Accuracy of Computer-Guided Implantology with Pilot Drill Surgical Guide: Retrospective 3D Radiologic Investigation in Partially Edentulous Patients
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Pre-Surgical Protocol
2.3. Surgical Protocol
2.4. Superimposition and Variables
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Descriptive Analysis
3.2. Accuracy Analysis
- Total coronal deviation: mean 1.08 mm, sd ± 0.59 mm, median 1.10 mm, minimum value 0.12 mm, and maximum value 2.60 mm;
- Total apical deviation: mean 1.77 mm, sd ± 0.81 mm, median 1.85 mm, minimum value 0.01 mm, and maximum value 3.18 mm;
- Depth deviation: mean −0.48 mm, sd ± 1.74 mm, median −0.39 mm, minimum value −4.11 mm, and maximum value 2.70 mm;
- Angular deviation on the B-L plane: 4.75° mean, sd ± 2.78°, median 4.69°, minimum value 0°, and maximum value 11.67°;
- Angular deviation on the M-D plane: mean 5.22°, sd ± 3.12°, median 4.78°, minimum value 0°, and maximum value 13.16°;
- Imprecision area: mean 16.96 mm2, sd ± 6.32 mm2, median 16.37 mm2, minimum value 5.69 mm2, and maximum value 30.93 mm2.
3.3. Analysis of Qualitative Variables
- (1).
- Analysis according to the jaw (upper and lower)
- (2).
- Analysis according to the arch areas (anterior, medium, and posterior)
- (3).
- Analysis according to the length of the implant
- (4).
- Analysis according to the implant diameter
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Albrektsson, T. A multicenter report on osseointegrated oral implants. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1988, 60, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lekholm, U.L.F.; Gunne, J.; Henry, P.; Higuchi, K.; Lindén, U.; Bergström, C.; Van Steenberghe, D. Survival of the Brǻnemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: A 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 1999, 14, 639–645. [Google Scholar]
- Ekelund, J.A.; Lindquist, L.W.; Carlsson, G.E.; Jemt, T. Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: A prospective study on Brǻnemark system implants over more than 20 years. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2003, 16, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Pjetursson, B.E.; Tan, K.; Lang, N.P.; Bragger, U.; Egger, M.; Zwahlen, M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2004, 15, 667–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jemt, T.; Johansson, J. Implant treatment in the edentulous maxillae: A 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2006, 8, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Santis, D.; Canton, L.C.; Cucchi, A.; Zanotti, G.; Pistoia, E.; Nocini, P.F. Computer-assisted surgery in the lower jaw: Double surgical guide for immediately loaded implants in postextractive sites-technical notes and a case report. J. Oral Implantol. 2010, 36, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Santis, D.; Graziani, P.; Castellani, R.; Zanotti, G.; Gelpi, F.; Marconcini, S.; Bertossi, D.; Nocini, P.F. A New Radiologic Protocol and a New Occlusal Radiographic Index for Computer-Guided Implant Surgery. J. Craniofacial Surg. 2016, 27, e506–e510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hobkirk, J.A.; Havthoulas, T.K. The influence of mandibular deformation, implant numbers, and loading position on detected forces in abutments supporting fixed implant superstructures. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1998, 80, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanford, C.M. Biomechanical and functional behavior of implants. Adv. Dent. Res. 1999, 13, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopp, K.C.; Koslow, A.H.; Abdo, O.S. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003, 89, 611–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marlière, D.A.A.; Demètrio, M.S.; Picinini, L.S.; De Oliveira, R.G.; Netto, H.D.D.M.C. Accuracy of computer-guided surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A systematic review. Eur. J. Dent. 2018, 12, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vercruyssen, M.; Cox, C.; Coucke, W.; Naert, I.; Jacobs, R.; Quirynen, M. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2014, 41, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vercruyssen, M.; Coucke, W.; Naert, I.; Jacobs, R.; Teughels, W.; Quirynen, M. Depth and lateral deviations in guided implant surgery: An RCT comparing guided surgery with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2014, 26, 1315–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Younes, F.; Cosyn, J.; De Bruyckere, T.; Cleymaet, R.; Bouckaert, E.; Eghbali, A. A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2018, 45, 721–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013, 310, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Buser, D.; Martin, W.; Belser, U.C. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: Anatomic and surgical considerations. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2004, 19, 43–61. [Google Scholar]
- Canullo, L.; Tallarico, M.; Radovanovic, S.; Delibasic, B.; Covani, U.; Rakic, M. Distinguishing predictive profiles for patient-based risk assessment and diagnostics of plaque induced, surgically and prosthetically triggered peri-implantitis. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2016, 27, 1243–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Younes, F.; Eghbali, A.; De Bruyckere, T.; Cleymaet, R.; Cosyn, J. A randomized controlled trial on the efficiency of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2019, 30, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cassetta, M.; Stefanelli, L.V.; Giansanti, M.; Calasso, S. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2012, 27, 655–663. [Google Scholar]
- Testori, T.; Parenti, A.; Motroni, A.; Rinaldi, M.; Luongo, G.; Garrone, R.; Robiony, M. Multicenter clinical study on accuracy and precision of a new guided surgery system. Ital. Oral Surg. 2012, 11, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cassetta, M.; Stefanelli, L.V.; Giansanti, M.; Di Mambro, A.; Calasso, S. Accuracy of a Computer-Aided Implant Surgical Technique. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2013, 33, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Santis, D.; Malchiodi, L.; Cucchi, A.; Cybulski, A.; Verlato, G.; Gelpi, F.; Nocini, P.F. The Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery Performed Using Fully Guided Templates versus Pilot-Drill Guided Templates. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 9023548. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2019/9023548 (accessed on 13 July 2019). [CrossRef]
- Nocini, P.F.; De Santis, D.; Morandini, B.; Procacci, P. A dental implant in the infratemporal fossa: Case report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2013, 28, e195–e197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cassetta, M.; Stefanelli, L.; Giansanti, M.; Di Mambro, A.; Calasso, S. Depth deviation and occurrence of early surgical complications or unexpected events using a single stereolithographic surgi-guide. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2011, 40, 1377–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vasak, C.; Watzak, G.; Gahleitner, A.; Strbac, G.; Schemper, M.; Zechner, W. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuideTM)-guided implant positions: A prospective radiological study. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2011, 22, 1157–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bencharit, S.; Staffen, A.; Yeung, M.; Whitley, D., III; Laskin, D.M.; Deeb, G.R. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2018, 76, 1431–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Assche, N.; Quirynen, M. Tolerance within a surgical guide. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2010, 21, 455–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koop, R.; Vercruyssen, M.; Vermeulen, K.; Quirynen, M. Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2013, 24, 630–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lal, K.; White, G.S.; Morea, D.N.; Wright, R.F. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept. J. Prosthodont. Implant. Esthet. Reconstr. Dent. 2006, 15, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahmaseb, A.; Wu, V.; Wismeijer, D.; Coucke, W.; Evans, C. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2018, 29 (Suppl. 16), 416–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boa, K.; Barrak, I.; Varga Jr, E.; Joob-Fancsaly, A.; Varga, E.; Piffko, J. Intraosseous generation of heat during guided surgical drilling: An ex vivo study of the effect of the temperature of the irrigating fluid. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2016, 54, 904–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barrak, I.; Boa, K.; Joób-Fancsaly; Varga, E.; Sculean, A.; Piffkó, J. Heat Generation During Guided and Freehand Implant Site Preparation at Drilling Speeds of 1500 and 2000 RPM at Different Irrigation Temperatures: An In Vitro Study. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2019, 17, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Spille, J.; Jin, F.; Behrens, E.; Açil, Y.; Lichtenstein, J.; Naujokat, H.; Gülses, A.; Flörke, C.; Wiltfang, J. Comparison of implant placement accuracy in two different preoperative digital workflows: Navigated vs. pilot-drill-guided surgery. Int. J. Implant. Dent. 2021, 7, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abduo, J.; Lau, D. Accuracy of static computer-assisted implant placement in anterior and posterior sites by clinicians new to implant dentistry: In vitro comparison of fully guided, pilot-guided, and freehand protocols. Int. J. Implant. Dent. 2020, 6, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Putra, R.H.; Yoda, N.; Astuti, E.R.; Sasaki, K. The accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery in partially edentulous patients and possible influencing factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2022, 66, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mean (±Standard Deviation) | Median (Min-Max Value) | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Total coronal deviation | 1.08 (0.59) | 1.10 (0.12–2.60) | <0.001 |
Total apical deviation | 1.77 (0.81) | 1.85 (0.01–3.18) | <0.001 |
Depth deviation | −0.48 (1.74) | −0.39 (−4.11–2.70) | 0.087 |
Angular deviation on B-L plane | 4.75 (2.78) | 4.69 (0–11.67) | <0.001 |
Angular deviation on M-D plane | 5.22 (3.12) | 4.78 (0–13.16) | <0.001 |
Imprecision area | 16.96 (6.32) | 16.37 (5.69–30.93) | <0.001 |
Author | Total Coronal Deviation | Total Apical Deviation | Depth Deviation | Angular Deviation on B-L Plane | Angular Deviation on M-D Plane |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vercruyssen et al., 2014 [12,13] | 2.97 ± 1.41 mm | 3.40 ± 1.68 mm | 2.20 ± 1.44 mm | 8.43 ± 5.10° | |
Younes et al., 2018 [14] | 1.12 ± 0.49 mmd | 1.43 ± 0.88 mm | 0.68 ± 0.44 mm | 5.95 ± 4.26° | |
Tahmaseb et al., 2018 [30] | 0.9 mm (CI 95%: 0.79–1.00) | 1.2 mm (CI 95%: 1.11–1.20) | 0.2 mm (CI 95%: 0.25–0.57) | 3.3°(CI 95%: 20.7–4.63) | |
Present study | 1.08 ± 0.59 mm | 1.77 ± 0.81 mm | −0.48 ± 1.74 mm | 4.75 ± 2.78° | 5.22 ± 3.12° |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gelpi, F.; Modena, N.; Poscolere, A.; Bernardello, F.; Torroni, L.; De Santis, D. Accuracy of Computer-Guided Implantology with Pilot Drill Surgical Guide: Retrospective 3D Radiologic Investigation in Partially Edentulous Patients. Medicina 2023, 59, 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040738
Gelpi F, Modena N, Poscolere A, Bernardello F, Torroni L, De Santis D. Accuracy of Computer-Guided Implantology with Pilot Drill Surgical Guide: Retrospective 3D Radiologic Investigation in Partially Edentulous Patients. Medicina. 2023; 59(4):738. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040738
Chicago/Turabian StyleGelpi, Federico, Nicolò Modena, Alessandro Poscolere, Fabio Bernardello, Lorena Torroni, and Daniele De Santis. 2023. "Accuracy of Computer-Guided Implantology with Pilot Drill Surgical Guide: Retrospective 3D Radiologic Investigation in Partially Edentulous Patients" Medicina 59, no. 4: 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040738