Next Article in Journal
The Efficacy of Immunotherapy and Clinical Utility of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of Head and Neck
Previous Article in Journal
Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) Boosts Antibody Levels to SARS-CoV-2 in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis: A Single-Center Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

The Management and Diagnosis of Anti-NMDA Receptor Autoimmune Encephalitis in Pregnant Women: A Case Report and Literature Review

by
Alina Potorac
1,
Valentin Nicolae Varlas
2,3,*,
Roxana Georgiana Borș
1,
Alexandru Baroș
2,4 and
Monica Cirstoiu
2,4
1
Doctoral School, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, 011132 Bucharest, Romania
4
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Emergency Hospital, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2023, 59(12), 2110; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59122110
Submission received: 25 October 2023 / Revised: 23 November 2023 / Accepted: 27 November 2023 / Published: 1 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics and Gynecology)

Abstract

:
Rationale: Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a form of autoimmune synaptic encephalitis, often mediated by neuronal surface antibodies. Clinically, it manifests through a diverse range of neurological and psychiatric symptoms, primarily affecting young women with ovarian teratoma, which is rare in pregnant women. Patient concerns: We report a case of a 35-year-old multiparous pregnant patient at 38 weeks of gestation presented to the emergency room with seizure, psychiatric symptoms like delirious speech with mystical visual and auditory hallucinations, bradylalia, and retrograde amnesia. Diagnosis: The diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis with anti-NMDA antibodies was concluded by considering the lumbar puncture results, brain imaging, and the patient’s persistent symptoms. Outcomes: This case is noteworthy for its rarity and the symptoms’ breadth. At 38 weeks of gestation, the patient underwent a cesarean section, resulting in excellent maternal recovery observed during the 6-month follow-up and good neonatal adaptation. Lessons: Our goals include raising awareness about this condition and emphasizing the significance of early diagnosis. This encephalitis is treatable and potentially reversible, underscoring the importance of prompt identification.

1. Introduction

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) includes various groups of autoimmune afflictions that involve the central nervous system (CNS), and the diagnosis is made based on Grau’s criteria [1]. Previous diagnostic criteria of encephalitis typically required an altered mental state and evidence of inflammation. However, AE can deviate from these, with patients lacking consciousness issues, fever, or abnormal cerebrospinal fluid results. Neuroimaging may be normal, and antibody testing results may take weeks. Non-antibody-dependent clinical criteria were developed to aid swift diagnosis and immunotherapy initiation in suspected cases, excluding other potential causes. The diagnostic criteria for anti-NMDAR encephalitis divide cases into two categories, “Probable” and “Definite,” based on specific clinical and laboratory parameters. In the “Probable” category, a rapid onset (within 3 months) of at least four major symptom groups, including abnormal behavior, speech dysfunction, movement disorder, decreased consciousness, and autonomic dysfunction, is required.
Additionally, abnormal laboratory test results and the reasonable exclusion of other disorders are necessary. Diagnosis in this category is also possible if three symptom groups are present along with a systemic teratoma. In the “Definite” category, the presence of one or more major symptom groups, along with IgG anti-GluN1 antibodies, confirms the diagnosis after reasonably excluding other disorders. Confirmation tests, including live immunohistochemistry or cell-based assays, should be conducted on neurons or tissue, particularly when only serum is available. AE is often a paraneoplastic syndrome associated with ovarian, testicular, lung, breast, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma [2].
Autoimmune encephalitis with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors is a seldom-seen yet severe disorder affecting the CNS. It triggers inflammation within the brain and spinal cord, brought on by an abnormal immune response where antibodies target NMDA receptors, the N1 subunit, and crucial proteins for nerve cell functionality, with a variety of major neurological symptoms, like memory loss, dyskinesias, dysautonomia, confusion, hallucinations, seizures, central hypoventilation, and decreased level of consciousness [3]. Managing autoimmune encephalitis with NMDA receptors during pregnancy is intricate, necessitating a delicate balance between the mother’s treatment and the safety of the fetus. Anti-NMDAR autoimmune encephalitis is a severe affliction but treatable, with more than 60% of cases in young women. Numerous studies have indicated complications in pregnant patients, such as dysautonomia, seizures, or central hypoventilation. Additionally, evidence suggests that the transplacental transfer of NMDAR antibodies may lead to acute encephalopathy, or even prove fatal for newborns, potentially contributing to the development of autistic spectrum disorders in the long term [4,5]. This condition was described for the first time in 2005 in young patients with ovarian teratoma [6].
When addressing this condition, the healthcare provider must carefully consider the potential harmful effects of treatments on the fetus, weighing them against the benefits for the mother. This balance is particularly crucial during the first trimester of pregnancy. The administration of anti-seizure medications (such as carbamazepine and phenytoin), immunomodulatory drugs (such as cyclophosphamide), or performing radiological assessments to identify underlying neoplasia (such as abdominal and pelvic computed tomography with contrast enhancement for ovarian teratoma) during this period is associated with an elevated risk of congenital malformations, such as spina bifida and cardiac anomalies, as well as newborn distress [7].
In the following case study, we present the situation of a young woman diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis during the third trimester of pregnancy. Our objectives are to emphasize the positive outcomes for the mother, and raise awareness about this condition and the significance of early diagnosis. This encephalitis is treatable and potentially reversible, underscoring the importance of prompt identification. Additionally, we aim to educate gynecologists, psychiatrists, anesthetists, and neurologists about this potential cause of psychiatric and neurological symptoms during pregnancy.

2. Case Report

A 35-year-old multiparous pregnant patient at 38 weeks of gestation presented to the emergency room following a spontaneous fall from the bed while she was admitted to another medical facility, experiencing a loss of consciousness for 10 min and lower limb myoclonus, followed by psychomotor agitation, delirious speech with mystical visual and auditory hallucinations, bradylalia, and retrograde amnesia. There were no prodromal symptoms of encephalitis. Her medical history shows that the patient has genetic thrombophilia (heterozygous variants of MTHFR). Regarding hereditary antecedents, there are no known autoimmune diseases.
After admission, a neurology consultation was performed. At the time of the consultation, the patient did not exhibit signs of meningeal irritation, had preserved oculomotor function without nystagmus, and showed no coordination or sensory disturbances. She had slow speech (bradylalia) and experienced episodes of visual and auditory hallucinations with a mystical character. A psychiatric consultation was also conducted, raising the suspicion of schizophrenia. As a result, treatment with carbamazepine 400 mg/day, lorazepam 2 mg/day, diazepam, and haloperidol 50 mg/day was initiated. An emergency native cerebral CT was performed, yielding normal results, followed by a cerebral MRI that identified changes in the temporo-occipital cortex, with more pronounced asymmetry on the coronal FLAIR sequence. It also showed water restriction on the diffusion-weighted sequence, indicating a non-specific MRI appearance, possibly in the context of recent diffuse axonal injuries. On the native cerebral MRI, a “swollen” appearance of the right temporo-occipital cortex was observed, showing hyperintensity on the T2 and FLAIR sequences without corresponding findings on the diffusion-weighted or T2 sequences. This was associated with the moderate effacement of the intergyral sulci, raising the suspicion of temporo-parietal cortical edema. Three-dimensional Time-of-Flight (TOF) MR angiography revealed the main intracranial arteries to have rapid flow, normal morphology, and a normally positioned and sized ventricular system (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
On the same day, after admission to the Obstetrics–Gynecology Department, the decision was made to perform a cesarean section to enable the initiation of psychiatric treatment contraindicated during pregnancy and to continue further imaging investigations for establishing the diagnosis and planning subsequent management. The newborn weighed 3050 g and suffered transient respiratory distress, with Apgar 8 at 1 min and 9 at 5 min. Postoperatively, the patient was admitted for two days to the intensive care unit for monitoring and advanced support.
After being transferred back to the Obstetrics–Gynecology Department, considering the symptoms, treatment with carbamazepine 400 mg/day, lorazepam 2 mg/day, diazepam, and haloperidol 50 mg/day was initiated, without any response. Following a subsequent neurological consultation, the suspicion of viral encephalitis arose, and empirical treatment was initiated with acyclovir 1000 mg iv every 8 h, ceftriaxone 2 g iv every 12 h, and methylprednisolone 1 g/day iv; the psychiatric treatment continued with olanzapine, diazepam, carbamazepine, and haloperidol, as needed. The long-term video electrocardiogram (video-EEG) provided a recording without epileptic discharges, generalized slowing activity, or delta waves.
A lumbar puncture was performed on the fourth postoperative day. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed 29 white cells per mm3 (85.3% lymphocytes), 49 mg/dL glucose, 32.52 mg/dL proteins, positive oligoclonal bands, antineuronal antibodies, and anti-Ri weakly positive and positive antibodies against NMDA glutamate receptors (Table 1), with no organisms on the Gram stain, negative CSF cultures, and, on the Ziehl–Neelsen stain, no acid-alcohol-resistant bacilli were detected.
Following the cerebrospinal fluid analysis and the positive results, due to the risk of a paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome, a thoracic-abdominal-pelvic CT scan with contrast was performed. The results revealed images of thrombi partially occupying the distal portion of the right pulmonary artery, with extension into the lower lobe, and a quasi-occlusive thrombosis involving the left common iliac vein, the external iliac vein up to the level of the left femoral vein and deep inguinal vein, without the presence of a teratoma or lung cancer.
Considering the results of the lumbar puncture, brain imaging, and the patient’s persistent symptoms, the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis with anti-NMDA antibodies was concluded. Treatment continued with methylprednisolone without a favorable response, followed by one course of cyclophosphamide without clinical improvement. Subsequently, one course of Rituximab was administered, with a progressive improvement in neurological symptoms, enhancement of delirious episodes, and no neurological signs of focal deficits. The IV Ig treatment was not initiated due to the lack of resources at that time.
The second native brain MRI and IV post-contrast were performed 12 days after the first MRI, and, when compared with the previous examination, they highlighted the following:
-
a slight regression in the size and intensity of the T2 and FLAIR hyper signal, without restrictions on the diffusion sequence, not capturing the right temporo-occipital, associating a “swollen” aspect of the cortex with a slight erasure of the intergyral grooves, but without a mass effect on median line structures;
-
small non-specific demyelinating lesions in hyper signal T2 and FLAIR, 2–4 mm, without diffusion sequence restriction, non-capturing, located in the frontoparietal subcortical and bilateral periventricular;
-
no restrictions on the diffusion sequence, no hemorrhagic stigmata visible on the T2* sequence, no pathological intra/extra neuraxial contrast uptake or at the leptomeningeal level;
-
normally positioned and sized ventricular system.
At the 6-month follow-up, the patient showed no pathological changes in paraclinical examinations, and a thoracic-abdominal-pelvic CT scan with contrast was performed, excluding any neoplastic pathology at that moment associated with autoimmune encephalitis. The permeabilization of the pulmonary artery trunks was also noted. It was decided to stop immunosuppressive therapy due to the favorable progression and complete resolution of symptoms, and to continue the follow-up, considering the possibility of an occult or a developing neoplasm.

3. Discussion

Anti-NMDAR encephalitis is an autoimmune condition characterized by organ and tissue damage caused by antibodies or T cells; few cases are described in the literature (Table 2). Currently, although the precise underlying pathogenesis of this disorder remains incompletely elucidated, an increasing body of evidence suggests that antibodies developed in response to various potential triggers (such as tumors or infections) likely cross-react with synaptic proteins, with the NMDAR being the most commonly affected [8]. Research indicates that its origins may be linked to the immune regulation of sex hormones [9], genetic factors from X and Y chromosomes, specific immune responses related to pregnancy, and a combination of genetic and environmental influences [10].
Estrogen and progesterone levels fluctuate throughout pregnancy, with estrogen stimulating B cell survival and antibody production while inhibiting T cell expansion, potentially exacerbating autoimmune disorders. The intricate immune response of a mother to the fetus, perceived as a “half-self, half-non-self” antigen, increases the susceptibility to autoimmune diseases [8,11]. In the case presented, from the clinical and paraclinical investigations, and the complete resolution of symptoms at the 6-month follow-up, it was concluded that it was not a paraneoplastic syndrome but rather an immune response related to pregnancy and external factors.
The underlying causes of anti-NMDAR encephalitis during pregnancy have not been fully elucidated. A characteristic of this condition is its higher prevalence among women of reproductive age, often coinciding with ovarian teratomas. We can speculate that there might be a connection between pregnant patients predisposed to anti-NMDAR encephalitis and the presence of ovarian teratomas [12,13,14]. In our case, after confirming the diagnosis, transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasounds and abdominal CT scans (after the cesarean section delivery) were performed, revealing the absence of any teratoma. Furthermore, only 10 out of 30 (33.3%) cases studied in the literature presented a teratoma.
Lim et al., in their study conducted in Korea, found that the predominant symptoms among patients were psychiatric (68.8%), with epileptic seizures following closely at 50.0% [15]. In our case, the patient experienced a single epileptic seizure at the onset of the disease. In the literature review, only 36.6% of patients presented seizures (Table 2).
Table 2. A literature review of cases of anti-NMDAR autoimmune encephalitis during gestation.
Table 2. A literature review of cases of anti-NMDAR autoimmune encephalitis during gestation.
Author/
Year
AgePresenting
Symptoms
GA (wks)TeratomaTreatmentHistory of Autoimmune DisordersImaging to
Exclude Teratoma
Mother’s Outcome Perinatal OutcomesFollow-Up
Kumar
Ref. [16], 2010
19Headache followed by behavior abnormalities 14PresentIV Ig, IV methyl-prednisolone, resection of teratomaNSMRI—left teratomaNormalNormal2 m
Kumar
Ref. [16], 2010
20Behavior abnormalities8 AbsentIV IgBilateral teratoma removed at 16 yCT (bilateral teratoma)Minimal deficits AbortedNS
Kumar
Ref. [16], 2010
19Behavior abnormalities17AbsentIV methylprednisoloneNSMRI/USNormalNormalNS
Ito
Ref. [17], 2010
19Dyskinesia, behavior abnormalities 17AbsentCorticosteroidsNo historyMRI/USNormalNormalNS
McCarthy Ref. [18], 201232Behavior
abnormalities, autonomic symptoms
8PresentIV methylprednisolone, plasmapheresis, resection of teratomaNSMRI/US-negative for teratoma; left teratoma at C-sectionNormalNormalNS
Jagota
Ref. [19], 2014
18Fever, orolingual movements, eye
deviation
9AbsentAzathioprine,
IV Ig
NSMRI/CTThe patient died due to sepsis. Baby survived, delivered at 34 wks (NVD)Baby follow-up 3 y; the patient died
Shanani
Ref. [20], 2015
26Behavioral abnormalities and headache22AbsentOral corticosteroids, IV methylprednisolone, plasmapheresisNSUSNormalNormal18 m
Kim
Ref. [3], 2015
28Abnormal behavior, an epileptic seizure, hypoventilation, and dyskinesia 7PresentIV Ig, IV methyl-prednisolone; oral corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, resection of teratomaNSUS negative, CT—right ovarian teratomaSlight cognitive function deficitsAborted12 m
Mathis
Ref. [21], 2015
21Behavior abnormalities10AbsentIV Ig, IV methyl-prednisolone NSMRISlight memory impairmentNormal9 m
Chan
Ref. [22], 2015
23Hallucinations, confusion, fever,
disinhibited
behavior
1st
trimester
PresentIV methylprednisolone, plasmapheresis, Rituximab, resection of teratoma NSCT—right ovarian teratomaNormalAborted18 m
Lamale-Smith
Ref. [23], 2015
24Confused, catatonia, disoriented20AbsentIV methylprednisolone
IV Ig
NSImaging (NS)—no teratomaDisinhibition, memory impairmentNormal12 m
Xiao
Ref. [24], 2017
24Visual and
auditory hallucinations
28AbsentIV Ig, IV methyl-prednisolone, bilateral ovarian wedge resection NSMRINormalNormal12 m
Keskin
Ref. [25], 2019
27Visual hallucination, headache, seizure18AbsentIV Ig, IV methyl-prednisolone, plasmapheresisNSUSDeathFetal demisePatient and baby died
Tailland
Ref. [26], 2020
37Orofacial dyskinesia, pyramidal bilateral syndrome18Absent
IV Ig, IV methyl-prednisoloneNSMRILeft hemiparesis, cognitive impairmentNormalNS
Jung
Ref. [27], 2020
28Focal seizure, depression, headache24AbsentIV Ig, IV methyl-prednisolone, oral corticosteroids,
Rituximab
NSUS/MRINormalNormal24 m
Joubert
Ref. [4], 2020
23Nausea, visual hallucination, delirium8PresentIV Ig, resection of teratomaNSNSNormal NormalNS
Joubert
Ref. [4], 2020
20Motor aphasia, behavior abnormalities, dysarthria12AbsentIV IgNSNSNormal NormalNS
Joubert
Ref. [4], 2020
25Behavior abnormalities and epilepsy5AbsentIV Ig, plasmapheresis, RituximabNSNSPoor responder NormalNS
Joubert
Ref. [4], 2020
31Cognitive fluctuation, orofacial dyskinesia, delirium, memory deficits20PresentIV Ig, Rituximab,
cyclophosphamide, resection of teratoma
NSNSPoor responderNormalNS
Joubert
Ref. [4], 2020
37Bulbar palsy and hemifacial sensitivity deficit 33AbsentIV Ig, cyclophosphamideNSNSNormalNormalNS
Joubert
Ref. [4], 2020
19Delirium, visual agitation, hallucination25PresentIV Ig, cyclophosphamide, resection of teratomaNSNSPoor responderNormalNS
Sperling
Ref. [28], 2021
34Seizures, uncontrolled laughing, emotional lability, short-term memory loss, head banging against the wall, insomnia14PresentIV Ig, IV methyl-prednisolone,
plasmapheresis
Rituximab, levetiracetam, Fosphenytoin, Valproate, resection of teratoma
NSMRI—right teratomaPoor memoryNormal6 m
Boniface
Ref. [29], 2021
22Hallucinations, nose-bleeds, nausea, vomiting, movements of the extremities, seizures23PresentPropofol, levetiracetam, acyclovir, ampicillin, vancomycin, ceftriaxone, resection of teratoma,
plasmapheresis
NSUS—right teratomaSignificant automatisms (orofacial and hand-jerking dyskinesias)Normal1 m
Liu
Ref. [8], 2021
(same case)
Third pregnancy

Fourth
pregnancy
19Lowered consciousness, restlessness, involuntary movement of the oral and facial muscles, and high muscle tension in the limbs8AbsentIV Ig, IV methyl-prednisolone,
Rituximab
NSUSNormalAborted12 m
21Similar psychiatric and epileptic symptoms10AbsentIV Ig, IV methyl-prednisolone,
levetiracetam,
olanzapine
NMDA encephalitis in the previous pregnancyUSPoor memory and mild cognitive impairmentAborted3 m
Reisz
Ref. [30], 2022
31Bizarre demeanor, alteration of cognitive status, mutism, catatonic-like status, epileptic seizures, choreoathetosis, autonomic disorders17AbsentPlasmapheresisNSMRISpastic paraparesis, peculiar childlike voice, immature behaviorAborted24 m
Dono
Ref. [31], 2022
29Continuous, ongoing, focal motor seizures involving the right side of the face, emotional liability with sudden changes in mood and behavior, sialorrhea7AbsentLacosamide,
prednisone, prednisolone, PLEX
NSMRI/USNormalNormal3 m
Fredrich
Ref. [32], 2022
19Seizures, psychotic behaviors, global hyperreflexia, left Babinski, continuous right upper extremity twitching, and oral automatisms11AbsentLacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, clonazepam,
IV Ig, IV Solumedrol,
PLEX
cyclophosphamide
Rituximab
NSNSFully ambulatory with mild cognitive deficitsNormal36 m
Scorrano
Ref. [33], 2022
29Tonic–clonic seizure, with minor head trauma and subacute onset of psychiatric symptoms6AbsentPrednisone, plasmapheresis, levetiracetam, lacosamideNSMRINSLow birth weight, respiratory distress, spina bifidaNS
Bansal
Ref. [34], 2023
36Aggressive, delirious, minimally directable, and with pressurized speech, impairment of insight and judgment, combative, hallucinating 17PresentLorazepam, diphenhydramin, haloperidol, ketamine, Risperidone,
IV Ig, resection of teratoma
NSUS—right teratomaNormalNormal1 m
Our case35Spontaneous fall, loss of consciousness for 10 min, lower limb myoclonus, retrograde amnesia, psychomotor agitation, delirious speech, mystical visual/ auditory hallucinations, bradylalia 38AbsentAcyclovir,
IV ceftriaxone,
IV methylprednisolone, olanzapine/carbamazepine, Rituximab
NSUS/CTNormalNormal6 m
GA—gestational age; IV Ig—intravenous immunoglobulin; IV—intravenous; PLEX—plasma exchange; min—minutes; wks—weeks; m—months; y—years, NS—non-specified.
The average age of the studied patients was 25.6 years (range 19–37), and the average gestational age was 15.5 weeks (range 5–33). According to the distribution by trimesters, the condition was encountered in the first trimester of pregnancy in 16 cases (53.33%), in the second trimester in 12 cases (40%), and in 2 cases in the third trimester (6.67%) at 28 weeks and 33 weeks. The case we presented is the only one diagnosed at term at 38 weeks.
In the case of most pregnant patients, immunomodulatory therapies include those recognized as primary treatment options, such as steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IV Ig), and plasma exchange. The findings reported in the existing literature affirm the generally well-tolerated nature of these treatments during pregnancy. Additionally, Rituximab, often considered a secondary line of treatment, has been limited to a small patient population but has shown favorable tolerance levels. Previous retrospective analyses and literature reviews that focused on pregnant individuals with autoimmune demyelinating disorders treated with Rituximab have not revealed any adverse effects on the patients or their newborns [35]. Immunomodulatory treatment involving systemic corticosteroids appears to be safe during pregnancy. Pregnant women undergoing corticosteroid therapy typically exhibit a minimal risk of experiencing significant congenital malformations. However, there is a possibility of premature rupture of amniotic membranes and the birth of low-weight babies [36].
Intravenous immunoglobulins are regarded as safe during pregnancy. Numerous reports in the obstetric literature detail the use of IV Ig therapy to address various conditions encountered during pregnancy [37]. Additionally, several case reports and series have demonstrated positive outcomes in pregnant patients with autoimmune epilepsies (AEs) treated with IV Ig, with a low incidence of side effects and infectious complications [31]. In our case, the treatment with corticosteroids and Rituximab was initiated after the cesarean section delivery, and plasma exchange (PLEX) was not required. The clinical response was positive, and the 6-month follow-up revealed a complete resolution of the symptoms (Table 2).
The lack of guidelines and the rare incidence of this condition explain the uneven therapeutic trials. From the analysis of the medication administered, it was observed that 21 cases were treated with IV Ig, 17 cases with IV methylprednisolone, 10 cases with plasmapheresis, and 4 cases with cyclophosphamide. As a result, dual IV Ig therapy, especially with IV methyl prednisolone, is the most effective.
The maternal prognosis was favorable in 14 cases (48.2%), with minimal/mild cognitive deficits in 4 cases (13.8%), and unfavorable / poor responders in 9 cases (31%). Two deaths (6.9%) were recorded. This information leads to the conclusion that anti-NMDA receptor autoimmune encephalitis continues to increase morbidity and mortality, and represents an element of differential diagnosis in medical practice.
The fetal prognosis was favorable in 22 (73.33%) cases, with abortions in 7 (23.33%) cases, and one death of the child at the age of 3 years. Regarding the follow-up, data were reported in 16 cases, the average being 13.47 months (1–36 months), which implies the need for the long-term monitoring of these children.
The limitation of this study is the search in a single database of cases with this condition. From the analysis of the studied cases, it can be seen that the diagnosis is difficult to achieve at the time of admission, requiring a series of additional laboratory and imaging analyses during which the treatment is non-specific. The strength of this study is represented by the rarity of the appearance of this pathology in the third trimester of pregnancy, more precisely, at term, because the vast majority of these cases are reported in the literature predominantly in the first two trimesters, which can make it difficult to establish the diagnosis and delays the initiation of treatment with repercussions on maternal prognosis.
To better decipher this pathology that occurs mainly in the first two trimesters of pregnancy, in 93.1% of the cases found in the literature, a multi-omics approach could be essential in understanding the etiology of this condition, the heterogeneous manifestation of the phenotype in the case of sexual chromosomal abnormalities, and for the development of therapeutic management adapted to each case.

4. Conclusions

Autoimmune encephalitis with NMDA receptors during pregnancy presents a complex medical challenge. Pregnancy serves as an inducer for anti-NMDAR encephalitis; moreover, the exclusion of a paraneoplastic syndrome is imperative, and also the rigorous follow-up, considering the possibility of an occult or a developing neoplasm. Early detection and suitable treatment, coupled with comprehensive medical and emotional support, significantly impact the lives of affected patients and their newborns. Collaboration among medical professionals is crucial in formulating a treatment plan that mitigates risks for both individuals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P. and M.C.; methodology, A.P.; software, A.B.; validation, M.C. and V.N.V.; formal analysis, V.N.V.; investigation, A.B.; resources, A.P.; data curation, R.G.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.P.; writing—review and editing, M.C., A.P., and V.N.V.; visualization, V.N.V.; supervision, M.C.; project administration, R.G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by Ethics Committee of UNIVERSITY EMERGENCY HOSPITAL (protocol code 73500 and date of approval 29 November 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dalmau, J.; Rosenfeld, M.R. Autoimmune Encephalitis Update. Neuro-Oncol. 2014, 16, 771–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Titulaer, M.J.; Soffietti, R.; Dalmau, J.; Gilhus, N.E.; Giometto, B.; Graus, F.; Grisold, W.; Honnorat, J.; Sillevis Smitt, P.A.E.; Tanasescu, R.; et al. Screening for Tumours in Paraneoplastic Syndromes: Report of an EFNS Task Force. Eur. J. Neurol. 2011, 18, 19-e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kim, J.; Park, S.H.; Jung, Y.R.; Park, S.W.; Jung, D.S. Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis in a Pregnant Woman. J. Epilepsy Res. 2015, 5, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Joubert, B.; García-Serra, A.; Planagumà, J.; Martínez-Hernandez, E.; Kraft, A.; Palm, F.; Iizuka, T.; Honnorat, J.; Leypoldt, F.; Graus, F.; et al. Pregnancy Outcomes in Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis: Case Series. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 7, e668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dalmau, J.; Lancaster, E.; Martinez-Hernandez, E.; Rosenfeld, M.R.; Balice-Gordon, R. Clinical Experience and Laboratory Investigations in Patients with Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis. Lancet Neurol. 2011, 10, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dalmau, J.; Gleichman, A.J.; Hughes, E.G.; Rossi, J.E.; Peng, X.; Lai, M.; Dessain, S.K.; Rosenfeld, M.R.; Balice-Gordon, R.; Lynch, D.R. Anti-NMDA-Receptor Encephalitis: Case Series and Analysis of the Effects of Antibodies. Lancet Neurol. 2008, 7, 1091–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Narayan, B.; Nelson-Piercy, C. Medical Problems in Pregnancy. Clin. Med. 2017, 17, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liu, H.; Chen, X. Recurrent Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis during Pregnancy Combined with Two Antibodies Positive. Arch. Womens Ment. Health 2021, 24, 1045–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bouman, A.; Heineman, M.J.; Faas, M.M. Sex Hormones and the Immune Response in Humans. Hum. Reprod. Update 2005, 11, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bellott, D.W.; Hughes, J.F.; Skaletsky, H.; Brown, L.G.; Pyntikova, T.; Cho, T.-J.; Koutseva, N.; Zaghlul, S.; Graves, T.; Rock, S.; et al. Chromosomes Retain Widely Expressed Dosage-Sensitive Regulators. Nature 2014, 508, 494–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mor, G.; Cardenas, I. The Immune System in Pregnancy: A Unique Complexity. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shoenfeld, Y.; Tincani, A.; Gershwin, M.E. Sex Gender and Autoimmunity. J. Autoimmun. 2012, 38, J71–J73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Whitacre, C.C. Sex Differences in Autoimmune Disease. Nat. Immunol. 2001, 2, 777–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Titulaer, M.J.; McCracken, L.; Gabilondo, I.; Armangué, T.; Glaser, C.; Iizuka, T.; Honig, L.S.; Benseler, S.M.; Kawachi, I.; Martinez-Hernandez, E.; et al. Treatment and Prognostic Factors for Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis: An Observational Cohort Study. Lancet Neurol. 2013, 12, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lim, J.-A.; Lee, S.-T.; Jung, K.-H.; Kim, S.; Shin, J.-W.; Moon, J.; Byun, J.-I.; Kim, T.-J.; Shin, Y.-W.; Lee, K.-J.; et al. Anti-N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis in Korea: Clinical Features, Treatment, and Outcome. J. Clin. Neurol. 2014, 10, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kumar, M.A.; Jain, A.; Dechant, V.E.; Saito, T.; Rafael, T.; Aizawa, H.; Dysart, K.C.; Katayama, T.; Ito, Y.; Araki, N.; et al. Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis during Pregnancy. Arch. Neurol. 2010, 67, 884–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ito, Y.; Abe, T.; Tomioka, R.; Komori, T.; Araki, N. Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis during pregnancy. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 2010, 50, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. McCarthy, A.; Dineen, J.; McKenna, P.; Keogan, M.; Sheehan, J.; Lynch, T.; O’Rourke, K. Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis with Associated Catatonia during Pregnancy. J. Neurol. 2012, 259, 2632–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jagota, P.; Vincent, A.; Bhidayasiri, R. Transplacental Transfer of NMDA Receptor Antibodies in an Infant with Cortical Dysplasia. Neurology 2014, 82, 1662–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shahani, L. Steroid Unresponsive Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis during Pregnancy Successfully Treated with Plasmapheresis. BMJ Case Rep. 2015, 2015, bcr2014208823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mathis, S.; Pin, J.-C.; Pierre, F.; Ciron, J.; Iljicsov, A.; Lamy, M.; Neau, J.-P. Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis During Pregnancy: A Case Report. Medicine 2015, 94, e1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chan, L.W.; Nilsson, C.; Schepel, J.; Lynch, C. A Rare Case of Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis during Pregnancy. N. Z. Med. J. 2015, 128, 89–91. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Lamale-Smith, L.M.; Moore, G.S.; Guntupalli, S.R.; Scott, J.B. Maternal-Fetal Transfer of Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antibodies. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 125, 1056–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xiao, X.; Gui, S.; Bai, P.; Bai, Y.; Shan, D.; Hu, Y.; Bui-Nguyen, T.M.; Zhou, R. Anti-NMDA-Receptor Encephalitis during Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2017, 43, 768–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Keskin, A.O.; Tanburoglu, A.; Idiman, E.; Ozturk, V. Anti-N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis during Pregnancy: A Case Report. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2019, 45, 935–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tailland, M.; Le Verger, L.; Honnorat, J.; Biquard, F.; Codron, P.; Cassereau, J. Post-Herpetic Anti-N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis in a Pregnant Woman. Rev. Neurol. 2020, 176, 129–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jung, K.-O.; Moon, H.-J. A Case of NMDAR Encephalitis Treated in the Third Trimester—Novel Arterial Spin Labeling Findings and a Review of Literature. J. Neuroimmunol. 2020, 343, 577235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sperling, M.M.; Waldrop, A.; Fowler, C.; Weiel, J.J.; Conturie, C.L.; Bianco, K. A Rare Case of Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis with Status Epilepticus in Pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. Res. 2021, 4, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Boniface, C.; Austin, B.; Chalela, J.; Newman, R. Anti-N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis in Pregnancy: An Interesting Case of Rapid Contralateral Ovarian Teratoma Development. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 7, 100091Z08CB2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reisz, D.; Gramescu, I.-G.; Mihaicuta, S.; Popescu, F.G.; Georgescu, D. NMDA Autoimmune Encephalitis and Severe Persistent Hypokalemia in a Pregnant Woman. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dono, F.; Evangelista, G.; Consoli, S.; Scorrano, G.; Russo, M.; di Pietro, M.; Onofrj, M.; Sensi, S.L.; Anzellotti, F. Anti N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor (NMDAr) Encephalitis during Pregnancy: A Case Report. Epilepsy Behav. Rep. 2022, 19, 100535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fredrich, S.; Wang, C.; Narayan, R.; Tardo, L.; Blackburn, K.M.; Vernino, S. Refractory Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis in Early Pregnancy: A Case Report of Treatment Course and Pregnancy Outcomes. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2022, 9, e200007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Scorrano, G.; Dono, F.; Evangelista, G.; Chiarelli, F.; Anzellotti, F. Fetal Outcome in Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis during Pregnancy: A Case Report. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2023, 123, 1989–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bansal, M.; Mehta, A.; Sarma, A.K.; Niu, S.; Silaghi, D.A.; Khanna, A.K.; Vallabhajosyula, S. Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis in Pregnancy Associated with Teratoma. Bayl. Univ. Med. Cent. Proc. 2023, 36, 524–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Das, G.; Damotte, V.; Gelfand, J.M.; Bevan, C.; Cree, B.A.C.; Do, L.; Green, A.J.; Hauser, S.L.; Bove, R. Rituximab before and during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review, and a Case Series in MS and NMOSD. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2018, 5, e453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. McGoldrick, E.; Stewart, F.; Parker, R.; Dalziel, S.R. Antenatal Corticosteroids for Accelerating Fetal Lung Maturation for Women at Risk of Preterm Birth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020, 12, CD004454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Clark, A.L. Clinical Uses of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Pregnancy. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999, 42, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The initial native brain MRI revealed: axial hyperintensity on the T2 and FLAIR sequences of the right temporo-occipital cortex; a “Swollen” appearance of the right temporo-occipital cortex, in hyper signal T2 and FLAIR (arrow), without a correspondent on the diffusion or T2* sequences, associated with moderate erasure of the intergyral grooves but without a mass effect on the midline structures; the imaging appearance raises the suspicion of a temporal cortical edema—parietal; no other abnormalities of brain signal or morphology, and no lesions with diffusion restriction or endocranial bleeding scars; normally positioned and sized ventricular system.
Figure 1. The initial native brain MRI revealed: axial hyperintensity on the T2 and FLAIR sequences of the right temporo-occipital cortex; a “Swollen” appearance of the right temporo-occipital cortex, in hyper signal T2 and FLAIR (arrow), without a correspondent on the diffusion or T2* sequences, associated with moderate erasure of the intergyral grooves but without a mass effect on the midline structures; the imaging appearance raises the suspicion of a temporal cortical edema—parietal; no other abnormalities of brain signal or morphology, and no lesions with diffusion restriction or endocranial bleeding scars; normally positioned and sized ventricular system.
Medicina 59 02110 g001
Figure 2. Three-dimensional Time-of-Flight (TOF) MR angiography: main endocranial arteries with fast flow and normal morphology. Asymmetry on the coronal FLAIR sequence (arrow).
Figure 2. Three-dimensional Time-of-Flight (TOF) MR angiography: main endocranial arteries with fast flow and normal morphology. Asymmetry on the coronal FLAIR sequence (arrow).
Medicina 59 02110 g002
Table 1. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis.
Table 1. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis.
TestResultNormal Range/Units
RBC367cells/mm3
TNC29cells/mm3
 -
Mononuclear cells %
85.3%
 -
Polymorphonuclear cells %
14.7%
 -
Mononuclear cells
19cells/mm3
 -
Polymorphonuclear cells
3cells/mm3
Glucose4940–70/mg/dL
Antineuronal antibodies
 -
Anti-Yo (PCA1)
negativenegative
 -
Anti-Hu (ANNA1)
negativenegative
 -
Anti-recoverin
weakly positivenegative
 -
Anti-SOX1
negativenegative
 -
Anti-Titin
negativenegative
 -
Anti NMDAR
positivenegative
HSV-1negativenegative
HSV-2negativenegative
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Potorac, A.; Varlas, V.N.; Borș, R.G.; Baroș, A.; Cirstoiu, M. The Management and Diagnosis of Anti-NMDA Receptor Autoimmune Encephalitis in Pregnant Women: A Case Report and Literature Review. Medicina 2023, 59, 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59122110

AMA Style

Potorac A, Varlas VN, Borș RG, Baroș A, Cirstoiu M. The Management and Diagnosis of Anti-NMDA Receptor Autoimmune Encephalitis in Pregnant Women: A Case Report and Literature Review. Medicina. 2023; 59(12):2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59122110

Chicago/Turabian Style

Potorac, Alina, Valentin Nicolae Varlas, Roxana Georgiana Borș, Alexandru Baroș, and Monica Cirstoiu. 2023. "The Management and Diagnosis of Anti-NMDA Receptor Autoimmune Encephalitis in Pregnant Women: A Case Report and Literature Review" Medicina 59, no. 12: 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59122110

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop