Next Article in Journal
Interpersonal Violence Is Associated with Self-Reported Stress, Anxiety and Depression among Men in East-Central Sweden: Results of a Population-Based Survey
Previous Article in Journal
Interstitial Ectopic Pregnancy—Case Reports and Medical Management
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 59
Issue 2
10.3390/medicina59020234
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of the Oxytocin Hormone on Pelvic Floor Muscles in Pregnant Rats

by
Emine Demir
1,
Sukriye Deniz Mutluay
2,* and
Hacer Sinem Buyuknacar
3
1
Department of Midwifery, Ege University Faculty of Health Sciences, 35575 Izmir, Turkey
2
Department of Midwifery, Cukurova University Faculty of Health Sciences, 01330 Adana, Turkey
3
Department of Pharmacology, Cukurova University Faculty of Pharmacy, 01330 Adana, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2023, 59(2), 234; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020234
Submission received: 2 November 2022 / Revised: 2 January 2023 / Accepted: 6 January 2023 / Published: 26 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics and Gynecology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Oxytocin induction is a known risk factor for pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of oxytocin induction on pelvic floor muscles in pregnant rats. Methods: Thirty-two female Wistar rats were included and divided into four groups (n = 8). The groups were as follows: virgin group (group I)–from which muscles were dissected at the beginning of the experiment; spontaneous vaginal delivery (group II) which has delivery spontaneously; saline control group (group III) and oxytocin group (group IV). In groups III and IV, pregnancy was induced on d 21 of pregnancy, with 2.5 mU saline solution or iv oxytocin, respectively, delivered by the intravenous (iv) route in pulses at 10-min intervals for 8 h. Then, the rats were euthanized, the m. coccygeus, m. iliocaudalis and m. pubocaudalis muscles were excised and tissue samples were taken. After histological processing, the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the muscles were analyzed under a light microscope. Results: In group IV; the measurement of the horizontal dimension of the m. pubocaudalis muscles was 50.1 ± 5.4 µm and it was significantly higher than other groups (p < 0.001). In group III; the mean value of the horizontal dimension of m. coccygeus muscle was found to be 49.5 ± 10.9 µm and it was significantly higher than other groups (p < 0.009). Between-group comparisons revealed no difference in mean m. iliocaudalis muscle dimension (p > 0.05). Conclusions: As a result of our study it can say that whether oxytocin induced or not, vaginal birth is a process that affects the pelvic muscles.

1. Introduction

The pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) are related to the compound structure which closes the bony pelvic outlet and is a muscular layer of the pelvic floor which comprises the m(musculus). coccygeus and the m. levator ani complex and supports the pelvic floor function [1,2]. PFMs play an important role in supporting the pelvic organs [3]. They are also very important during coughing, sneezing, strong respiration, defecation and intra-abdominal pressure during birth [3,4,5,6]. In addition, these muscles ensure internal rotation of the presenting part of the fetus during delivery and its progression through the birth canal [3,7].
Pregnancy and childbirth are common risk factors for complications such as placenta previa, uterine rupture, preeclampsia and pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) [8,9,10]. The symptoms of PFDs include urinary incontinence, bladder storage and voiding and post-micturition, pelvic organ prolapse, sexual dysfunction, anorectal dysfunction, lower urinary tract pain and/or other pelvic pain and lower urinary tract infections [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. These clinical manifestations of PFDs place a large financial burden on health systems [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. In addition, they give rise to major social, physical and psychological problems and reduce the quality of life and reproductive ability of women [14,15,17,18,19,20,21].
Although PFDs are painful and have adverse effects on quality of life, most women do not seek health care because of a lack of knowledge, shame or fear of complex treatments [20,22]. Thus, it is difficult to determine the prevalence of PFDs [20]. Previous studies showed that 11–35.5% of women worldwide suffered from PFDs, with figures of 7.6–13%, 1.7–35.5%, 2.9–20% and 0.2–13% reported for overactive bladder, urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and anal incontinence, respectively [22].
The causes of PFDs are not well understood, but they can be classified according to their origin into obstetric and non-obstetric causes. Advanced age, obesity or having a high body mass index, as well as heavy lifting, smoking, excessive exercise, connective tissue disorders and neurological diseases, can be considered non-obstetric causes [8,10,14,15,19,20,23,24]. Obstetric causes include parity, operative vaginal delivery, duration of the first and second stages of labour, episiotomy, epidural analgesia, laparoscopic and hysteroscopic interventions, occiput posterior presentation, macrosomy, foetal head size, obstetric trauma, perineal laceration, prostaglandin and oxytocin induction [10,15,19,20,21,23,24,25,26].
Oxytocin hormone is the most widely used pharmacological agent in induction and augmentation of labor [27,28,29]. Along with its widespread use, in 2007 the Institute for Safe Medication Practices and the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) added intravenous oxytocin administration to the high-risk drug list [30,31]. It is still a great challenge to predict whether oxytocin, which is on a high-risk drug list, affects maternal and neonatal outcomes due to misuse or oxytocin itself [32]. Therefore, the consequences of induction and augmentation of labor with oxytocin, both positive and negative effects on maternal and fetal-neonatal health, need to be investigated [32].
It is important to determine the changes that occur in the pelvic floor muscles during pregnancy in order to understand the effects of oxytocin hormone on pelvic floor disorders. It has been reported in many studies that important biomechanical and biochemical changes occur in the pelvic floor muscles while preparing for delivery from the pregnancy process [2,8,11]. Imaging parameters of the levator hiatus are used to detect these changes. However, examining the dimensions of the levator hiatus provides very limited information about pelvic floor musculature, strength and contractile capacity. The fact that the changes that pregnancy and childbirth cause on the pelvic floor muscles are not fully known makes it impossible to develop protective strategies [2].
Structural studies require complete isolation of the muscle to be examined. Since it is not possible to carry out such studies on humans, experimental animals are used [2,18]. Studies show that the pelvic floor muscles of primates are the best model in terms of similarity to human structure [18]. However, since studies on primates are very expensive and logistically difficult, other alternatives must be used [18]. Rabbits, mice and rats, which are more convenient than primates in terms of cost and production, are commonly preferred in the examination of pelvic floor muscles. In many studies, it has been determined that the m. coccygeus, m. iliocaudalis and m. pubocaudalis muscles in the pelvic floor muscles of rats are the most anatomically similar to the human pelvic floor muscles [2]. In addition, pregnancy-related changes in the cervix, vagina and supporting structures of the vagina of rats are very similar to the changes that occur in human anatomy [2].
Oxytocin induction is an accepted risk factor for PFDs. However, there are only a few studies on this subject, and no consensus on its role in PFDs has been reached [33,34,35]. Therefore, in this study we investigated the effects of oxytocin induction on PFMs in pregnant rats.

2. Materials and Methods

This was a randomized controlled trial. Since Clinical.trials only records human subject studies, the study could not be registered. The Cukurova University Animal Experiments local ethics committee approved all procedures (4 July 2018 with decision number 21). The experiments were performed between 15 September 2018 and 15 May 2019. All experiments were performed in accordance with guidelines on the care and use of animals.
The animals were housed-caged at an average ambient temperature of 21 ± 2 °C under a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle and food and water were provided ad libitum.
In total, 32 female Wistar Albino rats with a mean weight of 150–200 g were randomly divided into four groups (n = 8/group).
Group I: Virgin rats which had not given delivery before.
Group II: Pregnant rats which had spontaneous vaginal delivery.
Group III: Rats induced with saline solution intravenously (iv) on d 21 of pregnancy at 10 min intervals for 8 h and serving as a control group.
Group IV: Rats induced with oxytocin solution (iv) on d 21 of pregnancy at 10 min intervals for 8 h and serving as the experimental group.
At the age of 3 mo, the rats in group I (virgin group) were anesthetized under deep anesthesia, and the PFMs were dissected. All the rats in the other three delivery groups (groups II, III and IV) reached 3 mo of age, and oestrus cycles were checked daily by a vaginal smear. Upon estrus detection, each female rat was placed in a cage with four males. The day of vaginal plug development was accepted as the first day of pregnancy, and the male rats were removed from the cages. The rats in group II were anesthetized under deep anesthesia after spontaneous vaginal delivery, and the PFMs were dissected.
On d 21 of pregnancy, each rat was weighed, and Xylazine (%2 Rompun, Bayer; 10 mg/kg) and Ketamine (Ketalar, Parke-Davis, Sydney, Australia; 80 mg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally to provide deep anesthesia. After deep anesthesia, the rats were laid on their back, and iv catheters were inserted into the tail area. After catheterization, the rats in group III (saline solution group) received saline pulses every 10 min for 8 h according to their body weight. The rats in group IV received pulses of oxytocin solution (Synpitan Forte 5 IU/mL) every 10 min for 8 h according to their body weight. At the end of the 8-h experimental period, the rats in group III (saline solution group) and group IV (oxytocin group) were returned to their cages to continue with their pregnancies. After the rats (group III and IV) were returned to their cages, their water intake was restricted to 16 h to prevent anti-diuresis. Rats in both groups in which labor occurred within 24 h after the experiment were sacrificed and the tissue sample of the muscles were taken. In each rat, the m. coccygeus, m. iliocaudalis and m. pubocaudalis muscles located on the left side were dissected. The following bony landmarks were used to identify the origin/insertion points of m. coccygeus, m. iliocaudalis and m. pubocaudalis, respectively: pubic bone/insertion caudal (Ca) 1–2 vertebrae, ilium/Ca5-Ca6 vertebra and pubic bone/Ca3-Ca4 vertebrae (Figure 1) [18].

2.1. Examination of Pelvic Floor Muscles

The dissected PFMs were stored in tubes containing 10% formaldehyde for 3–5 d for fixation. To minimize the risk of bias in the study, a pathologist blinded to the study protocol evaluated the tissue samples. After 1 d of fixation and follow-up, the tissues were embedded in paraffin by using a vacuum tissue processor (Leica TP 1050). Subsequently, 4 µm-thick sections were cut from the tissues using a microtome (Leica 2125). An automatic staining device (Leica 5020) was used for hematoxylin and eosin staining.
After the pathological examination of the sections, the images were uploaded to a Leica-Aperio CS2 scanner for precise measurement of the tissues. The digital slides were examined at large magnification, and the vertical and horizontal dimensions of three randomly transverse cut muscle cells were measured and recorded using the pathology slide viewing software program (Aperio ImageScape) (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

2.2. Preparation of Oxytocin Solution

2.5 mU oxytocin was prepared by mixing 10 units of oxytocin (a) with 10 mL of saline [36].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS V23. Comparisons of the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the muscles’ mean values between groups were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance; multiple comparisons of the groups were analyzed using Tukey’s HSD. The paired sample t-test was used to determine the statistical significance of mean differences between experiment and control groups. The relationship between the rat weights and the vertical and horizontal aspect of the muscle measurements were examined by Pearson’s correlation. The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. p values of <0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Mean Values of Sections from the Rats

The mean values of the body weights in group I were lower than those in the other groups (Table 1) (p < 0.001).
When the mean body weights of the rats and the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the muscles were compared, there was a strong negative correlation between the vertical dimension of the m. pubocaudalis muscle and body weight in group I (r = −0.813; p = 0.014) and a strong negative correlation between the vertical dimension of the m. coccygeus muscle and body weight in group II (r = −0.817; p = 0.013). There was also a strong negative correlation between the horizontal dimensions of the m. coccygeus muscle and body weight in group II (r = −0.757; p = 0.030) and a strong negative correlation (r = −0.734; p = 0.038) between the vertical dimension of the m. coccygeus muscle and body weight in group III (Table 2) (p > 0.05). In group IV, no correlation was found between the body weight and pelvic floor muscle dimensions.
Between-group comparisons of the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the m. iliocaudalis muscle revealed no between-group differences in the average values in any of the groups (Table 3) (p = 0.831 and p = 0.266, respectively).
There was no difference in the mean value of the vertical dimension of the m. pubocaudalis muscle between groups (p = 0.604). When the mean values of the horizontal dimensions of the m. pubocaudalis muscle were compared in the various groups, the mean value in group IV (50.1 ± 5.4 µm) was higher than that in the other groups (Table 4) (p < 0.001).
There was no between-group difference in the average values of the vertical dimensions of the m. coccygeus muscle (p = 0.099). The mean values of the horizontal dimensions of the m. coccygeus muscle differed between the groups, with the mean value in group III (49.5 ± 10.9 µm) higher than that in group I (Table 5) (p = 0.009).
Figure 2 shows the image obtained from the m. pubocaudalis (PC) muscle of the rat in the oxytocin group. Accordingly, (H&E, X200) striated muscle cells are observed.
Figure 3 shows the image obtained from the m. coccygeus (C) muscle of the rat in the saline solution group. Accordingly, (H&E, X200) striated muscle cells are observed.

3.2. Observational Findings

In addition to statistical and light microscopic findings, observational findings were also recorded. Based on the observational findings, the majority of the rats in group III and group IV exhibited a tendency towards cannibalism after birth. However, cannibalism was not observed in group II. In addition, the number of stillbirths in groups III and IV was higher than that in the other groups, and no stillbirths were recorded in group II.

4. Discussion

The striated pelvic floor muscles (PFMs), comprise the coccygeus and the muscles of the levator ani complex [2]. However, in many studies in the literature, PFM and levator ani muscle are used interchangeably and the C muscle is not included [37]. It is known that striated muscles are most susceptible to injury when they are forcibly extended [38]. The level of injury to the muscle is proportional to the impact the muscle is exposed to during stretching [38]. Modeling and imaging studies estimate that vaginal delivery causes > 300% strain in the PFMs [2]. The strain at this level exceeds the physiological limit of striated muscles and causes PFM trauma [2]. Therefore, vaginal delivery is one of the important reasons of PFM trauma [37].
Synthetic oxytocin is commonly used for labor induction, augmentation and postpartum care in modern obstetrics [39,40]. Use of oxytocin itself was reported to be a risk factor for perineal damage during vaginal delivery, yet research on the implications beyond labor of maternal exposure to perinatal synthetic oxytocin is rare and in particular, there are very few studies examining the effect of oxytocin induction on pelvic floor muscles [33,35,39,40]. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the effects of oxytocin induction on pelvic floor muscles in pregnant rats.
Architectural studies require isolation of the whole muscle and this type of research is not feasible in women [2]. In rats, the location of coccygeus, iliocaudalis, and pubocaudalis muscle are anatomically similar to human PFMs [2]. Therefore, we used rats (virgin-group I, spontaneous vaginal delivery-group II, saline control-group III, and oxytocin-group IV) in our study. Our data showed that there were no between group differences in m. iliocaudalis muscle vertical and horizontal dimensions, whereas m. pubocaudalis muscle horizontal dimension was significantly larger in group IV, and m. coccygeus muscle horizontal dimension was significantly larger in group III.
In our study, it was determined that there was no difference between the groups in iliocaudalis muscle vertical and horizontal dimensions. Alperin et al. [37] examined the thickness level in the pelvic floor muscles due to the tension and stress occurring in the pelvic floor muscles during pregnancy and they found that there was no change in the m. iliocaudalis muscle. On the other hand, according to Shi et al. [41], a study conducted by magnetic resonance method indicates that the change has occurred in the m. iliocaudalis muscle. Alperin et al. [2] showed that m. iliocaudalis muscle size was significantly enlarged in the postpartum group compared to the virgin group (14.8 ± 0.24 mm in the virgin group and 18.7 ± 0.61 mm in the postpartum group, p < 0.001). We think that this difference may be due to the difference in research methodologies.
In our study, when the difference between the groups in terms of horizontal size averages of the m. pubocaudalis muscle was examined, the mean value (50.1 ± 5.4 µm) obtained in the oxytocin group was found to be statistically significantly higher than the other groups (p < 0.001). Shi et al. [41], in a study they have done with a magnetic resonance imaging method, concluded that the m. pubocaudalis muscle of the levator ani muscle was the most damaged in primipara women. Likewise, Lien et al. [38] and Parente et al. [42] determined that the m. pubocaudalis muscle was damaged the most. These similar results may have resulted from the location of the m. pubocaudalis muscle in both humans and experimental animals.
In our study, when the mean values of the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the m. coccygeus muscle were compared according to the groups, the horizontal size of the m. coccygeus muscle differed according to the groups, and it was seen that the average value obtained in the saline group was higher than the virgin group (p = 0.009). Alperin et al. [37], in a study in which they examined the thickness level of the pelvic floor muscles due to the tension and stress in the pelvic floor muscles during pregnancy, stated that the highest level of stiffness occurred in the m. coccygeus muscle (52%) compared to other muscles. Similarly, Catanzarite et al. [43] stated that the most tension occurs in the m. coccygeus muscle compared to other pelvic floor muscles during vaginal delivery. Lindo et al. [17] and Bracken et al. [19] stated in their study on monkeys that the volume of the m. coccygeus muscle increased due to pregnancy and vaginal delivery. On the other hand, Alperin et al. [2] stated in a study they conducted that the m. coccygeus muscle mass did not change due to pregnancy and birth. We think that this difference may be due to the difference in research methodologies.
Evidence suggests that rats and mice tend to eat their young more than other species. Rats are prone to cannibalism, especially in the presence of stressful environmental stimuli such as high frequency noise, frequent cage changing, excessive cage movement, water or food restriction [44]. Observational studies have found an association between oxytocin use and adverse outcomes for newborns [32]. During our study, we also paid attention to the observational findings. In this study, the majority of the rats in group III and group IV showed a tendency towards cannibalism after birth, whereas this was not observed in group II. In addition, the number of stillbirths in groups III and IV was higher than that in the other groups, and no stillbirths were recorded in group II. Any intervention in spontaneous vaginal delivery affects the physiology of birth [3]. Ozturk and Sayiner reported that environmental changes such as social stress, immobilization, water and food restriction, light, darkness and crowding, diversely affect the physiology of spontaneous vaginal delivery [45]. These findings may be attributed to intervening in the normal life cycle of the rats.
Although there are many studies related to uterine rupture [9,10] and pelvic floor dysfunction due to pregnancy and delivery in the clinic, we could not find any study in the literature that histologically demonstrated the effect of oxytocin hormone on pelvic floor muscles. To our knowledge, this is the first study in the literature demonstrating the effects of oxytocin induction on pelvic floor muscle in rats. In our study, we observed that there was no significant difference in vertical and horizontal dimensions between the groups for m. iliocaudalis muscles, but we found that the mean value of the horizontal dimension of the m. pubocaudalis muscle was significantly larger in group IV compared to groups I, II and III. In addition, we found that the mean value of the horizontal dimension of the m. coccygeus muscle in group III was significantly larger when compared to the mean value of the horizontal dimension of the m.coccygeus muscle in group I. In our study, besides the statistical data, it was observed that most of the rats in the saline solution and oxytocin groups showed a tendency to cannibalism after birth. However, such a situation was not encountered in the spontaneous vaginal delivery group. In addition, rats in the saline solution and oxytocin groups showed a tendency to give birth to stillborn puppies, while stillborn puppies were not detected in the spontaneous vaginal delivery group.
In conclusion, we can say that oxytocin administration does not have a direct harmful effect on the pelvic floor muscles, and that the pregnancy process and labor may have made histological changes on these muscles. In addition, we think that the birth process and the birth environment should not subjected to intervention unless necessary.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.D., S.D.M., and H.S.B.; Methodology, E.D., S.D.M., H.S.B.; Investigation, E.D. and S.D.M.; Data curation, E.D.; Writing—original draft, E.D.; Writing—review & editing, S.D.M.; Supervision, S.D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Cukurova University Animal Experiments local ethics committee approved all procedures (4 July 2018 with decision number 21).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Financial support was provided for this study by the Cukurova University Academic Staff Training (OYP) Coordination Unit.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Messelink, B.; Benson, T.; Berghmans, B.; Bø, K.; Corcos, J.; Fowler, C.; Laycock, J.; Lim, P.H.-C.; van Lunsen, R.; Nijeholt, G.L.Á.; et al. Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: Report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2005, 24, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alperin, M.; Lawley, D.M.; Esparza, M.C.; Lieber, R.L. Pregnancy-induced adaptations in the intrinsic structure of rat pelvic floor muscles. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2015, 213, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Pascali, D. The pelvic floor. In Oxorn–Foote Human Labor & Birth, 6th ed.; Posner, G.D., Dy, J., Black, A.Y., Jones, G.D., Eds.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 10–13. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hilde, G.; Stær Jensen, J.; Siafarikas, F.; Engh, M.E.; Brækken, I.H.; Bø, K. Impact of childbirth and mode of delivery on vaginal resting pressure and on pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2013, 208, 50.e1–50.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Obloza, A.; Toozs Hobson, P. 2D USS of the pelvic floor in the 3rd trimester versus mode of delivery. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2018, 230, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lammers, K.; Prokop, M.; Vierhout, M.E.; Kluivers, K.B.; Fütterer, J.J. A pictorial overview of pubovisceral muscle avulsions on pelvic floor magnetic resonance imaging. Insights Imaging 2013, 4, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Martin, W.L.; Hutchon, S.P. Mechanism and management of normal labour. Curr. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2004, 14, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bozkurt, M.; Yumru, A.E.; Şahin, L. Pelvic floor dysfunction, and effects of pregnancy and mode of delivery on pelvic floor. Taiwan J. Obs. Gynecol. 2014, 53, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Dellino, M.; Crupano, F.M.; He, X.; Malvasi, A.; Vimercati, A. Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section with hysterotomy above the lower uterine segment. Acta Biomed. 2022, 93, 2. [Google Scholar]
  10. Vimercati, A.; Dellino, M.; Suma, C.; Damiani, G.R.; Malvasi, A.; Cazzato, G.; Cascardi, E.; Resta, L.; Cicinelli, E. Spontaneous Uterine Rupture and Adenomyosis, a Rare but Possible Correlation: Case Report and Literature Review. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Oliphant, S.S.; Nygaard, I.E.; Zong, W.; Canavan, T.P.; Moalli, P.A. Maternal adaptations in preparation for parturition predict uncomplicated spontaneous delivery outcome. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2014, 211, 630.e1–630.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vila Pouca, M.C.P.; Ferreira, J.P.S.; Oliveira, D.A.; Parente, M.P.L.; Mascarenhas, T.; Natal Jorge, R.M. On the effect of labour durations using an anisotropic visco-hyperelastic-damage approach to simulate vaginal deliveries. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2018, 88, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rodríguez Mias, N.L.; Martínez Franco, E.; Aguado, J.; Sánchez, E.; Amat Tardiu, L. Pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, do they share the same risk factors? Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2015, 190, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lisonkova, S.; Lavery, J.A.; Ananth, C.V.; Chen, I.; Muraca, G.; Cundiff, G.W.; Joseph, K.S. Temporal trends in obstetric trauma and inpatient surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: An age-period-cohort analysis. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2016, 215, 208.e1–208.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Memon, H.U.; Handa, V.L. Vaginal childbirth and pelvic floor disorders. Women’s Health 2013, 9, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oliveira, D.A.; Parente, M.P.; Calvo, B.; Mascarenhas, T.; Natal Jorge, R.M. Numerical simulation of the damage evolution in the pelvic floor muscles during childbirth. J. Biomech. 2016, 49, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lindo, F.M.; Carr, E.S.; Reyes, M.; Gendron, J.M.; Ruiz, J.; Parks, V.L.; Kuehl, T.J.; Larsen, W.I. Randomized trial of cesarean vs vaginal delivery for effects on the pelvic floor in squirrel monkeys. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2015, 213, 735.e1–735.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Alperin, M.; Tuttle, L.J.; Conner, B.R.; Dixon, D.M.; Mathewson, M.A.; Ward, S.R.; Lieber, R.L. Comparison of pelvic muscle architecture between humans and commonly used laboratory species. Int. UroGynecol. J. 2014, 25, 1507–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bracken, J.N.; Reyes, M.; Gendron, J.M.; Pierce, L.M.; Runge, V.M.; Kuehl, T.J. Alterations in pelvic floor muscles and pelvic organ support by pregnancy and vaginal delivery in squirrel monkeys. Int. UroGynecol. J. 2011, 22, 1109–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Dheresa, M.; Worku, A.; Oljira, L.; Mengiste, B.; Assefa, N.; Berhane, Y. One in five women suffer from pelvic floor disorders in Kersa district Eastern Ethiopia: A community-based study. BMC Women’s Health 2018, 18, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Pregazzi, R.; Sartore, A.; Troiano, L.; Grimaldi, E.; Bortoli, P.; Siracusano, S.; Guaschino, S. Postpartum urinary symptoms: Prevalence and risk factors. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2002, 103, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lipschuetz, M.; Cohen, S.M.; Liebergall-Wischnitzer, M.; Zbedat, K.; Hochner-Celnikier, D.; Lavy, Y.; Yagel, S. Degree of bother from pelvic floor dysfunction in women one year after first delivery. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2015, 191, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Durnea, C.M.; Khashan, A.S.; Kenny, L.C.; Durnea, U.A.; Dornan, J.C.; O’Sullivan, S.M.; O’Reilly, B. What is to blame for postnatal pelvic floor dysfunction in primiparous women-Pre-pregnancy or intrapartum risk factors? Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2017, 214, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cyr, M.P.; Kruger, J.; Wong, V.; Dumoulin, C.; Girard, I.; Morin, M. Pelvic floor morphometry and function in women with and without puborectalis avulsion in the early postpartum period. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2017, 216, 274.e1–274.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dietz, H.P.; Campbell, S. Toward normal birth–but at what cost? Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2016, 215, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Leijonhufvud, A.; Lundholm, C.; Cnattingius, S.; Graanath, F.; Andolf, E.; Altman, D. Risks of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse surgery in relation to mode of childbirth. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2011, 204, 70.e1–70.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Daniel Spiegel, E.; Weiner, Z.; Ben Shlomo, I.; Shalev, E. For how long should oxytocin be continued during induction of labour? BJOG 2004, 111, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hickey, M.; Ruth, D.J. Induction and augmentation of labor. In Intrapartum Management Modules, a Perinatal Education Program, 4th ed.; Kennedy, B.B., Ruth, D.J., Martın, E.J., Eds.; Wolters Kluwer Health–Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2009; pp. 218–232. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cunningham, F.G.; Leveno, K.J.; Bloom, S.L.; Spong, C.Y.; Dashe, J.S.; Hoffman, B.L.; Casey, B.M.; Sheffield, J.S. Williams Obstetrics, 24th ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 523–530. [Google Scholar]
  30. Molitch, M.E.; Schimmer, B.P. Introduction to endocrinology: The hypothalamic-pituitary axis. In Goodman & Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 13th ed.; Brunton, L.L., Hilal Dandan, R., Knollmann, B.C., Eds.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 782–784. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mahlmeister, L.R. Best practices in perinatal care: Evidence-based management of oxytocin induction and augmentation of labor. J. Perinat. Neonatal. Nurs. 2008, 22, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bernitz, S.; Øian, P.; Rolland, R.; Sandvik, L.; Blix, E. Oxytocin and dystocia as risk factors for adverse birth outcomes: A cohort of low-risk nulliparous women. Midwifery 2014, 30, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Low, L.K.; Zielinski, R.; Tao, Y.; Galecki, A.; Brandon, C.J.; Miller, J.M. Predicting birth-related levator ani tear severity in primiparous women: Evaluating maternal recovery from labor and delivery (EMRLD study). Open J. Obs. Gynecol. 2014, 4, 266–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Aran, T.; Osmanagaoglu, M.A.; Kart, C.; Guven, S.; Sahin, M.; Unsal, M.A. Failed labor induction in nulliparous women at term: The role of pelvic floor muscle strength. Int. UroGynecol. J. 2012, 23, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kearney, R.; Miller, J.M.; Ashton Miller, J.A.; DeLancey, J.O.L. Obstetrical factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obs. Gynecol. 2006, 107, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Arias, F. Pharmacology of oxytocin and prostaglandins. Clin. Obs. Gynecol. 2000, 43, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Alperin, M.; Kaddis, T.; Pichika, R.; Esparza, M.C.; Lieber, R.L. Pregnancy-induced adaptations in intramuscular extracellular matrix of rat pelvic floor muscles. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2016, 215, 210.e1–210.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Lien, K.C.; Mooney, B.; DeLancey, J.O.L.; Ashton Miller, J.A. Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obs. Gynecol. 2004, 103, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Karahan, N.; Arslan, H.; Çam, Ç. The behaviour of pelvic floor muscles during uterine contractions in spontaneous and oxytocin-induced labour. J. Obs. Gynaecol. 2018, 38, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bell, A.F.; Erickson, E.N.; Carter, C.S. Beyond labor: The role of natural and synthetic oxytocin in the transition to motherhood. J. Midwifery Womens Health 2014, 59, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Shi, M.; Shang, S.; Xie, B.; Wang, J.; Hu, B.; Sun, X.; Wu, J.; Hong, N. MRI changes of pelvic floor and pubic bone observed in primiparous women after childbirth by normal vaginal delivery. Arc. Gynecol. Obs. 2016, 294, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Parente, M.P.L.; Jorge, R.N.; Mascarenhas, T.; Fernandes, A.A.; Martins, J.A.C. The influence of an occipito-posterior malposition on the biomechanical behavior of the pelvic floor. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2009, 144, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Catanzarite, T.; Bremner, S.; Barlow, C.L.; Bou-Malham, L.; O’connor, S.; Alperin, M. Pelvic muscles’ mechanical response to strains in the absence and presence of pregnancy-induced adaptations in a rat model. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2018, 218, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lane-Petter, W. Parental Injuries to Offspring: Cannibalism in Rats and Mice. J. R. Soc. Med. 1968, 61, 1295–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Sayiner, F.D.; Öztürk, D.M.; Ulupinar, E. Stress caused by environmental effects on the birth process and some of the labor hormones at rats: Ideal birth environment and hormones. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2019, 34, 2600–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Medicina 59 00234 g001 550
Figure 1. Rat left m. iliocaudalis (IC), m. pubocaudalis (PC) and m. coccygeus (C) muscles.
Figure 1. Rat left m. iliocaudalis (IC), m. pubocaudalis (PC) and m. coccygeus (C) muscles.
Medicina 59 00234 g001
Medicina 59 00234 g002 550
Figure 2. Oxytocin group m. pubocaudalis (PC) muscle.
Figure 2. Oxytocin group m. pubocaudalis (PC) muscle.
Medicina 59 00234 g002
Medicina 59 00234 g003 550
Figure 3. Saline solution group m. coccygeus (C) muscle.
Figure 3. Saline solution group m. coccygeus (C) muscle.
Medicina 59 00234 g003
Table
Table 1. Average values of body weight of rats by groups.
Table 1. Average values of body weight of rats by groups.
Groups (n = 8)Body Weight (g)
Group I169.3 ± 0.9 (a)
Group II271 ± 1.1 (b)
Group III267.5 ± 30 (b)
Group IV276 ± 22 (b)
Test StatisticsF = 60.481
p <0.001
Group I: Virgin group, Group II: Spontaneous vaginal delivery group, Group III: Saline solution group, Group IV: Oxytocin group, F: One-way analysis of variance, a-b: There is no difference between groups with the same letter in the corresponding column.
Table
Table 2. Comparison of vertical and horizontal dimensions of muscle body weights.
Table 2. Comparison of vertical and horizontal dimensions of muscle body weights.
Muscles Group IGroup IIGroup IIIGroup IV
m.iliocaudalis verticalr−0.2870.329−0.3520.051
p0.4910.4270.3930.904
m.iliocaudalis horizontalr0.3580.377−0.6690.632
p0.3840.3570.0700.093
m.pubocaudalis verticalr −0.813 0.2610.115−0.352
p 0.014 0.5330.7870.392
m.pubocaudalis horizontal r−0.271−0.2170.5000.558
p0.5160.6050.2070.150
m.coccygeus vertical r0.111 −0.817 −0.734 0.303
p0.794 0.013 0.038 0.466
m.coccygeus horizontal r0.510 −0.757 0.499−0.432
p0.196 0.030 0.2080.285
Group I: Virgin group, Group II: Spontaneous vaginal delivery group, Group III: Saline solution group, Group IV: Oxytocin group.
Table
Table 3. Comparison of the mean values of the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the m. iliocaudalis muscle according to the groups.
Table 3. Comparison of the mean values of the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the m. iliocaudalis muscle according to the groups.
Groups (n = 8)Vertical (µm)Horizontal (µm)Test Statistics
Group I60.1 ± 15.736.7 ± 8.2t = 3.999
Group II63.4 ± 7.136.7 ± 4.8t = 10.162
Group III63.4 ± 11.142.2 ± 4.7t = 5.736
Group IV65.1 ± 7.240.1 ± 7.4t = 9.332
Test StatisticsF=0.292F = 1.392
p0.8310.266
Group I: Virgin group, Group II: Spontaneous vaginal delivery group, Group III: Saline solution group, Group IV: Oxytocin group, F: One-way analysis of variance, t: Dependent samples t-test.
Table
Table 4. Comparison of the mean values of the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the m. pubocaudalis muscle according to the groups.
Table 4. Comparison of the mean values of the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the m. pubocaudalis muscle according to the groups.
Groups (n = 8)Vertical (µm)Horizontal (µm)Test Statistics
Group I67.2 ± 15.735.7 ± 5.2 (a)t = 5.853
Group II73.8 ± 10.036.3 ± 2.8 (a)t = 11.901
Group III76.7 ± 15.337.7 ± 4.3 (a)t = 6.514
Group IV74.8 ± 16.950.1 ± 5.4 (b)t = 4.255
Test StatisticsF = 0.626F= 18.125
p0.604 <0.001
Group I: Virgin group, Group II: Spontaneous vaginal delivery group, Group III: Saline solution group, Group IV: Oxytocin group, F: One-way analysis of variance, t: Dependent samples t-test, a-b: There is no difference between groups with the same letter in the corresponding column.
Table
Table 5. Comparison of the mean values of the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the m. coccygeus muscle by groups.
Table 5. Comparison of the mean values of the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the m. coccygeus muscle by groups.
Groups (n = 8)Vertical (µm)Horizontal (µm)Test Statistics
Group I64.7 ± 12.337.6 ± 5.6 (a)t = 6.165
Group II88.7 ± 29.540.3 ± 6.5 (ab)t = 5.756
Group III70.7 ± 5.549.5 ± 10.9 (b)t = 8.466
Group IV79.6 ± 22.046.7 ± 4.5 (ab)t = 4.482
Test StatisticsF = 2.302F = 4.642
p0.099 0.009
Group I: Virgin group, Group II: Spontaneous vaginal delivery group, Group III: Saline solution group, Group IV: Oxytocin group, F: One-way analysis of variance, t: Dependent samples t-test, a-b: There is no difference between groups with the same letter in the corresponding column.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Demir, E.; Mutluay, S.D.; Buyuknacar, H.S. Effects of the Oxytocin Hormone on Pelvic Floor Muscles in Pregnant Rats. Medicina 2023, 59, 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020234

AMA Style

Demir E, Mutluay SD, Buyuknacar HS. Effects of the Oxytocin Hormone on Pelvic Floor Muscles in Pregnant Rats. Medicina. 2023; 59(2):234. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020234

Chicago/Turabian Style

Demir, Emine, Sukriye Deniz Mutluay, and Hacer Sinem Buyuknacar. 2023. "Effects of the Oxytocin Hormone on Pelvic Floor Muscles in Pregnant Rats" Medicina 59, no. 2: 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020234

APA Style

Demir, E., Mutluay, S. D., & Buyuknacar, H. S. (2023). Effects of the Oxytocin Hormone on Pelvic Floor Muscles in Pregnant Rats. Medicina, 59(2), 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020234

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop