The core of the subject is “Contemporary Power Generation Systems”, which encompass both renewable and non-renewable sources. These systems play a crucial role in distributed generation and the efficient utilization of energy resources. The foundation of “Contemporary Energy Storage Solutions” is predicated on its strong integration with power generation, hence providing stability by leveraging storage technologies. The aforementioned storage solutions are dependent on and interconnected with the “Contemporary Infrastructure of Utility Grid”, which is distinguished by its utilization of sophisticated smart grid technologies and the incorporation of distributed generation (DG) and electric vehicles (EVs). At their peak, these interrelated systems provide “Smart City Energy Modeling and Integration”, which prioritizes the improvement of energy efficiency in buildings, the implementation of demand response methods, and the integration of intelligent automation for the purpose of optimizing energy use.
In the field of energy generation, it is essential to investigate energy management systems that maximize power generation in addition to exploring other sources such as renewable and non-renewable energy. Comprehensively reviewing and comprehending the function of energy management in these systems will greatly enhance our overarching view [
4]. However, it is worth noting that alternative non-renewable sources, such as the combined heat and power (CHP) fueled by natural gas and biomass generation, have been recognized for their relatively lower environmental impact compared to conventional methods [
5,
6]. These sources can also be considered feasible short-term solutions for reducing emissions and meeting energy demands [
6]. However, the emergence of distributed generation (DG) is becoming a central focus, as it presents potential benefits in improving efficiency and contributing to the reliability and resilience of the grid [
7]. Extensive research has been conducted on the advantages and requirements associated with distributed generation [
6,
8]. It is important to acknowledge that the advancement of a smart city towards a comprehensive renewable energy framework holds great importance, and distributed generation (DG) can play a crucial role in achieving this goal. Therefore, although traditional power generation may continue to exist in smart cities during the immediate and intermediate stages, its examination is beyond the purview of this section.
2.1. Comprehensive Details of Contemporary Power Generation Systems with an Emphasis on Energy Management Systems
Diverse energy choices can be efficiently incorporated into the structure of a smart city.
Table 1 presents a succinct summary of the key characteristics linked to the examined technologies herein.
A sustainable energy infrastructure must include renewable energy sources and energy management, which includes technology such as photovoltaic (PV) panels, wind turbines, and biomass generation. For maximum efficiency, however, their erratic nature, stemming from their reliance on external factors, necessitates their integration with sophisticated energy management systems [
9,
10,
11,
12,
13]. Solar energy panels use weather-related fluctuations to turn sunlight into electricity. Power output is tracked and predicted by advanced energy management systems [
9], which guarantee a balance of supply and demand and grid integration. Though plentiful, wind energy is unpredictable as wind patterns fluctuate. Customized energy management systems anticipate changes in the grid and modify their power output accordingly [
10,
11]. Material variations are a barrier for biomass energy. By employing sophisticated control systems to optimize fuel supply, integrated energy management [
12,
13] guarantees a consistent and effective energy output. It is considered a dependable source for heating water or other substances that transfer heat, and has uses in various fields [
14]. Thermal collectors (TCs) demonstrate cost-effectiveness when implemented on a restricted scope and can also be utilized in concentrated solar-power (CSP) facilities to produce electricity on a utility scale [
15]. Usually, they are utilized in tandem with thermal power generation systems. Despite the fact that the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for this method of generation is competitive, it is not well-suited to urban contexts. In addition, photovoltaic–thermal collectors (PV/T) operate similarly to conventional solar cells, while simultaneously providing thermal energy, which aids in the heating of water or fluids. PV/T systems have enhanced efficiency; yet, the market exhibits a scarcity of commercial modules, most of which are available in restricted quantities [
16]. Wind turbines (WT) are specifically engineered to capture and utilize the kinetic energy present in the flow of air, thereby converting it into either mechanical or electrical energy. Over the course of its development, this technology has reached a state of maturity and now encompasses a wide array of system sizes, thereby enabling the economically viable generation of energy at a large scale. However, the economic feasibility of the aforementioned wind turbine decreases when implemented on a smaller scale. Due to the inherent instability and unpredictability of wind patterns, it is common practice to supplement wind turbines with supplementary energy sources or storage devices when employed for smaller-scale applications. The importance of biomass has been increasingly recognized in recent years. The resource in question possesses a wide range of applications in the field of energy, as it can be utilized for heat generation through combustion or transformed into gaseous or liquid biofuels. These biofuels have the ability to generate heat or electricity at rates that are comparable to other sources, making them a viable option [
1].
Nevertheless, the production of biomass crops requires a prudent approach in order to guarantee their long-term viability. It is important to highlight that recent European directives impose restrictions on the utilization of first-generation biofuels, which rely on sugars and vegetable oils derived from cultivated crops. However, the same directives promote the use of second-generation biomass derived from woody crops, agricultural leftovers, and waste materials [
1]. Geothermal energy is derived from the transfer of heat that comes from the Earth’s core. This form of energy is generally utilized for thermal production at low to medium temperatures, as well as co-generation at higher temperatures. The economic viability of geothermal energy generation is significantly enhanced in the presence of suitable sub-surface conditions. However, it should be noted that the occurrence of certain soil features is restricted in urban locations [
17]. The notion of poly-generation, also known as multi-generation, has emerged as a means to improve the efficiency of fossil fuel consumption. This is accomplished through the utilization of diverse energy generation methods derived from a singular fuel source, frequently entailing the combustion of natural gas for the purpose of power production, while simultaneously harnessing the remaining heat for alternative applications. The aforementioned methodology not only enhances overall efficacy, but also plays a role in mitigating carbon dioxide emissions [
4]. However, it is important to note that this technology does have a notable drawback in terms of its elevated costs when implemented on a restricted scale [
18]. One example of a viable solution for small-scale energy generation is hydrogen fuel cells. However, it is important to note that the cost associated with the energy produced by these fuel cells is higher than that of standard generation methods.
2.2. Contemporary Techniques for Distributed Power Generation Systems
A critical research dilemma pertaining to distributed generation (DG) centers on determining the most advantageous configuration, location, type, and capacity of the generation units. The objective of this endeavor is to ensure that the system efficiently meets energy requirements while minimizing costs [
3]. Biomass is a versatile, renewable energy source crucial for a cleaner and sustainable future. It finds applications in power generation, energy storage, infrastructure, and smart grid systems. Biomass’s significance in meeting local energy demands in developing countries highlights its affordability and availability [
19]. Biomass contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, offering alternatives in terms of power generation (combustion, pyrolysis, gasification), energy storage (pellets, biofuels), infrastructure development (biofuels, biomaterials), and smart grid systems for flexible electricity supply. This evaluation of biomass encompasses various aspects, including sizing approaches and integration configurations. These configurations include DC-coupled, AC-coupled, or hybrid DC–AC-coupled setups. Furthermore, various control system configurations, including centralized, decentralized, and hybrid approaches, were comprehensively addressed in a recent study [
20].
Based on the instances documented in the current body of research, it becomes apparent that a considerable number of distributed generation (DG) schemes consist of hybrid configurations that incorporate several sources of generation. As an example, one instance of the application of solar power for the purpose of generating both heat and electricity within buildings is demonstrated in [
21]. While this study does investigate geothermal heat pumps (GHP), it does not provide a thorough analysis of other relevant energy sources, and the accuracy of its cost estimates is unclear. Another study [
22] explores the concept of poly-generation, utilizing natural gas as a power source. The study introduces a comprehensive framework for assessing the energy efficiency and carbon dioxide (CO
2) emissions associated with this approach. Nevertheless, this research exhibits a deficiency in addressing the economic aspects of this power source and fails to incorporate a comparative analysis of competing technologies [
23].
Regarding the environmental impact of natural gas and biomass generation, it is essential to clarify that the claim of a relatively lower environmental impact is made in a comparative context. The environmental impact of energy sources is a complex issue, and the statement in
Section 2.2 takes into account multiple factors. While natural gas combustion releases greenhouse gases, its overall emissions, particularly of carbon dioxide (CO
2), are generally lower than other fossil fuels such as coal and oil. Methane, the primary component of natural gas, has a shorter atmospheric lifetime than CO
2, leading to less persistent warming effects. Biomass generation, discussed in the same section, involves the use of organic materials and is considered a renewable energy source, with carbon emissions theoretically reabsorbed by the next generation of plants. The claim acknowledges that natural gas and biomass are not entirely without environmental impact but suggests that, in comparison to certain alternatives, they may offer a more environmentally friendly option.
Similarly, in reference to distributed generation (DG) systems, the contemporary state of the art [
24,
25] combines the modeling of several DG technologies and assesses their economic and technical feasibility. The first article provides an analytical approach to determining the appropriate size of DG systems, while the second article discusses a linear programming problem related to DG systems. Both papers examine DG systems using a single-node technique, which is worth mentioning. In contrast to previous instances where DG systems were formed using different methodologies, numerous notable applications now utilize specialized software tools for this purpose. Article [
26] offers a comprehensive examination of 37 specific computer applications that are well-suited for assessing the combination of renewable energy sources. Among the several tools examined, HOMER [
27] stands out as particularly notable. The software, created by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory [
28], has garnered significant recognition and is widely employed in academic research. In the aforementioned study, the authors make use of HOMER to showcase its effectiveness in improving the planning of DG for microgrids located in Serbia [
7]. In this study, the authors determine the most effective combination of technologies in several scenarios with limitations to their CO
2 reduction. This involves the examination of combined heat and power (CHP), micro-hydro, photovoltaic (PV), and wind turbine (WT) systems. Another tool that can be compared in this field is DERCAM, developed by Berkeley Lab [
29]. One of the uses of this tool involves evaluating the impact of electric vehicles (EVs) on other distributed energy resource (DER) solutions, while also considering the uncertainty associated with EV driving schedules [
30]. The referenced texts provides a comprehensive overview of various applications that utilize these tools [
1,
16,
24]. These applications encompass a wide range of practical implementations of DG systems. It is imperative to emphasize that the range of software tools that are currently available has been extensively scrutinized in the existing body of literature. This assessment has been conducted using various approaches [
21,
31,
32]. The examined tools mostly focus on simulating power systems. While a subset of the tools does address the heat or transportation sectors, it is important to note that their application area and the technology they embrace are constrained by certain limits. It is worth mentioning that there are only three tools that possess the ability to encompass the domains of electricity, heat, and transportation [
21]. The utilization of these instruments has been applied in the simulation of systems that rely solely on renewable sources, without any dependence on traditional forms of power generation. Nevertheless, it is imperative to recognize that these tools do not capture the entirety of the wide range of transportation and generation technologies and storage systems that are distinctive of urban contexts. Moreover, these tools are specifically designed to achieve specific goals, generally focused on evaluating the consequences of different marketing techniques.
Hence, the suitability of these approaches may present difficulties when dealing with alternative problem domains. As previously mentioned, these models have been developed with certain focal areas and purposes, resulting in differences in the technologies included and the level of complexity incorporated into the models. These factors can have an impact on the resulting outcomes. In order to demonstrate this point, the authors of [
33] choose one-hour time intervals and conduct a simulation that covers a period of one year. This choice of time intervals and simulation duration is in line with the objective of the study, which was to determine the most effective investment and operation scheduling for distributed energy resources (DER). In contrast, study [
34] conducts an examination of the most efficient functioning of household appliances within the framework of five-minute intervals, while also accounting for the uncertainties associated with electricity pricing.
In contrast to the study mentioned earlier, this technique prioritizes real-time operation rather than investment planning, resulting in a difference in the level of detail in the temporal intervals. A notable example is shown in [
35], where the authors analyze a distributed generation (DG) case study using two different software tools, specifically, HOMER and RETScreen. Interestingly, significant differences in the DG production outcomes are seen, even when both tools are exposed to similar inputs. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully evaluate and select the most suitable model or tool, ensuring that the chosen software corresponds to the necessary qualities and desired outcomes for its intended application. Numerous research attempts focus on the technological aspects inherent in distributed generation (DG) to assess its practicality. An illustration of this emphasis can be observed in [
36], which presents a comprehensive analysis that includes flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) and distributed generation (DG) systems, as well as their impacts on a network. This study explores several techniques pertaining to the deployment of these systems and the coordination of control strategies. It is important to acknowledge that certain sources are frequently mentioned because they provide a detailed examination of different distributed generation systems. A table below highlights the variability in the achieved results and the contrasting methods of presentation observed in the different studies. Not all studies include statistics pertaining to the reduction of CO
2 emissions, for example. Moreover, economic data, such as payback periods or projected benefits (referred to as a return on investment (ROI)), demonstrate the significant diversity among various studies. The observed variance is notably significant, taking into consideration the year in which the study was conducted and the precise pricing factors that were considered. Therefore, it is advisable to exercise caution when comparing different systems and approaches, considering their potential limits, the valuable insights provided by economic measures and research notwithstanding. In general, optimization procedures tend to produce superior expected profits when compared to alternative methodologies. The optimal sizing of systems that depend on renewable energy sources has the potential to significantly improve their economic and technical efficiency [
37]. This optimization aims to promote the widespread adoption of ecologically friendly resources.
Table 1 presents a comprehensive summary of multiple studies that examine the applications and technologies associated with distributed power production systems.
Table 1.
Contemporary applications and tools for distributed power generation systems.
Table 1.
Contemporary applications and tools for distributed power generation systems.
Study | Focus | Approach | Technologies Explored | Findings | Merits | Demerits |
---|
[3] | Renewable Energy Sources | Long-term investments for energy self-sufficiency | Renewable energy sources | Emphasis on achieving sustainability and safeguarding future generations’ interests | Reduces carbon footprint | Initial investment costs |
[4] | Non-Renewable Sources | Short-term emission reduction | Combined heat and power (CHP), natural gas, biomass generation | Viable short-term options for emission reduction and meeting energy requirements | Provides short-term emission reduction | Finite fuel resources |
[5] | Distributed Generation (DG) | Enhancing efficiency and grid resilience | Distributed generation (DG) systems | DG offers advantages in efficiency, grid dependability, and resilience | Increases grid resilience | Scalability challenges |
[6] | Renewable Energy Framework | Role of DG in renewable energy transition | Distributed generation (DG) systems | DG plays a pivotal role in realizing a fully renewable energy framework for smart cities | Facilitates renewable energy transition | Coordination complexity |
[1] | Hybrid DG Systems’ Design | Sizing and integration configurations | Hybrid DG systems | Comprehensive assessment of design facets for hybrid DG systems | Improves system efficiency | Integration complexity |
[17] | Solar Power in Buildings | Solar power for thermal and electrical generation | Photovoltaic (PV) panels, geothermal heat pumps (GHP) | Solar power used for thermal and electrical generation in buildings | Utilizes renewable energy | Weather-dependent |
[18] | Poly-Generation with Natural Gas | Multi-generation from a single fuel source | Natural gas | Model for evaluating energy performance and CO2 emissions of poly-generation | Efficient utilization of fuel | Emission concerns |
[19] | Economic and Technical Viability | Range of DG technologies | DG technologies | Evaluation of economic and technical viability of multiple DG technologies | Guides technological investment | Capital and operational costs |
[20] | Economic and Technical Viability | DG systems employing a singular-node approach | DG technologies | Examination of economic and technical viability of DG technologies | Assesses feasibility of technology | Complex economic modeling |
[21] | Software Tools Overview | HOMER, DERCAM, and other tools | Various DG technologies | Overview of software tools suitable for evaluating renewable energy integration | Facilitates evaluation of technology | Software learning curve |
[23] | DG Planning Optimization | Microgrids in Serbia | Combined heat and power (CHP), micro-hydro, photovoltaic (PV), and wind turbine (WT) systems | Optimizing DG planning for microgrids with diverse scenarios | Enhances microgrid planning | Integration challenges |
[24] | Distributed Generation Modeling | HOMER and RETScreen tools | Distributed generation (DG) systems | Application of software tools in modeling DG systems | Enables accurate modeling | Data accuracy requirements |
[26] | Distributed Energy Resources | One-hour time intervals, simulation for a year | Distributed energy resources (DER) | Optimal DER investment and operational scheduling | Optimizes energy resource utilization | Complex simulation setup |
[38] | Technical Aspects of DG | FACTS and DG systems, network repercussions | Flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS), DG systems | Examination of technical facets of FACTS and DG systems on networks | Enhances network understanding | Technological complexity |
[39] | Non-Technical Challenges | Competitive mechanisms and regulatory frameworks | Distributed generation (DG) systems | Exploration of non-technical challenges in DG implementation | Identifies regulatory challenges | |
At present, most distributed generation (DG) research concentrates on particular energy sources in hybrid configurations; thorough evaluations of diverse energy sources are scarce. For example, research on the combination of solar power and natural gas [
40,
41] does not include detailed economic analyses or comparisons with competing technologies [
27,
28]. Using tools like HOMER and DERCAM, more recent research uses modeling to evaluate the technical and financial viability of various distributed generation technologies [
19,
20]. However, these models may not be fully capable of replicating urban energy systems or resolving transportation-related issues [
21,
24,
25]. The results produced in [
21,
26,
42] are impacted by the varying complexities of the models used.
In addressing the potential limitations of these models and simulations, there are difficulties because different studies have different simulation times and intervals [
43]. Certain studies employ distinct temporal resolutions, such as one-hour intervals spaced one year apart or five-minute intervals [
26], which correspond to particular goals, some pertaining to real-time operation, others to investment planning. Even with equal inputs, different software tools can produce very different results [
44]. Choosing the appropriate models with care is essential, taking learning objectives into account. Research frequently concentrates on the technological components of DG without adhering to standard procedures for presenting findings, especially when it comes to CO
2 emissions or economic metrics [
21,
26].
Figure 2 illustrates the essential characteristics of different power production methods as outlined in the section dedicated to contemporary power generation systems. The array of technologies encompasses solar panels, thermal collectors, wind turbines, biomass systems, geothermal energy, and poly-generation. It is evident that various energy resources, such as Solar TC, SOLAR CSP, Solar PV/T, wind power, poly-gen, biomass, and geothermal, collectively account for approximately 60% of energy efficiency. However, solar PV alone contributes 30% to this overall energy efficiency [
29]. Furthermore,
Figure 2 illustrates the results of this analysis in the form of a pie chart. The majority of energy efficiency is attributed to solar-concentrated solar power (CSP), with a contribution of 145 units. This is followed by geothermal, biomass, poly-gen, wind power, and solar photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T), each accounting for 13% of the total energy efficiency.
Figure 3 shows a visual breakdown of CO
2 reduction percentages according to various distributed energy resources over selected years. Notably, the integration of combined heat and power (CHP), micro-hydro, photovoltaics (PV), and wind turbines (WT) between 2013 and 2019 has led to a highest recorded reduction of 97%. In contrast, standalone PV systems in the same period achieved a modest reduction of 13.4%. The assortment of colors differentiates each energy resource combination, enhancing the graph’s clarity and allowing for immediate visual comparison of their respective impact on CO
2 reduction across different time spans. This graphical representation underscores the significant potential of diversified energy resource integration in contributing to CO
2 mitigation efforts within the evaluated periods adherence. The CHP technology exhibits the smallest reduction percentage at 10%, while PV demonstrates a reduction of 13.40% and HP exhibits a reduction of 16%.
Figure 4 shows the percentage of CO
2 reduction achieved through various energy resource combinations across different regions and time frames. The data compare the effectiveness of energy combinations in Europe and the US from 2013 to 2019, and in Spain from 2008 to 2010. It shows that the combination of CHP, micro-hydro, PV, and wind turbines (WMT) in the US between 2013 and 2019 achieved the highest CO
2 reduction of 97%. This is significantly higher than any other combination or region shown, including Europe’s PV and CHP combination, which resulted in a 28.3% reduction, and Spain’s CHP implementation, which achieved a 40% reduction from 2008 to 2010. The US’s CHP alone during 2014–2016 shows the lowest reduction of 10%. Each bar is color-coded to visually differentiate between the data points, making it easy to compare the impact of each energy resource combination on the CO
2 emissions’ reduction.
2.3. Integrating Smart Building Technology into Energy Systems
This section attempts to highlight the critical role that smart building technology plays in maximizing the efficiency of modern power generation systems. Many aspects of smart building integration are covered in detail, including the following:
One important component that clarifies how these automated systems intricately connect with energy generation methods are Automation and Control Systems. By reacting instantly to data from sensors and dynamically modifying energy production or storage in response to variations in demand, they play a vital part in controlling energy usage [
45]. In order to optimize power generation systems, real-time data on occupancy, environmental conditions, and energy consumption is provided by sensors, which make sensor technology integration crucial [
46].
Furthermore, the role of energy-efficient infrastructure in smart buildings provides examples of how a building’s construction, materials, and design can minimize energy use and maximize the use of generated electricity [
47]. The use of data analytics and optimization is explained in depth in [
48], emphasizing how data are gathered and analyzed to estimate energy requirements and optimize patterns of energy production and consumption. Additionally, this section highlights how smart buildings affect grid resilience by explaining how they are bidirectional in terms of both supplying and consuming energy, which helps to maintain the stability of the grid as a whole [
49].
Additionally, the incorporation of cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning is discussed, along with how they may be used to optimize energy systems, make predictive adjustments, and learn from trends in energy consumption [
50]. By including these elements, this section seeks to provide a thorough understanding of the ways in which smart building technology integrates with and impacts modern power production systems, highlighting its critical role in the effective management and use of energy resources.
Table 2 shows how smart building technologies intersect with various energy generation methods.
Table 2 illustrates the ways in which different energy generation techniques and smart building technologies interact, listing the techniques and technologies employed as well as their benefits, drawbacks, and citations, for further information.
A key component of improving energy efficiency in the context of modern power generation systems is smart building technology. These structures use state-of-the-art techniques in their creative design to control their HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) systems. With the use of AI-driven algorithms, these intelligent systems, which are outfitted with sensors and automation, adapt dynamically to occupancy patterns and environmental factors in order to optimize energy use and reduce waste [
59,
60]. These systems use data analytics to handle large amounts of real-time data from embedded sensors and extract useful insights. By reducing needless use during their empty hours and producing significant energy savings, machine learning techniques assess trends in energy usage and adjust the HVAC and lighting systems accordingly [
61,
62]. Additionally, smart buildings play a major role in distributed generation systems’ grid resilience. These buildings serve as grid nodes, enabling two-way energy flow and their ability to both consume and return excess energy to the grid. They improve the flexibility of the grid during times of peak generation, balancing energy loads and pulling power in situations where the demand is high. The incorporation of cutting-edge technologies like blockchain, AI, and machine learning enhances energy management in smart building systems. Accurate energy demand forecasting and the deployment of self-learning systems that continuously optimize energy use based on changing patterns and occupant behavior are made possible by AI and machine learning [
63,
64]. Peer-to-peer energy sharing is made possible by blockchain technology, which guarantees safe and transparent energy transactions. This lowers operating costs and boosts overall efficiency [
65,
66].