Next Article in Journal
A Novel Robust Model Predictive Controller for Aerospace Three-Phase PWM Rectifiers
Previous Article in Journal
Pseudo-Elastic Response of Gas Bearing Clastic Formations: An Italian Case Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Approach for the Selection of Power-Generation Technology Using a Linguistic Neutrosophic CODAS Method: A Case Study in Libya

1
University of Defence in Belgrade, Military Academy, Department of Logistics, Pavla Jurisica Sturma 33, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
2
University of Misurata, Faculty of Engineering, Misurata 999116, Libya
3
University Union—Nikola Tesla, Faculty for Ecology and Environmental Protection, Cara Dušana 62-64, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
4
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture, Bulevar kralja Aleksandra 73, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2018, 11(9), 2489; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092489
Submission received: 2 September 2018 / Revised: 13 September 2018 / Accepted: 15 September 2018 / Published: 19 September 2018

Abstract

Rapid increases in energy demand and international drive to reduce carbon emissions from fossil fuels have led many oil-rich countries to diversify their energy portfolio and resources. Libya is one of these countries, and it has recently become interested in utilizing its renewable-energy resources in order to reduce financial and energy dependency on oil reserves. This paper introduces an original multicriteria decision-making Pairwise-CODAS model in which the modification of the CODAS method was made using Linguistic Neutrosophic Numbers (LNN). The paper also suggests a new LNN Pairwise (LNN PW) model for determining the weight coefficients of the criteria developed by the authors. By integrating these models with linguistic neutrosophic numbers, it was shown that it is possible to a significant extent to eliminate subjective qualitative assessments and assumptions by decision makers in complex decision-making conditions. The LNN PW-CODAS model was tested and validated in a case study of the selection of optimal Power-Generation Technology (PGT) in Libya. Testing of the model showed that the proposed model based on linguistic neutrosophic numbers provides objective expert evaluation by eliminating subjective assessments when determining the numerical values of criteria. A sensitivity analysis of the LNN PW-CODAS model, carried out through 68 scenarios of changes in the weight coefficients, showed a high degree of stability of the solutions obtained in the ranking of the alternatives. The results were validated by comparison with LNN extensions of four multicriteria decision-making models.
Keywords: linguistic neutrosophic numbers; CODAS; multicriteria decision-making; power generation technology linguistic neutrosophic numbers; CODAS; multicriteria decision-making; power generation technology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pamučar, D.; Badi, I.; Sanja, K.; Obradović, R. A Novel Approach for the Selection of Power-Generation Technology Using a Linguistic Neutrosophic CODAS Method: A Case Study in Libya. Energies 2018, 11, 2489. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092489

AMA Style

Pamučar D, Badi I, Sanja K, Obradović R. A Novel Approach for the Selection of Power-Generation Technology Using a Linguistic Neutrosophic CODAS Method: A Case Study in Libya. Energies. 2018; 11(9):2489. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092489

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pamučar, Dragan, Ibrahim Badi, Korica Sanja, and Radojko Obradović. 2018. "A Novel Approach for the Selection of Power-Generation Technology Using a Linguistic Neutrosophic CODAS Method: A Case Study in Libya" Energies 11, no. 9: 2489. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092489

APA Style

Pamučar, D., Badi, I., Sanja, K., & Obradović, R. (2018). A Novel Approach for the Selection of Power-Generation Technology Using a Linguistic Neutrosophic CODAS Method: A Case Study in Libya. Energies, 11(9), 2489. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092489

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop