Next Article in Journal
The Unmet Needs of Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Maximal Isometric or Eccentric Hamstring Strength—Which Test Modality Might Be More Suitable for Assessments in Youth Alpine Ski Racers?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Knowledge and Practice of Health Professionals in the Management of Dysphagia

by
Eduardo Sánchez-Sánchez
1,*,
Ylenia Avellaneda-López
1,
Esperanza García-Marín
1,
Guillermo Ramírez-Vargas
1,
Jara Díaz-Jimenez
2 and
Francisco Javier Ordonez
3
1
Internal Medicine Department, Punta de Europa Hospital, Algeciras, 11207 Cádiz, Spain
2
Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cádiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain
3
Human Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Cádiz, Plaza Fragela s/n, 11003 Cádiz, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(4), 2139; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042139
Submission received: 5 January 2021 / Revised: 8 February 2021 / Accepted: 17 February 2021 / Published: 22 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Health Behavior, Chronic Disease and Health Promotion)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine healthcare providers’ knowledge and practices about dysphagia. A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out based on a self-administered and anonymous questionnaire addressed to healthcare providers in Spain. A total of 396 healthcare providers participated in the study. Of these, 62.3% knew the definition of dysphagia as a swallowing disorder. In addition, up to 39.2% of the participants reported that they did not know whether the EatingAssessmentTool (EAT-10) dysphagia screening test was usedin their own clinical settings. Similarly, up to 49.1% of them did not know the ClinicalExaminationVolume-Viscosity (MECV-V) method. Nearly all participants (98.8%) reported that thickeners must be used forall liquids administered to patients. A higher percentage of respondents based the choice of texture on patient’s tolerance (78.2%) rather than on the MECV-V result (17.3%). In addition,76.4% of the professionals had witnessed a bronchoaspiration; after it, 44.4% (n = 175) of them reported the appearance of pneumonia, and 14.5% (n = 57) the death of the patient (p = 0.005). The participants revealeda moderate/low knowledge ofthe definition, diagnosis, and clinical management of liquid dysphagia, which indicates some room for improvements.
Keywords: bronchoaspiration; dysphagia; MECV-V; pneumonia; health professionals bronchoaspiration; dysphagia; MECV-V; pneumonia; health professionals

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sánchez-Sánchez, E.; Avellaneda-López, Y.; García-Marín, E.; Ramírez-Vargas, G.; Díaz-Jimenez, J.; Ordonez, F.J. Knowledge and Practice of Health Professionals in the Management of Dysphagia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042139

AMA Style

Sánchez-Sánchez E, Avellaneda-López Y, García-Marín E, Ramírez-Vargas G, Díaz-Jimenez J, Ordonez FJ. Knowledge and Practice of Health Professionals in the Management of Dysphagia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(4):2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sánchez-Sánchez, Eduardo, Ylenia Avellaneda-López, Esperanza García-Marín, Guillermo Ramírez-Vargas, Jara Díaz-Jimenez, and Francisco Javier Ordonez. 2021. "Knowledge and Practice of Health Professionals in the Management of Dysphagia" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 4: 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042139

APA Style

Sánchez-Sánchez, E., Avellaneda-López, Y., García-Marín, E., Ramírez-Vargas, G., Díaz-Jimenez, J., & Ordonez, F. J. (2021). Knowledge and Practice of Health Professionals in the Management of Dysphagia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop