1. Introduction
DC power supplies and load devices are core devices for energy conversion and diversified applications. They are widely used in various industries, from power adapters and switching power supplies to DC power transmission and distribution systems. High-performance, low-energy, energy-saving power supplies are important for efficient energy use. With the rapid development of power electronics and control technology, high-performance DC power supplies can be used as general-purpose power supplies such as DC system power supplies, communication base station power supplies, and experimental test power supplies. It can also be used as a photovoltaic analog power supply, a programmable power supply, a DC motor characteristic simulator, a special power supply, etc., which is receiving more and more attention.
In this study, the topology and control strategy of the above-mentioned high-performance DC power supply were taken as the research objectives; taking the photovoltaic battery analog power supply as a representative case, a high-precision wide-range hybrid topology and a control strategy are proposed to simulate the characteristics of photovoltaic cells under different environmental conditions. According to the technical requirements of actual photovoltaic cells, the designed topology should have zero to open circuit voltage and zero to short circuit current, large capacity, high efficiency and power factor, high power density, fast dynamic response and low harmonic pollution, which are also the requirements of most high-performance DC power supplies. If the designed DC power energy can be fed back to the grid, the proposed topology can be extended to enable bidirectional flow of energy.
At present, high-performance high-power DC power supply is mainly based on the research of linear power supply and pulse width modulation (PWM) switching power supply. Due to its large size and low efficiency, the linear system loses energy on the power tube when it is used as a load, and fails to return energy to the power grid, which cannot meet the requirements of high power [
1]. As a topology of high-power DC power supply and electronic load, PWM switching topology is a hot topic of current research. With the development of power electronics technology and control technology, voltage source PWM converter has been widely used in various fields, and research on control methods and modulation methods has emerged in an endless stream. Bai, H. et al. [
2] and Karthikeyan, V. et al. [
3] studied different control methods of high-performance power supply DC-DC converters. Bai, H. et al. [
2] proposed a novel dual-phase-shift control strategy for a dual-active-bridge isolated bidirectional DC-DC converter to eliminate reactive power and increase system efficiency. Karthikeyan, V. et al. [
3] proposed a varying phase angle control in isolated bidirectional dc–dc converter for integrating battery storage unit to a DC link in a standalone solar photovoltaic system. Zhao, C. et al. [
4] and Tsang, K.M. et al. [
5] innovated the topology of the voltage source DC-DC converter. Zhao, C. et al. [
4] proposed an isolated three-port bidirectional DC-DC converter composed of three full-bridge cells and a high-frequency transformer, ensuring the minimum overall system losses. Tsang, K.M. et al. [
5] implemented a fast-acting regenerative dc electronic load based on the single-ended primary inductor converter (SEPIC) converter.
In addition to the voltage source type converter, there is the current source one. At present, research on current source converters also receives great attention. The research content is mainly focused on control strategies, and most studies use current space vector control. Lopes, L.A.C. et al. [
6] discussed the use of space vector modulation techniques to enhance the performance of a bidirectional three-SCR four-switch hybrid current source converter (HCSC). Gao, H. et al. [
7] presented a model predictive switching pattern control for a current-source converter (CSC), which achieves superb low-order harmonics elimination performance in steady state and improved transient responses. Due to the overlap time causing negative influence in the output current waveform, Geng, Y. et al. [
8] proposed overlap-time compensation method, which can effectively decrease the current harmonics introduced by the overlap time and improve the output current of the inverter. In the photovoltaic grid-connected application, current source inverters for detailed research have been used [
9,
10,
11]. Chen, D. et al. [
9] proposed a circuit topology of a single stage three-phase current-source photovoltaic grid-connected inverter with high voltage transmission ratio, which can suppress the energy storage switch’s turn-off voltage spike. Rajeev, M. et al. [
10] proposed a modified single-phase current source inverter with improved multi-loop control for photovoltaic interface application. Sun, Y. et al. [
11] proposed a split-capacitor four-wire current source inverter, which is the dual of the split-capacitor four-wire voltage source inverter. In addition, the application of current source converters has gradually appeared in applications that were originally suitable for voltage source converters. For example, the following six articles respectively applied current source converters to micro-grid [
12], wind turbine [
13], multilevel converter [
14], energy management in traction applications [
15], indirect matrix converter [
16] and permanent magnet synchronous motor drive [
17]. It can be seen that the current source type converter has characteristics that make the control method and application research more and more in-depth and extensive.
When the voltage source converter is used as a controllable rectifier, the minimum output voltage on the DC side is close to the peak voltage on the AC side. Moreover, due to the existence of the control dead zone and the stable DC-DC optimal gain ratio requirement, the high-precision control of the low-voltage and small-current is basically impossible, and thus the field of the high-performance wide-range DC power supply is limited. Although the current source type PWM converter has a wide range of DC voltage output, since the DC side current polarity cannot be changed, the power supply and load switching can only be realized by changing the voltage polarity, and its application range and occasion are also greatly limited. Therefore, based on the research of the current source converter topology, PWM pulse logic, modeling method and control strategy, a high-frequency isolation hybrid topology based on current-source/voltage-source converter is proposed in this paper. The current source type converter is controlled by the voltage space vector control method instead of the current space vector control method. On the basis of this, a hybrid topology overall control strategy based on current compensation and sliding mode variable structure is proposed, which has the advantages of being a high-capacity, high-precision, high-efficiency platform and a power factor platform of both current source converters and voltage source converters.
The organization of this paper is as follows. In
Section 1, the topology and control requirements of high-precision wide-range power supplies based on the performance requirements of photovoltaic cell analog power supplies is discussed. In
Section 2, a hybrid topology based on a current source converter is proposed and its working principle is analyzed. In
Section 3, the equivalent model of hybrid topology is established, and the hybrid topology control strategy based on sliding mode variable structure and current compensation control is proposed and studied. In
Section 4, the proposed hybrid topology and control strategy is simulated. In
Section 5, the prototype design, the experimental study of hybrid topology and control, and the application test verification of photovoltaic cell simulation are presented. In
Section 6, the paper is summarized.
3. Hybrid Converter Topology
Usually, the high-power power supply for the wide output range of the rectifier often uses a voltage source type AC-DC and DC-DC two-stage converter topology. However, the three-phase voltage source AC-DC converter used in such a converter belongs to a boost converter, and the minimum voltage on the DC bus side is about the peak value of the AC grid line, and the voltage source converter has a dead zone during the control process. Even if a DC-DC is added, it is difficult to adjust the voltage in a wide range due to the limit voltage of the gain ratio. The current adjustment range is also the same, especially when both the voltage and the current are low. Therefore, this paper proposes a new hybrid converter topology based on current source converters to avoid the above problems. At the same time, through the design of the control strategy, the problem of unstable control and poor precision of the current source converter at low voltage and small current can be solved.
In view of the above analysis, a novel hybrid topology is proposed, which is composed of a current source type AC-DC converter, a current source type DC-AC converter, a high frequency transformer and a voltage source type AC-DC converter, as shown in
Figure 3. In this paper, the three-phase AC voltage source is used as the main input power source for the solar cell model because the three-phase AC voltage source can achieve higher power and does not cause grid imbalance. CSCI is used in the first stage because the voltage source converter type cannot achieve a wide range of voltage and current variations from zero to maximum required for photovoltaic cell simulation. Since the current source converter current can only flow in one direction, to match CSCI, the second stage also uses a current source converter to ensure the circulation path. According to the characteristics of the current source type converter, the current can range from zero to the rated value, so the voltage can also be adjusted in a wide range. Energy is absorbed from the three-phase grid to supply DC output. The path of energy flow flows from the three-phase grid through the LC filter into the three-phase current source converter (CSCI). The rectified energy passes through a current source type DC-AC converter (CSCII), a high frequency transformer (HFT), and a voltage source type AC-DC converter (VSCI) to output a DC with adjustable voltage and current.
The specific working principle is shown in
Figure 4. The three-phase AC-DC current source type converter (
S11~
S16) operates in the three-phase current source type PWM mode, and the current and voltage on the grid side are controlled in the same phase. The CSCII (
S21~
S24) on the primary side of the high-frequency transformer obtains a 50% duty cycle current source type PWM pulse. The current source type PWM requires that the upper and lower arms need to be overlapped, that is, simultaneously turned on to maintain the current path. The VSCI on the secondary side of the high-frequency transformer can be a half-bridge full-wave rectifier or a single-phase full-bridge rectifier. In this paper, a single-phase full-bridge diode rectifier is used. The circulation switch
S17 is always in the ON state, and the freewheeling switching is automatically performed according to the ON and OFF states of
S11 to
S16, thereby ensuring the circulation path and improving the efficiency. The energy is transmitted to the DC side via the AC-DC converter CSCI, the DC inductor
LDC, and the converter CSCII. The current flowing through the input side is: phase
U →
D11 → S11 → LDC → D21 → S21 → HFT →
D24 → S24 → D14 → S14 → phase
V. The current flowing through the output side is: DC output side
N→
D34→HFT→
D31→Filter
Lf1→DC output side P. Since the input and output sides are electrically isolated by a high-frequency transformer, in the case of high-power output, the output side can be connected in multiple stages in parallel to increase the output power.
If energy bidirectional flow is required, it is only necessary to replace the VSCI in the topology from a non-controllable diode rectifier to a controllable single-phase H-bridge, as shown in
Figure 5. When energy is delivered from VSCI to CSCII, VSCI’s
S31 to
S34 use a 50% duty cycle PWM pulse, while
S21 to
S24 use full conduction to rectify, allowing energy to flow in the opposite direction. When energy is delivered from CSCII to VSCI and CSCII, the
S21 to
S24 use a 50% duty cycle PWM pulse, the VSCI’s
S31 to
S34 are all turned off, and the VSCI is equivalent to an uncontrolled rectifier bridge composed of an IGBT freewheeling diode. The principle is the same as that shown in
Figure 4. The energy bidirectional flow topology is suitable for applications such as battery charging and discharging, energy storage systems, and DC motor simulation. When used as a photovoltaic cell analog or general high-performance power supply, the uncontrollable rectifier bridge can be selected to reduce costs. The control method for the two-way flow of energy is introduced in
Section 4, and verified in
Section 5 by system simulation.
4. Hybrid Topology Control Strategy
4.1. Three-Phase Current Type PWM Pulse Logic
The three-phase current source type converter usually adopts current space vector control to divide the spatial angle into six regions, as shown in
Figure 6a, in which any current vector will fall in one of the six regions. The vector can be generated equivalently to two adjacent current vectors and zero vectors.
The calculation conditions for the ideal current source duty cycle are as follows:
- (1)
The DC current is large enough, and the instantaneous DC current of the switch on/off is unchanged.
- (2)
The DC current is continuous.
The formula for calculating the duty ratio is as follows:
where
iS is current vector value and
IDCL is current value of DC inductor
L.
As can be seen from Equation (8), the present calculation method has the following problems. When the direct current is relatively small or the direct current is discontinuous, especially when it is close to zero, the calculation error of Equation (8) is relatively large, and the current control is likely to resonate. In addition, to measure the AC side current, two current sensors are required at the minimum. Since the DC inductance L is relatively small, the current will change when the switch is on/off, and a more stable and reliable calculation method needs to be designed.
According to the state of the AC side switch of the three-phase current source type PWM converter, it is known that the voltage on the AC side is applied to both ends of the DC inductor
L. From the AC side, this voltage is based on the six voltage vectors generated by the AC switch. The current space vector shown in
Figure 6a substantially coincides with the voltage vector shown in
Figure 6b.
It can be seen from the analysis that:
- (1)
The same as the generation of the arbitrary current vector of the interval, it is also possible to generate a voltage vector of an arbitrary interval.
- (2)
According to the voltage vector, a voltage of any size on the DC side can be obtained.
- (3)
According to the voltage on the DC side, instantaneous control of the DC side current can be performed. According to the control of the DC current, the control of the AC current is realized.
- (4)
The phase control of the AC current is performed according to the phase of the AC voltage.
Therefore, instead of the current vector method, a duty ratio calculation method of controlling the instantaneous value of the DC inductance L current by an equivalent voltage vector can be employed. This method has many advantages. The instantaneous feedback control of inductance current on the dc side has a fast and stable response, which avoid divergence or inaccuracy control of Equation (8) caused by insufficient current accuracy or current interruption. When the voltage space vector is used, the denominator of the duty ratio of the load is calculated to be near the rated value, which improves the accuracy and reliability of the control.
To reduce harmonics and spike voltage, and improve the life and reliability of switching devices, the PWM also needs to find the optimal switching sequence during switching. In the process of switching, to generate the voltage space vector in the second region of π/6 to π/2, as shown in
Figure 6b, switching of the voltage vectors
V1 and
V2 is performed.
Figure 7a shows the current direction when voltage vector
V1 and
V2 are switched.
Figure 7b,c illustrate the voltages
VD11 and currents
iD11 across
D11 when
V1 is switched to
V2 in the two states of line voltage
Vuv > 0 or
Vuv < 0. The two cases are as follows:
As shown in
Figure 7b, when
Vuv > 0, and
V1 is switched to
V2, since
VD11 < 0, the spike voltage is relatively small. (Because
Vuv is added at both ends of
S11, it is difficult to generate spike voltage.)
As shown in
Figure 7c, when
Vuv < 0, and
V1 is switched to
V2, since
VD11 < 0, the spike voltage is relatively large.
Therefore, to suppress the spike voltage, it is necessary to divide the same region into two small regions of π/6, and the vector voltages are sequentially switched according to the line voltage to suppress the spike voltage. In fact, the entire voltage space will be divided into 12 areas, for example:
In the second zone, when
Vuv >0 in the interval of π/6 to π/3, the order of switching is
![Energies 12 00039 i001]()
In the second zone, when
Vuv <0 in the interval of π/3 to π/2, the order of switching is
![Energies 12 00039 i002]()
To avoid the shock, the pulse overlap time of the current source type PWM should also be considered. The current source type switch is switched between “on” and “off”. To ensure continuous current, the current switch must be “off” after the next switch “on”. The time when the two switches are “on” together becomes the overlap time of the current source type PWM for the freewheeling of the current.
4.2. Hybrid Converter Equivalent Model and Control Strategy
According to the working principle of the topology, the hybrid topology can be equivalent. The equivalent model is shown in
Figure 8, that is, the AC/DC current source type converter, DC inductor, and load, etc. constitute the basic buck circuit, among which the AC voltage is equivalent to the DC power supply
Vs according to the PWM motion vector synthesis of the three-phase current-type converter switch tube, the load side is equivalent to the DC capacitor, S is equivalent to the six effective switching vector states of the three-phase current converter. Part D serves as a three-zero equivalent relationship with the six switches of the three-phase current source type converter, that is, the upper and lower tubes of the same bridge arm are simultaneously turned on, and can also be regarded as the equivalent relationship of the main circuit
D17 and
S17 freewheeling path. Therefore, the hybrid topology can control the DC inductor current
iL as the buck circuit.
The relationship between the current of the DC inductor and the state of the switch is shown in
Figure 9. To improve the response speed, the sliding mode variable structure is adopted to control the current.
When the switch is turned on, Equations (9)–(11) can be obtained.
where
Vs is the equivalent voltage. When the switch is turned off, Equation (12) can be obtained.
m is defined as the duty cycle and
TS is the switching period. If
i3 is given as the current reference value
i*, the
i1 tracking
i* can be realized by the sliding mode regulator controlling the duty ratio
m. The current error
e is defined as the state variable, and the state error equation can be expressed as
The “chattering” phenomenon is suppressed by second-order sliding mode control, and the sliding surface is defined as:
where
k is the integral coefficient, which determines the convergence speed of the tracking error.
The exponential approach is chosen to design the sliding mode controller, i.e.,
The control rate is calculated and selected as follows,
Sliding mode variable structure control has strong robustness and complete adaptability to system external interference and modeling dynamics, as well as advantages such as reduced order, decoupling, fast response, good dynamic characteristics, and easy implementation. Therefore, this paper uses sliding mode variable structure control to achieve the control of voltage variation. From the basic principle of the sliding mode variable structure, when the sliding surface and the control rate are selected, the sliding mode variable structure control system can be completely established.
According to the equivalent model, the control block diagram is shown in
Figure 10, where
idc0 is the current that does not pass through the filter after the high-frequency transformer output is rectified, and
idc1 is the actual output value of the entire topology.
idc* is the expected output value of the entire topology. Their specific locations in the topology are shown in
Figure 4. Since the secondary side of the high-frequency transformer has a filter, to improve the current control accuracy, the filter current needs to be compensated. Therefore, the PI control is added to compensate the capacitance current, and Δ
idc is the filter capacitor current compensation value. This paper controls the current
idc* equivalently by controlling the voltage
vDC across the
LDC. By introducing the feedforward amount
Vdc, the system response time is reduced, that is, the expected output value of the entire topology
idc* is equivalently controlled by controlling the voltage variation Δ
vs across the inductor. Since this paper obtains a high-precision and wide-range photovoltaic cell simulator by following the I-V curve of the photovoltaic cell with power electronics, it is necessary to give the illumination intensity and temperature parameters of the photovoltaic panel, and then the IV curve can be uniquely determined according to the idc1 and
Vdc of the load end, whereby the system can follow the output characteristics of the photovoltaic panel according to closed loop control. The I-V curves of photovoltaic panels at different light intensities and temperatures can be obtained from Equations (5)–(7).
If this topology is applied for battery simulation, electronic load, etc., the topological structure of high frequency transformer secondary side must be replaced for controlled single phase full bridge, as shown in
Figure 5. In the control, only the
S31 to
S34 of the VSCI in the above control strategy adopt the 50% duty cycle PWM pulse, and the
S21 to
S24 adopts the full conduction mode to form the rectification, so that the opposite direction of energy flow can be realized.
5. Simulation Verification and Analysis
Combined with the analysis of hybrid topology and control strategy, considering the secondary side of the high-frequency transformer adopting the controllable single-phase full bridge, the wide-range photovoltaic simulation of this paper can be realized, and the reverse flow of energy can be realized to the grid. To make simulation verification more universal, the simulation verified the topology and control strategy with energy bidirectional flow. The circuit parameters were as follows: DC inductance,
LDC = 0.25 mH; AC filter capacitor,
Cu =
Cv =
Cw = 75
μF; and filter inductor,
Lu =
Lv =
Lw = 9.2 mH. The simulation block diagram is shown in
Figure 11.
(1) Stable load verification
In
Figure 12,
Iout2 is the DC side output current when the system is working as a power supply,
Iin2 is the DC side input current when the system is used as an electronic load,
Iref is the system given current,
PulseReady is the system opening operation signal, and
vu and
iu are
u phase voltage and current on the grid side of the system. It can be seen in
Figure 12a,b that the system startup sequence is valid and can be stably operated in a separate power and inverter mode for a given implementation.
(2) Dynamic tracking verification
In
Figure 13,
Idc is the DC current of the system,
Iref is the given current of the system, and
PulseFlag is the working signal of the different states of the system. As shown in
Figure 13a, the system has fast tracking capability and bidirectional conversion function. It can perform mode conversion according to the given mode and can perform stably. As shown in
Figure 13b, it can be concluded that the system has a fast dynamic response capability; even in the transient state of mode transformation, it still has a good response capability. As shown in
Figure 13c, the system exhibits good homomorphic tracking and stability under different loads and different modes.
In summary, the simulation results verify the correctness of the proposed topology and control strategy. The simulation results show that the system has good control tracking performance and steady state performance in both stable and variable loads, and for the extended energy bidirectional flow function. It also has good control effects and meets the expected design requirements.