Next Article in Journal
Different Directions of Effects of Polyclonal IgG Antibodies from Patients with Schizophrenia and Healthy Individuals on Cell Death In Vitro: A Pilot Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Antioxidant Flavonoid Diosmetin Is Cardioprotective in a Rat Model of Myocardial Infarction Induced by Beta 1-Adrenergic Receptors Activation
Previous Article in Journal
Perspective for Studying the Relationship of miRNAs with Transposable Elements
Previous Article in Special Issue
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) Haplotypes in Healthy Subjects from Worldwide Macroareas: A Population Genetics Perspective for Cardiovascular Disease, Neurodegeneration, and Dementia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Link between Magnesium Supplements and Statin Medication in Dyslipidemic Patients

by
Roxana Nartea
1,2,
Brindusa Ilinca Mitoiu
1,3,* and
Ioana Ghiorghiu
1,2
1
Clinical Department 9, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
2
National Institute for Rehabilitation, Physical Medicine and Balneoclimatology, 030079 Bucharest, Romania
3
Agrippa Ionescu Clinical Emergency Hospital, 077016 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45(4), 3146-3167; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45040205
Submission received: 27 February 2023 / Revised: 15 March 2023 / Accepted: 16 March 2023 / Published: 5 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Focus on Molecular Basis of Cardiac Diseases)

Abstract

:
Many investigations have discovered a connection between statins and magnesium supplements. On one hand, increasing research suggests that chronic hypomagnesemia may be an important factor in the etiology of some metabolic illnesses, including obesity and overweight, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, alterations in lipid metabolism, and low-grade inflammation. Chronic metabolic problems seem to be prevented by a high Mg intake combined with diet and/or supplements. On the other hand, it is known that statins lower the frequency of cardiac events, stroke, and mortality, not by lowering LDL-C, but by the capacity to reduce mevalonate formation. That will enhance endothelial function, inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration and encourage macrophages to promote plaque stability and regression while reducing inflammation. Taking these factors into consideration, we did an extensive analysis of the relevant literature, comparing the effects of Mg2 and statin medications on lipoproteins and, implicitly, on the key enzymes involved in cholesterol metabolism.

1. Introduction

Dyslipidemia, an important factor in defining metabolic syndrome (MetS), represents a worldwide challenge, due to the increased risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) [1]. Dyslipidemia is characterized by elevated levels of total cholesterol and/or triglycerides, with decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. Elevated levels of LDL (low-density lipoprotein) and VLDL (very low-density lipoprotein-density) can be also observed.
The progression to atherosclerosis depends on the vascular endothelial metabolism (Kruppel-like factor 2 expression) and LDL serum level (above 20–40 mg/dL) [2,3,4].
Statins are the main treatment for LDL cholesterol reduction because they demonstrably lower cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (according to International Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia 2022), in cases of high-risk conditions, such as clinical atherosclerosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease (age ≥50 years), and patients with LDL-C ≥ 5.0 mmol/L. However, many studies highlight a series of adverse reactions and/or rather modest results in reducing the level of LDL cholesterol and indirectly reducing dyslipidemia, after statin administration [5,6].
There are several factors involved in abnormal lipid profiles such as genetic background, a Western-style diet, alcohol abuse, being overweight or obese, insulin resistance, or some chronic conditions, such as nephrotic syndrome [6,7,8,9,10]. Recent studies suggest that serum magnesium levels can be associated with lipid abnormalities (Table S1, see Supplementary Materials). As epidemiological research is refined by the description of the biological and pathophysiological mechanisms, the goal of this study is to summarize the current understanding of the pathological relationships between dyslipidemia, statin use, and serum magnesium levels.
It is not just theoretically interesting to learn about the connections between dyslipidemia and serum magnesium levels. Magnesium, through its action on lecithin–cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT), can improve the metabolism of lipoproteins, and implicitly dyslipidemia [11,12,13,14]. If correctly controlled, interventions like diet, exercise, and magnesium supplementation could be very beneficial and lessen the effect of dyslipidemia on CVD. [14].
Although many studies in the scientific literature present the effects of statin therapy or magnesium supplementation in dyslipidemia, there are rather few articles to discuss the results of a combined treatment.

2. Literature Selection

We conducted a thorough review of the literature and included papers that discussed the role of dietary magnesium intake in the etiology of dyslipidemia and possible interaction with statin medications in our study. The keywords indicated above served as a valuable aid for choosing the appropriate publications, and the information gleaned from those articles helps to paint a complicated picture of the role that hypomagnesemia plays in the development of dyslipidemia and further in metabolic syndrome. As MetS is the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factor (CVRF), knowing the link between oxidative stress, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease (CVD), we expanded the investigation to additional pathological situations.
Using keywords and their combination (i.e., dyslipidemia, magnesium supplements, hypomagnesemia, statins, MetS, lipoproteins; HMG-CoA reductase; LCAT; therapeutic management) were searched in PubMed, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and human clinical trials conducted in English were all included (Figure 1). The information that was not in English and the articles without pertinent findings were eliminated. A thorough investigation was conducted, new hypotheses were added, and a summary of the available data was produced.
Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies for the following purposes: (1) to evaluate the relationship between dietary magnesium consumption and dyslipidemia; (2) to assess the effect of dietary magnesium consumption on the risk of metabolic syndrome and its dose-response pattern; (3) to review the actual knowledge of statin medication, including positive effects and side effects; and (4) to examine the possible connection between Mg supplements and statin intake.

3. General Considerations about the Metabolism of Plasmatic Lipoproteins

The blood transport of cholesterol esters and triglycerides is largely carried out with the help of lipoproteins, complex structures that contain hydrophobic components (triglycerides (TG) and esterified cholesterol (ES)), and, on the outside, have a hydrophilic coating made of phospholipids, free cholesterol, and proteins called apolipoproteins (Apo) (Table S1). There are five types of apoproteins (A, B, C, D, and E), some of which contain several subtypes [13]. Apoproteins contribute to the solubilization of LP particles in the aqueous plasma environment; they are activators of some enzymes involved in the lipoprotein (LP) metabolism (the lipoprotein lipase is activated by apo C-II and apo A-I activates LCAT) and are ligands for receptors involved in the cellular uptake of LP (apo B-100 is the ligand for the LDL receptor; apo E is the ligand for the uptake of remnant chylomicrons and IDL) [14,15]. In conclusion, apolipoproteins serve four main purposes: they are structural; they bind to lipoprotein receptors; they direct the synthesis of lipoproteins; and they either activate or inhibit the enzymes responsible for the metabolism of lipoproteins, as can be seen below in Table 1, a summary of the functions of the main apolipoproteins. Therefore, apolipoproteins are essential for the metabolism of lipoproteins.
Increased values of LDL cholesterol cause saturation of all the cells with cholesterol and a decreased number of receptors for LDL on the membrane (due to the phenomenon of downregulation). As a result, LDL particles persist longer in the plasma; some undergo oxidation by free radicals, resulting in oxidized LDL, which is no longer recognized by LDL receptors on the surface of hepatocytes and extrahepatic tissue cells [19]. Excess LDL and oxidized LDL will be captured by low-affinity scavenger receptors on the surface of monocytes/macrophages, receptors that are not regulated by the intracellular cholesterol content (they do not undergo the “downregulation” phenomenon) [17,18,19]. As a result, these cells are loaded with large amounts of cholesterol esters, turning into “foam cells” [22,23,24]. These cells accumulate in the arterial subendothelial space, where they initiate and maintain an inflammatory focus by attracting new monocytes and other inflammatory cells (lymphocytes) [24,25]. Migration into the subendothelial space and proliferation of smooth muscle cells in the medium wall of the arterial wall also occur. All these changes lead to the formation of the atheroma plaque, which has a lipid core and inflammatory cells inside, as well as areas of micro-thrombosis, and is covered with fibrous tissue on the outside [25,26,27]. Over time, this plaque causes the vascular wall to stiffen and the lumen to narrow, with decreased blood flow through the respective vessels (ischemia) and reduced oxygenation of the tissues irrigated by these vessels (tissue hypoxia) [20,23,25]. Under certain conditions, the fibrous hood of the plaque can break, and the contact of certain components inside the plaque with the plasma coagulation factors initiates the coagulation process, with the formation of a thrombus [25]. When the thrombus completely blocks the vascular lumen, the complete cessation of oxygen supply causes necrosis of the tissue irrigated by the respective vessel, a situation called infarction (depending on the location, it can be myocardial, cerebral, mesenteric infarction, etc.) [26,27,28].
Nascent HDLs (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) have an enzyme produced by the liver called LCAT (lecithin–cholesterol acyl transferase) attached to their surface [28]. This enzyme, activated by its cofactor, apo A-I, catalyzes the esterification of cholesterol with a fatty acid transferred from the C-2 of lecithin [29,30,31] (Figure 2).
As can be seen in Figure 2, the resulting esterified cholesterol is entirely non-polar and migrates towards HDL in the center, forming a hydrophobic core → the HDL particle is changed and called HDL3 or mature HDL. As a result of the action of LCAT, the cholesterol content of the surface layer of HDL decreases [26,29,30,31]. As a result, HDL particles will be able to extract and remove excess cholesterol from extrahepatic tissues [29]. This transfer of cholesterol from tissues to HDL is mediated by a membrane protein called ABCA-1 (ATP-binding cassette transporter-1), which transports cholesterol using the energy resulting from ATP hydrolysis. Cholesterol extracted from tissues is esterified by LCAT and migrates to the core of the HDL particles, so they become larger and less dense and are called HDL2 [29,30,31,32,33,34]. HDL2 particles are transported to the liver, where they bind to receptors called SR-B1 (scavenger receptor class B1). The esterified cholesterol in the core of the particle is selectively taken up in the liver cell, but the HDL particle is not internalized but remains in the blood and becomes HDL3 again (following the decrease in cholesterol content), starting the cycle again. This transport of cholesterol from the extrahepatic tissues to the liver is known as the reverse transport of cholesterol (in the opposite direction to that carried out by LDL particles) [34]. It is particularly beneficial for vascular tissue: HDL reduces the risk of atherosclerotic plaque formation by reducing cholesterol levels in the arterial wall. In summary, the role of HDL particles is to take excess cholesterol from the extrahepatic tissues and transport it to the liver, where it will be eliminated from the body in the form of bile acids [29,34].
The VLDL metabolism is similar to that of chylomicrons. Nascent VLDL initially contains, in addition to lipids, apo B-100 [35,36]. After secretion by hepatocytes into the bloodstream, they receive apo C and apo E from HDL and become mature VLDL [36]. In the capillaries of some extrahepatic tissues, lipoprotein lipase (activated by apo C-II) degrades part of the TG from VLDL, with the resulting fatty acids being mostly captured in the respective tissues to be degraded as an energy source (e.g., in skeletal muscle, myocardium) or stored as TG (in adipose tissue). Subsequently, VLDL donates apo C back to the HDL particles [36,37]. The resulting particles are smaller and denser and are called remnant VLDL or IDL (intermediate-density lipoprotein). Compared to VLDL, IDL contain a smaller amount of TG and proportionally more cholesterol, and, among the apoproteins, they contain apo B-100 and apo E [34,35,36,37,38]. IDL particles have two possibilities of metabolism: on one hand, they are captured in the liver using receptors that recognize apo E on their surface (these are the same receptors that also capture residual chylomicrons (CM), the LDL receptor and LRP); the rest of the IDL particles will turn into LDL particles. In summary, the roles of VLDL particles are to provide fatty acids (synthesized by the liver) to the extrahepatic tissues and to be the precursors of LDL particles [33,39,40,41,42,43,44].
IDL particles that are not captured in the liver will undergo the following changes: (1)they will lose apo E to HDL particles (process mediated by cholesteryl ester transfer protein, CETP, and plasma phospholipid-transfer protein, PLTP); (2) this will be followed by increased PLTP activity (known to be a pro-atherogenic factor) and decreased CETP activity (recognized as a protective factor); (3) in the sinusoid capillaries of the liver, they undergo the action of hepatic lipase, which degrades most of the TG still contained in the IDL [45,46]. The resulting particles are LDL, which are rich in cholesterol (predominantly esterified), and contain very small amounts of TG, and the apoproteins contain only apo B-100. LDL will be taken up partly in the liver and partly in the extrahepatic tissues, via the LDL receptor, which recognizes apo B-100 as a ligand on the surface of LDL particles [37,38,39]. It should be noted that for VLDL to LDL conversions, a change in the spatial conformation of apo B-100 occurs, thus the recognition domain of the LDL receptor is exposed on the surface. As a result, the LDL receptor will be able to capture and internalize the LDL particles, a phenomenon called receptor-mediated endocytosis. (As previously mentioned, the hepatic LDL receptor also captures IDL particles, recognizing apo E on the IDL surface as its ligand; apo B-100 has, in these particles, a spatial conformation that does not allow recognition by the LDL receptor, the receptor binding not being exposed on the surface) [37]. Thus, the LDL receptor recognizes two ligands: apo E (present on the surface of remnant chylomicrons, CM, and intermediate-density lipoprotein, IDL), and apo B-100 on the surface of the LDL [37,38]. For this reason, it is also called the apo B-100/E receptor. A genetic deficiency of this receptor leads to the disease called familial hypercholesterolemia, transmitted autosomal dominantly and having an incidence of about 1:500 individuals in the general population [39,40,41,42]. It is manifested by a marked reduction in the capture of LDL particles, their excess accumulation in the plasma, and a significant increase in the risk of developing atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases [43,44].
LDL receptors in cell membranes bind LDL-forming complexes that pass through the cell by endocytosis to become endosomes. Later, the endosomes fuse with the lysosomes, forming endolysosomes, and the hydrolytic enzymes in the lysosomes degrade the components of the LDL particles: apoprotein B-100 is degraded into amino acids; cholesterol esterase hydrolyzes cholesterol esters to free cholesterol and fatty acids [37]. The LDL receptor is recycled to the plasma membrane to take up new LDL particles from the plasma [45]. The cholesterol reached intracellularly using LDL particles is used by cells to restore cellular and subcellular membranes; in the adrenal cortex and gonads, it is the precursor of steroid hormones, and, in the skin, it is the precursor of vitamin D3 [37,47]. The remaining cholesterol will regulate the intracellular cholesterol homeostasis in the following ways: (1) inhibition of the de novo synthesis of cholesterol in the cell, through the repression of HMG-CoA reductase (the regulatory enzyme of cholesterol synthesis) [34,37]; as a result, a cell receiving cholesterol from the plasma (via LDL) will reduce its local cholesterol synthesis [34,37,42,43,44,45]; (2) reducing the synthesis of new LDL receptors by decreasing the expression (repression) of the gene that codes for this receptor; as a result, the number of LDL receptors on the surface of the cells will decrease, preventing the capture of new LDL particles and thus preventing the overloading of the cell with cholesterol—a phenomenon known as “downregulation”; thus, the LDL receptor is a high-affinity but saturable receptor, the number of these molecules on the cell surface being dependent on the intracellular concentration of cholesterol [37,43,44,45]; (3) any cholesterol remaining that is more than current tissue needs is esterified under the action of an enzyme called ACAT (acyl-CoA cholesterol acyl transferase) and, temporarily, stored in the cytoplasm; ACAT is activated by cholesterol. In conclusion, the role of LDL particles is to transport cholesterol synthesized by the liver (and initially transported by VLDL) to the extrahepatic tissues, ensuring their cholesterol needs [29,37,47,48].
The progression to atherosclerosis, based on increased serum levels of LDL, begins with an altered balance between vasoconstriction and vasodilatation, damaged endothelium followed by increased endothelial permeability, and a cascade in the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines [49,50].

4. Role of Statins in Managing Dyslipidemia

Statins are HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors used in the management of hypercholesterolemia or familial dyslipidemias [51] and for primary or secondary prevention of atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASCVD) [52,53].
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors combined with diet and physical exercise are the common treatment for hypercholesterolemia, by reducing total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglyceride (TG) levels. In the same time, they increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations [52].

4.1. Classification of Statins

Statins are classified based on their intensity or lipophilic or hydrophilic capacity.
The classification based on their intensity includes low-intensity statins (reduce LDL-C by less than 30%), moderate-intensity statins (reduce LDL-C by 30 to 50%), and high-intensity statins (reduce LDL-C by greater than 50%) [54]. The strongest statin is rosuvastatin, followed by pravastatin and atorvastatin in equivalent doses [55].
Statin classification includes lipophilic statins (simvastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin and pitavastatin) and hydrophilic statins (rosuvastatin and pravastatin) [56].
Lipophilic statins are able to pass the membranes and combine acyl chains. Lipophilic statins are distributed in different tissues due to their ability to circulate by passive diffusion. In the end, Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes will metabolize statins. [57].
Hydrophilic agents (pravastatin and rosuvastatin) associated by polarity with the membrane use carriers to enter the cell and to inhibit the HMG-CoA reductase. That type of transportation is specific for the liver and is followed by a low potential of non-LDL effects at other sites. They are mostly eliminated without modification [58].
Statins lower plasma levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, VLDL-C, triglycerides and increase plasmatic levels of HDL-C.
The biosynthesis of cholesterol has a very complex pathway, including the synthesis of mevalonate (MVA), the reduction of isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP), the synthesis of squalene, and the formation of cholesterol via lanosterol [59]. Statins intervene both during the synthesis of mevalonate by inhibiting (HMG-CoA) reductase and during the synthesis of squalene by inhibiting the formation of prenylated proteins (Figure 2).

4.2. Action of Statins on HMG-CoA

HMG-CoA reductase participates in the conversion of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) to mevalonate in the hepatocytes. Statins bind to the active site of HMG-CoA reductase by competition and reduce its activity by inducing conformation changes. Statins have a more important binding affinity for HMG-CoA reductase than the substrate, so the synthesis of cholesterol in the hepatocytes will be reduced [52,58,60,61]. Second, the reduced synthesis of cholesterol will activate the sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBP), followed by increased transcription of the LDL receptor in the hepatocytes. The plasmatic LDL and VLDL will be lowered after binding to the LDL receptors and will be processed by endocytosis in the hepatocytes [62,63].
Statins have also an important intrinsic cardiovascular protective effect, by inhibiting the synthesis of prenylated proteins (especially farnesyl and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate) in the biosynthesis of cholesterol. By inhibiting the synthesis of isoprenoid intermediates, statins reduce the post-translational prenylation of small guanosine triphosphate-binding proteins. The following effectors (Rho kinase, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidases) will be also inhibited. The final result is a decreased proliferation of myocardial fibroblasts and inhibition of collagen proliferation [59,64,65].
The pleiotropic effect is due to four main mechanisms: plaque stabilization (by maintaining the fibrous structure of atherosclerotic plaque, lowering the macrophages, decreasing metalloproteinases of the matrix), reduced inflammation (by lowering the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8), improved endothelial function (vasodilatation followed by better blood circulation due to increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity in the endothelial cells), and decreased thrombogenicity (by lowering the activity of platelets combined to reduced thromboxane A2 synthesis) [66,67,68,69].

4.3. Action of Statin over Lecithin–Cholesterol Acyltransferase (LCAT)

A glycoprotein called lectin–cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) functions as both a phospholipase A2 and an acyltransferase. It has a role in reverse cholesterol transport and is necessary for a balanced activity between all lipoprotein classes. It is produced by the liver and circulates reversibly bound to HDL and LDL in the plasma. On the surfaces of lipoproteins, lecithin–cholesterol acyltransferase catalyzes the esterification of free cholesterol. The most effective activator of LCAT, apo A-I, is found in HDL, which is the preferred substrate for it. The lipid content of HDL affects apo A’s capacity to activate LCAT; it is the most potent of the small HDL particles with a low phospholipid to apo A-I ratio [70,71,72].
The expansion of HDL particle cores is caused by the cholesteryl esters produced by LCAT. Although there is conflicting information regarding LCAT’s role in atherosclerosis development, it may represent a rate-limiting step in reverse cholesterol transport, making it a real point for therapy in atherosclerosis prevention. Injections using recombinant human LCAT (rhLCAT), cell and gene therapy, and the use of small chemical activators have all been tried with encouraging outcomes [73,74,75,76].
RhLCAT treatments have recently undergone promising clinical phase II trials. A new study demonstrated that overexpression of LCAT-improved LDL receptor-mediated RCT led to the regression of atherosclerosis and found MEDI6012 (one rhLCAT) as possible synergic with statins [77].

4.4. Administration of Statins

The recommendation for short-life statins (simvastatin, pravastatin, or fluvastatin) is to be taken in the evening, due to the fact that cholesterol synthesis happens at night during fasting [78]. Longer half-life statins (atorvastatin and rosuvastatin) can be administered in the morning or the evening daily at roughly the same time. As its absorption increases with food, lovastatin should be administered with meals [51,79].
Statins administration varies in specific patient population groups.
The statin metabolism is gender-dependent, so women have unique statin metabolic characteristics, due to lower glomerular filtration rates, higher body fat percentages, reduced muscle mass, overall faster statin metabolism and a higher risk of polypharmacy for older subjects or teratogenic effects for younger ones [80]. The effects and benefits of statin therapy are similar in men and women, but women receive its recommendation more rarely and in lower doses [81,82].
Subjects combining both statins and exercise have better results than those using only statin therapy regarding insulin sensitivity, exercise capacity, and lowering mortality [83].
In the elderly (>75 years of age) with clinically significant atherosclerosis and CVD, the advised therapy begins with moderate-intensity statins because of the increased side effects associated with high-intensity statins and a lower efficacy of metabolic mechanisms [84], although not all the studies show important rates of adverse age-related clinical events depending on the intensity of the statin [85].
Patients with chronic kidney disease should use atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, or simvastatin because they do not undergo renal elimination, so they do not need dose adjustment [86]. Meanwhile, statins may improve renal function by lowering albuminuria [87,88,89].
Patients with compensated liver disease could use pravastatin and rosuvastatin, because compared to other statins, they are only partially metabolized by the liver. Statins are contraindicated in patients with acute liver failure or decompensated cirrhosis [87,90,91].
The most frequent side effect of statins is myalgia, affecting up to 10% of people taking them. Another, but less frequent, side effect of statin use is myositis. It presents an increase in creatine kinase (CK) [92]. The most dangerous adverse effect of statins, rhabdomyolysis is extremely rare (less than 1 per 100,000 patients treated annually), and it is linked to a substantial rise in CK (10 times higher than normal), abrupt renal failure related to myoglobinuria, electrolyte abnormalities and hemodynamic instability [92,93]. Because statins reduce the levels of coenzyme Q10 (ubiquinone) and other byproducts of the mevalonate pathway, necessary for skeletal muscle energy generation, they produce musculoskeletal toxicity [94]. Often, the symptoms appear a few weeks to months after therapy begins. After days to weeks of stopping the medicine, patients feel better, and their serum CK levels return to normal. The statins considered to have the least side effects on a muscular level are pravastatin and fluvastatin [92,95].
Statins can lead to higher levels of serum transaminases. If those values are three times higher than normal, the dose of statin must be reduced or the statin changed (preferably pravastatin) or switched to a different class of lipid-lowering drugs, although the liver enzymes levels usually improve regardless the interruption of medication [79,96].
Proteinuria, hematuria and rhabdomyolysis, as adverse effects following administration of high-intensity statins (such as rosuvastatin and simvastatin) may induce renal failure. In patients with renal alteration atorvastatin, fluvastatin, or pravastatin are recommended options [79].
The administration of high-intensity statins suppresses cholesterol synthesis and may trigger the onset of diabetes mellitus. Cholesterol is necessary for the formation of glucose transporter type 1, which facilitates the uptake of glucose into cells. The result of the process will be a higher plasma concentration of glucose [56]. The down-regulation of glucose transporter type 4 in adipocytes, reduced insulin signaling, and impaired Ca2+ signaling in pancreatic -cells are some of the mechanisms implicated in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The impact of statins on epigenetics may also be a factor to induce diabetes mellitus through the differential expression of microRNAs [56]. Other data indicate that the diabetogenic effect of statins increases the risk of new-onset diabetes, especially in subjects with a “pre-diabetic” status [97].
Other side effects associated with statins have been reported in various case reports but they need more evidence data [84,85,86,87]. So far, lowering cholesterol drugs are not proven to increase malignancy, or neurological or respiratory symptoms [98].

5. Magnesium and Dyslipidemia

5.1. Magnesium Deficiency

Magnesium, the most common intracellular divalent cation, participates in around 300 enzymatic processes, including the metabolism of lipoprotein lipase (LPL), HMG-CoA reductase, and lecithin-cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT), as well as the attenuation of Na-K ATPase and the breakdown of glycogen [99].
Just 1% of the body’s magnesium is found in circulation (0.3% in plasma/serum), while the majority of the body’s magnesium is found in the bony tissue (60%) and intracellular (40%) compartments [100]. Magnesium is distributed differently inside each individual compartment. For instance, bone has two deposits of magnesium: one in the bone network and the other present on the bone surface. Magnesium within cells is found in the cell membrane, intracellular components, and the nucleus in some amounts. The content of magnesium in red blood cells (RBC) is three times higher in blood than it is in plasma [100]. There are currently two recognized types of magnesium shortage: acute hypomagnesemia and chronic magnesium deficit. Extreme cramps, nystagmus, refractory hypokalaemia, refractory hypocalcemia, eclampsia during pregnancy and cardiac arrhythmias are only a few of the clinical signs and symptoms of extracellular acute hypomagnesemia [101]. In some instances, they respond quickly to intravenous magnesium. Although a chronic magnesium shortage is frequently coupled with normal magnesium levels in serum (0.75–0.95 mmol/L), which is mistakenly thought to eliminate the magnesium deficiency, it represents decreased levels of magnesium inside the cells and bone [100,101]. The overall amount of magnesium absorbed and eliminated through the kidneys, as well as factors such as food intake or supplementation and serum albumin level, can all affect the body’s magnesium levels [102]. Magnesium insufficiency is also made worse by other concomitant conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease, unmanaged diabetes, or renal disfunction [103,104]. The causes that produce magnesium deficiency are presented in Table 2.
However, numerous epidemiological, experimental, and clinical studies (not dependent of the type, design, measured indexes, size, and statistical approach of these studies) have demonstrated that chronic magnesium deficiency is connected with higher risk and prevalence of the pathologies listed in Figure 3.
Also, it was discovered that a magnesium deficit could predict negative outcomes, and when supplementation or treatment was started, there was a decreased chance of pathology [101].

5.2. Magnesium and MetS

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), coronary heart disease (CHD) accounts for more than 7 million deaths each year and is the leading cause of mortality in regardless the gender [133]. It is commonly recognized that type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a significant risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). Patients with diabetes have twice the risk of developing coronary heart disease than people without the disease [104,134]. Several studies have demonstrated a link connecting CHD and metabolic syndrome (MetS), type 2 diabetes, and increased levels of oxidative and inflammatory stress biomarkers [135,136]. A complex biological process called oxidative stress is defined by an excessive creation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which function as destabilizers of the body’s REDOX balance and cause oxidative disfunction. Oxidative stress impairs every process and even affects the equilibrium of nucleic acids. ROS interact with proteins and phospholipids, which causes structural alterations in tissues and organs. Those who are predisposed to heart problems typically develop a constellation of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs). Oxidative stress is frequently linked to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) such as coronary artery disease (CAD), cardiomyopathy, or heart failure (HF), which may occur in people with hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, and other disorders [137]. According to some studies, patients with CHD and T2DM had significantly lower levels of magnesium [12,120,138,139,140]. There is also strong evidence linking magnesium deficiency to metabolic syndrome [107,135,141,142]. The elements of MetS, such as hyperglycemia, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and insulin resistance, have been linked to hypomagnesemia [12]. The components of MetS, such as insulin sensitivity, fasting blood glucose (FBG), triglyceride (TG) levels, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and high blood pressure (BP), are said to respond favorably to magnesium supplementation [138]. The aforementioned metabolic illnesses all share the common pathophysiological feature of chronic low-grade inflammation, and magnesium deficiency can both directly and indirectly cause inflammation by altering the gut flora [108]. In addition, a lack of magnesium worsens immunological function by priming phagocytes, promoting granulocyte oxidative burst, activating endothelial cells, and raising cytokine production levels [12]. Magnesium has anti-inflammatory, glucose, and insulin metabolism-improving, endothelium-dependent vasodilation-improving, and lipid profile-normalizing properties [143]. C-reactive protein (CRP), a measure of systemic inflammation and a predictor of future cardiovascular events in individuals with MetS, and serum magnesium levels are inversely correlated [104,144]. At the same time, changes in the metabolism of several micronutrients were observed in obese patients, such as decreased magnesium concentrations in the serum, plasma, and erythrocytes [105,145,146]. Magnesium supplementation has been shown to have positive effects on patients with metabolic disorders in terms of their metabolic profile [109]. For example, Asemi et al. demonstrated that magnesium supplementation in pregnant women with gestational diabetes (GDM), in the form of magnesium oxide at a dose of 250 mg per day, significantly improved glycemic control, lipoproteins, and the biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation [109]. Higher magnesium intakes were associated with lower fasting insulin levels in healthy women without diabetes [147]. The relationship between total dietary magnesium intake and insulin responses to an oral glucose tolerance test was inverse [107,121].
Recent evidence from some meta-analysis studies demonstrated the efficacy of oral magnesium supplementation in significantly decreasing various inflammatory markers, especially CRP, and increasing nitric oxide (NO) [148]. The reduction of fasting blood glucose was also observed, as well as a 3–4 mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 2–3 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure (DBP), with a beneficial impact on the lipid profile [99,106]. The experimental data show that magnesium deficiency worsens atherosclerosis while magnesium supplementation slows atherogenesis [11,149,150]. In addition, randomized controlled trials have shown that magnesium supplementation improves endothelial function while lowering blood pressure [110,111,118,124], arterial stiffness [151], fasting hyperglycemia [111,152], insulin resistance [153], and postoperative arrhythmias [150,154].

5.3. Magnesium–Statin-like Effect

Magnesium is crucial for regulating the activity of several key enzymes involved in lipid metabolism, including 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) [126,155], which controls cholesterol biosynthesis; lecithin–cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT), which lowers plasma concentrations of LDL-c and VLDL-c [99,105]; desaturase (DS) [12,99]; and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) [127,156]. LPL, DS, and LCAT activity are suppressed by hypomagnesemia, and Mg supplementation can positively affect their expression [130,155]. On the other hand, Mg deficiency is associated with increased activity of HMG-CoA reductase [125]. The ratio of saturated to unsaturated fatty acids increases and the levels of TG, LDL, HDL, and VLDL decrease when the activity of this enzyme is impaired [157]. Modulation of the gene expression of LDLR (LDL receptor) and other transcription factors, such as sterol regulatory element-binding proteins SREBP-1a and SREBP-2, may also contribute to the hypercholesterolemic effect of an inadequate intake of Mg, although the increase in LDL concentration is mediated by increased LDLR and SREBP expression [158]. According to a study in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients, the Mg levels and blood levels of oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) are linked [12]. Magnesium also seems to affect the expression of genes that regulate a number of processes, including adipogenesis, lipolysis, and inflammation, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) [105,159]. Also, research has shown that a dietary magnesium deficiency causes an higher activity of the enzyme’s serine palmitoyl CoA transferase 1 and 2, which, in turn, triggers the processes of atherogenesis, angiogenesis, and immunoreaction [12,105,160].
A 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial comparing the effects of magnesium oxide (250 mg/day) versus placebo on anthropometric indices, blood pressure, blood glucose, insulin, C-reactive protein, uric acid, and a lipid profile was performed on individuals with prediabetes (n = 86). Compared to the placebo group, subjects who took magnesium supplements had significantly increased levels of HDL cholesterol at the end of the study. However, magnesium supplementation at the dose and time mentioned above did not alter other cardiometabolic parameters [161].
Participants with moderate coronary artery disease (CAD) lowered their serum levels of LDL-C, SGOT, SGPT, and ox-LDL by taking 300 mg/day of MgSO4 for six months in a double-blind, randomized clinical investigation [146].
In addition, a recent meta-analysis of studies that included people with hypertriglyceridemia revealed an important decrease in triglyceride levels after magnesium supplementation, indicating a potential beneficial effect of magnesium supplementation on dyslipidemic diseases [99].
Clinical research using oral Mg supplementation provides the majority of the evidence for relationships between Mg and the blood lipid profile [112,113,126,156,157,162,163,164,165,166]. The authors of various meta-analyses describing this link stressed the inconsistency of the findings of this research [167,168]. The significant variety of groups examined, the numerous approaches to measuring blood serum Mg concentration, and the absence of stratification of the subgroups of patients compared have all contributed to the ambiguity of the results produced in this sector [12].

6. Statin vs. Magnesium Comparison for Cholesterol Control

A comparison of Mg effects on lipoproteins with those of statin medication is necessary because Mg2+-ATP is the regulating factor for the rate-limiting enzyme in the cholesterol production sequence which the statin pharmaceuticals target. A sequence of enzymatic processes that change HMG-CoA into cholesterol results in the synthesis of cholesterol in the circulation, as well as the cholesterol needed for hormone production and membrane repair. The enzymatic conversion of HMGCoA to mevalonate via HMGCoA reductase is the pathway rate-limiting step. Mg and statins both block the enzyme. Major trials have repeatedly demonstrated that statins lower cholesterol blood levels by 35 to 65% when taken by patients with high LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) values [122,169,170,171,172,173]. Moreover, they lower the frequency of heart attacks, angina, other nonfatal cardiac events, and cardiac, stroke, and overall mortality. These statin effects come more from lowering mevalonate formation than from lowering LDL-C. Mg has effects that are similar to statin effects, such as improving endothelial function, inhibiting vascular smooth muscle cell and macrophage proliferation and migration, promoting plaque stabilization and regression, and lowering inflammation. For instance, Mg is required for the enzyme that inactivates HMG-CoA reductase, transforming it in a modulater rather than an inhibitor of Reductase. Lecithin–cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT), which lowers triglyceride and LDL-C levels and boosts HDL-C levels, also needs magnesium to function. Statins have no direct effect on desaturase, another Mg-dependent enzyme involved in lipid metabolism.
A 4-week treatment with oral Mg supplementation (Mg (OH)2: 411–548 mg Mg/day) or a placebo was given to 33 participants in double-blind, placebo-controlled research published in 1997 in the British Journal of Nutrition [122]. The urine excretion of Mg considerably grew in the first two weeks and the next few weeks of Mg supplementation, and the urinary excretion of Na also significantly increased throughout the experimental period. Apolipoprotein AI, HDL cholesterol, and lecithin–cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) all showed statistically significant increases after the Mg supplementation. During the experimental period, a positively significant connection between the levels of LCAT and urine Mg excretion was shown (displayed as a percentage of the run-in value). When compared to the first two weeks and the run-in periods, the total cholesterol:HDL cholesterol ratio significantly decreased over the final two weeks of the magnesium supplementation, but this did not happen in the placebo group. These findings imply that Mg supplementation may improve serum lipids in humans by activating LCAT while reducing blood pressure by suppressing adrenergic activity and possibly natriuresis [122,169,170,171,172]. Statins have different effects from those produced by naturally occurring magnesium levels or by taking magnesium supplements, as shown by A. Rosanoff and her colleagues in a study published in Nutrients, in 2021 [172].
A study that was published in 2014 examined how patients with hyperlipidemia responded to using magnesium supplementation in addition to atorvastatin. This study’s major goal was to clarify if taking oral magnesium supplements could prevent or delay the myalgia that statins cause. According to the findings, patients who received atorvastatin along with a magnesium treatment had significantly increased levels of serum magnesium, plasma L-CAT, and HDL cholesterol, as well as significantly decresed levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides as well as non-significantly decreased levels of CK compared to patients who received atorvastatin alone [173]. Finally, magnesium supplements work better than atorvastatin alone at improving all-lipid profiles and controlling dyslipidemia. The Mg supplement to atorvastatin may delay and offer some protection against statin-induced myopathy, which, in turn, may boost patient compliance, but it does not prevent the rise of CK [173].
Another study published in 2021 examined the potential for treating HFD-induced bone loss in mice with a combination of Mg2+ and simvastatin (SIM) and the underlying mechanisms. Simvastatin and magnesium work together synergistically to reduce bone loss caused by a high-fat diet. Their formulation might serve as a more affordable alternative therapy for obesity-related bone loss [128]. Lecithin–cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT), that decreases LDL and triglyceride levels and increases HDL-cholesterol levels, is activated by magnesium, which also targets the enzyme HMG CoA reductase [72,73,74,75,105]. Additionally, magnesium activates desaturase and other crucial enzymes involved in lipid metabolism, which are not directly affected by statins. Omega-3 linoleic acid and omega-6 linolenic acid, which are necessary fatty acids, are first converted into prostaglandins by the enzyme desaturase [105,118]. Prostaglandins, like prenylated proteins, have a domino effect of physiological actions that are essential for cardiovascular and general health.
Although there are several enzymes involved in the metabolism of lipids and cholesterol, HMG CoA reductase is a key one. In a dosage–response relationship, statins work by temporarily inhibiting the enzyme, whereas the magnesium ion (Mg2) is a crucial component of the intricate control and regulation of this crucial process [105,118,122].
While some statins can increase HDL levels and reduce triglycerides, Mg supplements reliably lower LDL cholesterol [128,169,170,171,172,173,174].
While Mg supplements tend to protect against myopathy and have only brief diarrhea or moderate gastrointestinal distress as a side effect, statins elevate hepatic enzymes, may lead to myopathy, and have many additional side effects [116,119,123,131,175,176,177,178] (Table S1). Statins and normal Mg levels work both to prevent blood coagulation, reduce inflammation, and prevent atherogenesis formation [114,115,117,118,129,132,179].

7. Conclusions

Magnesium supplements have complementary and parallel effects to those of statin medication. Both inhibit the HMG-CoA reductase enzyme, which is responsible for converting HMG-CoA to mevalonate, the first step in the production of cholesterol.
Mg triggers a desaturase, which turns 3- and 6-omega fatty acids into prostaglandins, as well as LCAT (lecithin–cholesterol-acyl-transferase), an enzyme that lowers TG and LDL-C levels and boosts HDL-C levels.
Similar to statins, Mg has functions that are crucial to cardiovascular and general health. The association between Mg supplementation and atorvastatin is able to postpone and offer some protection for myopathy as a side effect induced by statins, which, in turn, may boost patient compliance, but it does not prevent the rise of CK.
Most clinical trials have supported the positive impact of magnesium supplementation and diet in the context of metabolic diseases. Targeting Mg homeostasis may constitute a new strategy to prevent and treat metabolic diseases and their repercussions, even though the precise mechanisms of Mg action are still unknown. Further randomized controlled trials examining Mg supplementation methods are nevertheless required.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb45040205/s1, Table S1: Research Investigating the Interaction Between Serum Lipids and Magnesium

Author Contributions

R.N.: conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, final revision; I.G.: contribution to writing the original draft, review, and editing B.I.M.: contribution to writing the original draft, review, and editing; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Publication of this paper was supported by the University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, through the institutional program Publish not Perish.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vesa, C.M.; Bungau, S.G. Novel Molecules in Diabetes Mellitus, Dyslipidemia and Cardiovascular Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mir, R.; Elfaki, I.; Javid, J.; Barnawi, J.; Altayar, M.A.; Albalawi, S.O.; Jalal, M.M.; Tayeb, F.J.; Yousif, A.; Ullah, M.F.; et al. Genetic Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease: The Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase 3 (eNOS3), Krüppel-Like Factor-14 (KLF-14), Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR), MiRNAs27a and Their Association with the Predisposition and Susceptibility to Coronary Artery Disease. Life 2022, 12, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Libby, P.; Buring, J.E.; Badimon, L.; Hansson, G.K.; Deanfield, J.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Tokgozoglu, L.; Lewis, E.F. Atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2019, 5, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Elfaki, I.; Mir, R.; Abu-Duhier, F.; Alotaibi, M.; Alalawy, A.; Barnawi, J.; Babakr, A.; Mir, M.; Mirghani, H. Clinical Implications of MiR128, Angiotensin I Converting Enzyme and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Abnormalities and Their Association with T2D. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2021, 43, 1859–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Padam, P.; Barton, L.; Wilson, S.; David, A.; Walji, S.; de Lorenzo, F.; Ray, K.K.; Jones, B.; Cegla, J. Lipid lowering with inclisiran: A real-world single-center experience. Open Heart 2022, 9, e002184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aygun, S.; Tokgozoglu, L. Comparison of Current International Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Otelea, M.R.; Nartea, R.; Popescu, F.G.; Covaleov, A.; Mitoiu, B.I.; Nica, A.S. The Pathological Links between Adiposity and the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 2646–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Klop, B.; Elte, J.W.; Cabezas, M.C. Dyslipidemia in obesity: Mechanisms and potential targets. Nutrients 2013, 5, 1218–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Manna, P.; Jain, S.K. Obesity, Oxidative Stress, Adipose Tissue Dysfunction, and the Associated Health Risks: Causes and Therapeutic Strategies. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 2015, 13, 423–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Li, S.; Chen, W.; Srinivasan, S.R.; Bond, M.G.; Tang, R.; Urbina, E.M.; Berenson, G.S. Childhood cardiovascular risk factors and carotid vascular changes in adulthood: The Bogalusa Heart Study. JAMA 2003, 290, 2271–2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Morais, J.B.S.; Severo, J.S.; Santos, L.R.D.; de Sousa Melo, S.R.; de Oliveira Santos, R.; de Oliveira, A.R.S.; Cruz, K.J.C.; do Nascimento Marreiro, D. Role of Magnesium in Oxidative Stress in Individuals with Obesity. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2017, 176, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pelczyńska, M.; Moszak, M.; Bogdański, P. The Role of Magnesium in the Pathogenesis of Metabolic Disorders. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Castellanos-Gutiérrez, A.; Sánchez-Pimienta, T.G.; Carriquiry, A.; da Costa, T.M.; Ariza, A.C. Higher dietary magnesium intake is associated with lower body mass index, waist circumference and serum glucose in Mexican adults. Nutr. J. 2018, 17, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jacobs, D.R.; Woo, J.G.; Sinaiko, A.R.; Daniels, S.R.; Ikonen, J.; Juonala, M.; Kartiosuo, N.; Lehtimäki, T.; Magnussen, C.G.; Viikari, J.S.A.; et al. Childhood cardiovascular risk factors and adult cardiovascular events. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 1877–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gordon, S.M. Chapter 12—Proteomic Diversity in HDL: A Driving Force for Particle Function and Target for Therapeutic Intervention. In The HDL Handbook, 2nd ed.; Tsugikazu, K., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 293–322. ISBN 9780124078673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. .Yeang, C.; Witztum, J.L.; Tsimikas, S. Novel method for quantification of lipoprotein (a)-cholesterol: Implications for improving accuracy of LDL-C measurements. J. Lipid Res. 2021, 62, 100053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Flores-Dorantes, M.T.; Díaz-López, Y.E.; Gutiérrez-Aguilar, R. Environment and Gene Association with Obesity and Their Impact on Neurodegenerative and Neurodevelopmental Diseases. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gillard, B.K.; Lin, H.Y.; Massey, J.B.; Pownall, H.J. Apolipoproteins A-I, A-II, and E are independently distributed among intracellular and newly secreted HDL of human hepatoma cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1791, 1125–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pirahanchi, Y.; Sinawe, H.; Dimri, M. Biochemistry, LDL Cholesterol. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, X.; Su, T.; Xiao, H.; Gao, P.; Xiong, C.; Liu, J.; Zou, H. Association of the HDL-c Level with HsCRP, IL-6, U-NAG, RBP and Cys-C in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, and Chronic Kidney Disease: An Epidemiological Survey. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2020, 13, 3645–3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rosenson, R.S.; Davidson, M.H.; Le, N.A.; Burkle, J.; Pourfarzib, R. Underappreciated opportunities for high-density lipoprotein particles in risk stratification and potential targets of therapy. Cardiovasc. Drug Ther. 2015, 29, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kontush, A.; Chapman, M.J. Antiatherogenic small, dense HDL—Guardian angel of the arterial wall? Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 2006, 3, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khan, S.A.; Ilies, M.A. The Phospholipase A2 Superfamily: Structure, Isozymes, Catalysis, Physiologic and Pathologic Roles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Guerrini, V.; Gennaro, M.L. Foam Cells: One Size Doesn’t Fit All. Trends Immunol. 2019, 40, 1163–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kuklenyik, Z.; Jones, J.; Gardner, M.; Schieltz, D.; Parks, B.; Toth, C.; Rees, J.; Andrews, M.; Carter, K.; Lehtikoski, A.; et al. Core lipid, surface lipid and apolipoprotein composition analysis of lipoprotein particles as a function of particle size in one workflow integrating asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PLoS ONE. 2018, 13, e0194797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Tsimikas, S.; Karwatowska-Prokopczuk, E.; Gouni-Berthold, I.; Tardif, J.C.; Baum, S.J.; Steinhagen-Thiessen, E.; Shapiro, M.D.; Stroes, E.S.; Moriarty, P.M.; Nordestgaard, B.G.; et al. Lipoprotein(a) Reduction in Persons with Cardiovascular Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schmidt, K.; Noureen, A.; Kronenberg, F.; Utermann, G. Structure, function, and genetics of lipoprotein (a). J. Lipid Res. 2016, 57, 1339–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Tsimikas, S.; Fazio, S.; Ferdinand, K.C.; Ginsberg, H.N.; Koschinsky, M.L.; Marcovina, S.M.; Moriarty, P.M.; Rader, D.J.; Remaley, A.T.; Reyes-Soffer, G.; et al. NHLBI working group recommendations to reduce lipoprotein(a)-the mediated risk of cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kunnen, S.; Van Eck, M. Lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase: Old friend or foe in atherosclerosis? J. Lipid Res. 2012, 53, 1783–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Nordestgaard, B.G.; Langsted, A. Lipoprotein (a) as a cause of cardiovascular disease: Insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology. J. Lipid Res. 2016, 57, 1953–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Viney, N.J.; Yeang, C.; Yang, X.; Xia, S.; Witztum, J.L.; Tsimikas, S. Relationship between “LDL-C”, estimated true LDL-C, apolipoprotein B-100, and PCSK9 levels following lipoprotein(a) lowering with an antisense oligonucleotide. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2018, 12, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Raitakari, O.; Kartiosuo, N.; Pahkala, K.; Hutri-Kähönen, N.; Bazzano, L.A.; Chen, W.; Urbina, E.M.; Jacobs, D.R.; Sinaiko, A.; Steinberger, J.; et al. Lipoprotein(a) in Youth and Prediction of Major Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adulthood. Circulation 2023, 147, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shen, W.J.; Azhar, S.; Kraemer, F.B. SR-B1: A Unique Multifunctional Receptor for Cholesterol Influx and Efflux. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2018, 80, 95–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wilson, D.P.; Koschinsky, M.L.; Moriarty, P.M. Expert position statements: Comparison of recommendations for the care of adults and youth with elevated lipoprotein(a). Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2021, 28, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sundaram, M.; Yao, Z. Recent progress in understanding protein and lipid factors affecting hepatic VLDL assembly and secretion. Nutr. Metab. 2010, 7, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Feingold, K.R. Triglyceride Lowering Drugs. In Endotext; Feingold, K.R., Anawalt, B., Blackman, M.R., Boyce, A., Chrousos, G., Corpas, E., de Herder, W.W., Dhatariya, K., Hofland, J., Dungan, K., et al., Eds.; MDText.com, Inc.: South Dartmouth, MA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  37. Botham, K.M.; Mayes, P.A. Lipid Transport & Storage. In Harper’s Illustrated Biochemistry; Rodwell, V.W., Bender, D.A., Botham, K.M., Kennelly, P.J., Weil, P., Eds.; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Available online: https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=1366&sectionid=73244168 (accessed on 11 February 2023).
  38. Kumari, A.; Kristensen, K.K.; Ploug, M.; Winther, A.-M.L. The Importance of Lipoprotein Lipase Regulation in Atherosclerosis. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Leth-Espensen, K.Z.; Kristensen, K.K.; Kumari, A.; Winther, A.-M.L.; Young, S.G.; Jørgensen, T.J.D.; Ploug, M. The intrinsic instability of the hydrolase domain of lipoprotein lipase facilitates its inactivation by ANGPTL4-catalyzed unfolding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2026650118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Birrane, G.; Beigneux, A.P.; Dwyer, B.; Strack-Logue, B.; Kristensen, K.K.; Francone, O.L.; Fong, L.G.; Mertens, H.D.T.; Pan, C.Q.; Ploug, M.; et al. Structure of the lipoprotein lipase–GPIHBP1 complex that mediates plasma triglyceride hydrolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 1723–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kristensen, K.K.; Leth-Espensen, K.Z.; Mertens, H.D.T.; Birrane, G.; Meiyappan, M.; Olivecrona, G.; Jørgensen, T.J.D.; Young, S.G.; Ploug, M. Unfolding of monomeric lipoprotein lipase by ANGPTL4: Insight into the regulation of plasma triglyceride metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 4337–4346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. He, C.; Weston, T.A.; Jung, R.S.; Fong, L.G.; Young, S.G.; Jiang, H.; He, C.; Weston, T.A.; Jung, R.S.; Heizer, P.; et al. NanoSIMS Analysis of Intravascular Lipolysis and Lipid Movement across Capillaries and into Article NanoSIMS Analysis of Intravascular Lipolysis and Lipid Movement across Capillaries and into Cardiomyocytes. Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 1055.e3–1066.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Grosskopf, I.; Baroukh, N.; Lee, S.-J.; Kamari, Y.; Harats, D.; Rubin, E.M.; Pennacchio, L.A.; Cooper, A.D. Apolipoprotein A-V Deficiency Results in Marked Hypertriglyceridemia Attributable to Decreased Lipolysis of Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins and Removal of Their Remnants. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005, 25, 2573–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. O’Brien, P.J.; Alborn, W.E.; Sloan, J.H.; Ulmer, M.; Boodhoo, A.; Knierman, M.D.; Schultze, A.E.; Konrad, R.J. The Novel Apolipoprotein A5 Is Present in Human Serum, Is Associated with VLDL, HDL, and Chylomicrons, and Circulates at Very Low Concentrations Compared with Other Apolipoproteins. Clin. Chem. 2005, 51, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Lookene, A.; Beckstead, J.A.; Nilsson, S.; Olivecrona, G.; Ryan, R.O. Apolipoprotein A-V-heparin interactions: Implications for plasma lipoprotein metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 25383–25387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Skoczyńska, A.; Wojakowska, A.; Turczyn, B.; Zatońska, K.; Wołyniec, M.; Szuba, A. Serum CETP and PLTP activity in middle-aged men living in urban or rural area of the Lower Silesia region. PURE Poland sub-study. Arch. Med. Sci. 2016, 12, 704–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Williams, K.J.; Chen, K. Recent insights into factors affecting remnant lipoprotein uptake. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2010, 21, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Björkegren, J.; Karpe, F.; Milne, R.W.; Hamsten, A. Differences in apolipoprotein and lipid composition between human chylomicron remnants and very low-density lipoproteins isolated from fasting and postprandial plasma. J. Lipid Res. 1998, 39, 1412–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Altabas, V.; Biloš, L.S.K. The Role of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Atherosclerosis and Impact of Anti-Lipemic Treatments on Endothelial Repair. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dzobo, K.E.; Hanford, K.M.L.; Kroon, J. Vascular Metabolism as Driver of Atherosclerosis: Linking Endothelial Metabolism to Inflammation. Immunometabolism 2021, 3, e210020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sizar, O.; Khare, S.; Jamil, R.T.; Talati, R. Statin Medications. National Library of Medicine. 29 November 2022. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430940/ (accessed on 19 February 2023).
  52. Bansal, A.B.; Cassagnol, M. HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors. National Library of Medicine. 4 July 2022. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542212/ (accessed on 18 February 2023).
  53. Singh, S.; Zahoor, I.; Sharma, N.; Behl, T.; Kanojia, N.; Sehgal, A.; Mohan, S.; Almoshari, Y.; Salawi, A.; Aleya, L.; et al. Insights into the pivotal role of statins and its nanoformulations in hyperlipidemia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 76514–76531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Thongtang, N.; Sitthananun, C.; Sriussadaporn, S.; Nitiyanant, W. Efficacy of low- and moderate-intensity statins for achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets in Thai type 2 diabetic patients. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2017, 16, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Barakat, L.; Jayyousi, A.; Bener, A.; Zuby, B.; Zirie, M. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin, Atorvastatin and Pravastatin among Dyslipidemic Diabetic Patients. ISRN Pharmacol. 2013, 2013, 146579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Galicia-Garcia, U.; Jebari, S.; Larrea-Sebal, A.; Uribe, K.B.; Siddiqi, H.; Ostolaza, H.; Benito-Vicente, A.; Martin, C. Statin Treatment-Induced Development of Type 2 Diabetes: From Clinical Evidence to Mechanistic Insights. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Climent, E.; Benaiges, D.; Pedro-Botet, J. Hydrophilic or Lipophilic Statins? Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 687585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ward, N.C.; Watts, G.F.; Ecke, R.H. Statin Toxicity. Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Implications. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 328–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Duan, Y.; Gong, K.; Xu, S.; Zhang, F.; Meng, X.; Han, J. Regulation of cholesterol homeostasis in health and diseases: From mechanisms to targeted therapeutics. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Friesen, J.A.; Rodwell, V.W. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A (HMG-CoA) reductases. Genome Biol. 2004, 5, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Fong, C.W. Statins in therapy: Understanding their hydrophilicity, lipophilicity, binding to 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, ability to cross the blood brain barrier and metabolic stability based on electrostatic molecular orbital studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 85, 661–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Son, M.; Baek, A.; Sakkiah, S.; Park, C.; John, S.; Lee, K.W. Exploration of Virtual Candidates for Human HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors Using Pharmacophore Modeling and Molecular Dynamics Simulations. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Das, K.C.; Hossain, M.U.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Salimullah, M.; Akhteruzzaman, S. High-Risk Polymorphisms Associated with the Molecular Function of Human HMGCR Gene Infer the Inhibition of Cholesterol Biosynthesis. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 4558867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Shu, X.; Wu, J.; Zhang, T.; Ma, X.; Du, Z.; Xu, J.; You, J.; Wang, L.; Chen, N.; Luo, M.; et al. Statin-Induced Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Depletion Promotes Ferroptosis-Related Senescence in Adipose Tissue. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Formanowicz, D.; Radom, M.; Rybarczyk, A.; Tanas, K.; Formanowicz, P. Control of Cholesterol Metabolism Using a Systems Approach. Biology 2022, 11, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jebari-Benslaiman, S.; Galicia-Garcia, U.; Larrea-Sebal, A.; Olaetxea, J.R.; Alloza, I.; Vandenbroeck, K.; Benito-Vicente, A.; Martin, C. Pathophysiology of Atherosclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Zhu, Y.; Xian, X.; Wang, Z.; Bi, Y.; Chen, Q.; Han, X.; Tang, D.; Chen, R. Research Progress on the Relationship between Atherosclerosis and Inflammation. Biomolecules 2018, 8, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Koushki, K.; Shahbaz, S.K.; Mashayekhi, K.; Sadeghi, M.; Zayeri, Z.D.; Taba, M.Y.; Banach, M.; Al-Rasadi, K.; Johnston, T.P.; Sahebkar, A. Anti-inflammatory Action of Statins in Cardiovascular Disease: The Role of Inflammasome and Toll-Like Receptor Pathways. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2021, 60, 175–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wan Ahmad, W.N.; Sakri, F.; Mokhsin, A.; Rahman, T.; Mohd Nasir, N.; Abdul-Razak, S.; Md Yasin, M.; Mohd Ismail, A.; Ismail, Z.; Nawawi, H. Low serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration is an independent predictor for enhanced inflammation and endothelial activation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116867, Erratum in PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Saeedi, R.; Li, M.; Frohlich, J. A review on lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency. Clin. Biochem. 2015, 48, 472–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ossoli, A.; Pavanello, C.; Calabresi, L. High-Density Lipoprotein, Lecithin:Cholesterol Acyltransferase, and Atherosclerosis. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 31, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Mehta, R.; Elias-Lopez, D.; Martagon, A.J.; Perez-Mwndez, O.A.; Odonez Sanchez, M.L.; Segura, Y.; Tusie, M.T.; Aguilar-Salinas, C.A. LCAT deficiency: A systematic review with the clinical and genetic description of Mexican kindred. Lipids Health Dis. 2021, 20, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ossoli, A.; Simonelli, S.; Varrenti, M.; Morici, N.; Oliva, F.; Stucchi, M.; Gomaraschi, M.; Strazzella, A.; Arnaboldi, L.; Thomas, M.J.; et al. Recombinant LCAT (lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase) rescues defective HDL (high-density lipoprotein)-mediated endothelial protection in acute coronary syndrome. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 39, 915–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Oldoni, F.; Baldassarre, D.; Castelnuovo, S.; Ossoli, A.; Amato, M.; van Capelleveen, J.; Hovingh, G.K.; De Groot, E.; Bochem, A.; Simonelli, S.; et al. Complete and Partial Lecithin:Cholesterol Acyltransferase Deficiency Is Differentially Associated with Atherosclerosis. Circulation 2018, 138, 1000–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Freeman, L.A.; Karathanasis, S.; Remaley, A.T. Novel LCAT-based Therapeutic Approaches. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2020, 31, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Pedrelli, M.; Parini, P.; Kindberg, J.; Arnemo, J.M.; Bjorkhem, I.; Aasa, U.; Westerståhl, M.; Walentinsson, A.; Pavanello, C.; Turri, M.; et al. Vasculoprotective properties of plasma lipoproteins from brown bears (Ursus arctos). J Lipid Res 2021, 62, 100065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. George, R.T.; Abuhatzira, L.; Stoughton, S.M.; Karathanasis, S.K.; She, D.; Jin, C.; Buss, N.; Bakker Arkema, B.; Ongstad, E.L.; Koren, M.; et al. MEDI6012: Recombinant human lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein receptor-mediated reverse cholesterol transport. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e01457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kamal, S.M. Effects of single-dose morning and evening administration of pravastatin on antioxidant markers in cholesterol-fed rabbits. J. Exp. Pharmacol. 2011, 3, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Newman, C.B.; Preiss, D.; Tobert, J.A.; Jacobson, T.A.; Page, R.L.; Goldstein, L.B.; Chin, C.; Tannock, L.R.; Miller, M.; Raghuveer, G.; et al. Statin Safety and Associated Adverse Events: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 39, e38–e81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Gheorghe, G.; Toth, P.P.; Bungau, S.; Behl, T.; Ilie, M.; Pantea Stoian, A.; Bratu, O.G.; Bacalbasa, N.; Rus, M.; Diaconu, C.C. Cardiovascular Risk and Statin Therapy Consideration in Women. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Peters, S.A.E.; Colantonio, L.D.; Zhao, H.; Bittner, V.; Dai, Y.; Farkouh, M.E.; Monda, K.L.; Safford, M.M.; Muntner, P.; Woodward, M. Sex Differences in High-Intensity Statin Use Following Myocardial Infarction in the United States. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 1729–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Nanna, M.G.; Wang, T.Y.; Xiang, Q.; Goldberg, A.C.; Robinson, J.G.; Roger, V.L.; Virani, S.S.; Wilson, P.W.F.; Louie, M.J.; Koren, A.; et al. Sex Differences in the Use of Statins in Community Practice. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2019, 12, e005562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Gui, Y.J.; Liao, C.X.; Liu, Q.; Guo, Y.; Yang, T.; Chen, J.Y.; Wang, Y.T.; Hu, J.H.; Xu, D.Y. Efficacy and Safety of Statins and Exercise Combination Therapy Compared to Statin Monotherapy in Patients with Dyslipidaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2017, 24, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Lee, O.S.; Zhang, J.; Jung, S.H.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, M.K.; Lee, H.Y. High-Intensity Statin Therapy Is “Too Much,” Thus Not Indicated for Very Elderly Patients. Pulse 2018, 6, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lee, K.; Lee, M.; Kim, D.W.; Kim, J.; Lim, S.; Choo, E.H.; Kim, C.; Park, C.S.; Kim, H.Y.; Yoo, K.D.; et al. Clinical impact of statin intensity according to age in patients with acute myocardial infarction. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0269301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Karie, S.; Launay-Vacher, V.; Deray, G.; Isnard-Bagnis, C. Statins in patients with kidney failure: Efficacy, tolerance, and prescription guidelines in patients with chronic kidney disease and renal transplant. Presse Med. 2006, 35 Pt 1, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhao, L.; Li, S.; Gao, Y. Efficacy of statins on renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ren Fail. 2021, 43, 718–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Vogt, L.; Bangalore, S.; Fayyad, R.; Melamed, S.; Hovingh, K.; DeMicco, D.; Waters, D.D. Atorvastatin Has a Dose-Dependent Beneficial Effect on Kidney Function and Associated Cardiovascular Outcomes: Post Hoc Analysis of 6 Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019, 8, e010827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Borges, R.D.P.; Degobi, N.A.H.; Bertoluci, M.C. Choosing statins: A review to guide clinical practice. Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 64, 639–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sung, S.; Al-Karaghouli, M.; Kalainy, S.; Cabrera Garcia, L.; Abraldes, J.G. A systematic review on pharmacokinetics, cardiovascular outcomes and safety profiles of statins in cirrhosis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021, 21, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Rossini, E.; Biscetii, F.; Rando, M.M.; Nardella, E.; Cecchini, A.L.; Nicolazzi, M.A.; Covino, M.; Gasbarrini, A.; Massetti, M.; Flex, A. Statins in Hikh Cardiovascular Risk Patients: Do Comorbidities and Characteristics Matter? Int. J. of Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Selva-O’Callaghan, A.; Alvarado-Cardenas, M.; Pinal-Fernandez, I.; Trallero-Araguas, E.; Milisenda, J.C.; Angeles Martinez, M.; Marin, A.; Labrador-Horrillo, M.; Juarez, C.; Grau-Junyent, J.M. Statin-induced myalgia and myositis: An update on pathogenesis and clinical recommendations. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2018, 14, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Torres, P.A.; Helmstetter, J.A.; Kaye, A.M.; Kaye, A.D. Rhabdomyolysis: Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Ochsner J. 2015, 15, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Buettner, C.; Greenman, R.L.; Ngo, L.H.; Wu, J.S. Effects of Coenzyme Q10 on Skeletal Muscle Oxidative Metabolism in Statin Users Assessed Using 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Study. J. Nat. Sci. 2016, 2, e212. [Google Scholar]
  95. Attardo, S.; Musumeci, O.; Velardo, D.; Toscano, A. Statins Neuromuscular Adverse Effects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Cheon, D.Y.; Jo, S.-H. Adverse effects of statin therapy and their treatment. Cardiovasc. Prev. Pharmacother. 2022, 4, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Perego, C.; Da Dalt, L.; Pirillo, A.; Galli, A.; Catapano, A.L.; Norata, G.D. Cholesterol metabolism, pancreatic β-cell function and diabetes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2019, 1865, 2149–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ramkumar, S.; Raghunath, A.; Raghunath, S. Statin Therapy: Review of Safety and Potential Side Effects. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016, 32, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Simental-Mendía, L.E.; Simental-Mendía, M.; Sahebkar, A.; Rodríguez-Morán, M.; Guerrero-Romero, F. Effect of Magnesium Supplementation on Lipid Profile: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017, 73, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Costello, R.B.; Elin, R.J.; Rosanoff, A.; Wallace, T.C.; Guerrero-Romero, F.; Hruby, A.; Lutsey, P.L.; Nielsen, F.H.; Rodriguez-Moran, M.; Song, Y.; et al. Perspective: The Case for an Evidence-Based Reference Interval for Serum Magnesium: The Time Has Come. Adv. Nutr. 2016, 7, 977–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Ismail, A.A.A.; Ismail, Y.; Ismail, A.A. Chronic Magnesium Deficiency and Human Disease; Time for Reappraisal? QJM Int. J. Med. 2018, 111, 759–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Al Alawi, A.M.; Majoni, S.W.; Falhammar, H. Magnesium and Human Health: Perspectives and Research Directions. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2018, 2018, 9041694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Ebrahimi Mousavi, S.; Ghoreishy, S.M.; Hemmati, A.; Mohammadi, H. Association between Magnesium Concentrations and Prediabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 24388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Alkazemi, D.; Alsouri, N.; Zafar, T.; Kubow, S. Hypomagnesemia and the Metabolic Syndrome among Apparently Healthy Kuwaiti Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Dos Santos, L.R.; Melo, S.R.D.S.; Severo, J.S.; Morais, J.B.S.; da Silva, L.D.; de Paiva Sousa, M.; de Sousa, T.G.V.; Henriques, G.S.; do Nascimento Marreiro, D. Cardiovascular Diseases in Obesity: What Is the Role of Magnesium? Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 4020–4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Rodríguez-Morán, M.; Simental-Mendía, L.E.; Gamboa-Gómez, C.I.; Guerrero-Romero, F. Oral Magnesium Supplementation and Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 2018, 25, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Barbagallo, M.; Veronese, N.; Dominguez, L.J. Magnesium in Aging, Health and Diseases. Nutrients 2021, 13, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lobionda, S.; Sittipo, P.; Kwon, H.Y.; Lee, Y.K. The role of gut microbiota in intestinal inflammation with respect to diet and extrinsic stressors. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Hamedifard, Z.; Farrokhian, A.; Reiner, Ž.; Bahmani, F.; Asemi, Z.; Ghotbi, M.; Taghizadeh, M. The Effects of Combined Magnesium and Zinc Supplementation on Metabolic Status in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Heart Disease. Lipids Health Dis. 2020, 19, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Cunha, A.R.; D’El-Rei, J.; Medeiros, F.; Umbelino, B.; Oigman, W.; Touyz, R.M.; Neves, M.F. Oral Magnesium Supplementation Improves Endothelial Function and Attenuates Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Thiazide-Treated Hypertensive Women. J. Hypertens. 2017, 35, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Verma, H.; Garg, R. Effect of Magnesium Supplementation on Type 2 Diabetes Associated Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2017, 30, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Guerrero-Romero, F.; Rodríguez-Morán, M. Low Serum Magnesium Levels and Metabolic Syndrome. Acta Diabetol. 2002, 39, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rasheed, H.; Elahi, S.; Ajaz, H. Serum Magnesium and Atherogenic Lipid Fractions in Type II Diabetic Patients of Lahore, Pakistan. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2012, 148, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Toprak, O.; Sarı, Y.; Koç, A.; Sarı, E.; Kırık, A. The Impact of Hypomagnesemia on Erectile Dysfunction in Elderly, Non-Diabetic, Stage 3 and 4 Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study. Clin. Interv. Aging 2017, 12, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Dey, R.; Rajappa, M.; Parameswaran, S.; Revathy, G. Hypomagnesemia and Atherogenic Dyslipidemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Surrogate Markers for Increased Cardiovascular Risk. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2015, 19, 1054–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Bain, L.K.; Myint, P.K.; Jennings, A.; Lentjes, M.A.; Luben, R.N.; Khaw, K.T.; Wareham, N.J.; Welch, A.A. The relationship between dietary magnesium intake, stroke and its major risk factors, blood pressure and cholesterol, in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 196, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Yuan, Z.; Liu, C.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ye, H.; Jin, L.; Ruan, L.; Sun, Z.; Zhu, Y. Higher Levels of Magnesium and Lower Levels of Calcium in Whole Blood Are Positively Correlated with the Metabolic Syndrome in a Chinese Population: A Case-Control Study. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2016, 69, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Rosanoff, A.; Costello, R.B.; Johnson, G.H. Effectively Prescribing Oral Magnesium Therapy for Hypertension: A Categorized Systematic Review of 49 Clinical Trials. Nutrients 2021, 13, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Jin, H.; Nicodemus-Johnson, J. Gender and Age Stratified Analyses of Nutrient and Dietary Pattern Associations with Circulating Lipid Levels Identify Novel Gender and Age-Specific Correlations. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. He, K.; Liu, K.; Daviglus, M.L.; Morris, S.J.; Loria, C.M.; Van Horn, L.; Jacobs, D.R.; Savage, P.J. Magnesium Intake and Incidence of Metabolic Syndrome Among Young Adults. Circulation 2006, 113, 1675–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Humphries, S.; Kushner, H.; Falkner, B. Low Dietary Magnesium Is Associated with Insulin Resistance in a Sample of Young, Nondiabetic Black Americans. Am. J. Hypertens. 1999, 12, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Itoh, K.; Kawasaka, T.; Nakamura, M. The effects of high oral magnesium supplementation on blood pressure, serum lipids and related variables in apparently healthy Japanese subjects. Br. J. Nutr. 1997, 78, 737–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Jiao, Y.; Li, W.; Wang, L.; Jiang, H.; Wang, S.; Jia, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhang, B.; Ding, G. Relationship between Dietary Magnesium Intake and Metabolic Syndrome. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Dominguez, L.J.; Veronese, N.; Barbagallo, M. Magnesium and Hypertension in Old Age. Nutrients 2021, 13, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Rashvand, S.; Mobasseri, M.; Tarighat-Esfanjani, A. Effects of Choline and Magnesium Concurrent Supplementation on Coagulation and Lipid Profile in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pilot Clinical Trial. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 194, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Rotter, I.; Kosik-Bogacka, D.; Dolegowska, B.; Safranow, K.; Karakiewicz, B.; Laszczynska, M. Relationship between Serum Magnesium Concentration and Metabolic and Hormonal Disorders in Middle-Aged and Older Men. Magnes. Res. 2015, 28, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Suliburska, J.; Cofta, S.; Gajewska, E.; Kalmus, G.; Sobieska, M.; Samborski, W.; Krejpcio, Z.; Drzymala-Czyz, S.; Bogdanski, P. The Evaluation of Selected Serum Mineral Concentrations and Their Association with Insulin Resistance in Obese Adolescents. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 17, 2396–2400. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  128. Dai, B.; Li, X.; Xu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, L.; Tong, W.; Yao, H.; Chow, D.H.; Qin, L. Synergistic effects of magnesium ions and simvastatin on attenuation of high-fat diet-induced bone loss. Bioact Mater. 2021, 6, 2511–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Cambray, S.; Ibarz, M.; Bermudez-Lopez, M.; Marti-Antonio, M.; Bozic, M.; Fernandez, E.; Valdivielso, J.M. Magnesium Levels Modify the Effect of Lipid Parameters on Carotid Intima Media Thickness. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhang, Q.; Qian, Z.-Y.; Zhou, P.-H.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, D.-L.; He, N.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.-H.; Gu, Q. Effects of Oral Selenium and Magnesium Co-Supplementation on Lipid Metabolism, Antioxidative Status, Histopathological Lesions, and Related Gene Expression in Rats Fed a High-Fat Diet. Lipids Health Dis. 2018, 17, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  131. Powell-Wiley, T.M.; Poirier, P.; Burke, L.E.; Després, J.P.; Gordon-Larsen, P.; Lavie, C.J.; Lear, S.A.; Ndumele, C.E.; Neeland, I.J.; Sanders, P.; et al. Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021, 143, e984–e1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Dominguez, L.J.; Gea, A.; Ruiz-Estigarribia, L.; Sayón-Orea, C.; Fresán, U.; Barbagallo, M.; Ruiz-Canela, M.; Martínez-González, M.A. Low Dietary Magnesium and Overweight/Obesity in a Mediterranean Population: A Detrimental Synergy for the Development of Hypertension. The SUN Project. Nutrients 2020, 13, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. EFSA NDA Panel (EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies). Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for magnesium. EFSA J. 2015, 13, 4186. [Google Scholar]
  134. Song, Y.; Ridker, P.M.; Manson, J.E.; Cook, N.R.; Buring, J.E.; Liu, S. Magnesium Intake, C-Reactive Protein, and the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Middle-Aged and Older U.S. Women. Diabetes Care 2005, 28, 1438–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Barbagallo, M. Role of Magnesium in Insulin Action, Diabetes and Cardio-Metabolic Syndrome X. Mol. Aspects Med. 2003, 24, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Akyüz, O.; Gücün, M.; Demirci, R.; Celik, M. Relationship Between Serum Magnesium Level and Insulin Resistance in Turkey Non-Obese Adult Population. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 3070–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Rotariu, D.; Babes, E.E.; Tit, D.M.; Moisi, M.; Bustea, C.; Stoicescu, M.; Radu, A.-F.; Vesa, C.M.; Behl, T.; Bungau, A.F.; et al. Oxidative stress—Complex pathological issues concerning the hallmark of cardiovascular and metabolic disorders. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 152, 113238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Guerrero-Romero, F.; Jaquez-Chairez, F.O.; Rodríguez-Morán, M. Magnesium in Metabolic Syndrome: A Review Based on Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trials. Magnes. Res. 2016, 29, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lopez-Ridaura, R.; Willett, W.C.; Rimm, E.B.; Liu, S.; Stampfer, M.J.; Manson, J.E.; Hu, F.B. Magnesium Intake and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Men and Women. Diabetes Care 2004, 27, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Song, Y.; Manson, J.E.; Buring, J.E.; Liu, S. Dietary Magnesium Intake in Relation to Plasma Insulin Levels and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Women. Diabetes Care 2004, 27, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. DiNicolantonio, J.J.; O’Keefe, J.H.; Wilson, W. Subclinical Magnesium Deficiency: A Principal Driver of Cardiovascular Disease and a Public Health Crisis. Open Heart 2018, 5, e000668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Barbagallo, M.; Dominguez, L.J. Magnesium Metabolism in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Metabolic Syndrome and Insulin Resistance. Highlight Issue Cell. Regul. Magnes. 2007, 458, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Maier, J.A.; Castiglioni, S.; Locatelli, L.; Zocchi, M.; Mazur, A. Magnesium and inflammation: Advances and perspectives. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 115, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ridker, P.; Buring, J.; Cook, N.; Rifai, N. C-Reactive Protein, the Metabolic Syndrome, and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Events. An 8-year Follow-Up of 14,719 Initially Healthy American Women. Circulation 2003, 12, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Cruz, K.J.C.; de Oliveira, A.R.S.; Pinto, D.P.; Morais, J.B.S.; da Silva Lima, F.; Colli, C.; Torres-Leal, F.L.; do Nascimento Marreiro, D. Influence of Magnesium on Insulin Resistance in Obese Women. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2014, 160, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Farshidi, H.; Sobhani, A.R.; Eslami, M.; Azarkish, F.; Eftekhar, E.; Keshavarz, M.; Soltani, N. Magnesium Sulfate Administration in Moderate Coronary Artery Disease Patients Improves Atherosclerotic Risk Factors: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial Study. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2020, 76, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Fung, T.T.; Manson, J.E.; Solomon, C.G.; Liu, S.; Willett, W.C.; Hu, F.B. The Association between Magnesium Intake and Fasting Insulin Concentration in Healthy Middle-Aged Women. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2003, 22, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Veronese, N.; Pizzol, D.; Smith, L.; Dominguez, L.J.; Barbagallo, M. Effect of Magnesium Supplementation on Inflammatory Parameters: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients 2022, 14, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Zheltova, A.A.; Kharitonova, M.V.; Iezhitsa, I.N.; Spasov, A.A. Magnesium Deficiency and Oxidative Stress: An Update. BioMedicine 2016, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Larsson, S.C.; Burgess, S.; Michaëlsson, K. Serum Magnesium Levels and Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: Mendelian Randomisation Study. BMC Med. 2018, 16, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Joris, P.; Plat, J.; Bakker, S.; Mensink, R. Long-Term Magnesium Supplementation Improves Arterial Stiffness in Overweight and Obese Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Intervention Study. Atherosclerosis 2016, 252, e90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Song, Y.; He, K.; Levitan, E.B.; Manson, J.E.; Liu, S. Effects of Oral Magnesium Supplementation on Glycaemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trials. Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2006, 23, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Simental-Mendía, L.; Sahebkar, A.; Rodríguez-Morán, M.; Guerrero-Romero, F. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effects of Magnesium Supplementation on Insulin Sensitivity and Glucose Control. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 111, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Lee, H.; Ghimire, S.; Kim, E. Magnesium Supplementation Reduces Postoperative Arrhythmias After Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Pediatrics: A Metaanalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2013, 34, 1396–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Rosanoff, A.; Seelig, M. Comparison of Mechanism and Functional Effects of Magnesium and Statin Pharmaceuticals. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2004, 23, 501S–505S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Oliveira, A.R.; Cruz, K.; Severo, J.; Morais, J.; Freitas, T.; Araújo, R.; Marreiro, D. Hypomagnesemia and Its Relation with Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation in Obesity. Rev. Assoc. Médica Bras. 2017, 63, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Randell, E.W.; Mathews, M.; Gadag, V.; Zhang, H.; Sun, G. Relationship between Serum Magnesium Values, Lipids and Anthropometric Risk Factors. Atherosclerosis 2008, 196, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Jamilian, M.; Samimi, M.; Faraneh, A.E.; Aghadavod, E.; Shahrzad, H.D.; Chamani, M.; Mafi, A.; Asemi, Z. Magnesium Supplementation Affects Gene Expression Related to Insulin and Lipid in Patients with Gestational Diabetes. Magnes. Res. 2017, 30, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ahmadian, M.; Suh, J.M.; Hah, N.; Liddle, C.; Atkins, A.; Downes, M.; Evans, R. PPARγ Signaling and Metabolism: The Good, the Bad and the Future. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Altura, B.; Shah, N.; Li, Z.; Jiang, X.-C.; Perez-Albela, J.; Altura, B.T. Magnesium Deficiency Upregulates Serine Palmitoyl Transferase (SPT 1 and SPT 2) in Cardiovascular Tissues: Relationship to Serum Ionized Mg and Cytochrome c. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2010, 299, H932–H938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Salehidoost, R.; Taghipour Boroujeni, G.; Feizi, A.; Aminorroaya, A.; Amini, M. Effect of Oral Magnesium Supplement on Cardiometabolic Markers in People with Prediabetes: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Ham, J.Y.; Shon, Y.H. Natural Magnesium-Enriched Deep-Sea Water Improves Insulin Resistance and the Lipid Profile of Prediabetic Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Crossover Trial. Nutrients 2020, 12, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  163. Guerrero-Romero, F.; Rodríguez-Morán, M. Hypomagnesemia Is Linked to Low Serum HDL-Cholesterol Irrespective of Serum Glucose Values. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2000, 14, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Shahbah, D.; Naga, A.; Hassan, T.; Zakaria, M.; Beshir, M.; El-Morshedy, S.E.; Abdalhady, M.; Kamel, E.; Rahman, D.; Kamel, L.; et al. Status of Serum Magnesium in Egyptian Children with Type 1 Diabetes and Its Correlation to Glycemic Control and Lipid Profile. Medicine 2016, 95, e5166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Mishra, S.; Padmanaban, P.; Deepti, G.; Sarkar, G.; Sumathi, S.; Toora, B. Serum Magnesium and Dyslipidemia in Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus. Biomed. Res. 2011, 23, 295–300. [Google Scholar]
  166. Mahalle, N.; Kulkarni, M.; Naik, S. Is Hypomagnesaemia a Coronary Risk Factor among Indians with Coronary Artery Disease? J. Cardiovasc. Dis. Res. 2012, 3, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Asbaghi, O.; Moradi, S.; Nezamoleslami, S.; Moosavian, S.P.; ali Hojjati Kermani, M.; Lazaridi, A.V.; Miraghajani, M. The Effects of Magnesium Supplementation on Lipid Profile Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 861–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Yu, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Li, S.; Zhang, Q.; Xiao, P.; Wang, K.; Zhuang, M.; Jiang, Y. Association between Serum Magnesium and Blood Lipids: Influence of Type 2 Diabetes and Central Obesity. Br. J. Nutr. 2018, 120, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  169. Hyun, M.H.; Lee, Y.; Choi, B.G.; Na, J.O.; Choi, C.U.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, E.J.; Rha, S.W.; Park, C.G.; Lee, E.; et al. Roles of Achieved Levels of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein on Cardiovascular Outcome in Statin Therapy. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2019, 2019, 3824823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Pinal-Fernandez, I.; Casal-Dominguez, M.; Mammen, A.L. Statins: Pros and cons. Med. Clin. 2018, 150, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Ibrahim, S.; Udupi, A.; Rebeiro, C.; Bolar Suryakanth, V.; Kamath, A.; Panduranga Shenoy, R. Association of Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol and Its Small, Dense Phenotype with Six-Month Cardiovascular Morbidity. Rep. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2022, 11, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Rosanoff, A. Magnesium and hypertension. Clin. Calcium 2005, 15, 255–260. [Google Scholar]
  173. El-Haggar Sahar, M.; Mostafa Tarek, M. Role of Magnesium Supplement on Hyperlipidemia and L-CAT Level in Patient on Atorvastatin Therapy. Br. J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 4, 1521–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Theofilis, P.; Sagris, M.; Oikonomou, E.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Siasos, G.; Tsioufis, C.; Tousoulis, D. Inflammatory Mechanisms Contributing to Endothelial Dysfunction. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Nesto, R.W. Beyond low-density lipoprotein: Addressing the atherogenic lipid triad in type 2 diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs 2005, 5, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Jin, S.; Liu, J.; Jia, Y.; Han, T.; Zhao, X.; Sun, C.; Na, L. The association of dietary flavonoids, magnesium and their interactions with the metabolic syndrome in Chinese adults: A prospective cohort study. Br. J. Nutr. 2021, 126, 892–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Yang, N.; He, L.; Li, Y.; Xu, L.; Ping, F.; Li, W.; Zhang, H. Reduced Insulin Resistance Partly Mediated the Association of High Dietary Magnesium Intake with Less Metabolic Syndrome in a Large Chinese Population. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2020, 13, 2541–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Yamori, Y.; Sagara, M.; Mizushima, S.; Liu, L.; Ikeda, K.; Nara, Y. An inverse association between magnesium in 24-h urine and cardiovascular risk factors in middle-aged subjects in 50 CARDIAC Study populations. Hypertens. Res. 2015, 38, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Dibaba, D.T.; Chen, C.; Lu, L.; Bidulescu, A.; Fly, A.D.; Xun, P.; Judd, S.E.; Cushman, M.; Kahe, K. Magnesium intake is inversely associated with the risk of metabolic syndrome in the Reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke (REGARDS) cohort study. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 2337–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Studies identified via databases and registers.
Figure 1. Studies identified via databases and registers.
Cimb 45 00205 g001
Figure 2. Cholesterol circuit: synthesis, its transport from the peripheral tissues to the liver, and its absorption at the level of intestinal epithelial cells. Abbreviation: ABCA1 = ATP-binding cassette transporter A1; Acetyl-CoA = Acetyl Coenzyme A; Apo = apolipoprotein; ApoA-I = Apolipoprotein A-I; ApoA-II = Apolipoprotein A-II; ApoC-I = Apolipoprotein C-I; ApoC-II = Apolipoprotein C-II; ApoC-III = Apolipoprotein C-III; CE = cholesteryl ester; CETP = cholesteryl ester transfer protein; FFA = free fatty acid; HL = hepatic lipase; HMG-CoA = 3-hydroxy 3-metylglutaryl coenzyme A; IDL = intermediate-density lipoprotein; LCAT = lecithin–cholesterol acyl transferase; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LPL = lipoprotein lipase. Mg2+ = magnesium ions; PLTP = phospholipid transfer protein; TG = triglyceride; VLDL = very LDL.
Figure 2. Cholesterol circuit: synthesis, its transport from the peripheral tissues to the liver, and its absorption at the level of intestinal epithelial cells. Abbreviation: ABCA1 = ATP-binding cassette transporter A1; Acetyl-CoA = Acetyl Coenzyme A; Apo = apolipoprotein; ApoA-I = Apolipoprotein A-I; ApoA-II = Apolipoprotein A-II; ApoC-I = Apolipoprotein C-I; ApoC-II = Apolipoprotein C-II; ApoC-III = Apolipoprotein C-III; CE = cholesteryl ester; CETP = cholesteryl ester transfer protein; FFA = free fatty acid; HL = hepatic lipase; HMG-CoA = 3-hydroxy 3-metylglutaryl coenzyme A; IDL = intermediate-density lipoprotein; LCAT = lecithin–cholesterol acyl transferase; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LPL = lipoprotein lipase. Mg2+ = magnesium ions; PLTP = phospholipid transfer protein; TG = triglyceride; VLDL = very LDL.
Cimb 45 00205 g002
Figure 3. Pathologies connected to/or increasded by chronic magnesium deficiency.
Figure 3. Pathologies connected to/or increasded by chronic magnesium deficiency.
Cimb 45 00205 g003
Table 1. Enzymes involved in plasma lipoprotein metabolism.
Table 1. Enzymes involved in plasma lipoprotein metabolism.
ApolipoproteinLipoprotein AssociationFunctionReferences
ApoA-IHDLTriggers LCAT; controls ABC transporter[13,14,15,16,17]
ApoA-IIHDLStructural protein for HDL, Activates hepatic lipase[14,18,19]
ApoA-IVChylomicrons, HDLUnknown[14,19,20,21,22]
ApoB-48ChylomicronsStructural protein for chylomicrons[13,14,15,16,17]
ApoB-100VLDL, LDLBinds to LDL receptor[17,18]
ApoC-IVLDL, LDLActivates LCAT[14]
ApoC-IIChylomicrons, VLDL, LDLActivates lipoprotein lipase[13,14,15]
Apo C-IIIChylomicrons, VLDL, LDLInhibits lipoprotein lipase[13,15,18]
ApoDHDLUnknown (has been proposed to play a role in stabilizing LCAT and increasing cholesterol esterification)[14]
ApoEChylomicrons, VLDL, LDLTriggers clearance of VLDL and chylomicron remnants[13,14,15,22]
Table 2. Causes of magnesium deficiency.
Table 2. Causes of magnesium deficiency.
Causes of Magnesium Deficiency
Insufficient intake
A diet low in Magnesium [102,105]
Slimming cures [102,106]
Intensification of losses
At the gastrointestinal level: vomiting; purgatives/laxatives; trailing diarrhea [103,107,108]
By the renal route: nephropathies; diuretics; chronic alcoholism; diabetes [104,109,110,111,112,113,114,115]
Decreased intestinal absorption
Conditions after intestinal resection [103,116]
Diarrhea [103,107,108]
Malabsorption [103,107,108,117]
Chron’s disease [103,108,117]
Ulcerative colitis [103,117]
Coeliac disease [103,107]
Stressing Factors
Pregnancy [32,34,102,118,119]
Lactation [32,34,102,118,119]
The growing period [102,120]
Sport performance [102,121,122,123]
Old age [103,107,109,119,124,125]
Convalescence [86,87,102]
Endocrine disorders
Hyperthyroidism [104,126,127]
Aldosteronism [104,126,127]
Hyperparathyroidism [104,126,127,128]
Poorly controlled diabetes [104,109,129]
Interference of absorption
Increased calcium intake [102,117,128]
Hyper protein diet [102,108]
Lipid foods [102,128,130,131]
Excessive alcohol consumption [102,119,132]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nartea, R.; Mitoiu, B.I.; Ghiorghiu, I. The Link between Magnesium Supplements and Statin Medication in Dyslipidemic Patients. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 3146-3167. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45040205

AMA Style

Nartea R, Mitoiu BI, Ghiorghiu I. The Link between Magnesium Supplements and Statin Medication in Dyslipidemic Patients. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2023; 45(4):3146-3167. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45040205

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nartea, Roxana, Brindusa Ilinca Mitoiu, and Ioana Ghiorghiu. 2023. "The Link between Magnesium Supplements and Statin Medication in Dyslipidemic Patients" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 45, no. 4: 3146-3167. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45040205

APA Style

Nartea, R., Mitoiu, B. I., & Ghiorghiu, I. (2023). The Link between Magnesium Supplements and Statin Medication in Dyslipidemic Patients. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 45(4), 3146-3167. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45040205

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop