGCG (191 µM) > epigallocatechin (179 µM) > gallic acid (28 µM) > epicatechin (21 µM) > methyl gallate (4 µM) [77].
1,2,4-Benzenetriol (hydroxyhydroquinone) is one of the main components in roasted coffee which generates H2O2. Although it is stable in the slightly acidic brewed coffee, it generates 0.5–0.6 moles of hydrogen peroxide per mole during incubation under aerobic conditions at pH 7.4 [78].
Although the average pH of tea and coffee is around 5.5 and does not promote the deprotonation of polyphenol -OH groups, tea and coffee, the most commonly consumed beverages next to water, can generate hydrogen peroxide to achieve levels over 100 μM, in contrast to cocoa, which was found not to generate H2O2 [79]. However, hydrogen peroxide was also reported in cocoa (infused with water and not containing milk) [80].
Hydrogen peroxide generation was much higher in a phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, than in distilled water (green tea, 1102 µM vs. 0 µM pH 6.0, black tea, 790 µM vs. ca. 210 µM at pH 5.5; coffee, 240 µM vs. ca. 140 µM at pH 6.8) [81]. While green tea (1% w/v) in distilled water was found to generate only 19 μM H2O2 upon 2-h incubation, this tea added to a cell culture medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium, DMEM) of neutral pH and containing some Fe (III) generated up to 180 μM H2O2 [82]. Green tea and several herbal teas generated considerable amounts of H2O2 when brewed in a phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (up to ca. 1.1 mM for green tea). The addition of hibiscus and thorn apple tea decreased the production of H2O2 in the catechin-rich green tea, possibly due to a lowering of the pH of the mixture [83,84,85]. In another study, green tea produced up to 100 µM of H2O2 during 3-h incubation. More H2O2 was generated in tea prepared with tap water than in tea prepared with distilled water. The addition of a lemon slice decreased H2O2 generation in the tea, partly due to the lowering pH of the tea [32]. Hydrogen peroxide was produced in various tea brands and tea-like drinks, including white, green, red and black tea, rooibos and yerba mate [80].
Espresso coffee, filter coffee and instant coffee were found to generate hydrogen peroxide upon brewing (ca. 80, 20 and 15 µM, respectively). The H2O2 concentrations remained fairly stable at room temperature for up to 5 h; however, 24-h incubation under cell culture conditions (37 °C, 5% CO2) led to a significant increase in the H2O2 concentration, up to ca 370 and 330 µM for filter coffee and espresso, respectively. Green coffee did not generate measurable amounts of H2O2 upon brewing and subsequent incubation at room temperature but produced low amounts of hydrogen peroxide (ca. 20 µM) when incubated under cell culture conditions [38].
Only small amounts of hydrogen peroxide were detected in commercially sold bottle-packaged beverages, such as tea or coffee, immediately after opening of bottles, but H2O2 was gradually produced in the beverages after opening the caps, i.e., upon exposure to air. The production of H2O2 increased both with the duration of the exposure to air and the rise in temperature. The addition of citric acid, malic acid, succinic acid, fumaric acid, L-ascorbic acid, L-glutamic acid and L-aspartic acid to the tea reduced H2O2 generation, apparently due to the lowering of the pH. The addition of milk or lemon to the black tea reduced H2O2 generation but milk did not affect H2O2 generation by coffee. Hydrogen peroxide production in the green tea was lowered by the addition of aqueous extracts of citrus (orange, grapefruit, natsumikan, lemon or lime) juices and peels. While the effect of citrus juices was mainly due to the lowering of pH, the peels decreased H2O2 production even in buffer, pH 7.4. These extracts were also able to degrade H2O2 preformed in the tea, which may partly explain their effect [84,85].
Linalool, one of the substances responsible for the aroma of the tea, increased the H2O2 production by EGCG, most likely due to a combined action of flavanols and other tea components. Hydrogen peroxide destroyed linalool, leading to flavor deterioration of tea beverages [76].
Holding green tea in the mouth or chewing tea leaves generates hydrogen peroxide in the saliva. Holding 0.1–0.6% green tea in the mouth for 2 min generated 2.9–9.6 µM H2O2 while chewing 2 g of green tea leaves produced up to 31.2 µM H2O2 [86].
Increased levels of H2O2 were also detected in the urine of healthy volunteers for up to 2 h after drinking coffee [87]. This phenomenon was confirmed in another study, which showed that drinking a cup of coffee resulted in the excretion of 0.5–5 µmol H2O2 per µmol creatinine during 3 h (1 to 4 h after consumption). Autoxidation of 1,2,4-benzenetriol (and other coffee polyphenols) was suggested as the main source of hydrogen peroxide. The hydrogen peroxide levels of urine increased 5-fold during storage for 2 h after urine collection, in line with this suggestion. Some hydrogen peroxide was detected in healthy human urine (100 ± 60 μM [88], 1–113 µM [89]) and it was noted that urinary hydrogen peroxide levels slowly increased when urine was allowed to stand in air, possibly due to autoxidation of polyphenols taken from food [89,90].

4.4. Cooked Vegetables

Vegetables contain compounds prone to autoxidation, especially phenolics and ascorbic acid. Hydrogen peroxide was found to be generated in cooked vegetables. The highest H2O2 concentration was found in the homogenate of broad bean (73–76 µM in 1:2, w/v homogenates in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 10-min cooking at 95 °C) followed by broccoli (19 μM), onion (10 μM) and leek (10.0 μM). In the decoctions, the highest concentration of hydrogen peroxide was revealed for broccoli (24 μM), broad bean (21 μM), carrot (13 μM) and cauliflower (13 μM). Cooking vegetables in tap water also generated H2O2, albeit at lower concentrations (28 μM for broad bean). Incubation of the homogenates at room temperature decreased or increased the level of hydrogen peroxide after 3 h, depending on the vegetable, and decreased after 24-h incubation [91]. About 10 times more hydrogen peroxide was generated in homogenates of anthocyanin-rich black carrot in comparison with orange carrot [92].

4.5. Herbal Extracts and Spices

Extracts of Rosa canina, Rhodiola rosea, Hypericum perforatum, and Gentiana lutea were found to generate more H2O2 at pH 7.8 than at pH 6.0. The extract of R. rosea (50 µg/mL) produced about 8 µM H2O2 at pH 6.0 and over 100 µM H2O2 at pH 7.8 [93]. Generation of hydrogen peroxide was also demonstrated in infusions of Achillea millefolium, Artemisia absinthium, Cistus incanus, Polygonum aviculare, Taraxacum officinale, Melissa officinalis, Mentha piperica, Plantago lanceolata, Tussilago farfara, Urtica dioica and Rosmarinus officinalis, of leaves of Betula pendula, and inflorescence of Calendula officinalis and Lavandula angustifolia in tap water, without pH adjustment. The main source of hydrogen peroxide in herbal extracts, like in tea, is the autoxidation of phenolic compounds by a two-step mechanism (Section 3), as demonstrated by the presence of an electron spin resonance (ESR) signal of the semiquinone radical and generation of superoxide in tea and herbal infusions [80,94]. The extracts also scavenged exogenous H2O2 [93,94].
Generation of hydrogen peroxide was also detected in the infusions of spices (chili, allspice, green and black pepper, caraway seeds and coriander) [80].

4.6. Other Beverages

Hydrated protein drink mixes were reported to generate hydrogen peroxide, due mainly to ascorbate autoxidation [95]. Flavored carbonated soft drinks were found to contain up to 40–50 µM H2O2. Hydrogen peroxide was also detected in carbonated and noncarbonated mineral water at concentrations of up to several µM. Ascorbic acid was found to be the main component responsible for the generation of H2O2 in soft drinks; interaction with other compounds, such as lactate, glucuronolactone, dextrose, and citrate, may augment the production of hydrogen peroxide. Exposure to light was suggested to contribute to the in situ production of H2O2 in beverages during shelf storage [44]. Commercially available fresh and preserved orange juices were found to contain 2–11 µM H2O2. For the majority of juices, the concentration of H2O2 was significantly enhanced by aeration, particularly for the preserved juices, reaching a maximum level 1–5 h after opening, up to four times after aeration for 1 h; however, after 24 h the levels of H2O2 generally declined to baseline or below. The level of hydrogen peroxide correlated with the concentrations of ascorbic acid, total reducible substances and total sugar [96].

4.7. Unhealthy Providers of Pleasure: Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco Smoke

Hydrogen peroxide is generated in wine mainly by the oxidation of phenolic compounds but consumed in reactions with SO2 and other wine components [97]. The autoxidation of polyphenols in wine, especially in the presence of sulfite, is significantly accelerated by transition metal ions [98]. Generation of hydrogen peroxide was demonstrated during accelerated wine oxidation by oxygen and associated with polymerized polyphenols [99].
No generation of hydrogen peroxide was found in two red wines but the addition of wine to DMEM resulted in the appearance of 71–84 µM H2O2 after a 2-h incubation [82]. A study of 40 wines demonstrated that H2O2 can be detected in some but not all wine samples, and that hydrogen peroxide can be both produced and scavenged by wines, i.a., by the sulfites present in the wine [100].
Many barley proteins are rich in thiol groups and although these exist in unmalted grain in the oxidized form, they become increasingly reduced during malting. These proteins autoxidize, producing hydrogen peroxide during mashing. Any hydrogen peroxide produced from malt constituents is rapidly consumed in reactions with polyphenols and enzymes such as catalase and peroxidases [101]. Hydrogen peroxide can also be produced by autoxidation of cysteine and cysteine residues in proteins catalyzed by Cu (II) during beer malting and brewing [44]. The presence of hydrogen peroxide was detected in six out of ten beers studied; the generation of hydrogen peroxide was found in 4-fold diluted beers incubated with air access [102].
Whiskies contain gallates and other phenolic compounds extracted from toasted, hard oak barrels. These compounds are prone to autoxidation. Fruit tinctures contain polyphenols and other autoxidizing compounds, such as ascorbic acid. The presence of hydrogen peroxide was found in whisky, brandy as well as cherry, raspberry, hazelnut, quince, apricot, plum, lemon, dogwood and curcuma tinctures. Hydrogen peroxide was also generated in most of these beverages upon bottle opening [102].
The presence of an ESR signal of free radicals, probably mainly of semiquinone radicals, products of the first step of polyphenol autoxidation, was detected in wines. The intensity of this signal increased after contact with air and then decreased [103]. An ESR signal of semiquinone radicals was detected in concentrated Scotch whisky [104]. The semiquinone radical as well as the generation of superoxide radical, was detected in beer, brandy and a fruit tincture [102].
Cigarettes are neither food nor beverages; nevertheless, smokers often combine sipping wine or beer with smoking, or smoking is for them a kind of dessert after a meal. It should be noted that cigarette smoke generates hydrogen peroxide in contact with an aqueous medium [105,106,107,108], probably due mainly to the autoxidation of polyphenols present in the smoke [106,107].
Concentrations of hydrogen peroxide found in environmental water, beverages and food and methods used for their estimation are listed in Table 1.

5. Scavenging of Hydrogen Peroxide by Beverages

As mentioned before, components of beverages not only produce hydrogen peroxide but also scavenge exogenous H2O2. Both generation and scavenging of hydrogen peroxide were demonstrated for pure polyphenols. While the concentration of hydrogen peroxide decreased in pyrogallol supplemented with H2O2, the generation of hydrogen peroxide prevailed over its scavenging in a gallic acid solution while in the case of quercetin the net effect depended on the H2O2 concentration, H2O2 scavenging prevailing at higher concentrations of exogenous hydrogen peroxide [80]. The yield of H2O2 generated by EGCG reached its maximum after 48 h of incubation; afterwards, with the extension of incubation time, the hydrogen peroxide produced in the system was gradually removed by EGCG or its degradation products, so that it eventually approached zero [76]. Green, white, red and black tea [84,124], herbal infusions [93,94] and wine [100] were demonstrated to scavenge exogenous H2O2. The ability of plant extracts to scavenge exogenous hydrogen peroxide was found to decrease with increasing pH (7.8 vs. 6.0) [93]. Milk was found to decrease the net H2O2 production by beverages and showed some ability to remove H2O2 itself [79], apparently enzymatically in the case of fresh milk (and not-too-hot beverages).
Thus, depending on the composition of a beverage, the hydrogen peroxide produced is partly or totally scavenged by the beverage, and the amount/generation rate of H2O2 measured depends on the net difference of the real rate of its generation and the rate of scavenging. Hydrogen peroxide may be generated even in beverages in which it is not detected; when ingested and diluted, these beverages may generate hydrogen peroxide as long as they are in contact with oxygen at near-neutral pH. The hydrogen peroxide generated under these conditions may react not only with the compounds present in the beverage but also with other substances present in the body.

6. Fate of Hydrogen Peroxide in the Digestive System

In the mouth, further production of H2O2 from beverages and food can proceed [86]. The ingested hydrogen peroxide may be metabolized by the salivary peroxidase and myeloperoxidase and decomposed by catalase [26,125,126]. Thiocyanate is considered to be an important peroxidase substrate. In neonate saliva the median concentration of thiocyanate was found to be 0.42 mM (with a wide range of 0.08–3.20 mM), then it declined over the weaning period before rising again to an adult median of 1.38 mM (0.45–5.82 mM) [40].
Residual hydrogen peroxide can be transported down the digestive tract. The epithelial cells of the stomach and intestines are always being reproduced, even when the superficial ones die, which may be a physiological adaptation to the exposure to noxious agents, including hydrogen peroxide.
At the low pH of the stomach, no production of hydrogen peroxide can be expected. The autoxidation of dietary components resulting in the production of H2O2 can be resumed in the neutral/alkaline environment of the intestine. At the colonic mucosa, oxygen partial pressure is below 25% of airborne oxygen content, which still allows for autoxidation, albeit with lower efficiency; then, the oxygen content falls further down the digestive tract [127].

7. Adverse Effects of Beverage and Food-Derived Hydrogen Peroxide

Consumption of hydrogen peroxide at concentrations > 3% is known to produce acute symptoms, including gastrointestinal irritation and bleeding burns in the duodenum and stomach, as well as renal failure and gas embolism of the lung and heart tissues [128,129]. Concentrations of hydrogen peroxide ingested in beverages are lower by 3–5 orders of magnitude but it has been hypothesized that the hydrogen peroxide derived from beverages can exert adverse effects including induction of gastric ulcers, gastrointestinal and duodenal cancers [44].

8. Possible Beneficial Effects of Dietary Hydrogen Peroxide

Dietary hydrogen peroxide can have a microbicidal effect, especially in terms of bactericidal action. Concentrated (0.8 to 8 M) hydrogen peroxide is commonly used to disinfect and sanitize medical equipment in hospitals. The bactericidal effectiveness of H2O2 has been demonstrated against various microorganisms including Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas species, and Bacillus spores [46]. The antibacterial activity of such low H2O2 concentrations as those occurring in beverages has been questioned. Nevertheless, even low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide can give rise to a more reactive oxygen species, of undoubtable microbicidal action.
Xanthine oxidase in milk has been shown to catalyze the anaerobic reduction of inorganic nitrite to nitric oxide. Superoxide generated by xanthine oxidase in the presence of molecular oxygen reacts rapidly with nitric oxide to produce peroxynitrite, also a powerful antibacterial agent. Hydrogen peroxide is a substrate for lactoperoxidase present in both milk and saliva, producing antibacterial hypothiocyanite. Supplementation of the saliva–milk media with XO substrates, xanthine and hypoxanthine to activate the milk XO/LPO system significantly inhibited the growth of Staphylococcus aureus compared to the control and nucleoside-supplemented saliva. Inhibition of XO by oxypurinol restored normal growth [40].
The antibacterial, antimycotic and antiviral role of peroxidases has been demonstrated in in vitro studies and should also concern salivary peroxidases. Inhibition of the growth of oral Streptococcus by hydrogen peroxide in the presence of salivary peroxidase was far more effective than by H2O2 alone [130]. The presence of salivary peroxidase activity was associated with the presence of Gram-positive cocci microbial flora in the oral cavity, and its insufficiency has been linked to pathologies, such as caries, periodontitis or infections of the oral mucosa. Thus, oxidants generated by oral peroxidases appear to be an essential ecological determinant for oral health since they could have allowed for the selection of a symbiotic microbiota resistant to oxidative stress [131]. Hydrogen peroxide, the substrate for these peroxidases, is produced mainly by neutrophils and bacteria, but dietary H2O2 can contribute.
The healing properties of honey have been known for centuries but it was recently confirmed that honey can be effective for clearing infections in a wide range of wounds, including abscesses, surgical wounds, traumatic wounds, burns, and ulcers of varied etiology, especially those not responding to conventional therapy. While this effect seems to be mediated mainly by hydrogen peroxide [132], it is contributed to by other mechanisms. Hydrogen peroxide was identified to be the “inhibine”, a previously described component of honey that inhibited bacterial growth [133], although further studies brought complications to this simple picture. In any case, removal of H2O2 by pre-treatment of honey with catalase reduced the honey’s antibacterial activity by 50–80%, confirming its major contribution to its antibacterial activity [63,112,116,134]. The amount of H2O2 produced in honey significantly correlated with the honey Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) [47].
Hydrogen peroxide protects against Helicobacter pylori [135]. In mice, hydrogen peroxide produced physiologically by DUOX2 was demonstrated to prevent the infection and inflammation of the gastric mucosa by Helicobacter felis [136]. This action can be succored by dietary hydrogen peroxide. A retrospective cross-sectional study revealed that consumption of honey, coffee and green tea had protective effects against H. pylori infection [137]. All of them may contain or produce hydrogen peroxide.
Low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide transmitted to or produced in the intestines from beverages and food may play a role in the functioning of this part of the digestive tract. DUOX-derived H2O2 is required for control of intestinal microbiota in Drosophila. This oxidase generates a unique epithelial oxidative burst that limits microbial proliferation in the gut [138]. Hydrogen peroxide was demonstrated to play a signaling and regulatory role in the digestive tract [127]. NOX1-derived H2O2 induced by certain commensal bacteria, such as Lactobacilli, may contribute to mucosal wound healing through focal adhesions, enhancing epithelial cell migration and restitution after injury [139,140]. Low concentrations (1–5 μM) of lipid hydroperoxides were reported to promote the proliferation of colon-derived Caco-2 cells [141]. It can be expected that H2O2 may act similarly, as a similar pattern of cell growth stimulation was observed for low concentrations of various oxidants, including H2O2 [142]. Indeed, while high concentrations of hydrogen peroxide may damage colon cells, low H2O2 concentrations were found to stimulate colonic epithelial proliferation, thus contributing to epithelial repair [143]. Hydrogen peroxide was also reported to promote gastric motility [144]. Alimentary hydrogen peroxide may contribute to all these effects. It may also affect the composition of gut microbiome [145].
Moreover, in the intestines exogenous peroxide may react with available iron, forming hydroxyl radicals and other free radicals, which facilitate digestion as proteins subjected to free radical action may show enhanced susceptibility to proteolytic enzymes [146].

9. In Vitro Cellular Effects of Beverages Mediated by Hydrogen Peroxide

Many plant-derived beverages were found to exert cytostatic or cytotoxic effects on cells, especially malignant cells, in vitro. These effects were often partly mediated by hydrogen peroxide. The addition of green tea and red wine to the culture medium was dose-dependently cytotoxic to PC12 pheochromocytoma cells; this effect was considerably reduced by catalase [82]. Green tea and EGCG were found to increase the intracellular oxidation of dichlorodihydrofluorescein and DNA damage in RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cells and HL60 promyelotic leukemic cells; these effects were prevented by catalase but not superoxide dismutase [147]. Coffee reduced the viability of bovine aorta endothelial cells; catalase partly prevented this effect [38]. Pyrogallol, gallic acid and quercetin decreased the viability of DU-145 prostate cancer cells; this effect was alleviated by catalase [32]. Growth inhibition of PEO1 ovarian cancer cells by extracts of Cistus, Gingko and Tilia was partly prevented by catalase [94].
In vivo, autoxidation of polyphenols and other food components, if ingested, is vastly reduced due to the lower oxygen concentration while hydrogen peroxide produced is efficiently enzymatically scavenged. Therefore, many of the results of in vitro studies of the inhibition of growth of malignant cells by tea and other beverages overestimate the effect which can be achieved in vivo.

10. Evolutionary Aspects of the Generation of Hydrogen Peroxide in Beverages and Food

The presence of hydrogen peroxide in milk made people acquainted with the ingestion of hydrogen peroxide from the very beginning of evolutionary existence of our mammalian ancestors. Apparently, very early our protoplasts had contact with hydrogen peroxide generated in honey. However, more intensive exposure to hydrogen peroxide in food and beverages must have taken place after the mastering of fire and preparation of cooked food and beverages.
An increase in teeth size (megadonthy) before 3 million years ago (Ma) is attributed to a change in food consumed by hominoids, and inclusion of new food such as grasses and sedges [148,149]. From about 2.6 Ma, increased meat eating is well evidenced by archaeological sites that link stone tools and cut-marked bones [150]. The new foods were hard to digest, so the mastering of fire and cooking about 1.7 Ma by Homo erectus greatly increased their digestibility. This could have come with Homo erectus at about 1.7 Ma [149,151].
No significant amounts of H2O2 are ingested in fresh food due mainly to enzymatic decomposition, except for limited autoxidation of its components in the intestines, after deactivation of enzymes present in the food. In contrast, consumption of cooked food and beverages involves the ingestion of hydrogen peroxide produced by autoxidation of its components, especially at elevated temperatures and not removed by heat-denatured enzymes. Thus, there are reasons to postulate that our ancestors were dealing with hydrogen originally present in cooked food and beverages for at least 1.7 Ma. This period seems long enough to allow for the evolutionary acquisition of means of defense if alimentary hydrogen peroxide was really harmful. Comparison of the expression of H2O2-decomposing enzymes in the digestive tract of humans and their closest evolutionary relatives could shed light on this intriguing question.

11. Conclusions

Hydrogen peroxide is a ubiquitous component of beverages and plant-derived food, considered as the healthiest diet components, starting from breastmilk and honey, through tea and infusions of medicinal herbs and spices, till cooked vegetables. Studies on the generation of hydrogen peroxide in animal-based food are needed. Hydrogen peroxide may be harmful at high concentrations but the low concentrations of H2O2 ingested in the diet can exert positive health effects, including antimicrobial action and a signaling role in the digestive tract.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.S.-B. and G.B.; methodology, I.S.-B. and G.B.; investigation, I.S.-B. and G.B.; writing—original draft preparation, I.S.-B. and G.B.; writing—I.S.-B. and G.B.; supervision, I.S.-B.; project administration, I.S.-B.; funding acquisition, I.S.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was performed within the project “Modification of anthocyanins/anthocyanidins as new markers of food oxidation” (number of the application 2023/51/B/NZ9/02490) financed by the National Science Centre (NCN), Poland, in the program “Opus 26”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
DMEMDulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium
DUOXDual oxidase
EGCGEpigallocatechin gallate
ESRElectron spin resonance
FOXFerrous Oxidation-Xylenol Orange
HbHemoglobin
HRPHorseradish peroxidase
MaMillion years ago
NOXNADPH oxidase
OPDVN,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine
XOXanthine oxidase

References

  1. Ortega, K.L.; Rech, B.D.O.; El Haje, G.L.C.; Gallo, C.D.B.; Pérez-Sayáns, M.; Braz-Silva, P.H. Do hydrogen peroxide mouthwashes have a virucidal effect? A systematic review. J. Hosp. Infect. 2020, 106, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Babalska, Z.Ł.; Korbecka-Paczkowska, M.; Karpiński, T.M. Wound antiseptics and European guidelines for antiseptic application in wound treatment. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chemin, K.; Rezende, M.; Costa, M.C.; Salgado, A.D.Y.; de Geus, J.L.; Loguercio, A.D.; Reis, A.; Kossatz, S. Evaluation of at-home bleaching times on effectiveness and sensitivity with 10% hydrogen peroxide: A randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial. Oper. Dent. 2021, 46, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Terra, R.M.O.; da Silva, K.L.; Vochikovski, L.; Sutil, E.; Rezende, M.; Loguercio, A.D.; Reis, A. Effect of daily usage time of 4% hydrogen peroxide on the efficacy and bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity: A single-blind randomized clinical trial. Oper. Dent. 2021, 46, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Heo, S.; Kim, S.; Kang, D. The role of hydrogen peroxide and peroxiredoxins throughout the cell cycle. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sies, H. Dynamics of intracellular and intercellular redox communication. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2024, 225, 933–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Averill-Bates, D. Reactive oxygen species and cell signaling. Review. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2024, 1871, 119573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sies, H.; Belousov, V.V.; Chandel, N.S.; Davies, M.J.; Jones, D.P.; Mann, G.E.; Murphy, M.P.; Yamamoto, M.; Winterbourn, C. Defining roles of specific reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cell biology and physiology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 499–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sies, H.; Mailloux, R.J.; Jakob, U. Fundamentals of redox regulation in biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2024, 25, 701–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Andrés, C.M.C.; Pérez de la Lastra, J.M.; Juan, C.A.; Plou, F.J.; Pérez-Lebeña, E. Chemistry of hydrogen peroxide formation and elimination in mammalian cells, and its role in various pathologies. Stresses 2022, 2, 256–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Handy, D.E.; Loscalzo, J. The role of glutathione peroxidase-1 in health and disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2022, 188, 146–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Villar, S.F.; Ferrer-Sueta, G.; Denicola, A. The multifaceted nature of peroxiredoxins in chemical biology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2023, 76, 102355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Willey, J.D.; Kieber, R.J.; Lancaster, R.D. Coastal rainwater hydrogen peroxide: Concentration and deposition. J. Atmos. Chem. 1996, 25, 149–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tanner, P.A.; Wong, A.Y.S. Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen peroxide in rainwater. Anal. Chim. Acta 1998, 370, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Deng, Y.; Zuo, Y. Factors affecting the levels of hydrogen peroxide in rainwater. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 1469–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, C.; Zhang, Z. Fluorescence determination of hydrogen peroxide using hemoglobin as mimetic enzyme of peroxidase. Anal. Sci. 2001, 17, 1449–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Scaramboni, C.; Crispim, C.P.; Toledo, J.C., Jr.; Campos, M.L.A.D.M. Investigating hydrogen peroxide in rainwater of a typical midsized city in tropical Brazil using a novel application of a fluorometric method. Atmos. Environ. 2018, 176, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kieber, R.J.; Helz, G.R. Two-method verification of hydrogen peroxide determinations in natural waters. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58, 2312–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Petasne, R.G.; Zika, R.G. Fate of superoxide in coastal sea water. Nature 1987, 325, 516–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, M.; Wong, G.T.; Wu, Y.C. The scopoletin-HRP fluorimetric determination of H2O2 in seawaters—A plea for the two-stage protocol. Methods Protoc. 2018, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Duca, G.; Travin, S. Reactions’ mechanisms and applications of hydrogen peroxide. Am. J. Phys. Chem. 2020, 9, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bruskov, V.I.; Malakhova, L.V.; Masalimov, Z.K.; Chernikov, A.V. Heat-induced formation of reactive oxygen species and 8-oxoguanine, a biomarker of damage to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 1354–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gudkov, S.V.; Lyakhov, G.A.; Pustovoy, V.I.; Shcherbakov, I.A. Influence of mechanical effects on the hydrogen peroxide concentration in aqueous solutions. Phys. Wave Phenom. 2019, 27, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gudkov, S.V.; Penkov, N.V.; Baimler, I.V.; Lyakhov, G.A.; Pustovoy, V.I.; Simakin, A.V.; Sarimov, R.M.; Scherbakov, I.A. Effect of mechanical shaking on the physicochemical properties of aqueous solutions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lee, J.K.; Walker, K.L.; Han, H.S.; Kang, J.; Prinz, F.B.; Waymouth, R.M.; Lee, J.K.; Walker, K.L.; Han, H.S.; Kang, J.; et al. Spontaneous generation of hydrogen peroxide from aqueous microdroplets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 19294–19298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Al-Shehri, S.S.; Duley, J.A.; Bansal, N. Xanthine oxidase-lactoperoxidase system and innate immunity: Biochemical actions and physiological roles. Redox Biol. 2020, 34, 101524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brudzynski, K. Unexpected value of honey color for prediction of a non-enzymatic H2O2 production and honey antibacterial activity: A perspective. Metabolites 2023, 13, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M.C. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, 5th ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 39–40. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bayati, M.; Poojary, M.M. Polyphenol autoxidation and prooxidative activity induce protein oxidation and protein-polyphenol adduct formation in model systems. Food Chem. 2025, 466, 142208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Arakawa, H.; Maeda, M.; Okubo, S.; Shimamura, T. Role of hydrogen peroxide in bactericidal action of catechin. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 27, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Geng, Y.; Liu, X.; Yu, Y.; Li, W.; Mou, Y.; Chen, F.; Hu, X.; Ji, J.; Ma, L. From polyphenol to o-quinone: Occurrence, significance, and intervention strategies in foods and health implications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 3254–3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Grzesik, M.; Bartosz, G.; Stefaniuk, I.; Pichla, M.; Namieśnik, J.; Sadowska-Bartosz, I. Dietary antioxidants as a source of hydrogen peroxide. Food Chem. 2019, 278, 692–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Boatright, W.L. Oxygen dependency of one-electron reactions generating ascorbate radicals and hydrogen peroxide from ascorbic acid. Food Chem. 2016, 196, 1361–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shen, J.; Griffiths, P.T.; Campbell, S.J.; Utinger, B.; Kalberer, M.; Paulson, S.E. Ascorbate oxidation by iron, copper and reactive oxygen species: Review, model development, and derivation of key rate constants. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Murekhina, A.E.; Yarullin, D.N.; Sovina, M.A.; Kitaev, P.A.; Gamov, G.A. Copper (II)-catalyzed oxidation of ascorbic acid: Ionic strength effect and analytical use in aqueous solution. Inorganics 2022, 10, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Coleman, R.E.; Boulton, R.B.; Stuchebrukhov, A.A. Kinetics of autoxidation of tartaric acid in presence of iron. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 064503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Coleman, R.E.; Stuchebrukhov, A.A.; Boulton, R.B. The kinetics of autoxidation in wine. In Recent Advances in Chemical Kinetics; Farrukh, M.A., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hegele, J.; Münch, G.; Pischetsrieder, M. Identification of hydrogen peroxide as a major cytotoxic component in Maillard reaction mixtures and coffee. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2009, 53, 760–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Al-Kerwi, E.A.A.; Al-Hashimi, A.H.; Salman, A.M. Mother’s milk and hydrogen peroxide. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 14, 428–431. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Al-Shehri, S.S.; Knox, C.L.; Liley, H.G.; Cowley, D.M.; Wright, J.R.; Henman, M.G.; Hewavitharana, A.K.; Charles, B.G.; Shaw, P.N.; Sweeney, E.L.; et al. Breastmilk-saliva interactions boost innate immunity by regulating the oral microbiome in early infancy. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kostić, D.A.; Dimitrijević, D.S.; Stojanović, G.S.; Palić, I.R.; Đorđević, A.S.; Ickovski, J.D. Xanthine oxidase: Isolation, assays of activity, and inhibition. J. Chem. 2015, 2015, 294858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vasconcelos, H.; Matias, A.; Mendes, J.; Araujo, J.; Dias, B.; Jorge, P.A.; Saraiva, C.; de Almeida, J.M.M.M.; Coelho, L.C. Compact biosensor system for the quantification of hydrogen peroxide in milk. Talanta 2023, 253, 124062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Arefin, S.; Sarker, M.A.H.; Islam, M.A.; Harun-ur-Rashid, M.; Islam, M.N. Use of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in raw cow’s milk preservation. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 2017, 4, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bopitiya, D.; Christensen, D.; Martin, M.; Zhang, J.; Bennett, L.E. Production of hydrogen peroxide in formulated beverages is associated with the presence of ascorbic acid combined with selected redox-active functional ingredients. Food Chem. 2021, 338, 127947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Su, S.C.; Chou, S.S.; Chang, P.C.; Hwang, D.F. Identification of hydrogen peroxide as a causative agent in noodles implicated in food poisoning. J. Food Drug Anal. 2001, 9, 220–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ivanova, A.S.; Merkuleva, A.D.; Andreev, S.V.; Sakharov, K.A. Method for determination of hydrogen peroxide in adulterated milk using high performance liquid chromatography. Food Chem. 2019, 283, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Brudzynski, K. A current perspective on hydrogen peroxide production in honey. A review. Food Chem. 2020, 332, 127229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bucekova, M.; Valachova, I.; Kohutova, L.; Prochazka, E.; Klaudiny, J.; Majtan, J. Honeybee glucose oxidase—Its expression in honeybee workers and comparative analyses of its content and H2O2-mediated antibacterial activity in natural honeys. Die Naturwissenschaften 2014, 101, 661–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Guttentag, A.; Krishnakumar, K.; Cokcetin, N.; Harry, E.; Carter, D. Factors affecting the production and measurement of hydrogen peroxide in honey samples. Access Microbiol. 2021, 3, 000198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Brudzynski, K.; Miotto, D.; Kim, L.; Sjaarda, C.; Maldonado-Alvarez, L.; Fukś, H. Active macromolecules of honey form colloidal particles essential for honey antibacterial activity and hydrogen peroxide production. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Strelec, I.; Crevar, B.; Kovač, T.; Bilić Rajs, B.; Primorac, L.; Flanjak, I. Glucose oxidase activity and hydrogen peroxide accumulation in Croatian honeys. Croat. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 10, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Majtan, J.; Bohova, J.; Prochazka, E.; Klaudiny, J. Methylglyoxal may affect hydrogen peroxide accumulation in manuka honey through the inhibition of glucose oxidase. J. Med. Food. 2014, 17, 290–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Starowicz, M.; Ostaszyk, A.; Zieliński, H. The relationship between the browning index, total phenolics, color, and antioxidant activity of polish-originated honey samples. Foods 2021, 10, 967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bijlsma, J.; de Bruijn, W.J.; Velikov, K.P.; Vincken, J.P. Unravelling discolouration caused by iron-flavonoid interactions: Complexation, oxidation, and formation of networks. Food Chem. 2022, 370, 131292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Becerril-Sánchez, A.L.; Quintero-Salazar, B.; Dublán-García, O.; Escalona-Buendía, H.B. Phenolic compounds in honey and their relationship with antioxidant activity, botanical origin, and color. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nedić, N.; Nešović, M.; Radišić, P.; Gašić, U.; Baošić, R.; Joksimović, K.; Pezo, L.; Tešić, Ž.; Vovk, I. Polyphenolic and chemical profiles of honey from the Tara mountain in Serbia. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 941463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vazquez, L.; Armada, D.; Celeiro, M.; Dagnac, T.; Llompart, M. Evaluating the presence and contents of phytochemicals in honey samples: Phenolic compounds as indicators to identify their botanical origin. Foods 2021, 10, 2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nešović, M.; Gašić, U.; Tosti, T.; Horvacki, N.; Šikoparija, B.; Nedić, N.; Blagojević, S.; Ignjatović, L.; Tešić, Ž. Polyphenol profile of buckwheat honey, nectar and pollen. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2020, 7, 201576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Baranowska, M.; Koziara, Z.; Suliborska, K.; Chrzanowski, W.; Wormstone, M.; Namieśnik, J.; Bartoszek, A. Interactions between polyphenolic antioxidants quercetin and naringenin dictate the distinctive redox-related chemical and biological behaviour of their mixtures. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bektashi, N.L.; Abazi, D.; Popovska, O.; Latifi, A.; Reka, A.A. Characterization Of Honey: Determination of metal, sugar, acid and moisture content characterization of honey content. J. Multidiscip. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2021, 8, 14657–14663. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kędzierska-Matysek, M.; Teter, A.; Stryjecka, M.; Skałecki, P.; Domaradzki, P.; Rudaś, M.; Florek, M. Relationships linking the colour and elemental concentrations of blossom honeys with their antioxidant activity: A chemometric approach. Agriculture 2021, 11, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kwakman, P.H.; Velde, A.A.T.; de Boer, L.; Speijer, D.; Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C.M.; Zaat, S.A. How honey kills bacteria. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 2576–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sindi, A.; Chawn, M.V.B.; Hernandez, M.E.; Green, K.; Islam, M.K.; Locher, C.; Hammer, K. Anti-biofilm effects and characterisation of the hydrogen peroxide activity of a range of Western Australian honeys compared to Manuka and multifloral honeys. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bucekova, M.; Buriova, M.; Pekarik, L.; Majtan, V.; Majtan, J. Phytochemicals-mediated production of hydrogen peroxide is crucial for high antibacterial activity of honeydew honey. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, C.; Campbell, L.T.; Blair, S.E.; Carter, D.A. The effect of standard heat and filtration processing procedures on antimicrobial activity and hydrogen peroxide levels in honey. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wong, M.; Sirisena, S.; Ng, K. Phytochemical profile of differently processed tea: A review. J. Food Sci. 2022, 87, 1925–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Meyer, B.R.; White, H.M.; McCormack, J.D.; Niemeyer, E.D. Catechin composition, phenolic content, and antioxidant properties of commercially-available bagged, gunpowder, and matcha green teas. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2023, 78, 662–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Król, K.; Gantner, M.; Tatarak, A.; Hallmann, E. The content of polyphenols in coffee beans as roasting, origin and storage effect. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2020, 246, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tang, V.C.Y.; Sun, J.; Cornuz, M.; Yu, B.; Lassabliere, B. Effect of solid-state fungal fermentation on the non-volatiles content and volatiles composition of Coffea canephora (Robusta) coffee beans. Food Chem. 2021, 337, 128023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Naveed, M.; BiBi, J.; Kamboh, A.A.; Suheryani, I.; Kakar, I.; Fazlani, S.A.; FangFang, X.; Kalhoro, S.A.; Yunjuan, L.; Kakar, M.U.; et al. Pharmacological values and therapeutic properties of black tea (Camellia sinensis): A comprehensive overview. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 100, 521–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, S.; Sun, H.; Ma, G.; Zhang, T.; Wang, L.; Pei, H.; Li, H.; Gao, L. Insights into flavor and key influencing factors of Maillard reaction products: A recent update. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 973677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, H.; Yang, Y.; Chen, L.; Xu, A.; Wang, Y.; Xu, P.; Liu, Z. Identifying the structures and taste characteristics of two novel Maillard reaction products in tea. Food Chem. 2024, 431, 137125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Truong, V.L.; Jeong, W.S. Cellular defensive mechanisms of tea polyphenols: Structure-activity relationship. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Dzah, C.S.; Zhang, H.; Gobe, V.; Asante-Donyinah, D.; Duan, Y. Anti-and pro-oxidant properties of polyphenols and their role in modulating glutathione synthesis, activity and cellular redox potential: Potential synergies for disease management. Adv. Redox Res. 2024, 11, 100099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Roginsky, V.; Alegria, A.E. Oxidation of tea extracts and tea catechins by molecular oxygen. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 4529–4535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, J.Q.; Gao, Y.; Long, D.; Yin, J.F.; Zeng, L.; Xu, Y.Q.; Xu, Y.Q. Effects of hydrogen peroxide produced by catechins on the aroma of tea beverages. Foods 2022, 11, 1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nakayama, T.; Ichiba, M.; Kuwabara, M.; Kajiya, K.; Kumazawa, S. Mechanisms and structural specificity of hydrogen peroxide formation during oxidation of catechins. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2002, 8, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hiramoto, K.; Mochizuki, R.; Kikugawa, K. Generation of hydrogen peroxide from hydroxyhydroquinone and its inhibition by superoxide dismutase. J. Oleo Sci. 2001, 50, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Long, L.H.; Lan, A.N.B.; Hsuan, F.T.Y.; Halliwell, B. Generation of hydrogen peroxide by “antioxidant” beverages and the effect of milk addition. Is cocoa the best beverage? Free Radic. Res. 1999, 31, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kut, K.; Tama, A.; Furdak, P.; Bartosz, G.; Sadowska-Bartosz, I. Generation of hydrogen peroxide and phenolic content in plant-material-based beverages and spices. Processes 2024, 12, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Akagawa, M.; Shigemitsu, T.; Suyama, K. Production of hydrogen peroxide by polyphenols and polyphenol-rich beverages under quasi-physiological conditions. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003, 67, 2632–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chai, P.C.; Long, L.H.; Halliwell, B. Contribution of hydrogen peroxide to the cytotoxicity of green tea and red wines. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 304, 650–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Aoshima, H.; Ayabe, S. Prevention of the deterioration of polyphenol-rich beverages. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Aoshima, H.; Hirata, S.; Ayabe, S. Antioxidative and anti-hydrogen peroxide activities of various herbal teas. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 617–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ayabe, S.; Aoshima, H. Aqueous extract of citrus peel reduces production of hydrogen peroxide in catechin-enriched green tea. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 1594–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lambert, J.D.; Kwon, S.J.; Hong, J.; Yang, C.S. Salivary hydrogen peroxide produced by holding or chewing green tea in the oral cavity. Free Radic. Res. 2007, 41, 850–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Long, L.H.; Halliwell, B. Coffee drinking increases levels of urinary hydrogen peroxide detected in healthy human volunteers. Free Radic. Res. 2000, 32, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Varma, S.D.; Devamanoharan, P.S. Excretion of hydrogen peroxide in human urine. Free Radic. Res. Commun. 1990, 8, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Long, L.H.; Evans, P.J.; Halliwell, B. Hydrogen peroxide in human urine: Implications for antioxidant defense and redox regulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 262, 605–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hiramoto, K.; Kida, T.; Kikugawa, K. Increased urinary hydrogen peroxide levels caused by coffee drinking. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2002, 25, 1467–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bartosz, G.; Rajzer, K.; Grzesik-Pietrasiewicz, M.; Sadowska-Bartosz, I. Hydrogen peroxide is formed upon cooking of vegetables. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2022, 69, 471–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bartosz, G.; Baran, S.; Grzesik-Pietrasiewicz, M.; Sadowska-Bartosz, I. Antioxidant capacity and hydrogen peroxide formation by black and orange carrots: Black and orange carrots. Agric. Food Sci. 2022, 31, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bayliak, M.M.; Burdyliuk, N.I.; Lushchak, V.I. Effects of pH on antioxidant and prooxidant properties of common medicinal herbs. Open Life Sci. 2016, 11, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tama, A.; Pieńkowska, N.; Stefaniuk, I.; Bartosz, G.; Kapusta, I.; Sadowska-Bartosz, I. is hydrogen peroxide generated in infusions of medicinal herbs? Processes 2023, 11, 2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Boatright, W.L. Hydrogen peroxide generation from hydrated protein drink mixes. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, C1651–C1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Bopitiya, D.; Guo, S.; Hearn, M.T.; Zhang, J.; Bennett, L.E. Formulations of selected Energy beverages promote pro-oxidant effects of ascorbic acid and long-term stability of hydrogen peroxide. Food Chem. 2022, 388, 133037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Oliveira, C.M.; Ferreira, A.C.S.; De Freitas, V.; Silva, A.M. Oxidation mechanisms occurring in wines. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1115–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Danilewicz, J.C. Mechanism of autoxidation of polyphenols and participation of sulfite in wine: Key role of iron. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2011, 62, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Héritier, J.; Bach, B.; Schönenberger, P.; Gaillard, V.; Ducruet, J.; Segura, J.M. Quantification of the production of hydrogen peroxide H2O2 during accelerated wine oxidation. Food Chem. 2016, 211, 957–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tama, A.; Bartosz, G.; Sadowska-Bartosz, I. Is hydrogen peroxide generated in wine? Food Biosci. 2022, 45, 101487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Muller, R. The formation of hydrogen peroxide during oxidation of thiol-containing proteins. J. Inst. Brew. 1997, 103, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Rak, M.; Mendys, D.; Płatek, A.; Sitarz, O.; Stefaniuk, I.; Bartosz, G.; Sadowska-Bartosz, I. Generation of hydrogen peroxide in beer and selected strong alcoholic beverages. Processes 2025, 13, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Rossetto, M.; Vianello, F.; Rigo, A.; Vrhovsek, U.; Mattivi, F.; Scarpa, M. Stable free radicals as ubiquitous components of red wines. Free Radic. Res. 2001, 35, 933–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Cheah, I.; Kelly, J.; Langford, S.J.; Troup, G. Whisky–An ESR and Antioxidant Study. In Condensed Matter and Materials Meeting, Proceedings of the 27 Annual Condensed Matter and Materials Meeting, Wagga, NSW, Australia, 4–7 February 2003; Australian Institute of Physics: Melbourne, Australia, 2003; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  105. Nakayama, T.; Church, D.F.; Pryor, W.A. Quantitative analysis of the hydrogen peroxide formed in aqueous cigarette tar extracts. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1989, 7, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Yan, F.; Williams, S.; Griffin, G.D.; Jagannathan, R.; Plunkett, S.E.; Shafer, K.H.; Vo-Dinh, T. Near-real-time determination of hydrogen peroxide generated from cigarette smoke. J. Environ. Monit. 2005, 7, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Nakayama, T.; Kodama, M.; Nagata, C. Generation of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion radical from cigarette smoke. GANN Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1984, 75, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, C. The determination of hydrogen peroxide generated from cigarette smoke with an ultrasensitive and highly selective chemiluminescence method. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 601, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Abbas, M.E.; Luo, W.; Zhu, L.; Zou, J.; Tang, H. Fluorometric determination of hydrogen peroxide in milk by using a Fenton reaction system. Food Chem. 2010, 120, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Liang, K.Z.; Mu, W.J. ZrO2/DNA-derivated polyion hybrid complex membrane for the determination of hydrogen peroxide in milk. Ionics 2008, 14, 533–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lima, M.J.; Sasaki, M.K.; Marinho, O.R.; Freitas, T.A.; Faria, R.C.; Reis, B.F.; Rocha, F.R. Spot test for fast determination of hydrogen peroxide as a milk adulterant by smartphone-based digital image colorimetry. Microchem. J. 2020, 157, 105042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Brudzynski, K. Effect of hydrogen peroxide on antibacterial activities of Canadian honeys. Can. J. Microbiol. 2006, 52, 1228–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Green, K.J.; Lawag, I.L.; Locher, C.; Hammer, K.A. Correlation of the antibacterial activity of commercial manuka and Leptospermum honeys from Australia and New Zealand with methylglyoxal content and other physicochemical characteristics. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0272376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Farkasovska, J.; Bugarova, V.; Godocikova, J.; Majtan, V.; Majtan, J. The role of hydrogen peroxide in the antibacterial activity of different floral honeys. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2019, 245, 2739–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sowa, P.; Grabek-Lejko, D.; Wesołowska, M.; Swacha, S.; Dżugan, M. Hydrogen peroxide-dependent antibacterial action of Melilotus albus honey. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 65, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Dżugan, M.; Grabek-Lejko, D.; Swacha, S.; Tomczyk, M.; Bednarska, S.; Kapusta, I. Physicochemical quality parameters, antibacterial properties and cellular antioxidant activity of Polish buckwheat honey. Food Biosci. 2020, 34, 100538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Alygizou, A.; Grigorakis, S.; Gotsiou, P.; Loupassaki, S.; Calokerinos, A.C. Quantification of hydrogen peroxide in Cretan honey and correlation with physicochemical parameters. J. Anal. Meth. Chem. 2021, 2021, 5554305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Mohammed, M.E.A.; Alaergani, W.; Suleiman, M.H.; Al-Gramah, H.A. Hydrogen peroxide and dicarbonyl compounds concentration in honey samples from different botanical origins and altitudes in the South of Saudi Arabia. Cur. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. J. 2019, 7, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Li, D.; Wang, M.; Cheng, N.; Xue, X.; Wu, L.; Cao, W. A modified FOX-1 method for Micro-determination of hydrogen peroxide in honey samples. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Osés, S.M.; Rodríguez, C.; Valencia, O.; Fernández-Muiño, M.A.; Sancho, M.T. Relationships among hydrogen peroxide concentration, catalase, glucose oxidase, and antimicrobial activities of honeys. Foods 2024, 13, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Rinkus, S.J.; Taylor, R.T. Analysis of hydrogen peroxide in freshly prepared coffees. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1990, 28, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Fujita, Y.; Wakabayashi, K.; Nagao, M.; Sugimura, T. Implication of hydrogen peroxide in the mutagenicity of coffee. Mutat. Res. Lett. 1985, 144, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Nagao, M.; Fujita, Y.; Wakabayashi, K.; Nukaya, H.; Kosuge, T.; Sugimura, T. Mutagens in coffee and other beverages. Environ. Health Perspect. 1986, 67, 89–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wei, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, J.F.; Wang, Z.Y.; Bickers, D.; Lebwohl, M. Scavenging of hydrogen peroxide and inhibition of ultraviolet light-induced oxidative DNA damage by aqueous extracts from green and black teas. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1427–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Ihalin, R.; Loimaranta, V.; Tenovuo, J. Origin, structure, and biological activities of peroxidases in human saliva. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2006, 445, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Chong, P.H.; He, Q.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, J.; Rao, P.; Zhang, M.; Ke, L. Relation of tea ingestion to salivary redox and flow rate in healthy subjects. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2023, 12, 2336–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Pérez, S.; Taléns-Visconti, R.; Rius-Pérez, S.; Finamor, I.; Sastre, J. Redox signaling in the gastrointestinal tract. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017, 104, 75–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lisanti, M.P.; Martinez-Outschoorn, U.E.; Lin, Z.; Pavlides, S.; Whitaker-Menezes, D.; Pestell, R.G.; Howell, A.; Sotgia, F. Hydrogen peroxide fuels aging, inflammation, cancer metabolism and metastasis: The seed and soil also needs “fertilizer”. Cell Cycle 2011, 10, 2440–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Winterbourn, C.C. Biological production, detection, and fate of hydrogen peroxide. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018, 29, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Thomas, E.L.; Milligan, T.W.; Joyner, R.E.; Jefferson, M.M. Antibacterial activity of hydrogen peroxide and the lactoperoxidase-hydrogen peroxide-thiocyanate system against oral streptococci. Infect. Immun. 1994, 62, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Courtois, P. Oral peroxidases: From antimicrobial agents to ecological actors. Mol. Med. Rep. 2021, 24, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Bang, L.M.; Buntting, C.; Molan, P. The effect of dilution on the rate of hydrogen peroxide production in honey and its implications for wound healing. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2003, 9, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. White, J.W., Jr.; Subers, M.H.; Schepartz, A.I. The identification of inhibine, antibacterial factor in the honey, as hydrogen peroxide, and its origin in a honey glucose oxidase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1963, 73, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Poli, J.-P.; Guinoiseau, E.; Luciani, A.; Yang, Y.; Battesti, M.-J.; Paolini, J.; Costa, J.; Quilichini, Y.; Berti, L.; Lorenzi, V. Key role of hydrogen peroxide in antimicrobial activity of spring Honeydew maquis and chestnut grove Corsican honeys on Pseudomonas aeruginosa DNA. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 66, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Di, J.; Zhang, J.; Cao, L.; Huang, T.T.; Zhang, J.X.; Mi, Y.N.; Xiao, X.; Yan, P.P.; Wu, M.L.; Yao, T.; et al. Hydrogen peroxide-mediated oxygen enrichment eradicates Helicobacter pylori in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e02192–e02219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Grasberger, H.; El-Zaatari, M.; Dang, D.T.; Merchant, J.L. Dual oxidases control release of hydrogen peroxide by the gastric epithelium to prevent Helicobacter felis infection and inflammation in mice. Gastroenterology 2013, 145, 1045–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Habbash, F.; Alalwan, T.A.; Perna, S.; Ahmed, N.; Sharif, O.; Al Sayyad, A.; Gasparri, C.; Ferraris, C.; Rondanelli, M. Association between dietary habits and Helicobacter pylori Infection among Bahraini adults. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Ha, E.M.; Oh, C.T.; Bae, Y.S.; Lee, W.J. A direct role for dual oxidase in Drosophila gut immunity. Science 2005, 310, 847–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wentworth, C.C.; Alam, A.; Jones, R.M.; Nusrat, A.; Neish, A.S. Enteric commensal bacteria induce extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway signaling via formyl peptide receptor-dependent redox modulation of dual specific phosphatase 3. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 38448–38455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Alam, A.; Leoni, G.; Wentworth, C.C.; Kwal, J.M.; Wu, H.; Ardita, C.S.; Swanson, P.A.; Lambeth, J.D.; Jones, R.M.; Nusrat, A.; et al. Redox signaling regulates commensal-mediated mucosal homeostasis and restitution and requires formyl peptide receptor 1. Mucosal Immunol. 2014, 7, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Gotoh, Y.; Noda, T.; Iwakiri, R.; Fujimoto, K.; Rhoads, C.A.; Aw, T.Y. Lipid peroxide-induced redox imbalance differentially mediates CaCo-2 cell proliferation and growth arrest. Cell Prolif. 2002, 35, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Łuczak, K.; Balcerczyk, A.; Soszyński, M.; Bartosz, G. Low concentration of oxidant and nitric oxide donors stimulate proliferation of human endothelial cells in vitro. Cell Biol. Int. 2004, 28, 483–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Craven, P.A.; Pfanstiel, J.; DeRubertis, F.R. Role of reactive oxygen in bile salt stimulation of colonic epithelial proliferation. J. Clin. Investig. 1986, 77, 850–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Fajardo, A.F.; Sobchak, C.; Shifrin, Y.; Pan, J.; Gonska, T.; Belik, J. Hydrogen peroxide promotes gastric motility in the newborn rat. Pediatr. Res. 2018, 84, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Kambe, J.; Usuda, K.; Inoue, R.; Hirayama, K.; Ito, M.; Suenaga, K.; Masukado, S.; Liu, H.; Miyata, S.; Li, C.; et al. Hydrogen peroxide in breast milk is crucial for gut microbiota formation and myelin development in neonatal mice. Gut Microbes 2024, 16(1), 2359729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Wolff, S.P.; Dean, R.T. Fragmentation of proteins by free radicals and its effect on their susceptibility to enzymic hydrolysis. Biochem. J. 1986, 234, 399–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Elbling, L.; Weiss, R.M.; Teufelhofer, O.; Uhl, M.; Knasmueller, S.; Schulte-Hermann, R.; Berger, W.; Micksche, M. Green tea extract and (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate, the major tea catechin, exert oxidant but lack antioxidant activities. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 807–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Lee-Thorp, J.A.; Sponheimer, M.; Passey, B.H.; De Ruiter, D.; Cerling, T.E. Stable isotopes in fossil hominin tooth enamel suggest a fundamental dietary shift in the Pliocene. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 365, 3389–3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Gowlett, J.A. The discovery of fire by humans: A long and convoluted process. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 371, 20150164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Semaw, S.; Rogers, M.J.; Quade, J.; Renne, P.R.; Butler, R.F.; Dominguez-Rodrigo, M.; Stout, D.; Hart, W.S.; Pickering, T.; Simpson, S.W. 2.6-Million-year-old stone tools and associated bones from OGS-6 and OGS-7, Gona, Afar, Ethiopia. J. Hum. Evol. 2003, 45, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wrangham, R. Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Reported concentrations of hydrogen peroxide in environmental water, beverages and food.
Table 1. Reported concentrations of hydrogen peroxide in environmental water, beverages and food.
MaterialMethodH2O2 ConcentrationReference
Rainwater in Miami, FL, USASpectrophotometric with HRP and N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine (OPDV)6.9 μM (0.3–38.6 μM)[15]
Rainwater collected at roof-top level in central Kowloon, ChinaSpectrophotometric with HRP and OPDV15.9 μM[14]
Rainwater collected in Wilmington, NC, USAFluorimetric, with HRP and scopoletin12 μM (0.13–48.4) μM[13]
Rainwater (Xi’an, China)Fluorimetric, with thiamine and Hb1.3–3.2 μM[16]
Ribeirão Preto, BrazilFluorimetric, with 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin28.6 ± 1.4 μM (5.8–96 μM)[17]
Seawater (South China Sea)Fluorimetric, with scopoletin14–24 nM[20]
Fresh and saline natural surface watersIodometric titration0.05–5.00 μM[18]
Human milk, 1st week postpartumLuminol chemiluminescence25.0 µM[39]
Human milk, 1 to 5 days postpartumFluorimetric, with Ampliflu Red and HRP27.3 μM[40]
Bovine milk from a supermarket (Wuhan)Fluorimetric with Fe2+ and coumarin0.39–0.44 μM[109]
Sterilized bovine milkElectrochemical sensor using Hb–DNA/ZrO2/Au electrodeNot detected[110]
Milk from a local market (Brazil)Fe2+/thiocyanate/smartphone cameraNot detected[111]
Honey, 18 kinds (Canada)Fluorimetric, Ampliflu Red kit with HRP29-239 µM[112]
Various honeys, AustraliaSpectrophotometric, with o-dianisidine and HRP0–916 µM[65]
Honey, 20 kinds (Slovakia)Fluorimetric, Ampliflu Red kit with HRP0.3–3.7 mM[48]
Honeydew honey, mainly from Abies alba (Slovakia), 2 y oldFluorimetric, Ampliflu Red kit with HRP307 and 496 µM[52]
Robinia (Robinia pseudoacacia) honey (Slovakia), 1 y oldFluorimetric, Ampliflu Red kit with HRP36.3 µM[52]
Manuka honey, mainly from New Zealand, 3 y oldFluorimetric, Ampliflu Red kit with HRP78.9 µM[52]
Manuka honeys from Australia and New ZealandSpectrophotometric, with o-dianisidine and HRP0–78 µM[113]
Honey from Leptospermum spp. (Australia)Spectrophotometric, with o-dianisidine and HRP143 µM[113]
Acacia, linden, rapeseed and sunflower honeyMegazyme GOX assay
(absorptiometric)
12.1, 19.9, 12.3 and 37.2 µg/g, respectively[114]
Melilotus albus honey, PolandSpectrophotometric, with o-dianisidine and HRP19–125 µM[115]
Buckwheat honey, PolandSpectrophotometric, with o-dianisidine and HRP0.04–0.74 mM[116]
Various honeys, SlovakiaMegazyme GOX assay
(absorptiometric)
0.36–1.09 mmol/kg[114]
Various honeys, CreteSpectrophotometric, with o-dianisidine and HRP36–45 µM in 30% v/v aqueous honey solution[117]
Acacia spp. and Ziziphus spina christi honeys, Saudi ArabiaCe(IV) sulfate titration2.5 and 3.9% (ca. 0.73 and 1.15 M), respectively[118]
35 monofloral honeysModified FOX assay (absorptiometric)5.9–214.2 µmol/kg[119]
24 honeys, SpainFluorescence Assay Kit using Ampliflu Red21–1398 µmol/kg[120]
Green tea, 1% (w/v) in distilled waterFOX assay (absorptiometric)13 and 19 µM after 1 and 2 h, respectively[82]
Green tea, 5 mg/mL phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 24 h, 37 °CFOX assay (absorptiometric)1102 µM[81]
Black tea, 5 mg/mL phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 24 h, 37 °CFOX assay (absorptiometric)790 µM[81]
Green tea and, rose, rosemary, sage, thyme and peppermint herbal teas in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 24 h incubationFOX assay (absorptiometric)ca. 1.1, 0.4, 0.3, 0.4, 0.25 and 0 mM, respectively[84]
Oolong tea, black tea, coffee, frozen dried coffee in PET bottles, freshly openedFOX assay (absorptiometric)0.03–0.07 mM, ca. 0.05 mM, ca. 0.04 mM and ca. 0.1 mM, respectively[83]
Oolong tea, black tea, coffee, frozen dried coffee in PET bottles, after 24-h incubation at 25 °CFOX assay (absorptiometric)0.22–0.44 mM, ca 0.54 mM, ca. 0.36 mM and ca. 0.35 mM[83]
Green tea packed in a PET bottle (Japan), 24 h after openingFOX assay (absorptiometric)665 ± 22 µM[85]
Green tea, 1 bag/200 mL of distilled or tap water, 3-h incubation, 21 °CFOX assay (absorptiometric)25 and 88 µM, respectively[32]
Green, white, black and red tea, 15 min after brewingFOX assay (absorptiometric)53, 50, 73 and 47 µM, respectively[80]
Rooibos, yerba mate and cocoa, 15 min after brewingFOX assay (absorptiometric)54, 67 and 38 µM, respectively[80]
Coffee; thyme and rosemary extracts, 15 min after brewingFOX assay (absorptiometric)44, 53 and 42 µM, respectively[80]
Coffee, 5 mg/mL phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 24 h, 37 °CFOX assay (absorptiometric)240 µM[81]
Twelve preparations of coffee, freshly preparedSpectrophotometric, with Phenol Red and HRPNone in 6 preparations; 3–29 µM in 6 preparations[121]
Instant coffee, 15 mg/mL, soon after preparation at 37 °C or 80 °COxygen electrode0.1 and 0.15 µM, respectively[122]
Instant coffee (100 mg/mL, 24-h incubation)Oxygen electrodeca. 1000 ppm = 2.94 mM[123]
Infusions of Betula leaves, Polygonum, Lavandula and Tilia inflorescence. 1-h incubation, room temperatureFOX assay (absorptiometric)54, 37, 34 and 28 µM, respectively[94]
Boiled homogenates of broad bean in deionized water, tap water and phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (1 g/2 mL)FOX assay (absorptiometric)22.8, 28.1 and 76.0 µM, respectively[91]
Boiled homogenates of broccoli, onion and leek (1 g/2 mL of phosphate buffer, pH 7.4)FOX assay (absorptiometric)25, 9 and 12 µM, respectively[91]
Boiled black carrot homogenate, 1 g/5 mL in tap water and phosphate buffer, pH 7.4FOX assay (absorptiometric)8.7 and 55.0 µM, respectively[92]
Commercial orange juices, AustraliaFOX assay (absorptiometric)2.26–8.88 µM (fresh), 4.99–14.51 µM (preserved)[96]
Diluted Pinot and Merlot wines, 30-min incubation at 30 °CFluorimetric, with Ampliflu Red and HRP12–16 µM[99]
Xadrez (white) and Varna (red) wines, 3 d after openingFOX assay (absorptiometric)ca 18 and 32 µM, respectively[100]
Ten beers, 4-fold dilutedFOX assay (absorptiometric)0.4–7.9 µM[102]
Brandy and whiskyFOX assay (absorptiometric)2.2 and 21.6 µM, respectively[102]
Dogwood, quince, hazelnut and apricot tincturesFOX assay (absorptiometric)8.7, 22.8, 23.3 and 48.3 µM, respectively[102]
FOX, Ferrous Oxidation-Xylenol Orange; Hb, hemoglobin; HRP, horseradish peroxidase.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sadowska-Bartosz, I.; Bartosz, G. Hydrogen Peroxide: A Ubiquitous Component of Beverages and Food. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 3397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073397

AMA Style

Sadowska-Bartosz I, Bartosz G. Hydrogen Peroxide: A Ubiquitous Component of Beverages and Food. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(7):3397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073397

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sadowska-Bartosz, Izabela, and Grzegorz Bartosz. 2025. "Hydrogen Peroxide: A Ubiquitous Component of Beverages and Food" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 7: 3397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073397

APA Style

Sadowska-Bartosz, I., & Bartosz, G. (2025). Hydrogen Peroxide: A Ubiquitous Component of Beverages and Food. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(7), 3397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073397

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop