Next Article in Journal
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among U.S. Veterans Experiencing Homelessness in Transitional Housing
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding Anthropogenic PM2.5 Concentrations and Their Drivers in China during 1998–2016
Previous Article in Journal
The Short-Term Consequences of COVID-19 on Mental Health: State of the Art from Available Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Air Pollutants in Metropolises of Eastern Coastal China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Seasonal Variation on Spatial and Temporal Distributions of Ozone in Northeast China

1
Heilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Geographical Environment Monitoring and Spatial Information Service in Cold Regions, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China
2
Heilongjiang Province Cold Region Ecological Safety Collaborative and Innovation Center, Harbin 150025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 15862; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315862
Submission received: 31 October 2022 / Revised: 20 November 2022 / Accepted: 24 November 2022 / Published: 29 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Air Pollution and Its Environmental and Health Effects)

Abstract

:
The levels of tropospheric ozone (O3) are closely related to regional meteorological conditions, precursor emissions, and geographical environments, which have a significant negative impact on human health. The concentrations of O3 were relatively low, while the spatial distribution was strongly heterogeneous in Northeast China; however, little is known about how the influencing factors affect the distribution of O3 in Northeast China. Here, the O3 concentration, meteorological observation data, precursors (NO2), and vegetation coverage data from 41 monitoring cities in Northeast China from 2017 to 2020 were collected and analyzed. The spatial–temporal distributions and evolution characteristics of O3 concentrations were investigated using statistical analysis, kriging interpolation, spatial autocorrelation analysis, cold–hot spot analysis, and geographic detectors, and the effects of meteorological factors, NO2, and green land area on O3 concentrations were evaluated seasonally and spatially. The results showed that O3 pollution in Northeast China was generally at a relatively low level and showed a decreasing trend during 2017–2020, with the highest concentrations in the spring and the lowest concentrations in the autumn and winter. May–July had relatively high O3 concentrations, and the over-standard rates were also the highest (>10%). The spatial distribution showed that the O3 concentration was relatively high in the south and low in the northeast across the study area. A globally significant positive correlation was derived from the spatial autocorrelation analysis. The cold–hot spot analysis showed that O3 concentrations exhibited spatial agglomerations of hot spots in the south and cold spots in the north. In Northeast China, the south had hot spots with high O3 pollution, the north had cold spots with excellent O3 levels, and the central region did not exhibit strong spatial agglomerations. A weak significant negative correlation between O3 and NO2 indicated that the emissions of NOx derived from human activities have weak effects on the O3 concentrations, and wind speed and sunshine duration had little effect on spatial differentiation of the O3 concentrations. Spatial variability in O3 concentrations in the spring and autumn was mainly driven by temperature, but in the summer, the influence of temperature was weakened by the relative humidity and precipitation; no factor had strong explanatory power in the winter. The temperature was the only controlling factor in hot spots with high O3 concentrations. In cold spots with low O3 concentrations, the relative humidity and green land area jointly affected the spatial distributions of O3.

1. Introduction

Since the implementation of China’s Action Plan on Air Pollution Prevention and Control (2013), the concentrations of anthropogenic atmospheric pollutants such as SO2, NO2, CO, PM2.5, and PM10 have decreased significantly, illustrating the effectiveness of control measures on particulate pollution [1]. However, ozone (O3) pollution is still increasing [2]. According to the Bulletin of the Ecological Environment, the annual proportions of days with O3 levels exceeding the standard were 5.3%, 7.6%, 4.9%, and 4.4% from 2018 to 2021, respectively, making it the most important air pollutant after PM2.5. High concentrations of O3 seriously threaten the human cardiovascular and respiratory systems, damage the internal structures and ecological functions of plants, and even adversely affect global climate change [3,4,5]. O3 concentrations near the surface are dependent on precursor emissions [6], meteorological factors [7], chemical reactions [8], geographical environment [9], and regional transport [10] and generally show high spatial heterogeneity. Previous studies on the distributions of O3 have mainly focused on areas with high O3 pollution, such as the Bohai Rim, North China Plain, the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, and Central Inner Mongolia [11,12], and it has been concluded that the dominant factors driving O3 pollution also exhibit certain regional differences. For example, the spatial variability in O3 concentrations in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration appeared to be mainly driven by socioeconomic factors such as the economic scale, urbanization, and emission sources [13]. Similarly, the temperature, wind speed, and the proportion of the GDP made up by secondary industry were all identified as important factors for O3 concentrations in North China [14]. However, most of the above studies on O3 concentrations focused on socioeconomic factors in densely populated areas, and relatively few focused on areas that can be regarded as having low levels of human activity. Therefore, more systematic studies on the spatiotemporal variability of O3 concentrations under the influence of natural factors such as climate and surface vegetation should be conducted.
In recent years, O3 pollution in Northeast China has become increasingly prominent, but the O3 concentration in the region varies greatly from north to south, with low values in the north and high values in the Southeastern Bohai Rim area adjacent to the high pollution center in North China [15]. This distribution demonstrates the importance of O3 sources and the urgent need to strengthen treatment efforts. By analyzing the evolution of spatial patterns and influencing factors of O3 concentrations in Northeast China in 2016, Chen et al. [16] found that temperature was the dominant factor determining annual average O3 concentrations. However, the spatial variability in temperature in Northeast China is large, so the annual differences among areas are significant. The factors driving O3 concentrations are found to be different in different regions, and the effect sizes of different factors will vary among seasons. This introduces high levels of complexity that greatly limit our understanding of the contributing mechanisms and our ability to predict O3 concentrations throughout Northeast China. Moreover, Northeast China has the largest natural forest area in China, and plants are known to produce high levels of bio-volatile organic compounds (BVOCs), which can act synergistically with precursors to enhance O3 production [17]. These large natural sources of BVOCs further complicate O3 pollution mechanisms in Northeast China. Therefore, based on the O3 concentration data; meteorological data (temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, sunshine hours, and precipitation); and green land area data in Northeast China from 2017 to 2020, the current study uses the spatial autocorrelation analysis, cold–hot spot analysis, geographical detector, and other spatial analysis methods to clarify the spatial–temporal variation rules of O3 concentrations in Northeast China. The main factors controlling O3 concentrations were comprehensively analyzed, while accounting for seasonal differences and spatial agglomeration patterns in O3 concentrations, to provide a scientific basis for the prevention and control of pollution in low O3 concentration areas.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

In this paper, Northeast China was selected as the study area, including Heilongjiang Province, Jilin Province, and Liaoning Province, as well as Hulunbuir, Chifeng, Tongliao, Hinggan League, and Xilin Gol League of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, with a total area of about 1.52 million km2. The study area is bordered by North China to the south, Russia to the north, Japan across the sea to the east, and the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region to the west. The terrain is mainly plains, hills, and mountains. The main geographical features include the northeast plains and the Greater Khingan Mountains, Lesser Khingan Mountains, and Changbai Mountains. The forest coverage in the study area was 47.2%, significantly higher than the national level (23.0%). This region is an important grain production area for China. The northern part of Northeast China is in a cold temperate zone, while the southern part is in a warm temperate zone. According to the China Meteorological Data Network, the annual temperature difference between the northern and southern portions was as high as 10.8 °C in 2020. In recent years, due to the increasing clean energy capacity in Northeast China, particulate pollutants such as PM2.5 and PM10 have been gradually decreasing, but ozone pollution has continued to increase [17].

2.2. Data Sources

The O3 concentration data, as well as the atmospheric pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, CO, SO2, and NO2) were obtained from 41 state-controlled monitoring stations in Northeast China (Figure 1). The original data were from the national urban air quality real-time publishing platform (https://www.mee.gov.cn/, accessed on 20 March 2021) and covered from 1 January 2017 to 28 February 2021. The O3 concentrations are monitored in real time by the National Environmental Monitoring Station, which uses sodium indigo disulfonate spectrophotometry and ultraviolet photometry. The O3 concentrations were analyzed on monthly and annual scales, and the meteorological determination method was used for the analysis of the seasonal variations. Spring, summer, autumn, and winter were defined as March–May, June–August, September–November, and December–February, respectively. The daily O3 evaluation index adopts the maximum 8-h sliding mean concentration of O3, which refers to the maximum of all the 8-h sliding mean concentrations from 8:00 to 24:00 in a natural day. The 90th percentile of the maximum 8-h moving average concentration of O3 was also measured. The maximum daily 8-h sliding average O3 concentration (O3-8 h) was used as the daily evaluation index, and the 90th percentile of the maximum daily 8-h sliding average O3 concentration (O3-8h-P90) was used as the annual evaluation index.
From 1 January 2017 to 28 February 2021, the cumulative daily ozone data provided by 41 monitoring stations was 69,577 days, and the validity and invalidity of the data were determined by the existence of the data. If data were missing, they were considered invalid; otherwise, the data were considered valid. The valid amount of O3 data was 59,397 d in total, with an effective rate of 99.16%. The evaluation standard was implemented according to the Technical Provisions of the Air Quality Index (AQI) (Trial) (HJ 633-2012), and the O3 concentrations were divided into 6 levels: excellent (0–100 μg·m−3), good (101–160 μg·m−3), lightly polluted (161–215 μg·m−3), moderately polluted (216–265 μg·m−3), heavily polluted (266–800 μg m−3), and severely polluted (>800 μg m−3). The green land area was set according to the China Urban Statistical Yearbook, and the meteorological data (temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, sunshine duration, and precipitation) were collected from China’s daily surface climate dataset (V3.0) released by the China Meteorological Data Network (http://data.cma.cn/site, accessed on 20 March 2021). The data have been rigorously screened in previous applications and shown to be robust.

2.3. Methods

2.3.1. Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis

According to the first law of geography, spatial distributions are geographically interdependent within regions, and the closer the distance, the stronger the correlation—that is, variables exhibit spatial autocorrelation [18,19,20]. Spatial autocorrelation can be used to reveal spatial dependencies and the heterogeneity of observed variables in a study area. In this paper, Moran’s I was used as the autocorrelation index for O3 concentrations in monitored cities in Northeast China. I is a value within [−1, 1], where I > 0 indicates that the O3 concentration has a positive spatial correlation, I < 0 indicates a negative spatial correlation, and I = 0 indicates a random distribution.

2.3.2. Cold–Hot Spot Analysis

Global spatial autocorrelation (Moran’s I) can reflect the overall aggregation or dispersion in a regional space but cannot reflect locally specific conditions. In the current research, the Getis–Ord (Gi*) cold–hot spot analysis was used to assess the O3-8 h-P90 aggregation characteristics in Northeast China in 2017–2020. If Gi* exceeds the 90% confidence level, it indicates that the area and surrounding areas are hot zones that have high O3 concentrations; otherwise, the areas are identified as cold spots with low O3 concentrations. Areas that fail the significance test are said to exhibit no spatial aggregation characteristics and show discrete distributions. The calculation result of Gi* is the Z value, and the higher the Z value, the tighter the clustering of a hot spot area is; conversely, the lower the Z value, the tighter the clustering of a cold spot area [21].

2.3.3. Geographical Detector

A geographical detector is a statistical tool for quantifying the factors influencing the spatial differentiation of geographical objects. This model makes up for the shortcomings of traditional statistical methods by detecting the influences of independent variables on dependent variables using the relationships between the intra-level variance and global variance of each variable, i.e., the spatial differences in the degree of influence of independent variable X on dependent variable Y [12]. The current research considered both seasonal differences and spatial clustering patterns in O3 concentrations. The factor detection tool in the geographical detector was used to identify the driving forces and magnitude of spatial differentiation among O3 concentrations, meteorological factors, and green land area, and the influence directions of the factors were analyzed by a correlation analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Temporal Variation in O3 Concentrations

3.1.1. Annual Variation

The mean annual concentrations of O3-8 h-P90 in Northeast China from 2017 to 2020 were 134 μg·m−3, 127 μg·m−3, 127 μg·m−3, and 125 μg·m−3, respectively (Figure 2), which were lower than the national secondary standard (160 μg·m−3). Compared with 337 cities in China, this region was 12.5% lower than average, making it a low O3 concentration area. On the whole, the O3 concentration decreased by 6.7% during 2017–2020. However, the variance analysis showed that there was no significant change in the O3 concentration during the 4 years (p = 0.265), so the average O3 concentration could represent the overall pollution level in the recent years. Our result was slightly lower than the O3 concentration reported by [22] from 2015 to 2018 (131–138 μg·m−3), which was mainly due to the scope of the study area. Five league cities with low O3 concentrations (annual average of 82 μg·m−3), including Chifeng, Tongliao, Hulunbuir, Hinggan League, and Xilin Gol League, were included in the present study. In terms of O3-8 h in Northeast China (Figure 2), the annual over-standard rates (O3-8 h concentrations greater than secondary standards) were 5.25%, 3.1%, 3.68%, and 3.23% from 2017 to 2020, respectively, with the O3 pollution conditions being mainly categorized as excellent and good. In the past four years, the O3 concentration has exhibited the same trend as the over-standard rate, roughly decreasing each year, suggesting that O3 pollution control has had a notable impact.

3.1.2. Seasonal Variation

Figure 3 shows the distribution of O3-8 h concentrations in the 41 monitored cities in Northeast China from 2017 to 2020 in different seasons. The concentrations ranged within 26–300 μg·m−3 in the spring, 10–338 μg·m−3 in the summer, 5–230 μg·m−3 in the autumn, and 8–152 μg·m−3 in the winter, with the largest variability occurring in the summer and the smallest in the winter. The highest seasonal average concentration of O3-8 h was 103 μg·m−3 in the spring, followed by 101 μg·m−3 in the summer, 68 μg·m−3 in the autumn, and 59 μg·m−3 in the winter. The highest value (338 μg·m−3) occurred in the summer, exceeding the national O3 quality standard IV (266 μg·m−3) and reaching the severe pollution level. Except the winter, pollution in the other seasons was categorized as light and above. The over-standard rate was 8.51% in the summer, 5.24% in the spring, and 1.24% in the autumn, and there was no over-standard phenomenon in the winter. The proportion of clean days exceeded 98% in both the autumn and winter, with moderate and high levels of pollution occurring only in the spring and summer. In general, the seasonal O3-8 h concentrations in Northeast China from 2017 to 2020 were characterized by high concentrations in the spring and summer and low concentrations in the autumn and winter. This was mainly due to the high summer temperatures, strong solar radiation, and strong photochemical reactions between ozone and its precursors, which have a catalytic effect on ozone production [23].

3.1.3. Monthly Variation

From 2017 to 2020, the month-to-month trends in O3-8 h concentrations in Northeast China showed obvious inverted “V” patterns of first increasing and then decreasing during each year (Figure 4). The O3 concentration increased gradually from January to May, with a monthly increase of 0.98 μg·m−3 followed by a slow monthly decrease of 0.955 μg·m−3 from June to December. The highest O3 concentration was 2.3 times the lowest value. The monthly average over-standard rates in the past 4 years demonstrated that the changes of O3 concentrations and over-standard rates in Northeast China have been generally consistent. The O3 over-standard rates from May to July were the highest at 10.6%, 13.4%, and 10.1%, respectively. The over-standard rates from March to April and August to October were all lower than 5%. It is worth noting that O3 pollution did not exceed the standard in January–February and November–December, indicating that O3 generation was slow in late autumn and the winter in Northeast China. This may have been because the temperatures in Northeast China during these periods are extremely low and the daily sunshine is limited, thus inhibiting the generation of O3. O3 is generated by a photochemical reaction with VOCS, NOX, and other precursors under the action of solar radiation, and its reaction speed is positively correlated with temperature. In late autumn, the temperature drops to below 0 °C, and with the temperature decreasing, the photochemical reaction speed slows down accordingly, so the generation of ozone is slow. In addition, precipitation in Northeast China is relatively high in the winter, which can enhance the settling and clearing of atmospheric O3 [16].

3.2. Spatial Variability in O3 Concentrations

3.2.1. Annual Variation

From 2017 to 2020, the spatial distributions of the O3-8 h-P90 concentrations in Northeast China were relatively consistent (Figure 5), with the overall characteristics of high concentrations in the southeast, low concentrations in the northeast, and moderate concentrations in the west. The O3 concentrations were highest in Liaoning Province, followed by Jilin and Heilongjiang Provinces, and lowest in the five cities in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. The northeast region of China is located in the typical monsoon climate area, and the northwest wind prevails in the winter. Compared with the southern region, the demand of coal burning for heating is greater in the northern region. The nitrogen oxides generated in the process of coal burning are conducive to the generation and accumulation of ozone, and ozone and other pollutants are transported to the southern region under the action of the prevailing wind. Therefore, the south of the northeast area is the downwind area that transmits the most serious ozone pollution. In 2017, the highest concentrations of O3 were located in the Southeastern Bohai Rim area and connected with the smaller pollution area in Jilin, Jilin Province, forming the high incidence area of O3 pollution. The O3 concentrations of 11 cities, including Shenyang, Jinzhou, Huludao, Panjin, Yingkou, and Jilin, were higher than the national second-class standard. In 2018, O3 pollution started to be alleviated, and the low-value area gradually expanded. Compared with the O3 concentrations in 2017, the average value of O3 decreased by 10.3% in Liaoning Province, 7% in Jilin Province, and 5% in the five leagues of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region but increased by 2% in Heilongjiang Province. In 2019, the high O3 pollution area extended from Liaoning Province to Liaoyuan, Siping, and Yanbian in Jilin Province, and the average O3 in Liaoning Province and the five cities in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region increased by varying degrees. In 2020, the O3 concentration in Jilin Province, Liaoning Province, and the five cities of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region showed a downward trend, but the O3 concentration in Heilongjiang Province increased from 103 μg·m−3 in 2019 to 107 μg·m−3 in 2020. In general, the high O3 pollution areas in Northeast China were contiguously distributed, and cohesive regional prevention and control efforts need to be strengthened. Furthermore, the O3 concentrations in low-value pollution areas increased in 2020, indicating that the relevant authorities need to increase their efforts to combat O3 pollution in the low-value areas as well.

3.2.2. Seasonal Variation

The spatial distributions of O3-8 h concentrations in Northeast China changed significantly among the seasons (Figure 6), and the variation coefficients in the spring, summer, autumn, and winter were 9.03%, 21.5%, 15.34%, and 6.75%, respectively. In the summer, O3 pollution was the most serious, and the spatial variation was most pronounced, with the highest value being 2.2 times the lowest value. The main reason for the most serious O3 pollution in the summer is the long sunshine time in the summer, the strong solar radiation, and the high temperature accelerates the photochemical reaction of ozone, so that the ozone concentration rises. The O3 concentrations gradually increased from north to south, with the highest concentration in Liaoning Province (123 μg·m−3), followed by Jilin Province (101 μg·m−3) and the five cities of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (102 μg·m−3), and the lowest concentration in Heilongjiang Province (77 μg·m−3). In the autumn, the O3 concentrations decreased by 35% in Heilongjiang Province, 53% in Jilin Province, 58% in Liaoning Province, and 52% in the five cities of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. In the autumn, the spatial differentiation of the O3 concentrations weakened in the low-value areas in the north but still exhibited high spatial variability in the high-value areas in the south. The O3 concentrations in the spring were generally higher than in the autumn, but the spatial distributions were generally similar. The average O3 concentrations in the winter were the lowest, when the spatial variation was also the smallest, in the range of 51–69 μg·m−3. The main reason for the seasonal spatial variability in the O3 concentrations was the large temperature difference between the north and south in the summer and the low average temperature in the winter in Northeast China. This agrees with previous reports of a positive correlation between temperature and O3 concentrations.

3.3. Spatial Aggregation Characteristics of O3 Concentration

A global spatial autocorrelation analysis of the O3-8 h-P90 concentrations in the 41 monitoring stations in Northeast China from 2017 to 2020 was conducted. The results showed that, from 2017 to 2020, the annual Moran’s I index values were all positive (10.8, 10.41, 12.55, and 12.53, respectively), and the Z(I) values were all greater than 2.58. This indicated that the O3-8 h-P90 concentration in Northeast China was significantly positively autocorrelated and exhibited obvious spatial agglomeration characteristics.
The cold–hot spot analysis method was used to further reveal the spatial agglomeration characteristics of O3-8 h-P90 concentrations in Northeast China during the past four years (Figure 7). The results showed that the O3-8 h-P90 concentrations in Northeast China exhibit the spatial agglomeration characteristics of being hot in the south and cold in the north. In 2017, the hot spots were mainly distributed in Liaoning Province; Siping, Liaoyuan, and Tonghua in Jilin Province; and Chifeng and Tongliao in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, reflecting the homogenization of high–high agglomerations due to the high O3 concentrations in these areas. The cold spots were located in Hulunbuir of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and 12 cities in Heilongjiang Province, except Harbin, where the O3 concentrations were low, showing the homogenization of low–low agglomerations. However, the feature-free spots were mainly distributed in the transition regions between cold and hot spots, where the spatial aggregations of the O3 concentrations were relatively scattered with weak correlations. The cold and hot spots in 2017 and 2018 were exactly the same. However, in 2019 and 2020, only the hot spots were the same as the previous two years, while the cold spots were smaller. In conclusion, the hot spots of the O3 concentrations in Northeast China did not change significantly from 2017 to 2020, but there was a trend in which the cold spots transitioned to feature-free spots.

4. Discussion

4.1. Relationships among O3, Meteorological Factors, and Atmospheric Pollutants

The tropospheric O3 concentrations were effected by natural meteorological factors and the release of precursors from human activities [23]. The relationships of the O3 concentrations and all the meteorological factors (temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, sunshine duration, and precipitation), as well ae atmospheric pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, CO, SO2, and NO2) during 2017–2020, were investigated to evaluate the effects of each meteorological factor and atmospheric pollutant on O3 pollution in Northeast China (Figure 8), especially the effects of temperature and O3 precursors.
The results show that O3 has a significant negative correlation with other pollutants such as PM2.5, PM10, CO, SO2, and NO2. The correlation order is PM2.5 > SO2 > NO2 > PM10 > CO. The decrease of other pollutants leads to the increase of O3 concentration. O3 is positively correlated with temperature, wind speed, sunshine duration, and precipitation among the meteorological factors and negatively correlated with the relative humidity, all of which pass the reliability test at the level of 0.01. Temperature is the dominant factor affecting O3 concentration, and the correlation coefficient is 0.66. The higher the temperature, the stronger the photochemical reaction between O3 and its precursors, and the faster the O3 generation, followed by the sunshine duration. The influence of sunshine duration on the O3 concentration is mainly reflected in solar radiation, and studies have shown that strong solar radiation is the key factor leading to O3 rise. The sunshine duration is closely related to solar radiation, so there is a positive correlation between sunshine duration and O3. The weak correlation between wind speed and precipitation and O3 may be due to the fact that the average annual wind speed in Northeast China is 2.6 m/s, and the average annual precipitation is only 11 mm. Low wind speed and precipitation have no significant influence on the change in O3 concentration. The relative humidity has a negative influence on O3, and the correlation is not strong. High humidity scours and clears the O3, resulting in a low O3 concentration.

4.2. Seasonal Effects of Meteorological Factors and Precursor on O3

There were significant spatial differences in the O3 concentrations in Northeast China, which could be generalized as high pollution areas in the south and low-value areas in the north. From the south to the north, the spatial agglomeration characteristics transitioned from hot spots to feature-free areas and then to cold spots. This pattern provided a good spatial gradient for further revealing the dominant factors influencing O3 pollution at different locations. Compared with Huang-Huai and middle-lower reaches of the Yangtze River, which are densely populated and economically developed, temperature plays a larger role in the O3 distribution in Northeast China. The temperature gradient in Northeast China is large, and the seasonal differences are significantly larger than those in other regions. The average temperature in the summer is 20.9 °C higher than that in the winter. The temporal changes in the O3 concentrations reflect the temperature trends, i.e., higher in the spring and lower in the autumn and winter, which provides a valuable research opportunity for clarifying the mechanism by which temperature controls the generation of O3. Therefore, this study used a geographical detector to detect spatial differentiation characteristics and rules. Meteorological factors such as temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, sunshine duration, precipitation, and vegetation coverage were examined. The factor detector was selected to determine which factors were driving the variability in the O3-8 h concentrations in Northeast China from 2017 to 2020 at both the seasonal and regional levels. Meanwhile, in combination with the correlation analyses between each explanatory variable and O3 concentration, the positive and negative effects of the influencing factors were clarified.
In the present research, the O3 concentration data; meteorological data (temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, sunshine hours, and precipitation); and green land area data were investigated to deeply clarify the impacts of meteorological and vegetation factors on the spatial–temporal variability of O3 concentrations in Northeast China from 2017 to 2020. The seasonal analysis of the influencing factors showed (Table 1) that the temperature, relative humidity, and precipitation had significant influences (p < 0.05), but there were obvious seasonal differences in their degrees of effect. However, sunshine duration and wind speed failed the significance test. This indicated that, when the O3 concentration in the region was relatively low, the sunshine duration had no obvious effect on O3 generation and neither did wind diffusion. Temperature had the largest effect on O3, and its explanatory power q values were 0.345, 0.205, and 0.294 in the spring, summer, and autumn, respectively (p < 0.05). The average temperatures in the spring and autumn in Northeast China ranged within 7.4–8.7 °C, and precipitation was relatively low. Within this temperature range, temperature was the main influencing factor controlling O3 generation. However, the explanatory power of temperature decreased in the summer. This was due to strong air convection and high precipitation in the summer, which play important roles in scouring and clearing accumulated O3 [22]. Therefore, the influence of temperature in the summer is weakened by relative humidity and precipitation. It is worth noting that the O3 concentration in the winter was not affected by meteorological factors, with all factors exhibiting weak explanatory powers. This was because the winter in Northeast China is cold and long, the average annual temperature is about −11 °C, and the solar radiation is weak, which means the photochemical reactions of O3 precursors and O3 generation are slowed. The O3 concentrations in the winter were mostly classified as excellent. Based on the above observations, when the monthly mean temperature in Northeast China ranges between −2.2 and 16.5 °C, and the monthly precipitation in the quarter ranges between 5 and 1098 mm, the temperature will play a positive role in promoting O3 generation. When the monthly mean temperature is higher than 22.4 °C, and the monthly precipitation in the quarter ranges between 50 and 2559 mm, the O3 concentration will be positively correlated with the temperature but negatively correlated with precipitation. The wet deposition exhibited some influence on removing O3, while the wind speed and sunshine duration had little influence on the spatial distribution of the O3 concentrations.
The NO2 seasonal geographic detection results showed that all seasons passed the significance test except the summer, and the q values of influence in the spring, autumn, and winter were −0.104, −0.153, and −0.217, respectively, indicating that the increase in ozone concentration was related to the decrease in nitrogen dioxide. When the concentration of O3 was between 58 μg·m−3 and 68 μg·m−3, the influence of NO2 on O3 was the most prominent, accounting for 42%. When the concentration of O3 was higher than 68 μg·m−3 and lower than 100 μg·m−3, the correlation was weak, and the higher the concentration was, the weaker the correlation. In general, the influence of NO2 on the distribution pattern of the O3 concentration in Northeast China was negative, and the mean value of q was −0.108. This result may be caused by the overall low concentration of O3 in Northeast China, compared with other regions of China; the intensity of the human activities in Northeast China is weak, so the precursors released by human activities have little influence on O3.

4.3. Effects of Meteorological Factors, Green Land Area, and Precursor on Different O3 Pollution Levels

All factors influencing cold and hot spots according to the geographical detector are provided in Table 2. The influences of temperature and green land area on the O3 concentration were positive (p < 0.05), while the influence of relative humidity was negative (p ≤ 0.05). Wind speed, sunshine duration, and precipitation failed the significance tests, indicating they had weak or no explanatory power over the spatial distributions of O3. The influence of temperature was consistent with the seasonal geographic survey findings. When the average annual temperature was 4.9–11.9 °C, temperature was the main factor controlling O3 distributions, and the higher the average annual temperature, the stronger the influence of the temperature. When the average annual temperature was lower than 3.3 °C, the effect of temperature was not significant. This may have been because the high temperature and strong solar radiation accelerated the photochemical reactions of VOCs, NOx, and O3 and other precursors, leading to increased O3 concentrations. The relative humidity in Northeast China increased from south to north. In the feature-free spots and cold spots (relative humidity 58–63%), the relative humidity had a significant negative correlation with the O3 concentration. In hot spots, the relative humidity had no significant effect, and the O3 concentration was mainly affected by the temperature. In cold spots, the relative humidity was the main factor influencing the O3 concentrations. Similarly, the green land area had a positive relationship with cold spots and feature-free spots. Vegetation can release a large amount of natural VOCs, which synergistically interact with NOx to promote the generation of O3. This was especially apparent in Changchun, Daqing, and other places with high vegetation coverage, where the green land and temperature jointly dominated the spatial distribution of O3. Li et al. [24] also found that vegetation coverage was closely related to the O3 concentration, and the O3 concentration changes corresponded well with the properties of the underlying surface. The regional NO2 geographical detection results showed that the hot spot and cold spot did not pass the significance test, indicating that there was no significant correlation between NO2 and O3 in the high and low O3 concentration areas, and there was a negative correlation between O3 and NO2 at the level of 0.05 in the featured-point areas. The increase of NO2 will reduce O3. In general, the concentration of O3 in Northeast China is weakly affected by precursors such as NO2, and its variation is mainly affected by meteorological factors such as temperature, relative humidity, and precipitation.
Therefore, in hot spots with high O3 concentrations, temperature was the predominant controlling factor, but other factors made significant contributions. With the decline in the O3 concentration, the effect of temperature gradually weakened, and the influence of the relative humidity and green coverage area showed increasing trends. In cold spots with low O3 concentrations, the spatial distributions of O3 were affected by both the relative humidity and green land coverage area.
The spatial distribution of ozone in Northeast China is the result of both natural and human factors [25,26,27]. Natural factors mainly refer to meteorological factors. High temperatures can promote the generation of ozone. Global climate warming causes frequent abnormal atmospheric warming, and the higher the temperature, the faster the chemical reaction of ozone [28]. We will vigorously develop renewable energy. The reduction in greenhouse gas emissions has lowered the temperatures and, thus, ozone levels across the Earth’s surface [29]. Human factors mainly refer to the increase of VOC emissions under the interference of human activities. The sources of VOCS are very complex, most of which come from the emissions of traffic sources, living sources, and industrial sources. Therefore, the country should improve the VOC monitoring system and increase the control of VOCS. We can learn from the advanced experience of the United States to implement more stringent emission policies and environmental tax incentives for industrial enterprises, such as the installation of energy-saving equipment and enterprises enjoying tax credits, so as to achieve the reduction of the ozone precursor VOC content and then reduce the ozone concentration in a certain space. In conclusion, the national mitigation strategy for the ozone concentration should focus on the source control and the end control. In the end control, a perfect ozone pollution monitoring and control system should be established. In this respect, the PAMS photochemical monitoring network in the United States is of great reference value.
If the ozone increases in the future, the number of people exposed to ozone and suffer health risks will increase, and the mortality rate of our population will increase due to acute lower respiratory tract infections, lung cancer, ischemic heart disease, and stroke, which will directly cause very serious economic losses [30,31]. Ozone pollution will also have an adverse effect on the growth of crops. China is a large grain production country. The increase of the ozone content will lead to the decrease of grain production of wheat and rice, and the food supply will be threatened [32,33]. In the future, air pollution control policies with higher targets should be formulated to further curb the rising trend of ozone, so as to fully guarantee public health and food security.

5. Conclusions

Generally, the O3 concentration of Northeast China were lower than the national secondary standards from 2017 to 2020, which belonged to a low O3 concentration region, suggesting that O3 pollution control has had a notable impact. The spatial distributions of the O3-8 h-P90 concentrations were relatively consistent, with the overall characteristics of high concentrations in the southeast, low concentrations in the northeast, and moderate concentrations in the west. O3 pollution was the most serious and the spatial variation was most pronounced in the summer, with the highest value being 2.2 times the lowest value. The main reason for that was the large temperature difference between the north and south in the summer and the low average temperature in the winter in Northeast China. The O3 concentrations exhibited the spatial agglomeration characteristics of being hot in the south and cold in the north. The feature-free spots were mainly distributed in the transition regions between cold and hot spots, where the spatial aggregations of O3 concentrations were relatively scattered with weak correlations.
The seasonal analysis of influencing factors indicated that the temperature, relative humidity, and precipitation had significant influences, while the sunshine duration and wind speed failed the significance test. The average temperatures in the spring and autumn in Northeast China ranged within 7.4–8.7 °C, and the precipitation was relatively low. Within this temperature range, the temperature was the main influencing factor controlling O3 generation. When the average summer temperature is between 6.3 and 33.1 °C, the ozone concentration increases in the spatial range. When the average winter temperature is between −37.6 °C and 11.1 °C, the spatial distribution of the ozone concentration decreases. A regional analysis of the influence factors showed that the influence of temperature and green space area on the O3 concentration was positive, and the influence of relative humidity on the O3 concentration was negative. The influences of temperature and green land area on the O3 concentration were positive, while the influence of relative humidity was negative. Wind speed, sunshine duration, and precipitation failed the significance tests, indicating they had weak or no explanatory power for the spatial distributions of O3.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S.; methodology, H.J. and C.L.; software, J.C.; validation, J.C. and X.A.; formal analysis, C.L.; resources, X.A.; data curation, J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.; writing—review and editing, J.C. and S.Z.; visualization, H.J.; supervision, L.S.; and funding acquisition, L.S. and S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Key Joint Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and Heilongjiang Province for Regional Development, grant number U20A2082, National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 41401589, and Academic Innovation Project of Harbin Normal University, grant number HSDSSCX2021-24.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and constructive comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, B.; Liu, C.Q.; Zhang, J.; Du, J.; Shi, K. The multifractal evaluation of PM2.5-O3 coordinated control capability in China. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 129, 107877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shi, J.W.; Wang, Z.H.; Zhao, C.Y.; Han, X.Y.; Wang, J.M.; Yang, X.X.; Xie, H.T.; Zhao, P.W.; Ning, P. Characteristics and causes of ozone pollution in 16 cities of Yunnan Plateau. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ge, Y.Z.; Chen, C.Q.; Jiang, Y.P.; Yang, T.S.; Kang, H.Y.; Li, J.Z.; Zhao, X.R.; Zhang, Y.B.; Li, M.Y.; Hou, T.Y.; et al. Characteristics of ozone pollution in Tai’an and topographic effects of Mount Tai. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lu, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.L.; Gao, M.; Li, K.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Yue, X.; Zhang, Y.H. Rapid increases in warm-season surface ozone and resulting health impact in China since 2013. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020, 7, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tang, H.Y.; Liu, G.; Zhu, J.G.; Han, Y.; Kobayashi, K. Seasonal variations in surface ozone as influenced by Asian summer monsoon and biomass burning in agricultural fields of the northern Yangtze River Delta. Atmos. Res. 2013, 122, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, D.N.; Yuan, Z.B.; Wang, M.; Zhao, K.H.; Liu, X.H.; Duan, Y.S.; Fu, Q.Y.; Wang, Q.; Jing, S.G.; Wang, H.L.; et al. Multi-factor reconciliation of discrepancies in ozone-precursor sensitivity retrieved from observation- and emission-based models. Environ. Int. 2022, 158, 106952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Abdul-Wahab, S.A.; Bakheit, C.S.; Al-Alawi, S.M. Principal component and multiple regression analysis in modelling of ground-level ozone and factors affecting its concentrations. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2005, 20, 1263–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, R.L.; Lin, Y.L.; Zou, J.H.; Dan, Y.B.; Cheng, C. Review on atmospheric Ozone pollution in China: Formation, spatiotemporal distribution, precursors and affecting factors. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tilmes, S.; Kinnison, D.E.; Garcia, R.R.; Salawitch, R.; Canty, T.; Lee-Taylor, J.; Madronich, S.; Chance, K. Impact of very short-lived halogens on stratospheric ozone abundance and UV radiation in a geo-engineered atmosphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 10945–10955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, X.S.; Li, J.L.; Zhang, Y.H.; Xie, S.D.; Tang, X.Y. Ozone source attribution during a severe photochemical smog episode in Beijing, China. Sci. China Ser. B 2009, 52, 1270–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, X.Y.; Zhao, W.H.; Zhang, T.Y.; Qiu, Y.; Ma, P.F.; Li, L.J.; Wang, L.L.; Wang, M.; Zheng, D.Y.; Zhao, W.J. Analysis of the characteristics of Ozone pollution in the North China Plain from 2016 to 2020. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, P.F.; Song, H.Q.; Wang, T.H.; Wang, F.; Li, X.Y.; Miao, C.H.; Zhao, H.P. Effects of meteorological conditions and anthropogenic precursors on ground-level ozone concentrations in Chinese cities. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 262, 114366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, X.G.; Shao, T.J.; Zhao, J.B.; Cao, J.J.; Song, Y.Y. Spatial-temporal variation and driving factors of ozone concentration in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2019, 28, 1434–1445, (In Chinses with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  14. Ke, B.Q.; He, C.; Yang, L.; Ye, Z.X.; Yi, J.H.; Tian, Y.; Mu, H.; Tu, P.Y.; Han, C.R.; Hong, S. Spatial and temporal distribution of surface ozone and its driving factors in North China. China Environ. Sci. 2022, 42, 1562–1574, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, W.J.; Parrish, D.D.; Wang, S.W.; Bao, F.X.; Ni, R.J.; Li, X.; Yang, S.D.; Wang, H.L.; Cheng, Y.F.; Su, H. Long-term trend of ozone pollution in China during 2014–2020: Distinct seasonal and spatial characteristics and ozone sensitivity. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2022, 22, 8935–8949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, Z.Q.; Shao, T.J.; Zhao, J.B.; Cao, J.J.; Yue, D.P. Spatial pattern evolution and influencing factors of ozone concentration in Northeast China. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 2020, 40, 3071–3080, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  17. Gao, C.; Xiu, A.J.; Zhang, X.J.; Chen, W.W.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, H.M.; Zhang, S.C. Spatiotemporal characteristics of ozone pollution and policy implications in Northeast China. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2019, 11, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moran, P.A.P. The interpretation of statistical maps. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 1948, 37, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Geary, R.C. The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping. Inc. Stat. 1954, 5, 115–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, L.F.; Xie, D.P.; Yuan, Z.B.; Huang, Z.J.; Wu, H.B.; Han, J.L.; Liu, L.J.; Jia, W.C. Quantification of regional ozone pollution characteristics and its temporal evolution: Insights from identification of the impacts of meteorological conditions and emissions. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gorai, A.K.; Biswal, S.S.; Mitra, G. Effects of meteorology on ground-level ozone (GLO) concentrations and identifying the hot spots having significantly higher GLO concentration in a semi-urban area. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2018, 20, 1461–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wei, P.R.; Shao, T.J.; Huang, X.G.; Zhang, Z.D. Study on the spatial-temporal variation characteristics and driving factors of ozone concentration in Northeast China from 2015 to 2018. J. Ecol. Rural. Environ. 2020, 36, 988–997, (In Chinses with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  23. Zohdirad, H.; Jiang, J.H.; Aksoyoglu, S.; Namin, M.M.; Ashrafi, K.; Prévôt, A.S.H. Investigating sources of surface ozone in central Europe during the hot summer in 2018: High temperatures, but not so high ozone. Atmos. Environ. 2022, 279, 119099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, L.L.; Wang, L.; Liu, X.P.; Wang, K.; Xu, Y.; Li, S.L.; Jiang, J.Q. Temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of ozone in Harbin and the relationship between meteorological elements. China Environ. Sci. 2020, 40, 1991–1999. [Google Scholar]
  25. Baidrulhisham, S.E.; Noor, N.M.; Hassan, Z.; Sandu, A.V.; Vizureanu, P.; Ul-Saufifie, A.Z.; Zainol, M.R.R.M.A.; Kadir, A.A.; Deák, G. Effects of weather and anthropogenic precursors on ground-level Ozone concentrations in malaysian cities. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, L.; Xiao, H.; Zhu, L.Y.; Guo, X.; Wang, W.Y.; Ma, L.; Guo, W.; He, J.Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, M.M.; et al. Characteristics of Ozone pollution and the impacts of related meteorological factors in Shanxi Province, China. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, K.; Jacob, D.J.; Liao, H.; Shen, L.; Zhang, Q.; Bates, K.H. Anthropogenic drivers of 2013–2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Tian, J.Q.; Fang, C.S.; Qiu, J.X.; Wang, J. Analysis of Ozone pollution characteristics and influencing factors in Northeast economic cooperation region, China. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kinose, Y.; Yamaguchi, M.; Matsumura, H.; Izuta, T. Impact assessment of Ozone absorbed through stomata on photosynthetic carbon dioxide uptake by Japanese deciduous forest trees: Implications for Ozone mitigation policies. Forests 2020, 11, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Agathokleous, S.; Saitanis, C.J.; Savvides, C.; Sicard, P.; Agathokleous, E.; Marco, A.D. Spatiotemporal variations of ozone exposure and its risks to vegetation and human health in Cyprus: An analysis across a gradient of altitudes. J. For. Res. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, J.; Pan, X.C.; Guo, X.B.; Li, G.X. Health impact of China’s air pollution prevention and control action plan: An analysis of national air quality monitoring and mortality data. Lancet Planet Health 2018, 2, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Belis, C.A.; Dingenen, R.V.; Klimont, Z.; Dentener, F. Scenario analysis of PM2.5 and ozone impacts on health, crops and climate with TM5-FASST: A case study in the Western Balkans. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 319, 115738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Z.H. Satellite-Observed effects from Ozone pollution and climate change on growing-season vegetation activity over China during 1982–2020. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sites of state-controlled monitoring stations in Northeast China.
Figure 1. Sites of state-controlled monitoring stations in Northeast China.
Ijerph 19 15862 g001
Figure 2. Variations in O3-8 h-P90 and the over-standard rate from 2017 to 2020 in Northeast China.
Figure 2. Variations in O3-8 h-P90 and the over-standard rate from 2017 to 2020 in Northeast China.
Ijerph 19 15862 g002
Figure 3. Seasonal variation in of O3-8 h from 2017 to 2020 in Northeast China. (The middle horizontal line of the boxplot represents the median O3 concentration; the top and bottom of the box are the top quartile and the bottom quartile. The scatter plot to the right of the boxplot represents the distribution of O3 concentration, and the curve represents the trend of O3 concentration).
Figure 3. Seasonal variation in of O3-8 h from 2017 to 2020 in Northeast China. (The middle horizontal line of the boxplot represents the median O3 concentration; the top and bottom of the box are the top quartile and the bottom quartile. The scatter plot to the right of the boxplot represents the distribution of O3 concentration, and the curve represents the trend of O3 concentration).
Ijerph 19 15862 g003
Figure 4. Monthly concentrations and over-standard rates of O3-8 h from 2017 to 2020 in Northeast China.
Figure 4. Monthly concentrations and over-standard rates of O3-8 h from 2017 to 2020 in Northeast China.
Ijerph 19 15862 g004
Figure 5. Annual spatial distributions of O3 concentrations from 2017 to 2020 in Northeast China.
Figure 5. Annual spatial distributions of O3 concentrations from 2017 to 2020 in Northeast China.
Ijerph 19 15862 g005aIjerph 19 15862 g005b
Figure 6. Seasonal spatial distributions of O3 concentrations from 2017 to 2020 in Northeast China.
Figure 6. Seasonal spatial distributions of O3 concentrations from 2017 to 2020 in Northeast China.
Ijerph 19 15862 g006aIjerph 19 15862 g006b
Figure 7. Interannual evolution of the spatial concentrations of O3 from 2017 to 2020 in Northeast China.
Figure 7. Interannual evolution of the spatial concentrations of O3 from 2017 to 2020 in Northeast China.
Ijerph 19 15862 g007aIjerph 19 15862 g007b
Figure 8. Correlation coefficients among meteorological factors and atmospheric pollutants. (T: temperature, RH: relative humidity, WS: wind speed, SD: sunshine duration, and P: precipitation. ** Indicates that the correlation is significant at the level of 0.01, and * indicates that the correlation is significant at the level of 0.05.)
Figure 8. Correlation coefficients among meteorological factors and atmospheric pollutants. (T: temperature, RH: relative humidity, WS: wind speed, SD: sunshine duration, and P: precipitation. ** Indicates that the correlation is significant at the level of 0.01, and * indicates that the correlation is significant at the level of 0.05.)
Ijerph 19 15862 g008
Table 1. Seasonal geographical detection of the driving factors.
Table 1. Seasonal geographical detection of the driving factors.
TemperatureRelative HumidityWind SpeedSunshine DurationPrecipitationNO2 Concentrations
Spring0.345 **−0.0900.0580.004−0.077−0.104 *
Summer0.205 *−0.252 *0.0270.091−0.136 *0.042
Autumn0.294 *0.0730.0360.017−0.042−0.153 *
Winter0.067−0.0820.0430.011−0.015−0.217 **
Note: ** and * indicate passing the significance test with reliabilities of 99% and 95%, respectively.
Table 2. Geographical detection analysis of all influencing factors in the cold and hot spots.
Table 2. Geographical detection analysis of all influencing factors in the cold and hot spots.
TemperatureRelative HumidityWind SpeedSunshine DurationPrecipitationGreen Land AreaNO2 Concentrations
Cold spots 0.063−0.176 *0.1040.002−0.0430.137 *−0.041
Feature-free spots0.258 *−0.126 *0.0060.0380.0450.282 *−0.108 *
Hot spots0.362 **0.0210.020.032−0.0280.06−0.068
Note: ** and * indicate passing the significance test with reliabilities of 99% and 95%, respectively.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, J.; Sun, L.; Jia, H.; Li, C.; Ai, X.; Zang, S. Effects of Seasonal Variation on Spatial and Temporal Distributions of Ozone in Northeast China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 15862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315862

AMA Style

Chen J, Sun L, Jia H, Li C, Ai X, Zang S. Effects of Seasonal Variation on Spatial and Temporal Distributions of Ozone in Northeast China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(23):15862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315862

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Jin, Li Sun, Hongjie Jia, Chunlei Li, Xin Ai, and Shuying Zang. 2022. "Effects of Seasonal Variation on Spatial and Temporal Distributions of Ozone in Northeast China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 23: 15862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315862

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop