Next Article in Journal
Shifts in Community Vegetative Organs and Their Dissimilar Trade-Off Patterns in a Tropical Coastal Secondary Forest, Hainan Island, Southern China
Next Article in Special Issue
Active Sampling and Understory Traps Can Cost-Effectively Detect Changes in Butterfly Communities after Hydroelectric Dam Construction
Previous Article in Journal
Seasonal Habitat Selection by American White Pelicans
Previous Article in Special Issue
Good Things Come in Larger Packages: Size Matters for Adult Fruit-Feeding Butterfly Dispersal and Larval Diet Breadth
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Global Biodiversity of the Family Lecithoceridae (Gelechioidea) with a Brief Historical Review

Diversity 2022, 14(10), 822; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14100822
by Kyu-Tek Park
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diversity 2022, 14(10), 822; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14100822
Submission received: 23 August 2022 / Revised: 19 September 2022 / Accepted: 22 September 2022 / Published: 30 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Diversity of Lepidopteras)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The present manuscript submitted for publication in "Diversity" contains a brief overview of the composition, morphology, biology and distribution of the moths of the family Lecithoceridae. In terms of subject and content, the manuscript is quite suitable for publication in “Diversity”, however I have some remarks on the content of the manuscript and on its design, which I hope help to improve it.  All the remarks and suggestions are in the file attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please find attached. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Author:

I liked very much this interesting review of Lecithoceridae.

This review is extremely detailed and represents a very important information source for any lepidopterist interested in the systematics of this micromoth family.

I included some minor observations in the manuscript file to you consider.

Congratulations for this fine work!!

Best regards,

Héctor

 

  

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please find attached. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Author,

Thank you for the opportunity to read your interesting study.

I have two small comments:

1. please check the font size in lines 207-210, 244-250, and 269. In my opinion, the font size here is larger than in the rest of the text.

2. possibly, better to use a special section “Funding” as it is recommended by journal, but not to include the funding information in Acknowledgments.

Back to TopTop