Next Article in Journal
Single-Island Endemism despite Repeated Dispersal in Caribbean Micrathena (Araneae: Araneidae): An Updated Phylogeographic Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Integrated Studies of Banana on Remote Sensing, Biogeography, and Biodiversity: An Indonesian Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Seahorse Predation by Octopuses in the Caribbean and the West Pacific
Previous Article in Special Issue
Understanding the Long-Term Impact of Bamboos on Secondary Forests: A Case for Bamboo Management in Southern Brazil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Return to Agrobiodiversity: Participatory Plant Breeding

by
Salvatore Ceccarelli
* and
Stefania Grando
Independent Consultants, Corso Mazzini 256, 63100 Ascoli Piceno, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2022, 14(2), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14020126
Submission received: 24 January 2022 / Revised: 1 February 2022 / Accepted: 4 February 2022 / Published: 10 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Plant Diversity)

Abstract

Biodiversity in general, and agrobiodiversity in particular are crucial for adaptation to climate change, for resilience and for human health as related to dietary diversity. Participatory plant breeding (PPB) has been promoted for its advantages to increase selection efficiency, variety adoption and farmers’ empowerment, and for being more socially equitable and gender responsive than conventional plant breeding. In this review paper we concentrate on one specific benefit of PPB, namely, increasing agrobiodiversity by describing how the combination of decentralized selection with the collaboration of farmers is able to address the diversity of agronomic environments, which is likely to increase because of the location specificity of climate change. Therefore, while PPB has been particularly suited to organic agriculture, in light of the increasing importance of climate change, it should also be considered as a breeding opportunity for conventional agriculture.
Keywords: biodiversity; participation; decentralization; climate change; human health; climate change; genotype x environment interaction; breeding efficiency biodiversity; participation; decentralization; climate change; human health; climate change; genotype x environment interaction; breeding efficiency

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ceccarelli, S.; Grando, S. Return to Agrobiodiversity: Participatory Plant Breeding. Diversity 2022, 14, 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14020126

AMA Style

Ceccarelli S, Grando S. Return to Agrobiodiversity: Participatory Plant Breeding. Diversity. 2022; 14(2):126. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14020126

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ceccarelli, Salvatore, and Stefania Grando. 2022. "Return to Agrobiodiversity: Participatory Plant Breeding" Diversity 14, no. 2: 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14020126

APA Style

Ceccarelli, S., & Grando, S. (2022). Return to Agrobiodiversity: Participatory Plant Breeding. Diversity, 14(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14020126

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop