Next Article in Journal
A Model Modification for a Microturbine Set with Partial Admission Stages
Previous Article in Journal
SDEWES 2023: Barriers and Possibilities for the Development of Short-Rotation Coppice as an Agroforestry System for Adaptation to Climate Change in Central European Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Takahashi et al. Estimating the Dominant Life Phase Concerning the Effects of Battery Degradation on CO2 Emissions by Repetitive Cycle Applications: Case Study of an Industrial Battery System Installed in an Electric Bus. Energies 2023, 16, 1508

1
Energy Systems Research and Development Center, Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation, 72-34, Horikawa-cho, Saiwai-ku, Kawasaki 212-8585, Japan
2
Infrastructure Systems Research and Development Center, Toshiba Infrastructure Systems & Solutions Corporation, 72-34, Horikawa-cho, Saiwai-ku, Kawasaki 212-8585, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2024, 17(8), 1791; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081791
Submission received: 19 January 2024 / Accepted: 19 March 2024 / Published: 9 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section D2: Electrochem: Batteries, Fuel Cells, Capacitors)
In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Equation (1). The corrected Equation (1) appears below.
1 2 L i 2 C O 3 + N i O + 1 4 O 2 L i N i O 2 + 1 2 C O 2
Additionally, the molecular weight of LiNiO2 was incorrect.
Both mistakes were corrected, and the CO2 emission intensity of LiNiO2 was recalculated from 6.24 to 18.35 kg-CO2/kg. In Table 5, the CO2 emission of “Cathod” is changed from 44.4 to 99.6 kg-CO2/Wh_bc due to this modification.
There was a mistake in unit conversion for production electricity, which was needed to convert from “kcal” to “kWh” as a unit of the CO2 emission intensity of electricity energy. In Table 3, the electricity used for production is increased by 0.95 times due to this modification.
Regarding “Anode”, the amount of CO2 emission was corrected because of fixing a calculation error in the datasheet. In Table 5, the CO2 emission of “Anode” is changed from 30.5 to 18.6 kg-CO2/Wh_bc due to this modification.
Regarding “Separator” and “Other components for cell”, the amount of CO2 emission was corrected by reviewing the data-code of IDEA to improve accuracy. In Table 5, the CO2 emission of “Separator” is changed from 1.2 to 0.6 kg-CO2/Wh_bc, and the CO2 emission of “Other components for cell” is changed from 6.4 to 5.7 kg-CO2/Wh_bc due to this modification.
Minor adjustments were made to the numerical values. Some of the revised values do not show respective changes of these corrections due to the way decimal points are represented.
We have revised individual numbers in the “Abstract” and “Results” concerning the five corrections above.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused from these corrections.

Reference

  1. Takahashi, R.; Negishi, K.; Noda, H.; Mizutani, M. Estimating the Dominant Life Phase Concerning the Effects of Battery Degradation on CO2 Emissions by Repetitive Cycle Applications: Case Study of an Industrial Battery System Installed in an Electric Bus. Energies 2023, 16, 1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takahashi, R.; Negishi, K.; Noda, H.; Mizutani, M. Correction: Takahashi et al. Estimating the Dominant Life Phase Concerning the Effects of Battery Degradation on CO2 Emissions by Repetitive Cycle Applications: Case Study of an Industrial Battery System Installed in an Electric Bus. Energies 2023, 16, 1508. Energies 2024, 17, 1791. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081791

AMA Style

Takahashi R, Negishi K, Noda H, Mizutani M. Correction: Takahashi et al. Estimating the Dominant Life Phase Concerning the Effects of Battery Degradation on CO2 Emissions by Repetitive Cycle Applications: Case Study of an Industrial Battery System Installed in an Electric Bus. Energies 2023, 16, 1508. Energies. 2024; 17(8):1791. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081791

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takahashi, Reiko, Koji Negishi, Hideki Noda, and Mami Mizutani. 2024. "Correction: Takahashi et al. Estimating the Dominant Life Phase Concerning the Effects of Battery Degradation on CO2 Emissions by Repetitive Cycle Applications: Case Study of an Industrial Battery System Installed in an Electric Bus. Energies 2023, 16, 1508" Energies 17, no. 8: 1791. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081791

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop