Next Article in Journal
Power Hardware-in-the-Loop (PHIL): A Review to Advance Smart Inverter-Based Grid-Edge Solutions
Next Article in Special Issue
Nitrogen-Doped Porous Carbon Nanosheets Based on a Schiff Base Reaction for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries Anode
Previous Article in Journal
Electricity Supply Regulations in South America: A Review of Regulatory Aspects
Previous Article in Special Issue
One-Step Construction of Co2P Nanoparticles Encapsulated into N-Doped Porous Carbon Sheets for Efficient Oxygen Evolution Reaction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Progresses on Vanadium Sulfide Cathodes for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries

Shandong Engineering Laboratory for Preparation and Application of High-Performance Carbon-Materials, College of Electromechanical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science & Techonology, Qingdao 266061, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(2), 917; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020917
Submission received: 16 December 2022 / Revised: 7 January 2023 / Accepted: 11 January 2023 / Published: 13 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials for Advanced Energy Storage and Conversion)

Abstract

:
Aqueous zinc-ion batteries are considered one of the promising large-scale energy storage devices of the future because of their high energy density, simple preparation process, efficient and safe discharge process, abundant zinc reserves, and low cost. However, the development of cathode materials with high capacity and stable structure has become one of the key elements to further development of aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Vanadium-based compounds, as one of the cathode materials for aqueous zinc-ion batteries, have various structures and high reversible capacities. Among them, vanadium-based sulfides have higher academic ability, better electrochemical activity, lower ion diffusion potential barrier, and a faster ion diffusion rate. As a result, vanadium-based sulfides have received extensive attention and research. In this review, we summarize the recent progress of vanadium-based sulfides applied in aqueous zinc-ion batteries, highlighting their effective strategies for designing optimized electrochemical performance and the underlying electrochemical mechanisms. Finally, an overview is provided of current vanadium-based sulfides and their prospects, and other perspectives on vanadium-based sulfide cathode materials for aqueous zinc-ion batteries are also discussed.

1. Introduction

As traditional fossil fuels continue to deplete and due to the gradual increase in the greenhouse effect, there are growing concerns about energy scarcity and environmental issues [1,2,3]. It has become an essential strategy for sustainable development to vigorously develop and replace traditional fossil fuels with reliable, clean, renewable energy. However, wind, solar, and tidal energy, which are constrained by natural conditions, have insufficient effective utilization to support their application in energy storage systems on a large scale. Therefore, it is indispensable to develop new energy conversion and storage systems with high efficiency, low cost, stability, and safety [4,5,6]. Lithium-ion batteries are one of the most widely used electrochemical energy storage systems in commercial applications due to their high energy density, long cycle life, and proven preparation processes. They are attempting to be incorporated into a wide range of power grids in the near future. However, lithium-ion batteries are expensive to manufacture due to the limited global resources of lithium metal. In addition, environmental pollution caused by using organic electrolytes seriously hinders their further development and large-scale application [7,8,9].
Therefore, research workers have turned their attention to secondary aqueous metal-ion batteries, which are abundant in reserves and environmentally friendly [10,11]. Among many aqueous metal-ion batteries, aqueous zinc-ion batteries (AZIBs) have received extensive research for their low cost, high safety, simple fabrication process, high theoretical capacity of 820 mAh·g−1 (~5855 mAh·cm−3) of the zinc metal anode, low redox potential of −0.76 V (vs. ~SHE), high stability, etc., all unique advantages that make these batteries widely studied [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. With the development of AZIBs, it has been widely studied that manganese-based compounds, vanadium-based compounds, and Prussian blue analogs can be used as zinc-ion battery cathodes [20]. Manganese-based compounds (MnO2) [21,22,23] and vanadium-based oxides (V2O5) cannot meet the ideal practical requirements due to their unstable crystal structures and poor cycling performance [24], while Prussian blue analogs [Zn3(Fe(CN)6)2] have small capacities (~±50 mAh·g−1) that hinder their practical applications, although their crystal structures are stable [20,25,26,27]. Therefore, developing cathode materials with stable crystal structures and excellent cycling stability is essential to promoting the development of aqueous Zn-ion batteries [28,29,30,31,32].
Based on the variable valence (standard valence states of +2, +3, +4, and +5) and the active nature of the vanadium element, it can carry out multiple electronic transfer redox reactions and thus exhibits a high capacity [25,28,33,34]. Vanadium-based sulfide nanomaterials, due to their unique structure, abundant redox activity, fast ion diffusion kinetics, and low ion diffusion potential, determine them to be a good choice as materials for zinc-ion batteries with aqueous cathodes [35,36,37,38,39]. Figure 1 shows typical types of vanadium-based sulfides and describes the advantages and disadvantages of vanadium-based sulfides for use in aqueous zinc-ion batteries. As the chemical composition and valence of vanadium changes, it allows vanadium atoms to combine with sulfur atoms to exhibit a diverse range of material species, as well as exhibit diverse structures such as layered structure (VS2), chain-like structure (VS4), and tunnel structure (V5S8), which also determine the various properties of vanadium-based sulfides. Currently, the investigation of V-based sulfides is still at a relatively early stage. There are no articles that review and analyze the recent progress of vanadium-based sulfides as AZIB cathodes. In this review, we summarize recent developments in vanadium-based sulfides as cathode materials for AZIBs, highlighting the mechanisms of zinc-ion storage in the materials and effective ways to optimize electrochemical performance. Finally, some reasonable insights into the current challenges and future applications of vanadium-based sulfides are presented, which may shed light on the research and development of new high-performance vanadium-based sulfide cathode materials for AZIBs.

2. VS2 and Its Composites in AZIBs

Two-dimensional layered transition metal disulfides (TMDs) have the structural formula MX2, where M represents transition metal elements, including titanium, vanadium, molybdenum, tungsten, and tantalum, and X represents sulfur group elements, including sulfur, selenium, etc. Based on their unique two-dimensional layered crystal structure and diverse chemical composition, they are not only beneficial as ion transport carriers to accommodate the volume changes during ion insertion but also make these materials have wonderful optoelectronic properties that can be widely used for energy conversion and harvesting [37,40,41,42,43].
VS2, one of the most common types of TMDs, has a typical two-dimensional layered crystal structure composed of an open sandwich structure of S-V-S, with adjacent layers bonded together by weak van der Waals forces with a layer spacing of 5.76 Å. The large layer spacing also facilitates the insertion/withdrawal of monovalent metal ions (Li+~0.69 Å, Na+~1.02 Å) and multivalent metal ions (Zn2+~0.74 Å, Mg2+~1.32 Å), thus enabling fast ion diffusion [44,45]. In addition, in the VS2 crystal structure, each V atom is surrounded by six sulfur atoms and connected by covalent bonds to S atoms, which belong to the hexagonal crystal system. The advantages of VS2, such as good metallic properties, high conductivity (~5.0 × 102 S·m−1), and faster ion diffusion rate than 2D layered graphene, make VS2 widely studied and applied as a novel cathode material [46].
Mai’s team [47] prepared VS2 nanosheets with thicknesses of 50–100 nm by a simple one-step hydrothermal method and used them for the first time as a cathode material for AZIBs (Figure 2a,b). Subsequently, metallic zinc was used as the anode, a weakly acidic salt solution (ZnSO4) as the electrolyte, and glass fibers as the isolator (Figure 2c). In the voltage interval of 0.4–1.0 V, the nanosheets exhibited a high reversible capacity of 190.3 mAh·g−1 at 0.05 A·g−1 at current density. As of 200 cycles with a current density of 0.5 A·g−1, the capacity retention rate was 98.0%, demonstrating that VS2 has long-term cycling stability as a cathode material for AZIBs. As shown in Figure 1d, they investigated the storage mechanism of the Zn/VS2 system during charging and discharging by non-in situ XRD tests. As the discharge process proceeded, the intensity of the characteristic peak located at 15.4° (001) gradually decreased slightly, and its position shifted to the left, which was caused by the interlayer spacing of the insertion of Zn2+ into the crystal plane of (001) being enlarged during the discharge process. Instead, when fully charged, the intensity and position of the characteristic peaks of the (001) crystal plane return to the initial state due to the extraction of Zn2+ during the charging process, as shown by the ex situ XRD results of the structural evolution being fully reversible during the discharge/charging process. In addition, in situ Raman, ex situ SAED, ex situ XPS, and ex situ HRTEM tests also demonstrated the reversibility of the structure evolution, which is consistent with ex situ XRD results. The following is a summary of the electrochemical reaction between Zn/VS2 electrodes.
In the cathode:
VS2 + 0.09Zn2+ + 0.18e ↔ Zn0.09VS2
Zn0.09 VS2 + 0.14Zn2+ + 0.28e ↔ Zn0.23VS2
In the cathode:
Zn2+ + 2e ↔ Zn
However, as a result of structural instability during charging and discharging, VS2 cathode materials have been seriously hindered in their development [37]. The Du team [48] constructed fluffy and porous VS2/VOx cathode materials by in situ electrochemical pretreatment (first charging to 1.8 V) (Figure 2e–i), taking advantage of the chemical instability of VS2 in aqueous electrolytes. Because of the internal electric field of the heterogeneous interface, the high conductivity of VS2, and the high chemical stability of VOx (V6O13/VO2/V2O5), the average working potential of VS2/VOx with a heterogeneous structure is increased by 0.25 V. A high current density of 10.0 A g−1 produces a high capacity of 156 mAh g−1 at voltages between 0.2 and 1.8 V, with a capacity retention rate of 75% at a high current density of 1 A g−1 after 3000 cycles. In addition, Figure 2j illustrates the VS2/VOx shift of the diffraction peak of VS2/V6O13/V2O5 in ex situ XRD, proving the process of Zn2+ de-intercalation.
In addition to in situ electrochemical oxidation, with the in-depth study of VS2, Jiao’s team [49] used glucose as a template to prepare 1T-VS2 nanospheres by a one-step hydrothermal method (Figure 3a,b). It strengthened the layered structure of VS2 by simply modulating the charge cut-off voltage, which allowed a part of Zn2+ to reside in the interlayer as zinc pillars during repeated insertion/extraction. The 1T-VS2 nanospheres with abundant active sites and stable layered structure facilitate the penetration of the aqueous electrolyte and ensure rapid electron/ion transfer, resulting in excellent rate performance and an ultra-long cycle life of the material in AZIBs. These nanospheres demonstrated excellent reversible capacities of 212.9 and 102.1 mAh·g−1 at current densities of 0.1 and 0.5 A·g−1, respectively, in the voltage range of 0.4–0.85 V. At a current density of 2A·g−1 and 2000 cycles, the capacity retention was 86.7%. As shown in Figure 3c,d, the results by ex situ XRD indicate that the shift in the diffraction peak of (001) indicates the existence of an electron/ion reversible insertion/desertion process. When charged to 1.0 V, the (001) diffraction peak completely returns to its original position, compared to 0.85 V, where the (001) diffraction peak is still on the left side of the original position, indicating that some Zn2+ is still present in the interlayer of VS2. The results of ex situ XPS, ex situ HRTEM, and ex situ EDX are consistent with ex situ XRD results (Figure 3e–i). In contrast, in the voltage range of 0.4–1.0 V, the “dead Zn2+” residing in the VS2 nanospheres can completely separate from the layers due to the large charging cutoff voltage. With the charge and discharge cycle, the 1T-VS2 nanospheres are prone to structural collapse. As a result, the electrochemical performance of the material at 1.0 V is decreased compared with that at 0.85 V (Figure 3j).
Binders are generally electrochemically inert substances, and their presence reduces the specific gravity of the active material of cathode materials; developing binder-free cathode materials is a new idea to enhance the specific capacity of batteries [50,51,52,53]. To solve this problem, the composite method of cathode material and carbon-based material can not only enhance the material’s overall conductivity, promote the electrochemical reaction kinetics, and improve the rate performance, but also effectively alleviate the instability of the layered structure of VS2. Wang’s team [54] prepared rose-like nanoflowers composed of VS2 nanosheets by a simple one-step hydrothermal method, and by vacuum filtration after ultrasonication in a DMF solution C-VS2 thin films were prepared (Figure 4a,b). The electrode films prepared by chemical bond integration under binder-free conditions enhance the interaction forces and provide fast electron transfer kinetics. In the voltage interval of 0.3–1.5 V, the composite films exhibited high specific capacities of 205.3 and 135.4 mAh·g−1 and excellent rate performance at the current densities of 0.1 and 10.0 A·g−1, respectively, and at current densities of 0.5 and 5 A·g−1 capacity retention rates of 90% and 72% after 200 and 1500 cycles, respectively. In addition, the high percentage of the active material of the cathode material and the high electrical and mechanical conductivity of the SWCNTs also make the C-VS2 film highly conductive and flexible, so that the soft-pack battery composed of C-VS2 film exhibits stable electrochemical performance under different bending states. When the bending radii of the soft-pack battery are 2.0 cm and 1.0 cm, the discharge capacities of the device are 129.6 mAh·g−1 in the 40th cycle and 127.5 mAh·g−1 in the 61st cycle (Figure 4c,d illustrate that only 2.1 mAh·g−1 of battery discharge capacity was lost following the bending test).

3. VS4 and Its Composites in AZIBs

VS4 was first discovered in the Whinstone mineral, and its crystal structure was elucidated in 1964 and has been widely studied in recent years as an AZIB cathode material with high performance [55,56,57].
The crystal structure of VS4 is a one-dimensional “linear atomic chain” compound consisting of V4+ with two sulfur dimers (S22−)2 coordinated along the c-axis; Figure 5a shows the results [58]. Each VS4 atomic chain is held together by weak van der Waals forces between the bond, and the spacing between the atomic chains is 5.83 Å [59], which is significantly larger than the effective ionic diameter of Zn2+ (0.74 Å) [16]. There are plenty of active sites for Zn2+ storage and diffusion between the open channels between the atomic chains.
However, an electrochemical reaction’s kinetics are affected by the poor electron/ion conductivity of VS4, and this makes electrode materials challenging to meet high-performance requirements [60,61,62]. Wang’s team [63] prepared VS4@rGO nanomaterials with a simple hydrothermal method and used them as high-performance positive electrode materials for AZIBs (Figure 5b). The use of rGO with superior electrical conductivity as the conductive substrate [60,64,65] improves the electrical conductivity of the VS4@rGO composite, enabling the electrode material to maintain a capacity retention rate of 93.3% while providing a high capacity of 180 mAh·g−1 after 200 cycles at a current density of 1 A·g−1. Additionally, the reaction process is accompanied by the formation of Zn3(OH)2V2O7·2H2O and sulfur, per the ex situ XRD data (Figure 5c), and with the reversible shift of the (011) crystal plane also suggests a reversible insertion/extraction reaction mechanism of Zn2+:
2VS4 + 11H2O + 3Zn2+ → Zn3(OH)2V2O7·2H2O + 8S + 16H+ + 10e
VS4 + xZn2+ + 2xe ↔ ZnxVS4
Similarly, Sun’s team [66] used a one-step hydrothermal method to prepare nano-flower-like VS4/CNT cathode materials with a rich mesoporous structure (Figure 5d), which increased the contact area with the electrolyte, shortened the diffusion distance of Zn2+, and improved the electron transport capacity of the cathode. High reversible capacities of 265 and 182 mAh·g−1 were provided at current densities of 0.25 and 7 A·g−1, respectively, and it has a 93% capacity retention rate after 1200 cycles at a current density of 5 A·g−1. As shown in Figure 5e,f, the charge/discharge cycle in the first turn is significantly different from the subsequent charge/discharge cycles, indicating the occurrence of a phase transition in the first turn. Based on ex situ XRD and XPS, the mechanism of the phase change reaction of VS4 during the first cycle and the reversible intercalation of Zn2+ during the subsequent cycles are described (Figure 5g–i). In the first discharge process (1D 1.0~0.2 V), the characteristic peak of VS4 gradually weakened, and the crystalline phase of ZVO (Zn3(OH)2V2O7.2H2O) and monomeric S appeared. During the following charging process, the characteristic peak of ZVO still exists, and the characteristic peak of the resulting monomeric sulfur disappears as it is dissolved in the electrolyte. As shown in Figure 4j, the relevant reaction mechanisms following the phase change are given:
VS4 + 11H2O + 3Zn2+ + 6e → Zn3(OH)2V2O7·2H2O + 4S22− + 8H+ + 4H2
The acidic conditions are as follows:
H2S2 → S + S2− + 2H+
In order to further improve zinc-ion storage capacity, the construction of heterogeneous structures with sufficient interfaces and grain boundaries is a highly promising and effective strategy. Cheng’s team [67] used as a proof of concept the oxidation of VS4 prepared by a one-step hydrothermal method to a VS4/V2O3 heterostructure in a tube furnace after depilatory oxidation in contact with an external source of oxygen. Concomitantly, by comparing with the precursor VS4 and the fully converted product V2O3, the VS4/V2O3 heterostructure has a higher zinc-ion storage capacity, providing a capacity of 163 mAh·g−1 at a current density of 0.1 A g−1 in the voltage range of 0.3–1.2 V, which is much higher than that of VS4 (47 mAh·g−1) and V2O3 (74 mAh·g−1) in the same voltage range.
Similarly, Du’s team [68] again used an in situ electrochemically induced phase transition method (the same method used to prepare VS2/VOx heterostructures) to prepare S/VOx composites by simple in situ electrochemical oxidation using VS4 as a precursor. The initial discharge capacity of 376 mAh·g−1 was provided at a current density of 0.05 A·g−1 in the voltage range of 0.1–1.8 V, and 260 mAh g−1 at a current density of 2 A·g−1, with 100% capacity retention after 2000 cycles, demonstrating the excellent rate performance and ultra-long cycle life of the composites. Combined with ex situ XRD, a reversible insertion and removal of Zn2+ after phase transition has been demonstrated as an energy storage mechanism.

4. Other Vanadium Sulfides and Their Composites in AZIBs

Due to their chemical stability, variety of crystal structures, and high electrical conductivity, intermediate transition metal–sulfur compounds (TMDCs) are frequently utilized as cathode materials in metal-ion battery systems [41]. However, when repeated cycling is performed on layered TMDC materials, the high polarization of zinc ions can result in structural collapse and severe anisotropic diffusion, leading to a weakened zinc-ion intercalation efficiency and reduced electrical resistance [15,38,49,69,70]. These intrinsic shortcomings are a serious impediment to further developing stable, high-rate, layered TMDCs as cathode materials. The solution to these issues lies in designing TMDCs with tunnel-like structures or unique NiAs structures, which is a potentially effective strategy.

4.1. V5S8

Zhu’s team [71] developed a V5S8 cathode material with a tunnel-like structure and applied it to AZIBs for the first time. By a simple calcination method, depletion in an Ar atmosphere caused the dimeric S22− to monomeric S2− transformation in VS4, thus facilitating the phase transition from one-dimensional chained VS4 to tunneled V5S8 (Figure 6a,b). Due to ordered vacancies in a NiAs-type structure, vanadium atoms in V5S8 partially occupy one-fourth of the available S-S octahedral sites between two adjacent VS2 monolayers. This creates multiple ion paths that enable quick and reversible de-embedding of zinc ions while ensuring structural and electrochemical property stability. As a result, the V5S8 cathode material provides a high specific capacity of 240 mAh·g−1 at a current density of 0.1 A·g−1, exhibits an excellent rate performance of 193.8 mAh·g−1 at a current density of 10 A·g−1, and has a capacity retention rate of 94% after 1000 cycles. In addition, as shown in Figure 6c,d, V5S8 exhibits stronger metallic properties, lower hopping energy barriers, and better Zn ion diffusion paths based on density flooding theory calculations (DFT). As shown in Figure 6e–h, sequential and reversible H+, Zn2+ de/intercalation reaction mechanisms are also proposed based on in situ XRD and ex situ XPS characterization:
Cathode:
xZn2+ + 6yH+ + V5S8 + 2(x + 3y) e ↔ H6yZnxV5S8
4y[Zn(H2O)6]2+ + ySO42−yZn4(OH)4SO4·5H2O + 13yH2O + 6yH+
Anode:
(x + 3y)Zn ↔ (x + 3y)Zn2+ + 2(x + 3y) e
4yZn2+ + 24yH2O ↔ 4y[Zn(H2O)6]2+
Overall:
(x + 3y)Zn + yZnSO4 + 11yH2O + V5S8yZn4(OH)6SO4·5H2O + H6yZnxV5S

4.2. V3S4

An essential member of the vanadium sulfide family, as shown in Figure 7a, V3S4, with its unique NiAs type, usually occurs as V0.5VS2 (consisting of a VS2 monomolecular layer and a 0.5V atom linking two adjacent layers. In this structure, due to the intense contact between the V3+ and V4+ cations, the intercalated V atoms (V3+) exhibit metallic conduction along the c-axis direction, which should aid in the transmission of electrons along their c-axis path [72,73,74,75,76,77].
Pan’s team [78] developed a composite cathode material with a NiAs-type structure of V3S4. As shown in Figure 7b,c, the material was first prepared by electrostatic spinning and calcination of a new composite flexible carbon matrix (a novel composite flexible substrate containing acidified halloysite, carbon fibers, and carbon nanotubes) with high electrical conductivity and strong hydrophilicity, followed by a one-step hydrothermal method to obtain nanospherical V3S4 attached to the filamentary new composite flexible carbon matrix, which was applied to flexible AZIBs. The composite cathode material HCC-V3S4 has a high specific capacity of 148 mAh·g−1 after 200 cycles at a current density of 0.5 A·g−1 and a specific capacity of 102 mAh·g−1 after 1000 cycles at a current density of 5 A·g−1 in the voltage range of 0.5–1.5 V. This design of loading nanomaterials onto conductive carbon substrates promotes electron transfer and avoids using conductive agents and binders, thus improving electrochemical properties. The energy storage device’s carbon substrate’s increased surface hydrophilicity also enhances the composite’s electrochemical characteristics. In addition, the energy storage mechanism of the HCC-V3S4 cathode was investigated by a series of non-in situ characterizations, as shown in Figure 7d–h. In addition, the reaction expression is proposed for Zn4SO4(OH)6·5H2O generated during the charging process:
4Zn2+ + 6OH + SO42− + 5H2O ↔ Zn4SO4(OH)6·5H2O

5. Summary and Outlook

AZIBs, as new green and environmentally friendly secondary batteries, are widely studied for their low production cost, high safety, simple preparation process, and environmental friendliness, and are expected to be widely used in areas such as large-scale energy storage and electronic devices. As an extremely promising cathode material for AZIBs, vanadium-based sulfides show great potential for development in AZIBs due to their low development costs, diverse material combinations, rich crystal structures (layer, chain, and tunnel), and valence changes (V2+, V3+, V4+, and V5+). Table 1 summarizes the structure and reaction mechanisms of different types of vanadium sulfides in AZIBs.
In this review, we provide an overview of recent research advances in vanadium-based sulfide and their composites as cathode materials for aqueous zinc-ion batteries and highlight their various design strategies and the structural characteristics and energy storage mechanisms of the materials, providing some insights into the design of new high-performance cathode materials for AZIBs and facilitating the practical application of AZIBs. The main direction of the application of vanadium-based sulfides in AZIBs is their use as cathode materials. Figure 8 and Table 2 summarize the timeline and electrochemical performance of vanadium-based sulfides and their composites as cathode materials for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. In addition, there is a lack of investigation into more directions on ZIBs for vanadium-based sulfides (e.g., electrolytes, separator, anode protection, etc.), which may be a significant direction for future research. Although vanadium-based sulfides have made tremendous progress as positive electrode materials for AZIBs, these materials are currently immature for practical applications, and their further development still faces several challenges, such as typically lower operating voltage, easier dissolution in aqueous electrolytes, easier structural collapse during cycling, and more complex zinc storage mechanisms. Meanwhile, according to the defects of vanadium-based sulfides as AZIBs cathode materials, the following optimization strategies are proposed: (1) acting as pillars by embedding metal ions, etc., which can effectively reinforce the material structure; (2) using carbon materials as the substrate to improve the conductivity of the material; (3) in situ electrochemical activations to build heterogeneous structures, which can promote the rapid intercalation of ions and alleviate the volume expansion during cycling; (4) developing binder-free cathode materials, which can improve the overall conductivity of the material, promote the kinetics of electrochemical reactions, and effectively enhance the multiplier performance. In summary, the development of integrated cathode materials with stable structure, higher ionic/electronic conductivity, abundant active sites, and easy Zn2+ de/intercalation between layers is the key to realizing the wide application of AZIBs.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 22005167 and 21905152), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. ZR2020QB125), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 2021M693256, 2021T140687 and 2022M713249), the Qingdao Postdoctoral Applied Research Project, the Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province of China (ts20190937), and the Youth Innovation Team Project for Talent Introduction and Cultivation in Universities of Shandong Province.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Ao, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, J.; Cai, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Qian, Y. Rechargeable aqueous hybrid ion batteries: Developments and prospects. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 18708–18734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ling, J.; Kunwar, R.; Li, L.; Peng, S.; Misnon, I.I.; Ab Rahim, M.H.; Yang, C.-C.; Jose, R. Self-rechargeable energizers for sustainability. eScience 2022, 2, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, Q.; Liu, R.; He, C.; Xia, C.; Guo, W.; Xu, Z.-L.; Xia, B. Advanced polymer-based electrolytes in zinc–air batteries. eScience 2022, 2, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Larcher, D.; Tarascon, J.M. Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Xi, B.; Chen, W.; Jia, Y.; Feng, J.; Xiong, S. Advances and Perspectives of Cathode Storage Chemistry in Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 9244–9272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Z.; Sun, H.; Wang, X.; Gu, Z.-Y.; Xu, C.; Li, H.; Zhang, G.; He, Y.; Wu, X.-L. Tetrafunctional template-assisted strategy to preciously construct co-doped Sb@C nanofiber with longitudinal tunnels for ultralong-life and high-rate sodium storage. Energy Stor. Mater. 2022, 48, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, Y.; Bremner, S.; Menictas, C.; Kay, M. Battery energy storage system size determination in renewable energy systems: A review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2018, 91, 109–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tian, Y.; Zeng, G.; Rutt, A.; Shi, T.; Kim, H.; Wang, J.; Koettgen, J.; Sun, Y.; Ouyang, B.; Chen, T.; et al. Promises and Challenges of Next-Generation "Beyond Li-ion" Batteries for Electric Vehicles and Grid Decarbonization. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 1623–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Z.; Li, H.; He, Y.; Sun, H.; Xu, C.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, G.; Sun, Z.; Wei, Q.; et al. An integrated strategy based on Schiff base reactions to construct unique two-dimensional nanostructures for intrinsic pseudocapacitive sodium/lithium storage. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, H.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Z.; Xia, M.; Xu, C.; Liu, Y.; Yu, H.; Zhang, L.; Shu, J. Insight into the electrolyte strategies for aqueous zinc ion batteries. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2022, 452, 7517–7556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, M.; Meng, Y.; Li, K.; Ahmad, T.; Chen, N.; Xu, Y.; Sun, J.; Chuai, M.; Zheng, X.; Yuan, Y.; et al. Toward dendrite-free and anti-corrosion Zn anodes by regulating a bismuth-based energizer. eScience 2022, 2, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ruan, P.; Liang, S.; Lu, B.; Fan, H.J.; Zhou, J. Design Strategies for High-Energy-Density Aqueous Zinc Batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2022, 61, e202200598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, H.; Ye, W.; Yang, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Hu, Y. Zn-ion hybrid supercapacitors: Achievements, challenges and future perspectives. Nano Energy 2021, 85, 105942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, F.; Liao, T.; Liu, C.; Peng, H.; Luo, W.; Yang, H.; Yan, C.; Sun, Z. Biomineralization-inspired dendrite-free Zn-electrode for long-term stable aqueous Zn-ion battery. Nano Energy 2022, 103, 107830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Song, M.; Tan, H.; Chao, D.; Fan, H.J. Recent Advances in Zn-Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1802564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fang, G.; Zhou, J.; Pan, A.; Liang, S. Recent Advances in Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2480–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Chen, A.; Sun, J. Promise and challenge of vanadium-based cathodes for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 54, 655–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Z.; Zhou, M.; Qin, L.; Chen, M.; Chen, Z.; Guo, S.; Wang, L.; Fang, G.; Liang, S. Simultaneous regulation of cations and anions in an electrolyte for high-capacity, high-stability aqueous zinc–vanadium batteries. eScience 2022, 2, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Jin, T.; Meng, J.; Jiao, L.; Zhu, M.; Chen, J. Electrospun Thin-Walled CuCo2O4@C Nanotubes as Bifunctional Oxygen Electrocatalysts for Rechargeable Zn-Air Batteries. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 7989–7994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Fu, H. Recent advances in rechargeable Zn-based batteries. J. Power Sources 2021, 493, 229677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hua, F.; Fan, M. Research progress on Mn based oxide as cathode materia for ZIBs. New Chem. Mater. 2021, 49, 1006–3536. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang, B.; Chen, J.; Sun, W.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, K. Challenges and Perspectives for Doping Strategy for Manganese-Based Zinc-ion Battery Cathode. Energies 2022, 15, 4698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chuai, M.; Yang, J.; Wang, M.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xu, Y.; Yin, Y.; Sun, J.; Zheng, X.; Chen, N.; et al. High-performance Zn battery with transition metal ions co-regulated electrolytic MnO2. eScience 2021, 1, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, L.; Zheng, J. Recent advances in cathode materials of rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Mater. Today Adv. 2020, 7, 100078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, S.; Wei, X.; Chen, H.; Lai, G.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Wu, S.; Tang, W.; Lin, Z. A mixed-valent vanadium oxide cathode with ultrahigh rate capability for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 22392–22398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tolstopyatova, E.G.; Kamenskii, M.A.; Kondratiev, V.V. Vanadium Oxide–Conducting Polymers Composite Cathodes for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries: Interfacial Design and Enhancement of Electrochemical Performance. Energies 2022, 15, 8966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. He, P.; Chen, Q.; Yan, M.; Xu, X.; Zhou, L.; Mai, L.; Nan, C.-W. Building better zinc-ion batteries: A materials perspective. Energy Chem. 2019, 1, 100022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liang, Y.; Dong, H.; Aurbach, D.; Yao, Y. Current status and future directions of multivalent metal-ion batteries. Nat. Energy 2020, 5, 646–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Blanc, L.E.; Kundu, D.; Nazar, L.F. Scientific Challenges for the Implementation of Zn-Ion Batteries. Joule 2020, 4, 771–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, J.; Li, Y.; Xie, R.; Li, J.; Tian, Z.; Chai, G.; Zhang, Y.; Lai, F.; He, G.; Liu, C.; et al. Structural engineering of cathodes for improved Zn-ion batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 58, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Du, M.; Miao, Z.; Li, H.; Sang, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, S. Strategies of structural and defect engineering for high-performance rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 19245–19281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tang, B.; Shan, L.; Liang, S.; Zhou, J. Issues and opportunities facing aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 3288–3304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yi, T.-F.; Qiu, L.; Qu, J.-P.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.-H.; Zhu, Y.-R. Towards high-performance cathodes: Design and energy storage mechanism of vanadium oxides-based materials for aqueous Zn-ion batteries. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 446, 214124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, H.; Wang, J.-G.; You, Z.; Wei, C.; Kang, F.; Wei, B. Rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion batteries: Mechanism, design strategies and future perspectives. Mater. Today 2021, 42, 73–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xiaoru, Y.; Yufang, C.; Peitao, X.; Chunman, Z. Review on Oxygen-Free Vanadium-Based Cathodes for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. 2022, 28, 2219004. [Google Scholar]
  36. Xu, X.; Xiong, F.; Meng, J.; Wang, X.; Niu, C.; An, Q.; Mai, L. Vanadium-Based Nanomaterials: A Promising Family for Emerging Metal-Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. 2020, 30, 1904398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, T.; Li, H.; Yuan, J.; Xia, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, A. Recent Advance and Modification Strategies of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides (TMDs) in Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries. Materials 2022, 15, 2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, B. Transition Metal Dichalcogenides for High−Performance Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries. Batteries 2022, 8, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ding, J.; Gao, H.; Ji, D.; Zhao, K.; Wang, S.; Cheng, F. Vanadium-based cathodes for aqueous zinc-ion batteries: From crystal structures, diffusion channels to storage mechanisms. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 5258–5275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yun, Q.; Lu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Tan, C.; Zhang, H. Three-Dimensional Architectures Constructed from Transition-Metal Dichalcogenide Nanomaterials for Electrochemical Energy Storage and Conversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 626–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, W.S.V.; Xiong, T.; Wang, X.; Xue, J. Unraveling MoS2 and Transition Metal Dichalcogenides as Functional Zinc-Ion Battery Cathode: A Perspective. Small Methods 2021, 5, e2000815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hoang Huy, V.P.; Ahn, Y.N.; Hur, J. Recent Advances in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Cathode Materials for Aqueous Rechargeable Multivalent Metal-Ion Batteries. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, X.; Wei, Q.; Li, H.; Sun, J.; Li, H.; He, Y.; Liu, Z. Iron-chalcogenide-based electrode materials for electrochemical energy storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 7517–7556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, Y.; Song, T.-Y.; Chen, L.-N. A review on recent developments of vanadium-based cathode for rechargeable zinc-ion batteries. Tungsten 2021, 3, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.-H.; Gao, Y.; Cao, X.; Zhan, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Chou, S.-L.; Dou, S.-X.; et al. Vanadium-based cathodes for aqueous zinc-ion batteries: Mechanism, design strategies and challenges. Energy Stor. Mater. 2022, 50, 21–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wan, F.; Niu, Z. Design Strategies for Vanadium-based Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 16358–16367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. He, P.; Yan, M.; Zhang, G.; Sun, R.; Chen, L.; An, Q.; Mai, L. Layered VS2 Nanosheet-Based Aqueous Zn Ion Battery Cathode. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1601920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yu, D.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, C.; Chen, G.; Shen, Z.X.; Du, F. Boosting Zn2+ and NH4+ Storage in Aqueous Media via In-Situ Electrochemical Induced VS2/VOx Heterostructures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 31, 2008743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tan, Y.; Li, S.W.; Zhao, X.D.; Wang, Y.; Shen, Q.Y.; Qu, X.H.; Liu, Y.C.; Jiao, L.F. Unexpected Role of the Interlayer "Dead Zn2+" in Strengthening the Nanostructures of VS2 Cathodes for High-Performance Aqueous Zn-Ion Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2104001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jiao, T.; Yang, Q.; Wu, S.; Wang, Z.; Chen, D.; Shen, D.; Liu, B.; Cheng, J.; Li, H.; Ma, L.; et al. Binder-free hierarchical VS2 electrodes for high-performance aqueous Zn ion batteries towards commercial level mass loading. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 16330–16338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Feng, M.; Wang, W.; Hu, Z.; Fan, C.; Zhao, X.; Wang, P.; Li, H.; Yang, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z. Engineering chemical-bonded Ti3C2 MXene@carbon composite films with 3D transportation channels for promoting lithium-ion storage in hybrid capacitors. Sci. China Mater. 2022, 1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, W.; Feng, M.; Hu, E.; Hu, Z.; Fan, C.; Li, H.; Wang, P.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z. Interlayer and intralayer co-modified flexible V2CTX MXene@SWCNT films for high-power Li-ion capacitors. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 22, 2095–4956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, X.; Wang, R.; Zhao, Z.; Bi, S.; Niu, Z. Controllable spatial engineering of flexible all-in-one graphene-based supercapacitors with various architectures. Energy Stor. Mater. 2019, 23, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sun, H.; Yang, L.; Hu, E.; Feng, M.; Fan, C.; Wang, W.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z. Rose-like VS2 Nanosheets Chemically Anchored on Carbon Nanotubes for Flexible Zinc-Ion Batteries with Enhanced Properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 40247–40256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yao, K.; Wu, M.; Chen, D.; Liu, C.; Xu, C.; Yang, D.; Yao, H.; Liu, L.; Zheng, Y.; Rui, X. Vanadium Tetrasulfide for Next-Generation Rechargeable Batteries: Advances and Challenges. Chem. Rec. 2022, 22, e202200117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Allmann, R.; Baumann, I.; Kutoglu, A.; Rösch, H.; Hellner, E. Die Kristallstruktur des Patronits V(S2)2. Naturwissenschaften 1964, 51, 263–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hillebrand, W.F. The Vanadium Sulphide, Patronite, and its Mineral Associates from Minasragra, Peru. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1907, 29, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Zhu, Q.; Xiao, Q.; Zhang, B.; Yan, Z.; Liu, X.; Chen, S.; Ren, Z.; Yu, Y. VS4 with a chain crystal structure used as an intercalation cathode for aqueous Zn-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 10761–10766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, C.; Yi, X.; Chen, R.; Ma, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, G.; Chen, T.; Tie, Z.; et al. Highly Branched VS4 Nanodendrites with 1D Atomic-Chain Structure as a Promising Cathode Material for Long-Cycling Magnesium Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1802563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shen, C.; Li, X.; Li, N.; Xie, K.; Wang, J.G.; Liu, X.; Wei, B. Graphene-Boosted, High-Performance Aqueous Zn-Ion Battery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 25446–25453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ruan, P.; Xu, X.; Feng, J.; Yu, L.; Gao, X.; Shi, W.; Wu, F.; Liu, W.; Zang, X.; Ma, F.; et al. Boosting zinc storage performance via conductive materials. Mater. Res. Bull. 2021, 133, 111077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, T.; Zhang, L.; Hou, Y. MXenes: Synthesis strategies and lithium-sulfur battery applications. eScience 2022, 2, 164–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Qin, H.; Yang, Z.; Chen, L.; Chen, X.; Wang, L. A high-rate aqueous rechargeable zinc ion battery based on the VS4@rGO nanocomposite. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 23757–23765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Niu, Z. Carbon-based materials for lithium-ion capacitors. Mater. Chem. Front. 2019, 3, 1265–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xu, C.; Wei, Q.; Li, M.; You, J.; Song, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, G.; Li, H.; He, Y.; Liu, Z. Ultrafast and simple integration engineering of graphene-based flexible films with extensive tunability and simple trial in lithium-ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 922, 166282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gao, S.; Ju, P.; Liu, Z.; Zhai, L.; Liu, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Dong, C.; Jiang, F.; Sun, J. Electrochemically induced phase transition in a nanoflower vanadium tetrasulfide cathode for high-performance zinc-ion batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 69, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ding, J.; Gao, H.; Liu, W.; Wang, S.; Wu, S.; Fang, S.; Cheng, F. Operando constructing vanadium tetrasulfide-based heterostructures enabled by extrinsic adsorbed oxygen for enhanced zinc ion storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 11433–11441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Deng, L.; Yu, D.; Sun, G.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C.; Tian, R.; Du, F. In-situ electrochemical synthesis of a high-performance S/VOx composite for aqueous zinc ion batteries. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2022, 55, 274001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, X.; Wang, F.; Wang, L.; Li, M.; Wang, Y.; Chen, B.; Zhu, Y.; Fu, L.; Zha, L.; Zhang, L.; et al. An Aqueous Rechargeable Zn//Co3O4 Battery with High Energy Density and Good Cycling Behavior. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 4904–4911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, Y.; Fu, J.; Zhong, C.; Wu, T.; Chen, Z.; Hu, W.; Amine, K.; Lu, J. Recent Advances in Flexible Zinc-Based Rechargeable Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 9, 1802605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Ren, Z.; Sun, Y.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ren, X.; Zhao, Y.; Liang, Z.; Huai, P.; Song, F.; Jiang, Z.; et al. Metallic V5S8 microparticles with tunnel-like structure for high-rate and stable zinc-ion energy storage. Energy Stor. Mater. 2021, 42, 786–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tan, Z.; Liu, S.; Zhang, X.; Wei, J.; Liu, Y.; Hou, L.; Yuan, C. Few-layered V2C MXene derived 3D V3S4 nanocrystal functionalized carbon flakes boosting polysulfide adsorption and catalytic conversion towards Li–S batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 18679–18689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yao, G.; Niu, P.; Li, Z.; Xu, Y.; Wei, L.; Niu, H.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, F.; Chen, Q. Construction of flexible V3S4@CNF films as long-term stable anodes for sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 423, 130229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wu, D.; Zhang, W.; Feng, Y.; Ma, J. Necklace-like carbon nanofibers encapsulating V3S4 microspheres for ultrafast and stable potassium-ion storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 2618–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhong, Y.; Chai, S.; Huang, X.; Zhou, S.; He, Q.; Lu, R.; Su, Q.; Pan, A. Hierarchical 1D/2D V3S4@N, S-Codoped rGO Hybrids as High-Performance Anode Materials for Fast and Stable Lithium-Ion Storage. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 4722–4732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Ma, L.; Li, H.; Xu, X.; Liu, X.; Lu, T.; Pan, L. Insights into the storage mechanism of 3D nanoflower-like V3S4 anode in sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 130936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, Y.; Xiao, M.; Hu, J.; Zhao, G.; Liu, S.; Zhu, F. Composite V3S4@rGO nanowires as a high-performance anode material for lithium-/sodium-ion batteries. Ionics 2021, 27, 5067–5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Liu, S.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, J.; Cai, Z.; Pan, A. Fabrication of an Inexpensive Hydrophilic Bridge on a Carbon Substrate and Loading Vanadium Sulfides for Flexible Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 36676–36684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pu, X.; Song, T.; Tang, L.; Tao, Y.; Cao, T.; Xu, Q.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Xia, Y. Rose-like vanadium disulfide coated by hydrophilic hydroxyvanadium oxide with improved electrochemical performance as cathode material for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2019, 437, 226917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chen, T.; Zhu, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Peng, W.; Zhang, F.; Fan, X. VS2 nanosheets vertically grown on graphene as high-performance cathodes for aqueous zinc-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2020, 477, 228652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yin, B.-S.; Zhang, S.-W.; Xiong, T.; Shi, W.; Ke, K.; Lee, W.S.V.; Xue, J.; Wang, Z.-B. Engineering sulphur vacancy in VS2 as high performing zinc-ion batteries with high cyclic stability. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 15951–15957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, J.; Peng, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, F.; Fan, X. A VS2@N-doped carbon hybrid with strong interfacial interaction for high-performance rechargeable aqueous Zn-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 6308–6315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yang, M.; Wang, Z.; Ben, H.; Zhao, M.; Luo, J.; Chen, D.; Lu, Z.; Wang, L.; Liu, C. Boosting the zinc ion storage capacity and cycling stability of interlayer-expanded vanadium disulfide through in-situ electrochemical oxidation strategy. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 607, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Gao, P.; Pan, Z.; Ru, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, M.; Zhao, X.; Ling, F.C.-C.; Wei, L. Synergetic V2O5·3H2O/Metallic VS2 Nanocomposites Endow a Long Life and High Rate Capability to Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 3319–3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, P.; Wang, A.; Huang, K.J.; Fang, L.; Wu, X. Interlayer-expanded VS2 nanosheet: Fast ion transport, dynamic mechanism and application in Zn2+ and Mg2+/Li+ hybrid batteries systems. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 620, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Samanta, P.; Ghosh, S.; Jang, W.; Yang, C.-M.; Murmu, N.C.; Kuila, T. A Reversible Anodizing Strategy in a Hybrid Electrolyte Zn-Ion Battery through Structural Modification of a Vanadium Sulfide Cathode. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 10656–10667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Types of vanadium-based sulfides and advantages and disadvantages of their application in aqueous zinc-ion batteries.
Figure 1. Types of vanadium-based sulfides and advantages and disadvantages of their application in aqueous zinc-ion batteries.
Energies 16 00917 g001
Figure 2. (a) The XRD of layered VS2 [47]. (b) The SEM of layered VS2 [47]. (c) Schematic illustration of the operation mechanism of Zn/VS2 AZIB [47]. (d) Ex situ XRD patterns of layered VS2 [47]. (e) Electrostatic charging and discharging curves for VS2 [48]. (f) Ex situ XRD patterns of the electrode at different charge states (SOC) [48]. (g) The average potential of VS2 and VS2/VOx under the GCD curve in the second circle [48]. (h,i) The HRTEM images of in situ formed VS2/VOx [48]. (j) Ex situ XRD patterns of VS2/VOx [48].
Figure 2. (a) The XRD of layered VS2 [47]. (b) The SEM of layered VS2 [47]. (c) Schematic illustration of the operation mechanism of Zn/VS2 AZIB [47]. (d) Ex situ XRD patterns of layered VS2 [47]. (e) Electrostatic charging and discharging curves for VS2 [48]. (f) Ex situ XRD patterns of the electrode at different charge states (SOC) [48]. (g) The average potential of VS2 and VS2/VOx under the GCD curve in the second circle [48]. (h,i) The HRTEM images of in situ formed VS2/VOx [48]. (j) Ex situ XRD patterns of VS2/VOx [48].
Energies 16 00917 g002
Figure 3. (a) Diagrammatic representation of the 1T-VS2 growth process [49]. (b) The SEM and TEM images of 1T-VS2 [49]. (c) 1T-VS2 in the voltage range 0.4–1.0 V, GCD at different potential points in the first cycle (The coloured letters A–H in subfigures (ce) indicate the different potential points) [49]. Ex-situ (d) XRD patterns of 1T-VS2, (e) Raman spectra of 1T-VS2, (f) Zn 2p, and (g) V 2p XPS spectra of 1T-VS2. (h) HRTEM images and (i) STEM element mapping images of the 1T-VS2 [49]. (j) Diagram of the zinc-ion storage mechanism of 1T-VS2 at different cut-off voltages (0.85 and 1.0 V) [49].
Figure 3. (a) Diagrammatic representation of the 1T-VS2 growth process [49]. (b) The SEM and TEM images of 1T-VS2 [49]. (c) 1T-VS2 in the voltage range 0.4–1.0 V, GCD at different potential points in the first cycle (The coloured letters A–H in subfigures (ce) indicate the different potential points) [49]. Ex-situ (d) XRD patterns of 1T-VS2, (e) Raman spectra of 1T-VS2, (f) Zn 2p, and (g) V 2p XPS spectra of 1T-VS2. (h) HRTEM images and (i) STEM element mapping images of the 1T-VS2 [49]. (j) Diagram of the zinc-ion storage mechanism of 1T-VS2 at different cut-off voltages (0.85 and 1.0 V) [49].
Energies 16 00917 g003
Figure 4. (a) Optical images of the flexible C-VS2 film [54]. (b) Diagram of C-VS2 composite achieving C-V chemical bond independence [54]. (c) Soft-packaged Zn//C-VS2 battery schematic diagram [54]. (d) Cycle performance of flexible packaging battery in different bending states (0.5 A g−1) and LED screen lighting in different bending states [54].
Figure 4. (a) Optical images of the flexible C-VS2 film [54]. (b) Diagram of C-VS2 composite achieving C-V chemical bond independence [54]. (c) Soft-packaged Zn//C-VS2 battery schematic diagram [54]. (d) Cycle performance of flexible packaging battery in different bending states (0.5 A g−1) and LED screen lighting in different bending states [54].
Energies 16 00917 g004
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of the VS4 [58]. (b) The SEM image of VS4@rGO [63]. (c) Ex situ XRD patterns of VS4@rGO in the first charge/discharge cycle [63]. (d) The SEM images of VS4/CNTs. (e) CV curves of VS4/CNTs electrode at a scan rate of 0.1 mV·s−1 [66]. (f) Discharge–charge profiles of VS4/CNTs electrode at 0.25 A·g−1 [66]. Ex situ (g) XRD patterns of VS4/CNTs, (h) enlarged area of ZVO (001) planes, and (i) V 2p XPS spectra of VS4/CNT [66]. (j) Schematic representation of the reaction mechanism of the VS4/CNT cathode during cycling [66].
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of the VS4 [58]. (b) The SEM image of VS4@rGO [63]. (c) Ex situ XRD patterns of VS4@rGO in the first charge/discharge cycle [63]. (d) The SEM images of VS4/CNTs. (e) CV curves of VS4/CNTs electrode at a scan rate of 0.1 mV·s−1 [66]. (f) Discharge–charge profiles of VS4/CNTs electrode at 0.25 A·g−1 [66]. Ex situ (g) XRD patterns of VS4/CNTs, (h) enlarged area of ZVO (001) planes, and (i) V 2p XPS spectra of VS4/CNT [66]. (j) Schematic representation of the reaction mechanism of the VS4/CNT cathode during cycling [66].
Energies 16 00917 g005
Figure 6. (a) Diagram of the preparation process of V5S8 [71]. (b) The SEM images of V5S8 [71]. (c) Schematic diagram of the diffusion pathway of Zn atoms in the V5S8 anode (path I and II) [71]. (d) The corresponding diffusion energy barrier curves for different paths in V5S8 [71]. (e) In situ SXRD patterns of the V5S8 (006) characteristic peak and V5S8 (001) characteristic peak [71]. (f) Changes in the interlayer spacing of the crystalline surfaces associated with V5S8 during discharge/charging and the corresponding peak area of the side reaction product Zn4SO4(OH)6·5H2O [71]. (g) Discharge/charging curves in the voltage range of 0.2–1.6 V during the in situ observation [71]. (h) Ex situ XPS spectra of Zn 2p at selected states [71].
Figure 6. (a) Diagram of the preparation process of V5S8 [71]. (b) The SEM images of V5S8 [71]. (c) Schematic diagram of the diffusion pathway of Zn atoms in the V5S8 anode (path I and II) [71]. (d) The corresponding diffusion energy barrier curves for different paths in V5S8 [71]. (e) In situ SXRD patterns of the V5S8 (006) characteristic peak and V5S8 (001) characteristic peak [71]. (f) Changes in the interlayer spacing of the crystalline surfaces associated with V5S8 during discharge/charging and the corresponding peak area of the side reaction product Zn4SO4(OH)6·5H2O [71]. (g) Discharge/charging curves in the voltage range of 0.2–1.6 V during the in situ observation [71]. (h) Ex situ XPS spectra of Zn 2p at selected states [71].
Energies 16 00917 g006
Figure 7. (a) Schematic diagram of the V3S4 [78]. (b) The SEM images of the HCC and (c) the HCC-V3S4 [78]. Ex situ (d,e) XRD patterns of HCC-V3S4 and (f) XPS spectra of HCC-V3S4 [78]. (g) TEM and HRTEM diagrams of the HCC-V3S4 electrodes after discharge to 0.5 V and (h) charging to 1.5 V [78].
Figure 7. (a) Schematic diagram of the V3S4 [78]. (b) The SEM images of the HCC and (c) the HCC-V3S4 [78]. Ex situ (d,e) XRD patterns of HCC-V3S4 and (f) XPS spectra of HCC-V3S4 [78]. (g) TEM and HRTEM diagrams of the HCC-V3S4 electrodes after discharge to 0.5 V and (h) charging to 1.5 V [78].
Energies 16 00917 g007
Figure 8. Timeline for the development of vanadium-based sulfides as cathode materials for AZIBs.
Figure 8. Timeline for the development of vanadium-based sulfides as cathode materials for AZIBs.
Energies 16 00917 g008
Table 1. Summary of the structure and mechanism of vanadium sulfide cathode materials in AZIBs.
Table 1. Summary of the structure and mechanism of vanadium sulfide cathode materials in AZIBs.
Types of Vanadium SulfidesCrystal Structure ModelsInterplanar Crystal Spacing (Å)Reaction MechanismsRef.
VS2Energies 16 00917 i0015.76Interlayer mechanism[50]
VS4Energies 16 00917 i0025.83Transformation/
interlayer mechanism
[58]
V5S8Energies 16 00917 i00311.32Interlayer mechanism[71]
V3S4Energies 16 00917 i0045.681Interlayer mechanism[78]
Table 2. Summary of electrochemical performance of vanadium sulfide cathode materials in AZIBs.
Table 2. Summary of electrochemical performance of vanadium sulfide cathode materials in AZIBs.
Cathode MaterialElectrolyteVoltage Range (V)Capacity (mAh·g−1@A g−1)Cycle StabilityRef.
VS21 M ZnSO40.4–1.0[email protected]98% after 200
cycles at 0.5 A g−1
[47]
VS2@VOOH3 M ZnSO40.4–1.0[email protected]82% after 400
cycles at 2.5 A g−1
[79]
VS2@SS1 M ZnSO40.4–1.0[email protected]80% after 1600
cycles at 1.0 A g−1
[50]
rGO-VS23 M Zn (CF3SO3)20.2–1.8[email protected]93% after 1000
cycles at 5.0 A g−1
[80]
D-VS21 M ZnSO40.2–1.7[email protected]94% after 100
cycles at 0.1 A g−1
[81]
VS2@N-C3 M Zn (CF3SO3)20.2–1.8[email protected]97% after 600
cycles at 1.0 A g−1
[82]
VS2·NH32 M Zn (CF3SO3)20.2–1.7[email protected]110% after 2000
cycles at 3.0 A g−1
[83]
VS2/VOx25 M ZnCl20.1–1.8[email protected]75% after 3000
cycles at 1.0 A g−1
[48]
V2O5·3H2O@VS2 (SVO)3 M ZnSO40.3–1.6[email protected]69.7% after 6700
cycles at 5.0 A g−1
[84]
VS21 M ZnSO40.2–1.0[email protected]72% after 200
cycles at 1.0 A g−1
[85]
1T-VS22.5 M Zn (CF3SO3)20.4–0.85[email protected]86.7% after 2000
cycles at 2.0 A g−1
[49]
VS2@SWCNT(C-VS2)3 M Zn (CF3SO3)20.3–1.5[email protected]72% after 1500
cycles at 5.0 A g−1
[54]
VS4@rGO1 M Zn (CF3SO3)20.35–1.8[email protected]93.3% after 165
cycles at 1.0 A g−1
[63]
VS41 M ZnSO40.2–1.6[email protected]85% after 500
cycles at 2.5 A g−1
[58]
VS4/CNTs2 M Zn (CF3SO3)20.2–1.7[email protected]93% after 1200
cycles at 5.0 A g−1
[66]
S/VOx30 M ZnCl20.1–1.8[email protected]100% after 2000
cycles at 2.0 A g−1
[68]
VS4/V2O33 M Zn (CF3SO3)20.3–1.2[email protected]-[67]
Mn-VS41 M Zn (CF3SO3)2
/ACN (1:1)
0.3–2.0 V[email protected]97.83% after 1000
cycles at 1.0 A g−1
[86]
V5S83 M ZnSO40.2–1.6[email protected]94% after 1000
cycles at 10.0 A g−1
[71]
HCC-V3S42 M ZnSO40.5–1.5[email protected]95% after 200
cycles at 0.5 A g−1
[78]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, E.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z. Recent Progresses on Vanadium Sulfide Cathodes for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Energies 2023, 16, 917. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020917

AMA Style

Hu E, Li H, Zhang Y, Wang X, Liu Z. Recent Progresses on Vanadium Sulfide Cathodes for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Energies. 2023; 16(2):917. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020917

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Enze, Huifang Li, Yizhou Zhang, Xiaojun Wang, and Zhiming Liu. 2023. "Recent Progresses on Vanadium Sulfide Cathodes for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries" Energies 16, no. 2: 917. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020917

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop