Next Article in Journal
Breeding Density and Collision Mortality of Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area
Next Article in Special Issue
Salt Marsh Restoration for the Provision of Multiple Ecosystem Services
Previous Article in Journal
Contrasting Patterns of Sensory Adaptation in Living and Extinct Flightless Birds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Environmental Pressures on Top-Down and Bottom-Up Forces in Coastal Ecosystems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Accumulation and Effect of Heavy Metals on the Germination and Growth of Salsola vermiculata L. Seedlings

by
Israel Sanjosé
1,
Francisco Navarro-Roldán
1,2,3,*,
María Dolores Infante-Izquierdo
1,
Gloria Martínez-Sagarra
4,
Juan Antonio Devesa
4,
Alejandro Polo
1,
Sara Ramírez-Acosta
2,5,
Enrique Sánchez-Gullón
1,
Francisco Javier Jiménez-Nieva
1 and
Adolfo Francisco Muñoz-Rodríguez
1,5
1
Department of Integrated Sciences, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Huelva, 21004 Huelva, Spain
2
International Agrofood Campus of Excellence International ceiA3, University of Huelva, 21004 Huelva, Spain
3
International Campus of Excellence of the Sea—CEIMAR, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Huelva, 21004 Huelva, Spain
4
Department of Botany, Ecology and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Sciences, José Celestino Mutis Building, Campus de Rabanales, University of Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
5
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Huelva, 21004 Huelva, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2021, 13(11), 539; https://doi.org/10.3390/d13110539
Submission received: 8 September 2021 / Revised: 14 October 2021 / Accepted: 24 October 2021 / Published: 27 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conservation and Ecological Restoration of Intertidal Marshes)

Abstract

:
The influence of different concentrations of heavy metals (Cu, Mn, Ni, Zn) was analyzed in the Salsola vermiculata germination pattern, seedling development, and accumulation in seedlings. The responses to different metals were dissimilar. Germination was only significantly reduced at Cu and Zn 4000 μM but Zn induced radicle growth at lower concentrations. Without damage, the species acted as a good accumulator and tolerant for Mn, Ni, and Cu. In seedlings, accumulation increased following two patterns: Mn and Ni, induced an arithmetic increase in content in tissue, to the point where the content reached a maximum; with Cu and Ni, the pattern was linear, in which the accumulation in tissue was directly related to the metal concentration in the medium. Compared to other Chenopodiaceae halophyte species, S. vermiculata seems to be more tolerant of metals and is proposed for the phytoremediation of soils contaminated by heavy metals.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Heavy metals, due to their high toxicity, persistence, and bioaccumulative behavior, could represent a threat to natural ecosystems, especially in estuary zones with salt marshes [1,2]. They can impact biochemical processes in plants, including nutrient homeostasis, gas exchange characteristics, enzyme and antioxidant production, protein mobilization, and photosynthesis [3].
Soil-restoration technologies are available such as chemical/physical remediation, animal remediation, phytoremediation, and microremediation with microbes [4]. Phytoremediation, or green remediation, uses plants that absorb the heavy metal by the roots, absorbing or removing environmental contaminants; this technology has gained in importance in the last two decades for being cost-efficient, environmentally friendly, producing fewer side-effects, and with no negative impact on landscaping methods [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. In the phytoremediation processes, plants assume various roles in diminishing the effects of metals: phytoextraction by the harvest of above-ground organs where metals concentrate; phytovolatilization by water-soluble metals during transpiration; phytostabilization by immobilization through accumulation by roots or precipitation, or by changing their chemistry; phytodegradation by degradation into insoluble or non-toxic compounds; or phytoaccumulation by accumulation in plant biomass [12,13,14,15,16].
In green remediation strategies, it is necessary to analyze the different properties of species to determine tolerance to contaminants and accumulative behavior [10]; phytotolerance studies are required to determine metal tolerance in plant species and to understand the negative effect of metals on metabolism and the processes in those species [17]. In this regard, seed germination and the seedling stage are more vulnerable to metal stress than later vegetative stages; therefore, testing the effects of metal stress on these processes is useful for assessing a species’ establishment potential in metal-contaminated soils [18,19]. The effects of heavy metals on seed germination have been widely studied [20,21], with some of the most common effects being germination rate reduction or damage to seedlings, including a reduction in the elongation and growth of roots, shoots, or leaves, which could kill the seedlings [22,23].
Although the seed coat can act as a barrier to limit the effects of heavy metals [24], most seeds and seedlings show a decline in germination and vigor in response to the presence of heavy metals; processes affected include imbibition [25], or the activity of certain enzymes involved in reserve mobilization, such as acid phosphatases, proteases, amylases, and proteolytic enzymes [26]. Heavy metals can also cause oxidative stress and damage the seedlings’ photosynthetic systems [3].
In saline soils, some halophytic plants are now widely accepted as solutions for cleaning up coastal environments [12,27], acting as bioindicators or biomonitors to assess the extent of heavy metal contamination on sediments, due to the linear correlation coefficients between the concentration of metals in their tissue and concentration in the soil, or by contributing to the phytoremediation process by accumulating metals at higher concentrations [1,2,14,16,28].
The Halophytes’ accumulative capacity could be the result of different mechanisms. The amount of salt in the soil affects the accumulation of metals in tissue [29,30], and its presence can alleviate the effects of metal toxicity [14,31]. Furthermore, halophytic plant species can reduce the effects of metals in other ways: by retaining the ion intake in structures used to accumulate salts, such as the cell wall, vacuole, or trichome; by using substances for metal chelation; or possessing antioxidant defense systems [14,16,32,33].
The Chenopodiaceae family contributes the largest number of halophyte species [34], and they are dominant in Mediterranean tidal marsh vegetation [35,36]. The Chenopodiaceae family is not included in the predominant families in heavy metal accumulation processes [11]; however, many halophyte species have been studied as potential accumulators of metals in saline soils, and they may be considered a valuable species for the phytoremediation of metal-polluted saline soils.
The most widely studied species are Halimione portulacoides Aellen, Sarcocornia fruticosa (L.) A.J. Scott, and Ariplex halimus L. [16]. Halimione portulacoides is considered a suitable accumulator for Hg, Cr, Cu, Cd, and Pb, contributing to their phytostabilization [37,38,39,40,41,42]; this species also uses surfactants that affect the mobility of metals in the rhizosphere and has stabilization potential for Cr and Cu [43]. Sarcocornia fruticosa accumulates As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn in below-ground biomass in concentrations several times higher than concentrations of the metals in soil [40,44,45]. This has been demonstrated in phytoremediation of a metal-contaminated saline soil project, using liming to stimulate plant growth and enhance its capacity to stabilize metals [46]. Ariplex halimus has proved to be well-suited for the phytoextraction of Cd, Cu, and Zn found in saline soils [14,47,48,49,50,51].
Other species of Chenopodiaceae considered as accumulators for phytoaccumulation or phytostabilization are: Arthrocnemum macrostachyum (Moric.) K. Koch [42,52]; Atriplex hortensis L. and A. rosea L. [53]; A. lentiformis (Torr.) S. Watson and A. undulata (Moq.) D. Dietr. [54]; A. atacamensis Phil. [55]; Hammada scoparia Iljin [56]; Salicornia europaea L. [29]; Salicornia ramosissima J. Woods [57]; Salsola fruticosa Forssk. [42,58]; S. glauca M. Bieb. [59]; S. passerina Bunge [9]; S. soda L. [29]; Sarcocornia perennis (Mill.) A.J. Scott [37,40]; Suaeda glauca (Bunge) Bunge [60]; S. maritima (L.) Dumort. [61]; S. salsa (l.) Pall. [62]; Salicornia arabica L. [42]. Salicornia bigelovii Torr. has been tested for phytovolatilization of Se [63].
Salsola vermiculata is a shrub of wide distribution and ecological amplitude and is an important structural element in the vegetation of the arid and coastal zones of southern Europe, northern Africa, Macaronesia, and southwestern Asia [64]. This species disperses its seeds by wind during autumn and winter and is covered by a permanent calyx; its seeds have a high germination rate at low–medium salinities (to 0.3 M), and high recovery potential when exposed to fresh water following high salinity stress (0.6–0.9 M) [65]. In marshes in the southwestern Iberian Peninsula, it inhabits sandy sediments in high marsh areas only flooded during astronomic tides [36]. This species is widely distributed in the Odiel Natural Park Marshes (SW Spain) [35,66], which is one of the most heavily metal-polluted systems in the world, mainly as a result of the upstream presence of the Iberian Pyrite Belt (IPB), an important metal-rich sulfide deposit and, secondly, due to industrial activity on the estuary [67,68,69]. These findings would bolster its importance in restoration by phytoremediation in such habitats.
Salsola vermiculata was tested at mining sites in Morocco by Boularbah et al. [70], who analyzed its Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn content in shoots and its toxicity. They concluded that the species is hypertolerant, accumulating 3.14, 69.5, 283.9, and 819 mg kg−1 DW of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn, respectively, with no toxic effects; thus, it can be used for phytostabilization in metal-contaminated sites.
For the first time, this work investigates the germination of Salsola vermiculata under exposure to metals, including Ni, in marsh environments. The analysis is compared to the effects of four heavy metals, Cu, Mn, Zn, and Ni, on the germination and initial seedling development of S. vermiculata to determine their accumulation in seedlings in order to evaluate its possible use in marsh ecosystem restoration by phytoremediation. The results are compared to those obtained for other Chenopodiaceae halophytes tested for heavy metal accumulation or tolerance.
Although the study of other metals such as Cd, Cr, and Co may be of great interest, the metals analyzed in this study are the most representative of those present in the Odiel marshes and, therefore, those which can have the greatest effect on its flora.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Seeds were collected from the Odiel Marshes (37°08′–37°20′ N, 6°45′–7°02′ W; Spain, southwestern Iberian Peninsula) on 5 October 2016, from more than 10 different individual plants randomly selected, cleaned under a magnifying glass and separated from the floral parts. Seeds from different plants were mixed and stored for 12 days in paper bags at 25 °C in dark conditions prior to the germination experiments.

2.2. Germination Experiments

The seeds were surface-sterilized by immersion in 5% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 10 min and rinsed three times in sterile water [65,71]. Next, the seeds were placed in Petri dishes (9 cm in diameter) with three layers of autoclaved filter paper, watered with 5 mL of different treatment solutions, and sealed with adhesive tape (Parafilm TM) to avoid desiccation. Three Petri dishes with 25 seeds per dish were used in each treatment. Although other methods exist, a seed germination test with a heavy metal solution in a Petri dish with moistened filter paper is the most common methodology for assessing metal phytotoxicity in plant species [72].
The seeds were exposed to eight different concentrations (10, 25, 50, 100, 250, 1000, 2000, 4000 μM) of Cu, Mn, Ni, and Zn added in the form of sulfates CuSO4 5H2O, MnSO4 H2O, NiSO4 6H2O, and ZnSO4 7H2O and dissolved in deionized water. For the control treatment (0 µM) only deionized water was used. The sulfate form of the metals was selected according to the most abundant form found in the Odiel Natural Park Marshes [73] and references therein.
These metals are essential for plants that contribute to plant metabolic function, but excessive amounts are toxic and lead to growth inhibition [21,25]. They were chosen based on previous studies that describe the metal composition in the water and soils of the Odiel Natural Park Marshes [21] and references therein.
The seeds were germinated under controlled environmental conditions with 12/12 h of day/night at 24/20 °C, respectively; it has been demonstrated that such conditions are appropriate for stimulating high levels of germination in Atriplex halimus [71] and other Chenopodiaceae, including Salsola vermiculata [65]. Light was provided by fluorescent lamps that produced a photosynthetic photon flux density of 60 μmol m−2 s−1. Germination was monitored for 30 days, with germination in each plate recorded daily in the first week and every 2 or 3 days thereafter. A seed was considered germinated when the radicle emerged.
The germination dynamic was analyzed by noting the final germination percentage after 30 days, and the number of days necessary to reach 50% of the final germination percentage (t50) for each Petri dish.

2.3. Morphological Analysis of the Seedlings

To analyze the influence of the different treatments on seedling development, the length of the cotyledons, hypocotyls, and radicles were measured in 15-day-old seedlings, using 10 seedlings per dish. The measurements were taken under a magnifying glass [21,71,74].
To assess the tolerance of the seedlings to metals, the tolerance index was calculated according to Wilkins [75], applied to the length of the cotyledons, hypocotyls, and radicles (TI% = 100 × (mean organ length in the treatment/mean organ length in the control) [76,77].

2.4. Metal Content Analysis

To better understand whether the metals were taken up by the seedlings, whole 15-day-old seedlings (approximately 45 per metal and treatment) were carefully washed with ultrapure water, thoroughly dried, pulverized with mortar and pestle, and stored in hermetically sealed polypropylene tubes at 4 °C until analysis. Mass ratios between different parts could have changed as a result of treatments; therefore, accumulation in the whole seedling was only used as indicative of increased accumulation when the seedlings were exposed to increasing concentrations.
For the metal analysis, 50 mg of a powdered sample were mixed with 640 µL HNO3 and 160 µL of H2O2 in polytetrafluoroethylene vessels and incubated for 10 min. Mineralization (CEM Matthews microwave oven, NC, USA, model MARS) was carried out at 800 W at room temperature, ramped to 180 °C for 10 min, and then maintained for 20 min at that temperature. Then, the solutions were prepared with up to 5 mL of ultrapure water, and the metals were analyzed with an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) Thermo XSeries2 (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a MicroMist nebulizer, Ni cones, and a Cetac ASX-500 autosampler (Agilent, Wilmington, DE, USA). Rh was added as an internal standard (100 ppb) from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). All analyses were performed in triplicate.

2.5. Statistical Analyzes

The statistical analyses of the data were performed using Statistica 8.0. The data were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Levene tests, respectively. As data did not follow a normal distribution, Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to detect significant differences (p < 0.05).
The metal accumulations in seedlings at each metal concentration medium were fitted to polynomial curves type y = ax2 + bx + c, and the threshold value of the model was based on R2 and p values (p < 0.05).

3. Results

The final germination and the germination dynamics of S. vermiculata were minimally affected by the presence of metals in the germination media, with some differences depending on the metal (Table 1). Copper and zinc significantly reduced the final germination compared to the control when present at the highest concentration, 4000 μM. However, only zinc had a significant effect on the germination dynamics, with a considerable increase in the time-lapse to reach 50% of germination when present at 4000 μM, rising from 1.43 days in the control to 1.77 days at this concentration.
The initial development of the seedlings was affected by the presence of metals in different ways (Table 1, Figure 1). Copper did not affect the length of the cotyledons, but at 4000 μM it significantly reduced the length of the hypocotyls to 46% of the control, and the length of the radicle was significantly affected from 250 μM, with a reduction of 71% at 250 μM and 28% at 4000 μM (Table 1, Figure 1A). Manganese, at the concentrations tested, did not statistically affect the initial development of S. vermiculata seedlings (Table 1, Figure 1B). The presence of nickel significantly reduced the length of the cotyledon at 4000 μM to 85% of the control, and the length of the hypocotyl decreased from 2000 μM to around 70% of the control; the length of the radicle was 69% of the control at 2000 μM and 31% at 4000 μM (Table 1, Figure 1C). Zinc did not affect either the length of the cotyledons or the length of the hypocotyls at any of the concentrations tested; however, this metal induced the growth of the radicle at smaller concentrations (50 μM) reaching 130% of the control, but had a negative effect at 4000 μM, with a significant reduction in radicle length to 49% of the control (Table 1, Figure 1D).
As shown in Figure 2, the metal content inside the seedlings rose significantly with the increase in metal in the germination media, reaching the following maximum mean values: 9186 mg kg−1 DW of Cu at 4000 μM; 4373 and 4676 mg kg−1 DW of Mn at 2000, and 4000 μM, respectively; 3990 and 3204 mg kg−1 DW of Zn at 2000 and 4000 μM, respectively; 7130 mg kg−1 DW of Ni at 4000 μM. However, the behavior is different for each metal studied.
Accumulation curves can fit significantly (p < 0.05) to second-degree polynomials. The equation presents a high positive value for component “a” in the case of copper; therefore, the accumulation increases exponentially with the increase in copper in the medium. However, nickel registers a very low value for component “a”; therefore, the increase in accumulated metal rises arithmetically as its concentration in the culture medium increases. On the other hand, manganese and zinc behave similarly, with a negative “a” component, which means that when a concentration value is reached, the accumulation of metal in the tissue begins to decrease.

4. Discussion

4.1. Copper

In our study, copper reduced the final germination percentage at 4000 μM but had no effect at concentrations of 2000 μM or lower and did not affect the speed of germination (t50). These results are the same for other Chenopodiaceae plants from the Odiel marshes, such as Atriplex halimus and Salicornia ramosissima, studied by Márquez-García et al. [21].
In addition, copper concentration affected seedling development in hypocotyl growth at 4000 μM and reduced the length of radicles at concentrations up to 250 μM, with significant reductions over 1000 μM, falling below 40% of the control length. Salsola vermiculata exhibited a greater tolerance than Atriplex halimus and Salicornia ramosissima, in which cotyledon and hypocotyl development was affected from 1000 and 2000 μM, respectively. Radicle development was affected in the same way, being reduced from 250 and 1000 μM in both species, respectively [21]. The biggest effect of Cu on the root was due to its accumulation mainly in this organ, with little translocation to the shoots [50,78].
In sensitive plants, Cu can become toxic when it accumulates in plant tissue at levels exceeding 20 mg kg−1 dry weight; these data differ according to plant species and growth conditions [79]. Our results showed that copper in Salsola vermiculata reached levels of 1664 and 9186 mg kg−1 DW, grown in solutions of 2000 and 4000 μM, respectively. However, it presented the first negative effects on the radicle at concentrations of 250 μM, the plants remained unaffected when cultivated in 100 μM solution, accumulating 154 mg kg−1 DW. These data match those of Boularbah et al. [70], who found Cu content of 69.5 mg kg−1 DW in mining sites in Morocco, with no toxicity symptoms.
The accumulator capacity of Salsola vermiculata seems to be higher than that of Atriplex halimus, which Mateos-Naranjo et al. [50] studied in the Odiel marshes, where they detected clear phytotoxicity symptoms at tissue concentrations greater than 38 mg kg−1 DW.
The maximum concentrations of this metal registered in the Odiel Marshes Natural Park ranged from 500 to 1000 μM. In halophytes in this estuary, Luque et al. [80] found Cu accumulations that ranged from 12.3 mg kg−1 DW in Halimione portulacoides to 878 mg kg−1 DW in Zostera noltii Hornem., and at the same location Park, Stenner, and Nikless [81] found in the latter species accumulations in tissue of 1350 mg kg−1 DW. These levels are far superior to the data collected by other authors for these species in other estuaries around the world [1,2], which clearly demonstrates the high level of contamination in the Odiel Marshes Natural Park.
As described previously, the Cu accumulation curve equation presents a high positive value for component “a”; therefore, the accumulation rises exponentially with the increase in the metal in the medium, which matches Kabata-Pendias and Pendias [79], who established that Cu concentration rises exponentially when concentrations in the medium increase. This also fits with observations by Mateos-Naranjo et al. [50] in Atriplex halimus and with the accumulation in Arctium tomentosum Mill. observed by Al Harbawee et al. [77], and in roots, shoots, and leaves of Sesuvium portulacastrum (L.) L. studied by Feng et al. [82]. This exponential accumulation could be linked to damage in the roots, which impacts negatively on the root transport system. This could be explained by the fact that at lower concentrations the relation between the concentration of the metal in the medium and tissue is arithmetic [9,83].

4.2. Manganese

In our work, manganese did not affect the final germination percentage or the germination dynamics of Salsola vermiculata, which coincides with data on Atriplex halimus and Salicornia ramosissima, other Chenopodiaceae plants from the Odiel marshes presented by Márquez-García et al. [21]. Neither did it affect Salsola vermiculata seedling development in concentrations up to 4000 μM. Márquez-García et al. [21] found that manganese had no effect on the cotyledons or hypocotyls of Atriplex halimus and Salicornia ramosissima in concentrations up to 2000 μM, but there was an increase in radicle length at 10 μM and a reduction in concentrations over 250 μM in Atriplex halimus, and over 2000 μM in Salicornia ramosissima.
Normal Mn content differs greatly between species (30–500 mg kg−1 DW) [84]. The threshold of damage caused by Mn depends on the plant species and cultivars or genotypes within a species [85,86]. In general, plants are negatively affected by Mn concentrations above 500 ppm, although concentrations over 1000 ppm have been described in tolerant species [79].
Salsola vermiculata reached levels of up to 4675 mg kg−1 DW, grown in solutions up to 4000 μM, without presenting any negative effects. By contrast, this metal significantly curtailed the growth of Suaeda glauca when accumulation in tissue reached approximately 1000 mg kg−1 DW [60], revealing, for the first time, that Salsola vermiculata is a better accumulator for this metal.
Mn is present in the Odiel marshes at maximum concentrations of between 50 and 500 μM, occupying third place in metal concentration in plant tissue in these marshes, behind Fe and Zn, and its concentrations range from 25.4 mg kg−1 DW in Arthrocnemum macrostachyum plants to 1960 mg kg−1 DW in Zostera noltii [80].
Accumulation of Mn in seedlings increased to 4373 mg kg−1 DW when exposed to 2000 μM, and maintained this level in higher concentrations, reaching 4676 mg kg−1 DW at 4000 μM Mn. This behavior contrasts with that established by Kabata-Pendias and Pendias [79], who determined that Mn concentration in plants is proportional to its presence in soil, and with observations by Zhang et al. [60], who found arithmetic increases in Zn content in Suaeda glauca up to 2812 mg kg−1 DW. However, Lidon and Teixeira [87] observed, in Oryza sativa, a stabilization in accumulation when it reached 2000 mg kg−1 DW in the culture medium with concentrations that exceeded 8 mg L−1.

4.3. Nickel

In many plant species, increasing concentrations of Ni inhibit and delay seed germination and seedling growth, generally due to the suppression of amylase and protease activity [88,89,90,91,92,93,94]. However, this metal does not affect the final percentage of Salsola vermiculata germination, or germination dynamics, as was the case in Atriplex halimus and Salicornia ramosissima, other Chenopodiaceae plants from the Odiel marshes studied by Márquez-García et al. [21]. In some species, Ni improves both the rate and percentage of seed germination [22,88], but we did not observe this effect, perhaps due to the high percentage of germination in the control.
On the other hand, some authors state that this metal retards germination in crop plants [95], but this toxic effect was not observed in this study, in Salsola vermiculata, Atriplex halimus, or Salicornia ramosissima [21].
There are many examples of the toxic effects of Ni on seedlings that reduce their growth [93,96]. In the case of Salsola vermiculata, nickel reduces cotyledons at 4000 μM, diminishes hypocotyls at 2000 μM, and affects radicles from 2000 μM, causing a drastic reduction at 4000 μM. The threshold concentrations for damage observed in this species are higher than those observed in Atriplex halimus and Salicornia ramosissima, studied in the same location, with both species registering damage at 1000, 250, and 100 μM for cotyledons, hypocotyls, and radicle, respectively.
As we have described, the concentration of nickel required for normal growth in most plants is very low; from 0.05 to 0.1 mg kg−1 DW to 5 mg kg−1 DW, according to Kabata-Pendias and Pendias [79], from 10 mg kg−1 DW, in Ain et al. [90], or from 20–30 mg kg−1 DW, as described by White and Brown [97]. In most plants studied, Ni in tissue is toxic in concentrations from 10–100 mg kg−1 DW [79,91,98].
In our study, Salsola vermiculata seedlings reached levels of 7130 mg kg−1 DW when grown in 4000 μM of Ni medium, but the highest concentration at which toxic effects on seedlings were not observed was 1000 μM, accumulating in seedlings up to 1537 mg kg−1 DW.
In the Odiel estuary, this metal has been found in concentrations below 50 μM, and its accumulation in the plants studied ranged from 13.0 mg kg−1 DW in Salicornia ramosissima to 45.7 mg kg−1 DW in Spartina maritima (Curtis) Fernald [80].
At the concentration levels tested, accumulation of this metal increased arithmetically as concentrations in the medium rose, which is consistent with Lu et al. [9], who established that Ni concentrations in many plants positively correlated to concentrations in the medium. But this is only true until the medium concentration reaches a certain level [79]; this threshold varies in different species, for example, in Lepidium ruderale L. the threshold concentration in the medium was 20 μM, while it reached 30 μM in Capsella bursa-pastoris Moench [99]; it was 100 μM in Arctium tomentosum [77]; in Odontarrhena bracteata (Boiss and Buhse) Spaniel and O. inflata (Nyár.) D.A. German, the threshold was approximately 150 μM [100]; and in varieties of Brassica juncea (L.) Czern, it was 400 μM [96]. The persistence of Ni intake until the concentration in the medium of 4000 μM could indicate the non-existence of mechanisms involved in the control of Ni intake.

4.4. Zinc

Salsola vermiculata germination fell to 79.83% and was delayed at 4000 μM, but no effects were observed at lower concentrations, which coincides with figures for Atriplex halimus and Salicornia ramosissima reported by Márquez-García et al. [21], who did not observe any reduction at 2000 μM of Zn.
The Zn concentrations tested did not affect cotyledon or hypocotyl size, but at 50 μM the radicles of Salsola vermiculata seedlings were, significantly, 30% longer than the control; the effects of hormesis have also been observed in Medicago sativa L. [22]. Nevertheless, at 4000 μM a reduction of almost 50% was observed in the radicles. The study by Márquez-García et al. [21] of Atriplex halimus noted a reduction in cotyledons and hypocotyls at 2000 μM, and in radicles from 250 μM. They also described a reduction in the radicles of Salicornia ramosissima seedlings from 1000 μM, which demonstrates higher tolerance in Salsola vermiculata.
Most plants presented critical toxicity levels for this metal in their tissue from 100–500 mg kg−1 DW [79]. In Salsola vermiculata, Zn reached maximum accumulations of 3990 mg kg−1 DW when cultivated at 2000 μM, showing no seedling damage at this concentration. Our results are consistent with Boularbah et al. [70], who found Zn content of 819 mg kg−1 DW in mining areas in Morocco, with no toxicity symptoms.
The maximum concentrations of this metal recorded at the Odiel marshes ranged from 500 μM to 1000 μM, occupying second place in metal concentration in plant tissue in these marshes. In the plants studied, Zn accumulation ranged from 62.9 mg kg−1 DW in Arthrocnemum macrostachyum to 2440 mg kg−1 DW in Zostera noltii [80,81].
Accumulation of Zn in seedlings increased to 3990 mg kg−1 DW of Zn at 2000 μM, and maintained this level in higher concentrations, accumulating to 3204 mg kg−1 DW at 4000 μM, showing similar behavior to that observed for Mn. As in the case of Mn, Kabata-Pendias and Pendias [79] determined that Zn concentration in plants is proportional to its presence in the soil, but Al Harbawee et al. [77] observed similar dynamics to those we observed in Arctium tomentosum: that when concentrations in the medium increased to 1000 uM in the plate, they registered an arithmetic increase in accumulation, and the accumulation did not increase at the same rate when the concentration was higher. This was also observed by Pandey [101] in Raphanus sativus L. and Spinacia oleracea L., and by Kozhevnikova et al. [99] in Lepidium ruderale and Capsella bursa-pastoris. Nevertheless, Ivanov et al. [102], observed in Pinus sylvestris L. seedlings, that while Zn accumulation in the radicles increased proportionally to the concentration in the nutrient solution to 300 μM, the Zn content in leaves stabilized at a concentration of 150 μM.
Although plant metal intake behavior depends on the range of concentrations in the medium analyzed [103], some authors [104] have described three patterns for accumulations of heavy metals: as the concentration in the medium increases, (1) accumulator plants show an arithmetic increase in content in tissue to the point where content reaches a maximum level; (2) non-accumulators show a low level of accumulation in tissue until the concentration in the medium reaches a point where the restricting mechanism breaks down and there is unlimited accumulation, resulting in plant death; (3) a linear pattern in which the accumulation in tissue is directly related to the metal concentration in the medium. Observations in our study resemble the first pattern for Mn and Zn, the second pattern for Cu, and the third pattern in the case of Ni.

5. Conclusions

Under control group conditions, Salsola vermiculata reached germination levels of above 90%, in line with data previously published by Muñoz-Rodríguez et al. [65], with seeds from the same location and under the same conditions. In that study, S. vermiculata demonstrated its adaptation to soil salinity, germinating at above 90% in salinities of up to 0.2 M when planted without the calyx, and at over 80% with the calyx; even after exposure to 0.6 M salinities, they germinated in distilled water in a proportion higher than 80%.
Regarding the toxic effects of the metals studied, the roots are the primary target of the metals, and their growth is usually more severely affected than that of the aerial parts, probably since the roots are the first contact point with toxic elements and provide an entrance to the cellular structure inside the plant. This is confirmed by the results in our work, as the roots were affected at lower concentrations in the culture medium than the hypocotyls or cotyledons for all the metals tested.
Our results clearly show how Salsola vermiculata can tolerate the presence of metals and successfully germinate. With no toxic effects, its seedlings accumulate Cu up to 299 mg kg−1 DW, Mn up to 4675 mg kg−1 DW, Ni up to 1537 mg kg−1 DW, and Zn up to 2507 mg kg−1 DW.
Salsola vermiculata exhibits a higher tolerance to metals than other halophylous Chenopodiaceae species studied, such as Atriplex halimus and Salicornia ramosissima, both analyzed at the same location [21]; and higher than Salsola passerine, which is an accumulator for Ni, Cu, Cd, Cr, and Co [9].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.S., F.N.-R. and A.F.M.-R.; methodology, I.S., F.N.-R., M.D.I.-I., G.M.-S., J.A.D., A.P., S.R.-A., E.S.-G. and F.J.J.-N.; software, validation, and formal analysis, M.D.I.-I. and A.P; investigation, I.S. and A.F.M.-R.; resources, F.N.-R., S.R.-A. and A.F.M.-R.; Data-curation, F.N.-R. and S.R.-A.; Writing—original draft preparation: I.S.; Writing—review and editing, F.N.-R.; visualization, F.N.-R.; supervision, F.N.-R. and A.F.M.-R.; project administration and funding acquisition, F.N.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Spain’s Ministry of Education, Science and Sport, FPU Grant (Ref. FPU14/06556) and by Spain’s Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, predoctoral grant (Ref. BES-2012-059366).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the institution and staff of the Odiel Marshes Natural Park. Infante-Izquierdo wishes to thank Spain’s Ministry of Education, Science and Sport for awarding the FPU Grant (Ref. FPU14/06556). Martínez-Sagarra wishes to thank Spain’s Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for the award of a predoctoral grant (Ref. BES-2012-059366).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Williams, T.P.; Bubb, J.M.; Lester, J.N. Metal accumulation within salt marsh environments: A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1994, 28, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Williams, T.P.; Bubb, J.M.; Lester, J.N. The occurrence and distribution of trace metals in halophytes. Chemosphere 1994, 28, 1189–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Seneviratne, M.; Rajakaruna, N.; Rizwan, N.; Madawala, H.M.S.P.; Ok, Y.S.; Vithanage, M. Heavy metal-induced oxidative stress on seed germination and seedling development: A critical review. Environ. Geochem. Health 2019, 41, 1813–1831. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu, G.; Kang, H.; Zhang, X.; Shao, H.; Chu, L.; Ruan, C. A critical review on the bio-removal of hazardous heavy metals from contaminated soils: Issues progress eco-environmental concerns and opportunities. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 174, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Moreira, H.; Marques AP, G.C.; Rangel AO, S.S.; Castro, P.M.L. Heavy metal accumulation in plant species indigenous to a contaminated Portuguese site: Prospects for phytoremediation. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 221, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Vithanage, M.; Dabrowska, B.B.; Mukherjee, B.; Sandhi, A.; Bhattacharya, P. Arsenic uptake by plants and possible phytoremediation applications: A brief overview. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2012, 10, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Sajad, M.A. Phytoremediation of heavy metals-concepts and applications. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mahar, A.; Wang, P.; Ali, A.; Awasthi, M.K.; Lahori, A.H.; Wang, Q.; Li, R.; Zhang, Z. Challenges and opportunities in the phytoremediation of heavy metals contaminated soils: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 126, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lu, Y.; Li, X.; He, M.; Zeng, F.; Li, X. Accumulation of heavy metals in native plants growing on mininginfluenced sites in Jinchang: A typical industrial city (China). Environ. Earth Sci. 2017, 76, 446–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nouri, H.; Borujeni, S.C.; Nirola, R.; Hassanli, A.; Beecham, S.; Alaghmand, S.; Saint, C.; Mulcahy, D. Application of green remediation on soil salinity treatment: A review on halophytoremediation. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2017, 107, 94–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oyuela-Leguizamo, M.A.; Fernández-Gómez, W.D.; Gutiérrez-Sarmiento, M.C. Native herbaceous plant species with potential use in phytoremediation of heavy metals spotlight on wetlands—A review. Chemosphere 2017, 168, 1230–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Weis, J.; Weis, P. Metal uptake transport and release by wetland plants: Implications for phytoremediation and restoration. Environ. Int. 2004, 30, 685–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kavamura, V.N.; Esposito, E. Biotechnological strategies applied to the decontamination of soils polluted with heavy metals. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bankaji, I.; Sleimi, N.; López-Climent, M.F.; Pérez-Clemente, R.M.; Gómez-Cadenas, A. Effects of combined abiotic stresses on growth trace element accumulation and phytohormone regulation in two halophytic species. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 33, 632–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Anjum, N.A.; Pereira, M.E.; Ahmad, I.; Duarte, A.C.; Umar, S.; Khan, N.A. Phytotechnologies: Remediation of Environmental Contaminants; CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  16. Anjum, N.A.; Ahmad, I.; Válega, M.; Mohmood, I.; Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N.; Duarte, A.C.; Pereira, E. Salt marsh halophyte services to metal-metalloid remediation: Assessment of the processes and underlying mechanisms. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Technol. 2014, 44, 2038–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jayasri, M.A.; Suthindhiran, K. Effect of zinc and lead on the physiological and biochemical properties of aquatic plant Lemna minor: Its potential role in phytoremediation. Appl. Water Sci. 2017, 7, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lefèvre, I.; Marchal, G.; Corrèal, E.; Zanuzzi, A.; Lutts, S. Variation in response to heavy metals during vegetative growth in Dorycnium pentaphyllum Scop. Plant Growth Regul. 2009, 59, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bae, J.; Benoit, D.L.; Watson, A.K. Effect of heavy metals on seed germination and seedling growth of common ragweed and roadside ground cover legumes. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 213, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Moosavi, S.E.; Gharineh, M.H.; Afshari, R.T.; Ebrahimi, A. Effects of some heavy metals on seed germination characteristics of canola (Brassica napus) wheat (Triticum aestivum) and safflower (Carthamus tinctorious) to evaluate phytoremediation potential of these crops. J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 4, 11. [Google Scholar]
  21. Márquez-García, B.; Márquez, C.; Sanjosé, I.; Nieva FJ, J.; Rodríguez-Rubio, P.; Muñoz-Rodríguez, A.F. The effects of heavy metals on germination and seedling characteristics in two halophyte species in Mediterranean marshes. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 70, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Peralta, J.R.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; Tiemann, K.J.; Gomez, E.; Arteaga, S.; Rascon, E.; Parsons, J.G. Uptake and effects of five heavy metals on seed germination and plant growth in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2001, 66, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, D.; Nath, K.; Sharma, Y.K. Response of wheat seed germination and seedling growth under copper stress. J. Environ. Biol. 2007, 28, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Adrees, M.; Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Ibrahim, M.; Abbas, F.; Farid, M.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Irshad, M.K.; Bharwana, S.A. The effect of excess copper on growth and physiology of important food crops: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 8148–8162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kranner, I.; Colville, L. Metals and seeds: Biochemical and molecular implications and their significance for seed germination. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 72, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ko, K.S.; Lee, P.K.; Kong, I.C. Evaluation of the toxic effects of arsenite chromate cadmium and copper using a battery of four bioassays. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 95, 1343–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liang, L.; Liu, W.; Sun, Y.; Huo, X.; Li, S.; Zhou, Q. Phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated saline soils using halophytes: Current progress and future perspectives. Environ. Rev. 2017, 25, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Fourati, E.; Wali, M.; Vogel-Mikuš, K.; Abdelly, C.; Ghnaya, T. Nickel tolerance accumulation and subcellular distribution in the halophytes Sesuvium portulacastrum and Cakile maritima. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 108, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Milić, D.; Luković, J.; Ninkov, J.; Zeremski-Škorić, T.; Zorić, L.; Vasin, J.; Milić, S. Heavy metal content in halophytic plants from inland and maritime saline areas. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2012, 7, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wali, M.; Fourati, E.; Hmaeid, N.; Ghabriche, R.; Poschenrieder, C.; Abdelly, C.; Ghnaya, T. NaCl alleviates Cd toxicity by changing its chemical forms of accumulation in the halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 10769–10777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ouni, Y.; Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Abdelly, C.; Lakhdar, A. Interactive effect of salinity and zinc stress on growth and photosynthetic responses of the perennial grass Polypogon monspeliensis. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 95, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sousa, A.I.; Caçador, I.; Lillebø, A.I.; Pardal, M.A. Heavy metal accumulation in Halimione portulacoides: Intra- and extra-cellular metal binding sites. Chemosphere 2008, 70, 850–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Lutts, S.; Lefèvre, I. How can we take advantage of halophyte properties to cope with heavy metal toxicity in salt-affected areas? Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 509–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Aronson, J. Salt Tolerant Plant of the World; University of Arizona Press: Tucson, AZ, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fernández-Illescas, F.; Nieva FJ, J.; Silva, I.; Tormo, R.; Muñoz-Rodríguez, A.F. Pollen production of Chenopodiaceae species at habitat and landscape scale in Mediterranean salt marshes: An ecological and phenological study. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 2010, 161, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Contreras-Cruzado, I.; Infante-Izquierdo, M.D.; Márquez-García, B.; Hermoso-López, V.; Polo, A.; Nieva, F.J.; Cartes-Barroso, J.B.; Castillo, J.M.; Muñoz-Rodríguez, A.F. Relationships between spatio-temporal changes in the sedimentary environment and halophytes zonation in salt marshes. Geoderma 2017, 305, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Castro, R.; Pereira, S.; Lima, A.; Corticeiro, S.; Valega, M.; Pereira, E.; Duarte, A.; Figueira, E. Accumulation distribution and cellular partitioning of mercury in several halophytes of a contaminated salt marsh. Chemosphere 2006, 76, 1348–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Reboreda, R.; Caçador, I. Halophyte vegetation influences in salt marsh retention capacity for heavy metals. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 146, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Válega, M.; Lillebø, A.I.; Pereira, M.E.; Caçador, I.; Duarte, A.C.; Pardal, M.A. Mercury in salt marshes ecosystems: Halimione portulacoides as biomonitor. Chemosphere 2008, 73, 1224–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Duarte, B.; Caetano, M.; Almeida, P.; Vale, C.; Caçador, I. Accumulation and biological cycling of heavy metal in four salt marsh species from Tagus estuary (Portugal). Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158, 1661–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Anjum, N.A.; Ahmad, I.; Válega, M.; Pacheco, M.; Figueira, E.; Duarte, A.C.; Pereira, E. Impact of seasonal fluctuations on the sediment-mercury its accumulation and partitioning in Halimione portulacoides and Juncus maritimus collected from Ria de Aveiro Coastal Lagoon (Portugal). Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 22, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sleimi, N.; Bankaji, I.; Dallai, M.; Kefi, O. Accumulation des éléments traces et tolérance au stress métallique chez les halophytes colonisant les bordures de la lagune de Bizerte (Tunisie). Rev. D’ecologie 2014, 69, 49–59. [Google Scholar]
  43. Almeida, C.M.R.; Diasa, A.C.; Mucha, A.P.; Bordaloa, A.A.; Vasconcelos, M.T.S.D. Study of the influence of different organic pollutants on Cu accumulation by Halimione portulacoides. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2009, 85, 627–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Caetano, M.; Vale, C.; Cesario, R.; Fonseca, N. Evidence for preferential depths of metal retention in roots of salt marsh plants. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 390, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Santos-Echeandía, J.; Vale, C.; Caetano, M.; Pereira, P.; Prego, R. Effect of tidal flooding on metal distribution in pore waters of marsh sediments and its transport to water column (Tagus estuary Portugal). Mar. Environ. Res. 2010, 70, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. González-Alcaraz, M.N.; Conesa, H.M.; Del Carmen Tercero, M.; Schulin, R.; Álvarez-Rogel, J.; Egea, C. The combined use of liming and Sarcocornia fruticosa development for phytomanagement of salt marsh soils polluted by mine wastes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lutts, S.; Lefèvre, I.; Delpérée, C.; Kivits, S.; Dechamps, C.; Robledo, A.; Correal, E. Heavy metal accumulation by the halophyte species Mediterranean saltbush. J. Environ. Qual. 2004, 33, 1271–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abbad, A.; El Hadrami, A.; Benchaabane, A. Germination responses of the Mediterranean saltbush (Atriplex halimus L.) to NaCl treatment. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2004, 3, 111–114. [Google Scholar]
  49. Manousaki, E.; Kalogerakis, N. Phytoextraction of Pb and Cd by the Mediterranean saltbush (Atriplex halimus L.): Metal uptake in relation to salinity. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2009, 16, 844–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Andrades-Moreno, L.; Cambrollé, J.; Perez-Martin, A. Assessing the effect of copper on growth copper accumulation and physiological responses of grazing species Atriplex halimus: Ecotoxicological implications. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 90, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Nedjimi, B.; Daoud, Y. Cadmium accumulation in Atriplex halimus subsp. schweinfurthii and its influence on growth proline root hydraulic conductivity and nutrient uptake. Flora 2009, 204, 316–324. [Google Scholar]
  52. Redondo-Gómez, S.; Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Andrades-Moreno, L. Accumulation and tolerance characteristics of cadmium in a halophytic Cd-hyperaccumulator Arthrocnemum macrostachyum. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 184, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kachout, S.S.; Ben Mansoura, A.; Mechergui, R.; Leclerc, J.C.; Rejeb, M.N.; Ouerghi, Z. Accumulation of Cu Pb Ni and Zn in the halophyte plant Atriplex grown on polluted soil. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Eissa, M.A. Impact of compost on metals phytostabilization potential of two halophytes species. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2015, 17, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vromman, D.; Flores-Bavestrello, A.; Šlejkovec, Z.; Lapaille, S.; Teixeira-Cardoso, C.; Briceño, M.; Kumar, M.; Martínez, J.-P.; Lutts, S. Arsenic accumulation and distribution in relation to young seedling growth in Atriplex atacamensis. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 412, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Midhat, L.; Ouazzani, N.; Esshaimi, M.; Ouhammou, A.; Mandi, L. Assessment of heavy metals accumulation by spontaneous vegetation: Screening for new accumulator plant species grown in Kettara mine-Marrakech Southern Morocco. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2017, 19, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Pedro, C.A.; Santos, M.S.; Ferreira, S.M.; Gonçalves, S.C. The influence of cadmium contamination and salinity on the survival growth and phytoremediation capacity of the saltmarsh plant Salicornia ramosissima. Mar. Environ. Res. 2013, 92, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bankaji, I.; Caçador, I.; Sleimi, N. Physiological and biochemical responses of Suaeda fruticosa to cadmium and copper stresses: Growth nutrient uptake antioxidant enzymes phytochelatin and glutathione levels. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 13058–13069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, C.; Zuo, J.; Liu, L.; Qin, S.; Yu, J.; Liu, J. Petroleum pollution and its ecological impact on Salsola glauca Bunge in the Yellow River Delta Nature Reserve China. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2011, 20, 904–1909. [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhang, X.; Lia, M.; Yang, H.; Lia, X.; Cui, Z. Physiological responses of Suaeda glauca and Arabidopsis thaliana inphytoremediation of heavy metals. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 223, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Panda, A.; Rangani, J.; Kumari, A.; Parida, A.K. Efficient regulation of Arsenic translocation to shoot tissue and modulation of phytochelatin levels and antioxidative defense system confers salinity and arsenic tolerance in the halophyte Suaeda maritima. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 143, 149–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, H.; Liu, X.; Zhao, J.; Yu, J. Regulation of metabolites gene expression and antioxidant enzymes to environmentally relevant lead and zinc in the halophyte Suaeda salsa. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 32, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shrestha, B.; Lipe, S.; Johnson, K.A.; Zhang, T.Q.; Retzlaff, W.; Lin, Z.Q. Soil hydraulic manipulation and organic amendment for the enhancement of selenium volatilization in a soil-pickleweed system. Plant Soil 2006, 288, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Creager, R.A. The biology of mediterranean saltwort Salsola vermiculata. Weed Technol. 1988, 2, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Muñoz-Rodríguez, A.F.; Sanjosé, I.; Márquez-García, B.; Infante-Izquierdo, M.D.; Polo-Ávila, A.; Nieva, F.J.; Castillo, J.M. Germination syndromes in response to salinity of Chenopodiaceae halophytes along the intertidal gradient. Aquat. Bot. 2017, 139, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fernández-Illescas, F.; Cabrera, J.; Nieva FJ, J.; Márquez-García, B.; Sánchez-Gullón, E.; Muñoz-Rodríguez, A.F. Production of aborted pollen in marsh species of Chenopodiaceae: Evidence of partial male sterility in Suadeaea and Salsoleae species. Plant Syst. Evol. 2010, 288, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nelson, C.H.; Lamothe, P.J. Heavy metal anomalies in the Tinto and Odiel River and estuary system Spain. Estuaries 1993, 16, 496–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sainz, A.; Grande, J.A.; de la Torre, M.L. Characterization of heavy metal discharge into the Ria of Huelva. Environ. Int. 2004, 30, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pérez-López, R.; Nieto, J.M.; López-Cascajosa, M.J.; Díaz-Blanco, M.J.; Sarmiento, A.M.; Oliveira, V.; Sánchez-Rodas, D. Evaluation of heavy metals and arsenic speciation discharged by the industrial activity on the Tinto–Odiel estuary SW Spain. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Boularbah, A.; Schwartz, C.; Bitton, G.; Morel, J.L. Heavy metals contamination from mining sites in South Morocco: 2. Assessment of metal accumulation and toxicity in plants. Chemosphere 2006, 63, 811–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Muñoz-Rodríguez, A.F.; Rodríguez-Rubio, P.; Nieva FJ, J.; Fernández-Illescas, F.; Sánchez-Gullón, E.; Soto, J.M.; Hermoso-López, V.; Márquez-García, B. The importance of bracteoles in ensuring Atriplex halimus germination under optimal conditions. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2012, 21, 3521–3526. [Google Scholar]
  72. Bae, J.; Mercier, G.; Watson, A.K.; Benoit, D.L. Seed germination test for heavy metal phytotoxicity assessment. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 94, 1519–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Barba-Brioso, C.; Fernández-Caliani, J.C.; Miras, A.; Cornejo, J.; Galán, E. Multisource water pollution in a highly anthropized wetland system associated with the estuary of Huelva (SW Spain). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2010, 60, 1259–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Infante-Izquierdo, M.D.; Hernandez, P.; Polo, A.; Marquez-Garcia, B.; Nieva FJ, J.; Davila, C.; Molina, C.; Muñoz-Rodriguez, A.F. Effects of light salt and burial depth on the germination and initial seedling development of Oenothera drummondii. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2017, 26, 5502–5510. [Google Scholar]
  75. Wilkins, D.A. The measurement of tolerance to edaphic factors by means of root growth. New Phytol. 1978, 80, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lei, Y.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Physiological and biochemical responses to high Mn concentrations in two contrasting Populus cathayana populations. Chemosphere 2007, 68, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Al Harbawee, W.E.Q.; Kluchagina, A.N.; Anjum, N.A.; Bashmakov, D.I.; Lukatkin, A.S.; Pereira, E. Evaluation of cotton burdock (Arctium tomentosum Mill.) responses to multi-metal exposure. Environ. Sci Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 5431–5438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Marschner, H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  79. Kabata-Pendias, A.; Pendias, H. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  80. Luque, C.J.; Castellanos, E.M.; Castillo, J.M.; González, M.; González-Vilches, M.C.; Figueroa, M.E. Metals in halophytes of a contaminated Estuary (Odiel saltmarshes SW Spain). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1999, 38, 49–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Stenner, R.D.; Nikless, G. Heavy metals in organisms of the Atlantic coast of Southwestern Spain and Portugal. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1975, 6, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Feng, J.; Lin, Y.; Yang, Y.; Shen, Q.; Huang, J.; Wang, S.; Zhu, X.; Li, Z. Tolerance and bioaccumulation of Cd and Cu in Sesuvium portulacastrum. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 147, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Oh, S.-J.; Koh, S.-C. Copper and zinc uptake capacity of a Sorghum-sudangrass hybrid selected for in situ phytoremediation of soils polluted by heavy metals. J. Environ. Sci. Int. 2015, 24, 1501–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Clarkson, D.T. The uptake and translocation of manganese by plant roots. In Manganese in Soil and Plants; Graham, R.D., Hannam, R.J., Uren, N.J., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988; pp. 101–111. [Google Scholar]
  85. Foy, C.D.; Chaney, R.L.; White, M.C. The physiology of metal toxicity in plants. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1978, 29, 511. [Google Scholar]
  86. Horst, W.J.; Marschner, H. Effect of silicon on manganese tolerance of bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Soil 1978, 50, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lidon, F.C.; Teixeira, M.G. Rice tolerance to excess Mn: Implications in the chloroplast lamellae and synthesis of a novel Mn protein. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2000, 38, 969–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ahmad, M.S.A.; Ashraf, M. Essential roles and hazardous effects of nickel in plants. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2011, 214, 125–167. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  89. Fabiano, C.C.; Tezotto, T.; Favarin, J.L.; Polacco, J.C.; Mazzafera, P. Essentiality of nickel in plants: A role in plant stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Ain, Q.; Akhtar, J.; Amjad, M.; Haq, M.A.; Saqib, Z.A. Effect of Enhanced Nickel Levels on Wheat Plant Growth and Physiology under Salt Stress. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2016, 47, 2538–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chen, C.; Huang, D.; Liu, J. Functions and Toxicity of Nickel in Plants: Recent Advances and Future Prospects. J. Clean. Prod. 2009, 37, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Parlak, K.U. Effect of nickel on growth and biochemical characteristics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. NJAS—Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2016, 76, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gupta, V.; Jatav, P.K.; Verma, R.; Kothari, S.L.; Kachhwaha, S. Nickel accumulation and its effect on growth physiological and biochemical parameters in millets and oats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 23915–23925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Seregin, I.; Kozhevnikova, A. Physiological role of nickel and its toxic effects on higher plants. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 53, 257–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nedhi, A.; Singh, L.J.; Singh, S.I. Effect of cadmium and nickel on germination early seedling growth and photosynthesis of wheat and pigeon pea. Int. J. Trop. Agric. 1990, 8, 141–147. [Google Scholar]
  96. Thakur, S.; Sharma, S.S. Characterization of seed germination seedling growth and associated metabolic responses of Brassica juncea L. cultivars to elevated nickel concentrations. Protoplasma 2016, 253, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. White, P.J.; Brown, P.H. Plant nutrition for sustainable development and global health. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Yusuf, M.; Fariduddin, Q.; Hayat, S.; Ahmad, A. Nickel: An Overview of Uptake Essentiality and Toxicity in Plants. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2011, 86, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kozhevnikova, A.D.; Erlikh, N.T.; Zhukovskaya, N.V.; Obroucheva, N.V.; Ivanov, V.B.; Belinskaya, A.A.; Khutoryanskaya, M.Y.; Seregin, I.V. Nickel and zinc effects accumulation and distribution in ruderal plants Lepidium ruderale and Capsella bursa-pastoris. Acta Physiol. Plant 2014, 36, 3291–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mohseni, R.; Ghaderian, S.M.; Ghasemi, R.; Schat, H. Differential effects of iron starvation and iron excess on nickel uptake kinetics in two Iranian nickel hyperaccumulators Odontarrhena bracteata and Odontarrhena inflata. Plant Soil 2018, 428, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pandey, S.N. Accumulation of heavy metals (Cd Cr Cu Ni and Zn) in Raphanus sativus L. and Spinacia oleracea L. plants irrigated with industrial effluent. J. Environ. Biol. 2006, 27, 381–384. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  102. Ivanov, Y.V.; Kartashov, A.V.; Ivanova, A.I.; Savochkin, Y.V.; Kuznetsov, V.V. Effects of zinc on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings grown in hydroculture. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 102, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Homer, F.A.; Morrison, R.S.; Brooks, R.R.; Clemens, J.; Reeves, R.D. Comparative studies of nickel cobalt and copper uptake by some nickel hyperaccumulators of the genus Alyssum. Plant Soil 1991, 138, 195–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Baker, A.J.M. Accumulators and excluders: Strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals. J. Plant Nutr. 1981, 3, 643–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effects of Cu (A), Mn (B), Ni (C), and Zn (D) on the initial development of the cotyledon, hypocotyl, and radicle of Salsola vermiculata seedlings. Figure 1 shows the mean and standard deviation. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05): lowercase Latin letters for cotyledons, uppercase Latin letters for hypocotyles, and Greek letters for radicles.
Figure 1. Effects of Cu (A), Mn (B), Ni (C), and Zn (D) on the initial development of the cotyledon, hypocotyl, and radicle of Salsola vermiculata seedlings. Figure 1 shows the mean and standard deviation. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05): lowercase Latin letters for cotyledons, uppercase Latin letters for hypocotyles, and Greek letters for radicles.
Diversity 13 00539 g001
Figure 2. Levels of Cu (A), Mn (B), Ni, (C) and Zn (D) (mg kg−1 or ppm) accumulated in the seedlings germinated at different concentrations of metals, and quadratic equations for curves with their determination coefficient (R2) and p value.
Figure 2. Levels of Cu (A), Mn (B), Ni, (C) and Zn (D) (mg kg−1 or ppm) accumulated in the seedlings germinated at different concentrations of metals, and quadratic equations for curves with their determination coefficient (R2) and p value.
Diversity 13 00539 g002
Table 1. Germination percentage after 30 days, t50 and tolerance index for cotyledons, hypocotyls, and radicles.
Table 1. Germination percentage after 30 days, t50 and tolerance index for cotyledons, hypocotyls, and radicles.
Concentration (μM)Germination (%)t50 (Days)IT CotyledonIT HypocotylIT Roots
Cu (μM)
094.65 ± 0.04 a1.43 ± 0.12 a100100100
1094.66 ± 0.04 ab1.35 ± 0.14 a102104113
2592.00 ± 0.08 ab1.53 ± 0.14 a949197
5096.00 ± 0.04 ab1.47 ± 0.1 a939491
10092.00 ± 0.06 ab1.28 ± 0.24 a101100113
25093.33 ± 0.04 ab1.30 ± 0.19 a979671 *
100098.66 ± 0.02 a1.30 ± 0.05 a958838 *
200093.33 ± 0.08 a1.43 ± 0.16 a958036 *
400080.00 ± 0.06 b1.35 ± 0.10 a7346 *28 *
Mn (μM)
094.65 ± 0.04 a1.43 ± 0.12 a100100100
1093.33 ± 0.02 a1.33 ± 0.37 a929688
2591.83 ± 0.04 a1.44 ± 0.10 a104112104
5094.66 ± 0.02 a1.35 ± 0.12 a98107105
10089.33 ± 0.06 a1.36 ± 0.23 a10610293
25096.00 ± 0.04 a1.55 ± 0.03 a9692113
100089.11 ± 0.09 a1.40 ± 0.09 a103106113
200098.66 ± 0.02 a1.40 ± 0.24 a104104133
400090.50 ± 0.04 a1.33 ± 0.18 a95100116
Ni (μM)
094.65 ± 0.04 a1.43 ± 0.12 a100100100
1097.33 ± 0.02 a1.38 ± 0.08 a99103103
2598.66 ± 0.02 a1.41 ± 0.10 a104113108
5094.66 ± 0.06 a1.30 ± 0.22 a9610097
100100.00 ± 0.00 a1.31 ± 0.17 a949683
25089.22 ± 0.04 a1.36 ± 0.06 a1009498
100094.55 ± 0.06 a1.34 ± 0.08 a1119678
200094.55 ± 0.02 a1.53 ± 0.09 a9570 *69 *
400090.66 ± 0.02 a1.31 ± 0.23 a85 *74 *31 *
Zn (μM)
094.65 ± 0.04 a1.43 ± 0.12 a100100100
1093.33 ± 0.02 ab1.31 ± 0.16 a96103101
2597.33 ± 0.02 a1.66 ± 0.32 ab99104102
5098.61 ± 0.02 a1.48 ± 0.14 ab101103130 *
10092.00 ± 0 ab1.67 ± 0.16 ab10210795
25096.00 ± 0.04 a1.61 ± 0.12 ab9695102
100096.00 ± 0.04 a1.56 ± 0.06 ab99110107
200094.66 ± 0.06 a1.59 ± 0.04 ab9910681
400079.83 ± 0.1 b1.77 ± 0.08 b9610049 *
The data show the mean ± standard deviation for 3 independent plates, with 25 seeds in each one. For each metal, different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05); IT data marked with * means significant differences with the control.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanjosé, I.; Navarro-Roldán, F.; Infante-Izquierdo, M.D.; Martínez-Sagarra, G.; Devesa, J.A.; Polo, A.; Ramírez-Acosta, S.; Sánchez-Gullón, E.; Jiménez-Nieva, F.J.; Muñoz-Rodríguez, A.F. Accumulation and Effect of Heavy Metals on the Germination and Growth of Salsola vermiculata L. Seedlings. Diversity 2021, 13, 539. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13110539

AMA Style

Sanjosé I, Navarro-Roldán F, Infante-Izquierdo MD, Martínez-Sagarra G, Devesa JA, Polo A, Ramírez-Acosta S, Sánchez-Gullón E, Jiménez-Nieva FJ, Muñoz-Rodríguez AF. Accumulation and Effect of Heavy Metals on the Germination and Growth of Salsola vermiculata L. Seedlings. Diversity. 2021; 13(11):539. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13110539

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sanjosé, Israel, Francisco Navarro-Roldán, María Dolores Infante-Izquierdo, Gloria Martínez-Sagarra, Juan Antonio Devesa, Alejandro Polo, Sara Ramírez-Acosta, Enrique Sánchez-Gullón, Francisco Javier Jiménez-Nieva, and Adolfo Francisco Muñoz-Rodríguez. 2021. "Accumulation and Effect of Heavy Metals on the Germination and Growth of Salsola vermiculata L. Seedlings" Diversity 13, no. 11: 539. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13110539

APA Style

Sanjosé, I., Navarro-Roldán, F., Infante-Izquierdo, M. D., Martínez-Sagarra, G., Devesa, J. A., Polo, A., Ramírez-Acosta, S., Sánchez-Gullón, E., Jiménez-Nieva, F. J., & Muñoz-Rodríguez, A. F. (2021). Accumulation and Effect of Heavy Metals on the Germination and Growth of Salsola vermiculata L. Seedlings. Diversity, 13(11), 539. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13110539

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop