Next Article in Journal
Optical Systems Identification through Rayleigh Backscattering
Previous Article in Journal
Blockchain-Modeled Edge-Computing-Based Smart Home Monitoring System with Energy Usage Prediction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 23
Issue 11
10.3390/s23115268
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Water-Soluble Poly(propylene imine) Dendrimer Modified with 4-Sulfo-1,8-naphthalimide Units: Sensing Properties and Logic Gates Mimicking

by
Awad I. Said
1,2,*,
Desislava Staneva
3 and
Ivo Grabchev
1,*
1
Faculty of Medicine, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, 1407 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt
3
Department of Textile, Leader, and Fuels, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 1756 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(11), 5268; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115268
Submission received: 28 April 2023 / Revised: 28 May 2023 / Accepted: 30 May 2023 / Published: 1 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 1,8-Naphthalimide Derivatives as Signal Elements in Chemical Sensors)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A new water-soluble poly(propylene imine) dendrimer (PPI) modified with 4-sulfo-1,8-naphthalimid units (SNID) and its related structure monomer analog (SNIM) has been prepared by a simple synthesis. The aqueous solution of the monomer exhibited aggregation-induced emission (AIE) at 395 nm, while the dendrimer emitted at 470 nm due to an excimer formation beside the AIE at 395 nm. Fluorescence emission of the aqueous solution of either SNIM or SNID was significantly affected by traces of different miscible organic solvents, and the limits of detection were found to be less than 0.05% (v/v). Moreover, SNID exhibited the function to execute molecular size-based logic gates where it mimics XNOR and INHIBIT logic gates using water and ethanol as inputs and the AIE/excimer emissions as outputs. Hence, the concomitant execution of both XNOR and INHIBIT enables SNID to mimic digital comparators.

1. Introduction

Dendrimers are three-dimensional star-shaped supramolecular architectures having various functional groups in the structure. They have recently been attracting the attention of scientists as an alternative to linear and branched polymers due to their unique structural features, including large surface area and the flexibility to incorporate different compounds into their periphery or interior parts [1,2,3]. Over the last two decades, numerous structural scaffolds for dendrimers have been reported, ranging from pure organic molecular frameworks to organometallic and biomaterials [4,5,6]. Exploration of dendrimers applications in supramolecular chemistry is still ongoing. Recently, many reports have presented their potential in drug delivery [7], tissue engineering [8], bio-imaging [9], catalysis [10], cancer therapy [11], and a variety of other applications. Luminescent dendrimers are indispensable components in high-technology industries, particularly optoelectronics, light-harvesting antennae in solar cells, sensors for detecting pollutants in the environment, biology, and medicine [12,13,14].
The peripheral functionalization of dendrimers with different chromophores such as dansyl sulfonate [15,16], pyrene [17], azobenzenes [18], and coumarin [19,20] moieties and their potential applications have been described. Our previous works have been focused on the functionalization of poly(amidoamine) [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30] and poly(propylene amine) [31,32,33,34] dendrimers by 1,8-naphthalimide chromophor groups and studied their potential as sensors for transition metal cations and pH. 1,8-Naphthalimides are promising fluorophores for designing fluorescent sensors because of their good photostability, strong fluorescence emission, high quantum yield, and flexibility to be modified. Molecular architectures based on 1,8-naphthalimides are well-known assemblies with bright emissive color, high photostability, and sensor activities for colorimetric and fluorometric probing [35,36,37,38,39].
Aggregation-based luminogens are non-emissive molecules that become highly emissive in solution by limiting their intramolecular rotation (RIR) in the aggregated state [40]. There are many reports about the applications of AIEgens, including liquid crystals [41], organic light-emitting diodes (OLED) [42], photoluminescent agents [43], and sensors [44]. Moreover, aggregation makes some organic fluorophores exhibit a new red-shifted emission caused by excited dimers, excimers, formed by associating two fluorophore units when they are a close vicinity to each other [45]. There are two kinds of excimers (i) dynamic excimers [46] resulting from associating a fluorophore in the excited state and (ii) static excimers that are formed in the ground state [47]. These excimers absorb like monomers, but the emission is red-shifted related to monomer emission [48,49]. The excimer emission is extremely sensitive to the polarity of the solvent [50].
Water contamination by organic solvents is disadvantageous for the progress of chemical reactions, biological processes, pharmaceuticals, and foodstuffs production [51,52,53,54]. Traditional methods for detecting traces of water in organic solvents, such as analytical, chromatographic, and electrochemical methods, suffer from many drawbacks like toxic agents, expensive instruments, and complicated operations [55,56,57]. Recently, many organic molecular sensors for detecting water pollution have been reported, though they require multistep synthesis, and the sensitivity achieved is low [58,59,60].
Recently, there has been considerable progress in developing optical molecular sensing systems to mimic logic gates and operations for incorporation into information technology instead of silicon-based ones [61,62,63,64,65]. A digital comparator to compare two inputs can be constructed by the combinational logic circuit of three INHIBIT logic gates [66,67] or of XNOR/INHIBIT gates [68,69].
In this work, a novel water-soluble PPA dendrimer modified with 4-sulfo-1,8-naphthalimides units was synthesised as a part of our ongoing research on the synthesis and characterization of novel periphery functionalized with 1,8-naphthalimides dendrimers. The monomer of the dendrimer has also been synthesized and examined so that the results from the investigations of the photophysical properties, solvatchromism, and sensory function of both the monomer and the dendrimer could be compared. Experiments on the excimer formation induced by the aggregation of the dendrimer were carried out as well. Moreover, the function of both compounds to mimic logic gates was studied.

2. Materials and Methods

The first generation (poly propylene imine) dendrimer (PPI), 4-Sulfo-1,8-naphthalic anhydride potassium salt and N,N-dimethyltrimethylenediamine were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used without purification. All used solvents (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA): dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimetjylformamide (DMF), tetrahydrofuran (THF), dichloromethane (DCM), ethanol, dioxane were of spectroscopic grade purity. 1H and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded at ambient temperature in DMSO-d6 as a solvent on a Bruker Avance II+ 600 spectrometer operating at 600.13 MHz and 151 MHz, respectively. The UV-Vis absorption and emission spectra were recorded on Varian Cary 5000 UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer and on a “Cary Eclipse” spectrofluorometer, respectively, using 1 cm optical path length quartz cuvettes (Hellma, Müllheim im Markgräflerland, Germany). Slits width of 5 nm for the excitation and emission. All of the measurements were measured at 25.0 °C. TLC monitoring was conducted using silica gel (Fluka F60 254 20 × 20; 0.2 mm) and toluene/methanol/ (4:1) as an eluent. OriginPro 8 software for data processing has been used. Stock solutions of SNIM and SNID were prepared in DMF as 10−2 M to ensure negligible volumes of the stock to reach the required concentration (3 μL for 10−5 M and 1.5 μL for 5 × 10−6 M) using 3 mL as a total volume of the solvent(s).

2.1. Synthesis of Potassium 2-(3-(Dimethylamino)propyl)-1,3-dioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[de]isoquinoline-6-sulfonate SNIM

N,N-Dimethyltrimethylenediamine (250 μL, 2 mmole) were added dropwise to a suspension of 4-sulfo-1,8-naphthalic anhydride 1 (0.53 gm, 1.7 mmole) in 25 mL of ethanol and was refluxed for 4 h. The final product was isolated after filtration of the solid and washing with ethanol. Yield 95%, 0.61 g, m.p. > 300 °C.
FT-IR (KBr) cm−1: 3080 (νCH (Aromatic)); 2960, 2860, 2810, 2780 (νCH (Aliphatic)); 1700, 1650 (νC=O). 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 9.24 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 8.49 (dd, J = 7.2, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 8.46 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.21 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (dd, J = 8.6, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 4.09–4.04 (m, 2H), 2.31 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.12 (s, 6H), 1.80–1.72 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.1, 163.6, 150.2, 134.5, 130.8, 130.6, 128.6, 128.0, 127.3, 125.4, 123.2, 122.6, 57.2, 45.5, 38.7, 25.9. Analysis: C17H17N2O5K S (400.22 g mol−1): Calc. (%): C-46.60, H 4.40, N 7.25; Found (%): C-46.83, H 4.44, N 7.31.

2.2. Synthesis of 4-Sulfo-1.8-naphalimide Based PPI Dendrimer SNID

The poly(propylene imine) dendrimer from first generation (0.32 g, 1 mmol) and 4-sulfo-1,8-naphthalic anhydride 1 (1.3 g, 4 mmol) were refluxed in 25 mL ethanol, and the reaction progress has been monitored by TLC. After 4 h, the product was filtered, washed with ethanol, and dried. Yield: 1.34 g (98%), decomposed at temperatures higher than 300 °C.
FT-IR (KBr) cm−1: 3070 (νCH (Aromatic)); 2950, 2850, 2810 (νCH (Aliphatic)); 1695, 1651 (νC=O). 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 9.21 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.2 Hz, 4H, Ar-H), 8.43 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H, Ar-H), 8.38 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H, Ar-H), 8.20 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H, Ar-H), 7.81 (dd, J = 8.6, 7.3 Hz, 4H, Ar-H), 4.13–4.03 (m, 8H, (OC)2NCH2), 3.10–2.80 (m, 4H, CH2N<), 2.60–2.55 (m, 8H, CH2N(CO)2), 1.83–1.74 (m, 8H, (OC)2NCH2CH2CH2N), 1.51–1.43 (m, 4H, >CH2CH2CH2CH2N<). 13C NMR (151 MHz, DMSO) δ 164.0 (C=O), 163.6 (C=O), 150.0, 134.4, 130.7, 130.49, 128.5, 127.9, 127.2, 125.5, 123.3, 122.5 (10 Ar. C), 51.4, 38.9, 25.4 (aliph C). Analysis: C64H52N6O20K4S4 (1509.15 g mol−1): Calc. (%): C-50.89, H 3.45, N 5.57; Found (%): C-50.80, H 3.49, N 5.52.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Design and Synthesis of the Probe

The synthesis of 4-sulfo-1,8-naphthalimide-modified PPA dendrimer SNID and its related monomer SNIM is presented in Scheme 1. Their chemical structures were confirmed by UV-Vis absorption, fluorescent, FT-IR, and NMR spectra (Figures S1–S6). The π-π stacking of 1,8-naphthalimide units is favoured in water, and hence, aggregation-induced emission AIE is possible. The function of the dendrimer scaffold is to stick close to the 4-sulfo-1,8-naphthalimde moieties, thus enabling the aggregation-induced excimer formation in water.

3.2. Photophysical Characteristics

The influence of solvent polarity on the absorption and emission spectra of SNIM and SNID has been investigated, and the respective data have been summarized in Table 1. The absorption spectra of monomer and dendrimer have an absorption band in the range of 300–370 nm corresponding to the 4-sulfo-1,8-naphthalimide chromophore group, Figure 1. While the absorption band was characterized by a well-developed vibrational fine structure in most solvents, the structure is almost blurred in the hydroxylic solvents due to hydrogen bonding with the solvent molecules and π–π stacking that restricts the vibrational transitions. The position of the absorption band is not affected significantly by the solvent polarity, suggesting that these compounds in the ground state are not sensitive to the polarity of the environment. The solvent polarity has an impact only on the vibrational transitions. On the other hand, the absorption spectra of the dendrimer SNID in different solvents are similar to the ones of the monomer SNIM, except the molar extinction coefficients at the absorption maxima, which are approximately four times higher than those of the monomer SNIM, which indicates the full substitution of the primary amino groups in the dendrimer periphery by 4-sulfo-1,8-naphthalimide units [70].
Regarding fluorescence emission, after excitation at 340 nm, the monomer gives a strong fluorescence emission centred at 392 nm only in water, Figure 2A. It is attributed to the monomer molecules aggregation that is induced by the π–π stacking. This stacking restricts the nonradiative vibrational de-excitations processes of the excited molecules. Moreover, the monomer SNIM gives a weak emission in ethanol and DCM due to the vague formation of aggregates in these solvents. The fluorescence emission observed in THF, despite the well-developed vibrational fine structure of the absorption band, refers to the aggregation favoured in the excited state rather than in the ground state. Strikingly, the behaviour of the dendrimer in water is different from that of the monomer, where besides the emission at 395 nm, which is weaker, a strong emission centred at 475 nm is observed (Figure 2B). This is confirmed by the photograph of the CNID and SNIM compounds dissolved in water, DMF, and ethanol and irradiated with monochromatic UV light at 366 nm. The figure shows the blue-green fluorescence emission of CNID in an aqueous solution, while SNIM emits blue fluorescence (Figure 2C). The former emission, as mentioned above, is caused by the excimer formation of 4-sulfo-1,8-naphthalimide units, while that of the latter is due to the aggregation of dendrimer molecules [71].
The discriminated fluorescence emission of the monomer and its dendrimer in water encouraged us to investigate the applicability of these compounds as probes for quantitative measurements of the purity of water contaminated with another miscible organic solvent. We used ethanol, DMF, and dioxane as representatives for polar protic and aprotic and nonpolar solvents, respectively. Moreover, we investigated the influence of water traces in the solvents on the emission response of the SNIM and SNID.

3.3. Solvatochromism of SNIM

It has been found that ethanol has no effect on the emission of the aqueous solution of SNIM till 60% (v/v) of ethanol. Higher amounts of ethanol (>60%) led to emission quenching at 395 nm due to the dissociation of aggregates by ethanol molecules. On the other hand, fluorescence emission at 395 nm of ethanol solution of SNIM has enhanced by adding water, Figure 3. The limit of detection (LOD) for water presence in ethanol was found to be 0.09% by volume. LOD was calculated using LOD = 3σ/b [38], where b is the slop and σ is the standard deviation. The increase in the emission by adding water is ascribed to the aggregation of SNIM molecules induced by π–π stacking of nonpolar 1,8-naphthalimide moieties in the presence of water. The low LOD of SNIM towards water presence in ethanol indicates that it can be used as a low-cost reagent for the detection of traces of water in alcohol. The required volume of water to reach saturation of the fluorescence response of SNIM in the ethanol solution was found to be ≈24% (v/v) (Figure S7).
Moreover, SNIM exhibited the ability to investigate the contamination of water in DMF, as a representative for polar aprotic solvents, by its fluorescence emission, Figure 4. Similar to ethanol, the presence of DMF decreased the emission of SNIM in water due to the dissociation of aggregated molecules by DMF solvation. The limit of detecting DMF contamination was found to be 0.08%, refereeing to the applicability of SNIM to detect traces of DMF in water. The saturation of emission response was reached after the addition of 5% of DMF to the water solution, after which the decrease in fluorescence with increasing DMF content up to 10% is negligible (Figure 4B).
Moreover, the effect of dioxane, as a representative of nonpolar solvents, on the emission of a SNIM solution in water has also been investigated (Figure 5). In this case, the emission is quenched by the presence of dioxane traces due to the dissociation of π–π stacking between 1,8-naphthalimide moieties. The LOD and dioxane volume required to reach saturation was found to be 0.05% and 10%, respectively. Moreover, the influence of water presence on the emission of SNIM solution in dioxane has been investigated. Contrarily, the presence of water traces enhanced the fluorescence emission. The limit of detection of water in dioxane was found to be 0.14%. Hence, SNIM has a dual sensitive sensory applicability for investigating the purity of both water and dioxane in the presence of the other as a contaminant. In other words, SNIM is able to detect the presence of dioxane traces in a water sample and water traces in a dioxane sample.

3.4. Solvatochromism of Dendrimer SNID

The effect of water traces on the emission of dendrimer solution was examined in ethanol solution. As shown in Figure 6, water leads to emissions enhancement at both 395 nm and 470 nm, and the limits of detection were found to be 0.5% and 1%, respectively. The fluorescence enhancement at 395 nm was observed till 50% water fraction; after that, the emission quenched by further water addition, Figure 7, due to the higher rate of excimer formation and to the fact that more 1,8-naphthalimides unites become included in the excimer formation. In concomitance, the emission at 470 nm increased slowly till 50 % water fraction, then further addition of water increased the rate. Behaviour of the dendrimer in the presence of both water and ethanol solutions as inputs and the emission at 395 nm (λex. = 340 nm) as output and using the initial case of 50% water fraction mimics XNOR logic gate, Figure 7C, where at the initial state (water coded as 0 and ethanol as 0), the output is high (coded as 1). Addition of ethanol till water fraction = 20% (ethanol coded as 1 and water coded as 0) gets the emission at 395 nm low (coded as 0). Moreover, the addition of water till it reaches a water fraction of 80 % (ethanol coded as 0 and water coded as 1) gets the emission low and coded as 0. Finally, the addition of both ethanol and water in equal amounts (both coded as 1) retains the initial state (emission gets high and coded as 1). On the other hand, using the emission at 470 nm as output and the emission threshold shown in Figure 7B, SNID mimics INHIBIT logic gate where the emission can be considered high (coded as 1) only in the case of adding water alone and otherwise the emission is low (coded as 0). Moreover, a combination of XNOR and INHIBIT logic gates works as a digital comparator, Figure 7D.
Furthermore, the applicability of the dendrimer SNID for detecting DMF contamination in water has been studied, Figure 8. The addition of DMF traces to SNID solution in water was associated with quenching the emissions at 395 nm and 470. The limits of detection were found to be 0.09% and 0.2% using emissions at 395 nm and 470 nm, respectively. The quenching of the emissions by DMF contamination is linear in the range of 0–1% of a DMF fraction. On the other hand, the emission spectrum of SNID solution in DMF was affected only by large volumes of water, Figure 9, due to the good solvation of DMF to dendrimer molecules.
Moreover, the applicability of SNID for detecting dioxane contamination in water samples has been investigated. The presence of dioxane traces quenched both the emissions at 395 and 470 nm linearly in the range of 0–2%. The LOD values were found to be 0.3% and 0.7% using emissions at 395 nm and 470 nm, respectively, Figure 10. On the other hand, the addition of water to SNID solution in dioxane is associated with enhancing the emissions at 395 nm and 470 nm, like the case of adding water to SNID solution in ethanol, Figure 11. Hence, SNID can act as a digital comparator using water and dioxane as inputs and the emissions at 395 nm and 470 nm as outputs.

4. Conclusions

This work presents the synthesis of a new water-soluble poly(propylene amine) dendrimer from the first generation, modified with 4-sulfo-1,8-naphthalimide SNID and its monomer analog SNIM for detecting water contamination by different organic solvents. Both the monomer and dendrimer aggregate in the aqueous solution because of the π-π stacking of 4-sulfo-1,8-naphthalimide moieties that allows the formation of excimers between the excited and non-excited 4-sulfo-1,8-naphthalimide fragments of dendrimer molecules. Moreover, the incorporation of 4-sulfo-1,8-naphthalimide units into the dendrimer scaffold improves their tolerance towards strong bases. Furthermore, the dependence of the emissions, caused by the aggregation and excimer formations, on water presence enables these molecules to detect the presence of traces of various organic solvents in water and vice versa. It has been shown that the dendrimer SNID mimics both XNOR and INHIBIT logic gates which work in combination to execute the function of the digital comparator.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/s23115268/s1; Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in theonline version. Figure S1. 1H-NMR of the monomer SNIM. Figure S2. 13C-NMR of the monomer SNIM. Figure S3. FTIR spectrum of the monomer SNIM. Figure S4. 1H-NMR spectrum of the dendrimer SNID. Figure S5. 13C-NMR spectrum of the dendrimer SNID. Figure S6. FTIR spectrum of the dendrimer SNID. Figure S7. Influence of water on (A) emission spectrum and (B) emission at 395 nm of SNIM solution in ethanol, c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.

Author Contributions

I.G.: methodology, conceptualization, writing—original draft, supervision; D.S.: investigation, methodology, visualization writing—review and editing; visualization; A.I.S.: conceptualization, writing—original draft, investigation, visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Grant № KΠ-06-H49/2 from the National Science Fund, Ministry of Education and Science of Bulgaria. Part of this study is funded by the European Union Next Generation EU, through the National Recovery and Sustainability Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, Project No. BG-RRP-2.004-0008-C01.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge the Ministry of Higher Education of Egypt for the fullscholarship granted to Awad I. Said.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Inoue, K. Functional dendrimers, hyperbranched and star polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2000, 25, 453–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Buhleier, E.; Wehner, W.; Vögtle, F. “Cascade” and “Nonskid-Chain-like” Syntheses of Molecular Cavity Topologies. Synthesis 1978, 2, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tomalia, D.A.; Barker, H.; Dewald, J.R.; Hall, M.; Kallos, G.; Martin, S.; Roeck, J.; Ryder, J.; Smith, P. A New Class of Polymers: Starburst-Dendritic Macromolecules. Polym. J. 1985, 17, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tomalia, D.A.; Barker, H.; Dewald, J.R.; Hall, M.; Kallos, G.; Martin, S.; Roeck, J.; Ryder, J.; Smith, P. Dendritic macromolecules: Synthesis of starburst dendrimers. Macromolecules 1986, 19, 2466–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tomalia, D.A. Birth of a new macromolecular architecture: Dendrimers as quantized building blocks for nanoscale synthetic polymer chemistry. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2005, 30, 294–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cuadrado, I.; Morán, M.; Casado, C.M.; Alonso, B.; Losada, J. Organometallic den-drimers with transition metals. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1999, 193–195, 395–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Madaan, K.; Kumar, S.; Poonia, N.; Lather, V.; Pandita, D. Dendrimers in drug delivery and targeting: Drug-dendrimer interactions and toxicity issues. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2014, 6, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Joshi, N.; Grinstaff, M. Applications of dendrimers in tissue engineering. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2008, 8, 1225–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, K.; Xu, Z.; Yin, M. Perylenediimide-cored dendrimers and their bioimaging and gene delivery applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 46, 25–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ouali, A.; Laurent, R.; Turrin, C.-O.; Majoral, J.-P. Coordination chemistry with phosphorus dendrimers. Applications as catalysts, for materials, and in biology. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 308, 478–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wolinsky, J.B.; Grinstaff, M.W. Therapeutic and diagnostic applications of dendrimers for cancer treatment. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 1037–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Balzani, V.; Ceroni, P.; Maestri, M.; Vichinelli, V. Light-harvesting dendrimers. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Balzaniw, V.; Belgamini, G.; Ceroni, P.; Wogle, F. Electronic spectroscopy of metal complexes with dendritic ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007, 251, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bargossi, C.; Fiorni, M.C.; Montalti, M.; Prodi, L.; Zaccheroni, N. Recent developments in transition metal ion detection by luminescent chemosensors. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 208, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Balzani, V.; Ceroni, P.; Gestermann, S.; Kauffmann, C.; Gorka, M.; Vögtle, F. Dendrimers as fluorescent sensors with signal amplification. Chem. Commun. 2000, 853–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vögtle, F.; Gestermann, S.; Kauffmann, C.; Ceroni, P.; Vicinelli, V.; De Cola, L.; Balzani, V. Poly(Propylene Amine) Dendrimers with Peripheral Dansyl Units:  Protonation, Absorption Spectra, Photophysical Properties, Intradendrimer Quenching, and Sensitization Processes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 12161–12166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, C.; Han, L.; Bai, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Ma, H. Synthesis and branching structure detection of long-subchain hyperbranched polymers via pyrene-labelled methodology. Polymer 2022, 240, 124479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tsuda, K.; Dol, G.C.; Gensch, T.; Hofkens, J.; Latterini, L.; Weener, J.W.; Meijer, E.W.; De Schryver, F.C. Fluorescence from Azobenzene Functionalized Poly(propylene imine) Dendrimers in Self-Assembled Supramolecular Structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3445–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pashaei-Sarnaghi, R.; Najafi, F.; Taghavi-Kahagh, A.; Salami-Kalajahi, M.; Roghani-Mamaqani, H. Synthesis, photocross linking, and self-assembly of coumarin-anchored poly(amidoamine) dendrimer for smart drug delivery system. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 158, 110686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Adronov, A.; Gilat, S.L.; Frechet, J.M.J.; Ohta, K.; Neuwahl, F.V.R.; Fleming, G.R. Light Harvesting and Energy Transfer in Laser−Dye-Labeled Poly(aryl ether) Dendrimers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1175–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grabchev, I.; Qian, X.; Bojinov, V.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, W. Synthesis and photophysical properties of 1,8-naphthalimide-labelled PAMAM as PET sensors of protons and of transition metal ions. Polymer 2002, 43, 5731–5736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Grabchev, I.; Chovelon, J.-M.; Qian, X. A polyamidoamine dendrimer with peripheral 1,8-naphthalimide groups capable of acting as a PET fluorescent sensor for metal cations. New J. Chem. 2003, 27, 337–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Grabchev, I.; Soumillion, J.-P.; Muls, B.; Ivanova, G. Poly(amidoamine) dendrimer peripherally modified with 4-N,N-dimethylaminoethyleneamino-1,8-naphthalimide as a sensor of metal cations and protons. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2004, 3, 1032–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sali, S.; Grabchev, I.; Chovelov, J.-M.; Ivanova, G. Selective sensors for Zn2+ cations based on new green fluorescent poly(amidoamine) dendrimers peripherally modified with 1,8-naphthalimides. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2006, 65, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Grabchev, I.; Staneva, D.; Betcheva, R. Sensor activity, photodegradation and photostabilisation of a PAMAM dendrimer comprising 1,8-naphthalimide functional groups in its periphery. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2006, 91, 2257–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Grabchev, I.; Chovelon, J.-M.; Nedelcheva, A. Green fluorescence poly(amidoamine) dendrimer functionalized with 1,8-naphthalimide units as potential sensor for metal cations. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2006, 183, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Staneva, D.; Angelova, S.; Vasileva-Tonkova, E.; Grozdanov, P.; Nikolova, I.; Grabchev, I. Synthesis, photophysical characterisation and antimicrobial activity of a new anionic PAMAM dendrimer. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2020, 403, 112878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Manov, H.; Staneva, D.; Vasileva-Tonkova, E.; Alexandrova, R.; Stoyanova, R.; Kukeva, R.; Stoyanov, S.; Grabchev, I. A New Cu(II) Complex of PAMAM Dendrimer Modified with 1,8-Naphthalimide: Antibacterial and Anticancer Activity. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2022, 12, 5534–5547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Canonico, B.; Cangiotti, M.; Montanari, M.; Papa, S.; Fusi, V.; Giorgi, L.; Ciacci, C.; Ottaviani, M.F.; Staneva, D.; Grabchev, I. Characterization of a fluorescent 1,8-naphthalimide-functionalized PAMAM dendrimer and its Cu(ii) complexes as cytotoxic drugs: EPR and biological studies in myeloid tumor cells. Biol. Chem. 2022, 403, 345–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Staneva, D.; Manov, H.; Vasileva-Tonkova, E.; Kukeva, R.; Stoyanova, R.; Grabchev, I. Enhancing the antibacterial activity of PAMAM dendrimer modified with 1,8-naphthalimides and its copper complex via light illumination. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2022, 33, 3163–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Grabchev, I.; Bosch, P.; McKenna, M.; Staneva, D. A new colorimetric and fluorimetric sensor for metal cations based on poly(propylene amine) dendrimer modified with 1,8-naphthalimide. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2008, 201, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Grabchev, I.; Bosch, P.; McKenna, M.; Nedelcheva, A. Synthesis and spectral properties of new green fluorescent poly(propyleneimine) dendrimers modified with 1,8-naphthalimide as sensors for metal cations. Polymer 2007, 48, 6755–6762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Grabchev, I.; Dumas, S.; Chovelon, J.-M.; Nedelcheva, A. First generation poly(propyleneimine) dendrimers functionalised with 1,8-naphthalimide units as fluorescence sensors for metal cations and protons. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 2113–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Staneva, D.; Manov, H.; Yordanova, S.; Stoyanov, S.; Grabchev, I. Synthesis, spectral properties and antimicrobial activity of a new cationic water-soluble pH-dependent poly(propylene imine) dendrimer modified with 1,8-naphthalimides. Luminescence 2020, 35, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, L.; Yang, W.; Xu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, A. A highly selective and sensitive Fe3+ fluorescent sensor by assembling three 1, 8-naphthalimide fluorophores with a tris(aminoethylamine) ligand. Dyes Pigm. 2013, 97, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dodangeh, M.; Gharanjig, K.; Arami, M. A novel Ag+ cation sensor based on polyamidoamine dendrimer modified with 1, 8-naphthalimide derivatives. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2016, 154, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Said, A.; Georgiev, N.; Bojinov, V. Synthesis of a single 1,8-naphthalimide fluorophore as a molecular logic lab for simultaneously detecting of Fe3+, Hg2+ and Cu2+. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 196, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Said, A.; Georgiev, N.; Bojinov, V. A fluorescent bichromophoric “off-on-off” pH probe as a molecular logic device (half-subtractor and digital comparator) operating by controlled PET and ICT processes. Dyes Pigm. 2019, 162, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Staneva, D.; Said, A.I.; Vasileva-Tonkova, E.; Grabchev, I. Enhanced Photodynamic Efficacy Using 1,8-Naphthalimides: Potential Application in Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy. Molecules 2022, 27, 5743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Balasaravanan, R.; Sadhasivam, V.; Sivaraman, G.; Siva, A. Triphenylamino α-Cyanovinyl-and cyanoaryl-based fluorophores: Solvatochromism, aggregation-induced emission and electrochemical properties. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2016, 5, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jiang, S.; Qiu, J.; Chen, Y.; Guo, H.; Yang, F. Luminescent columnar liquid crystals based on AIE tetraphenylethylene with hydrazone groups bearing multiple alkyl chains. Dyes Pigm. 2018, 159, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, W.W.; Zhao, Z.; Cai, Y.; Xu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Kwok, R.T.K.; Chen, Y.; Leung, N.L.C.; Ma, D.; et al. Facile access to deep red/near-infrared emissive AIEgens for efficient non-doped OLEDs. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 6118–6125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jiang, S.; Qiu, J.; Lin, L.; Guo, H.; Yang, F. Circularly polarized luminescence based on columnar self-assembly of tetraphenylethylene with multiple cholesterol units. Dyes Pigm. 2019, 163, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qiu, J.; Jiang, S.; Lin, B.; Guo, H.; Yang, F. An unusual AIE fluorescent sensor for sequentially detecting Co2+-Hg2+-Cu2+ based on diphenylacrylonitrile Schiff-base derivative. Dyes Pigm. 2019, 170, 107590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Birks, J.; Dyson, D.; Munro, I. ’Excimer’ fluorescence II. Lifetime studies of pyrene solutions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 1963, 275, 575–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Winnik, F.M. Photophysics of preassociated pyrenes in aqueous polymer solutions and in other organized media. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 587–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ghosh, A.; Sengupta, A.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Das, D. Lysine triggered ratiometric conversion of dynamic to static excimer of a pyrene derivative: Aggregation-induced emission, nanomolar detection and human breast cancer cell (MCF7) imaging. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 11455–11458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Haedler, A.T.; Misslitz, H.; Buehlmeyer, C.; Albuquerque, R.Q.; Köhler, A.; Schmidt, H. Controlling the π-Stacking Behavior of Pyrene Derivatives: Influence of H-Bonding and Steric Effects in Different States of Aggregation. ChemPhysChem 2013, 14, 1818–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, J.; Lin, C.; Hwang, C. Cu2+-Induced Blue Shift of the Pyrene Excimer Emission:  A New Signal Transduction Mode of Pyrene Probes. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 889–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dabestani, R.; Kidder, M.; Buchanan, A.C. Pore Size Effect on the Dynamics of Excimer Formation for Chemically Attached Pyrene on Various Silica Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem C 2008, 112, 11468–11475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jung, H.S.; Verwilst, P.; Kim, W.Y.; Kim, J.S. Fluorescent and colorimetric sensors for the detection of humidity or water content. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 1242–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Que, E.L.; Domaille, D.W.; Chang, C.J. Metals in ueurobiology: Probing their chemistry and biology with molecular imaging. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1517–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, Q.; Li, X.I.; Wang, L.; Cheng, Y.; Xie, G. Effect of water content on the kinetics of p-xylene liquid-phase catalytic oxidation to terephthalic acid. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 4518–4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Williams, D.B.G.; Lawton, M. Drying of organic solvents: Quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of several desiccants. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 8351–8354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liang, Y.Y. Automation of Karl Fischer water titration by flow injection sampling. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 2504–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Oguchi, R.; Yamaguchi, K.; Shibamoto, T. Determination of water content in common organic solvents by a gas chromatograph equipped with a megabore fused-silica column and a thermal conductivity detector. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1988, 26, 588–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sun, H.; Wang, B.; DiMagno, S.G. A method for detecting water in organic solvents. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4413–4416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Enoki, T.; Ooyama, Y. Colorimetric and ratiometric fluorescence sensing of water based on 9-methyl pyrido[3,4-b]indole-boron trifluoride complex. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 2086–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kumar, P.; Ghosh, A.; Jose, D.A. A simple colorimetric sensor for the detection of moisture in organic solvents and building materials: Applications in rewritable paper and fingerprint imaging. Analyst 2019, 144, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nootem, J.; Sattayanon, C.; Namuangruk, S.; Rashatasakhon, P.; Wattanathana, W.; Tumcharern, G.; Chansaenpak, K. Solvatochromic triazaborolopyridinium probes toward ultra-sensitive trace water detection in organic solvents. Dyes Pigm. 2020, 181, 108554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Guliyev, R.; Ozturk, S.; Kostereli, Z.; Akkaya, E. From virtual to physical: Integration of chemical logic gates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 9826–9831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Li, W.-T.; Wu, G.-Y.; Qu, W.-J.; Li, Q.; Lou, J.-C.; Lin, Q.; Yao, H.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Wei, T.-B. A colorimetric and reversible fluorescent chemosensor for Ag+ in aqueous solution and its application in IMPLICATION logic gate. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 239, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Said, A.; Georgiev, N.; Bojinov, V. A smart chemosensor: Discriminative multidetection and various logic operations in aqueous solution at biological pH. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2019, 223, 117304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Said, A.; Georgiev, N.; Bojinov, V. Sensor activity and logic behavior of dihydroxyphenylhydrazone derivative as a chemosensor for Cu2+ determination in alkaline aqueous solutions. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2015, 311, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Arabahmadi, R.; Orojloo, M.; Amani, S. Three and four inputs combinational logic circuits based on a azo-azomethine chemosensor for the detection of Ni2+ and CN−/OAC− ions: Experimental and DFT studies. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2023, 434, 114231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Said, A.; Georgiev, N.; Bojinov, V. Low Molecular Weight Probe for Selective Sensing of PH and Cu2+ Working as Three INHIBIT Based Digital Comparator. J. Fluoresc. 2022, 32, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Said, A.I.; Georgiev, N.I.; Bojinov, V.B. A novel dual naked eye colorimetric and fluorescent pH chemosensor and its ability to execute three INHIBIT based digital comparator. Dyes Pigm. 2022, 205, 110489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Said, A.I.; Georgiev, N.I.; Hamdan, S.A.; Bojinov, V.B. A chemosensoring molecular lab for various analytes and its ability to execute a molecular logical digital comparator. J. Fluoresc. 2019, 29, 1431–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Arabahmadi, R. Antipyrine-based Schiff base as fluorogenic chemosensor for recognition of Zn2+, Cu2+ and H2PO4− in aqueous media by comparator, half subtractor and integrated logic circuits. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2022, 426, 113762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Grabchev, I.; Staneva, D.; Betcheva, R. Fluorescent dendrimers as sensors for biologically important metal cations. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 29, 4976–4983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, B.-B.; Zhang, X.; Jia, X.-R.; Li, Z.-C.; Ji, Y.; Yang, L.; Wei, Y. Fluorescence and Aggregation Behavior of Poly (Amidoamine) Dendrimers Peripherally Modified with Aromatic Chromophores: The Effect of Dendritic Architectures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15180–15194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sensors 23 05268 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of SNIM and SNID.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of SNIM and SNID.
Sensors 23 05268 sch001
Sensors 23 05268 g001 550
Figure 1. Influence of solvents on the absorption spectrum of (A) SNIM, c = 10−5 M and (B) SNID, c = 5 × 10−6 M.
Figure 1. Influence of solvents on the absorption spectrum of (A) SNIM, c = 10−5 M and (B) SNID, c = 5 × 10−6 M.
Sensors 23 05268 g001
Sensors 23 05268 g002a 550Sensors 23 05268 g002b 550
Figure 2. Influence of solvents on the emission spectra of (A) SNIM, c = 10−5 M; (B) SNID, c = 5 × 10−6 M after excitation at 340 nm. Photograph of SNIM and SNID in a solution of water (1), DMF (2), and ethanol (3) under monochromatic UV light irradiation at 366 nm (C).
Figure 2. Influence of solvents on the emission spectra of (A) SNIM, c = 10−5 M; (B) SNID, c = 5 × 10−6 M after excitation at 340 nm. Photograph of SNIM and SNID in a solution of water (1), DMF (2), and ethanol (3) under monochromatic UV light irradiation at 366 nm (C).
Sensors 23 05268 g002aSensors 23 05268 g002b
Sensors 23 05268 g003a 550Sensors 23 05268 g003b 550
Figure 3. Influence of ethanol content on (A) the emission spectrum of water solution of SNIM, (B) its emission at 395 nm. Influence of water content on (C) the emission spectrum of SNIM solution in ethanol and (D) its emission at 395 nm. c = 10−5 M excitation at 340 nm.
Figure 3. Influence of ethanol content on (A) the emission spectrum of water solution of SNIM, (B) its emission at 395 nm. Influence of water content on (C) the emission spectrum of SNIM solution in ethanol and (D) its emission at 395 nm. c = 10−5 M excitation at 340 nm.
Sensors 23 05268 g003aSensors 23 05268 g003b
Sensors 23 05268 g004 550
Figure 4. Influence of DMF content on (A) the emission spectrum; (B) emission at 395 nm of SNIM solution in water, c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Figure 4. Influence of DMF content on (A) the emission spectrum; (B) emission at 395 nm of SNIM solution in water, c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Sensors 23 05268 g004
Sensors 23 05268 g005 550
Figure 5. Influence of dioxane content on (A) the emission spectrum and (B) the emission at 395 nm of SNIM solution in water. Influence of water content on (C) the emission spectrum and (D) the emission at 395 nm of SNIM solution in dioxane, c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Figure 5. Influence of dioxane content on (A) the emission spectrum and (B) the emission at 395 nm of SNIM solution in water. Influence of water content on (C) the emission spectrum and (D) the emission at 395 nm of SNIM solution in dioxane, c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Sensors 23 05268 g005
Sensors 23 05268 g006 550
Figure 6. Influence of water content (0–10%, v/v) on (A) the emission spectrum, (B) the emissions at 395 nm, and (C) the emission at 470 nm of SNID solution in ethanol. c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Figure 6. Influence of water content (0–10%, v/v) on (A) the emission spectrum, (B) the emissions at 395 nm, and (C) the emission at 470 nm of SNID solution in ethanol. c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Sensors 23 05268 g006
Sensors 23 05268 g007 550
Figure 7. Influence of water content (0–100%, v/v) on (A) the emission spectrum of SNID solution in ethanol, (B) the emissions at 395 nm and 470 nm and their function as outputs in mimicking logic gates. (C) Truth table for SNID using water and ethanol as inputs. (D) Electronic representation of digital comparator executed by SNID. c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Figure 7. Influence of water content (0–100%, v/v) on (A) the emission spectrum of SNID solution in ethanol, (B) the emissions at 395 nm and 470 nm and their function as outputs in mimicking logic gates. (C) Truth table for SNID using water and ethanol as inputs. (D) Electronic representation of digital comparator executed by SNID. c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Sensors 23 05268 g007
Sensors 23 05268 g008 550
Figure 8. Influence of DMF content on (A) the emission spectrum, (B) the emission at 395 nm, and (C) the emission at 470 nm of SNID solution in water. c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Figure 8. Influence of DMF content on (A) the emission spectrum, (B) the emission at 395 nm, and (C) the emission at 470 nm of SNID solution in water. c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Sensors 23 05268 g008
Sensors 23 05268 g009a 550Sensors 23 05268 g009b 550
Figure 9. Influence of the water content on (A) the emission spectrum, (B) the emissions at 395 nm, and (C) the emission at 470 nm of SNID solution in DMF. c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Figure 9. Influence of the water content on (A) the emission spectrum, (B) the emissions at 395 nm, and (C) the emission at 470 nm of SNID solution in DMF. c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Sensors 23 05268 g009aSensors 23 05268 g009b
Sensors 23 05268 g010 550
Figure 10. Influence of dioxane content on (A) the emission spectrum, (B) the emissions at 395 nm, and (C) the emission at 470 nm of SNID solution in water. c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Figure 10. Influence of dioxane content on (A) the emission spectrum, (B) the emissions at 395 nm, and (C) the emission at 470 nm of SNID solution in water. c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Sensors 23 05268 g010
Sensors 23 05268 g011 550
Figure 11. Influence of water content on (A) the emission spectrum, (B) the emissions at 395 nm, and (C) the emission at 470 nm as outputs for XNOR and INHIBIT logic gates (insert) of SNID solution in dioxane. c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Figure 11. Influence of water content on (A) the emission spectrum, (B) the emissions at 395 nm, and (C) the emission at 470 nm as outputs for XNOR and INHIBIT logic gates (insert) of SNID solution in dioxane. c = 10−5 M, excitation at 340 nm.
Sensors 23 05268 g011
Table
Table 1. Wavelength of absorption, wavelength of emission, Stocks shifts, absorption extinction coefficient, and quantum yields of the SNIM and SNID in different solvents using Anthracene (ΦF = 0.29 in ethanol) as a reference.
Table 1. Wavelength of absorption, wavelength of emission, Stocks shifts, absorption extinction coefficient, and quantum yields of the SNIM and SNID in different solvents using Anthracene (ΦF = 0.29 in ethanol) as a reference.
SolventsWaterDMSODMFEthanolDCMTHFDioxane
SNIM
   Dielectric constant (25 °C)78.3547.137.124.58.937.582.25
  λabs.(nm)339, 350328, 342, 358328, 341, 357327, 337, 354326, 338, 354325, 339, 355323, 336, 353
  λem. (nm)393389380387387405367
  Stockes shift (cm−1)3126222616952409240934781081
  ε (l mol−1cm−1) 11,300
11,100		9100
12,400
11,000		8900
12,300
11,000		9200
11,700
10,500		8200
10,500
9300		9100
11,600
10,500		6900
9300
8600
  ΦF0.237 a0.0040.0010.0050.0070.0170.005
SNID
  λabs. (nm)342327, 342, 357326, 341, 357326, 338, 354324, 338, 354325, 338, 354324, 338, 354
  λem. (nm)393,474387379388-404378
  (cm−1)8143217116262475-34961794
  ε (l mol−1cm−1)47,80055,300
73,600
64,500		52,300
71,000
63,200		42,500
52,900
46,100		42,300
48,600
40,400		48,200
55,300
44,100		45,500
54,500
45,300
  ΦF0.132 a0.0010.0010.0035-0.00830.0036
a Quinine H sulfate (0.54, water) as a reference.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Said, A.I.; Staneva, D.; Grabchev, I. New Water-Soluble Poly(propylene imine) Dendrimer Modified with 4-Sulfo-1,8-naphthalimide Units: Sensing Properties and Logic Gates Mimicking. Sensors 2023, 23, 5268. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115268

AMA Style

Said AI, Staneva D, Grabchev I. New Water-Soluble Poly(propylene imine) Dendrimer Modified with 4-Sulfo-1,8-naphthalimide Units: Sensing Properties and Logic Gates Mimicking. Sensors. 2023; 23(11):5268. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115268

Chicago/Turabian Style

Said, Awad I., Desislava Staneva, and Ivo Grabchev. 2023. "New Water-Soluble Poly(propylene imine) Dendrimer Modified with 4-Sulfo-1,8-naphthalimide Units: Sensing Properties and Logic Gates Mimicking" Sensors 23, no. 11: 5268. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115268

APA Style

Said, A. I., Staneva, D., & Grabchev, I. (2023). New Water-Soluble Poly(propylene imine) Dendrimer Modified with 4-Sulfo-1,8-naphthalimide Units: Sensing Properties and Logic Gates Mimicking. Sensors, 23(11), 5268. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115268

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop