Next Article in Journal
Novel Models for Assessing and Pathophysiology of Hepatic Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury Mechanisms
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence, Management, and Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation in Paediatric Patients: Insights from a Tertiary Cardiology Centre
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship between Cancer and Intention to Leave Work among Older Workers: A Cross-Sectional Internet-Based Study

1
Department of Work Systems and Health, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan
2
Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2024, 60(9), 1506; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091506
Submission received: 14 August 2024 / Revised: 13 September 2024 / Accepted: 13 September 2024 / Published: 15 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Public Health and Healthcare Management for Chronic Care)

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Limited research has focused on the relationship between cancer, job loss, and factors associated with job loss among older workers. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between cancer and intention to leave and between physical-health-related issues, mental-health-related issues, and cancer-related symptoms and intention to leave among older workers with cancer. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional internet-based study included 4498 workers aged 60–75 years. Intention to leave was assessed based on whether individuals considered quitting their current jobs in the near future. Results: A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between cancer and intention to leave (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–2.00, p = 0.045). In addition, physical-health-related issues (aOR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.10–4.92, p = 0.026) and mental-health-related issues (aOR: 4.44, 95% CI: 1.80–10.98, p = 0.001) were significantly associated with the intention to leave. Conclusions: Healthcare providers and employers must address the physical- and mental-health-related issues facing older workers with cancer to help them secure their employment.

1. Introduction

The diagnosis and treatment of cancer significantly impact individuals’ lives. Recent advances in medicine, especially in high-income countries, have improved the survival rates of patients with cancer [1,2,3], highlighting the importance of research on the social and occupational challenges faced by survivors of cancer. Unemployment is a critical issue among survivors of cancer. Survivors of cancer have a higher rate of job loss than the general population [4,5,6], and unemployment can lead to financial toxicity [7,8,9] and a reduction in quality of life [10,11,12,13,14]. Therefore, the demand for strategies to avoid unemployment among patients with cancer is increasing.
Notably, several factors have been associated with unemployment among survivors of cancer. Personal factors include older age [6,14,15,16,17], female sex [6,18], low educational level [6,19], lower income level [18,19], physically or mentally demanding work [17,19], clinical stage [15,16,19], and type of treatment [15,16,17,19]. The modifiable factors include physical-health-related issues such as low fitness levels and poor physical function [17], mental-health-related issues such as depression [20], and cancer-related symptoms such as fatigue and pain [21,22,23,24,25]. Therefore, healthcare providers, employers, and occupational health staff should address these physical- and mental-health-related issues and cancer-related symptoms to prevent job loss among patients with cancer.
The incidence of cancer is closely associated with aging, peaking in the population in their 60s and 70s [26,27]. Furthermore, the rise in the aging population and retirement-age groups in developed countries has led to a corresponding increase in the proportion of older workers in the labor market [28]. At the intersection of these trends, the employment challenges faced by older survivors of cancer are expected to become increasingly significant. However, limited research has focused on the relationship between cancer, job loss, and factors associated with job loss among older workers. In the present study, we aimed to (1) clarify whether cancer is associated with intentions to leave work among older workers and (2) identify whether physical- and mental-health-related issues and cancer-related symptoms are associated with intentions to leave work among workers with cancer.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

This cross-sectional internet-based study was conducted to explore the employment and health challenges faced by older workers [29]. The survey targeted workers aged 60–75 years who were employed in the tertiary sector and registered with Cross Marketing Inc. (Tokyo, Japan).
On 1 September 2022, invitations were sent via email or other methods to those panelists who, at the time of their registration, indicated they were employed. The criteria for exclusion included (1) unemployment at the time of the survey, (2) being younger than 60 years or older than 75 years, (3) being self-employed or a family member actively participating in a family business, (4) not working in the tertiary sector as defined by the Indices of Tertiary Industry Activity in Japan, and (5) incorrect answers to a control question designed to filter out unreliable data: “Identify the third largest number from a list of five numbers”. The recruitment process concluded on 9 September 2022, with the target of 5000 participants met. Fifty-two individuals who anticipated imminent retirement due to reasons such as reaching retirement age or contract termination for the purposes of this research were excluded, resulting in a final sample size of 4948 participants. All the participants provided informed consent online through a survey interface. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (R4-031).

2.2. Assessment of the Prevalence of Cancer

All participants were asked the question, “What illnesses do you have that require outpatient visits or treatment?”. Those who responded “yes” to the option for cancer were considered diagnosed with cancer.

2.3. Assessment of Physical, Mental, and Symptomatic Health-Related Issues

In this study, we investigated the health-related problems faced by the participants that prevented them from continuing their current employment. Notably, we focused on physical- and mental-health-related issues and cancer-related symptoms. The participants were asked the question, “What kind of problems are you encountering in order to continue your current job?”. Subsequently, the participants were presented with three items: “physical fitness-related problems”, “mental health-related problems”, and “problems associated with cancer-related symptoms”. For each item, the participants were required to respond with either “Yes” or “No”. This approach allowed for ascertaining the various health-related challenges encountered by survivors of cancer in their workplace and quantitatively assessing these barriers to sustained employment.

2.4. Assessment of Intention to Leave Work

We assessed the participants’ intention to leave using the question “Do you intend to leave your current job in the near future?” with the following response options: “Sure”, “I think so”, or “Definitely yes”. If the participants answered, “I think so” or “definitely yes”, they were deemed to have the intention to leave.

2.5. Assessment of Other Variables

The following variables were considered as covariates and were adjusted for in the analysis: age, gender, educational background (junior high school/high school, vocational school/junior college/technical college, and university/graduate school), employment status (regular or non-regular employment), job description (mainly or not mainly manual work), work frequency (≤3, 4, and ≥5 days/week), and company size (<10, 10–99, 100–999, ≥1000 employees).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All data were expressed as categorical variables using numerical values and percentages. First, a logistic regression analysis involving all participants was performed, with the intention to leave as the dependent variable and the prevalence of cancer as the independent variable. Age, gender, educational background, employment status, job description, work frequency, and company size were used as covariates to adjust for potential confounders. Next, a subsequent logistic regression analysis involving participants with cancer, with the intention to leave as the dependent variable and each health-related problem as the independent variable, was performed. Age, gender, educational background, employment status, job description, work frequency, and company size were used as covariates to adjust for potential confounders. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 18.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

Table 1 presents the participants’ characteristics. The prevalence of cancer was 59.1% (154/4948). The cancer group had a higher proportion of individuals aged >70 years (12.3% vs. 9.5%) and a higher percentage of those with non-regular employment (63.0% vs. 58.2%) than the non-cancer group. Table 2 presents the proportion of participants with intentions to leave their jobs according to their cancer status, along with the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the association between cancer and the intention to leave a job. The proportion of participants who intended to leave was higher in the cancer group than in the non-cancer group (33.1% vs. 26.2%). The multivariate logistic regression analysis results indicated that cancer was significantly associated with the intentions to leave (aOR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.01–2.00, p = 0.045).
Table 3 presents the characteristics of the participants with cancer. Of the 154 participants with cancer, 51 (33.1%) intended to leave their jobs. The group with intentions to leave had a higher proportion of workers who worked >5 days weekly than the group without such intentions (70.6% vs. 66.0%). Table 4 presents the prevalence of health-related problems associated with the intention to leave a job and the aOR and 95% CI for the association between each health-related problem and the intention to leave a job. The prevalence of physical (40.7% vs. 24.7%) and mental (62.1% vs. 27.2%) health-related problems was significantly higher in the group with the intention to leave than in the group without this intention. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that physical (aOR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.10–4.92, p = 0.026) and mental (aOR: 4.44, 95% CI: 1.80–10.98, p = 0.001) health-related problems were significantly associated with the intention to leave. However, problems associated with cancer-related symptoms were not significantly associated with the intention to leave (aOR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.49–2.11, p = 0.969).

4. Discussion

The present cross-sectional study revealed that cancer was associated with the intention to leave work among older workers. Furthermore, physical- and mental-health-related issues were associated with the intention to leave among older workers with cancer. These findings suggest the need for physical and mental health support to facilitate the sustained employment of older workers with cancer. The present study is novel because it examined factors associated with the intention to leave among older workers who are survivors of cancer.
The present study found a significant association between cancer and the intention to leave work among older workers. These results are consistent with those of previous studies indicating a higher risk of job loss among survivors of cancer than among the general population [4,5,6], supporting the notion that unemployment among survivors of cancer can lead to serious consequences such as financial toxicity and a decline in the quality of life [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Medical and occupational health interventions are required to mitigate these negative effects in older workers with cancer.
The present study also highlighted a significant relationship between physical- and mental-health-related issues and the intention to leave among older survivors of cancer. Physical limitations may restrict older workers’ abilities to meet the physical demands of their workplace, and mental-health-related issues may further impair their adaptability and performance. These factors may be associated with a decrease in cancer survivors’ work ability [30,31,32], potentially triggering the intention to leave. Physical- and mental-health-related issues are not exclusive to older survivors of cancer; however, aging may exacerbate these issues. Preventive measures can include multidisciplinary interventions initiated during cancer treatment [33], such as occupational physical exercise, counseling, and psychosocial support at work to facilitate sustained employment.
In contrast, issues associated with cancer-related symptoms were not associated with the intention to leave among older workers who were survivors of cancer. This finding is inconsistent with that of previous studies, namely that cancer-related symptoms are associated with job loss [21,22,23,24,25]. This discrepancy can be attributed to the healthy worker effect, as our survey targeted employed individuals, possibly underestimating the association between symptoms and the intention to leave. In addition, symptoms such as fatigue may have been perceived as physical weakness rather than cancer-related symptoms, potentially leading to an underestimation of their impact on the intention to leave a job. The association between cancer-related symptoms and the intention to leave work was negative in the present study; however, these symptoms have been associated with work outcomes such as loss of productivity [17,30,32,34,35,36,37], emphasizing their importance in the context of sustained employment.
This study has some limitations that warrant further consideration. First, the generalizability of the study findings is limited. We did not consider cancer progression, resulting in the likely underrepresentation of patients with advanced cancer, making the results less applicable to those with severe conditions. This study focused only on tertiary sector workers, so whether these findings apply to those in more physically demanding industries is unclear. Additionally, owing to the recruitment of participants through an internet survey, we could not rule out the possibility that the target population was biased toward relatively well-educated older workers with access to the internet, as well as older adults who are interested in their health. This study targeted only currently employed individuals aged 60–75, who are generally healthier, potentially underestimating the true impact of cancer on employment. Second, this was a cross-sectional study and may not be suitable for drawing causal inferences. However, causal inferences are unlikely to be reversed in the case of the relationship between cancer and intention to leave employment and between physical and mental problems and intention to leave among patients with cancer. In fact, analyses using panel data also suggest that unemployment itself does not affect health, but health problems are associated with unemployment [38]. Third, this study has unmeasured confounding factors. For example, workplaces with good job flexibility and robust occupational health support systems might reduce the impact of cancer and cancer-related health issues on the intention to leave. Conversely, the impact may be more pronounced in workplaces lacking such flexibility and support systems. However, this study does not account for these factors. Future analyses should consider the role of job flexibility and occupational health support systems when examining the effect of cancer and cancer-related health problems on turnover intention. Finally, the results of this study represent the intention to leave, not actual retirement. How many older workers who have the intention to leave the workforce actually leave is unclear, but it is possible that the percentage is small. Therefore, it is not clear how much of an impact a cancer diagnosis or cancer-related health problem has on actual retirement. Future prospective cohort studies are needed to examine the relationship between physical health problems, mental health problems, and cancer-related symptoms and the actual rate of leaving.

5. Conclusions

This study elucidated the impact of cancer on the intention to leave work among older workers, highlighting the pivotal role of physical- and mental-health-related issues. The findings suggest that a comprehensive approach to improving physical and mental health is necessary to support the sustained employment of older survivors of cancer. The development of such a comprehensive approach is urgently needed in many developed countries with aging workforces.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M.; methodology, R.M. and S.M.; software, R.M.; formal analysis, R.M.; investigation, R.M. and S.M.; resources, R.M. and S.M.; data curation, R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M.; writing—review and editing, R.M., S.M. and A.O.; supervision, S.M.; project administration, R.M.; funding acquisition, R.M. and A.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Japan Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprise Welfare Foundation and the Fukuoka Public Health Promotion Organization Center Research Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (approval number: R4-031; approval date: 1 September 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

All participants provided informed consent online through the survey interface.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Arnold, M.; Rutherford, M.J.; Bardot, A.; Ferlay, J.; Andersson, T.M.; Myklebust, T.Å.; Tervonen, H.; Thursfield, V.; Ransom, D.; Shack, L.; et al. Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995–2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): A population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 1493–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Allemani, C.; Matsuda, T.; Di Carlo, V.; Harewood, R.; Matz, M.; Nikšić, M.; Bonaventure, A.; Valkov, M.; Johnson, C.J.; Estève, J.; et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): Analysis of individual records for 37,513,025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet 2018, 391, 1023–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. De Angelis, R.; Sant, M.; Coleman, M.P.; Francisci, S.; Baili, P.; Pierannunzio, D.; Trama, A.; Visser, O.; Brenner, H.; Ardanaz, E.; et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: Results of EUROCARE—5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. de Boer, A.G.; Taskila, T.; Ojajärvi, A.; van Dijk, F.J.; Verbeek, J.H. Cancer survivors and unemployment: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA 2009, 301, 753–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mehnert, A. Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2011, 77, 109–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chimienti, M.; Morlino, G.; Ingravalle, F.; Vinci, A.; Colarusso, E.; De Santo, C.; Formosa, V.; Gentile, L.; Lorusso, G.; Mosconi, C.; et al. Unemployment status subsequent to cancer diagnosis and therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers 2023, 15, 1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Honda, K.; Gyawali, B.; Ando, M.; Kumanishi, R.; Kato, K.; Sugiyama, K.; Mitani, S.; Masuishi, T.; Narita, Y.; Bando, H.; et al. Prospective survey of financial toxicity measured by the comprehensive score for financial toxicity in Japanese patients with cancer. J. Glob. Oncol. 2019, 5, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mols, F.; Tomalin, B.; Pearce, A.; Kaambwa, B.; Koczwara, B. Financial toxicity and employment status in cancer survivors. A systematic literature review. Support Care Cancer 2020, 28, 5693–5708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pearce, A.; Tomalin, B.; Kaambwa, B.; Horevoorts, N.; Duijts, S.; Mols, F.; van de Poll-Franse, L.; Koczwara, B. Financial toxicity is more than costs of care: The relationship between employment and financial toxicity in long-term cancer survivors. J. Cancer Surviv. 2019, 13, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Andreu, Y.; Martínez, P.; Soto-Rubio, A.; Pérez-Marín, M.; Cervantes, A.; Arribas, L. Quality of life in cancer survivorship: Sociodemographic and disease-related moderators. Eur. J. Cancer Care 2022, 31, e13692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tamminga, S.J.; Jansen, L.P.; Frings-Dresen, M.H.W.; de Boer, A.G.E.M. Long-term employment status and quality of life after cancer: A longitudinal prospective cohort study from diagnosis up to and including 5 years post diagnosis. Work 2020, 66, 901–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Duijts, S.F.; Kieffer, J.M.; van Muijen, P.; van der Beek, A.J. Sustained employability and health-related quality of life in cancer survivors up to four years after diagnosis. Acta. Oncol. 2017, 56, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Andreu, Y.; Picazo, C.; Murgui, S.; Soto-Rubio, A.; García-Conde, A.; Romero, R. Exploring the independent association of employment status to cancer survivors’ health-related quality of life. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2023, 21, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bahlburg, H.; Reike, M.; Tully, K.; Bach, P.; Butea-Bocu, M.C.; Roghmann, F.; Noldus, J.; Müller, G. Return to work improves quality of life and reduces psychosocial distress after radical cystectomy: Data from a contemporary series of 230 German patients. J. Cancer Surviv. 2023, 18, 1426–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, S.W.; Chen, W.L.; Wu, W.T.; Wang, C.C. Investigation on returning to work in liver cancer survivors in Taiwan: A 5-year follow-up study. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yuan, C.M.; Wang, C.C.; Wu, W.T.; Ho, C.L.; Chen, W.L. Risk factors for return to work in colorectal cancer survivors. Cancer Med. 2021, 10, 3938–3951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. So, S.C.Y.; Ng, D.W.L.; Liao, Q.; Fielding, R.; Soong, I.; Chan, K.K.L.; Lee, C.; Ng, A.W.Y.; Sze, W.K.; Chan, W.L.; et al. Return to work and work productivity during the first year after cancer treatment. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 866346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kang, D.; Bae, K.R.; Kim, H.Y.; Ahn, Y.; Kim, N.; Shim, Y.; Sohn, T.S.; Lee, W.Y.; Baek, J.H.; Kweon, S.S.; et al. Changes in working status after cancer diagnosis and socio-demographic, clinical, work-related, and psychological factors associated with it. BMC Cancer 2022, 22, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, L.; Hong, B.Y.; Kennedy, S.A.; Chang, Y.; Hong, C.J.; Craigie, S.; Kwon, H.Y.; Romerosa, B.; Couban, R.J.; Reid, S.; et al. Predictors of unemployment after breast cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 1868–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dahl, A.A.; Fosså, S.D.; Lie, H.C.; Loge, J.H.; Reinertsen, K.V.; Ruud, E.; Kiserud, C.E. Employment status and work ability in long-term young adult cancer survivors. J. Adolesc. Young Adult Oncol. 2019, 8, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alleaume, C.; Bendiane, M.K.; Bouhnik, A.D.; Rey, D.; Cortaredona, S.; Seror, V.; Peretti-Watel, P. Chronic neuropathic pain negatively associated with employment retention of cancer survivors: Evidence from a national French survey. J. Cancer Surviv. 2018, 12, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Behringer, K.; Goergen, H.; Müller, H.; Thielen, I.; Brillant, C.; Kreissl, S.; Halbsguth, T.V.; Meissner, J.; Greil, R.; Moosmann, P.; et al. Cancer-related fatigue in patients with and survivors of hodgkin lymphoma: The impact on treatment outcome and social reintegration. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 4329–4337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cox-Martin, E.; Anderson-Mellies, A.; Borges, V.; Bradley, C. Chronic pain, health-related quality of life, and employment in working-age cancer survivors. J. Cancer Surviv. 2020, 14, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kerns, S.L.; Fung, C.; Fossa, S.D.; Dinh, J.; Paul, C.; Monahan, P.; Sesso, H.D.; Frisina, R.D.; Feldman, D.R.; Hamilton, R.J.; et al. Relationship of cisplatin-related adverse health outcomes with disability and unemployment among testicular cancer survivors. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020, 4, pkaa022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lindbohm, M.L.; Kuosma, E.; Taskila, T.; Hietanen, P.; Carlsen, K.; Gudbergsson, S.; Gunnarsdottir, H. Early retirement and non-employment after breast cancer. Psychooncology 2014, 23, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. GBD 2019 Asia and All Cancers Collaborators. Temporal patterns of cancer burden in Asia, 1990–2019: A systematic examination for the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study. Lancet Reg. Health Southeast Asia 2024, 21, 100333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. GBD 2019 Colorectal Cancer Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer and its risk factors, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 7, 627–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. OECD. Pensions at a Glance 2019: OECD and G20 Indicators. 2019. Available online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/b6d3dcfc-en/index.html?itemId=/content/publication/b6d3dcfc-en (accessed on 20 February 2024).
  29. Matsugaki, R.; Matsuzaki, H.; Saeki, S.; Fujino, Y.; Matsuda, S. Frailty and occupational falls among older Japanese workers: An Internet-based cross-sectional study. J. Occup. Health 2023, 65, e12424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fardell, J.E.; Tan, S.Y.C.; Kerin-Ayres, K.; Dhillon, H.M.; Vardy, J.L. Symptom clusters in survivorship and their impact on ability to work among cancer survivors. Cancers 2023, 15, 5119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, S.; Kissane, D.W.; Richardson, G.; Senior, J.; Morgan, J.; Gregory, P.; Birks, S.; Ooi, C.; Lipton, L.; Antill, Y.; et al. The role of depression and other psychological factors in work ability among breast cancer survivors in Australia. Psychooncology 2022, 31, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ambali Parambil, N.; Kannan, S. Work ability, anxiety, and depression among long-term breast cancer survivors of Northern Kerala, India; A historical cohort study. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2024, 25, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Leensen, M.C.J.; Groeneveld, I.F.; van der Heide, I.; Rejda, T.; van Veldhoven, P.L.J.; Berkel, S.V.; Snoek, A.; Harten, W.V.; Frings-Dresen, M.H.W.; de Boer, A.G.E.M. Return to work of cancer patients after a multidisciplinary intervention including occupational counselling and physical exercise in cancer patients: A prospective study in the Netherlands. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e014746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tan, C.J.; Yip, S.Y.C.; Chan, R.J.; Chew, L.; Chan, A. Investigating how cancer-related symptoms influence work outcomes among cancer survivors: A systematic review. J. Cancer Surviv. 2022, 16, 1065–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dorland, H.F.; Abma, F.I.; Van Zon, S.K.R.; Stewart, R.E.; Amick, B.C.; Ranchor, A.V.; Roelen, C.A.M.; Bültmann, U. Fatigue and depressive symptoms improve but remain negatively related to work functioning over 18 months after return to work in cancer patients. J. Cancer Surviv. 2018, 12, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wolvers, M.D.J.; Leensen, M.C.J.; Groeneveld, I.F.; Frings-Dresen, M.H.W.; De Boer, A.G.E.M. Longitudinal associations between fatigue and perceived work ability in cancer survivors. J. Occup. Rehabil. 2019, 29, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vandraas, K.; Falk, R.S.; Bøhn, S.K.H.; Kiserud, C.; Lie, H.C.; Smedsland, S.K.; Ewertz, M.; Dahl, S.; Brekke, M.; Reinertsen, K.V. Work ability 8 years after breast cancer: Exploring the role of social support in a nation-wide survey. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2022, 193, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Böckerman, P.; Ilmakunnas, P. Unemployment and self-assessed health: Evidence from panel data. Health Econ. 2009, 18, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Participants’ characteristics.
Table 1. Participants’ characteristics.
Total (n = 4948)Cancer
Without (n = 4794)With (n = 154)
Age
    60–643348 (67.7%)3257 (67.9%)91 (59.1%)
    65–691127 (22.8%)1083 (22.6%)44 (28.6%)
    70–75473 (9.6%)454 (9.5%)19 (12.3%)
Gender
    Men2474 (50.0%)2399 (50.0%)75 (48.7%)
    Women2474 (50.0%)2395 (50.0%)79 (51.3%)
Educational background
    Junior high school/high school1432 (28.9%)1387 (28.9%)45 (29.2%)
    Vocational school/college1107 (22.4%)1069 (22.3%)38 (24.7%)
    University2409 (48.7%)2338 (48.8%)71 (46.1%)
Employment status
    Regular employment2060 (41.6%)2003 (41.8%)57 (37.0%)
    Non-regular employment2888 (58.4%)2791 (58.2%)97 (63.0%)
Job description
    Not mainly manual work3374 (68.2%)3271 (68.2%)103 (66.9%)
    Mainly manual work1574 (31.8%)1523 (31.8%)51 (33.1%)
Work frequency (day/week)
    ≤3889 (18.0%)862 (18.0%)27 (17.5%)
    4722 (14.6%)699 (14.6%)23 (14.9%)
    ≥53337 (67.4%)3233 (67.4%)104 (67.5%)
Company size (employees)
    Micro-scale (<10)686 (13.9%)665 (13.9%)21 (13.6%)
    Small-scale (10–49)1044 (21.1%)1012 (21.1%)32 (20.8%)
    Medium-scale (50–999)2018 (40.8%)1956 (40.8%)62 (40.3%)
    Large-scale (≥1000)1200 (24.3%)1161 (24.2%)39 (25.3%)
Table 2. Association between cancer and intention to leave (n = 4948).
Table 2. Association between cancer and intention to leave (n = 4948).
Intention to LeaveAge and Gender AdjustedMultivariate Adjusted *
aOR95% CIp-ValueaOR95% CIp-Value
Cancer
    Without (n = 4794)26.2% (1255/4794)ReferenceReference
    With (n = 154)33.1% (51/154)1.421.012.000.0431.421.012.000.045
* Adjusted for age, gender, educational background, employment status, job description, work frequency, and company size. aOR, adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Table 3. Characteristics of participants with cancer.
Table 3. Characteristics of participants with cancer.
Total (n = 154)Intention to Leave
No (n = 103)Yes (n = 51)
Age
    60–6491 (59.1%)65 (63.1%)26 (51.0%)
    65–6944 (28.6%)26 (25.2%)18 (35.3%)
    70–7519 (12.3%)12 (11.7%)7 (13.7%)
Gender
    Men75 (48.7%)50 (48.5%)25 (49.0%)
    Women79 (51.3%)53 (51.5%)26 (51.0%)
Educational background
    Junior high school/high school45 (29.2%)29 (28.2%)16 (31.4%)
    Vocational school/college38 (24.7%)27 (26.2%)11 (21.6%)
    University71 (46.1%)47 (45.6%)24 (47.1%)
Employment status
    Regular employment57 (37.0%)39 (37.9%)18 (35.3%)
    Non-regular employment97 (63.0%)64 (62.1%)33 (64.7%)
Job description
    Not mainly manual work103 (66.9%)68 (66.0%)35 (68.6%)
    Mainly manual work51 (33.1%)35 (34.0%)16 (31.4%)
Work frequency (day/week)
    ≤327 (17.5%)19 (18.4%)8 (15.7%)
    423 (14.9%)16 (15.5%)7 (13.7%)
    ≥5104 (67.5%)68 (66.0%)36 (70.6%)
Company size (employees)
    Micro-scale (<10)21 (13.6%)12 (11.7%)9 (17.6%)
    Small-scale (10–49)32 (20.8%)25 (24.3%)7 (13.7%)
    Medium-scale (50–999)62 (40.3%)40 (38.8%)22 (43.1%)
    Large-scale (≥1000)39 (25.3%)26 (25.2%)13 (25.5%)
Table 4. Association of physical-health-related issues, mental-health-related issues, and cancer-related symptoms with the intention to leave (n = 154).
Table 4. Association of physical-health-related issues, mental-health-related issues, and cancer-related symptoms with the intention to leave (n = 154).
Intention to LeaveAge-Gender AdjustedMultivariate Adjusted *
aOR95% CIp-ValueaOR95% CIp-Value
Physical-health-related issue
        Without (n = 73)24.7% (18/73)ReferenceReference
        With (n = 81)40.7% (33/81)2.091.044.230.0392.331.104.920.026
Mental-health-related issue
        Without (n = 125)27.2% (34/125)ReferenceReference
        With (n = 29)62.1% (18/29)3.691.598.580.0024.441.8010.980.001
Cancer-related symptoms
        Without (n = 99)33.3% (33/99)ReferenceReference
        With (n = 55)32.7% (18/55)1.030.512.090.9371.010.492.110.969
* Adjusted for age, gender, educational background, employment status, job description, work frequency, and company size. aOR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matsugaki, R.; Matsuda, S.; Ogami, A. Relationship between Cancer and Intention to Leave Work among Older Workers: A Cross-Sectional Internet-Based Study. Medicina 2024, 60, 1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091506

AMA Style

Matsugaki R, Matsuda S, Ogami A. Relationship between Cancer and Intention to Leave Work among Older Workers: A Cross-Sectional Internet-Based Study. Medicina. 2024; 60(9):1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091506

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matsugaki, Ryutaro, Shinya Matsuda, and Akira Ogami. 2024. "Relationship between Cancer and Intention to Leave Work among Older Workers: A Cross-Sectional Internet-Based Study" Medicina 60, no. 9: 1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091506

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop