Next Article in Journal
Species Composition of Aquatic (Nepomorpha) and Semiaquatic (Gerromorpha) Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera) in Kaeng Krachan National Park, Phetchaburi Province, Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
Opportunities to Improve Eco-Agriculture through Transboundary Governance in Transfrontier Conservation Areas
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Spatial Distribution of Soil Nitrogen Storage and the Factors That Influence It in Central Asia’s Typical Arid and Semiarid Grasslands

Diversity 2022, 14(6), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14060459
by Yusen Chen 1,2,3,†, Shihang Zhang 1,2,4,†, Yongdong Wang 1,2,3,*, Talgat Abzhanov 5, Dani Sarsekova 5 and Zhazira Zhumabekova 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Diversity 2022, 14(6), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14060459
Submission received: 4 May 2022 / Revised: 3 June 2022 / Accepted: 4 June 2022 / Published: 8 June 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article is well-written, in understandable language, the results are clear and followable. However, I suggest a few improvements on the figures. On the maps the geographic names are a bit hardly readable, and on Figure 3 the texts are very small, almost invisible. Furthermore, I suggest to consider showing the data in Table 1 as figures, maybe it would be more comprehensible. Otherwise, the article is a complex, cohesive one, with important results.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer, I have drafted your response in the accompanying Microsoft Word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript entitled “The spatial distribution of soil nitrogen storage and the factors that influence it in Central Asia's typical arid and semi-arid grasslands” authored by Yusen Chen and team

Abstract: quantification is missing, add results and remove general statements.

Keywords: ok

Preface/introduction: ok

L 71-82 need improvement

Objectives of the study should be clear

Scope of the study area: Not clear, pl revised full section

Materials and methods : Overall ok

Data sources: L 110-113 need improvement

Calculation of TN density and storage capacity; OK

Analysis methods: add more details for clear understanding with relevant references.

Results: overall good, fulling suggestions need to be incorporate

Descriptive statistical analysis of soil N content and environmental variables: add value ± SD value

Table 1 SD should be with ± symbol

Table 2 Ok

Figure 1 and 2 resolution should be improved

Results - add data in results for quantification, major improvement is require

Figure 3: very poor resolution

Figure 4 and Figure 5. Excellent

Figure 6 and Figure 7 : Ok

Discussion: well written

Conclusion : quantification is missing

Author Response

Dear reviewer, I have drafted your response in the accompanying Microsoft Word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Now the author(s) has incorporated all suggestion and comments. The current version of MS may be accepted for further process.

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer:

  I note that you did not give an opinion in the second review report,I will submit the previously revised version

Best wishes

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop