Next Article in Journal
Irritable Bowel Syndrome between Molecular Approach and Clinical Expertise—Searching for Gap Fillers in the Oxidative Stress Way of Thinking
Previous Article in Journal
A Pilot Study of Circulating Monocyte Subsets in Patients Treated with Stem Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Hematological Malignancies
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix—Single-Center Study Over a 10-Year Period

by Angel Yordanov 1,*, Martin Karamanliev 2, Latchezar Tantchev 3, Assia Konsoulova 4, Strahil Strashilov 5 and Mariela Vasileva-Slaveva 6,7,8
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 21 December 2019 / Revised: 14 January 2020 / Accepted: 15 January 2020 / Published: 18 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics and Gynecology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Definitions and illustrations not clear.

Needs significant language corrections for greater clarity.

Details are in notes in uploaded reviewed manuscript.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Angel Yordanov and colleagues investigated Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the uterine cervix - Single-center study over a 10-year period. The postoperative evolution of this tumor and the potentially poorer prognosis may indicate an intensification of the follow-up. The objective of this study was to analyse the frequency of mucoepidermoid carcinoma in hospitalized women with cervical cancer, clinical characteristics and prognosis. This data didn’t confirm its worse prognosis than previous reports. This report has a small number of cases compared to the previous reports. However, this paper is the greatest contribution to rare tumor of uterine cervix.

Minor comments:

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the uterine cervix is very rare tumor and pathological diagnosis is important.

The authors should include criteria for pathological diagnosis for Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the uterine cervix in “Material and Methods”. If necessary, the author should add typical photographs of histopathology (HE stains and immunohistochemical stains of tumor).

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop