Next Article in Journal
The Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: An Evidence-Based Approach from the Diagnosis to the Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspensory Fixation Results in Greater Tibial Tunnel Widening Compared to Interference Screw Fixation in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Tetrandrine Treatment May Improve Clinical Outcome in Patients with COVID-19

Medicina 2022, 58(9), 1194; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091194
by Shiyin Chen 1,†, Yiran Liu 2,†, Juan Ge 3,†, Jianzhong Yin 4, Ting Shi 4, James Ntambara 2, Zhounan Cheng 2, Minjie Chu 2,* and Hongyan Gu 3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Medicina 2022, 58(9), 1194; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58091194
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 23 August 2022 / Accepted: 27 August 2022 / Published: 1 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Emergency Medicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

Dear Editor,

After reading this manuscript, I agree that the language of the manuscript is good. I also have several questions, as shown below:

1. The authors only wrote a Hubei hospital. This should be clearly presented. Which is the accurate hospital for performing this experiment?

2. The data is not enough, either indexes or time lengths for administration of the medicines. The manuscript generally lacks broadness and depth.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1| L. 60-61. Statisctical data should be updated, e.g. for August, 1 , 2022.

2| Provide briefly data concerning origin and chemical structure of tetrandrine

3| Doses, mode and duration of administration of tetrandrine or their ranges should be mentioned. Also authors should clarify whether tetrandrine comprises the total extract of the herb or an individual compound

 

4| Captures for the fig. 2 and 3 should contain definition for the abbreviation TET

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors made adequate revisions and I recommend its publication in Medicine.

Reviewer 2 Report

As a reviewer of the manuscript, I am satisfied by all proposed corrections made by the authors in the updated version.

Back to TopTop