Next Article in Journal
Parenchyma-Sparing Liver Resection or Regenerative Liver Surgery: Which Way to Go?
Next Article in Special Issue
BRCA1/2 Reversion Mutations in Patients Treated with Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitors or Platinum Agents
Previous Article in Journal
The Implication of Misinformation and Stigma in Age-Related Quality of Life, Depression, and Coping Mechanisms of Adult Patients with Psoriasis
Previous Article in Special Issue
How Genetics and Genomics Advances Are Rewriting Pediatric Cancer Research and Clinical Care
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Combination of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and Oral Steroids for the Treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Early or Late?

Medicina 2022, 58(10), 1421; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101421
by Matteo Cavaliere 1, Pietro De Luca 1, Alfonso Scarpa 1,*, Adriano Maciej Strzalkowski 1, Massimo Ralli 2, Matteo Calvanese 1, Luisa Savignano 1, Pasquale Viola 3, Claudia Cassandro 4, Giuseppe Chiarella 3 and Arianna Di Stadio 5
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Medicina 2022, 58(10), 1421; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101421
Submission received: 5 September 2022 / Revised: 2 October 2022 / Accepted: 7 October 2022 / Published: 10 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Cavaliere and colleagues investigated and compared the effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), oral steroids (OS) and combination of both therapies (HBOT + OS) on the sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). The authors clearly showed that the HBOT or the combination has a better treatment outcome than OS, and HBOT+OS combination should be considered as the first line treatment for SSNHL whenever possible. This is a very neat study and should be valuable for developing a standard for treatment of SSNHL. I only a few minor points below.

1.      Line 32, “Combination ofHBOT and OS…” should be “Combination of HBOT and OS…”

2.      Line 57, There should be a space between (HBOT) and [8]

3.      Line 128, The sentence can be revised to “Group HBOT (A) and group OS (B) included 60 and 55 patients, respectively, and group HBOT + 128 OS (C) was consisted of 56 patients (Table 1)”

4.      Line 177, should be p=0.08

5.      Line 193, should be <50 years old

6.      Line 206 and 207, the “thera-py.” should be deleted.

7.      It would be nice to give a little explanation/definition about downsloping/upsloping type in the first place.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

Title - Clearly defines the work.

Abstract - It is well elaborated, succinct and summarizes the article.

Introduction - It is appropriate to the topic

Materials and methods - Clearly explains the methodology used, characterizes the sample of participants.

Comment/suggestion for future work: Some of these patients who recover hearing thresholds have complaints of difficulty in understanding speech, so the work could have been more valued if vocal audiometry and otoacoustic emissions had been included in the two assessment times (T0) and (T1).

 

Data analysis - the statistical methodology used for the evaluation/comparison of the results obtained in the different evaluation conditions was clearly explained.

Discussion - Performed in a clear and enlightening way, demonstrating the benefits of using this treatment, the benefit to use the combination of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and oral steroids in early and late treatment. The study presents the influence of age on the effectiveness of treatment and the influence of gender on the results obtained, and the benefit of early start of treatment.

References - The list of references is adequate, although a little old (in 35 references only one work from 2019 and another from 2020 appears)

Graphs, figures and tables - They are very didactic and complement the written text.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop