Next Article in Journal
Association between the Quantity of Nurse–Doctor Interprofessional Collaboration and in-Patient Mortality: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Development of an Oral Health Nursing Tool for Patients with a Psychotic Disorder: A Human-Centred Design with a Feasibility Test
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 21
Issue 4
10.3390/ijerph21040493
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

World Trends in Dental Ergonomics Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

by
Wita Anggraini
1,*,
Dewi Ranggaini
2,
Annisaa Putri Ariyani
1 and
Indrani Sulistyowati
1
1
Anatomy Subsection, Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta 11440, Indonesia
2
Physiology Subsection, Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta 11440, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(4), 493; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21040493
Submission received: 21 February 2024 / Revised: 9 April 2024 / Accepted: 15 April 2024 / Published: 17 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ergonomics in Industrial Manufacturing: Human Factors, Workload Assessment, Health Management, and Reducing Risk in the Workplace)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dental ergonomics provides an overview of dentists’ work efficiency. The objective of this study was to obtain quantitative information and produce a visualization of the network of scientific publications on the topic of ergonomics and dentistry using bibliometric analysis. Data mining was conducted using the Scopus database and Boolean expressions (ergonom* AND dentist*) on 14 April 2023. Data extraction and analysis were performed using Open Refine version 3.5.2., VOSviewer version 1.6.17., VOSviewer thesaurus, Microsoft Excel, and Tableau Professional version 2020.1.2. A total of 682 documents were identified, with the United States having the largest number of documents and citations (89 documents, 1321 citations). Work, Dentistry Today, and the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health were the top three sources. Ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are two of the very prominent keywords, with research topics covering prevalence, causes, factors related to causes, prevention, assessment, rehabilitation, evaluation, and intervention. There was no research on ergonomic interventions that collaborated with human factors and ergonomics (HFE). We conclude that the trending topic of dental ergonomics research topics around the world is centered on MSDs. The future research challenge is to apply HFE science to improve the health, safety, efficiency, and quality of dentists’ work.

1. Introduction

The focus of ergonomics is on humans and their interactions with products, equipment, facilities, procedures, and the environment in which humans live and work every day. Ergonomics seeks to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders through identifying, evaluating, and controlling the risk factors in the physical workplace [1]. The dental profession involves repetitive movements combined with forceful movements, awkward postures, and inadequate recovery time. This profession requires precision and has high visual requirements due to the narrow working area, i.e., the oral cavity. Therefore, dentists are at high risk of developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) [2]. WMSDs are a subcategory of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). The Occupational Safety and Health Association (OSHA) defines musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) as disorders of the skeletal muscles, nerves, tendons, ligaments, joints, cartilage, or vertebral discs, which occur slowly over time due to repeated wear and tear or microtrauma [3,4].
WMSDs are a significant problem for dentists and have been discovered early in their careers, even among dental students. Yusof et al., in their research, found that there were significant differences in posture among clinical students in their third, fourth, and fifth years of study. Body pain and the development of MSDs in fourth-year students were caused by poor posture in the legs, while in fifth-year students, they were caused by poor posture in the forearms. Students tend to work in awkward postures that are dangerous, because they are inexperienced and prioritize their patients. These conditions are exacerbated by high levels of pressure to complete treatments on time [5].
The prevalence of MSDs in dentists throughout the world varies from 10.8% to 97.9% [6]. In their research, Batham and Yasobant found that 92.7% of dentists had experienced MSDs during the last 12 months, and in the last 7 days, 84.7% of dentists had complaints of MSDs [7]. The most common MSDs in dentists are back pain, followed by neck pain, shoulder pain, high tension of the trapezius muscle, tendinitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, pinched nerves, early arthrosis, myopia, and auditive changes [8,9]. Pain in the muscles is an alarm in the body before the risk of paralysis and injury occurs, which has the potential to end a career early [10]. In their systematic review, Bret and Gorce reported that the highest prevalence of MSDs in dentists was in the lower back (>60%), shoulders, and upper extremities (35–55%). The main cause was an awkward posture repeated over a long time [11]. Soo et al. reported that dentists’ susceptibility to MSDs reached 68% to 100% in various parts of the body, especially in the neck (26–92%), shoulders (25–92, 7%), and lower back (29% to 94.6%). The causes and problems of MSDs are multifactorial; key risk factors are female dentists (57.1%), awkward posture (50%), long periods of work (30%), and specialist dentists (42.9%) [12]. To maximize the performance of dentists, human factors and ergonomics (HFE) is a special study area aimed at improving the health, safety, efficiency, and quality of dentists’ work while also having a positive impact on patient safety. HFE interventions in health services are categorized into the following: (1) physical ergonomic interventions, (2) cognitive ergonomic interventions, and (3) organizational ergonomic interventions [13].
Scientific publications on ergonomics related to dentists have been around since the 1960s and have consistently increased from year to year. The research subjects are not only dentists but also dental assistants [14], dental hygienists [15], and dental students [16]. The scope of the research is very broad, including the work environment [17,18] and ergonomic interventions [16,19,20,21,22]. These research articles have contributed to producing dental ergonomic principles, so that dentists always work with an “ergonomic culture” [23], and provide strategies for preventing MSDs [24,25].
Based on this background, a bibliometric analysis was carried out on the topic of ergonomics and dentists. Bibliometric analysis is a statistical tool for mapping the highest and current levels of scientific development and identifying research gaps and trends for various purposes, such as searching for research opportunities and supporting scientific research [26]. In bibliometric analysis, VOSviewer software 1.6.17 (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden, The Netherlands) may be used to create a publication network data map accompanied by data visualization that includes co-authorship, co-occurrence, citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-citation links. The use of this software helps researchers, librarians, and publication database managers to obtain a network map of scientific publications including authors or researchers, organizations, countries, and keywords [27,28,29]. VOSviewer users can import bibliographic databases from Scopus, PubMed, or Web of Science [30]. Bibliometric analysis techniques have developed over time and continuously, to measure the impact of publishing articles within the scientific community. All data are presented in the form of mapping to describe the relationships between nodes in the expanded analysis [31].
The aim of this research was to obtain quantitative information and visual information on world trends in ergonomics research related to dentists or dental ergonomics research in all Scopus-indexed publications up to 2023. The analyses in this research included performance analysis, an analysis of journals and articles, an analysis of collaboration between authors and between countries, and an analysis of the intellectual structure of authorship, which maps publication countries, sources, authors, citation networks, and co-citation networks between authors.

2. Materials and Methods

This research was carried out in two stages. The first stage was an exploratory stage of searching for research topics using several keywords with Boolean expressions in the Scopus database. The purpose of this preliminary research was to find research topics with keywords that could provide the most data information (Table 1). A preliminary research topic search was carried out on 5 April 2022 using Boolean sentences in the Scopus electronic database. To search for phrases in Scopus, double quotes are used (“), wildcards (*), and Boolean operators (OR, AND, NOT). The purpose of double quotes is to tell Scopus that these are “loose phrases”, meaning that the words must be together. The use of wildcards (*) is to represent a number of characters, and Boolean operators are used to expand or narrow search parameters when using databases or search engines. The default search field in Scopus uses TITLE-ABS-KEY because the Scopus database is an abstract indexer only [32,33].
Based on the results of data mining with several topics in our preliminary research, the topics of ergonomics and dentistry were selected, which provided the largest number of documents. During this research, data mining was carried out on the Scopus database using Boolean expressions (ergonom* AND dentist*) on 14 April 2023. The search results were exported into a Comma-Separated Value (CSV) file in Microsoft Excel [34]. Microsoft Excel software was also used to analyze all information from recruited sources. To work on visualization and bibliometric construction, VOSviewer software version 1.6.17 was used, and to clean the data, Thesaurus_text in VOSviewer and Open Refine software version 3.5.2 were used.
In the thesaurus step, keywords that have the same meaning (synonyms/hyponyms) were combined or deleted. The document distribution visualization tool was Tableau Professional software version 2020.1.2 (Salesforce Inc., Singapore). The bibliography analysis attributes in VOSviewer software 1.6.17 include co-authorship, co-occurrence, citation, bibliography coupling, co-citation of authors, organizations, and countries [35]. The bibliometric analysis flow can be seen in Figure 1.

3. Results

3.1. Performance Analysis

3.1.1. Publication Frequency by Year

There were 682 research publications on ergonomics and dentistry in English-language journals from 1965 to 2023 in the Scopus database. Figure 2 shows the decrease in the number of publications, covering the years 1979 (1 publication), 1985 (2 publications), 1992 (2 publications), 1993 (2 publications), 1994 (2 publications), 1995 (3 publications), and 1997 (3 publications). Since 2020, publications on dental ergonomics have increased sharply, and they reached a peak in 2021 of 43 publications.

3.1.2. Contribution of Countries to the Field of Dental Ergonomics

A bibliometric coupling analysis was used to evaluate the number of articles published based on the authors’ country of origin (Figure 3). There were 90 countries with at least one article and zero citations. The United States occupied the highest position for ergonomic dentistry publications with 89 articles. The ranking of countries based on the number of articles can be seen in Table 2.

3.1.3. Number of Article Citations by Country

Citation analysis was carried out on country analysis units with a maximum limit of 25 countries in one article, a minimum of one article, and one citation per country (Table 3). The results of this analysis were that out of 90 countries, 69 met these limits. Of the 20 countries with the highest citation weight, the United States was again in first place with 1321 citations for its 89 articles. The exciting thing was that Greece, with just three documents, obtained 287 citations and was ranked sixth.

3.2. Analysis of the Source

3.2.1. Source Analysis Based on the Number of Documents

Source analysis was performed using VOSviewer 1.6.17 with bibliographic coupling. This was based on the number of documents or articles and carried out on the sources unit, with a threshold of each journal having at least one article and zero citations. The aim of providing zero citations is that all sources can be presented through this application (Figure 4). The results showed that 323 Scopus-indexed sources published the 682 articles obtained via data mining, and the most extensive collection of connected sources consisted of 174 articles. In Table 4, it can be seen that Work was the top source, with 19 articles, followed by Dentistry Today (18 articles), the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (14 articles), and the Journal of The American Dental Association (12 articles).

3.2.2. Citation Analysis of Sources

This citation analysis used VOSviewer in the sources unit, with a minimum threshold of having one document and zero citations. The aim of providing zero citations is that all sources can be presented through this application (Figure 5). As a result of taking this approach, 323 sources indexed by Scopus were recruited, and the largest collection of connected sources consisted of 162 sources. Table 5 shows the results of an analysis of sources based on citations, where the Journal of The American Dental Association is the top source with a citation weight of 460, followed by BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (421 citations), Work (338 citations), and Applied Ergonomics (262 citations).

3.3. Analysis of the Article

Our analysis of articles or documents aimed to discover which articles have had the greatest influence on research trends in relation to the topics ‘ergonomics’ and ‘dentists’ or, in other words, research trends in the field of dental ergonomics. For the analysis, VOSviewer was used with citation analysis as the type and analysis documents as the unit. The lower citation threshold was zero, which we used to obtain all article data in this research. VOSviewer displayed 682 articles and their information, including the authors’ names, titles, source information (source name, volume, issue, page), and year of publication.
The article ‘Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in dentists’ published in the journal BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders in 2004 occupied the top citation position. Alexopoulos E.C., Charizani F., and Stathi I.C. wrote this article (Figure 6). The significant citation weight for the article shows the authors’ enormous contribution to the development of dental ergonomics. In Table 6, the 15 most frequently cited articles are shown.

3.4. Analysis of Co-Authorship

3.4.1. Co-Authorship between Authors

Co-authorship analysis examines interactions between authors in any scientific field. Co-authorship is a formal arena for collaboration between writers and experts and can even occur across and between scientific fields [36]. Co-authorship analyses in the author analysis unit from 1733 authors identified 42 with a minimum of four articles [37]. Next, an analysis was carried out using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). In Figure 7, based on the network visualization, three clusters have an extensive network, namely, Clusters 1, 2, and 3. The exciting thing is that the authors from Cluster 1 and Cluster 2, apart from writing together with authors in their cluster, are also shown to collaborate between the clusters.
The joint writing collaboration between Clusters 1 and 3 shows collaboration in scientific fields and institutions. From Clusters 1 and 3, eight authors were found from Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, the Institute of Occupational Medicine, Goethe-University (Germany), namely, Groneberg D.A., Ohlendorf D., Holzgreve F., Wanke E.M., Fraeulin L. Maurer-Grubinger C., Hauck I., and Nowak J. In addition, from Cluster 1, several different author affiliations were found including one author from the Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg, Department of Orthodontics, University Mainz (Germany), namely, Erbe C.; one author from the Principles of Prevention and Rehabilitation Department (GPR), Institute for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services (Germany), namely, Nienhaus A.; and one author from the Department of Dental Radiology, Institute of Dentistry, Goethe-University (Germany), namely, Betz W. In Cluster 3, two authors were found from the Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (IFA)—German Social Accident Insurance (DGUV), Germany, namely, Ditchen D. and Hermanns I.
Joint authorship in Cluster 2 also demonstrates the degree of collaboration between scientific fields and institutions based on author affiliation. From Cluster 2, one author was found from the Mechatronics Department, Polytechnic University (Romania), namely, Argesanu V.; one author from the Ergonomics Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy (Romania), namely, Anghel M.D.; one author from the Department of Mechanical Machinery, Equipment, and Transport, Polytechnic University of Timisoara (Romania); and two authors from the Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy (Romania), namely, Stratul S. and Rusu D.

3.4.2. Co-Authorship between Countries

Co-authorship analysis was carried out on country analysis units with a maximum limit of 25 countries in one article and a minimum of one article per country, with a zero-citation limit. We found that 90 countries met these limits, and the most extensive set comprised 35 connected countries (Figure 8). In Table 7, the ten countries with the top co-authorship are presented.

3.5. Analysis of the Intellectual Structure

Our intellectual structure analysis aimed to determine which authors, articles, or sources have had the most significant influences on ergonomic dentistry research trends [38].

3.5.1. Analysis of the Authors’ Keywords

The aim of analyzing the authors’ keywords is to find the correlation between keywords and the articles’ topics, in this case, so that readers will find it easy to search for various dimensions of research on the themes of ‘ergonomics’ and ‘dentistry’. The analysis was performed using the VOSviewer application, namely, a co-occurrence analysis of the authors’ keywords with a minimum threshold of five keyword occurrences. There were 758 keywords detected, and 34 met the threshold specified above.
Figure 9 shows an overlay visualization of author keywords in six clusters with a total link of 482 and a total link strength of 1644. ‘Ergonomics’ in Cluster 2 is the keyword most frequently used by the author, with 147 co-occurrences linked to 33 other words and a total link strength of 278. The keyword in second place is ‘musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)’, found in Cluster 2 with 124 co-occurrences, links with 32 other authors’ keywords, and a total link strength of 274. The remainder of the ten most used keywords by the authors are ‘dentists’ (88 co-occurrences with 31 links and a total link strength of 177), ‘dentistry’ (65 co-occurrences with 25 links and a total link strength of 113), ‘dental students’ (35 co-occurrences with 23 links and a total link strength of 78), ‘posture’ (28 co-occurrences with 20 links and a total link strength of 69), ‘risk factors’ (19 co-occurrences with 19 links and a total link strength of 54), ‘dental ergonomics’ (16 co-occurrences with 14 links and a total link strength of 22), ‘occupational hazards’ (16 co-occurrences with 19 links and a total link strength of 42), and ‘prevalence’ (16 co-occurrences with 15 links and a total link strength of 37).
Table 8 lists the authors’ keywords based on research subjects, research methods, occupational health and musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomics, and knowledge and education. The purpose of the grouping is to determine world research trends in the field of dental ergonomics [38].

3.5.2. Analysis of the Co-Citation Network of Cited Authors

Co-citation represents two articles that are cited together by at least one article published later. In other words, if two articles are cited together by at least one article, then those two articles are called co-citations. The number of articles that cite the two articles mentioned together is called the frequency or strength of the co-citation [40]. These initial two articles have high co-citation power if more and more articles are published that cite these two articles. Co-citation patterns will change over time. Bibliographic coupling existed earlier than co-citation, and co-citation analysis is considered more recent in reflecting domain structure [41].
In this research, analysis of the co-citation network of authors cited using the VOSviewer application covered 14,317 authors. Setting the threshold of the minimum number of citations for an author as 20 citations, 164 authors were identified. For each of the 164 authors, the VOSviewer application calculated the total strength of co-citation relationships with other authors. Table 9 presents the 15 authors with the greatest co-citations and total link strengths.

4. Discussion

The Scopus database was used as the source of bibliographic data in this research because it has wide coverage, has good data quality and accuracy, provides various bibliometric analysis features, and is a data source that is verified and academically recognized [42]. Falagas et al. compared the strengths and weaknesses of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. PubMed and Google Scholar are free; while PubMed is optimal for biomedical research, Google Scholar’s accuracy is inconsistent. Scopus, meanwhile, has 20% greater citation analysis coverage compared to Web of Science [43]. Sing et al. compared three Web of Science databases, Scopus, and Dimensions. It was reported that almost all journals on the Web of Science can be found in Scopus and Dimensions. Meanwhile, Scopus indexes 66.07% more unique journals compared to Web of Science. Web of Science and Scopus coverage tends to be in the areas of life sciences, physical sciences, and technology, while Dimensions covers more social sciences and arts and humanities [44].
The results of the bibliometric analysis showed that up to April 2023, 682 articles about dentists and dental ergonomics indexed by Scopus could be identified. The number of articles per year varied greatly, where the most prominent decline in articles was in 1979, when only one article was published. More recently, articles on dental ergonomics have increased sharply, with 36 in 2020, 43 in 2021, and 40 by the end of 2022. In 2023, as of April, there were 10 articles.
This sharp increase stems from various studies providing scientific evidence of the high prevalence of MSDs in dentists and noting that these disorders have been found since the beginning of individual-focused dental studies [45,46,47]. These disorders are caused by awkward body postures, unergonomic instruments, poor environmental and system planning, and inadequate work practices. On the other hand, there is still little scientific evidence on the effectiveness of ergonomic educational interventions for improving body posture following induction as a dental student. This raises research questions as to why the prevalence of MSDs in dentists is so high and why ergonomic education interventions aimed at implementing healthy work postures have not had a significant impact [48].
The application of dental ergonomics is important because when working, dentists repeatedly assume sitting, standing, and static positions. Static postures are often used by dentists, such as bending the body forward, bending the neck forward, tilting towards the patient’s mouth, rotating the spine, and abducting the hands for a long time [49]. Static positions cause excessive contractions in several tissues, increasing muscle tension and thereby causing pain in the musculoskeletal system and peripheral nervous system [50]. In addition, the work involves high visual demands, which result in postural adaptations. In their work, dentists often assume a kyphotic posture, bending and turning the head to adjust their field of vision, with lumbar rotation and flexion. Therefore, the prevalence of MSDs in dentists is higher compared to that in other professions [51].
Other risk factors for MSDs include static and awkward neck and shoulder postures, repetitive movements with force in the hands and arms, poor lighting, the patient position not being appropriate to the dentist’s position, individual characteristics (physical condition, height, weight, general health, gender, age), and stress [52]. MSDs reduce an individual’s range of motion, grip strength, normal sensation, and even coordination of the musculoskeletal system [53]. MSDs in dentists begin with initial symptoms including pain, swelling, tenderness, numbness, and loss of strength [54]. In research in Saudi Arabia, neck and back pain were the main problems for dentists, which could start to be corrected in the process of dental education. So, it is important for dental schools to improve dental ergonomics training for their students [55].
The main goal of dental ergonomics is to reduce the risk of MSDs and to minimize the amount of physical and mental stress so that the quality of dentists’ work can be improved [56]. In addition, in the development of dental ergonomics research, the subjects are not only dentists and dental students but should also extend to dental hygienists [57], dental assistants [58], and dental technicians [59]. The progress of dental ergonomics cannot be separated from its history, where initially dentists worked in a standing position; however, since the 1960s, the four-handed dentistry system has been developed where dentists work in a sitting position [60]. Four-handed dentistry is a dental ergonomic effort to minimize unwanted movements and speed up dental treatment procedures [61].
Lietz et al., in their systematic review, considered various studies of ergonomic interventions to prevent MSDs in dental professionals. Of the 11 studies, 5 studies used ergonomic interventions in the form of using magnifying glasses or prismatic glasses; 2 studies used ergonomic dental chairs; 1 study used ergonomic dental instruments; and 3 studies provided ergonomic interventions in the form of ergonomic training. The results of all the included studies showed the important role of ergonomic interventions that can provide an improved work posture, increase work performance, and reduce the severity of MSDs in dental professionals [62].
Our assessment of the development of world trends in the field of dental ergonomics showed that the United States is ranked highest with 89 articles, followed by India (66 articles), Brazil (29 articles), Germany (25 articles), Saudi Arabia (22 articles), Sweden (22 articles), and the United Kingdom (22 articles). The United States is the country with the most articles written across countries and is the country with the highest number of citations. Nonetheless, the analysis of the most cited countries showed that not all countries with more articles have high citations. For instance, Greece is in the sixth position among the top 10 countries with the highest citations, with 287 citations obtained from its three articles, as can be seen in Table 3. Based on network visualization, five countries have cited articles from Greece, namely, Sweden (link strength: 10), Germany (link strength: 9), the United States (link strength: 7), Iran (link strength: 6), and India (link strength: 5), in order of link strength level.
The Journal of The American Dental Association (JADA) is the journal with the highest number of citations, and the next is BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, receiving 460 and 421 citations, respectively. JADA is the leading open-access journal in the United States, which has been around since 1913 and has a Q2 ranking with an h-index of 128, with its subject areas specifically in dentistry and medicine. Since 2000, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders has been an open-access journal, ranked Q2 with an h-index of 112 subject areas including orthopedics, sports medicine, and rheumatology [63]. In third place is Work, with a total of 338 citations. Work has been in existence since 1990 with subject areas covering prevention, assessment, and rehabilitation. It is an interdisciplinary journal ranked Q2 with an h-index of 58. In the fourth place is Applied Ergonomics which has 262 citations, meanwhile, with a Q1 ranking and an h-index of 119 indicated that this open-access journal is aimed explicitly at ergonomists and professionals who apply human factors in designing, planning, and managing technical and social systems. This bibliometric analysis showed that journal age, open-access status, topic, quality, and impact factors were essential in determining the number of document citations [64].
“The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in dentists” was the most frequently cited article and reached the top ranking with 274 citations. This was written by Alexopoulos E.C. in 2004, from the Department of Public Health, Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Greece and the Occupational Health Department, Hellenic Shipyards SA, Athens, Greece. The contents of this article are the results of a survey of 430 dentists in Thessaloniki, Greece, using the Nordic questionnaire to determine the occurrence of MSD complaints in the last 12 months, chronic MSD complaints for at least one month, MSD complaints that caused an inability to work, and whether the respondents sought medical treatment. The survey results showed that 62% of dentists experienced at least one MSD complaint, 30% of dentists experienced chronic MSD complaints, 16% stated they had been absent from work, and 32% of dentists sought medical treatment. From these results, it was concluded that dentists are at risk of experiencing MSDs related to the physical load of their work [65]. Ranked second was an article entitled ”Preventing musculoskeletal disorders in clinical dentistry: Strategies to address the mechanisms leading to musculoskeletal disorders” written by Valachi B., a physiotherapist who is one of the founders of Posturedontics, Portland, Oregon. In this article, strategies for preventing the development of MSDs in dentistry are presented, which aim to shape body posture and work ergonomically [66]. The third most cited article is “Reports of the body in dental student population” by Rising D.W., from the Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco. The research was conducted on 271 dental students in their fourth year, and the conclusion was that 70 percent of students had experienced MSD complaints since their third year as dental students [67].
In the author visualization of keywords up to 2023, the keyword “Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE)” was not found, even though HFE has progressed very rapidly recently. HFE is a science that studies interactions among humans, tasks, and elements of work systems, with the aim of making humans better integrated in a system via adaptations to the environment for the individual. Dentists and other dental health professionals will function better in a more conducive environment. HFE interventions have the potential to improve the performance, health, and welfare of workers, including (1) physical ergonomics interventions (anthropometrics, anatomy, physiology, biomechanics); (2) organizational ergonomics intervention (organizational structure, policies, procedures); and (3) cognitive ergonomic interventions relating to mental processes (memory, reasoning, perception, motor reactions) [68,69]. The research into the application of HFE in the dental education system and dental practice is a future challenge for the world.
This bibliometric analysis research allowed us to produce various quantitative descriptive images of country citations, journals, articles, authors, and author keywords on the theme of ergonomics and dentistry. However, there are several limitations in bibliometric analysis. One is that open access to scientometric data is required. Access to data with sufficient accuracy is a fundamental limitation of bibliometric analysis. The important information required includes metadata, author data, affiliations, and citations. Another limitation is the possibility that the downloaded data are incomplete or duplicate data. The main obstacle in bibliometric analysis is the complexity and diversity of bibliographic data, meaning researchers need to be careful in understanding the various dimensions of the data. The number of citations is directly proportional to time, meaning that older papers tend to receive more citations than new papers.

5. Conclusions

Dental ergonomics research has developed rapidly to the stage where the world’s trending research topic is MSDs in dentists. This topic includes the prevalence of MSDs, along with their causes, factors related to causes, prevention, assessment, rehabilitation, evaluation, and ergonomic intervention. There has not yet been any research on ergonomic interventions that collaborate with human factors and ergonomics (HFE). The future research challenge is to apply HFE science to improve the health, safety, efficiency, and quality of dentists’ work.

Author Contributions

W.A. conceptualized and designed the research, searched the literature, collected data, carried out bibliometric analysis and interpretation, and wrote and edited the manuscript for publication. D.R. searched the literature, collected data, carried out bibliometric analysis and interpretation, and wrote the manuscript. A.P.A. searched the literature, collected data, carried out bibliometric analysis and interpretation, and wrote the manuscript. I.S. searched the literature, collected data, carried out bibliometric analysis and interpretation, and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Data Availability Statement

Research data can be obtained via the corresponding author’s email.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Astri Rinanti, Director of the Universitas Trisakti’s Research and Community Service Institute for her excellent support and discussion during the research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ansari, K.M.N.; Khan, N.B.N.; Omar, N.F.B.M.; El-Wakeel, H.A.; Rahaman, M.S. Assessment of literature growth in Anthropometric measurement research: A bibliometric analyses of Scopus indexed publications. Libr. Philos. Pract. 2021, 1, 1–26. Available online: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5901 (accessed on 11 February 2022).
  2. Abdolalizadeh, M.; Jahanimoghadam, F. Musculoskeletal Disorders in Dental Practitioners and Ergonomic Strategies. Anat. Sci. J. 2015, 12, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  3. Stack, T. The Basics of Ergonomics. In Occupational Ergonomics: A Practical Approach, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 5–19. [Google Scholar]
  4. Muralidharan, D.; Fareed, N.; Shanthi, M. Musculoskeletal Disorders among Dental Practitioners: Does It Affect Practice? Epidemiol. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 716897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yusof, E.M.; Razli, M.A.H.; Nasir, S.A.I.M. Assessment of the Working Posture among Dental Students to Prevent Musculoskeletal Disorders. J. Dent. Indones. 2021, 28, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ohlendorf, D.; Naser, A.; Haas, Y.; Haenel, J.; Fraeulin, L.; Holzgreve, F. Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders among Dentists and Dental Students in Germany. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Batham, C.; Yasobant, S. A risk assessment study on work-related musculoskeletal disorders among dentists in Bhopal, India. Indian. J. Dent. Res. 2016, 27, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yadav, N.; Gupta, H.L.; Kumar, P.; Sethi, S.; Chandra, A. Ergonomics: The X-factor for wellness in dentistry. Int. J. Appl. Dent. Sci. 2015, 1, 128–132. Available online: https://www.oraljournal.com/vol1issue4/1-4-6.1.html (accessed on 11 February 2022).
  9. Aljanakh, M.; Shaikh, S.; Siddiqui, A.A.; Al-Mansour, M.; Hassan, S.S. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among dentists in the Hail Region of Saudi Arabia. Ann. Saudi Med. 2015, 35, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ivona, K.; Zlatko, G.; Cena, D.; Erol, Š.; Mihajlo, P.; Foteva, K. Ergonomics at Dentistry. Medicine 2014, 4, 83–86. [Google Scholar]
  11. Jacquier-Bret, J.; Gorce, P. Prevalence of Body Area Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2023, 20, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sooa, S.Y.; Anga, W.S.; Chonga, C.H.; Tewa, I.M.; Yahyab, N.A. Occupational ergonomics and related musculoskeletal disorders among dentists: A systematic review. Work 2023, 74, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mao, X.; Jia, P.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, P.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, M. An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0129948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Aljanakh, M. Musculoskeletal disorders among dental assistants: A cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2024, 25, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Partido, B.B.; Henderson, R. Reducing the Risks for Musculoskeletal Disorders Utilizing Self-Assessment and Photography among Dentists and Dental Hygienists. J. Dent. Hyg. JDH 2021, 95, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. De Bruyne, M.A.A.; Van Renterghem, B.; Baird, A.; Palmans, T.; Danneels, L.; Dolphens, M. Influence of Different Stool Types on Muscle Activity and Lumbar Posture among Dentists during A Simulated Dental Screening Task. Appl. Ergon. 2016, 56, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dehghan, N.; Aghilinejad, M.; Nassiri-Kashani, M.H.; Amiri, Z.; Talebi, A. The Effect of a Multifaceted Ergonomic Intervention Program on Reducing Musculoskeletal Disorders in Dentists. Med. J. Islam. Repub. Iran 2016, 30, 472. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Blanc, D.; Farre, P.; Hamel, O. Variability of Musculoskeletal Strain on Dentists: An Electromyographic and Goniometric Study. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2014, 20, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rempel, D.; Lee, D.L.; Dawson, K.; Loomer, P. The effects of periodontal curette handle weight and diameter on arm pain: A four-month randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2012, 143, 1105–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Aghilinejad, M.; Kabir-Mokamelkhah, E.; Talebi, A.; Soleimani, R.; Dehghan, N. The Effect of Magnification Lenses on Reducing Musculoskeletal Discomfort among Dentists. Med. J. Islam. Repub. Iran 2016, 30, 473. [Google Scholar]
  21. Deolia, S.; Rizhana, A.; George, J.; Ingle, H.; Bonde, R. Effects of Yoga as A Therapy for Physical and Psychological Hazards in Dentists in Wardha Region. Yoga Mimamsa 2017, 49, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cosoroaba, M.R.; Cirin, L.; Anghel, M.D.; Talpos-Niculescu, C.I.; Argesanu, V.; Farkas, A.Z.; Negrutiu, M.L. The Use of Thermal Imaging in Evaluating Musculoskeletal Disorders in Dentists. J. Med. Life 2019, 12, 247–252. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kapitán, M.; Hodačová, L.; Čermáková, E.; Machač, S.; Schmidt, J.; Pilbauerová, N. The development of musculoskeletal disorders during undergraduate dentistry studies—A long-term prospective study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Srinivasan, M.R.; Priyanka, B.; Poorni, S. Ergonomics and its Impact on Musculoskeletal Disorder among Dental Surgeons: A Literature Review. J. Oper. Dent. Endod. 2020, 5, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rajvanshi, H.; Anshul, K.; Mali, M.; Sarin, S.; Zaidi, I.; Kumar, V.R. Ergonomics in Dentistry: An Once of Prevention is Better than Pounds of Cure: A Review. Int. J. Sci. Study 2015, 3, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  26. De Oliveira, O.J.; da Silva, F.F.; Juliani, F.; Barbosa, L.C.F.M.; Nunhes, T.V. Bibliometric Method for Mapping the State-of-the-Art and Identifying Research Gaps and Trends in Literature: An Essential Instrument to Support the Development of Scientific Projects. In Scientometrics Recent Advances; Kunosic, S., Zerem, E., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. López-Robles, J.R.; Guallar, J.; Otegi-Olaso, J.R.; Gamboa-Rosales, N.K. Bibliometric and thematic analysis (2006–2017). Prof. Inf. 2019, 28, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Linnenluecke, M.K.; Marrone, M.; Singh, A.K. Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Aust. J. Manag. 2020, 45, 175–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Manual for VOSviewer, version 1.6.10; Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 1–52. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.10.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2022).
  30. Sweileh, W.M.; Al-Jabi, S.W.; AbuTaha, A.S.; Zyoud, S.H.; Anayah, F.M.A.; Sawalha, A.F. Bibliometric analysis of worldwide scientific literature in mobile-health: 2006–2016. BMC Med. Inform Decis. Mak. 2017, 17, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ding, X. Knowledge mapping of platform research: A visual analysis using VOSviewer. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2019), Krasnodar, Russia, 11–12 October 2019; Atlantis Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 110, pp. 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Scopus Search Guide. Elsevier. Available online: https://schema.elsevier.com/dtds/document/bkapi/search/SCOPUSSearchTips.htm (accessed on 5 April 2022).
  33. Beatty, S. 6 Simple Search Tips: Lessons Learned from the Scopus Webinar. 2022. Available online: https://blog.scopus.com/posts/6-simple-search-tips-lessons-learned-from-the-scopus-webinar (accessed on 5 April 2022).
  34. Ahmi, A. Bibliometric Analysis Flowchart. 2020. Available online: https://aidi-ahmi.com/index.php/bibliometric-analysis-flowchart (accessed on 27 March 2022).
  35. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Manual for VOSviewer, version 1.6.17; Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 1–53. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.17.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2021).
  36. Ullah, M.; Shahid, A.; Roman, M.; Assam, M.; Fayaz, M.; Ghadi, Y.; Aljuaid, H. Analyzing Interdisciplinary Research Using Co-Authorship Networks. Complexity 2022, 2022, 2524491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liman, P.B.; Anastasya, K.S.; Salma, N.M.; Yenny, Y.; Faradilla, M.A. Research Trends in Advanced Glycation End Products and Obesity: Bibliometric Analysis. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khare, A.; Jain, R. Mapping the conceptual and intellectual structure of the consumer vulnerability field: A bibliometric analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 150, 567–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ivanitskaya, L.V.; Bjork, A.E.; Taylor, M.R. Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Catholic Health Care Research: 1973–2019. J. Relig. Health 2021, 60, 3759–3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Small, H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1973, 24, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, Y.; Choo, W.C.; Abdul Aziz, Y.; Yee, C.L.; Ho, J.S. Go Wild for a While? A Bibliometric Analysis of Two Themes in Tourism Demand Forecasting from 1980 to 2021: Current Status and Development. Data 2022, 7, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Burnham, J.F. Scopus database: A review. Biomed. Digit. Libr. 2006, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Falagas, M.E.; Pitsouni, E.I.; Malietzis, G.A.; Pappas, G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Singh, V.K.; Singh, P.; Karmakar, M.; Leta, J.; Mayr, P. The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics 2021, 126, 5113–5142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hashim, R.; Salah, A.; Mayahi, F.; Haidary, S. Prevalence of postural musculoskeletal symptoms among dental students in United Arab Emirates. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2021, 22, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. AlSahiem, J.; Alghamdi, S.; AlQahtani, R.; Bin-Jardan, L.; AlMadani, D.; Farooqi, F.A.; Gaffar, B. Musculoskeletal disorders among dental students: A survey from Saudi Arabia. BMC Oral Health 2023, 23, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Almeida, M.B.; Póvoa, R.; Tavares, D.; Alves, P.M.; Oliveira, R. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among dental students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon 2023, 9, e19956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. De Santana Sampaio Castilho, A.V.; Michel Crosato, E.; de Carvalho Sales-Peres, S.H.; Foratori Junior, G.A.; de Freitas Aznar, A.R.; Buchaim, R.L. Effectiveness of Ergonomic Training to Decrease Awkward Postures during Dental Scaling Procedures: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shaik, A. Dental ergonomics: Basic steps to enhance work efficiency. Arch. Med. Health Sci. 2015, 3, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Baheti, M.J.; Toshniwal, N.G. Ergonomics: A pain free dentistry for professionals. Orthodontics 2014, 7, 54–61. [Google Scholar]
  51. Garbin, A.J.Í.; Garbin, C.A.S.; Arcieri, R.M.; Rovida, T.A.S.; Freire, A.C.d.G.F. Musculoskeletal pain and ergonomic aspects of dentistry. Rev. Dor. 2015, 16, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gupta, A.; Ankola, A.V.; Hebbal, M. Dental Ergonomics to Combat Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Review. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2015, 19, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gupta, A.; Bhat, M.; Mohammed, T.; Bansal, N.; Gupta, G. Ergonomics in dentistry. Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2014, 7, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Longridge, N.N.; Panju, R.; Fox, K. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional, Pilot Study from a UK University Teaching Hospital. J. Musculoskelet. Disord. Treat. 2020, 6, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sulimany, A.M. Cervical and Lumbar Pain among Dental Interns in Saudi Arabia: A National Cross-sectional Study. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2021, 22, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Das, H.; Motghare, V.; Singh, M. Ergonomics in Dentistry: Narrative Review. Int. J. Appl. Dent. Sci. 2018, 4, 104–110. [Google Scholar]
  57. Gandolfi, M.G.; Zamparini, F.; Spinelli, A.; Risi, A.; Prati, C. Musculoskeletal disorders among Italian dentists and dental hygienists. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Holzgreve, F.; Fraeulin, L.; Maurer-Grubinger, C.; Betz, W.; Erbe, C.; Weis, T. Effects of Resistance Training as a Behavioural Preventive Measure on Musculoskeletal Complaints, Maximum Strength and Ergonomic Risk in Dentists and Dental Assistants. Sensors 2022, 22, 8069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bakhsh, H.R.; Bakhsh, H.H.; Alotaibi, S.M.; Abuzaid, M.A.; Aloumi, L.A.; Alorf, S.F. Musculoskeletal disorder symptoms in saudi allied dental professionals: Is there an underestimation of related occupational risk factors? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Petrović, V.; Pejčić, N.; Bulat, P.; Đurić-Jovičić, M.; Miljković, N.; Marković, D. Evaluation of ergonomic risks during dental work. Balk. J. Dent. Med. 2016, 20, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Preoteasa, C.T.; Pirvu, C.F.; Axante, A.; Enache, A.M.; Preoteasa, E. Four-Handed Dentistry-Tasks of Team Members and General Rules for Instrument Transfer. Rom. J. Oral Rehabil. 2017, 9, 61–65. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lietz, J.; Ulusoy, N.; Nienhaus, A. Prevention of Musculoskeletal Diseases and Pain among Dental Professionals through Ergonomic Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Fitzpatrick, C.M.; Athwal, A. Celebrating 20 years of open access publishing at BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2020, 21, 20–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sjögårde, P.; Didegah, F. The association between topic growth and citation impact of research publications. Scientometrics 2022, 127, 1903–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Alexopoulos, E.C.; Stathi, I.-C.; Charizani, F. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in dentists. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2004, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Valachi, B.; Valachi, K. Preventing musculoskeletal disorders in clinical dentistry: Strategies to address the mechanisms leading to musculoskeletal disorders. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2003, 134, 1604–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Rising, D.W.; Bennett, B.C.; Hursh, K.; Plesh, O. Reports of body pain in a dental student population. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2005, 136, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ross, A. Human factors and ergonomics for the dental profession. Dent. Update 2016, 43, 688–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hasanain, B. The Role of Ergonomic and Human Factors in Sustainable Manufacturing: A Review. Machines 2024, 12, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 21 00493 g001
Figure 1. Research methods and flow.
Figure 1. Research methods and flow.
Ijerph 21 00493 g001
Ijerph 21 00493 g002
Figure 2. The trend of a count of titles for the year. The year and count of titles filter the view. The year ranges from 1965 to 2023. The count of the title filter ranges from 1 to 43.
Figure 2. The trend of a count of titles for the year. The year and count of titles filter the view. The year ranges from 1965 to 2023. The count of the title filter ranges from 1 to 43.
Ijerph 21 00493 g002
Ijerph 21 00493 g003
Figure 3. Distribution of documents by country.
Figure 3. Distribution of documents by country.
Ijerph 21 00493 g003
Ijerph 21 00493 g004
Figure 4. Bibliometric analysis of sources.
Figure 4. Bibliometric analysis of sources.
Ijerph 21 00493 g004
Ijerph 21 00493 g005
Figure 5. Bibliometric analysis of the number of source citations.
Figure 5. Bibliometric analysis of the number of source citations.
Ijerph 21 00493 g005
Ijerph 21 00493 g006
Figure 6. Network visualization in the analysis of the most frequently cited documents. There are two groups, namely, the first group includes colorful circles, dominated by Alexopoulos E.C. (2004) with the largest circle, and the second group includes transparent gray circles, dominated by Al Wazzan K.A. (2001) with the largest circle. This coloring difference indicates no relationship between the first and second groups. Regarding circle size, the higher the citation weight, the bigger the circle [35].
Figure 6. Network visualization in the analysis of the most frequently cited documents. There are two groups, namely, the first group includes colorful circles, dominated by Alexopoulos E.C. (2004) with the largest circle, and the second group includes transparent gray circles, dominated by Al Wazzan K.A. (2001) with the largest circle. This coloring difference indicates no relationship between the first and second groups. Regarding circle size, the higher the citation weight, the bigger the circle [35].
Ijerph 21 00493 g006
Ijerph 21 00493 g007
Figure 7. Co-authorship network visualization: in the red circle is the combined co-authorship of Clusters 1 and 3; meanwhile, in the green circle, the co-authorship of Cluster 2 is shown.
Figure 7. Co-authorship network visualization: in the red circle is the combined co-authorship of Clusters 1 and 3; meanwhile, in the green circle, the co-authorship of Cluster 2 is shown.
Ijerph 21 00493 g007
Ijerph 21 00493 g008
Figure 8. Bibliometric analysis of co-authorship by country.
Figure 8. Bibliometric analysis of co-authorship by country.
Ijerph 21 00493 g008
Ijerph 21 00493 g009
Figure 9. Overlay visualization map of author keywords from the 1990s to 2023. The color of the circles ranges from blue, which indexes articles with publication years around 2012, to green for 2014–2016, to yellow for 2018, to the latest year, 2023 [39].
Figure 9. Overlay visualization map of author keywords from the 1990s to 2023. The color of the circles ranges from blue, which indexes articles with publication years around 2012, to green for 2014–2016, to yellow for 2018, to the latest year, 2023 [39].
Ijerph 21 00493 g009
Table 1. Data mining with several topics in preliminary research.
Table 1. Data mining with several topics in preliminary research.
Boolean Search SentencesNumber of Documents
(TITLE-ABS-KEY (ergonom*) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (dentist*))634
(TITLE-ABS-KEY (“musculoskeletal disorder*” OR ”MSDs*”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (dentist*))372
(TITLE-ABS-KEY (“work fatigue*” OR ”burnout*”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (dentist*))317
(TITLE-ABS-KEY (“work pressure*” OR ”work stress*” OR “work anxiety*”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (dentist*))43
Table 2. The 20 countries with the most significant number of documents.
Table 2. The 20 countries with the most significant number of documents.
RankCountryRegionClusterDocs.CitationsLinksTotal Link Strength
1United StatesAmerica12891321539801
2IndiaAsia3665775110,642
3BrazilAmerica429223494335
4GermanyEurope725227507187
5Saudi ArabiaAsia422288514634
6SwedenEurope422633493407
7United KingdomEurope522252532742
8IranAsia421307496730
9RomaniaEurope9199744803
10ItalyEurope918169492301
11TurkeyEurasia315152482776
12CanadaAmerica81420941715
13PolandEurope313206471446
14AustraliaOceania812236495514
15FranceEurope8929481218
16MalaysiaAsia108120494210
17SpainEurope16109481479
18FinlandEurope6610744358
19ChinaAsia764141623
20CroatiaEurope262533180
Table 3. The 20 countries with the highest number of citations.
Table 3. The 20 countries with the highest number of citations.
RankCountryRegionClusterDocs.CitationsLinksTotal Link Strength
1United StatesAmerica189132143381
2SwedenEurope22263337197
3IndiaAsia56657736266
4IranAsia42130730160
5Saudi ArabiaAsia12228830108
6GreeceEurope232873078
7United KingdomEurope2222522471
8AustraliaOceania61223634147
9GermanyEurope82522730139
10BrazilAmerica72922330106
11CanadaAmerica4142092269
12PolandEurope3132061951
13NetherlandsEurope451781835
14ItalyEurope10181692780
15TurkeyEurasia5151522070
16MalaysiaAsia381202490
17SpainEurope261092152
18FinlandEurope961071828
19RomaniaEurope121997919
20South KoreaAsia23792145
Table 4. Top-ranking sources with a minimum of 5 documents.
Table 4. Top-ranking sources with a minimum of 5 documents.
RankSourcesCountryISSNDocs.Citationsh-IndexSJR (2022)QPublication Type
1WorkNetherlands18759270
10519815		19338580.509Q2Journals
2Dentistry TodayUnited States875021861873270.102Q4Journals
3International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthSwitzerland16617827 1660460114801670.828Q2Journals
4Journal of The American Dental AssociationUnited States00028177 19434723124601280.520Q2Journals
5Applied ErgonomicsUnited Kingdom18729126 00036870112621190.922Q1Journals
6Journal Of Dental EducationUnited States00220337 1930783711126760.558Q2Journals
7European Journal of Dental EducationUnited Kingdom16000579 1396588311115490.523Q2Journals
8Journal Of Contemporary Dental PracticeUnited States152637119194470.295Q3Journals
9BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersUnited Kingdom1471247474211120.716Q2Journals
10ErgonomicsUnited Kingdom00140139 136658477981240.676Q1Journals
11British Dental JournalUnited Kingdom00070610 14765373750910.506Q2Journals
12Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndia19983603 097092907150500.264Q3Journals
13International Journal of Dental HygieneUnited Kingdom16015029 160150376164440.635Q1Journals
14International Journal of Occupational Safety and ErgonomicsUnited Kingdom10803548680430.513Q2Journals
15Advances In Intelligent Systems and ComputingGermany21945365 2194535761658Discontinued (2021)-Book Series
16Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings of The International DAAAM SymposiumAustria172696796319Not yet assigned a quartile-Conferences and Proceedings
17International Dental JournalNetherlands00206539
1875595X		563730.733Q1Journals
18Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic ResearchIndia0973709X
2249782X		55264Discontinued (2018)-Journals
19Lecture Notes in Networks and SystemsSwitzerland23673370
23673389		51270.151Q4Book Series
Table 5. Top 15 ranked sources with the most citations.
Table 5. Top 15 ranked sources with the most citations.
RankSourcesCountryISSNCitationsDocsh-IndexSJR
(2022)		QSubject Area
1Journal of The American Dental AssociationUnited States00028177 19434723460121280.520Q2Dentistry
Medicine
2BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersUnited Kingdom1471247442171120.716Q2Medicine
3WorkNetherlands18759270
10519815		33819580.509Q2Medicine
4Applied ErgonomicsUnited Kingdom18729126 00036870262111190.922Q1Engineering
Health Professions
Social Sciences
5Journal of Contemporary Dental PracticeUnited States152637111949470.295Q3Dentistry
6Journal of The California Dental AssociationUnited States104322561881044Not yet assigned a quartile-Dentistry
Medicine
7International Journal of Dental HygieneUnited Kingdom16015029
16015037		1646440.635Q1Dentistry
8Indian Journal of Dental ResearchIndia19983603 097092901507500.264Q3Dentistry
Medicine
9Swedish Dental JournalSweden03479994134337Not yet assigned a quartile-Dentistry
Medicine
10Journal of Dental EducationUnited States00220337 1930783712611760.558Q2Dentistry
Medicine
Social Sciences
11European Journal of Dental EducationUnited Kingdom16000579 1396588311511490.523Q2Dentistry
Social Sciences
12Indian Journal of Public Health Research and DevelopmentIndia09765506 09760245111421Not yet assigned a quartile-Medicine
13Annals of Agriculture and Environmental MedicinePoland12321966
18982263		1071610.389Q3Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Environmental Science
Medicine
14Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia BucalSpain16986946 169844471062660.587Q2Dentistry
Medicine
15Journal of Occupational HealthJapan13489585 134191451033670.689Q2Medicine
Table 6. Top 15 most cited documents.
Table 6. Top 15 most cited documents.
RankTitleAuthorsJournalYearCitations
1Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in dentistsAlexopoulos E.C.; Stathi I.C.; Charizani F.BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders2004274
2Preventing musculoskeletal disorders in clinical dentistry: Strategies to address the mechanisms leading to musculoskeletal disordersValachi B.; Valachi K.Journal of The American Dental Association2003139
3Reports of body pain in dental student populationRising D.W.; Bennett B.C.; Hursh K.; Plesh O.Journal of The American Dental Association2005114
4Disorders of the musculoskeletal system among dentists from the aspects of ergonomics and prophylaxisSzymańska J.Annals of Agriculture and Environmental Medicine2002107
5Musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and shoulder in the dental professionsMorse T.; Bruneau H.; Dussetschleger J.Work2010102
6Work characteristics and upper extremity disorders in female dental health workersLindfors P.; von Thiele U.; Lundberg U.Journal of Occupational Health200699
7Burnout and health among Dutch dentistsGorter R.C.; Eijkman M.A.; Hoogstraten J.European Journal of Oral Sciences200099
8Back & neck problems among dentists and dental auxiliariesAl Wazzan K.A.; Almas K.; Al Shethri S.E.; Al-Qahtani M.Q.Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice200193
9Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among dentists-a questionnaire surveyKierklo A.; Kobus A.; Jaworska M.; Botuliński B.Annals of Agriculture and Environmental Medicine201190
10The effect of tool handle shape on hand muscle load and pinch force in a simulated dental scaling taskDong H.; Loomer P.; Barr A.; Laroche C.; Young E.; Rempel D.Applied Ergonomics200782
11Low back problems and possible improvements in nursing jobsVieira E.R.; Kumar S.; Coury H.J.C.G.; Narayan Y.Journal Of Advanced Nursing200670
12Evaluating dental office ergonomic risk factors and hazardsBramson J.B.; Smith S.; Romagnoli G.Journal of The American Dental Association199861
13Evaluation of ergonomic interventions to reduce musculoskeletal disorders of dentists in the NetherlandsDroeze E.H.; Jonsson H.Work200561
14Perceived musculoskeletal symptoms among dental students in the clinic work environmentThornton L.J.; Barr A.E.; Stuart-Buttle C.; Gaughan J.P.; Wilson E.R.; Jackson A.D.; Wyszynski T.C.; Smarkola C.Ergonomics200859
15Pain and discomfort in the musculoskeletal system among dentists. A prospective studyRundcrantz B.L.; Johnsson B.; Moritz U.Swedish Dental Journal199158
Table 7. Top 10 countries in co-authorship.
Table 7. Top 10 countries in co-authorship.
RankCountryClusterDocs.CitationsLinksTotal Link StrengthCollaborating Countries
1United States38913211525Brazil, Nigeria, Iran, Malaysia, Australia, India, Germany, China, Canada, Japan, United Kingdom
2India16657759Malaysia, Australia, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, United States
3Brazil102922337United States, Canada, Portugal
4Germany62522744United States, United Arab Emirates, Lithuania, China
5United Kingdom2222521119Netherlands, South Africa, Belgium, Trinidad and Tobago, Canada, Australia, United States, Romania
6Saudi Arabia42228858United Arab Emirates, Sweden, India, Egypt
7Sweden42263334Saudi Arabia, Canada, Netherlands
8Iran12130723United States, South Korea
9Romania5199734United Kingdom, Italy, Turkey
10Italy51816922Romania
Table 8. Grouping of author keyword visualization overlays up to 2023.
Table 8. Grouping of author keyword visualization overlays up to 2023.
CategoryAuthors’ KeywordsCo-OccurrencesLinkTotal Link StrengthAvg. Pub. Year.
Research subjectsDentists 88311772017.07
Dental students3523782016.40
Dental hygienists1212292015.25
Dental staff616242009.17
MethodSurvey and questionnaires1218302010.75
Electromyography 87162013.25
Kinematic analysis85162019.50
Rula77162018.43
Occupational health and MSDsMusculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)124322742016.85
Risk factors 1919542016.42
Occupational hazards1619422013.81
Prevalence 1615372015.44
Occupational health1515392014.80
Back pain1315342014.46
Neck pain1013322018
Pain 1014282015.50
Prevention 1012212011.80
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders109212015
Lower back pain911282017.78
Occupational diseases810192012.75
Stress 811152014.88
Cumulative trauma disorders710162014.57
Musculoskeletal system 617222017.50
Carpal tunnel syndrome69212016.17
Upper extremity5572018
ErgonomicsErgonomics147332782015.80
Dentistry65251132014.57
Posture2820692016.25
Dental ergonomics1614222017.19
Magnification1411322018.79
Dental8572010
Preventive measurements5582013
Knowledge and EducationDental education610162017.67
Knowledge56112020.60
Table 9. Top 15 co-cited authors in ergonomic and dentist references.
Table 9. Top 15 co-cited authors in ergonomic and dentist references.
RankAuthorsClusterCo-CitationsLinksTotal Link Strength
1Smith, D.R.42441639793
2Valachi, B.21671635822
3Moritz, U.11431635093
4Valachi, K.21261634576
5Cockrell, D.41211634606
6Hayes, M.J.41211634901
7Leggat, P.A.21151634940
8Johnsson, B.11101623828
9Akesson, I.11041634013
10Skerfving, S.1921603565
11Finsen, L.1891633229
12Christensen, H.1841633065
13Ohlendorf, D.3761555471
14Szymanska, J.2751582135
15Kedjarune, U.2731633160
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Anggraini, W.; Ranggaini, D.; Ariyani, A.P.; Sulistyowati, I. World Trends in Dental Ergonomics Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21040493

AMA Style

Anggraini W, Ranggaini D, Ariyani AP, Sulistyowati I. World Trends in Dental Ergonomics Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21(4):493. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21040493

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anggraini, Wita, Dewi Ranggaini, Annisaa Putri Ariyani, and Indrani Sulistyowati. 2024. "World Trends in Dental Ergonomics Research: A Bibliometric Analysis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21, no. 4: 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21040493

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop