Next Article in Journal
The Role of Antibiotic Use in Third Molar Tooth Extractions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization and Short-Term Outcome of Potential Celiac Disease in Children
Previous Article in Journal
A Ribosome-Related Prognostic Signature of Breast Cancer Subtypes Based on Changes in Breast Cancer Patients’ Immunological Activity
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Celiac Disease and the Gluten Free Diet during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experiences of Children and Parents

Medicina 2023, 59(3), 425; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030425
by Johanna M. Kreutz 1,2, Laura Heynen 2, Lisanne Arayess 1,2 and Anita C. E. Vreugdenhil 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Medicina 2023, 59(3), 425; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030425
Submission received: 10 January 2023 / Revised: 8 February 2023 / Accepted: 20 February 2023 / Published: 21 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Celiac Disease: Understanding the Gluten-Free Diet)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript submitted for publication by Anita C.E. Vreugdenhil and collaborators sought to relate the Covid 19 pandemic to the celiac disease diet in young individuals. Although the subject may be useful for studying the eating habits of young people, I believe that the results presented are very limited. This means that the conclusions that the authors present cannot be drawn.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

This is a well-executed study regarding dietary habits in patients with CD during COVID 19 pandemic. I have enjoyed reading the study and I do not have any further comments. I recommend acceptance in the current form. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript in its present form after the changes made appears more interesting. The criticism of the small number of subjects observed remains.

Back to TopTop