Next Article in Journal
Loss of Mitochondrial Genetic Diversity in Overexploited Mediterranean Swordfish (Xiphias gladius, 1759) Population
Previous Article in Journal
Cave Communities: From the Surface Border to the Deep Darkness
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simultaneous Metabarcoding of Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes to Elucidate the Community Structures within Tardigrade Microhabitats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Final Note of Special Issue “Tardigrades Taxonomy, Biology and Ecology”

by
Łukasz Kaczmarek
Department of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 6, 61-614 Poznań, Poland
Diversity 2020, 12(5), 169; https://doi.org/10.3390/d12050169
Submission received: 19 April 2020 / Accepted: 20 April 2020 / Published: 25 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tardigrades Taxonomy, Biology and Ecology)

Abstract

:
Tardigrada (water bears) are microscopic invertebrates inhabiting aquatic (freshwater and marine) and terrestrial habitats. They are thriving in almost all Earth ecosystems from deepest oceans to highest mountains, from tropics to polar regions. Water bears are probably most famous for their cryptobiotic abilities, which allow them to survive a broad spectrum of extreme environmental conditions. The Special Issue on tardigrades was launched to popularize research on these fascinating microinvertebrates. The published papers were focused on (a) marine and terrestrial tardigrades diversity, (b) interpopulation variability of Antarctic eutardigrade Paramacrobiotus fairbanksi, (c) encystment in freshwater eutardigrade Thulinius ruffoi and (d) use of a metabarcoding approach to community structures studies in microenvironments.

Tardigrada (known colloquially as water bears or moss piglets) are microscopic invertebrates inhabiting aquatic (freshwater and marine) and terrestrial habitats. They are very frequent in almost all of Earth’s ecosystems from deepest oceans to highest mountains, from tropics to polar regions. They can be found in lichens, mosses, soil and aquatic sediments [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Tardigrades are relatively poorly known, up to now ca. 1300 species of tardigrades have been described [7] and new species are still being described every year (http://www.tardigrada.net/newsletter/index.htm.). Water bears have a bilaterally symmetrical body and four pairs of legs mostly terminating in claws. A tardigrade’s body is divided into a head (cephalic) segment and four trunk segments each bearing a pair of legs. Body length ranges from 50 μm in marine or juveniles of freshwater or terrestrial, to 1200 μm in adults with an average of 250–500 μm. The cuticle is soft in Eutardigrada or covered by cuticular plates in Heterotardigrada. They have a complete digestive system and body cavity, with numerous free-floating storage cells, which is responsible for respiration and circulation. The nervous system consists of a simple brain and a ventral nerve chain with four bilobed ganglia. Tardigrades are bisexual, parthenogenetic or hermaphroditic [1]. Tardigrades can be herbivorous and feed on algae, bacteria or plant cells; carnivorous, feeding mainly on microscopic invertebrates such as rotifers or nematodes, but also on other tardigrades; or omnivorous and feed both on plants and invertebrates, see [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Water bears are probably the most famous for their cryptobiotic abilities, which allow them to survive a broad spectrum of extreme environmental conditions, e.g., lack of water, very low and high temperatures, ionizing radiation, starvation, lack of oxygen, high levels of different types of chemicals or space vacuum, see [9,10,11,12]. What is even more exciting, tardigrades can possibly “cheat death” and do not age during anhydrobiosis [13].
Although the tardigrades are known in general, there are numerous knowledge gaps to be fulfilled. For this reason, as a guest editor, I thought about proposing the Special Issue: “Tardigrades Taxonomy, Biology and Ecology” in the Diversity journal. Overall, five papers were published, providing novel insights into this fascinating group of invertebrate animals.
Janelt and Poprawa [14] analyzed the poorly studied phenomenon of encystment in the freshwater eutardigrade, Thulinius ruffoi (Bertolani [15]). Authors described in detail a process of cyst formation, as well as the morphology of cysts and animals inside the cyst. In the main conclusions, they stated that the cyst capsule is composed of three cuticle layers. Cuticle layers are increasingly simplified (from outside to inside). Tardigrades inside the cyst are covered with a cuticle that develops like nonencysted specimens of this species and possesses claws and produces only one functional buccal-pharyngeal apparatus [14].
Gomes-Júnior et al. [16] studied deep sea (between 150 and 3000 m bsl) tardigrades of the genus Coronarctus Renaud-Mornant [17] from the south-western Atlantic Ocean and described three species new for science. The authors also discussed the most important morphological characters in the genus and presented identification key to all known Coronarctus species [16].
Berdi and Altındağ [18] studied terrestrial tardigrades in the province of Karabük (Turkey) and reported two species, Echiniscus granulatus (Doyère [19]) and Diaforobiotus islandicus (Richters [20]), new for this province. Moreover, the authors provided a current checklist of tardigrade species reported from Turkey, indicating their localities and geographic distribution [18].
In the next paper of the SI, Kaczmarek et al. [21] focused on terrestrial Antarctic tardigrades. Authors reported eight tardigrade taxa from this region including parthenogenetic Paramacrobiotus fairbanksi Schill, Förster, Dandekar and Wolf [22], which are considered by authors as cosmopolitan species which confirm the “everything is everywhere” hypothesis. Moreover, Kaczmarek et al. [21] analyzed morphological and genetic differences between the few populations of Pam. fairbanksi from distant localities and small statistically important genetic and morphological differences were shown.
Arakawa [23] studied community structures within xeric and mesic mosses. The author used metabarcoding to identify all prokaryotes and eukaryotes, including tardigrades. In xeric mosses xerophilic tardigrades and other anhydrobiotic invertebrates seem to have limited diversity and the prokaryotic population was dominated by cyanobacteria, which suggests that in such environments only organisms resistant to extreme desiccation are able to survive. In conclusion, such combined metabarcoding approaches can be highly useful to study community structures within microscopic ecosystems, i.e., microecology [23].
As a guest editor for this Special Issue, I would like to express my gratitude to all the authors for their contributors and the reviewers for their work in the manuscript evaluations. I am confident that this Special Issue not only shows the diversity of studies carried out in the field of tardigrades but also will inspire different research teams to conduct subsequent investigations and further explore this fascinating phylum of microinvertebrates.
I also want to thank the staff members at the MDPI editorial (in particular Ms. Wei Zhang and Ms. Emma Li, managing editors) for their support during the editorial process.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nelson, D.R.; Guidetti, R.; Rebecchi, L. Phylum tardigrada. In Vol. 1: Thorp and Covich’s Freshwater Invertebrates, 4th ed.; Ecology and General Biology; Elsevier Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 347–380. [Google Scholar]
  2. McInnes, S.J. Zoogeographic distribution of terrestrial/freshwater tardigrades from current literature. J. Nat. Hist. 1994, 28, 257–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kaczmarek, Ł.; Michalczyk, Ł.; McInnes, S.J. Annotated zoogeography of non-marine Tardigrada. Part I: Central America. Zootaxa 2014, 3763, 1–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kaczmarek, Ł.; Michalczyk, Ł.; McInnes, S.J. Annotated zoogeography of non-marine Tardigrada. Part II: South America. Zootaxa 2015, 3923, 1–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kaczmarek, Ł.; Michalczyk, Ł.; McInnes, S.J. Annotated zoogeography of non-marine Tardigrada. Part III: North America and Greenland. Zootaxa 2016, 4203, 1–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. McInnes, S.J.; Michalczyk, Ł.; Kaczmarek, Ł. Annotated zoogeography of non-marine Tardigrada. Part IV: Africa. Zootaxa 2017, 4284, 1–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Degma, P.; Bertolani, R.; Guidetti, R. Actual Checklist of Tardigrada Species (2009–2019, 35th Edition: 31-07-2019). 2019. Available online: https://iris.unimore.it/retrieve/handle/11380/1178608/226739/Actual%20checklist%20of%20Tardigrada%2035th%20Edition.pdf (accessed on 19 April 2020). [CrossRef]
  8. Roszkowska, M.; Bartels, P.J.; Gołdyn, B.; Ciobanu, D.; Fontoura, P.; Michalczyk, Ł.; Nelson, D.R.; Ostrowska, M.; Moreno-Talamantes, A.; Kaczmarek, Ł. Is the gut content of Milnesium (Eutardigrada) related to buccal tube size? Zool. J. Linnean Soc. 2016, 178, 794–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Rebecchi, L.; Altiero, T.; Guidetti, R. Anhydrobiosis: The extreme limit of desiccation tolerance. Invert. Surviv. J. 2007, 4, 65–81. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wełnicz, W.; Grohme, M.A.; Kaczmarek, Ł.; Schill, R.O.; Frohme, M. Anhydrobiosis in tardigrades—The last decade. J. Insect Physiol. 2011, 57, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Guidetti, R.; Rizzo, A.M.; Altiero, T.; Rebecchi, L. What can we learn from the toughest animals of the Earth? Water bears (tardigrades) as multicellular model organisms in order to perform scientific preparations for lunar exploration. Planet. Space Sci. 2012, 74, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Erdmann, W.; Kaczmarek, Ł. Tardigrade in space research-past and future. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 2017, 47, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kaczmarek, Ł.; Roszkowska, M.; Fontaneto, D.; Jezierska, M.; Pietrzak, B.; Wieczorek, R.; Poprawa, I.; Kosicki, J.Z.; Karachitos, A.; Kmita, H. Staying young and fit? Ontogenetic and phylogenetic consequences of animal anhydrobiosis. J. Zool. 2019, 309, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Janelt, K.; Poprawa, I. Analysis of encystment, excystment, and cyst structure in freshwater eutardigrade Thulinius ruffoi (Tardigrada, Isohypsibioidea: Doryphoribiidae). Diversity 2020, 12, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bertolani, R. Tardigradi Guide Per Il Riconoscimento Delle Specie Animali Delle Acque Interne Italiane; CNR Press: Verona, Italy, 1982; pp. 1–104. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gomes-Júnior, E.; Santos, É.; da Rocha, C.M.C.; Santos, P.J.P.; Fontoura, P. The deep-sea genus Coronarctus (Tardigrada, Arthrotardigrada) in Brazil, south-western Atlantic Ocean, with the description of three new species. Diversity 2020, 12, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Renaud-Mornant, J. Une nouvelle famille de Tardigrades marins abyssaux: Les Coronarctidae fam. nov. (Heterotardigrada). CR Acad. Sci. 1974, 278, 3087–3090. [Google Scholar]
  18. Berdi, D.; Altındağ, A. Contribution to the Knowledge on Distribution of Tardigrada in Turkey. Diversity 2020, 12, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Doyère, P.L.N. Memoire sur les Tardigrades. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. Paris Series 2 1840, 14, 269–362. [Google Scholar]
  20. Richters, F. Isländische Tardigraden. Zool. Anz 1904, 28, 373–377. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaczmarek, Ł.; Mioduchowska, M.; Kačarević, U.; Kubska, K.; Parnikoza, I.; Gołdyn, B.; Roszkowska, M. New records of Antarctic Tardigrada with comments on interpopulation variability of the Paramacrobiotus fairbanksi Schill, Förster, Dandekar and Wolf, 2010. Diversity 2020, 12, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Schill, R.O.; Forster, F.; Dandekar, T.; Wolf, N. Using compensatory base change analysis of internal transcribed spacer 2 secondary structures to identify three new species in Paramacrobiotus (Tardigrada). Org. Divers. Evol. 2010, 10, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arakawa, K. Simultaneous metabarcoding of eukaryotes and prokaryotes to elucidate the community structures within tardigrade microhabitats. Diversity 2020, 12, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaczmarek, Ł. Final Note of Special Issue “Tardigrades Taxonomy, Biology and Ecology”. Diversity 2020, 12, 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12050169

AMA Style

Kaczmarek Ł. Final Note of Special Issue “Tardigrades Taxonomy, Biology and Ecology”. Diversity. 2020; 12(5):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12050169

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaczmarek, Łukasz. 2020. "Final Note of Special Issue “Tardigrades Taxonomy, Biology and Ecology”" Diversity 12, no. 5: 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12050169

APA Style

Kaczmarek, Ł. (2020). Final Note of Special Issue “Tardigrades Taxonomy, Biology and Ecology”. Diversity, 12(5), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12050169

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop