Skip to Content
Current OncologyCurrent Oncology
  • Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
  • Article
  • Open Access

1 December 2012

Population-Based Home Care Services in Breast Cancer: Utilization and Costs

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
1
Health Outcomes and Pharmaco Economic (HOPE) Research Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
2
Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
3
International Centre for Health Innovation (ICHI), Richard Ivey School of Business, Western University, London, ON, Canada
4
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

Objective: To determine utilization and costs of home care services (HCS) for individuals with a diagnosis of breast cancer (BC). Methods: Incident cases of invasive BC in women were extracted from the Ontario Cancer Registry (2005–2009) and linked with other Ontario health care administrative databases. Control patients were selected from the population of women never diagnosed with any type of cancer. The types and proportions of HCS used were determined and stratified by disease stage. Attributable home care utilization and costs for BC patients were determined. Factors associated with HCS costs were assessed using regression analysis. Results: Among the 39,656 BC and 198,280 control patients identified (median age: 61.6 years for both), 75.4% of BC patients used HCS (62.1% stage I; 85.7% stage II; 94.6% stage III; 79.1% stage IV) compared with 14.6% of control patients. The number of HCS used per patient–year were significantly higher for the BC patients than for the control patients (14.97 vs. 6.13, p < 0.01), resulting in higher costs per patient–year ($1,210 vs. $325; $885 attributable cost to BC, p < 0.01). The number of HCS utilized and the associated costs increased as the BC stage increased. In contrast, HCS costs decreased as income increased and as previous health care exposure decreased. Interpretation: Patients with BC used twice as many HCS, resulting in costs that were almost 4 times those observed in a matched control group. Less than an additional $1000 per BC patient per year were spent on HCS utilization in the study population.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.