The Spatial Distribution of Soil Nitrogen Storage and the Factors That Influence It in Central Asia’s Typical Arid and Semiarid Grasslands
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The article is well-written, in understandable language, the results are clear and followable. However, I suggest a few improvements on the figures. On the maps the geographic names are a bit hardly readable, and on Figure 3 the texts are very small, almost invisible. Furthermore, I suggest to consider showing the data in Table 1 as figures, maybe it would be more comprehensible. Otherwise, the article is a complex, cohesive one, with important results.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear reviewer, I have drafted your response in the accompanying Microsoft Word file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Manuscript entitled “The spatial distribution of soil nitrogen storage and the factors that influence it in Central Asia's typical arid and semi-arid grasslands” authored by Yusen Chen and team
Abstract: quantification is missing, add results and remove general statements.
Keywords: ok
Preface/introduction: ok
L 71-82 need improvement
Objectives of the study should be clear
Scope of the study area: Not clear, pl revised full section
Materials and methods : Overall ok
Data sources: L 110-113 need improvement
Calculation of TN density and storage capacity; OK
Analysis methods: add more details for clear understanding with relevant references.
Results: overall good, fulling suggestions need to be incorporate
Descriptive statistical analysis of soil N content and environmental variables: add value ± SD value
Table 1 SD should be with ± symbol
Table 2 Ok
Figure 1 and 2 resolution should be improved
Results - add data in results for quantification, major improvement is require
Figure 3: very poor resolution
Figure 4 and Figure 5. Excellent
Figure 6 and Figure 7 : Ok
Discussion: well written
Conclusion : quantification is missing
Author Response
Dear reviewer, I have drafted your response in the accompanying Microsoft Word file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Now the author(s) has incorporated all suggestion and comments. The current version of MS may be accepted for further process.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer:
I note that you did not give an opinion in the second review report,I will submit the previously revised version
Best wishes
Author Response File: Author Response.docx