Next Article in Journal
Hotel Adapted to the Requirements of an nZEB Building—Thermal Energy Performance and Assessment of Energy Retrofit Plan
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Tip Clearance on the Cavitation Flow in a Shunt Blade Inducer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simplified Floating Wind Turbine for Real-Time Simulation of Large-Scale Floating Offshore Wind Farms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Output Prediction Model of the 10 MW Floating Offshore Wind Turbine for a Digital Twin

1
Department of Electrical Engineering, Changwon National University, Changwon 51140, Korea
2
Institute of Mechatronics, Changwon National University, Changwon 51140, Korea
3
Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering, Daejeon 34103, Korea
4
Korea Electric Power Corp, Naju 58322, Korea
5
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 20332, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(17), 6329; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176329
Submission received: 2 August 2022 / Revised: 27 August 2022 / Accepted: 29 August 2022 / Published: 30 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Distributed Control of Wind Farm System)

Abstract

:
Predicting the output power of wind generators is essential to improve grid flexibility, which is vulnerable to power supply variability and uncertainty. Digital twins can help predict the output of a wind turbine using a variety of environmental data generated by real-world systems. This paper dealt with the development of a physics-based output prediction model (P-bOPM) for a 10 MW floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) for a digital twin. The wind power generator dealt with in this paper was modeled considering the NREL 5 MW standard wind turbine with a semi-submersible structure. A P-bOPM of a 10 MW FOWT for a digital twin was designed and simulated using ANSYS Twin Builder. By connecting the P-bOPM developed for the digital twin implementation with an external sensor through TCP/IP communication, it was possible to calculate the output of the wind turbine using real-time field data. As a result of evaluating the P-bOPM for various marine environments, it showed good accuracy. The digital twin equipped with the P-bOPM, which accurately reflects the variability of the offshore wind farm and can predict the output in real time, will be a great help in improving the flexibility of the power system in the future.

1. Introduction

According to the statistics of the International Energy Agency (IEA), the share of new and renewable energy consumption is steadily increasing, and wind power accounts for 36% of the total increase. It is growing much faster than other renewable power generations, such as solar power (27%), hydro (22%), and biomass (12%) [1,2]. In particular, there is an increasing proportion of offshore wind turbines that have better wind conditions and can mitigate problems such as noise pollution during operation. However, offshore wind turbines are exposed to harsher weather conditions than onshore due to sea salinity and strong winds [3,4,5]. With the recent rapid increase in variable renewable electricity (VRE), there are growing concerns about the deterioration of the flexibility of the electric power system [6]. Grid flexibility is the ability of a system to manage fluctuations and uncertainties in electricity supply and demand stably. The VRE will play an essential role in future energy systems, but integrating large-scale VREs into energy systems requires additional flexibility enhancement [7,8]. In order to respond cost-effectively to the spread of the VRE, it is necessary to develop an accurate prediction method for renewable energy generation along with strategies such as introducing energy storage systems and sector-coupling technologies [9].
In general, forecasted weather environment data can be used to predict the output of a wind turbine in advance. However, because offshore wind turbines are exposed to very variable weather conditions, such as rapid wind speed fluctuations and strong winds, tropical heat, hail, and snow, the current environment may differ from the predicted data. Furthermore, unlike stationary wind turbines that only consider wind data, the output of floating offshore wind power is immediately affected by waves, so the height and period of waves must also be considered. In the case of marine environment data, it is more accurate to predict the weather data one hour ago than one month ago, and it is more accurate to predict the weather data one minute ago. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a real-time prediction method that can effectively predict output using data predicted at a closer time. The output prediction of offshore wind turbines requires high-speed calculation time and accuracy. However, the existing simulation tools take a long calculation time and are difficult to calculate close to reality in consideration of the dynamics and control values of the wind turbine [10,11]. In particular, floating offshore wind turbines (FOWT) are exposed to harsher weather fluctuations than stationary ones, and the output of FOWT is affected by the complex dynamics related to moorings, floats, towers, and nacelles. For the optimization of these complex structures, a digital twin system can be an effective alternative.
A digital twin is a virtual model that accurately reflects a physical object. Digital twin utilizes IoT communication, AI-based machine learning, and real-time analytic software to implement virtual models to analyze the state of real systems and diagnose causality. In addition, the virtual models can predict outcomes by applying various input parameters that will occur in real systems in the near future [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. In recent years, digital twins have been studied as an alternative and new method for predicting the output of wind turbines [20,21]. Recent studies on the digital twin technology of wind turbines contributed to the improvement of operational conditions by developing fault diagnosis, condition monitoring, and residual life prediction techniques for offshore fixed and floating wind turbines based on data collected from SCADA devices [22,23,24]. Among them, Fahim, M. et al. [24] used machine learning and SCADA data to develop a digital twin-based model capable of generator output prediction and real-time condition monitoring. When predicting the output of a wind turbine based on machine learning, once the model is trained, it is stable in prediction and inference. However, this modeling method has several drawbacks. Developing models with machine learning is quite tricky without long-term measured SCADA data. In addition, when the capacity, size, and controller of the wind turbine are changed, it is difficult to modify and verify the system [13]. Therefore, there is a need for a physics-based digital twin that can predict the output without the historical and SCADA data of the wind turbine. If a physics-based model is used, the digital twin can be developed without SCADA data.
Once a physics-based model is created for the digital twin, it is easy to analyze and validate a variety of input data and compute complex systems such as wind turbines in near real-time as a reduced order model (ROM). The ROM system uses the correlation of input and output data to simplify various models in full 3D simulations, system simulations, and characteristics of historical data and is effective in implementing them as close to real-time as possible. The mechanism of ROM is similar to that of artificial neural networks, but it is more advantageous to analyze the correlation between input and output within an operational wind speed range [25]. It is possible to calculate the output of a wind turbine using real-time field data through an IoT sensor connected to a physics-based model with ROM or to predict the output of a generator using weather forecast data.
This paper is the first attempt to implement and evaluate a physics-based output prediction model (P-bOPM) for digital twin construction on a 10 MW FOWT. A P-bOPM of 10 MW was implemented, and its performance was confirmed through a comparative evaluation of the reduced model test results and the developed digital twin system. The P-bOPM for a digital twin was designed considering the geographical characteristic of Korea and simulated using ANSYS Twin Builder. The wind turbine was scaled by considering the DTU 10 MW and the national renewable energy laboratory (NREL) 5 MW standard wind turbine equipped with a semi-submersible type platform for the marine environment of Korea. The average wind speed of the site was 8.5 m/s, and the rated wind speed of the wind turbine was 11.3 m/s. The blade pitch and nacelle yaw control systems of the 10 MW FOWT were designed taking into account the operating characteristics of the wind turbine simulator developed by NREL called the fatigue, aerodynamics, structures, and turbulence code (FAST). Since the motion of the floater in the offshore wind turbine continuously changes the output power and the control value, the six degrees of freedom (6-dof) of the FOWT were implemented using the ROM for real-time status updating. Through the FAST simulation, the correlation of the 6-dof of floater in various marine environments was analyzed and applied to learning the ROM system. The wind speed and sea level were used as input data, and 6-dof was generated as output data for the ROM system. In the equation of the output power of 10 MW FOWT, the wind speed was replaced by the effective wind speed determined by the motion equation of the 6-dof. In the P-bOPM proposed in this paper, the output power was predicted by calculating the effective wind speed reflecting the dynamic ROM system. Additionally, for verification of the P-bOPM of the 10 MW FOWT, the reduced model test was conducted by the Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering (KRISO). As a result, the testing of the 1/35 reduced model was performed with a variable marine environment and showed good accuracy with the P-bOPM of the 10 MW FOWT. The error occurred in the output power due to the error of the developed ROM system for the real-time prediction of 6-dof, and the accuracy was 92% when comparing the result of the reduced model test and the P-bOPM for the digital twin. Through this, the accuracy and reliability of the P-bOPM were confirmed. The digital twin integrated with P-dOPM, considering the offshore wind farm’s variability, can greatly help improve the power system’s flexibility.

2. Description and Modeling of a 10 MW FOWT

2.1. Description of a 10 MW FOWT

The weight of the FOWT has a significant influence on the dynamic characteristics of the floater and the effective wind speed of the turbine. The wind turbine covered in this paper was scaled by considering the DTU 10 MW and the NREL 5 MW standard wind turbine equipped with a semi-submersible type platform taken into account in the Korean offshore environment. The mass of the FOWT was calculated by referring to the 10 MW wind turbine of the IEA fixed offshore wind turbine [26]. According to the rated power, wind speed, and driven type, the weight of the wind turbine was calculated using the scaling method from NREL [27]. The ratio of scaling up of the rotor was 1.414 compared to the 5 MW NREL wind turbine. The blade lengths of the 5 MW and 10 MW wind turbines were 63 m and 89.1 m, respectively. The distances of the rotor axis to the blade root of the 5 MW and 10 MW wind turbines were 1.5 m and 2.12 m, respectively. The height of the hub takes into account 50 years of extreme waves and safety margins. The height of the 50-year extreme wave was 34.38 m in the marine environment considering the installation site in Korea. The calculated height of the hub was 119.0 m. In Table 1, the dimensions and weights of the 10 MW FOWT are shown. The floater was designed based on the OC4 semi-submersible type [28], and the scale-up ratio was calculated using the upper structure’s weight ratio.

2.2. Design Parameters of a 10 MW FOWT

In Table 2, the specifications of the 10 MW FOWT are shown. The advantages of the direct-driven type wind generator can be removing the gearbox and improving the reliability of a turbine, as well as reducing the maintenance and repair costs. Therefore, the direct-driven permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) was used for the 10 MW FOWT in this paper. The 10 MW FOWT was modeled using ANSYS Twin Builder. Considering the offshore environment of Korea, when the rated wind speed of 11.3 m/s was applied, the rotor speed, the tip speed ratio ( λ ), and the maximum power coefficient ( C p ) of the turbine were designed at 9.6 rpm, 7.92, and 0.48, respectively. The configuration of the 10 MW FOWT is illustrated in Figure 1.
The detailed model of the wind turbine includes the mechanical components of the wind power system and the back-to-back (B2B) converter. The B2B converter is composed of the DC-link capacitor, grid-side converter, and generator-side converter. The grid-side converter was used to maintain the DC-link voltage and to control the active power given to the grid. The generator-side converter was used to control the power coefficient for maximum power point tracking (MPPT). The frequency of the wind generator was selected at 20 Hz, considering the operating range of the conventional inverter, the number of poles, and the rated rotational speed of the wind turbine.
The following equations were applied to the wind turbine system (1)–(5):
P = 0.5 ρ π R 2 V 3 C p λ , β ,
λ = w R / v ,
C p λ , β = c 1 c 2 λ i c 3 β c 4 β c 5 c 6 e c 7 λ i ,
1 λ i = 1 λ c 8 β 0.008 β 3 + 1 ,
J d ω d t = T m T e
where P is the output power of the wind turbine (W), ρ is the air density (kg/m3), R is the rotor radius (m), λ is the tip speed ratio, λ i is the optimal tip speed ratio, β is the blade pitch angle of the turbine blade (°), C p λ , β is the power coefficient of the wind turbine, J is the inertia of the wind turbine, ω is the angular speed of the rotor (rad/s), Tm is the mechanical torque, and Te is the electrical torque. In Table 3, the constants of the power coefficient are shown.
Figure 2 shows the characteristics of power and control of the 10 MW FOWT system studied in this paper. Figure 2a shows the peak power extraction curves of a wind turbine as a function of the rotational speed at different absolute wind speeds. The generator side converter was operated to control the MPPT according to the rotation speed variance caused by the torque mismatch between the turbine and the generator load. Figure 2b shows the power coefficient curves with blade angle variation. The C p for the modeled wind turbine is 0.48. The variation in the blade angle is expressed by Equations (3) and (4). The blade pitch control value at a fixed wind speed was checked for modeling the same control value as the blade pitch control of the FAST simulator. In Table 4, the blade pitch angle values according to the wind speed are shown.

2.3. Effective Wind Speed and 6-Dof in the 10 MW FOWT

Unlike the conventional fixed wind turbine, the total FOWT output power is affected by not only wind conditions but also ocean waves. The offshore wind turbines, including floating platforms, freely move in three-dimensional space, which is referred to as 6-dof. A rigid body of an offshore wind turbine freely changes position in three perpendicular axes with surge and roll motion in the normal axis, heave, and yaw motion in the transverse axis, and sway and pitch motion in the longitudinal axis. The coordinate system that describes the wind turbine movements is depicted in Figure 3. The x-axis is aligned with the water surface, and its direction is the same as the wind direction. The z-axis points upward. The y-axis is perpendicular to the x-axis and z-axis, as shown in Figure 3. The origin is placed in the static equilibrium position. As FOWT is free to change position in 6-dof, the use of full 6-dof could increase the complexity of the turbine modeling, which would pose a significant impact on the computational burden. Thus, the 6-dof representation of FOWT is reduced to 4-dof, which has the most significant impacts on the total output power, which are surge, heave, pitch, and yaw. The effective wind speed at the nacelle is different from the absolute wind velocity, as given by Equations (6)–(8).
V e = V Δ V ,
V = V 0 ξ h e a v e h T 0.143 · cos ξ y a w ,
Δ V = d ξ s u r g e + h T t a n ξ p i t c h d t ,
where V e is the effective wind speed, V 0 is the absolute wind speed at the rotor hub, Δ V is the variation in wind speed at the rotor hub due to the structure movement, h T is the turbine hub height, ξ s u r g e is dynamic response of the surge, ξ h e a v e is dynamic response of the heave, ξ p i t c h is dynamic response of the pitch, and ξ y a w is the dynamic response of the yaw.

3. Development of a P-bOPM of a 10 MW FOWT

3.1. Configuration of the P-bOPM

Figure 4 shows the P-bOPM configuration of the 10 MW FOWT model. The P-bOPM uses external marine environment data such as wind and waves as input. In the ROM, the 4-dof of the floating body is calculated in real time by inputting the marine environmental data and the blade pitch angle of the wind turbine as inputs. The wind turbine’s output is calculated using the equation of the relative wind speed calculated at 4-dof and the actual wind speed measured on an anemoscope. Effective wind speed was calculated using Equation (6), and output values such as power, blade pitch angle, rotational speed, torque, voltage, and current of the wind power generator were simulated using Figure 1 and Equation (1). The ROM was used for real-time calculation of 4-dof, and the ROM learning was performed under various marine environments using the correlation between the 4-dof of floater and the environment.

3.2. Design and Performance Verification of the ROM

In this paper, the physical structure motion of the 10 MW FOWT was modeled with ROM for implementing the 4-dof. The ROM is an effective scheme that reduces the computational complexity and storage requirements of computer models while maintaining expected fidelity within acceptable error limits. Figure 5 shows the design and implementation procedures of the FAST simulation-based ROM presented in this paper.
Specifically, it consists of the following processes. (1) Input data (wind speed and sea sur-face level) were selected for the 4-dof calculation of the floater. (2) Simulation steps (5, 7, 10, 11.3, 13, 17, 22 and 25 m/s) for learning the ROM system were determined. If the simula-tion results for all cases under which the ROM is operated are used for learning, the accu-racy of the ROM system will increase, but simulation considering all states is practically difficult. Therefore, the simulation was performed by selecting the range of input variable values that the designed 10 MW FOWT can face and dividing it into several steps. (3) The 4-dof was calculated with the mooring and floating body dynamics using the FAST sim-ulator for each simulation step. The 4-dof results according to wind speed and sea level input data were saved for later ROM learning. (4) The ROM system was learned using the simulation results, and the input data for learning consisted of wind speed, sea level, surge, heave, pitch, and yaw. The ROM system was learned by Dynamic ROM Builder [29] of ANSYS Twin Builder and can be developed simply by setting input and output data and error rate for learning. (5) As a result of verifying the ROM using field data, it was con-firmed that the output for variable input data can be calculated within 1 s. Therefore, the ROM can be used for a real-time output prediction, and this is the very reason why the ROM is used in this paper.

3.3. Prediction of the 4-dof for the 10 MW FOWT Using the ROM System

The P-bOPM of the 10 MW FOWT for the digital twin is operated using the real-time or predicted data of the offshore environment to compare and diagnose the condition. The effective wind speed of the wind turbine according to the offshore environment and motion of the floater is necessary rather than calculating the output power of the FOWT only with the simplified wind speed data. Since the expression of 4-dof consists of a complex matrix function as Equation (9), it is difficult to apply to real-time analysis due to its complex and long computation time.
ξ ω = F ω M + A ω ω 2 + i B + B ω ω + K
where ξ(ω) is the response for the 4-dof, F ω is a vector of excitation forces and moments in the frequency domain, A ω is the hydrodynamic added mass and inertia matrix, B is the hydrodynamic linear damping matrix, B ω is a damping matrix, K is the restoring matrix, F ω is a vector of excitation forces and moments in the frequency domain, M is the structure mass and inertia matrix of whole FOWT systems, and ω is the angular frequency. In this paper, a ROM system was implemented using 4-dof for a real-time status update of floating motion, and its effectiveness was demonstrated. For the ROM learning, the 4-dof calculated by Equation (9) that affects the FOWT output under the conditions of wind speed of 5 m/s~25 m/s and sea level of 2.18 m~12.47 m was simulated using FAST. In Table 5 and Table 6, the 4-dof dynamic characteristics of the 10 MW FOWT according to the wind speed and sea level are given.
The average value of pitch and yaw increases proportionally with wind speed, but after the rated wind speed, the surface area of the blades subjected to wind decreases by blade pitch control, so it is inversely proportional. The mean value of the surge is affected by the wind speed, the amplitude of the sea level, and the surface area of the blades subjected to the wind. The amplitude of the heave is proportionally increased according to the amplitude of the sea surface.
Figure 6 shows the comparison of the simulation results of the FAST and prediction results of the ROM according to the variable offshore environment. As shown in Figure 6, the accuracy of 4-dof was measured to be over 90%. The ROM results of 4-dof show sufficient accuracy compared to the detailed FAST simulation models.

4. Development of an Integrated Digital Twin System of the 10 MW FOWT

4.1. Integrated Digital Twin System of the 10 MW FOWT

In order to build a physical model-based digital twin system, it is necessary to receive data from an external sensor and perform real-time simulations. The data connector in Ansys Twin builder sends the real values from the sensor to the model over the network using TCP/IP communication.
Figure 7 shows the 10 MW FOWT model for real-time simulation by using a data connector and the ROM. The real-time digital simulator (RTDS) plays the role of an environment sensor and transmits signals through TCP/IP communication with the P-dOPM using python code. The wind speed and sea level data transmitted from the data connector to the P-bOPM and the output power and blade pitch control of the 10 MW FOWT are calculated in near real-time. The calculated output power of the wind turbine is saved as one csv file every 10 min, such as SCADA data.

4.2. Reduced Model Test of the 10 MW FOWT

In this paper, a reduced model test was conducted to verify the P-bOPM for a digital twin. The 10 MW FOWT was modeled with a 1/35 scale ratio in KRISO. In Table 7, the specifications of the 10 MW FOWT are shown.
When the floater was in a stable state without waves and wind, the center of gravity (CoG) of the full-scale model and reduced model of the floater was 4.45 m and 0.13 m based on the sea water level. Since the semi-submersible type floater is constructed symmetrically, the transverse metacentric height (GMT) and longitudinal metacentric height (GML) of the floater are the same value. Table 8 shows the comparison results of the reduced model test and the simulation results for the free-decay motion of the 10 MW FOWT, and it can be seen that the errors for surge, heave, and pitch are less than 5%.
Figure 8 shows the flow chart of the model-in-loop simulation for a real-time model test with a FAST simulator. The reduced model test of the 10 MW FOWT was conducted in the water tank at KRISO.
The wind maker implemented the wind speed and direction, and the wave maker generated the waves and currents in the water tank. When the 6-dof occurs in the floater due to wind and waves, the 6-dof motion is captured in the qualisys system on the top of the floater. The qualisys system can perform the 6-dof capture of data in real-time from the movement of the object. The nacelle velocity and effective wind speed were calculated from the qualisys system, and these values were replaced instead of the mooring, platform, tower, and nacelle dynamics in the structure of the FAST simulator. The thrust and output power of the actual 10 MW FOWT system was analyzed with calculated effective wind speed. The thrust of the actual size turbine was converted back into the thrust corresponding to the model in the accelerometer composed of the duct fan at the top of the test model. Through the model-in-the-loop simulation, the results of the motion, output, and thrust of the 10 MW FOWT model were fed back repeatedly.

4.3. Comparison of the Digital Twin System and the Reduced Model Test of the 10 MW FOWT

Figure 9 compares the results of the reduced model test and the P-dOPM results of the digital twin of the 10 MW FOWT with the same offshore environment. The input wind speed was an average value of 11.3 m/s, close to the rating, and the wave height was amplitude between −1.9 m and 1.8 m.
M A P E = 100 n P r e d i c t i o n A c t u a l A c t u a l
The accuracy of the P-bOPM was evaluated using the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), which is one of the methods to evaluate the accuracy of time series data. The results of the P-bOPM on the predicted data and the results of the reduced model test on the actual data were compared. As a result of calculating the MAPE using Equation (10), the error and accuracy were 7.7% and 92.3%, respectively. Although it is difficult to compare the effective wind speed directly between the reduced model test and the P-bOPM, it was confirmed that the error of the output power of the wind turbine was affected by the accuracy of the 4-dof produced from the ROM system. The accuracy of more than 90% was targeted by considering the level of response to the impact of weather conditions and large fluctuations in grid power, and it was confirmed that the results were well matched when the results of the reduced model test and P-bOPM of the 10 MW FOWT.

5. Conclusions

This paper dealt with the development of a P-bOPM of a 10 MW FOWT for a digital twin. The 10 MW wind turbine system was modeled taking into account the offshore environment of Korea, and the volume and weight of the turbine and floater were calculated using the scaling method from NREL. A direct-driven PMSG was modeled for the 10 MW FOWT. In order to confirm the dynamic characteristics of the floater affecting the output power, the 4-dof according to the wind speed and sea level was analyzed using the FAST. Based on these data, the ROM was designed, and it is used to predict the dynamic characteristics of the floater according to the offshore environmental conditions. As a result, the ROM accuracy of the pitch was the lowest at 93.1%, and the ROM accuracy of the yaw was the highest at 98.9%.
The P-bOPM of a 10 MW FOWT for a digital twin was implemented, and its performance was confirmed through a comparative evaluation of the reduced model test results and the developed digital twin system. The RTDS plays the role of an environment sensor and transmits signals through TCP/IP communication with the P-dOPM using python code. The wind speed and sea level data transmitted to the P-bOPM and the output power and blade pitch control of the 10 MW FOWT are calculated in near real-time. Through the model test, the 6-dof motion of the floater was captured and linked with the FAST simulator to analyze the output power and thrust of the wind turbine. The output power of the 10 MW FOWT, considering the effective wind speed by the thrust and the motion of the floater, was calculated close to real-time. The accuracy of the digital twin equipped with P-bOPM of 10 MW FOWT was 92.3%, showing satisfactory results with the target accuracy of 90% or more. The digital twin integrated with P-dOPM, considering the variability of the offshore wind farm, can be of great help in improving the flexibility of the power system.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, C.K. and M.P.; software, C.K. and J.-H.C.; validation, C.K., H.-J.S., and K.-H.K.; investigation, M.-C.D., H.-J.S., and J.-H.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.K.; supervision, M.P., I.-K.Y., and L.G.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Changwon National University in 2021~2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. IRENA. Query Tool, Renewable Electricity Capacity and Generation Statistics. 2018. Available online: https://www.irena.org/Statistics/View-Data-by-Topic/Capacity-and-Generation/Query-Tool (accessed on 23 September 2021).
  2. Rubanenko, O.; Miroshnyk, O.; Shevchenko, S.; Yanovych, V.; Danylchenko, D.; Rubanenko, O. Distribution of Wind Power Generation Dependently of Meteorological Factors. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE KhPI Week on Advanced Technology (KhPIWeek), Kharkiv, Ukraine, 5–10 October 2020; pp. 472–477. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kang, J.; Sun, L.; Soares, C.G. Fault Tree Analysis of floating offshore wind turbines. Renew. Energy 2019, 133, 1455–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ribrant, J.; Bertling, L.M. Survey of failures in wind power systems with focus on Swedish wind power plants during 1997–2005. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2007, 22, 167–173. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gundebommu, L.; Hunko, I.; Rubanenko, O.; Kuchanskyy, V. Assessment of the Power Quality in Electric Networks with Wind Power Plants. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Energy Smart Systems (ESS), Kyiv, Ukraine, 12–14 May 2020; pp. 190–194. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lund, P.D.; Lindgren, J.; Mikkola, J.; Salpakari, J. Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 45, 785–807. [Google Scholar]
  7. Denholm, P.; Hand, M. Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 1817–1830. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhou, E.; Cole, W.; Frew, B. Valuing variable renewable energy for peak demand requirements. Energy 2018, 165, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, J.H.; Kim, H.H.; Yoo, S.H. Social acceptance toward constructing a combined heat and power plant near people’s dwellings in South Korea. Energy 2022, 244, 123175. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nikander, A. Development and Testing of New Equipment for Faulty Phase Earthing by Applying RTDS. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2017, 32, 1295–1302. [Google Scholar]
  11. Shao, H.; Cai, X.; Cao, Y.; Ma, T. Digital Mirroring System for DFIG Wind Turbine Generator with Parallel Converters. In Proceedings of the 2020 12th IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), Nanjing, China, 20–23 September 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pargmann, H.; Euhausen, D.; Faber, R. Applied Augmented Reality as an integration approach for ERP- and CAX-systems in manufacturing and operating processes for wind farms. In LNBIP Post-Proceedings of ERP Future Conference 2017; Springer Publishing: Innsbruck, Austria, 2017; in press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rasheed, A.; San, O.; Kvamsdal, T. Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers From a Modeling Perspective. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 21980–22012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sivalingam, K.; Sepulveda, M.; Spring, M.; Davies, P. A Review and Methodology Development for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Offshore Fixed and Floating Wind turbine Power Converter with Digital Twin Technology Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Green Energy and Applications (ICGEA), Singapore, 24–26 March 2018; pp. 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zeitouni, M.J.; Parvaresh, A.; Abrazeh, S.; Mohseni, S.-R.; Gheisarnejad, M.; Khooban, M.-H. Digital Twins-Assisted Design of Next-Generation Advanced Controllers for Power Systems and Electronics: Wind Turbine as a Case Study. Inventions 2020, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, J.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Zuo, H.; Cheng, Z. The Development of Digital Twin Technology Review. In Proceedings of the 2020 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Shanghai, China, 6–8 November 2020; pp. 4901–4906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Botín-Sanabria, D.M.; Mihaita, A.-S.; Peimbert-García, R.E.; Ramírez-Moreno, M.A.; Ramírez-Mendoza, R.A.; Lozoya-Santos, J.D.J. Digital Twin Technology Challenges and Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. VanDerHorn, E.; Mahadevan, S. Digital Twin: Generalization, characterization and implementation. Decis. Support Syst. 2021, 145, 113524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Qi, Q.; Tao, F.; Hu, T.; Anwer, N.; Liu, A.; Wei, Y.; Wang, L.; Nee, A. Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Z.; Shahidehpour, M.; Liu, X. Cyber-secure decentralized energy management for IoT-enabled active distribution networks. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2018, 6, 900–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Snijders, R.; Pileggi, P.; Broekhuijsen, J.; Verriet, J.; Wiering, M.; Kok, K. Machine Learning for Digital Twins to Predict Responsiveness of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 8th Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 21 April 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Olatunji, O.O.; Adedeji, P.A.; Madushele, N.; Jen, T.-C. Overview of Digital Twin Technology in Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis and Condition Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 12th International Conference on Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing Technologies (ICMIMT), Cape Town, South Africa, 13–15 May 2021; pp. 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Park, J.; Kim, C.; Dinh, M.-C.; Park, M. Design of a Condition Monitoring System for Wind Turbines. Energies 2022, 15, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fahim, M.; Sharma, V.; Cao, T.-V.; Canberk, B.; Duong, T.Q. Machine Learning-based Digital Twin for Predictive Modeling in Wind Turbines. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 14184–14194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rahman, S.M.; San, O.; Rasheed, A. A Hybrid Approach for Model Order Reduction of Barotropic Quasi-Geostrophic Turbulence. Fluids 2018, 3, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Bortolotti, P.; Tarr’es, H.C.; Dykes, K.; Merz, K.; Sethuraman, L.; Verelst, D.; Zahle, F. IEA Wind TCP Task 37: Systems Engineering in Wind Energy-WP2.1 Reference Wind Turbines; Technical Report; NREL/TP-5000-73492; International Energy Agency (IEA): Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jonkman, J. Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3 (No. NREL/TP-500-47535); National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL): Golden, CO, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  28. Robertson, A.; Jonkman, J.; Masciola, M.; Goupee, A.; Coulling, A.; Luan, C. Definition of the Semisubmersible Floating System for Phase II of OC4; NREL Technical Report; NREL/TP-5000-60601; NREL: Golden, CO, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  29. Available online: https://www.ansys.com/ko-kr/resource-center/webinar/reduced-order-models-roms-for-simulation-democratization-and-digital-twins (accessed on 21 August 2019).
Figure 1. Configuration of the modeled 10 MW FOWT.
Figure 1. Configuration of the modeled 10 MW FOWT.
Energies 15 06329 g001
Figure 2. (a) Maximum power extraction curve of the 10 MW FOWT according to the rotating speed under the different absolute wind speeds; (b) Power coefficient curves with blade angle variation.
Figure 2. (a) Maximum power extraction curve of the 10 MW FOWT according to the rotating speed under the different absolute wind speeds; (b) Power coefficient curves with blade angle variation.
Energies 15 06329 g002
Figure 3. Configuration of the 10 MW FOWT with semi-submersible type platform and coordinate systems.
Figure 3. Configuration of the 10 MW FOWT with semi-submersible type platform and coordinate systems.
Energies 15 06329 g003
Figure 4. Configuration of the P-bOPM of a 10 MW FOWT model.
Figure 4. Configuration of the P-bOPM of a 10 MW FOWT model.
Energies 15 06329 g004
Figure 5. Design and implementation of the ROM with FAST simulation.
Figure 5. Design and implementation of the ROM with FAST simulation.
Energies 15 06329 g005aEnergies 15 06329 g005b
Figure 6. Accuracy and training results of the ROM system for the 4-dof, (a) Input data for prediction of 4-dof, (b) predicted surge, (c) heave, (d) pitch, and (e) yaw.
Figure 6. Accuracy and training results of the ROM system for the 4-dof, (a) Input data for prediction of 4-dof, (b) predicted surge, (c) heave, (d) pitch, and (e) yaw.
Energies 15 06329 g006
Figure 7. The 10 MW FOWT model for real-time simulation by using data connector and RTDS.
Figure 7. The 10 MW FOWT model for real-time simulation by using data connector and RTDS.
Energies 15 06329 g007
Figure 8. Flow chart of the model-in-the-loop simulation for a real-time model test with FAST simulator.
Figure 8. Flow chart of the model-in-the-loop simulation for a real-time model test with FAST simulator.
Energies 15 06329 g008
Figure 9. Comparison of the results of the reduced model test and the P-bOPM of a 10 MW FOWT for digital twin.
Figure 9. Comparison of the results of the reduced model test and the P-bOPM of a 10 MW FOWT for digital twin.
Energies 15 06329 g009
Table 1. Dimensions and weights of the 10 MW FOWT system.
Table 1. Dimensions and weights of the 10 MW FOWT system.
ItemsValue
Rated power10.63 MW
Hub height119 m
Rotor diameter178.3 m
Number of blades3 ea
Single blade mass32.5 ton
Rotor mass198.0 ton
Nacelle mass414.0 ton
Tower mass559.0 ton
Table 2. Specifications of the 10 MW FOWT.
Table 2. Specifications of the 10 MW FOWT.
ItemsValue
Rated power10.63 MW
Type of the generatorPMSG
Rated line-to-line voltage6.6 kV
Rated armature current930 A
Rotating speed at rated wind speed9.6 rpm
Rated torque10.57 MN·m
Number of poles250
Cut-in wind speed5 m/s
Cut-out wind speed25 m/s
Rated wind speed11.3 m/s
Length of rotor blades89.1 m
Inertia 305,147,058   kg · m2
Rated frequency20 Hz
Stator winding resistance6.4 mΩ
d-axis stator inductance1.8 mH
q-axis stator inductance1.8 mH
Power coefficient0.48
Optimal tip speed ratio7.92
Average wind speed of the site of installation8.5 m/s
Table 3. Constants of the power coefficient.
Table 3. Constants of the power coefficient.
Constants of the Power Coefficient C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8
50% or more1.131510.20.0022.913.220.9−0.002
Table 4. Blade pitch angle value according to the wind speed.
Table 4. Blade pitch angle value according to the wind speed.
Wind Speed 11.4 m/s13 m/s15 m/s18 m/s21 m/s25 m/s
Pitch angle1.1°10.4°14.3°17.2°19.3°20.8°
Table 5. FAST simulation results of the surge and heave according to the marine environment.
Table 5. FAST simulation results of the surge and heave according to the marine environment.
EnvironmentSurge [m]Heave [m]
Average Wind Speed [m/s]Amplitude of Sea Surface [m]Average ValueRangeAverage ValueRANGE
52.184.98−0.56~9.58−0.004−0.046~0.033
72.628.26−1.06~15.96−0.010−0.087~0.068
103.4614.67−1.39~27.29−0.028−0.142~0.091
11.33.9315.42−1.49~29.02−0.039−0.191~0.148
134.5313.33−0.57~26.46−0.020−0.266~0.264
176.4511.692.03~20.39−0.008−0.548~0.533
229.5611.85−4.12~26.730.029−1.767~2.049
2512.4712.21−2.03~26.920.041−2.045~2.606
Table 6. FAST simulation results of the pitch and yaw according to the marine environment.
Table 6. FAST simulation results of the pitch and yaw according to the marine environment.
EnvironmentPitch [deg]Yaw [deg]
Average Wind Speed [m/s]Amplitude of Sea Surface [m]Average ValueRangeAverage ValueRange
52.180.810.26~1.60−0.18−2.65~2.16
72.621.450.56~2.94−0.15−3.51~2.75
103.462.710.85~5.250.14−6.49~6.87
11.33.933.050.92~5.860.11−7.61~7.91
134.532.27-0.40~4.01−0.18−4.81~5.27
176.451.66-0.04~3.09−0.31−4.30~4.62
229.561.37-0.13~2.99−0.64−5.09~5.84
2512.471.21-0.60~3.24−0.88−5.42~5.89
Table 7. Comparison of the full-scale model and reduced model of the 10 MW FOWT.
Table 7. Comparison of the full-scale model and reduced model of the 10 MW FOWT.
Parameter Full-Scale Model of the 10 MW FOWT
(1:1)
Reduced Model of the 10 MW FOWT
(1:35)
Model ratio135
Water depth [m]1504.286
Draft [m]15.00.429
Radius center to outer column [m]47.01.34
Radius center bottom plate [m]9.60.27
Displacement [ton]11,277.6630.263
GMT [m]19.250.55
GML [m]19.250.55
CoG (x,y,z) [m] based on free surface(0, 0, 4.45)(0, 0, 0.13)
Table 8. Comparison of the reduced model test and the simulation results of the 10 MW FOWT motion natural period.
Table 8. Comparison of the reduced model test and the simulation results of the 10 MW FOWT motion natural period.
Parameter Reduced Model TestSimulationError [%]
Surge natural period [s]15.42916.1094.2%
Heave natural period [s]2.7872.8060.7%
Pitch natural period [s]3.9263.9550.7%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, C.; Dinh, M.-C.; Sung, H.-J.; Kim, K.-H.; Choi, J.-H.; Graber, L.; Yu, I.-K.; Park, M. Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Output Prediction Model of the 10 MW Floating Offshore Wind Turbine for a Digital Twin. Energies 2022, 15, 6329. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176329

AMA Style

Kim C, Dinh M-C, Sung H-J, Kim K-H, Choi J-H, Graber L, Yu I-K, Park M. Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Output Prediction Model of the 10 MW Floating Offshore Wind Turbine for a Digital Twin. Energies. 2022; 15(17):6329. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176329

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Changhyun, Minh-Chau Dinh, Hae-Jin Sung, Kyong-Hwan Kim, Jeong-Ho Choi, Lukas Graber, In-Keun Yu, and Minwon Park. 2022. "Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Output Prediction Model of the 10 MW Floating Offshore Wind Turbine for a Digital Twin" Energies 15, no. 17: 6329. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176329

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop