Next Article in Journal
The Economic Impact of Climate Change on Wheat and Maize Yields in the North China Plain
Next Article in Special Issue
Keeping the Agenda Current: Evolution of Australian Lived Experience Mental Health Research Priorities
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Changes in Environmental Color Chroma on Heart Rate Variability and Stress by Gender
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mental Health Peer Worker Perspectives on Resources Developed from Lived Experience Research Findings: A Delphi Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 9
10.3390/ijerph19095706
Review Report
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Consumer Perspectives on Anxiety Management in Australian General Practice

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(9), 5706; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095706
by Erin Parker 1,* and Michelle Banfield 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Katherine Boydell
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(9), 5706; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095706
Submission received: 11 March 2022 / Revised: 3 May 2022 / Accepted: 4 May 2022 / Published: 7 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lived Experience within Mental Health and Wellbeing Research)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I found this an interesting and timely report. It was well written and presented. A similar uk report would provide a similar account of service  users experience of anxiety management a preference for psycho;ogicsl support as well as medication.

Author Response

Thank you for your reviews, we appreciate your time in reading our paper.

Reviewer 2 Report

I enjoyed reviewing this paper. It is very well written and the topic is relevant. It is quite long, but straightforward and comprehensive. The discussion section was relevant. 

Author Response

Thank you for your reviews, we appreciate your time in reading our paper.

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for the opportunity to review this very well written manuscript. It addresses a critical issue and has pragmatic implications for the field.

I am unable to comment on the statistical analyses reported in this paper and do hope that other reviewers with requisite expertise can do so.

Suggest authors consider the statement referring to 'themes' emerged' - in the qualitative inquiry field, recent work (Braun and Clarke) trouble this - they even have buttons with "themes do NOT emerge" written on them - consider using "themes were identified" instead throughout the manuscript

The two themes - positive and negative experiences are put forward - this is quite simplistic - suggest that this is more complex than this basic dichotomisation - were there respondents who indicated both experiences, depending on context? Is there something in vivo that could more powerfully address these areas?

Some subsections have the same heading 'qualitative response' - please address this

Suggest coming back to the issue of GP training in the discussion and draw on the extant literature in this space - why, despite several programs/workshops/initiatives to enhance GP knowledge/awareness/capacity to deal with mental health issues, is there relatively lack of uptake? 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop