Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Daphnia cucullata Sars, 1862 in Boreal Lakes (Latvian Lakeland) Based on Microsatellites
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Rainfall on the Population Densities and Community Structure of Birds in an Urbanized Zambezi Riparian Forest
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Current State of Natural Populations of Paeonia anomala (Paeoniaceae) in East Kazakhstan

by
Serik A. Kubentayev
1,2,*,
Oxana N. Khapilina
3,
Margarita Yu. Ishmuratova
4,
Aisulu K. Sarkytbayeva
5,*,
Ainur S. Turzhanova
3,
Akzhunis A. Imanbayeva
6,
Daniyar T. Alibekov
1,2 and
Moldir Z. Zhumagul
1,2,5,*
1
Astana Botanical Garden, Orunbur 16, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Graduate School of Natural Sciences, Astana International University, Kabanbai Batyr 8, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
3
National Center for Biotechnology, Qorghalzhyn Hwy 13, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
4
Department of Botany, E.A. Buketov Karaganda University, St. Universitetskaya, 28, Karaganda 100028, Kazakhstan
5
Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Biodiversity and Bioresources, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi Avenue 71, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
6
Mangyshlak Experimental Botanical Garden, Microdistrict 10/2, Aktau 130000, Kazakhstan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(11), 1127; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15111127
Submission received: 22 August 2023 / Revised: 24 October 2023 / Accepted: 25 October 2023 / Published: 31 October 2023

Abstract

:
Paeonia anomala L. is a valuable and sought-after medicinal plant for treating therapeutic pathologies. The natural habitat of P. anomala in the Republic of Kazakhstan is located in the mountainous areas of the East Kazakhstan region. P. anomala is listed in the Red Book of Kazakhstan as a rare species with limited distribution. In this regard, we studied a strategy for preserving the biological diversity of P. anomala wild population. In particular, the ecological, phytocenotic, and floristic characteristics of five P. anomala populations in East Kazakhstan were explored. The anatomical, morphological, and genetic variability of the species in various habitats was evaluated. Overall, the condition of the P. anomala population in the study region can be considered satisfactory. The floristic composition of P. anomala plant communities recorded 130 species belonging to 35 families and 101 genera. The northern slopes of mountains and shrub-grass communities with leached chernozem with high contents of N-NO3 and P2O5 appeared to be optimal for P. anomala growth. Asteraceae (13%), Rosaceae (13%), Poaceae (10%), and Ranunculaceae (9%) are the major families of P. anomala flora and plant communities. The Eurasian (54%), Asian (24%), and Holarctic (15%) groups were recognized as dominant in the chronological spectrum. Amplification with iPBS primers resulted in the generation of 505 fragments, 257 of which were polymorphic. Our research results indicate that the genetic differentiation of the Kazakhstan populations is not quite as high and may indicate their long-term existence within one large population. A separate branch is formed by the P5 population, which is located separately from other populations, confirming its genetic isolation. The analysis of genetic diversity iPBS markers suggests the existence of a large, unified P. anomala population in Kazakhstan Altai.

1. Introduction

The Paeonia L. genus is the only genus of the Paeoniaceae family, which includes 32 species of shrubs and perennial herbs distributed mainly in the northern hemisphere [1]. Kazakhstan flora [2,3] possesses two species of the genus Paeonia: P. anomala L. and P. hybrida Pall. [4]. Both represent a group of taxonomic complexes of herbaceous species of the P. anomala family, which also includes Paeonia tenuifolia L., P. intermedia C.A. Mey., P. sinjiangensis K.Y.Pan, P. altaica K.M.Dai and T.H.Ying, and P. veitchii Lynch, distributed in Siberia, Central Asia, and adjacent regions [5]. However, according to recent taxonomic revisions [1,6], only three species have been recognized as related to P. anomala: P. anomala, P. intermedia, and P. tenuifolia. The remaining species were reduced to synonyms. All species of P. anomala kinship complex are diploid [1,7,8].
Paeonia anomala is known worldwide as one of the most valuable plants because of its ornamental value and medicinal properties. It is a vital and essential drug in Eurasian countries, including Russia, Mongolia, and China. Monoterpene glycosides, flavonoids, tannins, stilbene, triterpenoids, and other compounds have been found in its roots [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. These compounds have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antipathogenic properties [13,19,20,21,22,23,24].
Peony roots contain a valuable natural compound, paeoniflorin, which has antitumor effects in various types of human cancers, including gliomas [25,26,27,28,29]. P. anomala is considered to be one of the most common medicinal herbs of Chinese traditional medicine for treating central nervous system diseases [26,30,31]. Peony roots are also used as a pain reliever for female disorders [19,32,33], stomach ailments, bleeding, exhaustion, and respiratory diseases, as well as for epilepsy and coughs [34].
P. anomala is a mesophyte with a wide distribution in the northern hemisphere, from the European part of Russia to Mongolia and China. The original ancestor of the peony is considered a small tree or shrub growing in humid and shady habitats [35]. The annual layers found in P. anomala rhizome [36] confirm a tree-type construction. The peony seed structure with an imperfect and underdeveloped embryo and multi-stored fruit, typical for relatively primitive genera and families, allows its attribution to relic components of the northern hemisphere flora [37]. In addition, the spiral arrangement and preservation of the peony ventral bundle confirm leaflet primitiveness [36].
The Katon-Karagai, Kurchum, Ulan, and Zyryanovskiy administrative districts in the East Kazakhstan region are the heart of the distribution of P. anomala in Kazakhstan [38,39,40]. The Zhambyl and Almaty regions are attributed to less extensive areas of distribution, where the most extreme points of the southwest border of the species’ spread are marked. P. anomala is listed in the Red Book of Kazakhstan as a rare species with limited distribution [41]. In the study region, P. anomala is protected in the Katon-Karagai State National Nature Park and Markakol State Reserve. As a result of the intensive harvesting of P. anomala roots and flowers, wild populations are increasingly threatened and sharply reduced. Peony seed regeneration is usually low in natural habitats because seeds are damaged by weevil larvae and have delayed seed germination and seedling formation due to weak embryo development and low activity of basic enzymes [42].
Despite relatively numerous studies on the chemical composition and medicinal properties of P. anomala, the biological features and ecological–phytocoenotic confinement of the species remain poorly understood. Bioecological studies of P. anomala populations have been conducted mainly in CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States) countries [43,44,45,46,47,48,49] in local isolated territories. Studies of the genetic diversity of peony using PCR methods are not exhaustive enough, although scientific publications of their results indicate the use of different types of markers such as AFLP, SSR, ISSR, and RAPD and allow the elucidation of the structure and genetic relationships in populations of different peony species [24,50,51]. However, these studies have been conducted mainly on populations of other species located in China or South Korea [52,53,54], whereas studies of P. anomala natural populations were limited or did not fully cover the growing regions, and the genetic diversity of Kazakhstan populations had not previously been investigated. We suggest that DNA markers based on retrotransposons may be the most effective for solving this problem because this type of marker is widely used in various animal and plant species, including those that possess unknown genomes [55,56,57,58]. We believe that biodiversity analysis will improve our understanding of the genetic diversity, structure, and genetic relationships of P. anomala wild populations in Kazakhstan, which are increasingly threatened and dramatically reduced due to the intensive harvesting of roots and flowers.
Such investigations are conducted here for the first time, thereby supporting the relevance and novelty of this research. The aim of this study was to comprehensively analyze the current state of P. anomala populations in eastern Kazakhstan and assess their genetic biodiversity as well as floristic, anatomic–morphological, and ecological–phylogenetic characteristics of habitats. The research outcomes will contribute to the development of a meaningful strategy for the preservation of the natural diversity of P. anomala wild populations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. P. anomala Ecological and Phytocenotic Confinement, Morphology, and Floristic Studies of Populations

The research was conducted from 2018 to 2022 in three geographic sectors of East Kazakhstan: South, West, and Kalba Altai, according to physical–geographical zoning [59], where the Kazakhstan Altai represents a system of ranges in the southwest and southern part of this mountainous country, extending from south to north and from west to east for almost 400 km. The study region is the administrative region of East Kazakhstan. We used generally accepted geobotanical methods and applied an ecological–physiognomic approach to study the ecological–phylogenetic features of P. anomala populations. Ecological and physiognomic types unite plant communities with dominants belonging to the same eco-biomorphic index and ecological groups [60,61].
In each population, 15 plots were established for the study, and the area of each plot was: 10 × 10 m (100 m2). A total of 75 plots were counted. GPS assisted in determining the boundaries of the communities. First, general information about the plot, such as description number, geographic location, date, coordinates, height, size, and photo number, was recorded in special forms of geobotanical description. After that, the following main sections were identified: the name of vegetation type based on dominant species; the floristic composition of the community with the assessment of species abundance on the Brown–Blanke abundance scale; and the morphological features of 20 replications.
The life cycles of peonies were studied according to the method of A.A. Uranov [62]. The ecological and biological features of the species were examined according to the methodological recommendations developed by V.N. Golubev and E.F. Molchanov [63]. The distribution of the floristic composition of P. anomala communities by ecological groups and species range was performed according to Kuminova’s classification [64]. Plant names were given according to Plants of the World Online [65]. A total of 83 herbarium samples (NUR 005250—NUR 005333) were deposited in the herbarium of the Astana Botanical Garden (NUR).
The statistical analysis of morphometric parameters was performed using the program Statistica 10 (StatSoft STATISTICA 10, 2011).
Experimental and field studies of P. anomala populations, including the collection of plant material, were conducted in accordance with national and international directives and in strict compliance with the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
The identification of plant species was carried out by S.A. Kubentayev, and herbarium material was deposited in the herbarium fund of the Astana Botanical Garden (NUR).
The datasets analyzed in the present study are available from the author A.K. Sarkytbayeva upon request.

2.2. Variability in the Anatomical Structure of P. anomala Aboveground Organs

To study the anatomical structure of P. anomala, the aboveground parts of the peony were collected during the fruiting phase from each population. Leaves and stems were fixed in a mixture of glycerol, 96% alcohol, and distilled water in a 1:1:1 ratio (Strauss–Fleming mixture). Transverse sections of the leaf, petiole, and stem were prepared manually. For stem sections, microsections were obtained from the middle part of generative shoots; for leaf sections, microsections were obtained from the central part of the terminal leaf fragment; and for petiole sections, microsections were obtained from the middle part. Glycerol was used to enhance the clarity of the sections. The prepared samples were photographed using an Altami microscope with a 3.1 Mpix digital camera at 16 × 4 and 16 × 10 magnifications. The processing of photographs and measurements of the micropreparations was performed using the Altami Studio program via Paint 10.0. To describe the anatomical structure, we used the principles outlined in the works of L.I. Lotova [66], G. Prenner, and P.J. Rudall [67]. A minimum of 10 micropreparations were created for each specimen.

2.3. Genetic Diversity of P. anomala Population

To analyze the genetic diversity of natural populations of P. anomala, we used the iPBS method. Plant specimens of the same age were randomly selected within the population, growing at a distance of more than 10 m from each other to ensure the reliability of the data obtained and ensuring minimal damage to living plants. For DNA extraction, each sample comprised an equivalent amount of fresh tissue originating from 1 of 10 randomly selected plants within a specific population. Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh plant leaves using modified acidic CTAB (cetrimoniumbromid) extraction buffer (2% CTAB, 2 M NaCl, 10 mM Na3EDTA, 100 mM HEPES, pH 5.3) with RNase A treatment [68].
The extracted DNA was dissolved in 100 μL of 1 × TE buffer (1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). DNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically using a NanoDrop1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific).
The visualization of extracted DNA was performed on 1% agarose gel using the PharosFXPlus (Bio-RadLaboratories Inc., USA). DNA samples were prepared in two variants: uterine solution for long-term storage at −20 °C and working solutions for PCR at a concentration of 10 ng/μL.
The genetic diversity of the P. anomala populations was estimated using the inter-primer binding site (iPBS) retrotransposon markers (Table 1) [55].
The PCR reaction was conducted in 20 μL of reaction mixture, which included 3 μL of DNA (10 ng/μL), 4 μL Phire Reaction Buffer 5x with MgCl2, 1 μL of primer (10 mM), 0.4 μL of dNTPs mixture (10 mM), and 0.2 μL of 1 U Phire Hot Start polymerase. The amplification protocol was as follows: pre-denaturation at 98 °C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of 98 °C for 30 s, 50–57 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min and additional elongation at 72 °C for 2 min. Amplification was performed in a SimpliAmp™ amplifier (Applied-Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Singapore). Each DNA sample underwent at least two repetitions of PCR. The resulting PCR products were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel with ethidium bromide. The sizes of the amplified DNA fragments were determined through comparison with a marker (Thermo Scientific GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix 100–10,000 bp). Fragment lengths were determined using the Quantity One program in the PharosFXPlus gel documentation system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).
For DNA fingerprinting, only clear and scorable bands were considered for analysis. Each band of distinct size corresponds to a unique genetic locus. In constructing a binary matrix, replicated fragments were recorded as “present” (1) or “absent” (0).
The detectable level of polymorphism was determined by calculating the percentage of polymorphic amplicons relative to the total number of amplicons for each primer. Key genetic diversity indicators, such as the number of alleles, the Shannon information index (I), and the index of genetic differentiation (PhiPT), were determined using GenAlex 6.5. The dendrogram was constructed using the UPGMA method [55].

3. Results

3.1. P. anomala Ecological and Phytocenotic Confinement and Morphology

In the study region, P. anomala exhibits pronounced ecological plasticity and grows in various communities in the altitudinal range of 700–1850 m above sea level. The species grows on shadow-side slopes, intermountain depressions, among bushes, and in sparse dark coniferous and pine forests. P. anomala habitats in the foothills are related to the forest and bushy slopes with northern exposure. In the highlands, the species reside in alpine and subalpine meadows and Siberian larch (Larix sibirica Ledeb.) and Siberian pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour.) forests, and can also be found less often on uncultivated stony slopes. The shrub associations of P. anomala are formed in communities dominated by Spiraea media Schmidt, Rosa spinosissima L., Rosa acicularis Lindl., and Lonicera caerulea subsp. altaica (Pall.) Gladkova. In the areas of western and southern Altai, the species occurs in the dark coniferous forests of Pinus sibirica Du Tour and Picea obovata Ledeb. They also grow in soft deciduous forests dominated by Betula pendula Roth and Populus tremula L. Below are descriptions of the main populations of P. anomala in different regions of Kazakhstan Altai.
Southern Altai. Two populations of P. anomala, Belkaragai (P1) and Barlyk (P2) were identified and surveyed in the area of southern Altai (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Both populations are located in the Katon-Karagai district of the East Kazakhstan region.
P1 is located on the Sarymsakty ridge 5 km south of the village Belkaragai. Coordinates: 49°10′25.9″ N 85°18′16.7″ E, H—987 m. The population resides on the northwestern slope of a foothill terrace with a slight slope (8°). The total projective cover is 80%, and P. anomala accounts for approximately 6%. The ground cover is formed by sediment 1.5 cm thick; pet droppings are often noted. The species grows as part of Rosa spinosissima L.—P. anomalaFragaria vesca L.—Poa pratensis L. + Filipendula vulgaris Moench communities. The following species frequently occur in phytocenosis: Artemisia sericea Weber ex Stechm., Campanula sibirica L., Dactylis glomerata L., Galium verum L., and Thalictrum simplex L. The population is exposed to considerable anthropogenic loads (cattle grazing): individuals are trampled and die during the early stages of development. This factor affects the renewal of species in the population. In particular, generative and senile individuals dominate over young individuals of the virginal period, thereby defining the population as degenerating.
P2 is located 12 km southeast of Barlyk village, Bukhtarma valley, in the Katon-Kargai National Park. The coordinates are 49°16′41.8″ N 85°14′8.5″ E, H—898 m. The population resides on a relatively steep (20°), northeastern slope of the mountain. The total projective cover is 100%, and P. anomala occupies 5% of the cover. The ground cover is formed by fallen leaves and foliage, 2–2.5 cm thick. The species grows in a sparse birch–aspen (Betula pendula Roth, Populus tremula L.) forest; it is a part of Bromus inermis Leyss—Poa pratensis L.—Dactylis glomerata L.—Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim.—Geranium sylvaticum L.—Aconitum septentrionale Koelle—P. anomala communities. Among the species associated with phytocenosis: Carex acuta L., Rubus saxatilis L., R. idaeus L., Veratrum lobelianum Bernh., Spiraea chamaedryfolia L., Prunella vulgaris L. Logging for the care of birch and aspen plantations negatively influences this P. anomala population: plants are severely damaged by tree felling and transportation, which causes a subsequent decrease in the numbers of all age states of P. anomala, and young individuals cannot recover from the damage.
Kalba Altai. Two populations of P. anomala, Asubulakskaya (P3) and Taintinskaya (P4), located in the Ulan District of the East Kazakhstan Province, were examined in the Kalba Altai (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3).
P3 resides 10 km southeast of the village of Asubulak, on the western foothills of the Kalba Range coordinated within 49°31′53.22″ N, 83°5′14.98″ E, H—1136. The population occurs at the top of the mountain ridge; the microrelief is heterogeneous, formed of outcrops of large fragments of granite rocks and escarpments. The 12° slope faces northwest. The total projective cover is 100%, and P. anomala accounts for 15%. The ground cover comprises fallen leaves, needles, and the foliage of trees and is 3–3.5 cm thick. The species belong to P. anomala L.—Rosa spinosissima L.—Epilobium angustifolium L. communities along the edges of birch–pine (Pinus sylvestris L., Betula pendula Roth) forests. Secondary species in the community include Aconitum leucostomum Vorosch., Anthriscus sylvestris (L.) Hoffm., Dracocephalum ruyschiana L., Filipendula vulgaris Moench, Fragaria vesca L., Serratula coronata L., and Polemonium caeruleum L.
Peony plants in the surveyed population were not subjected to anthropogenic influence; therefore, no damage by diseases and pests was observed. Good seed and vegetative reproduction of 4–6 young plants per 1 m2 was noted. The population is complete, of the normal type, and able to hold the occupied area and to disperse to new territories.
P4 is located 15 km south of Tainty village, on the western foothills of the Kalba Range, coordinated in 49°17′49.9″ N, 83°6′42.52″ E, H—1152. The population is located on a steep northeastern slope (35°) of the mountain; the microrelief is leveled and slightly undulating. P. anomala accounts for about 35% of the total projective cover. The ground cover is formed by sediment 3–3.5 cm thick. The species comprise P. anomalaSpiraea media Schmidt communities. Associated species often include: Agrostis gigantea Roth, Aconitum leucostomum Worosch., Dactylis glomerata L., Phleum pratense L., Saussurea latifolia Ledeb., Geranium pratense L., Lathyrus pratensis L., and P. anomala, which form solid, clear thickets in places, and the individuals are powerfully developed multi-shrubs. In this population, anthropogenic influence was not observed, and populations of a normal type were observed in the presence of all age states. Habitat conditions in this population are optimal for species growth and development.
Western Altai. In the area of western Altai, near the village Poperechnoe, a population of P. anomala, denoted as P5, was examined (Figure 1 and Figure 2). P5 is located on the Ivanovsky ridge, in the vicinity of the Gray Meadow tract. P5 coordinates within 50°21′08.8″ N, 83°53′47.8″ E, H-1195 m. It is on the northeastern slope of the mountain (slope 18°), at the lower limit of the forest. P. anomala projective cover accounts for 20%. The ground cover is formed by sediment of 1.5–2 cm thickness. The species is related to Saussurea latifolia Ledeb. + P. anomala communities along the edges of a spruce (Picea obovata Ledeb.) forest with Betula pendula Roth and Abies sibirica Ledeb. This community includes Agrostis gigantea Roth, Veratrum lobelianum Bernh., Epilobium angustifolium L., Phlomoides alpina (Pall.) Adylov, Kamelin Makhm., Delphinium elatum L., and Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim. The P. anomala population ascends to the subalpine belt at a height of 1800 m on the Ivanovsky ridge and is part of the Trollius altaicus C.A. Mey. + Aquilegia glandulosa Fisch. ex. Link + P. anomala communities. The population is considered normal with a predominance of generative individuals, and it is not exposed to anthropogenic influence. The species in the given population reproduce mainly through vegetative means. Seed reproduction is poorly represented, and dense grasses displace young individuals during the early stages of development.
The populations of P. anomala in the area of southern Altai (P1, 2) are depressed due to anthropogenic impacts in the form of cattle grazing (P1) and logging (P2). These factors negatively affect the renewal of the species and are expressed in a small number of young individuals. The state of the species populations in the Kalba Altai (P3, 4) is close to optimum; these populations can hold the area they occupy and disperse to new territories. In the area of western Altai (P5), the state of P. anomala populations is normal, with a predominance of generative individuals.
Table 2 shows the morphological and quantitative indicators of the examined populations of P. anomala. According to the data obtained, the highest height and largest diameter of an adult bush was noted in P5 (107.6 ± 2.94 cm and 99.2 ± 5.96 cm), and the lowest height of an individual was identified in P1 (78.6 ± 2.11 cm), while the smallest bush diameter was found in P2 (72.6 ± 4.10 cm). The number of generative shoots per bush ranged from 2.73 ± 0.35 pcs (P2) to 13.53 ± 1.61 pcs (P4). In all surveyed populations, the number of vegetative shoots per adult was not significant (1–3 pcs). In P. anomala populations growing in meadow communities and among shrubs, individuals had a multi-shoot structure (6–18 pcs), and under gentle stands, in thin forests, the bushes were loose and had few shoots (3–5 pcs). In the surveyed populations, (1) the number of fruit leaflets was usually 5 or 3, and much less often, it was 4 or 2; (2) the number of individuals differed: the highest number of adults per 100 m2 was seen in P4 (11.2 ± 1.35 units), whereas the lowest was noted in P1 (4.93 ± 0.48 units). The greatest biomass of the aboveground part of a single individual was found in P4 (1.81 ± 0.05 kg), due to the greatest number of generative shoots. The lowest biomass of an aboveground part of a single plant was found in P2 (0.29 ± 0.03 kg). A similar situation was observed for the root biomass of a single adult, where the greatest mass was noted in P4 (2.69 ± 0.25 kg) and the lowest was found in P2 (0.98 ± 0.09 kg) (Figure 3).
The results of the chemical analysis from the soils of P. anomala study populations (Table 3) showed a high content of nitrate nitrogen, more than 30 mg/kg, in all samples. The highest N-NO3 values (52.9–58.9 mg/kg) were observed in P2, P4, and P5. The content of mobile phosphorus (P2O5) was low (7.7–12.6 mg/kg) in P1, P3, and P5, whereas it was average in P2 (23.9 mg/kg) and P4 (18.7 mg/kg). Exchangeable potassium (K2O) availability was elevated (395 and 530 mg/kg) in P1 and P5, whereas it was high in P2 (749 mg/kg), P3 (711 mg/kg), and P4 (676 mg/kg).
Soil pH had different values: P4 and P5 were characterized by slightly acidic soil (5.42 and 5.87), P3 by medium acidic soil (6.37), and P1 and P2 by neutral soil (7.14–7.88). The content of organic matter (humus) varied from medium (P4, P5) to elevated (P3) and high (P1, P2). Thus, the soils in P4 and P5 comprise leached chernozem, whereas those in P1, P2, and P3 comprise meadow chernozem.
The data showed that P. anomala biomorphology (height, bush width, number of shoots per individual) is significantly influenced by the content of N-NO3 and P2O5 in the soil. In P4 and P5 populations with high N-NO3 and P2O5 contents, the highest height of individuals (96.8 ± 2.87 and 107.6 ± 2.94 cm) was found, and a large bush diameter (87.6 ± 3.97 and 99.2 ± 5.96 cm) and number of shoots per bush (13.53 ± 1.61, 7.66 ± 0.76 pcs) were observed. Simultaneously, the humus content and pH in these populations were lower than those in other populations. Thus, the optimal soils for the growth of P. anomala are leached chernozem with a high content of N-NO3 and P2O5.

3.2. Floristic Composition of the P. anomala Communities

As a result of literature data processing, field studies, and herbarium materials in the floristic composition of plant communities, 130 species of P. anomala were recorded, belonging to 35 families and 101 genera (Appendix A).
The fractional classification of ecological groups allowed the analysis of the composition of the flora of P. anomala plant communities and revealed the dominance of mesophytes (60%), mesoxerophytes (12%), and hygromesophytes (10%) for 108 groups of species (83%) out of the total species composition.
The systematic analysis of the flora composition of P. anomala plant communities showed that, regarding the number of species, the major families were Asteraceae Bercht. J. Presl. (17 species, 13%), Rosaceae Juss. (17 species, 13%), Poaceae Barnhart (15 species, 10%), Ranunculaceae Juss. (12 species, 9%), Fabaceae Lindl. (7 species, 5%), Apiaceae Lindl. (6 species, 4%), and Lamiaceae Martinov (6 species, 4%). They account for 80 (61%) species of the total composition of the community flora.
A chorological analysis of the composition of P. anomala plant communities reveald that the Eurasian group (54%), the Asian group (24%), and the Holarctic group (15%) are represented the most, whereas the proportion of cosmopolitan group was relatively low (5%).
In all surveyed populations, mesophytic plants were the most common: Sanguisorba officinalis, Trifolium pratense, Veratrum lobelianum, Vicia sepium, V. cracca, Poa pratensis, Polemonium caeruleum, Dactylis glomerata, Anthriscus sylvestris, Thalictrum flavum, Galium boreale, Aconitum leucostomum, Epilobium angustifolium, Geranium pratense and Filipendula ulmaria.

3.3. Variability in the Anatomical Structure of P. anomala Aboveground Organs

Regarding leaf anatomical structure, P. anomala leaves are large, glabrous, long-petioled, and bipartite. The terminal leaflets are deeply pinnatipartite, with lanceolate elongate lobes; the margins are entire. On cross-section, the leaf is flat and dorsoventral (Figure 4). Leaf veins protrude considerably from the underside of the leaf. A leaf is surrounded by cells of the upper and lower epidermis on both sides; it is shaped with thickened outer walls. The epidermal surface is smooth; single simple trichomes on the upper side, mainly in the area of the middle vein, are observed in some plant specimens. Thus, trichomes were noted in plants from the P1, P4, and P5 populations, whereas no trichomes were noted in P2 and P3 leaf samples. The columnar mesophyll consists of a single layer of cells, whereas the spongy mesophyll is multilayered. The conductive bundle is collateral, of the closed type. The xylem is oriented toward the upper epidermis and the phloem is oriented toward the lower side. The Xylem zone is surrounded by mechanical tissue sclerenchyma.
Regarding stem anatomical structure, the P. anomala stem has a typical anatomical structure of dicotyledonous plants. In the cross-section, the stem is rounded, smooth, and without pubescence (Figure 5).
A single-layer epidermis surrounds the stem perimeter. Its cells are rounded, with considerably thickened outer cells and cuticles, the layer of which is thicker in the joints of the cells. Beneath the epidermis, there is a single-layer collenchyma, under which a multilayered chlorenchyma lies (2 to 6 layers). The conductive zone is of the bundle or transitional type. The fascicles are large, oval or broadly ovate, collateral, and of closed type (no cambium). The bundle is reinforced on both sides by sections of sclerenchyma. The inner part is filled with loose and thin-walled cells of the medullary parenchyma, which can break down to form air-carrying cavities.
Leaf petiole anatomical structure. P. anomala is characterized by grooved radial-type petioles with well-developed veins in the ventral part (Figure 6).
The abaxial (dorsal) and adaxial (ventral) sides of the petioles are well expressed. The shape of the cross-section is curved with thinned lateral ears. The covering tissue is composed of small, distinctly shaped epidermal cells. The outer wall of the epidermis is thicker than the inner wall and is covered by a cuticle layer. The adaxial side has rare simple multicellular trichomes. The epidermal cells have an assimilatory tissue, the chlorenchyma, composed of 2–3 rows of cells. Chlorenchyma cells are thin-walled, rounded, or elliptical, and may vary in size. Collateral conductive bundles are the closed type with varying shapes and sizes. Lateral conductive bundles appear well developed and are located in the petiole abaxial part; they are usually broadly ovate. The abdomen bundles are small in size and oval or elliptical. Xylem in bundles faces toward the center, phloem toward the periphery. “Caps” of sclerenchyma mechanical tissue are marked above the fascicles. The interfascicular parenchyma is not woody. Parenchyma cells form the petiole central part, which may collapse into old leaves, forming cavities.
The comparison of leaf anatomical parameters, leaf petiole, and stem collected in different populations reveals differences in the thickness of tissue sections and individual cells (Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6).

3.4. Genetic Diversity of P. anomala Population

The amplification of P. anomala DNA resulted in clearly distinguishable amplicons, which varied in number, depending on the primer used (Figure 7).
To study the genetic variability of P. anomala wild populations, only clear scorable bands were considered since each band of unique size corresponds to a unique locus. The presence or absence of a band in the amplification profiles of a particular genotype was used to construct a binary matrix. Reproducible fragments were scored as present (1) or absent (0).
On average, each primer generated 126 fragments, 51% of which appeared polymorphic. Fragment sizes ranged from 500 to 3500 bp. The use of primers influenced the variety of polymorphism levels, from 46% (primer 2230) to 56% (primer 2253) (Table 7).
Each peony sample was distinguished by a unique amplification profile, which allowed the determination of indicators of genetic diversity, reflecting the level of variability in the study populations based on DNA fingerprint data (Table 8).
The evaluation of genetic diversity of P. anomala populations revealed the maximum number of amplified Na fragments in the P3 population (1.167), whereas the minimum value of this index (0.796) was in the P2 population. The ranking of populations according to the Shannon diversity index in descending order is as follows: P4 (0.271) > P5 (0.255) > P1 (0.238) > P3 (0.211) > P2 (0.156).
The results of molecular variance (AMOVA) (Table 9) demonstrated that the majority (67%) of the molecular variability in P. anomala was due to intrapopulation variability (64%), whereas the level of interpopulation variability was only 34%.
The results of the permutation test were used to estimate the probability of error and indicated the significance and reliability of differences between populations (ϕPT = 0.364, p < 0.001).
The data obtained by amplification with iPBS primers from different P. anomala populations were used for cluster analysis and the construction of the UPMGA dendrogram (Figure 8).
The results of cluster analysis showed that the iPBS amplification results were positively correlated with the geographical data of the P. anomala sample collection site. As a result, a tree formed by three clades can be observed. The first clade is formed by populations P3 and P4, which are geographically very close. P1 and P2 of P. anomala populations that are also neighbor each other geographically form two mutually dependent branches on the dendrogram.

4. Discussion

In the study region, P. anomala grows under different ecological conditions and at altitudes (from 700 to 1850 m). Other authors [69,70,71,72] have confirmed the high ecological plasticity of the species. However, the species do not tolerate the excessive overwatering or drying of their habitat.
The morphological parameters of P. anomala study populations in East Kazakhstan (height, bush diameter, number of leaves per shoot) significantly exceed those of the Siberian populations. For example, the height of generative shoots in Siberia (in the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Region) is 58.9 ± 2.5 cm [69], while the lowest individual height in the study populations of Eastern Kazakhstan is 78.6 ± 2.11 cm (P1). The average number of leaves per generative shoot in Siberia reached 5.6 ± 0.7 eq. [69], whereas in surveyed populations, the number of generative shoots is from 8.50 ± 0.32 eq. (P3) to 9.83 ± 0.28 eq. (P5). The morphometric parameters of P. anomala Kazakhstan populations are close to those of West Siberia, where adult generative individuals of the species have 3–17 shoots of 92–107 cm in height [70].
The analysis of the spectra of geographical elements of floras of various ranks, including the flora of plant communities within the scope of given classification units (cenoflora), is one of the main tools of comparative floristics [73]. The floristic composition of a plant community is a set of plant species that form communities of any rank and any type of vegetation [74]. From this viewpoint, the floristic composition of plant communities of species populations represents the association of historically and cenotic homogeneous groups of species within a syntax, which makes them the most important indicators of plant cover from the level of a particular phytocenosis to altitudinal-belt divisions. These are the most important points of contact between floristics and geobotany [75].
A chorological analysis of the flora composition of P. anomala plant communities showed that the Eurasian (54%) and Asian groups (24%) were the most richly represented. Such a distribution of species ranges is generally characteristic of the flora of the study region. The systematic analysis of the species distribution of P. anomala communities also agrees with the data on the flora of Kazakhstan Altai [76].
Intensive land use, pollution, and the overexploitation of wild plant resources are causing a significant decline worldwide [77]. P. anomala, being a valuable botanical resource, underscores the essential need for the understanding of its biodiversity to preserve its bioresource potential. Current data indicate that research on this species has not been fully conducted, especially for the Kazakhstan populations of peonies, which are strongly affected by anthropogenic and anthropogenic factors, resulting in a greater risk of reducing reproduction and subsequent reduction in wild populations.
The analysis of the microscopic parameters of P. anomala leaves from different populations revealed that the maximum size of cells and tissues was reliably observed in P3, and the minimum in P2 and P1. No reliable differences between leaf plate lateral width and lower epidermis thickness were found. The general anatomical structures are the same; the populations differ by the presence or absence of trichomes. Populations P5, P4, and P1 have trichomes, and their lengths reliably differ according to the point of collection. In populations P3 and P2, trichomes were not found (Table 4).
When comparing the individual microscopic parameters of the P. anomala stem, it was found that there was no reliable difference between P5 and P4 populations in terms of epidermis thickness, chlorenchyma, and conductive bundle width. As for the previous leaf organ, in the stem structure, the maximum values of cell and tissue sizes were noted in the P3 population and the minimum was identified in P1 (Table 5).
For the leaf petiole, the scatter of dimensional characters for plant samples from different populations was also determined. No significant difference was found between the measures of epidermal thickness, most of the values of the thickness of chlorenchyma, or the thickness and length of the lateral conductive bundle. Maximum values of leaf petiole thickness were found in P3, and minimum values were found in P5. Maximum thickness of the epidermis was observed in P1, and the minimum in P5. Chlorenchyma thickness and lateral conductive bundle length were largest in specimens from P1 and smallest in P2. The maximum thickness of lateral conductive bundle and trichome length were recorded in plants from P1 and the minimum thickness was recorded in plants from P2 (Table 6).
A comparison of anatomical parameters of the leaf and stem in different populations showed a slight difference in the thickness of tissue sections and individual cells. The largest sizes of cells and tissues was observed in population P3, and the minimal values were observed in population P5.
Genetic diversity can be assessed using various modern approaches [70,78,79]. However, when selecting the optimal marker type, their prevalence in the genome and the possibility of identification via PCR methods play an important role. Retrotransposons, as a constantly changing composition of the genome of any eukaryotic species, have an advantage in the assessment of genetic polymorphism compared with other markers because they do not require prior data of the DNA sequence and give more reproducible results, which is especially important in studies of rare or little-studied plant species [78,80,81,82].
Retrotransposons are numerous, evolve rapidly, and are widespread in plant genomes. Retrotransposons are susceptible to environmental changes, so bursts of their activity can cause the induction of structural changes in the genome, contributing to rapid adaptation to changing external conditions, which is especially important for wild populations with low genetic diversity [83,84,85].
Many endemic species have low adaptive potential in changing climate conditions. Their adaptation is largely caused by the activation of retrotransposons and their ability to regulate the expression of nearby genes in response to stress [86]. The dispersed nature of retrotransposons in the plant genome is one of the reasons why they can be used as a marker system for studying genetic polymorphism, just like AFLP and SSR markers [87].
Retrotransposons are unique, very stable, and can be considered Mendelian loci. They can be identified in various retrotransposon families via PCR amplification with primers derived from LTR (long terminal repeat) or conserved PBS sequences (primer binding sites). Various applications have now been developed to exploit polymorphisms in TE insertion patterns. Alternatively, retrotransposons can be mapped using high-performance next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics to develop primers that will yield simple-to-use codominant markers [88].
When using retrotransposons as markers, universal tRNA primer sites (iPBS—PrimerBindingSite) can be used to develop PCR primers [89]. The special mechanism of transposition inherent to retrotransposons, in which retrotransposon sequences are often located side-by-side in an inverted orientation, allows for amplification between the iPBS sections of retrotransposons using primers complementary to interspersed repeats [90].
This type of marker was used to study the genetic polymorphism of 65 tree peony specimens; it has been shown that iPBS can be used for the classification and research of the genetic diversity of various tree peony species [90]. With respect to populations of the shirking peony, studies to identify genetic polymorphisms have not been conducted; however, there are single publications using microsatellite markers [91] as well as chloroplast and nuclear genome markers [92]. The use of retrotransposons as markers for the analysis of P. anomala natural populations is mentioned only in one publication, where primers for the putative LTR sequences of retrotransposons were developed as a result of bioinformatics analysis. Due to the low efficiency of the developed primers, data on the analysis of P. anomala population polymorphism are not given [79].
The lowest indicators of biodiversity were found in the P. anomala population (P2), although this group was located in favorable conditions. This is probably because the area of projective covering of P. anomala in the given population was minimal (4–5%), owing to competition with other species, and due to the influence of anthropogenic factors, individuals of the given population were limited to interbreeding. One potential contributing factor is the significant amount of damage inflicted on P. anomala plants during logging activities. As a result, young P. anomala individuals are unable to recover from such damage. In addition, the mature and heavy seeds of P. anomala tend to disperse around the parent plant and are poorly transported by meltwater and wind due to dense grass vegetation. Distribution through endozoochry is not typical for these species; there are no reports of animals consuming its seeds [93].
Urbanization has had a significant effect on the natural environment, which leads to a decrease in the habitat of the species and impedes the flow of genes through seeds. Our research has revealed that the differentiation of the populations of Kazakhstan is relatively low, which may indicate the long-term existence of these populations as part of a larger population. Our assumption aligns with existing studies [94] that have established the rationale behind the low differentiation among populations of perennial P. ludlowii. This phenomenon is the result of genetic drift during a period when the species occupied adjacent habitats. Relatively low, but statistically significant, genetic differentiation among P. ludlowii populations is due to a shared ancestry rather than extensive gene flow.
The hierarchical arrangement of populations in the cluster further supports our assumption. The P5 population forms a separate branch, located at a distance from the other populations, which confirms the genetic isolation of this population. The geographic remoteness of the P5 population determines the accumulation of mutations in the gene pool, potentially giving rise to unique genotypes and genetic differentiation. In other populations, we observed the loss and fragmentation of habitat as a result of anthropogenic impacts, such as livestock grazing, deforestation, and the uncontrolled collection of P. anomala plants by the local community.
The low level of genetic differentiation of natural populations of P. anomala identified in this study underscores the significance of recognizing each population of P. anomala as a valuable genetic resource. The recognition of P. anomala as a valuable genetic resource is pivotal for developing a strategy for the conservation of this valuable medicinal plant. It is impossible to say that one population has greater or lesser priority for conservation than others; each holds equal importance in ensuring the survival of the species. Priority in developing a strategy for the conservation of genetic diversity should be given to the establishment of a germplasm resource bank for all populations of these species. This strategy should integrate in situ, ex situ, and in vitro conservation technologies to protect the genetic diversity of P. anomala.
We propose the existence of a single large population of P. anomala in the Kazakhstan Altai region on the basis of genetic polymorphism analysis using iPBS markers, the nature of population distribution, and genetic distances across populations. Despite the uniqueness of the amplification profiles in the P5 population, common loci characteristics of all P. anomala study populations were identified. This indicates genetic similarity and evolutionary unity among P. anomala populations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A.K.; methodology, S.A.K., O.N.K. and M.Y.I.; software, A.S.T. and D.T.A.; validation, A.K.S., A.S.T., A.A.I. and M.Z.Z.; formal analysis, A.S.T.; investigation, S.A.K., A.S.T., O.N.K. and M.Y.I.; resources, S.A.K. and D.T.A.; data curation, S.A.K. and A.S.T.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.K., A.S.T., O.N.K. and M.Y.I.; writing—review and editing, S.A.K.; visualization, S.A.K.; supervision, M.Z.Z.; project administration, M.Z.Z.; funding acquisition, S.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (No. AP19680461).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed in the present study are available from the author A.K. Sarkytbayeva upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are sincerely grateful to the anonymous reviewers for all their valuable comments on the first version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Appendix A. Floristic Composition of P. anomala Study Plots

Species NameAbundance on the Brown–Blanke Scale (1928)Ecological GroupArea
P1P2P3P4P5
1Abies sibirica Ledeb. +Mas.
2Achillea ledebourii Heimerl 1 2Mas.
3Aconitum leucostomum Vorosch. 222MPas.
4Aconitum septentrionale Koelle 2 Meuras.
5Agrostis gigantea Roth 33HMholarc.
6Alfredia cernua Cass. 112 HMas.
7Allium microdictyon Prokh. 1HMholarc.
8Alopecurus arundinaceus Poir. 2 12Meuras.
9Angelica sylvestris L. 1 Meuras.
10Anthriscus sylvestris (L.) Hoffm.2 211Meuras.
11Aquilegia glandulosa Fisch. ex Link. 1 3MXas.
12Artemisia sericea Weber ex Stechm.2 Meuras.
13Artemisia vulgaris L. 2 Mcosm.
14Betula pendula Roth 11 +Meuras.
15Bistorta officinalis Delarbre 21 Meuras.
16Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) P.Beauv.121 2Meuras.
17Bromus inermis Leyss. 4 Meuras.
18Bupleurum aureum Fisch. ex Hoffm.1 21 Mas.
19Calamagrostis obtusata Trin. 22 1Meuras.
20Calamagrostis purpurea (Trin.) Trin. 1 2HMholarc.
21Campanula sibirica L.2 MXeuras.
22Caragana arborescens Lam. 1 1 MXas.
23Carex acuta L. 2 Heuras.
24Carex pediformis var. macroura (Meinsh.) Kük. 111 MXas.
25Cerastium arvense L. 1 1Mholarc.
26Cirsium heterophyllum (L.) Hill1 1 2Meuras.
27Clematis alpina subsp. sibirica (L.) Kuntze 11 1Mas.
28Clematis integrifolia L. 1 MXeuras.
29Cotoneaster laxiflorus J.Jacq. ex Lindl.2 MXeuras.
30Cotoneaster uniflorus Bunge 112Peuras.
31Crepis capillaris (L.) Wallr. 12 1Meuras.
32Crepis sibirica L. 2Meuras.
33Dactylis glomerata L.24222Meuras.
34Delphinium elatum L. 2Meuras.
35Dracocephalum ruyschiana L.1 3 Meuras.
36Elymus caninus (L.) L.12 21Mholarc.
37Equisetum sylvaticum L. 1 Mholarc.
38Epilobium angustifolium L. 15 3Mholarc.
39Erythronium sibiricum (Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Krylov 2Mas.
40Euphorbia pilosa L. 2MPas.
41Festuca kryloviana Reverd. 2Pas.
42Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim. 3 2HMeuras.
43Filipendula vulgaris Moench2 3 MXeuras.
44Fragaria vesca L.3 2 Mcosm.
45Galatella sedifolia (L.) Greuter1 11 MXas.
46Galium boreale L.21111Mholarc.
47Galium verum L.2 1 Mcosm.
48Geranium albiflorum Ledeb.11 2MPas.
49Geranium albiflorum Ledeb. 1 2 MPas.
50Geranium collinum Stephan ex Willd.2 2 2MXeuras.
51Geranium pratense L. 2 MXeuras.
52Geranium pseudosibiricum Maxim.1 111MXeuras.
53Geum rivale L. 1Hholarc.
54Hedysarum theinum Krasnob. 1MPas.
55Heracleum dissectum Ledeb. 1 1Mas.
56Heracleum sibiricum L.1 21 Mas.
57Hesperis matronalis L. 1 1HMas.
58Hypericum perforatum L.2 1 1Mholarc.
59Iris ruthenica Ker Gawl.1 11MXas.
60Koenigia alpina (All.) T.M. Schust. & Reveal1 1 Meuras.
61Lamium album L.1 211Mholarc.
62Larix sibirica Ledeb. 1Meuras.
63Lathyrus gmelinii (Fisch. ex Ser.) Fritsch11 1HMeuras.
64Lathyrus pratensis L.2 2 HMeuras.
65Leuzea carthamoides (Willd.) DC. 1 1MPas.
66Ligularia glauca (L.) O.Hoffm.21 2 MXeuras.
67Lilium martagon L.1+ Meuras.
68Linaria vulgaris Mill.211 Meuras.
69Lolium giganteum (L.) Darbysh. 11 Meuras.
70Lonicera caerulea subsp. altaica (Pall.) Gladkova1 1MPas.
71Lonicera tatarica L.11 + MXeuras.
72Melica altissima L. 1 2 MXeuras.
73Mentha asiatica Boriss.1 HMholarc.
74Milium effusum L. 111 Mholarc.
75Origanum vulgare L. 2 Meuras.
76Oxalis acetosella L. 1 1HMholarc.
77Paeonia anomala L.22353Mas.
78Parasenecio hastatus (L.) H.Koyama11 11Mholarc.
79Peucedanum morisonii Besser ex Schult. 1 MXas.
80Phleum pratense L. 3 Meuras.
81Phlomoides alpina (Pall.) Adylov, Kamelin & Makhm. 3Pas.
82Phlomoides tuberosa (L.) Moench2 MXeuras.
83Picea obovata Ledeb. +HMeuras.
84Pinus sylvestris L. 1 Meuras.
85Pleurospermum uralense Hoffm. 1 11Meuras.
86Poa pratensis L.32221Mholarc.
87Polemonium caeruleum L.11212Meuras.
88Populus tremula L. 1 Meuras.
89Potentilla chrysantha Trevir. 121 Meuras.
90Potentilla recta L. 2 Meuras.
91Primula veris subsp. macrocalyx (Bunge) Lüdi1121 Meuras.
92Prunella vulgaris L. 2 Mcosm.
93Prunus padus L.1111 Meuras.
94Pulmonaria mollis Wulfen ex Hornem. 1 1Meuras.
95Ranunculus acris L. 2Heuras.
96Ranunculus repens L.1 Heuras.
97Ribes atropurpureum C.A.Mey. 1Mas.
98Ribes nigrum L. 2HMeuras.
99Rosa acicularis Lindl.12 1Mholarc.
100Rosa spinosissima L.414 Mholarc.
101Rubus idaeus L. 2 2Meuras.
102Rubus saxatilis L. 2 Meuras.
103Rumex acetosella L. 1 Meuras.
104Salix bebbiana Sarg.11 1MPeuras.
105Salix caprea L.11 1HMas.
106Salix viminalis L.11 1Has.
107Sambucus racemosa L. 1Meuras.
108Sanguisorba officinalis L.21122Mholarc.
109Saussurea elegans Ledeb. 21 Mas.
110Saussurea latifolia Ledeb. 35Mas.
111Serratula coronata L. 3 Meuras.
112Silene graminifolia Otth1 12 Pas.
113Solidago virgaurea L. 1 2Meuras.
114Sonchus arvensis L.2 Mcosm.
115Sorbus aucuparia subsp. glabrata (Wimm. Grab.) Hedl.1 1Meuras.
116Spiraea chamaedryfolia L. 21 Meuras.
117Spiraea media Schmidt1 41Meuras.
118Stipa capillata L.1 1 Xeuras.
119Tanacetum vulgare L.1 12 Meuras.
120Thalictrum flavum L. 1112Meuras.
121Thalictrum flavum L. 1112Meuras.
122Trifolium pratense L.12311Meuras.
123Trollius altaicus C.A. Mey. 3MPas.
124Urtica dioica L.12 2Mcosm.
125Veratrum lobelianum Bernh. 2312MPeuras.
126Veronica longifolia L. 2 Meuras.
127Vicia cracca L.12112Mholarc.
128Vicia sepium L.21122Meuras.
129Viola altaica Ker Gawl. 1Pas.
130Viola hastata Michx.1 1Meuras.
Ecological groups: H—hygrophytes; HM- hygromesophytes; M—mesophytes; MX—mesoxerophytes; MP—mesopsychrophytes; X—xerophytes; P—psychrophytes. Area: The groups of floral elements: cosm.—Cosmopolitan; holarc.—Holarctic; euras.—Eurasian; as.—Asian.

References

  1. De-Yuan, H.; Kai-Yu, P. A taxonomic revision of the Paeonia anomala complex (Paeoniaceae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2004, 91, 87–98. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdullina, S.A. List of Vascular Plants of Kazakhstan; Ministry of Science Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan Institute of Botany and Phyto Introduction: Almaty, Kazakhstan, 1999; p. 187. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  3. Ryabushkina, N.; Gemedjieva, N.; Kobaisy, M.; Cantrell, C.L. Brief review of Kazakhstan flora and use of its wild species. Asian Australas. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2008, 2, 64–71. [Google Scholar]
  4. Punina, E.O.; Machs, E.M.; Krapivskaya, E.E.; Kim, E.S.; Mordak, E.V.; Myakoshina, Y.A.; Rodionov, A.V. Interspecific hybridization in the genus Paeonia (Paeoniaceae): Polymorphic sites in transcribed spacers of the 45S rRNA genes as indicators of natural and artificial peony hybrids. Russ. J. Genet. 2012, 48, 684–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dai, K.M.; Ying, T.H. A new species of the genus Paeonia from China. Bull. Bot. Res. 1990, 10, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hong, D. Peonies of the World: Taxonomy and Phytogeography; Royal Botanic Gardens: Richmond, UK, 2010; pp. 1–302. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vereshchagina, I.V. Wild Peonies of the Altai; Publishing House of Alt. un-ta: Barnaul, Russia, 2003; p. 230. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, S.Q. Karyotype in Paeonia intermedia CA Mey. Bangladesh J. Bot. 2014, 43, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Takechi, M.; Tanaka, Y. Antiviral substances from the root of Paeonia species. Planta Med. 1982, 45, 252–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ikuta, A.; Kamiya, K.; Satake, T.; Saiki, Y. Triterpenoids from callus tissue cultures of Paeonia species. Phytochemistry 1995, 38, 1203–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Murakami, N.; Saka, M.; Shimada, H.; Matsuda, H.; Yamahara, J.; Yoshikawa, M. New bioactive monoterpene glycosides from Paeoniae Radix. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1996, 44, 1279–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nawaz, H.R.; Malik, A.; Khan, P.M.; Shujaat, S.; Rahman, A.U. A novel β-glucuronidase inhibiting triterpenoid from Paeonia emodi. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 48, 1771–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Okubo, T.; Nagai, F.; Seto, T.; Satoh, K.; Ushiyama, K.; Kano, I. The inhibition of phenylhydroquinone-induced oxidative DNA cleavage by constituents of Moutan Cortex and Paeoniae Radix. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 23, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Stavri, M.; Mathew, K.T.; Bucar, F.; Gibbons, S. Pangelin, an antimycobacterial coumarin from Ducrosia anethifolia. Planta Med. 2003, 69, 956–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, S.L.; Song, J.Z.; Choi, F.F.; Qiao, C.F.; Zhou, Y.; Han, Q.B.; Xu, H.X. Chemical profiling of Radix Paeoniae evaluated by ultra-performance liquid chromatography/photo-diode-array/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2009, 49, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. He, C.N.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, Y.C.; Xu, L.J.; Gu, J.; Xiao, P.G. Phytochemical and biological studies of Paeoniaceae. Chem. Biodivers. 2010, 7, 805–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lu, M.; Hu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhai, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, J. Comparative chemical profiling of three TCM drugs in the Paeoniaceae family by UPLC-MS/MS combined with chemometric methods. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2019, 83, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, Y.; Li, S.S.; da Silva, J.A.T.; Yu, X.N.; Wang, L.S. Characterization of phytochemicals in the roots of wild herbaceous peonies from China and screening for medicinal resources. Phytochemistry 2020, 174, 112331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liapina, L.A.; Kondashevskaia, M.V.; Ziadetdinova, G.A.; Uspenskaia, M.S. Comparative study of anticoagulants obtained from various extracts of Paeonia anomala. Izv. Akad. Nauk. Seriia Biol. 2000, 3, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, S.M.Y.; Li, M.L.Y.; Tse, Y.C.; Leung, S.C.L.; Lee, M.M.S.; Tsui, S.K.W.; Waye, M.M.Y. Paeoniae Radix, a Chinese herbal extract, inhibit hepatoma cells growth by inducing apoptosis in a p53 independent pathway. Life Sci. 2002, 71, 2267–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Li, J.; Xiong, X.; Liu, Y. Protective effect of paeoniflorin against optic nerve crush. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 27, 650–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Park, S.G.; Lee, M.J.; Jung, H.J.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, H.; Na, S.T.; Park, W.H. Preventive effects of peony root extracts on oxidative stress, thrombosis and atherosclerosis. J. Korean Med. 2009, 30, 88–103. [Google Scholar]
  23. Song, S.; Xiao, X.; Guo, D.; Mo, L.; Bu, C.; Ye, W.; Yang, X. Protective effects of Paeoniflorin against AOPP-induced oxidative injury in HUVECs by blocking the ROS-HIF-1α/VEGF pathway. Phytomedicine 2017, 34, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, X.X.; Cheng, F.Y.; Xian, H.L.; Peng, L.P. Genetic diversity and population structure of endangered endemic Paeonia jishanensis in China and conservation implications. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2016, 66, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ouyang, J.; Xu, H.; Li, M.; Dai, X.; Fu, F.; Zhang, X.; Lan, Q. Paeoniflorin exerts antitumor effects by inactivating S phase kinase-associated protein 2 in glioma cells. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 39, 1052–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Manayi, A.; Omidpanah, S.; Barreca, D.; Ficarra, S.; Daglia, M.; Nabavi, S.F.; Nabavi, S.M. Neuroprotective effects of paeoniflorin in neurodegenerative diseases of the central nervous system. Phytochem. Rev. 2017, 16, 1173–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Yu, G.; Nie, X.; Jia, W.; Liu, R.E.; Xu, R. Paeoniflorin inhibits migration and invasion of human glioblastoma cells via suppression transforming growth factor β-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Neurochem. Res. 2018, 43, 760–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yang, F.; Li, Y.; Sheng, X.; Liu, Y. Paeoniflorin treatment regulates TLR4/NF-κB signaling, reduces cerebral oxidative stress and improves white matter integrity in neonatal hypoxic brain injury. Korean J. Physiol. Pharm. 2021, 25, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, J.; Ren, Y.; Lou, Z.G.; Wan, X.; Weng, G.B.; Dong, C. Paeoniflorin inhibits the growth of bladder carcinoma via deactivation of STAT3. Acta Pharm. 2018, 68, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, D.; Liu, L.; Li, S.; Wang, C. Effects of paeoniflorin on neurobehavior, oxidative stress, brain insulin signaling, and synaptic alterations in intracerebroventricular streptozotocin-induced cognitive impairment in mice. Physiol. Behav. 2018, 191, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Qiu, Z.K.; He, J.L.; Liu, X.; Zeng, J.; Xiao, W.; Fan, Q.H.; Chen, J.S. Anxiolytic-like effects of paeoniflorin in an animal model of post traumatic stress disorder. Metab. Brain Dis. 2018, 33, 1175–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zapesochnaya, G.G.; Kurkin, V.A.; Avdeeva, E.V.; Popov, D.M.; Kolpakova, M.V. A chemical study of the roots of Paeonia anomala. Chem. Nat. Compd. 1992, 28, 45–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xian, L.; Li, S.H.; Pu, J.X.; Huang, S.X.; Sun, H.D. Chemical constituents from Paeonia anomala subsp. veitchii (Paeoniaceae). Plant Divers. 2007, 29, 259. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ligaa, U.; Davaasürėn, B.; Ninzhil, N. Medicinal Plants of Mongolia Used in Western and Eastern Medicine; Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAN: Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 2009; p. 208. [Google Scholar]
  35. Walton, E.F.; McLaren, G.F.; Boldingh., H.L. Seasonal patterns of starch and sugar accumulation in herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora Pall.). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2007, 82, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vereshchagina, I.V. Intraspecific variability of Altai peony species. Bot. Stud. Sib. Kazakhstan 1996, 2, 173–186. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  37. Takhtajan, A. Flowering Plants; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; p. 27. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kubentayev, S.A.; Kotukhov, Y.A.; Danilova, A.N.; Suleimenov, A.N.; Sumbembayev, A.A. Phytocoenotic structure and stocks of main medical plants in southern part of Altai Mountain System (East Kazakhstan). J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 2019, 16, 2822–2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kubentayev, S.A.; Mukhtubaeva, S.K.; Kubentayeva, B.B.; Izbastina, K.S.; Khalymbetova, A.E.; Kotukhov, Y.A. Current state of populations and ontogenesis allium altaicum pall.(amaryllidaceae) in kazakhstan. Pak. J. Bot. 2022, 54, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kubentayev, S.A.; Zhumagul, M.Z.; Kurmanbayeva, M.S.; Alibekov, D.T.; Kotukhov, J.A.; Sitpayeva, G.T.; Izbastina, K.S. Current state of populations of Rhodiola rosea L.(Crassulaceae) in East Kazakhstan. Bot. Stud. 2021, 62, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. The Red Book of Kazakhstan; Astana Ltd.: Astana, Kazakhstan, 2014; Volume 2, p. 452. (In Russian)
  42. Mironova, L.N.; Reut, A.A.; Muldashev, A.A.; Maslova, N.V.; Galeyeva, A.K. Paeonia anomala (Paeoniaceae) in natural environment and in cultivation in Republic of Bashkortostan. Rastit. Resur. 2012, 48, 192–201. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  43. Samoilov, Y.M. Ecological and biological peculiarities of evasive peony (Paeonia anomala L.) of the ivanovo population (Western Altai). Bot. Stud. Sib. Kazakhstan 2006, 12, 100–105. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  44. Muldashev, A.A.; Maslova, N.V.; Galeeva, A.H. Age composition of the relict population of Paeonia anomala L. in the Republic of Bashkortostan (Southern Urals). Agrar. Ross. 2009, 6-II, 187–188. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mironova, L.N.; Reut, A.A. Bioecological features of the rare species Paeonia anomala ex situ. Ecol. Monit. Biodivers. 2013, 1, 30–33. [Google Scholar]
  46. Samoylenko, Z.A.; Sviridenko, B.F. New paeonia anomala populations found in surgutsky district of khanty-mansiysk autonomous area-yugra. Bull. Nizhnevartovsk State Univ. 2019, 2, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Komina, O.V.; Vasilieva, O.Y. Assessment of stability and productivity of species of the genus Paeonia L. of local and foreign flora. Bull. Krasn. State Agrar. Univ. 2019, 8, 17–23. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  48. Sumembayev, A.A.; Danilova, A.N. The comparative morphometric analysis of seeds representatives of the genus Paeonia L.(Paeoniaceae Rudolphi) of the Kazakh Altai’s flora, introduced in the Altai Botanical Garden. Bull. Karaganda Univ. Biol. Med. Geogr. Ser. 2021, 101, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kubentaev, S.A.; Kotukhov, Y.A.; Izbastina, K.S.; Sarkytbaeva, A.K.; Zhumagul, M.J.; Mukhtubaeva, S.K. Ecological and phytocoenotic habitat and seasonal rhythm of development of Paeonia anomala L. in East Kazakhstan. Bull. Karaganda University Ser. Biol. Med. Geogr. 2021, 103, 80–86. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yuan, J.H.; Cheng, F.Y.; Zhou, S.L. Genetic structure of the tree peony (Paeonia rockii) and the Qinling Mountains as a geographic barrier driving the fragmentation of a large population. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, S.Q. Genetic diversity and population structure of the endangered species Paeonia decomposita endemic to China and implications for its conservation. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lim, M.Y.; Jana, S.; Sivanesan, I.; Park, H.R.; Hwang, J.H.; Park, Y.H.; Jeong, B.R. Analysis of genetic variability using RAPD markers in Paeonia spp. grown in Korea. Korean J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 2013, 31, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fan, Y.; Wang, Q.; Dong, Z.; Yin, Y.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Yu, X. Advances in molecular biology of Paeonia L. Planta 2020, 251, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xue, Y.; Liu, R.; Xue, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, X. Genetic diversity and relatedness analysis of nine wild species of tree peony based on simple sequence repeats markers. Hortic. Plant J. 2021, 7, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kalendar, R.; Antonius, K.; Smýkal, P.; Schulman, A.H. iPBS: A universal method for DNA fingerprinting and retrotransposon isolation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121, 1419–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Doungous, O.; Kalendar, R.; Adiobo, A.; Schulman, A.H. Retrotransposon molecular markers resolve cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) and taro (Colocasia esculenta) by type and variety. Euphytica 2015, 206, 541–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Khapilina, O.; Raiser, O.; Danilova, A.; Shevtsov, V.; Turzhanova, A.; Kalendar, R. DNA profiling and assessment of genetic diversity of relict species Allium altaicum Pall. on the territory of Altai. PeerJ 2021, 9, e10674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Carracedo, M.G.; Alonso, S.B.; Cabrera, R.S.B.; Jiménez-Arias, D.; Pérez Pérez, J.A. Development of retrotransposon-based molecular markers for characterization of Persea americana (Avocado) cultivars and horticultural races. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Egorina, A.V.; Zinchenko, Y.K.; Zinchenko, E.S. Physical Geography of East Kazakhstan; Alpha-Press: Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan, 2003; p. 87. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  60. Kashin, A.S.; Kritskaya, T.A.; Petrova, N.A.; Shilova, I.V. Methods of Studying Cenopopulations of Flowering Plants: Teaching Manual for Masters of the Faculty of Biology; Izd. of Saratov University: Saratov, Russia, 2015; p. 127. [Google Scholar]
  61. Orazov, A.E.; Mukhitdinov, N.M.; Myrzagalieva, A.B.; Turuspekov, Y.K.; Shramko, G.; Kubentaev, S.A. Distribution and characteristics of cenopopulations of Amygdalus ledebouriana Schlecht. On the territory of the Narym ridge. Exp. Biol. 2019, 78, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Uranov, A.A. Vital state of a species in a plant community. Bull. Mosc. Soc. Nat. Dep. Biol. 1969, 1, 141–149. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  63. Golubev, V.N.; Molchanov, E.F. Methodological guidelines for population-quantitative and ecological-biological study of rare, endangered and endemic plants of the Crimea. Yalta 1978, 41. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  64. Kuminova, A.V. Vegetation cover of Altai; Academic Publishing: Novosibirsk, Russian, 1960; p. 449. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  65. POWO Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 2022. Available online: http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ (accessed on 9 October 2021).
  66. Lotova, L.I. Botany: Morphology and Anatomy of Vascular Plants; MAKS Press: Moscow, Russia, 2007; 512p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  67. Prenner, G.; Rudall, P.J. Comparative ontogeny of the cyathium in Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) and its allies: Exploring the organ–flower–inflorescence boundary. Am. J. Bot. 2007, 94, 1612–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Kalendar, R.; Boronnikova, S.; Seppanen, M. Isolation and purification of DNA from complicated biological samples. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2222, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sviridenko, B.F.; Efremov, A.N.; Samojlenko, Z.A. The condition of the populations of Paeonia anomala (Paeoniaceae) at the northern edge of the West Siberian habitat. Bull. Tomsk State University Biol. 2010, 3, 38–46. [Google Scholar]
  70. Semenova, G.P. Rare and Endangered Species of Siberian Flora: Biology, Conservation; “Geo” Academic Publishing: Novosibirsk, Russian, 2007; p. 408. [Google Scholar]
  71. Malysheva, R.M. Peonies in the Tomsk Region; Tomsk University Publishing House: Tomsk, Russia, 1975; p. 117. [Google Scholar]
  72. Diaz Martinez, S.; Boedeker, C.; Zuccarello, G.C. Genetic data support reproductively isolated species in the endemic Cladophoraceae (Chlorophyta) of Lake Baikal, Russia. Phycologia 2020, 59, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yurtsev, B.A.; Kamelin, R.V. Basic Concepts and Terms of Floristics; Perm State University: Perm, Russia, 1991; 198p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  74. Kupriyanov, A.N.; Turalin, B.A.; Kurbatova, N.V.; Kurmanbaeva, M.S.; Abidkulova, K.T.; Bazargalieva, A.A. Red Data Book of Kazakhstan: Crambe tataria sebeok. Bot. Res. Sib. Kazakhstan 2020, 26, 28–47. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  75. Kamelin, R.V. Kuhistan District of Mountainous Central Asia; Nauka: Leningrad, Russia, 1979; 117p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  76. Kotukhov, Y.A. List of vascular plants of the Kazakhstan Altai. Jubil. Editor. Board 2005, 67, 11–83. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  77. Monastersky, R. Biodiversity: Life–a status report. Nat. News 2014, 516, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Shimira, F.; Boyaci, H.F.; Çilesiz, Y.; Nadeem, M.A.; Baloch, F.S.; Taşkin, H. Exploring the genetic diversity and population structure of scarlet eggplant germplasm from Rwanda through iPBS-retrotransposon markers. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 6323–6333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Boronnikova, S.V.; Kalendar, R.N. Using IRAP markers for analysis of genetic variability in populations of resource and rare species of plants. Russ. J. Genet. 2010, 46, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Khapilina, O.; Turzhanova, A.; Danilova, A.; Tumenbayeva, A.; Shevtsov, V.; Kotukhov, Y.; Kalendar, R. Primer Binding Site (PBS) Profiling of Genetic Diversity of Natural Populations of Endemic Species Allium ledebourianum Schult. BioTech 2021, 10, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Haliloğlu, K.; Türkoğlu, A.; Öztürk, H.I.; Özkan, G.; Elkoca, E.; Poczai, P. iPBS-Retrotransposon Markers in the Analysis of Genetic Diversity among Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Germplasm from Türkiye. Genes 2022, 13, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Terletskaya, N.V.; Turzhanova, A.S.; Khapilina, O.N.; Zhumagul, M.Z.; Meduntseva, N.D.; Kudrina, N.O.; Korbozova, N.K.; Kubentayev, S.A.; Kalendar, R. Genetic Diversity in Natural Populations of Rhodiola Species of Different Adaptation Strategies. Genes 2023, 14, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Casacuberta, E.; González, J. The impact of transposable elements in environmental adaptation. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22, 1503–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hou, J.; Lu, D.; Mason, A.S.; Li, B.; Xiao, M.; An, S.; Fu, D. Non-coding RNAs and transposable elements in plant genomes: Emergence, regulatory mechanisms and roles in plant development and stress responses. Planta 2019, 250, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liu, Y.; El-Kassaby, Y.A. Novel insights into plant genome evolution and adaptation as revealed through transposable elements and non-coding RNAs in conifers. Genes 2019, 10, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kalendar, R.; Sabot, F.; Rodriguez, F.; Karlov, G.I.; Natali, L.; Alix, K. Mobile elements and plant genome evolution, comparative analyzes and computational tools. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 735134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Mondini, L.; Noorani, A.; Pagnotta, M.A. Assessing plant genetic diversity by molecular tools. Diversity 2009, 1, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kalendar, R.; Amenov, A.; Daniyarov, A. Use of retrotransposon-derived genetic markers to analyse genomic variability in plants. Funct. Plant Biol. 2019, 46, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kalendar, R.; Schulman, A.H. Transposon-based tagging: IRAP, REMAP, and iPBS. Mol. Plant Taxon. Methods Protoc. 2014, 1115, 233–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Duan, Y.B.; Guo, D.L.; Guo, L.L.; Wei, D.F.; Hou, X.G. Genetic diversity analysis of tree peony germplasm using iPBS markers. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 7556–7566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ji, L.; da Silva, J.A.T.; Zhang, J.; Tang, Z.; Yu, X. Development and application of 15 novel polymorphic microsatellite markers for sect. Paeonia (Paeonia L.). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2014, 54, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Pan, J.; Zhang, D.; Sang, T. Molecular phylogenetic evidence for the origin of a diploid hybrid of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2007, 94, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ahmad, F.; Tabassum, N. Preliminary phytochemical, acute oral toxicity and antihepatotoxic study of roots of Paeonia officinalis Linn. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2013, 3, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhao, Y.J.; Yin, G.S.; Gong, X. RAD-sequencing improves the genetic characterization of a threatened tree peony (Paeonia ludlowii) endemic to China: Implications for conservation. Plant Divers. 2023, 45, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. P. anomala populations in different ecological conditions (P1P5) (photo by S. Kubentayev).
Figure 1. P. anomala populations in different ecological conditions (P1P5) (photo by S. Kubentayev).
Diversity 15 01127 g001
Figure 2. Geographic locations of P. anomala populations (P1–P5) (map was created using ArcGIS Desktop 10.8.2).
Figure 2. Geographic locations of P. anomala populations (P1–P5) (map was created using ArcGIS Desktop 10.8.2).
Diversity 15 01127 g002
Figure 3. P. anomala external structure from the Kalba Altai ((A)—population; (B)—generative individual in the flowering phase; (C)—fruit (multiple leaflets) from 2 to 5 leaflets; (D)—flower; (E)—leaf; (F)—seeds; (G)—stamens and pistils; (H)—flower petals) (scale 1 cm).
Figure 3. P. anomala external structure from the Kalba Altai ((A)—population; (B)—generative individual in the flowering phase; (C)—fruit (multiple leaflets) from 2 to 5 leaflets; (D)—flower; (E)—leaf; (F)—seeds; (G)—stamens and pistils; (H)—flower petals) (scale 1 cm).
Diversity 15 01127 g003
Figure 4. Cross-section of P. anomala leaf. Fragment in the area of the middle vein ((A)—P5 population. Mag. 16 × 20); photomicrographs leaf cross-sections of different P. anomala populations. Mag. 16 × 20. ((B)—P4 population; (C)—P3 population; (D)—P2 population; (E)—P1 population). UE—upper epidermis; LE—lower epidermis; Tri—trichomes; Xyl—xylem; Phl—phloem; CM—columnar mesophyll; SM—spongy mesophyll; Collen—collenchyma.
Figure 4. Cross-section of P. anomala leaf. Fragment in the area of the middle vein ((A)—P5 population. Mag. 16 × 20); photomicrographs leaf cross-sections of different P. anomala populations. Mag. 16 × 20. ((B)—P4 population; (C)—P3 population; (D)—P2 population; (E)—P1 population). UE—upper epidermis; LE—lower epidermis; Tri—trichomes; Xyl—xylem; Phl—phloem; CM—columnar mesophyll; SM—spongy mesophyll; Collen—collenchyma.
Diversity 15 01127 g004
Figure 5. P. anomala stem cross-section ((A)—fragment. P5 population. Mag. 16 × 4); photomicrographs of fragments of transverse sections of P. anomala stem from different populations. Mag. 16 × 4. ((B)—P1 population; (C)—P2 population; (D)—P3 population; (E)—P4 population). Ep—epidermis; chlor—chlorenchyma; phl—phloem; xyl—xylem; paren—cord parenchyma; scler—sclerenchyma.
Figure 5. P. anomala stem cross-section ((A)—fragment. P5 population. Mag. 16 × 4); photomicrographs of fragments of transverse sections of P. anomala stem from different populations. Mag. 16 × 4. ((B)—P1 population; (C)—P2 population; (D)—P3 population; (E)—P4 population). Ep—epidermis; chlor—chlorenchyma; phl—phloem; xyl—xylem; paren—cord parenchyma; scler—sclerenchyma.
Diversity 15 01127 g005
Figure 6. P. anomala leaf petiole cross-section. Lateral fragment. ((A)—P5 population. Mag. 16 × 20); photomicrographs of fragments of cross-sections of leaf petioles of P. anomala from different populations. Mag. 16 × 4. ((B)—P4 population; (C)—P3 population; (D)—P2 population; (E)—P1 population). Ep—epidermis; Collen—collenchyma; Chl—chlorenchyma; Scler—sclerenchyma; Phl—phloem; Xyl—xylem; Paren—core parenchyma.
Figure 6. P. anomala leaf petiole cross-section. Lateral fragment. ((A)—P5 population. Mag. 16 × 20); photomicrographs of fragments of cross-sections of leaf petioles of P. anomala from different populations. Mag. 16 × 4. ((B)—P4 population; (C)—P3 population; (D)—P2 population; (E)—P1 population). Ep—epidermis; Collen—collenchyma; Chl—chlorenchyma; Scler—sclerenchyma; Phl—phloem; Xyl—xylem; Paren—core parenchyma.
Diversity 15 01127 g006
Figure 7. Electropherogram of amplification results of individual DNA samples from P. anomala populations with primer 2256. Samples from populations P1 (1–6), P2 (7–12), P3 (13–18), P4 (19–24), P5 (25–30); M—Thermo Scientific GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix (100–10,000 bp).
Figure 7. Electropherogram of amplification results of individual DNA samples from P. anomala populations with primer 2256. Samples from populations P1 (1–6), P2 (7–12), P3 (13–18), P4 (19–24), P5 (25–30); M—Thermo Scientific GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix (100–10,000 bp).
Diversity 15 01127 g007
Figure 8. Dendrogram of genetic distances of P. anomala populations, performed using the UPGMA method based on the results of iPBS amplification.
Figure 8. Dendrogram of genetic distances of P. anomala populations, performed using the UPGMA method based on the results of iPBS amplification.
Diversity 15 01127 g008
Table 1. Characteristics of iPBS primers, used for P. anomala genetic diversity analysis.
Table 1. Characteristics of iPBS primers, used for P. anomala genetic diversity analysis.
IDSequenceTm (°C)CG (%)Optimal Annealing
Ta (°C)
2230tctaggcgtctgatacca545052.9
2237cccctacctggcgtgcca6572.255
2240aacctggctcagatgcca58.955.655
2253tcgaggctctagatacca53.45051
Table 2. Quantitative and morphological indicators of P. anomala specimens from the study plots P1–P5.
Table 2. Quantitative and morphological indicators of P. anomala specimens from the study plots P1–P5.
No.Quantitative and Morphological CharacteristicsP. anomala Study Populations
P1P2P3P4P5
1Height of generative individuals at the time of fruiting (cm)78.6 ± 2.1181.1 ± 3.7586.3 ± 2.4596.8 ± 2.87107.6 ± 2.94
2Diameter of an adult bush (cm)86.1 ± 4.5572.6 ± 4.1073.6 ± 5.7187.6 ± 3.9799.2 ± 5.96
3Number of shoots per bush (pcs)gen.6.45 ± 0.622.73 ± 0.355.26 ± 0.6513.53 ± 1.617.66 ± 0.76
veg.1.93 ± 0.341.00 ± 0.250.93 ± 0.220.66 ± 0.251.86 ± 0.32
4Number of leaves on one generative shoot (pcs)9.62 ± 0.249.06 ± 0.448.50 ± 0.329.13 ± 0.369.83 ± 0.28
5Stem diameter (mm)9.33 ± 0.458.33 ± 0.3110.1 ± 0.5210.3 ± 0.4611.1 ± 0.39
6Leaf blade size from the middle part of the shoot (cm)length14.7 ± 0.5320.4 ± 0.5719.5 ± 0.6816.8 ± 0.4824.4 ± 0.63
width20.5 ± 0.5527.0 ± 1.0228.3 ± 0.6821.9 ± 0.7331.9 ± 0.58
7Leaf petiole size (cm)length8.00 ± 0.369.15 ± 0.289.44 ± 0.4710.2 ± 0.3110.9 ± 0.29
thickness0.22 ± 0.010.32 ± 0.020.42 ± 0.020.46 ± 0.020.48 ± 0.03
8Fruit size (multi-leaf) (cm)diameter5.45 ± 0.306.10 ± 0.305.68 ± 0.185.43 ± 0.205.23 ± 0.18
thickness1.11 ± 0.041.41 ± 0.061.05 ± 0.041.17 ± 0.061.12 ± 0.03
9Number of leaflets of the fruit (multiple leaflets) (pcs)4.26 ± 0.224.22 ± 0.173.86 ± 0.274.13 ± 0.233.80 ± 0.26
10Number of generative individuals per 100 m2 (pcs)4.93 ± 0.485.13 ± 0.596.6 ± 0.6211.2 ± 1.357.21 ± 0.63
11Raw biomass of the aboveground part of one generative individual (kg)0.59 ± 0.040.29 ± 0.030.54 ± 0.041.81 ± 0.051.22 ± 0.52
12Weight of raw root of one generative individual (kg)1.10 ± 0.240.98 ± 0.091.32 ± 0.112.69 ± 0.251.95 ± 0.18
Table 3. Content of nutrients in the soil.
Table 3. Content of nutrients in the soil.
No.PopulationSoil LayerN-NO3, mg/kgP2O5, mg/kgK2O, mg/kgHumus, %pH
1P10–3035.59.73959.947.14
2P20–3055.023.974910.397.88
3P30–3035.97.77117.326.37
4P40–3052.918.76765.285.42
5P50–3058.912.65305.305.87
Table 4. Quantitative indices of individual cells and tissues of P. anomala leaf from different populations (in μm).
Table 4. Quantitative indices of individual cells and tissues of P. anomala leaf from different populations (in μm).
IndicatorsP. anomala Populations
P1P2P3P4P5
The thickness of leaf at midrib5.88 ± 0.05 ns5.89 ± 0.006 *6.14 ± 0.03 *6.11 ± 0.05 *5.91 ± 0.02 *
Leaf width on the side2.98 ± 0.004 ns3.00 ± 0.04 ns3.15 ± 0.01 ns3.12 ± 0.04 ns3.09 ± 0.03 ns
Diameter of the conductive bundle2.31 ± 0.02 *2.41 ± 0.004 *2.58 ± 0.06 ns2.54 ± 0.02 *2.46 ± 0.01 *
The thickness of the lower epidermis0.32 ± 0.02 ns0.34 ± 0.008 ns0.40 ± 0.030 ns0.37 ± 0.005 ns0.36 ± 0.005 ns
The thickness of the upper epidermis0,40 ± 0.005 *0.41 ± 0.005 *0.51 ± 0.005 *0.46 ± 0.006 ns0.45 ± 0.004 *
Trichome length1.31 ± 0.004 *--1.42 ± 0.008 *1.36 ± 0.005 *
Columnar mesophyll thickness0.97 ± 0.006 *0.94 ± 0.004 *1.14 ± 0.004 *1.12 ± 0.006 *1.09 ± 0.004 *
The thickness of spongy mesophyll1.42 ± 0.005 *1.40 ± 0.006 *1.61 ± 0.005 *1.58 ± 0.005 *1.55 ± 0.003 *
Phloem thickness in the conductive bundle0.51 ± 0.003 *0.48 ± 0.02 *0.64 ± 0.004 *0.59 ± 0.003 *0.54 ± 0.002 *
Xylem thickness in the conductive bundle1.60 ± 0.04 ns1.57 ± 0.006 *1.70 ± 0.008 *1.68 ± 0.008 ns1.64 ± 0.02 *
*—shows a reliable difference in a number of measurements (p < 0.05); ns—no reliable difference in the results of measurements (p > 0.05).
Table 5. Measurements of stem individual cells and tissues of P. anomala from different populations (in μm).
Table 5. Measurements of stem individual cells and tissues of P. anomala from different populations (in μm).
IndicatorsPaeonia anomala Populations
P1P2P3P4P5
Epidermis thickness1.65 ± 0.0078 *1.70 ± 0.06 ns1.86 ± 0.04 ns1.82 ± 0.01 ns1.78 ± 0.03 ns
Chlorenchyma thickness2.80 ± 0.006 *2.85 ± 0.007 *3.12 ± 0.006 *2.95 ± 0.051 ns2.89 ± 0.007 ns
Conductive beam length10.2 ± 0.09 *10.5 ± 0.15 ns12.8 ± 0.22 *11.3 ± 0.09 *10.6 ± 0.16 *
Conductive beam width11.98 ± 0.18 *12.35 ± 0.20 ns13.61 ± 0.16 *12.08 ± 0.23 ns12.44 ± 0.11 ns
*—shows a reliable difference in a number of measurements (p < 0.05); ns—no reliable difference in the results of measurements (p > 0.05).
Table 6. Measures of P. anomala leaf petiole individual cells and tissues from different populations (in μm).
Table 6. Measures of P. anomala leaf petiole individual cells and tissues from different populations (in μm).
IndicatorsP. anomala Populations
P1P2P3P4P5
Leaf petiole thickness6.20 ± 0.09 ns6.09 ± 0.009 ns6.92 ± 0.11 *6.28 ± 0.08 ns6.15 ± 0.04 ns
Epidermis thickness0.41 ± 0.011 ns0.40 ± 0.008 ns0.39 ± 0.07 ns0.42 ± 0.11 ns0.35 ± 0.06 ns
Chlorenchyma thickness0.83 ± 0.016 ns0.72 ± 0.014 *0.80 ± 0.024 ns0.79 ± 0.013 ns0.82 ± 0.017 ns
Side conductive bundle length2.20 ± 0.024 *1.93 ± 0.010 *1.98 ± 0.05 *2.15 ± 0.014 *2.11 ± 0.008 *
The thickness of the lateral conductive bundle1.35 ± 0.030 *1.06 ± 0.012 ns1.20 ± 0.05 ns1.32 ± 0.14 ns1.11 ± 0.025 ns
Trichome length1.36 ± 0.023 ns1.14 ± 0.009 *1.33 ± 0.016 ns1.22 ± 0.015 *1.32 ± 0.009 *
*—shows a reliable difference in a number of measurements (p < 0.05); ns—no reliable difference in the results of measurements (p > 0.05).
Table 7. Amplification result of iPBS primers, used for P. anomala genetic diversity analysis.
Table 7. Amplification result of iPBS primers, used for P. anomala genetic diversity analysis.
IDSequenceTotal Number of LociNumber of Polymorphic Loci (%)
2230tctaggcgtctgatacca13246
2237cccctacctggcgtgcca13851
2240aacctggctcagatgcca10349
2253tcgaggctctagatacca13256
Average12651
Table 8. Genetic diversity of P. anomala populations through amplification with iPBS primers.
Table 8. Genetic diversity of P. anomala populations through amplification with iPBS primers.
PopulationNaNeIHeuHe
P11.0561.2580.2380.1560.170
P20.7961.1710.1560.1020.111
P31.1671.1960.2110.1310.143
P41.1481.2960.2710.1790.195
P51.0741.2860.2550.1690.184
Average1.0481.2410.2260.1470.161
Table 9. Results of AMOVA analysis of P. anomala populations via iPBS amplification.
Table 9. Results of AMOVA analysis of P. anomala populations via iPBS amplification.
VariabilitydfSSMSEst. Var.%ϕPT
Between populations4100,53325,133324336%0.364
Within populations25141,8335673567364%-
General29242,36730,8068917100%-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kubentayev, S.A.; Khapilina, O.N.; Ishmuratova, M.Y.; Sarkytbayeva, A.K.; Turzhanova, A.S.; Imanbayeva, A.A.; Alibekov, D.T.; Zhumagul, M.Z. Current State of Natural Populations of Paeonia anomala (Paeoniaceae) in East Kazakhstan. Diversity 2023, 15, 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15111127

AMA Style

Kubentayev SA, Khapilina ON, Ishmuratova MY, Sarkytbayeva AK, Turzhanova AS, Imanbayeva AA, Alibekov DT, Zhumagul MZ. Current State of Natural Populations of Paeonia anomala (Paeoniaceae) in East Kazakhstan. Diversity. 2023; 15(11):1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15111127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kubentayev, Serik A., Oxana N. Khapilina, Margarita Yu. Ishmuratova, Aisulu K. Sarkytbayeva, Ainur S. Turzhanova, Akzhunis A. Imanbayeva, Daniyar T. Alibekov, and Moldir Z. Zhumagul. 2023. "Current State of Natural Populations of Paeonia anomala (Paeoniaceae) in East Kazakhstan" Diversity 15, no. 11: 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15111127

APA Style

Kubentayev, S. A., Khapilina, O. N., Ishmuratova, M. Y., Sarkytbayeva, A. K., Turzhanova, A. S., Imanbayeva, A. A., Alibekov, D. T., & Zhumagul, M. Z. (2023). Current State of Natural Populations of Paeonia anomala (Paeoniaceae) in East Kazakhstan. Diversity, 15(11), 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15111127

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop