Next Article in Journal
The Concept of Using an Expert System and Multi-Valued Logic Trees to Assess the Energy Consumption of an Electric Car in Selected Driving Cycles
Next Article in Special Issue
New Wearable Technologies and Devices to Efficiently Scavenge Energy from the Human Body: State of the Art and Future Trends
Previous Article in Journal
Will Oil Price Volatility Cause Market Panic?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Voltage Improvement of a Swing-Magnet-Type Generator for Harvesting Bicycle Vibrations

Faculty of Engineering, Shinshu University, Nagano 380-8553, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(13), 4630; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134630
Submission received: 20 May 2022 / Revised: 22 June 2022 / Accepted: 23 June 2022 / Published: 24 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Harvesting State of the Art and Challenges)

Abstract

:
This paper proposes a swing-magnet-type generator that utilizes environment vibration for energy harvesting applications. This device consisted of a liquid, a swing magnet with a float, and a coil, and it was expected to generate electricity using the minute vibration of a bicycle. The vibration of the wide frequency band of the bicycle was converted into a vibration of a low-frequency mover. The yoke size of the permanent magnet affected the linkage flux and swing characteristics. Therefore, we verified the effect of the mover characteristics on the swing moment by structural simulations and vibration experiments using a linear motor. The yoke size changed the torque, which affected the resonant frequency of the swing. The magnetic-field analysis revealed the effect on the flux linkage in the yoke. The output voltage of the generator in the bicycle was 2.1 V, which could power a light-emitting diode.

1. Introduction

Energy harvesting is a sustainable technology that extracts electricity from the energy spent in daily-life activities of people [1,2,3,4,5]. Consumer products with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) attached to shoes and straps have been developed to identify their position in the dark [6,7]. In addition, the number of small devices for measurement and communication has increased with the development of the Internet of Things [8,9,10]. These devices use batteries as power source because the voltage and power required for their operation are small [11]. However, used batteries need to be discarded, which causes a high environmental load. In addition, batteries need to be replaced; thus, maintenance costs tend to increase [12]. The development of energy harvesting technology is important for realizing battery-free devices. The energy sources for energy harvesting include vibration, heat, light, and electromagnetic waves [13,14,15].
Daily environmental vibrations include traffic vibrations resulting from the movement of cars or trains, mechanical vibrations due to the operation of large machines, and floor vibrations in buildings [16,17,18,19]. These vibrations are often discarded. A generator that uses a shock absorber for suspension has been proposed for automobiles [20]. The vibration in the direction of gravity was converted into electric power using a linear electric motor, which led to the recovery of 1-kW on power in a highway truck [21].
The bicycle that is focused on in the present study constantly generates vibrations in the three-dimensional (3D) direction while moving and is expected to be a semipermanent energy source [22,23]. The use of piezoelectric elements as a vibration power generation device is effective for obtaining high voltage [24,25]. A piezo harvester with a cantilever structure that used resonance to increase power generation has been proposed [26]. An energy harvester structure with a liquid chip at the tip of the lever has enabled power generation of approximately 1 mW when mounted on a bicycle [22]. An energy harvester that employed electrostatic induction was also effective for achieving a high voltage output [27]. The contact charging mechanism of a tandem spring-mass structure enabled power generation in a wide frequency band, and an instantaneous output voltage that exceeded 150 V has been confirmed [28]. Electromagnetic induction power generation has been proposed by installing a coil on the handlebar of a bicycle and a reciprocating magnet in the tube [29,30]. This method used the lateral vibration of the bicycle frame to achieve an output power density of 0.1 mW/cm3. In addition, LED lighting devices that used magnets near the metal rims of the wheels have been developed. These devices generated electricity by changing the flux linkage of the coil due to vibration during operation [31].
The present paper proposes a swing-magnet-type wave-power generator, which floats a magnet on a liquid in a container with a coil wrapped around it. The vibration of the bicycle is converted into a liquid wave, which becomes the mechanical input power for the generator. Even a small vibration can lead to swing amplitude above a certain level, and power is generated via electromagnetic induction of the magnet and coil. In addition, the magnet swing that uses liquid can extract the low-frequency-band components from the bicycle vibration in a wide frequency band. Furthermore, the container structure of the cylinder can convert the vibration along the horizontal direction into electrical energy, without employing a complicated structure. A generator comprising a liquid, coil, and magnet provides high structural and electrical reliability.
In Section 2, the proposed swing-magnet-type generator with a cylindrical structure is presented. We report the vibration of a moving bicycle and the swing characteristics of the mover in the proposed generator. In Section 3, the relationship between the specifications of the generator mover and swing characteristics using structural simulation and vibration experiment are explained. In Section 4, the flux linkage of the device obtained using magnetic simulation is presented. We then report the results of the driving of a bicycle test equipped with the proposed device.

2. Proposal for a Swing-Magnet-Type Generator

2.1. Bicycle Vibration Characteristics

Figure 1 shows the measurement results of the acceleration when the bicycle ran on an asphalt road at a constant speed of 10 km/h. Figure 1a shows the bicycle direction when it ran along on the x-axis, Figure 1b shows the direction along and perpendicular to the moving direction on the y-axis, and Figure 1c shows the acceleration in the direction perpendicular to the ground on the z-axis. Figure 1d shows the sensor position of the bicycle and the axes in each direction. The acceleration was measured at a period of 5 ms using a small wireless recorder (Microstone Co., Ltd., Saku-city, Japan, MVP-RF10-AC). These results were filtered from 1 Hz to 100 Hz to eliminate the effects of high-frequency noise and gravitational acceleration. Vibration was constantly generated on all axes due to the bicycle run. Acceleration occurred in the x and y-axis directions due to the bicycle’s motion.
Figure 2 shows the frequency distribution obtained by Fourier transformation of the acceleration generated during the bicycle run. The frequency component of the acceleration of each axis was dispersed in a wide frequency range. Acceleration components appear not only on the z-axis but also on the x-axis in the direction of bicycle’s motion.

2.2. Structure of the Swing-Magnet-Type Generator

Figure 3a–c shows the external, plan, and cross-sectional views, respectively, of the swing-magnet-type generator proposed in this paper. The container used a bush vial with an outer diameter of 35 mm and contained a liquid. This study used water as the liquid in the container. The mover inside the container was composed of a floating body and a permanent magnet, which floated on the liquid. A coil was wound around the container. The bicycle vibration caused the mover to swing through the liquid, which generated an induced electromotive force in the coil.
The mover used a polystyrene cylinder as a floating body inside the ring magnet for buoyancy. The dimensions of the ring magnet were 19 mm inner diameter, 31 mm outer diameter, and 3-mm thick (Figure 4). The permanent magnet used N40 (Arnold Magnetic Technologies Corporation) which has the following magnetic characteristics: remanence Br = 1.27 T, coercivity Hc = 923 kA/m, and maximum energy product BHmax = 318 kJ/m2. The yoke used in this study is a steel plate cold commercial (SPCC). Mount the yoke symmetrically on permanent magnet can improve the coil flux linkage and enhance the swing effect.
The coil conductor diameter was 0.1 mm, and it was wound 1872 times around a bobbin with an inner diameter of 35 mm. The winding diameter and number of turns were set based on the forward voltage of the diode. The internal resistance of the coil was 0.5 kΩ. The large number of coil turns increased the induced electromotive force, and the internal resistance of the coil, whereas it reduced the output current. The number of coil turns must be set by considering the required output voltage. A ring magnet was installed in the middle of the two coils.
The input power to the generator due to the vibration of the liquid is expressed by the wave height, group velocity and vibration frequency. The generator size needs to be considered with respect to the input power. Large input energy requires an increase in generator size. The mass and moment of inertia can be used to determine the mover of the generator with respect to the resonance frequency, as shown in Section 3.3. The number of turns and size of the coil are determined by considering the voltage required for output.

2.3. Characteristic of the Swing-Magnet-Type Generator

The swing characteristics of the mover were evaluated using the tilt angle measurement of the mover. The tilt angle was measured using motion-analysis software Kinovea ver. 0.9.5 by Joan Charmant (Bordeaux, France) [32,33]. The mover movement was recorded using a smartphone at a frame rate of 240 frames per second and a resolution of 1920 × 1080 px. The video is captured by the software. The coordinate value was extracted from the motion trajectory of the mover, by tracking an arbitrary point on the screen. The tilt angle of the mover was measured by tracking two points in the mover and one point as reference in the container, as shown in Figure 5. The bicycle-mounted container was completely fixed to the basket support. The tilt angle was measured relative to the bicycle basket support.
Figure 6a shows the fixed position of the generator near the front basket. The bicycle-mounted container is completely fixed to the basket support. Figure 6b shows the tilt angle definition, which indicated the tilt from the balanced state (θ = 0). Figure 6c shows the tilt angle characteristics of the proposed generator mounted on a bicycle while being operated. The mover swung at a maximum tilt angle of approximately 15° and frequency of approximately 2 Hz when the bicycle was moving. Figure 6d shows the result of the Fourier transformation of these tilt angle characteristics. Most of the high-amplitude components were concentrated in low frequencies below 5 Hz. The proposed generator demonstrated a low-frequency vibration compared with the vibration characteristics generated during the bicycle operation presented in Section 2.1. The bicycle vibration over a wide frequency range could be converted into a vibration in a specific frequency using the proposed generator. The mover hardly swung by the vibration along the z-axis direction; the primary component of swing moment was external vibrations along the x- and y-axis directions.
Acceleration measurement results indicated that irregular vibrations occurred in the moving bicycle. The generator extracted only the vibrations in a specific low-frequency range in the horizontal direction from a wide vibration range. Bicycle vibrations generated a liquid wave of a particular frequency, which made the tilt angle of the mover sine-wave.

3. Swing Characteristics of the Mover

Section 2 indicated that the directions of external vibrations that strongly affect the vibration of the mover are the x-and y-axes. In this section swing characteristics are identified using numerical simulations (i.e., structural finite element method (FEM) analysis) and experimental tests (i.e., horizontal vibrations excited by a linear motor).

3.1. Equation of Motion of the Mover

The generator container is fixed to the external structure. Figure 7 shows the rotational moment that acts on the tilted mover, which assumes that the generator is mounted vertically on the bicycle driving flat ground along the gravity’s direction. Gravity and buoyancy act on the center of gravity and buoyancy of the mover, respectively [34]. When the center of gravity and buoyancy are aligned, the mover has a stable position (Figure 7a). Figure 7b shows the tilted state of the mover due to liquid waves caused by external vibrations. The tilted angle of the mover shifts the position of the centers of gravity and buoyancy. The tilt of the float makes its volume in the water fluctuates, resulting in movement in the float position. The deviation in the line of action between the center of gravity and buoyancy causes a moment of rotation [35]. This deviation exerts a restoring force on the mover and causes the oscillating moment to return to the stable state. The distance between these two points (defined as restoration length Lr) affects the magnitude of the moment [36]. The equation of rotational motion of the mover is Equation (1), which is the same as that of a capsizing ship. J and m represent the moment of inertia and mass of the mover, respectively. Lr denotes the restored length of the mover that floats on the water, which indicates the vertical distance between the center of gravity of the magnetic rocker and center of buoyancy. θ and θ″ denotes the tilt angle and angular acceleration of the mover, respectively. Viscous damping and external acceleration are considered in the rolling motion of large ships [37]. The simplified Equation (1) was used in this study, assuming that the size of the mover is small and these effects can be neglected. The equation related to the rolling motion of the ship can improve the simulated accuracy of the mover’s motion.
J θ = m g L r = T

3.2. Swinging Moment of the Mover

The simulation that uses the SolidWorks software (ver.2018, by Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) reveals the effect of the yoke size attached to the mover on the swing moment. The center of gravity and buoyancy are obtained via mass characteristic analysis using the 3D model of the mover, which clarifies the relationship between the yoke size and restoration length Lr [38]. Figure 4 shows that the yoke is arranged using a 0.6-mm-thick cold-rolled steel plate with mounting angles of θm = 180, 90, 45, and 0°.
Figure 8 shows the relationship between the tilt angle and restoration length. A large tilt angle extends the restoration length, and the action of the oscillating moment is strong. In addition, the larger the mounting angle of the yoke is, the larger is trend of the restoration length even at the same inclination angle.
Figure 9 shows the contour diagram based on Equation (1) on the relationship among yoke mounting angle θm, inclination angle θ, and torque T in the rotational direction. The moment of inertia and mass are derived using SolidWorks software (ver. 2018, by Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corporation) by considering permanent magnets, floats, and yokes [39]. The conditions for structural analysis are listed in Table 1. The magnitude of the tilt angle contributes to torque T in the rotation direction. A large value of yoke mounting angle θm increases torque T in the rotational direction. The size of mounting angle θm affects moment of inertia J and the torque T in the rotation direction. The larger the value of mounting angle θm is, the stronger is the effect of the increase on the torque, which leads to large acceleration. A large swing occurs with the in-crease in the yoke mounting angle under the conditions in this study.

3.3. Resonance Frequency of the Swing of the Mover

Tilt angle θ and restoration length Lr are almost proportional to each other, as shown in Figure 8. The equation of motion i.e., Equation (1), is transformed into Equation (2) using resonant coefficient K g (= mgLr/θ). This equation is formulated in the same form of a spring–mass system equation. Therefore, resonant frequency of the swing fr is expressed by Equation (3). Figure 10 shows the relationship between the yoke mounting angle and resonant frequency. The resonant frequency increases as the mounting angle of the yoke increases because the increase in the restoration length is larger than that in the mass and moment of inertia of the mover. Resonant frequency fr depends on the yoke mounting angle. Further, resonance frequency fr represents the factor that causes the vibration in the wide frequency band of the bicycle to be concentrated in the low-frequency range.
J θ = K g θ
f r = 1 2 π K g J

3.4. Vibration Experiment Using a Linear Motor

This section presents the relationship between the yoke mounting angle and resonance frequency by applying a horizontal vibration to the generator using a linear motor, as shown in Figure 11. The tilt angle of the mover is measured via vibration using a linear servomotor (Linear servo system DT030; Sanyo Denki Co., Ltd., Ueda-city, Japan). Yoke mounting angle θm is set to 0 and 45° according to the floatability of the mover. The experiments in this section are fixed on the lower side to avoid the influence of the field magnet of the linear motor. The container of the generator is completely fixed to a support or a structure forming a rigid body. Therefore, the vibration given to the generator is transmitted to the liquid inside without moving the container itself.
Figure 12 and Figure 13 show the tilt angle characteristics of the mover at mounting angle θm 0 and 45°, respectively. These results are compared with the vibration at frequencies fi = 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 Hz to observe the effect of resonance. The mover keeps tilting at fi = 1.5 and 2.0 Hz, whereas the vibration is small at fi = 1.0 Hz. The movement of the mover stops beyond fi = 2.5 Hz at θm = 0°. The mover continues to stably swing even at fi = 2.5 Hz, whereas the vibration is small at fi = 1.0 and 1.5 Hz. The vibration does not substantially continue at fi = 3.0 Hz, at θm = 45°. The continuation frequency of the vibration in the experimental results tends to be slightly lower than the resonant frequency predicted by the simulation, as presented in Section 3.3. However, a large value of yoke mounting angle θm increases the vibration continuation frequency, which tends to be the same as that in the simulation. As described in Section 3.3, the resonant frequency changes according to the specifications of the mover, this indicates the existence of the vibration continuation frequency.
The external vibration frequency fi close to specific frequencies due to floating structure brings tilt angle changes to a stable sine wave, increasing its amplitude. The factor that makes the vibration in the wide frequency band of the bicycle to concentrate at the low-frequency range is largely influenced by the resonant frequency due to the mover specifications. Adjusting the resonant frequency by setting the mover specifications based on the frequency spectrum of the external vibration is important to increase the swing.

4. Output Voltage Characteristics of the Generator

This section presents the effect of the yoked mover on the increase in the flux linkage using simulation. In addition, the output voltage of the generator due to the bicycle’s motion was measured.

4.1. Relationship between the Yoke and Flux Linkage

The yoke could concentrate the magnetic flux of the permanent magnet and increase the flux linkage to the coil, which led to the increase in the output voltage of the generator. The coil flux linkage was calculated via 3D magnetic field analysis using JMAG-Designer (x64) Ver.19.1 (JSOL Corporation, Japan). The conditions for the magnetic field analysis are listed in Table 2. Tilt angles θ ranged from 0° to 20°. The flux linkage attached to the entire surface of the magnetic pole was compared at θm = 0°, 45°, and 180°.
Figure 14 shows the relationship between tilt angle θ and the number of magnetic fluxes for each yoke mounting angle θm. The amounts of change in the number of flux linkage between 15° and 0° were compared based on the tilt angle characteristics of the bicycle, as shown in Figure 6. The difference in the flux linkage between tilt angles of 15° and 0° was 15.0, 12.4 and 10.5 mWb at θm = 180°, 45° and θm = 0°, respectively. The maximum flux linkage improved to 104.0 mWb at θm = 180°. The coil flux linkage was increased by using a yoke attached to the permanent magnet. The output voltage was obtained using the time derivative of the number of flux linkage. The presence of the yoke also increased the rotational torque as mentioned in Section 3.3, and the change in the number of flux linkage was larger, which was expected to increase the output voltage. However, a large yoke mounting angle increases the mass, which could not float on the liquid. The mounting range of the yoke was determined at 0° and 45°, considering the floating on the liquid.

4.2. Bicycle Motion Experiment

The output voltage was measured at a constant speed (approximately 10 km/h) by attaching a generator to the front basket of the bicycle. The yoke was set at θm = 45° and 0° (without yoke) based on the floating range. Figure 15 shows the output voltage characteristic where the maximum voltage without yoke was 0.8 V and that with yoke was 2.1 V. In addition, the LED at the generator output was intermittently lighted. The power due to the vibration of a liquid is expressed using the wave height, group velocity, and vibration frequency [40]. The mechanical input of this experiment is estimated to be approximately 10 mW. Considering that several mWs are required to light the diode, the vibration energy could be converted into electrical energy. The current and output of the LED were 0.7 mA and 1.3 mW, respectively, considering the coil resistance and the reverse voltage of the LED. Turning on the LED more brighter needs improvement of the generator output. However, the lighting time was only approximately 20% of the total moving time. Increasing the container size and the vibration frequency or inserting a capacitor in the output circuit is effective to keep the LED on longer time. Continuous lighting is difficult because of shorter time on output voltage exceeding LED threshold voltage. Increasing the output voltage amplitude to exceed the LED threshold voltage results in periodic blinking.
The output voltage increased with the attachment of the yoke to the mover within the levitation range. The voltage improvement was due to the effect of the mover swing characteristics described in Section 3 and that of increasing the flux linkage described in Section 4. When driving at a constant speed, pedaling causes the bicycle to vibrate and generate power. Acceleration is expected to have a stronger pedaling effect than that at a constant speed, resulting in a large amount of power generation.

5. Conclusions

This study has proposed a swing-magnet-type generator for energy harvesting applications from vibration. The mover is shaken by external vibration via the liquid in a container, which leads to power generation in the coil. The vibration of a bicycle in a wide frequency band (>10 Hz) is converted into a 2 Hz mover swing using liquid.
The output voltage of the generator depends on the coil flux linkage and tilt angle characteristics of the mover. The tilt angle characteristics, which depend on the mover specifications, are investigated using either simulations or experiments. The mass and moment of inertia depend on the yoke size to increase the connecting flux. The larger the yoke mounting angle is, the larger the restoration length at the same tilt angle. If mounting angle θm of the yoke is large, the rotational torque of the mover increases. Furthermore, the simulation results reveal that the resonant frequency related to the mover swing is 2.5 Hz. Vibration experiments using a linear motor also indicates that a resonant frequency of approximately 2 Hz is observed. The specifications of the mover significantly influence its swing characteristics.
The magnetic-field analysis reveals that the fluctuation in the number of flux linkage with the inclination improves by 18% at yoke mounting angle θm = 45°. The bicycle vibration experiment proves that the output voltage of the generator with a yoke is 2.1 V, which indicate the effect of the yoke. The proposed generator prototype is able to power a LED.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, M.S.; software, T.T.; validation, T.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S. and T.T.; supervision, T.M.; funding acquisition, M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pan, H.; Qi, L.; Zhang, Z.; Yan, J. Kinetic energy harvesting technologies for applications in land transportation: A comprehensive review. Appl. Energy 2001, 57, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Amjadian, M.; Agrawal, A.K.; Nassif, H.H. Development of An Analytical Method for Design of Electromagnetic Energy Harvesters with Planar Magnetic Arrays. Energies 2022, 15, 3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sezer, N.; Koc, M. A comprehensive review on the state-of-the-art of piezoelectric energy harvesting. Nano Energy 2021, 80, 105567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kecik, K.; Kowalczuk, M. Effect of Nonlinear Electromechanical Coupling in Magnetic Levitation Energy Harvester. Energies 2021, 14, 2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xie, L.; Song, W.; Ge, J.; Tang, B.; Zhang, X.; Wu, T.; Ge, Z. Recent progress of organic photovoltaics for indoor energy harvesting. Nano Energy 2021, 82, 105770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. An, X.; Wang, C.; Shao, R.; Sun, S. Advances and prospects of triboelectric nanogenerator for self-powered system. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 2021, 12, 233–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Iqbal, M.; Nauman, M.M.; Khan, F.U.; Abas, P.E.; Cheok, Q.; Iqbal, A.; Aissa, B. Vibration-based piezoelectric, electromagnetic, and hybrid energy harvesters for microsystems applications: A contributed review. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 65–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shaikh, F.K.; Zeadally, S. Energy harvesting in wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 55, 1041–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elahi, H.; Munir, K.; Eugeni, M.; Atek, S.; Gaudenzi, P. Energy Harvesting towards Self-Powered IoT Devices. Energies 2020, 13, 5528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Politi, B.; Foucaran, A.; Camara, N. Low-Cost Sensors for Indoor PV Energy Harvesting Estimation Based on Machine Learning. Energies 2022, 15, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ueno, T. Magnetostrictive vibrational power generator for battery-free IoT application. AIP Adv. 2019, 9, 035018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ichige, R.; Kuriyama, N.; Umino, Y.; Tsukamoto, T.; Suzuki, T. Size optimization of metamaterial structure for elastic layer of a piezoelectric vibration energy harvester. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 318, 112488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vallem, V.; Sargolzaeiaval, Y.; Ozturk, M.; Lai, Y.C.; Dickey, M.D. Energy Harvesting and Storage with Soft and Stretchable Materials. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2004832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bowen, C.R.; Kim, H.A.; Weaver, P.M.; Dunn, S. Piezoelectric and ferroelectric materials and structures for energy harvesting applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 25–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Matiko, J.W.; Grabham, N.J.; Beeby, S.P.; Tudor, M.J. Review of the application of energy harvesting in buildings. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2014, 25, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wei, C.; Jing, X. A comprehensive review on vibration energy harvesting: Modelling and realization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 74, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Choi, J.; Jung, I.; Kang, C.Y. A brief review of sound energy harvesting. Nano Energy 2019, 56, 169–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hosseinkhani, A.; Younesian, D.; Eghbali, P.; Moayedizadeh, A.; Fassih, A. Sound and vibration energy harvesting for railway applications: A review on linear and nonlinear techniques. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 852–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, H.; Jasim, A.; Chen, X. Energy harvesting technologies in roadway and bridge for different applications—A comprehensive review. Appl. Energy 2018, 212, 1083–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, R.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z. A novel regenerative shock absorber with a speed doubling mechanism and its Monte Carlo simulation. J. Sound Vib. 2018, 417, 260–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abdelkareem, M.A.A.; Xu, L.; Ali, M.K.A.; Elagouz, A.; Mi, J.; Guo, S.; Liu, Y.; Zuo, L. Vibration energy harvesting in automotive suspension system: A detailed review. Appl. Energy 2018, 229, 672–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Doria, A.; Marconi, E.; Moro, F. Energy Harvesting from Bicycle Vibrations. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2021, 57, 6417–6425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Prajwal, K.T.; Manickavasagam, K.; Suresh, R. A review on vibration energy harvesting technologies: Analysis and technologies. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, Y.; Qiu, J.; Zhou, S.; Ji, H.; Chen, Y.; Li, S. A piezoelectric spring pendulum oscillator used for multi-directional and ultra-low frequency vibration energy harvesting. Appl. Energy 2018, 231, 600–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Edla, M.; Lim, Y.Y.; Mikio, D.; Padilla, R.V. A Single-Stage Rectifier-Less Boost Converter Circuit for Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Systems. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2022, 37, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Doria, A.; Marconi, E.; Moro, F. Energy Harvesting from Bicycle Vibrations by Means of Tuned Piezoelectric Generators. Electronics 2020, 9, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Bowen, C.R.; Ghosh, S.K.; Mandal, D.; Khanbareh, H.; Arafa, M.; Wan, C. Ferroelectret materials and devices for energy harvesting applications. Nano Energy 2019, 57, 118–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qi, Y.; Liu, G.; Gao, Y.; Bu, T.; Zhang, X.; Xu, C.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, C. Frequency Band Characteristics of a Triboelectric Nanogenerator and Ultra-Wide-Band Vibrational Energy Harvesting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 26084–26092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, Y.; Yeo, J.; Priya, S. Harvesting Energy from the Counterbalancing (Weaving) Movement in Bicycle Riding. Sensors 2012, 12, 10248–10258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bai, Y.; Jantunen, H.; Juuti, J. Energy Harvesting Research: The Road from Single Source to Multisource. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1707271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Chang, Y.N.; Cheng, H.L.; Chan, S.Y.; Huang, L.H. Energy Harvesting Research: Electromagnetic Energy Harvester and Energy Storage System for Bike Lighting Applications. Sens. Mater. 2018, 30, 1341–1347. [Google Scholar]
  32. Puig-Diví, A.; Escalona-Marfil, C.; Padullés-Riu, J.M.; Busquets, A.; Padullés-Chando, X.; Daniel, M.R. Validity and reliability of the Kinovea program in obtaining angles and distances using coordinates in 4 perspectives. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. González, P.F.; Aikaterini, K.; Alicia, C.G.; María, C.T.; Carlos, M.P.J.; Francisco, M.R. Reliability of Kinovea® Software and Agreement with a Three-Dimensional Motion System for Gait Analysis in Healthy Subjects. Sensors 2020, 20, 3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, L.; Whiting, E. Buoyancy Optimization for Computational Fabrication. Eurographics 2016, 35, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ibrahim, R.A.; Grace, I.M. Modeling of Ship Roll Dynamics and Its Coupling with Heave and Pitch. Math. Probl. Eng. 2010, 2010, 934714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kianejad, S.; Enshaei, H.; Duffy, J.; Ansarifard, N. Calculation of ship roll hydrodynamic coefficients in regular beam waves. Ocean. Eng. 2020, 203, 107225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gowthaman, D.; Balagnesan, P.; Rajendran, L. Mathematical Modeling of Roll Motion of Ships: New Approach of Homotopy Perturbation Method. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2019, 8, 2539–2545. [Google Scholar]
  38. Seth, A.; Kuruvilla, J.K.; Sharma, S.; Duttagupta, J.; Jaiswal, A. Design and simulation of 6-DOF cylindrical robotic manipulator using finite element analysis. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 62, 1521–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vardaan, K.; Kumar, P. Design, analysis, and optimization of thresher machine flywheel using Solidworks simulation. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 56, 3651–3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Teixeira, P.R.F.; Davyt, D.P.; Didier, E.; Ramalhais, R. Numerical simulation of an oscillating water column device using a code based on Navier–Stokes equations. Energy 2013, 61, 513–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Acceleration distribution in a moving bicycle (v = 10 km/h). (a) x-axis (moving direction); (b) y-axis; (c) z-axis; (d) Sensor position.
Figure 1. Acceleration distribution in a moving bicycle (v = 10 km/h). (a) x-axis (moving direction); (b) y-axis; (c) z-axis; (d) Sensor position.
Energies 15 04630 g001aEnergies 15 04630 g001b
Figure 2. Frequency component of the bicycle acceleration (v = 10 km/h). (a) x-axis (moving direction); (b) y-axis; (c) z-axis.
Figure 2. Frequency component of the bicycle acceleration (v = 10 km/h). (a) x-axis (moving direction); (b) y-axis; (c) z-axis.
Energies 15 04630 g002
Figure 3. Swing-magnet-type generator. (a) External view; (b) Plan view; (c) Front view.
Figure 3. Swing-magnet-type generator. (a) External view; (b) Plan view; (c) Front view.
Energies 15 04630 g003
Figure 4. Structure of the permanent magnet with a yoke (unit: mm). (a) θm = 0 (deg); (b) θm = 45 (deg); (c) θm = 90 (deg); (d) θm = 360 (deg).
Figure 4. Structure of the permanent magnet with a yoke (unit: mm). (a) θm = 0 (deg); (b) θm = 45 (deg); (c) θm = 90 (deg); (d) θm = 360 (deg).
Energies 15 04630 g004
Figure 5. Measurement of the tilt angle of the mover with Kinovea software ver. 0.9.5 by Joan Charmant.
Figure 5. Measurement of the tilt angle of the mover with Kinovea software ver. 0.9.5 by Joan Charmant.
Energies 15 04630 g005
Figure 6. Experimental setup with the proposed generator on the bicycle. (a) Mounting position; (b) Definition of tilt angle; (c) Tilt angle of mover; (d) Frequency component of tilt angle.
Figure 6. Experimental setup with the proposed generator on the bicycle. (a) Mounting position; (b) Definition of tilt angle; (c) Tilt angle of mover; (d) Frequency component of tilt angle.
Energies 15 04630 g006aEnergies 15 04630 g006b
Figure 7. Force acting on the mover. (a) Balanced state (θ = 0); (b) Tilt state (θ ≠ 0).
Figure 7. Force acting on the mover. (a) Balanced state (θ = 0); (b) Tilt state (θ ≠ 0).
Energies 15 04630 g007
Figure 8. Relationship between the tilt angle and restoration length.
Figure 8. Relationship between the tilt angle and restoration length.
Energies 15 04630 g008
Figure 9. Relationship among the yoke mounting angle, mover tilt angle, and torque.
Figure 9. Relationship among the yoke mounting angle, mover tilt angle, and torque.
Energies 15 04630 g009
Figure 10. Relationship between yoke mounting angle and resonant frequency.
Figure 10. Relationship between yoke mounting angle and resonant frequency.
Energies 15 04630 g010
Figure 11. Vibration experiment using a linear motor.
Figure 11. Vibration experiment using a linear motor.
Energies 15 04630 g011
Figure 12. Vibration-experiment result at θm = 0°. (a) fi = 1.0 Hz; (b) fi = 1.5 Hz; (c) fi = 2.0 Hz; (d) fi = 2.5 Hz; (e) fi = 3.0 Hz.
Figure 12. Vibration-experiment result at θm = 0°. (a) fi = 1.0 Hz; (b) fi = 1.5 Hz; (c) fi = 2.0 Hz; (d) fi = 2.5 Hz; (e) fi = 3.0 Hz.
Energies 15 04630 g012
Figure 13. Vibration-experiment result at θm = 45°. (a) fi = 1.0 Hz; (b) fi = 1.5 Hz; (c) fi = 2.0 Hz; (d) fi = 2.5 Hz; (e) fi = 3.0 Hz.
Figure 13. Vibration-experiment result at θm = 45°. (a) fi = 1.0 Hz; (b) fi = 1.5 Hz; (c) fi = 2.0 Hz; (d) fi = 2.5 Hz; (e) fi = 3.0 Hz.
Energies 15 04630 g013
Figure 14. Effect of the number of flux linkage due to the yoke mounting angle.
Figure 14. Effect of the number of flux linkage due to the yoke mounting angle.
Energies 15 04630 g014
Figure 15. Output voltage of the bicycle motion experiment.
Figure 15. Output voltage of the bicycle motion experiment.
Energies 15 04630 g015
Table 1. Conditions for structural analysis.
Table 1. Conditions for structural analysis.
ItemContents
SoftwareSolidWorks Ver. 2018
Analysis methodMass characteristic calculation
Material densityPermanent magnet (ρ = 7.5 g/cm3), Yoke (ρ = 7.87 g/cm3), Floating (ρ = 0.15 g/cm3), Liquid (ρ = 1 g/cm3)
Table 2. Conditions for magnetic field analysis.
Table 2. Conditions for magnetic field analysis.
ItemContents
SoftwareJMAG-Designer (x64) Ver. 19.1
Analysis methodThree-dimensional magnetic field transient response analysis (FEM)
Mesh sizeMover: 0.5 mm, Coil: 0.5 mm, Air: Auto
Time interval4 ms
Step number21
MaterialPermanent magnet: (Arnold: N35), Yoke: (JSOL: SPCC), Air: (μr = 1)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sato, M.; Takemura, T.; Mizuno, T. Voltage Improvement of a Swing-Magnet-Type Generator for Harvesting Bicycle Vibrations. Energies 2022, 15, 4630. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134630

AMA Style

Sato M, Takemura T, Mizuno T. Voltage Improvement of a Swing-Magnet-Type Generator for Harvesting Bicycle Vibrations. Energies. 2022; 15(13):4630. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134630

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sato, Mitsuhide, Takuto Takemura, and Tsutomu Mizuno. 2022. "Voltage Improvement of a Swing-Magnet-Type Generator for Harvesting Bicycle Vibrations" Energies 15, no. 13: 4630. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134630

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop