Advanced ECMS for Hybrid Electric Heavy-Duty Trucks with Predictive Battery Discharge and Adaptive Operating Strategy under Real Driving Conditions
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
1.The numbering order of the formulas in Section 2.1 is incorrect.Formula 1 should be changed to formula 6ï¼›
2.Why are there two ordinate units in Figure 7ï¼›
3.The layout of formula 20 is inconsistent with other formulasï¼›
4.Figures 9, 10, and 11 with subgraphs are distinguished by subheadings, which are usually placed directly below the subgraphsï¼›
5.In Section 5.3, the results of improving efficiency of three kinds of vehicle mass are analyzed. Here, in order to effectively demonstrate the effectiveness of the method proposed in this paper, several groups of vehicle mass should be takenï¼›
6.In Section 5.3, the results of improving efficiency of three kinds of vehicle mass are analyzed. Here, in order to effectively demonstrate the effectiveness of the method proposed in this paper, several groups of vehicle mass should be taken.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
1. The names of various parts need to be marked in Figure 1 so that readers can understand the powertrain topology.
2. Authors need to explain the meaning of the parameters in all equations in the paper. Equation 5 indicates that the sum of resistance forces is wrong and the authors need to recheck.
3. The equation labels in the paper are confusing and cannot correspond to the text, making it difficult to understand. The author needs to relabel the equations.
4. Why is the immediate discharge of the battery by RB in the SOC trajectory(I) in Figure 9? Why does DP (III) delay recuperation?
5. During the 5 iterations, how the optimal parameter set is obtained, the authors need to show 5 different parameter sets.
6. How is the value of K in Figure 12 obtained? Why is this point the optimumECMS? Why is the value of K not 1.1 in Figure 11?
7. The vehicle mass in Figure 14 is 24000kg, while that in Figure 15 is 32000kg. Why don’t the authors use the same mass of the vehicle to validate the CS-CD operating strategy?
8. How to analyze the three characteristics for the considered time frame of the MAW, the authors needto give a detailed analysis process.
9. In Figure 20, why is the DCR so sensitive to the detection of the driving cycle, and why is there frequent switching between the CD operation strategy and the CS operation strategy?
10. This paper only completes the simulation validation of the proposed EMS strategy, and the author needs to apply the proposed strategy to the actual vehicleexperiments to validate its effectiveness.
It is average.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
I think this paper is fit for the publication of Energies.
Good.
