Design and Validation of a Virtual Physical Education and Sport Science–Related Course: A Learner’s Engagement Approach
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Conceptual Framework
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Course Implementation and Data Collection Procedure
2.3. Measures of Success upon Course Completion
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Practical Implication
7. Limitations of the Study
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Simmons, J.R. Distance learning: Education or economics? Int. J. Value-Based Manag. 2001, 14, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angolia, M.G.; Pagliari, L.R. Factors for successful evolution and sustainability of quality distance education. Online J. Distance Learn. Adm. 2016, 19. [Google Scholar]
- Seaman, J.E.; Allen, I.E.; Seaman, J. Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States; Babson Survey Research Group: Babson Park, MA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Roffe, I. E-learning: Engagement, enhancement and execution. Qual. Assur. Educ. 2002, 10, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raes, A.; Vanneste, P.; Pieters, M.; Windey, I.; Van Den Noortgate, W.; Depaepe, F. Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Comput. Educ. 2020, 143, 103682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyer, C.M. Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practices in Higher Education; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Feldman, K.A. What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. J. High. Educ. 1994, 65, 615–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Astin, A.W. What Matters in College? Jossey-Bass: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Hew, K.F. Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2016, 47, 320–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woo, Y.; Reeves, T.C. Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. Internet High Educ. 2007, 10, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagannathan, U.; Blair, R. Engage the disengaged: Strategies for addressing the expectations of today’s online millennials. Distance Learn. 2013, 10, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Harris, L.R. A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning. Aust. Educ. Res. 2008, 35, 57–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasiewski, J.A.; Eagan, M.K.; Garcia, G.A.; Hurtado, S.; Chang, M.J. From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Res. High Educ. 2012, 53, 229–261. [Google Scholar]
- Shaari, A.S.; Yusoff, N.M.; Ghazali, I.M.; Osman, R.H.; Dzahir, N.F.M. The relationship between lecturers’ teaching style and students’ academic engagement. Procedia-Social Behav. Sci. 2014, 118, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garrison, D.R.; Anderson, T.; Archer, W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. Am. J. Distance Educ. 2001, 15, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garrison, D.R.; Arbaugh, J.B. Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet High Educ. 2007, 10, 157–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lear, J.L.; Ansorge, C.; Steckelberg, A. Interactivity/community process model for the online education environment. J. Online Learn. Teach. 2010, 6, 71–77. [Google Scholar]
- Rourke, L.; Anderson, T.; Garrison, D.R.; Archer, W. Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. J. Distance Educ. 1999, 14, 50–71. [Google Scholar]
- Shea, P.; Bidjerano, T. Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Comput. Educ. 2009, 52, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cochran, J.D.; Campbell, S.M.; Baker, H.M.; Leeds, E.M. The role of student characteristics in predicting retention in online courses. Res. High Educ. 2014, 55, 27–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynch, T.; Soukup, G.J., Sr. Primary physical education (PE): School leader perceptions about classroom teacher quality implementation. Cogent. Educ. 2017, 4, 1348925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, H.E.; Atkin, A.J.; Panter, J.; Wong, G.; Chinapaw, M.J.M.; Van Sluijs, E.M.F. Family-based interventions to increase physical activity in children: A systematic review, meta-analysis and realist synthesis. Obes. Rev. 2016, 17, 345–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chzhen, Y.; Moor, I.; Pickett, W.; Toczydlowska, E.; Stevens, G.W.J.M. International trends in ‘bottom-end’inequality in adolescent physical activity and nutrition: HBSC study 2002–2014. Eur. J. Public Health 2018, 28, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, S.U.; Algahtani, F.D.; Zrieq, R.; Aldhmadi, B.K.; Atta, A.; Obeidat, R.M.; Kadri, A. Academic self-perception and course satisfaction among university students taking virtual classes during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Kingdom of Saudi-Arabia (KSA). Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Oliveira Dias, M.; Lopes, R.; Teles, A.C. Will virtual replace classroom teaching? Lessons from virtual classes via zoom in the times of COVID-19. J. Adv. Educ. Philos. 2020, 4, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furtak, E.M.; Kunter, M. Effects of autonomy-supportive teaching on student learning and motivation. J. Exp. Educ. 2012, 80, 284–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yates, A.; Starkey, L.; Egerton, B.; Flueggen, F. High school students’ experience of online learning during COVID-19: The influence of technology and pedagogy. Technol. Pedagog. Educ. 2021, 30, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajabalee, Y.B.; Santally, M.I. Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021, 26, 2623–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schunk, D.H.; Ertmer, P.A. Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In Handbook of Self-Regulation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 631–649. [Google Scholar]
- Rychetnik, L.; Hawe, P.; Waters, E.; Barratt, A.; Frommer, M. A glossary for evidence based public health. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2004, 58, 538–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013, 310, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Albert, A.; Hallowel, M.R. Revamping occupational safety and health training: Integrating andragogical principles for the adult learner. Australas J. Constr. Econ. Build. 2013, 13, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gülseçen, S.; Kubat, A. Teaching ICT to teacher candidates using PBL: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2006, 9, 96–106. [Google Scholar]
- Oliván Blázquez, B.; Masluk, B.; Gascon, S.; Fueyo Díaz, R.; Aguilar-Latorre, A.; Artola Magallón, I.; Magallón Botaya, R. The use of flipped classroom as an active learning approach improves academic performance in social work: A randomized trial in a university. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McDonald, K.; Smith, C.M. The flipped classroom for professional development: Part I. Benefits and strategies. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs. 2013, 44, 437–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, K.S.; Monrouxe, L.; Lu, Y.H.; Jenq, C.C.; Chang, Y.J.; Chang, Y.C.; Chai, P.Y. Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: A meta-analysis. Med. Educ. 2018, 52, 910–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chen, F.; Lui, A.M.; Martinelli, S.M. A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Med. Educ. 2017, 51, 585–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qadir, J.; Al-Fuqaha, A. A Student Primer on How to Thrive in Engineering Education during and beyond COVID-19. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cañas, A.J.; Reiska, P.; Mollits, A. Developing higher-order thinking skills with concept mapping: A case of pedagogic frailty. Knowl. Manag. E-Learn. Int. J. 2017, 9, 348–365. [Google Scholar]
- Fergusson, L. Learning by… Knowledge and skills acquisition through work-based learning and research. J. Work-Appl. Manag. 2022. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keller, J.; Suzuki, K. Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. J. Educ. Media 2004, 29, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilkins, J.R. Construction workers’ perceptions of health and safety training programmes. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2011, 29, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T. The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT J. Online Learn. Teach. 2015, 11, 309–319. [Google Scholar]
- Keller, J.M. Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Perform. Instr. 1987, 26, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- KeIIer, J.M. The systematic process of motivational design. Perform. Instr. 1987, 26, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Muazu Musa, R.; Abdul Majeed, A.P.P.; Abdullah, M.R.; Ab Nasir, A.F.; Arif Hassan, M.H.; Mohd Razman, M.A. Technical and tactical performance indicators discriminating winning and losing team in elite Asian beach soccer tournament. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cuzick, J. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat. Med. 1985, 4, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Read, T. Towards a New Model for Inclusive Education Based on Virtual Social Inclusion and Mobile Openness. World J. Educ. Technol. Curr. Issues 2020, 12, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henard, F.; Roseveare, D. Fostering Quality Teaching in Higher Education: Policies and Practices; An IMHE Guide for Higher Education Institutions; OECD: Paris, France, 2012; pp. 7–11. [Google Scholar]
- Suresh, M.; Vishnu Priya, V.; Gayathri, R. Effect of e-learning on academic performance of undergraduate students. Drug Invent. Today 2018, 10, 1797–1800. [Google Scholar]
- Haque, M.; Rahman, N.A.; Majumder, M.A.; Rahman, N.I.; Haque, S.Z.; Zulkifli, Z.; Lugova, H.; Musa, R.M.; Alattraqchi, A.G. Assessment of academic/non-academic factors and extracurricular activities influencing performance of medical students of faculty of medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia. Adv. Hum. Biol. 2018, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musa, R.M.; Suhaimi, M.Z.; Musa, A.; Abdullah, M.R.; Abdul Majeed, A.P.P.; Maliki, A. Predicting students academic performance from wellness status markers using machine learning techniques. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2020, 13, 2047–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inkster, K. Foam Rolling: 50 Exercises for Massage, Injury Prevention, and Core Strength; Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Gipit, M.A.; Charles, M.R.A.; Musa, R.M.; Kosni, N.A.; Maliki, A.B.H.M. The Effectiveness of Traditional Games Intervention Programme in the Improvement of Form One School-Age Children’s Motor Skills Related Performance Components. Mov. Health Exerc. 2017, 6, 157–169. [Google Scholar]
- Musa, R.M.; Kannan, J.A.P.; Nek, U.K.W.; Rashid, N.W.F.M.; Ali, A.M.; Rashid, N.A.S.A. Appraisal of wellness-lifestyle status among Malaysian undergraduate students: A cross-sectional and gender-based wellness survey. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 10, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
- Gasibat, Q.; Simbak, N.; Aziz, A.A.; Musa, R.M. Effect of the stabilization training programme in the improvement of trunk and hip muscles activations among healthy females subject: An implication for the rehabilitation experts. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 2017, 17, 948–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogdanis, G.C. Effects of physical activity and inactivity on muscle fatigue. Front. Physiol. 2012, 3, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Weston, M.; Taylor, K.L.; Batterham, A.M.; Hopkins, W.G. Effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training (HIT) on fitness in adults: A meta-analysis of controlled and non-controlled trials. Sports Med. 2014, 44, 1005–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ismail, M. Social Sciences & Humanities the Effects of Mixed Exercise (ABOXERCISE) on Cardiovascular Endurance, Muscular Endurance and BMI level in 30-to 40-Year-Old Obese Males. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Hum. 2018, 26, 1519–1527. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez, M. High attrition rates in e-learning: Challenges, predictors, and solutions. eLearning Dev. J. 2003, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Oakes, J.; Espinoza, D.; Darling-Hammond, L.; Gonzales, C.; DePaoli, J.; Kini, T.; Hoachlander, G.; Burns, D.; Griffth, M.; Leung, M. Improving Education the New Mexico Way: An Evidence-Based Approach; Learning Policy Institute: Palo Alto, CA, USA; Washington, DC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Allen, I.E.; Seaman, J. Making the Grade: Online Education in the United States, 2006; Sloan Consortium: Newburyport, MA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Martens, R.; Bastiaens, T.; Kirschner, P.A. New learning design in distance education: The impact on student perception and motivation. Distance Educ. 2007, 28, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coman, C.; Țîru, L.G.; Meseșan-Schmitz, L.; Stanciu, C.; Bularca, M.C. Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, P.J.-H.; Hui, W. Examining the role of learning engagement in technology-mediated learning and its effects on learning effectiveness and satisfaction. Decis. Support Syst. 2012, 53, 782–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazur, J.; Dzielska, A.; Kleszczewska, D.; Oblacińska, A.; Fijałkowska, A. Changes in physical activity of adolescent girls in the context of their perception of the Healthy Me programme. Eur. J. Public Health 2020, 30, 433–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirwan, M.; Duncan, M.J.; Vandelanotte, C.; Mummery, W.K. Using smartphone technology to monitor physical activity in the 10,000 Steps program: A matched case–control trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2012, 14, e1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gender | Count (Percent) | Level of Knowledge at Start of the Course | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Excellent | |||
Male | Frequency (%) | 0(0) | 11(25.6) | 10(23.3) | 9(20.9) | 13(30.2) | 43(32.6) |
Female | Frequency (%) | 4(4.5) | 13(14.6) | 18(20.2) | 22(24.7) | 32(36) | 89(67.4) |
Overall Total | 4(3) | 24(18.2) | 28(21.2) | 31(23.5) | 45(34.1) | 132(100) | |
Level of Knowledge at End of the Course | Total | ||||||
Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Excellent | |||
Male | Frequency (%) | 0(0) | 1(2.3) | 4(9.3) | 13(30.2) | 25(58.1) | 43(32.6) |
Female | Frequency (%) | 0(0) | 1(1.1) | 7(7.9) | 29(32.6) | 52(58.4) | 89(67.4) |
Overall Total | 0(0) | 2(1.5) | 11(8.3) | 42(31.8) | 77(58.3) | 132(100) | |
Gender | Starting, χ2 (4) = 5.562; p = 0.234; ending, χ2 (3) = 0.381; p = 0.944 | ||||||
Level of knowledge, before/after | χ2 (12) = 79.236; p < 0.0001 |
Variable | Median (Muscle Functionality) | Z Statistics | p-Value * | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning of Class | End of Class | |||
Flexibility | 28 (22, 32) | 30 (25, 33) | −7.454 | 0.001 |
Muscle fitness | 38 (29, 47) | 47 (36, 60) | −9.746 | 0.001 |
Gender | Count (Percent) | Clear Learning Objectives | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strongly Disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly Agree | |||
Male | Frequency (%) | 1 (2.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.3) | 13 (30.2) | 28 (65.1) | 43 (32.6) |
Female | Frequency (%) | 1 (1.1) | 0 (0) | 2 (2.2) | 20 (22.5) | 66 (74.2) | 89 (67.4) |
Overall Total | 2 (1.5) | 0 (0) | 3 (2.3) | 33 (25.0) | 94 (71.2) | 132 (100) | |
Good Organisation and Course Content Plan | Total | ||||||
Strongly Disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly Agree | |||
Male | Frequency (%) | 1 (2.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.3) | 10 (23.3) | 31 (72.1) | 43 (32.6) |
Female | Frequency (%) | 1 (1.1) | 0 (0) | 3 (3.4) | 16 (18.0) | 69 (77.5) | 89 (67.4) |
Overall Total | 2 (1.5) | 0 (0) | 4 (3.0) | 26 (19.7) | 100 (75.8) | 132 (100) | |
Appropriate Workload | Total | ||||||
Strongly Disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly Agree | |||
Male | Frequency (%) | 1 (2.3) | 0 (0) | 2 (4.7) | 13 (30.2) | 27 (62.8) | 43 (32.6) |
Female | Frequency (%) | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0) | 5 (5.6) | 18 (20.2) | 65 (73.0) | 89 (67.4) |
Overall Total | 2 (1.5) | 0 (0) | 7 (5.3) | 31 (23.5) | 92 (69.7) | 132 (100) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Eswaramoorthi, V.; Kuan, G.; Abdullah, M.R.; Abdul Majeed, A.P.P.; Suppiah, P.K.; Musa, R.M. Design and Validation of a Virtual Physical Education and Sport Science–Related Course: A Learner’s Engagement Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7636. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137636
Eswaramoorthi V, Kuan G, Abdullah MR, Abdul Majeed APP, Suppiah PK, Musa RM. Design and Validation of a Virtual Physical Education and Sport Science–Related Course: A Learner’s Engagement Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(13):7636. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137636
Chicago/Turabian StyleEswaramoorthi, Vijayamurugan, Garry Kuan, Mohamad Razali Abdullah, Anwar P. P. Abdul Majeed, Pathmanathan K. Suppiah, and Rabiu Muazu Musa. 2022. "Design and Validation of a Virtual Physical Education and Sport Science–Related Course: A Learner’s Engagement Approach" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 13: 7636. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137636
APA StyleEswaramoorthi, V., Kuan, G., Abdullah, M. R., Abdul Majeed, A. P. P., Suppiah, P. K., & Musa, R. M. (2022). Design and Validation of a Virtual Physical Education and Sport Science–Related Course: A Learner’s Engagement Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7636. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137636