Prevention of Postoperative Urethral Strictures by Irrigation with 5-Fluorouracil via a Modified Urinary Catheter
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Characteristics of the Object of Study
2.2. Ethical Approval Details
2.3. Protocol for Transurethral Resection of BPH
2.4. Description of the Utility Model of the Modified Three-Way Foley Catheter
2.5. Description of Preventive Intervention
2.6. Instrumental Methods of Examination
2.7. Evaluation of the Severity of Dysuric Symptoms and Quality of Life in Dynamics
2.8. Statistical Data Processing
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Santucci, R.A.; Joyce, G.F.; Wise, M. Male urethral stricture disease. J. Urol. 2007, 177, 1667–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Latini, J.M.; McAninch, J.W.; Brandes, S.B.; Chung, J.Y.; Rosenstein, D. SIU/ICUD Consultation on urethral strictures: Epidemiology, etiology, anatomy, and nomenclature of urethral stenoses, strictures, and pelvic fracture urethral disruption injuries. Urology 2014, 83 (Suppl. 3), 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mundy, A.R.; Andrich, D.E. Urethral strictures. BJU Int. 2011, 107, 6–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chapple, C.R. Pharmacological therapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia, low urinary tract symptoms: The overview for the practicing clinician. Br. J. Urol. Int. 2004, 94, 738–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Zeng, M.; Xue, R.; Wang, G.; Gao, Z.; Yuan, W.; Tang, Z. Causes and management for male urethral stricture. Zhong Nan Da XueXueBao Yi Xue Ban 2018, 43, 520–527. [Google Scholar]
- Anger, J.T.; Buckley, J.C.; Santucci, R.A.; Elliott, S.P.; Saigal, C.S. Trends in stricture management among male Medicare beneficiaries: Underuse of urethroplasty. Urology 2011, 77, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palminteri, E.; Berdondini, E.; Verze, P.; De Nunzio, C.; Vitarelli, A.; Carmignani, L. Contemporary urethral stricture characteristics in the developed world. Urology 2013, 81, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavalcanti, A.G.; Costa, W.S.; Baskin, L.S.; McAninch, J.A.; Sampaio, F.J. A morphometric analysis of bulbar urethral strictures. BJU Int. 2007, 100, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, D.; Zhou, C.; Girardot, J.; Kidron, A.; Gupta, S.; Cavalcanti, A.G.; Bittencourt, L.K. Imaging in urethral stricture disease: An educational review of current techniques with a focus on MRI. Abdom. Imaging 2023, 48, 1062–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raheem, O.A.; Buckley, J.C. Adjunctive maneuvers to treat urethral stricture: A review of the worldliterature. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2014, 3, 170–178. [Google Scholar]
- Hietanen, K.E.; Järvinen, T.A.; Huhtala, H. Treatment of keloid scars with intralesional triamcinolone and 5-fluorouracil injections—A randomized controlled trial. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2019, 72, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, M.; Steggall, M.; Gelbart, M. Catheterisation: Indwelling Catheters in Adults; City University of London: London, UK, 2012; 19p. [Google Scholar]
- Kairambayev, Y. Three-Way Catheter for Drainage and Irrigation of the Bladder and Urethra. Utility Model Patent No. 4223, 6 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Huhtaniemi, I. Late-onset hypogonadism: Current concepts and controversies of pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Asian J. Androl. 2014, 16, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xia, B.; Zhao, S.; Chen, Z.; Chen, C.; Liu, T.; Yang, F.; Yan, Y. The underlying mechanism of metabolic syndrome on benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate volume. Prostate 2020, 80, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wei, Z.; Lin, W.; Fan, B.; Feng, S. Efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide alone and in combination with 5-fluorouracil for treating hypertrophic scars and keloids: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. Wound J. 2017, 14, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alexandrescu, D.; Fabi, S.; Yeh, L.C.; Fitzpatrick, R.E.; Goldman, M.P. Comparative results in treatment of keloids with Intralesional 5- FU/Kenalog, 5-FU/Verapamil, Enalapril Alone, Verapamil Alone, and Laser: A case report and review of the literature. J. Drug Dermatol. 2016, 15, 1442–1447. [Google Scholar]
- Khalid, F.A.; Mehrose, M.Y.; Saleem, M.; Yousaf, M.A.; Mujahid, A.M.; Rehman, S.U.; Ahmad, S.; Tarar, M.N. Comparison of efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone and combination of triamcinolone with 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars: Randomised control trial. Burns J. Int. Soc. Burn Inj. 2019, 45, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bijlard, E.; Steltenpool, S.; Niessen, F.B. Intralesional 5-fluorouracil in keloid treatment: A systematic review. Acta Dermato-Venereol. 2015, 95, 778–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, F.; Lei, L.; Shen, Y.Y.; Hou, J.W.; Chen, W.L.; Li, Y.G.; Guo, S.R. Effects of amphiphilic PCL-PEG-PCL copolymer addition on 5-fluorouracil release from biodegradable PCL films for stent application. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 419, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, W.; Yu, Q.; Ma, J.; Xu, C.; Wu, D.; Li, C. Triamcinolone acetonide combined with 5-fluorouracil suppresses urethral scar fibroblasts autophagy and fibrosis by increasing miR-192-5p expression. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021, 13, 5956–5968. [Google Scholar]
- Roehrborn, C.G.; Barkin, J.; Gange, S.N.; Shore, N.D.; Giddens, J.L.; Bolton, D.M.; E Cowan, B.; Cantwell, A.L.; McVary, K.T.; Te, A.E.; et al. Five year results of the prospective randomized controlled prostatic urethral L.I.F.T. study. Can. J. Urol. 2017, 24, 8802–8813. [Google Scholar]
- Surur-Zaibaka, E.; Bolado-García, P.B.; Gamboa-López, G.J.; Gómez-Ávalos, T.; Mena-Ramírez, L.F. Urethral plasticity and quality of life associated with the surgical technique in UnidadMédica de Alta Especialidad Mérida [Plastiauretral y calidad de vidaasociada a la técnicaquirúrgicaen laUnidadMédica de Alta Especialidad Mérida]. Cir. Cir. 2018, 86, 313–320. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Angulo, J.C.; Kulkarni, S.; Pankaj, J.; Nikolavsky, D.; Suarez, P.; Belinky, J.; Virasoro, R.; DeLong, J.; Martins, F.E.; Lumen, N.; et al. Urethroplasty after Urethral Urolume Stent: An International Multicenter Experience. Urology 2018, 118, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alonso-Morales, A.; Montiel-Jarquín, Á.J.; Camarillo-Noriega, C.A.; Parra-Salazar, J.A.; Romero-Tlalpan, G.A.; García-Galicia, A.; Loría-Castellanos, J. Uretroplasty with oral mucosal graft in patients with anterior urethral stenosis. Comparative study with conventional treatment. Cir. Cir. 2021, 89, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Günes, M.; Keles, M.O.; Kaya, C.; Koca, O.; Sertkaya, Z.; Akyüz, M.; Altok, M.; Umul, M.; Karaman, M.I. Does resectoscope size play a role in formation of urethral stricture following transurethral prostate resection? Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2015, 41, 744–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chung, P.H.; Vanni, A.J.; Breyer, B.N.; Erickson, B.A.; Myers, J.B.; Alsikafi, N.; Buckley, J.; Elliott, S.P.; Zhao, L.C.; Voelzke, B.B. Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons (TURNS). Evaluation of Generic Versus Condition-Specific Quality of Life Indicators for Successful Urethral Stricture Surgery. Urology 2019, 126, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al’-Shukri, S.K.; Ananiĭ, I.A.; Amdiĭ, R.E.; Kuz’min, I.V. Urinary discomforts in patients after radical prostatectomy. Vestn. Khir. Im. II Grek. 2015, 174, 63–66. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, A.K.; Kucherov, V.; Glick, L.; Chung, P. Male urinary incontinence after prostate disease treatment. Can. J. Urol. 2020, 27, 36–43. [Google Scholar]
- Verla, W.; Oosterlinck, W.; Spinoit, A.F.; Waterloos, M. A Comprehensive Review Emphasizing Anatomy, Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Male Urethral Stricture Disease. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 9046430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Shukri, S.H.; Pushkar, D.Y.; Apolikhin, O.I.; Evdokimov, M.S.; Kogan, M.I.; Krivoborodov, G.G.; Kagan, O.F.; Petrov, S.B.; Poltoratskyi, A.N.; Kuzmin, I.V.; et al. Imidafenacin for treatment of overactive bladder and urgent urinary incontinence: The results of open-label multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. Urologiia 2018, 6, 20–25. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapple, C.R. Current controversies in functional urology. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2015, 25, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.H.; Ko, W.J.; Yoo, T.K.; Oh, T.H.; Kim, D.Y.; Kwon, D.D.; Byun, S.S.; Kim, S.I.; Jung, T.Y. Factors associated with continuing medical therapy after transurethral resection of prostate. Urology 2014, 84, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lumen, N.; Verla, W.; Waterloos, M.; Waterschoot, M. Update on the management of complex strictures of the bulbar urethra. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2021, 31, 516–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Puche-Sanz, I.; Martín-Way, D.; Flores-Martín, J.; Expósito-Ruiz, M.; Vicente-Prados, J.; Nogueras-Ocaña, M.; Tinaut-Ranera, J.; Cózar-Olmo, J.M. Psychometric validation of the Spanish version of the USS-PROM questionnaire for patients who undergo anterior urethral surgery. Actas Urol. Esp. 2016, 40, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Characteristics | N | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 40–50 | 1 | 0.4 |
51–60 | 43 | 17.5 | |
61–70 | 119 | 48.4 | |
71–80 | 83 | 33.7 | |
Body mass index | <25 | 77 | 31.3 |
25–30 | 120 | 48.8 | |
>30 | 49 | 19.9 | |
Residence | City | 187 | 76.0 |
Village | 59 | 24.0 | |
Type 2 diabetes | 38 | 15.44 | |
Arterial hypertension | 93 | 37.8 | |
Heart failure (I–II functional classes by NYHA) | 21 | 8.53 |
Laboratory Rates | Study Groups | Test of Significance | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Group | Control Group | |||||||
Median | 25th Percentile | 75th Percentile | Median | 25th Percentile | 75th Percentile | U Test | p-Value | |
Urinalysis: leukocytes before surgery(in the field of view) | 6.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 9.0 | 6902.5 | 0.233 |
10 days after surgery | 6.0 | 5.0 | 8.5 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 6226.0 | 0.015 |
3 months after surgery | 4.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6730.5 | 0.125 |
6 months after surgery | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 7269.0 | 0.583 |
Urinalysis: erythrocytes before surgery (in the field of view) | 5.0 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 7218.5 | 0.533 |
10 days after surgery | 18.0 | 14.5 | 22.0 | 20.0 | 17.0 | 25.0 | 5715.5 | <0.001 |
3 months after surgery | 4.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 6357.5 | 0.026 |
6 months after surgery | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 5383.0 | <0.001 |
Urinalysis: protein before surgery (g/L): | 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.066 | 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.066 | 7329.5 | 0.648 |
10 days after surgery | 0.33 | 0.165 | 0.99 | 0.33 | 0.165 | 0.99 | 7083.5 | 0.376 |
3 months after surgery | 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.066 | 0.066 | 0.033 | 0.066 | 6883.0 | 0.174 |
6 months after surgery | 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.033 | 6995.0 | 0.130 |
Prostate specific antigen before surgery (ng/L): | 3.05 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 7394.0 | 0.760 |
10 days after surgery | 4.0 | 3.3 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 4.6 | 6228.5 | 0.016 |
3 months after surgery | 3.0 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 7408.0 | 0.779 |
6 months after surgery | 2.6 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 2.45 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 7100.5 | 0.405 |
Total Score | Study Groups | Test of Significance | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Group | Control Group | |||||||
Median | 25th Percentile | 75th Percentile | Median | 25th Percentile | 75th Percentile | U Test | p-Value | |
Before surgery | 19 | 17 | 23 | 19 | 16 | 22 | 7057.5 | 0.362 |
10 days after surgery | 12 | 10 | 16 | 14 | 11 | 15 | 7090.0 | 0.393 |
3 months after surgery | 8 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 5703.0 | <0.001 |
6 months after surgery | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 3573.5 | <0.001 |
Quality of Life | Study Groups | Test of Significance | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Group | Control Group | ||||||
N | % | N | % | χ2 | p-Value | ||
Before surgery | Good | 2 | 1.6 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.556 | 0.906 |
Unsatisfactory | 28 | 22.6 | 30 | 24.6 | |||
Bad | 88 | 71.0 | 84 | 68.9 | |||
Very bad | 6 | 4.8 | 7 | 5.7 | |||
10 days after surgery | Beautiful | 9 | 7.3 | 3 | 2.5 | 9.31 | 0.054 |
Good | 42 | 33.9 | 31 | 25.4 | |||
Satisfactory | 66 | 53.2 | 73 | 59.8 | |||
Mixed feeling | 7 | 5.6 | 12 | 9.8 | |||
Unsatisfactory | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 2.5 | |||
3 months after surgery | Beautiful | 8 | 6.5 | 2 | 1.6 | 37.530 | <0.001 |
Good | 56 | 45.2 | 27 | 22.1 | |||
Satisfactory | 58 | 46.8 | 64 | 52.5 | |||
Mixed feeling | 2 | 1.6 | 29 | 23.8 | |||
6 months after surgery | Beautiful | 10 | 8.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 40.935 | <0.001 |
Good | 64 | 51.6 | 29 | 23.8 | |||
Satisfactory | 46 | 37.1 | 72 | 59.0 | |||
Mixed feeling | 4 | 3.2 | 17 | 13.9 | |||
Unsatisfactory | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 3.3 |
Rate | Study Groups | Test of Significance | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Group | Control Group | |||||||
Median | 25th Percentile | 75th Percentile | Median | 25th Percentile | 75th Percentile | U Test | p-Value | |
Prostate size before surgery (cm3) | 58.0 | 51.95 | 64.7 | 55.45 | 48.4 | 62.3 | 6419.0 | 0.04 |
Prostate size 6 months after surgery | 16.0 | 13.2 | 20.2 | 18.0 | 15.0 | 21.0 | 6551.0 | 0.069 |
Maximum urinary flow rate before surgery (mL/s) | 7.0 | 5.0 | 9.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 7498.5 | 0.906 |
Maximum urinary flow rate 10 days after surgery (mL/s) | 12.0 | 11.0 | 14.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 14.0 | 6984.0 | 0.290 |
Maximum urinary flow rate 3 months after surgery (mL/s) | 20.0 | 18.0 | 22.0 | 18.0 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 4388.0 | <0.001 |
Maximum urinary flow rate 6 months after surgery (mL/s) | 22.0 | 20.0 | 23.0 | 19.0 | 18.0 | 21.0 | 3722.5 | <0.001 |
The amount of residual urine before surgery (mL) | 187.5 | 140.0 | 320.0 | 187.5 | 150.0 | 300.0 | 7558.5 | 0.992 |
The amount of residual urine 10 days after surgery (mL) | 80.50 | 70.0 | 100.0 | 90.0 | 80.0 | 100.0 | 7134.5 | 0.437 |
The amount of residual urine 3 months after surgery (mL) | 30.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 50.0 | 40.0 | 60.0 | 2860.0 | <0.001 |
The amount of residual urine 6 months after surgery (mL) | 20.0 | 10.0 | 30.0 | 40.0 | 30.0 | 50.0 | 3149.0 | <0.001 |
Dysuria | Study Groups | Test of Significance | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Group | Control Group | ||||||
N | % | N | % | χ2 | p-Value | ||
Before surgery | Present | 124 | 100.0 | 121 | 99.2 | 1.021 | 0.312 |
Absent | - | - | 1 | 0.8 | |||
10 days after surgery | Present | 24 | 19.4 | 44 | 36.1 | 8.586 | 0.003 |
Absent | 100 | 80.6 | 78 | 63.9 | |||
3 months after surgery | Present | 14 | 11.3 | 55 | 45.1 | 34.795 | <0.001 |
Absent | 110 | 88.7 | 67 | 54.9 | |||
6 months after surgery | Present | 8 | 6.5 | 49 | 40.2 | 39.261 | <0.001 |
Absent | 116 | 93.5 | 73 | 59.8 |
Urethral Strictures | Study Groups | Test of Significance | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Group | Control Group | ||||||
N | % | N | % | χ2 | p-Value | ||
3 months after surgery | Present | 1 | 0.8 | 4 | 3.3 | 1.888 | 0.169 |
Absent | 123 | 99.2 | 118 | 96.7 | |||
6 months after surgery | Present | 1 | 0.8 | 9 | 7.3 | 3.855 | 0.05 |
Absent | 123 | 99.2 | 113 | 92.7 | |||
Stricture localization | Prostatic urethra | 1 | 100 | 5 | 45 | ||
Membranous urethra | - | - | 3 | 27 | |||
Bladder neck sclerosis | - | - | 1 | 9 | |||
Procedures 3 months after surgery | Bougienage | 1 | 100 | 3 | 75 | ||
Urethrotomy | - | - | 1 | 25 | |||
Procedures 6 months after surgery | Bougienage | 1 | 100 | - | - | ||
Urethrotomy | - | - | 9 | 100 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kairambayev, Y.; Bulegenov, T.; Omarov, N.; Kuderbayev, M.; Syzdykbayev, M.; Glushkova, N.; Akhmetzhanova, D.; Kaskabayeva, A.; Muzdubayeva, Z.; Akimzhanov, K.; et al. Prevention of Postoperative Urethral Strictures by Irrigation with 5-Fluorouracil via a Modified Urinary Catheter. Medicina 2024, 60, 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010102
Kairambayev Y, Bulegenov T, Omarov N, Kuderbayev M, Syzdykbayev M, Glushkova N, Akhmetzhanova D, Kaskabayeva A, Muzdubayeva Z, Akimzhanov K, et al. Prevention of Postoperative Urethral Strictures by Irrigation with 5-Fluorouracil via a Modified Urinary Catheter. Medicina. 2024; 60(1):102. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010102
Chicago/Turabian StyleKairambayev, Yerbol, Tolkyn Bulegenov, Nazarbek Omarov, Muratkan Kuderbayev, Marat Syzdykbayev, Natalya Glushkova, Dinara Akhmetzhanova, Alida Kaskabayeva, Zhanna Muzdubayeva, Kuat Akimzhanov, and et al. 2024. "Prevention of Postoperative Urethral Strictures by Irrigation with 5-Fluorouracil via a Modified Urinary Catheter" Medicina 60, no. 1: 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010102
APA StyleKairambayev, Y., Bulegenov, T., Omarov, N., Kuderbayev, M., Syzdykbayev, M., Glushkova, N., Akhmetzhanova, D., Kaskabayeva, A., Muzdubayeva, Z., Akimzhanov, K., & Pivina, L. (2024). Prevention of Postoperative Urethral Strictures by Irrigation with 5-Fluorouracil via a Modified Urinary Catheter. Medicina, 60(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010102