Next Article in Journal
Can Ileostomy Reversal Be Safely Performed by Surgical Residents?
Previous Article in Journal
Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Second-Line Chemotherapy Compared with Immunotherapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Association of Oral Tobacco-Free Nicotine Delivery Product with Acute Renal Tubular Necrosis

1
Department of Pediatrics, Nemours Children’s Hospital, Orlando, FL 32827, USA
2
Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
3
Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2024, 60(11), 1846; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111846
Submission received: 30 September 2024 / Revised: 30 October 2024 / Accepted: 4 November 2024 / Published: 9 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Technologies in Pediatric Nephrology)

Abstract

:
Usage of novel non-tobacco oral nicotine delivery products (ONDPs) has been increasing among adolescents in the United States. It is presumed that they are less toxic than their tobacco-containing counterparts, but that has not been examined in controlled studies. Most of the studies have focused on non-renal manifestations of tobacco consumption via different means. The renal manifestations of non-tobacco ONDPs are not very well known, especially in immunocompromised patients. A 19-year-old male transplant recipient presented with flank pain and a few days’ history of intake of ZYNR pouches. Immunosuppression was with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. Baseline serum creatinine was 1.1–1.3 mg/dL. Laboratory evaluation showed elevated C-reactive protein, increased serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, leukocytosis, neutrophilia, and increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Infectious disease work-up was negative. A kidney transplant biopsy showed severe acute tubular injury/necrosis (ATN) without evidence of rejection. Donor-specific antibodies were negative. Other etiologies of hemolysis were negative. He did not require renal replacement therapy. Kidney function and LDH improved gradually. The most recent follow-up eight months after presentation showed a serum creatinine level of 2.6 mg/dL with stable electrolytes, with eGFR of 35 mL/min/1.73 m2. Here, we describe a 19-year-old adolescent with a kidney transplant who sustained ATN leading to advanced chronic disease apparently following the usage of non-tobacco ONDP. Further larger studies are needed to study ATN as a possible renal manifestation of these next-generation products to raise awareness among the public.

1. Introduction

Oral nicotine delivery products (ONDPs) provide an alternate route of nicotine delivery to the conventional inhaled tobacco products [1]. In 2024, 1.8% of middle and high school students in the United States reported current usage of nicotine pouches [1]. Among those who currently used nicotine pouches, 29.3% reported frequent use, and 22.4% reported daily use. The majority of them used ZYNR (68.7%); 85.6% used flavored products [2]. Some of the smokeless ONDPs currently available in the market are chewing tobacco, snus, and moist snuff. These smokeless ONDPs are known to contain several harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) such as tobacco-specific nitrosamines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [3]. Various substances are used in these ONDPs, such as artificial sweeteners (xylitol, maltitol, sucralose, acesulfame K, aspartame), binders, humectants, pH adjusters, stabilizers, artificial colors, and coating agents [3]. Some of the additives, such as aspartame, have been linked with cancers such as hepatocellular carcinoma in humans [4].
Nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs), such as lozenges, gums, and patches, which predominantly deliver nicotine are widely used as treatments for tobacco addiction. Recently, tobacco-free nicotine pouches such as ZYNR have also been gaining popularity among teens and adults as novel ONDPs. The ZYNR pouch ingredients consist of water, fillers (microcrystalline cellulose and plant fibers), a humectant (glycerine), pH adjusters (sodium carbonate and calcium chloride), sodium chloride, food-grade flavorings, a nicotine solution, a monoglyceride, and a sweetener such as acesulfame K [5]. Also, a total of three HPHCs were found in both the ZYNR dry and ZYNR moist products: formaldehyde, chromium, and ammonia. Traces of nickel, just above the quantification limit, were also found, but nitrosamines and PAH were absent in ZYNR dry [5]. Formaldehyde has been shown to cause glomerular degeneration, acute tubular necrosis, edematous obstruction, and hematuria [6].
Various studies have described nicotine-induced nephrotoxicity. Here, we present a 19-year-old male with a kidney transplant who presented with acute tubular necrosis after consumption of ZYNR. To the best of our knowledge, this association has not been described in the past.

2. Case Presentation

A 19-year-old Caucasian male underwent a living-related kidney transplant from his mother 17 years ago for end-stage kidney disease secondary to posterior urethral valve. He had stable allograft function throughout the years, with a baseline serum creatinine of 1.1–1.3 mg/dL (MDRD eGFR 71–96 mL/min/1.73 m2). He was last seen in the clinic for a follow-up about a month ago with stable baseline serum creatinine. He presented to the emergency department with sudden-onset right-sided flank pain associated with nausea and dysuria. He denied history of gross hematuria, decreased oral fluid intake, changes in urine output, trauma, vomiting, diarrhea, or fever. His medications consisted of tacrolimus 2 mg twice daily, mycophenolate 500 mg twice daily, prednisone 5 mg daily, and losartan 25 mg daily. He reported compliance with these medications. He admitted that he had started taking ZYNR pouches (Swedish Match, Stockholm, Sweden) several days prior to this presentation, but denied smoking and usage of other tobacco-containing ONDPs. He also denied usage of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
His past medical history was significant for hospitalization three months ago for acute left eyelid swelling in the setting of a history of chronic pansinusitis, nasal polyposis, and asthma for more than 10 years. The computed tomography scan of the orbit without contrast and magnetic resonance imaging of the sinuses with gadolinium showed evidence of extensive paranasal sinus disease with a dehiscence along the left cribriform plate with intracranial extension. He was treated with a three-day course of 60 mg daily prednisone followed by a taper to the baseline dose, ampicillin–sulbactam, levofloxacin, metronidazole, and fluconazole, for three weeks. Four weeks later, he underwent an extensive functional endoscopic sinus surgery along with bilateral ablation of nasal polyps. The tissue biopsy from both maxillary sinuses showed features of chronic rhinosinusitis with eosinophils and eosinophilic mucin, and Grocott methenamine silver (GMS) stains showed abundant fungal hyphae consistent with allergic fungal sinusitis. This was consistent with allergic fungal chronic rhinosinusitis rather than invasive fungal disease. There was no drainable sinus fluid to send for aspergillus or mucormycetes cultures. Chest x-ray was normal. The patient did not have clinical signs or symptoms of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), and hence, bronchoalveolar lavage was not felt to be necessary by the expert infectious disease team. Serum (1,3)-beta-D-glucan testing was negative.
Family history was not suggestive of kidney failure, dialysis, or transplantation, except for his mother being the donor for his transplanted kidney.
Upon presentation, his initial vital signs showed a temperature of 98.4 °F (36.8 °C), a heart rate of 110 beats per minute, a respiratory rate of 20 per min, a blood pressure of 104/66 mm Hg, an oxygen saturation of 95% on room air, and a body mass index of 24.1 kg/m2. Physical examination was otherwise normal except for an ill-appearing young male with a midline abdominal scar from prior kidney transplantation and mild tenderness in the right lower quadrant (RLQ).
Initial investigations showed elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), increased serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, leukocytosis, neutrophilia, and increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, Table 1). Plasma haptoglobin was normal. Human rhino/enterovirus was positive. Blood and urine cultures (obtained via clean catch) were negative. Renal transplant sonogram with doppler showed an echogenic transplant kidney measuring 10.9 cm in length with no hydronephrosis or perinephric fluid collection and patent waveforms in the renal artery and vein. Native kidneys were atrophic. A computed tomography scan of the abdomen without contrast showed a non-obstructing 3 mm stone in the mid pole of the RLQ transplant kidney. Urinalysis showed glycosuria without associated hyperglycemia, 2+ proteinuria, absence of microscopic hematuria, dilute urine, and no evidence of urinary tract infection. The random urine protein to creatinine ratio was 0.8. Urine beta-2 microglobulin was elevated (Table 1). All other infectious disease work-ups were negative.
Given suspected bacteremia due to the elevated CRP, the patient received a three-day course of intravenous cefepime, which was discontinued after the cultures resulted negative. He also received intravenous pulse methylprednisolone 1 gm daily for three days (prior to the biopsy) for suspected rejection.
A percutaneous kidney transplant biopsy obtained three days after admission showed nine glomeruli which were normocellular with patent capillary lumens. There was no segmental sclerosis, necrosis, or crescent formation. Two of the glomeruli were globally sclerotic. There was interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy involving 25% of the cortical parenchyma. There were a few scattered CD3-positive lymphocytes and CD68 immunoreactive mononuclear cells, primarily within the interstitium (Figure 1). There was no peritubular capillaritis or tubulitis. There was severe acute tubular injury characterized by tubular cytoplasmic vacuolization; cell sloughing; individual cell necrosis; and large, regenerative-appearing nuclei, mitotic figures, and luminal casts (Figure 1A,D). There was prominent hyalinosis of the arterioles and a few small arteries. There were no definitive microthrombi or vasculitis identified. Immunostain for BK virus was negative. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed that glomeruli were negative for IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, C1q, albumin, kappa light chain, and lambda light chain. Electron microscopy showed a renal cortex exhibiting acute tubular and glomerular endothelial cytoplasmic swelling along with mild mesangial expansion, without any electron-dense deposits. The donor-specific antibodies were negative.
Given the lower likelihood of rejection, the steroid dose was converted to a home baseline dose of 5 mg daily, and he did not receive further anti-rejection therapies. Losartan was switched to amlodipine due to elevated serum creatinine. The patient remained afebrile and hemodynamically stable. CRP peaked at 389 mg/L on day four of presentation. Serum LDH showed a gradual decline. Serum trough tacrolimus levels remained therapeutic, with a goal trough level of 3–5 ng/mL. The abdominal pain and hematuria resolved about a week after presentation. At the time of discharge, serum LDH decreased to 488 IU/L (Figure 2) and normalized three weeks later. Serum creatinine was 6.1 mg/dL at the time of discharge and was followed up closely on an outpatient basis. The discharge medications consisted of tacrolimus 2 mg twice daily, mycophenolate 250 mg twice daily, prednisone 5 mg daily, and amlodipine 10 mg daily.
A repeat transplant kidney biopsy four months after initial presentation showed evidence of severe interstitial fibrosis involving about 80% of the renal cortex, evidence of grade 1A T cell mediated rejection, negative BK virus staining, and severe interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy involving 80% of the parenchyma. Given the age of the transplant and severe chronicity, the clinical team and the family decided not to augment the immunosuppressive therapy. The most recent follow-up eight months after presentation showed a serum creatinine level of 2.6 mg/dL with stable electrolytes, with eGFR of 35 mL/min/1.73 m2.

3. Discussion

ZYNR is a novel, next-generation, non-tobacco-based ONDP in a pouch formulation which does not burn tobacco or produce smoke. Studies have shown that there are no measurable levels of nitrosamines or PAHs in these products and that the numbers of quantified HPHCs are similar between ZYNR and NRT products, found at low levels compared to tobacco-based products [5]. The incidence of usage of nicotine in high schoolers and young adults remains substantial. In 2023, 22.2% of U.S. middle and high school students reported ever using any tobacco product, and 10% of students reported current use of any tobacco product [7]. With regard to the nicotine pouches, their current usage was 41.3% among the current smokeless tobacco users [8].
Nicotine has been shown to be nephrotoxic [9,10,11]. The kidneys of chronic smokers contain high concentrations of nicotine via glomerular filtration and tubular secretion of nicotine [10,12]. The human proximal renal tubular epithelial cells (PRTECs) have prominent nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) [13,14]. One study showed that nicotine causes nephrotoxicity through the induction of NLRP6 inflammasome and alpha7 nAChRs [13]. The mean renal tubular injury scores were higher in the nicotine group than in the normal group [13]. In this study, the expression of kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), a marker of tubular injury, was also significantly increased in the kidney tissue [13]. Nicotine also has been shown to induce apoptosis by generating reactive oxygen species and cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase, and by activating the MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways in PRTECs [15]. The PRTECs are highly susceptible to apoptosis, leading to acute tubular injury [16]. The tubular injury seen in the patient described in this report could have been from one of these mechanisms. Repeated nicotine exposure from chronic smoking may sensitize the kidney to ischemic insults and may facilitate the progression of acute kidney injury to chronic kidney injury [17].
LDH is commonly measured in patients suspected to have hemolysis. However, it is also a marker of cell injury and necrosis. A high concentration of LDH is found in the renal tubular cells [18]. Hence, the elevated level of serum LDH may be a biomarker of renal tubular injury [19,20,21]. After kidney transplantation, ischemic ATN, not allograft rejection, leads to a rise in LDH [22,23]. In delayed graft function, LDH may act as a good non-invasive marker of kidney injury and may serve as a better way to serially assess the clinical outcome or guide the management [24,25]. In kidney transplant recipients with preexistent tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis, such as this patient, ONDPSs may exacerbate the renal tubular injury, leading to marked elevation in LDH. However, this needs to be studied further. Tacrolimus is a known cause of drug-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). However, in the absence of peripheral schistocytes, thrombocytopenia, decreased plasma haptoglobin, absence of thrombi in the biopsy, and normal serum trough tacrolimus levels, tacrolimus-induced HUS leading to elevated LDH was unlikely 17 years after the transplantation. In the absence of anemia, normal plasma haptoglobin, and a normal Coombs test, other causes of transient elevation in serum LDH were less likely in the patient described in this report. The serum LDH and (1,3)-beta-D-glucan are good non-invasive markers of PJP infection in HIV-uninfected immunocompromised patients [26]. However, given the absence of clinical features of PJP and normal (1,3)-beta-D-glucan, this was unlikely in this patient. One of the limitations of the study is the unavailability of urinary cotinine levels, along with the immunohistochemical markers of the nicotine and ZYNR metabolites in the kidney tissue specimen.

4. Conclusions

This report highlights the importance of knowledge of the possible association of ONDPs with acute tubular injury. It remains to be studied whether the incidence of this specific renal toxicity is more prevalent in immunocompromised patients, as described in this report. Although we could not establish a definite cause and effect relationship between ONDP and renal tubular injury, this report suggests that clinicians will need to be vigilant in searching for a history of usage of ONDPs in patients presenting with unexplained rises in LDH and acute tubular injury. Given the widespread usage among high schoolers, further studies are necessary to determine the incidence of acute tubular injury in users of ONDPs.

Author Contributions

R.A. was in charge of writing the case report and the structure/flow of the paper. R.A. was in charge of writing the conception and discussion. W.C. was in charge of writing the pathology discussion and the interpretation of the biopsy. K.U. oversaw the concept, writing, and editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

We obtained written informed consent from the patient for publication of this case report.

Data Availability Statement

The authors declare that data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Delnevo, C.D.; Hrywna, M.; Miller Lo, E.J.; Wackowski, O.A. Examining market trends in smokeless tobacco sales in the United States: 2011–2019. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2021, 23, 1420–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Park-Lee, E.; Jamal, A.; Cowan, H.; Sawdey, M.D.; Cooper, M.R.; Birdsey, J.; West, A.; Cullen, K.A. Notes from the field: E-Cigarette and nicotine pouch use among middle and high school students—United States, 2024. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2024, 73, 774–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vu, A.T.; Taylor, K.M.; Holman, M.R.; Ding, Y.S.; Hearn, B.; Watson, C.H. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the mainstream smoke of popular US cigarettes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2015, 28, 1616–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Riboli, E.; Beland, F.A.; Lachenmeier, D.W.; Marques, M.M.; Phillips, D.H.; Schernhammer, E.; Afghan, A.; Assunção, R.; Caderni, G.; Corton, J.C.; et al. Carcinogenicity of aspartame, methyleugenol, and isoeugenol. Lancet Oncol. 2023, 24, 848–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Back, S.; Masser, A.E.; Rutqvist, L.E.; Lindholm, J. Harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) in two novel nicotine pouch products in comparison with regular smokeless tobacco products and pharmaceutical nicotine replacement therapy products (NRTs). BMC Chem. 2023, 17, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. İnci, M.; Zararsız, İ.; Davarcı, M.; Görür, S. Toxic effects of formaldehyde on the urinary system. Turk. J. Urol. 2013, 39, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Birdsey, J.; Cornelius, M.; Jamal, A.; Park-Lee, E.; Cooper, M.R.; Wang, J.; Sawdey, M.D.; Cullen, K.A.; Neff, L. Tobacco product use among U.S. middle and high school students—National Youth Tobacco Survey, 2023. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2023, 72, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kramer, R.D.; Park-Lee, E.; Marynak, K.L.; Jones, J.T.; Sawdey, M.D.; Cullen, K.A. Nicotine pouch awareness and use among youth, National Youth Tobacco Survey, 2021. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2023, 25, 1610–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rezonzew, G.; Chumley, P.; Feng, W.; Hua, P.; Siegal, G.P.; Jaimes, E.A. Nicotine exposure and the progression of chronic kidney disease: Role of the α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2012, 303, F304–F312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hukkanen, J.; Jacob P 3rd Benowitz, N.L. Metabolism and disposition kinetics of nicotine. Pharmacol. Rev. 2005, 57, 79–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jaimes, E.A.; Tian, R.X.; Joshi, M.S.; Raij, L. Nicotine augments glomerular injury in a rat model of acute nephritis. Am. J. Nephrol. 2009, 29, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Urakawa, N.; Nagata, T.; Kudo, K.; Kimura, K.; Imamura, T. Simultaneous determination of nicotine and cotinine in various human tissues using capillary gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Int. J. Legal Med. 1994, 106, 232–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zheng, C.M.; Lee, Y.H.; Chiu, I.J.; Chiu, Y.J.; Sung, L.C.; Hsu, Y.H.; Chiu, H.W. Nicotine causes nephrotoxicity through the induction of NLRP6 inflammasome and alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Toxics 2020, 8, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yeboah, M.M.; Xue, X.; Duan, B.; Ochani, M.; Tracey, K.J.; Susin, M.; Metz, C.N. Cholinergic agonists attenuate renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Kidney Int. 2008, 74, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, C.S.; Choi, J.S.; Joo, S.Y.; Bae, E.H.; Ma, S.K.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.W. Nicotine-induced apoptosis in human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vickers, A.E.; Rose, K.; Fisher, R.; Saulnier, M.; Sahota, P.; Bentley, P. Kidney slices of human and rat to characterize cisplatin-induced injury on cellular pathways and morphology. Toxicol. Pathol. 2004, 32, 577–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arany, I.; Grifoni, S.; Clark, J.S.; Csongradi, E.; Maric, C.; Juncos, L.A. Chronic nicotine exposure exacerbates acute renal ischemic injury. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2011, 301, F125–F133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Thiele, K.G.; Mattenheimer, H. The isoenzymes of lactate dehydrogenase in the nephron of the healthy human kidney. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 1968, 6, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Roses, J.; Woods, J.E.; Zincke, H. The value of lactic dehydrogenase as a predictor of early allograft survival. Am. J. Surg. 1977, 133, 726–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Anderson, C.B.; Groce, M.A.; Mohapatra, R.N.; Codd, J.E.; Graff, R.J.; Gregory, J.G.; Newton, W.T. Serum lactic dehydrogenase and irreversible renal allograft rejection. Surgery 1976, 79, 161–165. [Google Scholar]
  21. Koyama, Y.; Miyazato, T.; Tsuha, M.; Goya, M.; Kagawa, H.; Miyakawa, A.; Sugaya, K.; Hatano, T.; Ogawa, Y.; Shiraishi, M. Does the high level of lactate dehydrogenase predict renal function and outcome after renal transplantation from non–heart-beating cadaver donors? Transplant. Proc. 2000, 32, 1604–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Green, H.; Tobar, A.; Gafter-Gvili, A.; Leibovici, L.; Klein, T.; Rahamimov, R.; Mor, E.; Grossman, A. Serum lactate dehydrogenase is elevated in ischemic acute tubular necrosis but not in acute rejection in kidney transplant patients. Prog. Transplant. 2017, 27, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sándor, Z.; Katics, D.; Varga, Á.; Kalmár Nagy, K.; Szakály, P. Interpretation of LDH values after kidney transplantation. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Truche, A.S.; Trocme, C.; Vergnaud, S.; Janbon, B.; Giovannini, D.; Malvezzi, P.; Moreau-Gaudry, X.; Rostaing, L.; Tetaz, R. Early prediction of graft outcomes after kidney transplantation from donors after circulatory death: Biomarkers and transplantation characteristics. Transplant. Proc. 2019, 51, 3234–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mezzolla, V.; Pontrelli, P.; Fiorentino, M.; Stasi, A.; Pesce, F.; Franzin, R.; Rascio, F.; Grandaliano, G.; Stallone, G.; Infante, B.; et al. Emerging biomarkers of delayed graft function in kidney transplantation. Transplant. Rev. 2021, 35, 100629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sun, R.; Lv, D.; Xiao, M.; Zhang, L.; Xu, J.; Yu, X.; Zhu, H.; Yang, J. Diagnostic accuracy of the 1,3-beta-D-glucan test and lactate dehydrogenase for pneumocystis pneumonia in non-HIV patients. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (AD) showing the histologic images of the kidney transplant biopsy. (A) Normocellular glomerulus (PAS, 400×). (B) Acute tubular injury: tubular dilatation, cell sloughing, and casts (H&E, 200×). (C) Acute tubular injury: individual tubular cell necrosis (H&E, 400×). (D) Acute tubular injury: tubular epithelial mitotic figures (arrows) (PAS, 630×).
Figure 1. (AD) showing the histologic images of the kidney transplant biopsy. (A) Normocellular glomerulus (PAS, 400×). (B) Acute tubular injury: tubular dilatation, cell sloughing, and casts (H&E, 200×). (C) Acute tubular injury: individual tubular cell necrosis (H&E, 400×). (D) Acute tubular injury: tubular epithelial mitotic figures (arrows) (PAS, 630×).
Medicina 60 01846 g001
Figure 2. Graph showing the serum creatinine and serum LDH values upon admission and at discharge.
Figure 2. Graph showing the serum creatinine and serum LDH values upon admission and at discharge.
Medicina 60 01846 g002
Table 1. Laboratory values at presentation and discharge. ANA: antinuclear antibody; ANCA: anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; C3: complement 3; C4: complement 4; CMV: cytomegalovirus; CK: creatine kinase; CRP: C-reactive protein; EBV: Epstein–Barr virus; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase.
Table 1. Laboratory values at presentation and discharge. ANA: antinuclear antibody; ANCA: anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; C3: complement 3; C4: complement 4; CMV: cytomegalovirus; CK: creatine kinase; CRP: C-reactive protein; EBV: Epstein–Barr virus; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase.
InitialDischarge at 3 Weeks
BUN46 mg/dL96 mg/dL
Serum creatinine6.4 mg/dL6.1 mg/dL
Serum albumin 3.5 g/dL3.4 g/dL
CRP 384.5 mg/L (0–5 mg/L)35.5 mg/L
LDH2227 IU/L (Normal: 135–225 IU/L)488 IU/L
Haptoglobin156 mg/dL (Normal: 40–215 mg/dL)
Peripheral smear schistocytesAbsent
Peripheral blood flowcytometryNegative for malignancy
Direct Coombs testNegative
C3134 mg/dL
C413 mg/dL
ANANegative
ANCANegative
CK<10 U/L
WBC22.9 × 103/uL with left shift, neutrophils 85.6%
Hemoglobin13.2 g/dL
Platelet count175 × 103/uL
BK DNA PCRNot detected
CMV DNA PCRNot detected
EBV DNA PCRNot detected
UrinalysispH 7, specific gravity 1.010, red cells 4 per hpf, 2+ protein, positive glucose, negative nitrites and leukocytes
Urine protein to creatinine ratio 0.8 mg/mg creatinine
Urine beta-2 microglobulin30,000 mcg/L (≤300 mcg/L)
Urine toxicologyNegative
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Acharya, R.; Clapp, W.; Upadhyay, K. Association of Oral Tobacco-Free Nicotine Delivery Product with Acute Renal Tubular Necrosis. Medicina 2024, 60, 1846. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111846

AMA Style

Acharya R, Clapp W, Upadhyay K. Association of Oral Tobacco-Free Nicotine Delivery Product with Acute Renal Tubular Necrosis. Medicina. 2024; 60(11):1846. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111846

Chicago/Turabian Style

Acharya, Ratna, William Clapp, and Kiran Upadhyay. 2024. "Association of Oral Tobacco-Free Nicotine Delivery Product with Acute Renal Tubular Necrosis" Medicina 60, no. 11: 1846. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111846

APA Style

Acharya, R., Clapp, W., & Upadhyay, K. (2024). Association of Oral Tobacco-Free Nicotine Delivery Product with Acute Renal Tubular Necrosis. Medicina, 60(11), 1846. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111846

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop