Next Article in Journal
Industrial Electricity Pricing and Renewable Energy: A Temporal Analysis of the Effect of Taxes
Previous Article in Journal
A Hybrid Machine Learning Framework for Early Fault Detection in Power Transformers Using PSO and DMO Algorithms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Inorganic Components on the Supercritical Water Gasification of Semi-Coke
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Advances in CO2 Reduction and H2 Promotion Techniques in Energy Systems

by
Sunel Kumar
1,*,
Dingkun Yuan
2 and
Bairq Zain
3
1
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
School of Energy, Environment and Security Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
3
School of Materials and Environmental Engineering, Changsha University, Changsha 410022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(8), 2025; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082025
Submission received: 25 February 2025 / Accepted: 14 April 2025 / Published: 15 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue CO2 Reduction and H2 Promotion Techniques in Energies)

1. Introduction

The pursuit of sustainable energy solutions is increasingly centered on combating climate change by reducing CO2 emissions [1,2] and promoting hydrogen as a cleaner fuel source [3]. Among the strategies proposed by researchers are carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies [4], which aim to capture CO2 emissions from industrial activity and power plants. By reducing greenhouse gases, these innovations support the adoption of hydrogen-based energy systems [5]. Recent advancements in simulation methods for green hydrogen production—using renewable energy sources—are paving the way for more efficient and environmentally friendly processes. These cutting-edge strategies include blue hydrogen production, enhanced carbon sequestration, and emerging technologies such as coal pyrolysis. Such innovations hold significant potential in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and propelling the hydrogen economy towards sustainability. To realize this potential, scientists and policymakers are working together to develop a comprehensive framework that integrates these approaches, with the aim of reducing carbon footprints and establishing hydrogen as a viable clean energy carrier for transportation, industrial processes, and electricity generation. It is hoped that this will, in turn, create a sustainable energy system and decarbonization pathways that enable global climate objectives to be met.
This article aims to provide an overview of the latest advancements in our Special Issue, “CO2 Reduction and H2 Promotion Techniques in Energies”, that are vital to achieving the above.

2. A Review of the Latest Advances

Panpan et al. [6] examine the influence of key mineral components (SiO2, Al2O3, and CaO) on the supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of semi-coke, aiming to understand their roles in inhibiting or promoting the gasification process [7,8]. Given coal’s significance as an energy source, particularly in China, SCWG represents a cleaner alternative to the conventional coal process, which poses environmental concerns [9]. Using a batch autoclave system, the authors investigate the impact of these minerals with and without a K2CO3 catalyst [6]. The results indicate that while CaO enhances gasification, the effects of SiO2 and Al2O3 vary depending on the catalyst’s presence. Notably, Al2O3 is shown to improve the gasification efficiency by preventing mineral agglomeration and facilitating near-complete carbon gasification, providing valuable insights for making coal conversion more sustainable.
Oleg et al. [10] explore the thermal–hydraulic characteristics of heat transfer in tubular pyrolysis reactor channels with hemispherical protrusions, aiming to enhance the efficiency of this process in organic-waste thermal decomposition. Pyrolysis is a promising method for converting hydrocarbon waste into valuable products such as hydrogen, making efficient heat transfer crucial for improving product quality and reducing secondary reactions [11,12,13,14,15]. The authors combine Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modeling with experimental analysis to assess different channel configurations and coolant flow velocities [12]. The findings reveal that hemispherical protrusions significantly boost heat transfer, with an average increase of 2.23 times compared to smooth channels, and an optimal protrusion height of 2 mm is identified for maximizing efficiency [16].
Joo-Youn et al. [4] investigate the most suitable conditions for biohydrogen production by combining food waste and sewage sludge, analyzing the effects of alkali pretreatment. They also consider solid volatile levels and the influence of blending patterns. Achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 necessitates biological hydrogen production techniques that surpass fossil fuel-based ones [17]. One study found that alkali pretreatment enhances the biodegradability of waste material [18]. The researchers obtained a maximum specific hydrogen production rate of 163.8 mL H2/g volatile suspended solid/h at a 5.0% volatile solid concentration, with food waste making up 62.5% of the mixture. Integrating waste materials with alkali pretreatment holds promise for renewable hydrogen production by alleviating pressure on waste management, supporting worldwide carbon reduction [19].
Tae-Hoon et al. [20] evaluate the use of crude hydrolytic extracellular enzymes (CHEEs) as an economical pretreatment method for waste-activated sludge (WAS) to improve methane production during anaerobic digestion. Efficient WAS management is vital in Korea, where 4 million tons of waste were produced in 2020 and anaerobic digestion is a vital energy conversion technology [21]. The study demonstrates that CHEEs achieve methane production levels similar to those of a four-enzyme commercial mix, thus proving their viability in sustainable solutions [22]. It also reveals that microbial community changes can lead to increased methane production, while indicating that CHEEs offer the potential to reduce operational expenses as well as boost waste management efficiency and renewable energy generation. Sunel et al. [13] investigated the performance of a drop-tube coal gasifier in terms of how O/C ratios and wall temperature parameters affect process outcomes. Another study uses a three-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model to evaluate syngas composition, temperature distribution, and carbon conversion under different operating conditions [23]. The optimal conditions for CO production and carbon conversion (higher than 97%) were achieved at an O/C ratio of 0.9 and a wall temperature of 1800 °C. The results demonstrate the critical need to optimize gasification parameters, which enhances the coal utilization process while minimizing pollutant emissions.
Lijian et al. [24] investigate the impact of adding ruthenium (Ru) to nickel (Ni) catalysts supported on silica (SiO2) to enhance hydrogen iodide (HI) decomposition in the sulfur–iodine (SI) cycle, aiming to improve catalytic activity and sulfur tolerance. They highlight the challenges related to sulfur deactivation in hydrogen production catalysts, which is crucial for reducing CO2 emissions. The methodology involved preparing and characterizing Ni/SiO2 and Ni-Ru/SiO2 catalysts, followed by HI decomposition tests under varying sulfuric acid concentrations, alongside density functional theory (DFT) modeling. The key findings indicate that adding Ru significantly boosts catalyst performance, increasing HI conversion and sulfur resistance. At the same time, theoretical modeling suggests that Ru enhances HI adsorption and reduces sulfur adsorption, leading to a more stable and efficient catalyst for hydrogen production.
Oleg et al. [25] focus on enhancing deep oil sludge processing using innovative pyrolysis methods, examining the impact of a stirrer in a stirred-tank reactor for hydrogen production. Oil sludge, a significant oil and gas industry waste product, poses environmental hazards and contains valuable hydrocarbons [26]. The study introduces a two-stage process that involves first pyrolyzing the oil sludge to generate non-condensable gases, followed by the conversion of these gases into hydrogen. The key findings reveal that using a stirrer significantly improves reaction product concentrations and hydrogen yields, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing heat transfer and catalyst interaction, and thus providing a promising solution for industrial waste management and supporting the transition to cleaner energy.

3. Conclusions

The Special Issue “CO2 Reduction and H2 Promotion Techniques in Energies” showcases the latest advancements in green energy production and waste management, for example, an investigation of supercritical water gasification (SCWG) using mineral additives of CaO and Al2O3. Adopting hemispherical protrusions for pyrolysis reactors was shown to enhance heat transfer performance significantly, and biological processes for hydrogen generation from food waste and sewage sludge reached impressive production rates. Cost-effective waste treatment solutions adopted crude hydrolytic extracellular enzymes, while new coal gasification parameters reached maximum carbon conversion potential. Readers of this Special Issue will discover new possibilities within supercritical water gasification, innovative waste processing, biological hydrogen production from food waste and sewage sludge, and the numerical simulation of coal gasification. The findings within demonstrate how combined strategies promise to improve energy efficiency while confronting environmental problems, accelerating the shift towards renewable systems with reduced greenhouse gas output.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Jiangsu Funding Program for Excellent Postdoctoral Talent (2024ZB892).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the contributors to the Special Issue “CO2 Reduction and H2 Promotion Techniques in Energies” for their valuable articles, and are grateful for the invitation to act as Guest Editors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bairq, Z.; Pang, Y.; Li, J.; Hezam, A.; Tontiwachwuthikul, P.; Chen, H. Reducing energy requirements and enhancing MEA-CO2 desorption rates in amine solutions with KIT-6 nanostructures. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 346, 127536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bakhsh, S.; Zhang, W.; Ali, K.; Oláh, J. Strategy towards sustainable energy transition: The effect of environmental governance, economic complexity and geopolitics. Energy Strategy Rev. 2024, 52, 101330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Le, T.T.; Sharma, P.; Bora, B.J.; Tran, V.D.; Truong, T.H.; Le, H.C.; Nguyen, P.Q.P. Fueling the future: A comprehensive review of hydrogen energy systems and their challenges. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 54, 791–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lefvert, A.; Grönkvist, S. Lost in the scenarios of negative emissions: The role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Energy Policy 2024, 184, 113882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hanson, E.; Nwakile, C.; Hammed, V.O. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies: Evaluating the effectiveness of advanced CCUS solutions for reducing CO2 emissions. Results Surf. Interfaces 2025, 18, 100381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sun, P.; Lv, Z.; Sun, C.; Jin, H.; He, L.; Ren, T.; Cheng, Z. Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Inorganic Components on the Supercritical Water Gasification of Semi-Coke. Energies 2024, 17, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leong, Y.K.; Chen, W.-H.; Lee, D.-J.; Chang, J.-S. Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) as a potential tool for the valorization of phycoremediation-derived waste algal biomass for biofuel generation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 418, 126278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, C.S.; Conradie, A.V.; Lester, E. Review of supercritical water gasification with lignocellulosic real biomass as the feedstocks: Process parameters, biomass composition, catalyst development, reactor design and its challenges. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 415, 128837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, J.; Liu, C.; Han, W.; Xue, X.; Ma, W.; Jin, H. Efficient coal-based power generation via optimized supercritical water gasification with chemical recuperation. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2024, 238, 122164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kolenchukov, O.A.; Bashmur, K.A.; Kurashkin, S.O.; Tsygankova, E.V.; Shepeta, N.A.; Sergienko, R.B.; Pavlova, P.L.; Vaganov, R.A. Numerical and Experimental Study of Heat Transfer in Pyrolysis Reactor Heat Exchange Channels with Different Hemispherical Protrusion Geometries. Energies 2023, 16, 6086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xie, Y.; Qu, H.; Zhang, D. Numerical investigation of flow and heat transfer in rectangular channel with teardrop dimple/protrusion. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2015, 84, 486–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ebrahimi, A.; Naranjani, B. An investigation on thermo-hydraulic performance of a flat-plate channel with pyramidal protrusions. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 106, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kumar, S.; Wang, Z.; He, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Cen, K. Numerical Analysis for Coal Gasification Performance in a Lab-Scale Gasifier: Effects of the Wall Temperature and Oxygen/Coal Ratio. Energies 2022, 15, 8645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, S.; He, Y.; Mahmood, F.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Shuang, W. Catalytic influence of iron oxide (Fe2O3) on coal pyrolysis and char combustion at various temperatures. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 39, 108982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumar, S.; Wang, Z.; Kang, Z.; Xia, J.; Whiddon, R.; He, Y.; Gul-e-Rana, J.; Bairq, Z.A.S.; Cen, K. Influence of temperature and Ca(OH)2 on releasing tar and coal gas during lignite coal pyrolysis and char gasification. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 27, 2788–2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Niu, X.; Tian, H.; Jiang, X.; Lu, Y.; Chen, R.; Gao, J.; Cai, G. A comprehensive transient fluid-solid coupled numerical model for hybrid rocket nozzle erosion and its experimental validation. Acta Astronaut. 2025, 230, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cheng, J.; Yue, L.; Hua, J.; Dong, H.; Zhou, J.; Li, Y.-Y. Hydrothermal alkali pretreatment contributes to fermentative methane production of a typical lipid from food waste through co-production of hydrogen with methane. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 306, 123164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ayim, I.; Ma, H.; Alenyorege, E.A.; Ali, Z.; Donkor, P.O. Integration of ultrasonic treatment in biorefinery of tea residue: Protein structural characteristics and functionality, and the generation of by-products. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2018, 12, 2695–2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Golly, M.K.; Ma, H.; Yuqing, D.; Wu, P.; Dabbour, M.; Sarpong, F.; Farooq, M. Enzymolysis of walnut (Juglans regia L.) meal protein: Ultrasonication-assisted alkaline pretreatment impact on kinetics and thermodynamics. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e12948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, T.-H.; Song, D.; Lee, J.-S.; Yun, Y.-M. Enhanced Methane Production from Pretreatment of Waste Activated Sludge by Economically Feasible Biocatalysts. Energies 2023, 16, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, W.-S.; Park, J.-K.; Park, S.-W. Past, present and future of waste management in Korea. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2015, 17, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Anacleto, T.M.; Kozlowsky-Suzuki, B.; Björn, A.; Yekta, S.S.; Masuda, L.S.M.; de Oliveira, V.P. Methane yield response to pretreatment is dependent on substrate chemical composition: A meta-analysis on anaerobic digestion systems. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, L.; Jia, Y.; Kumar, S.; Li, R.; Mahar, R.B.; Ali, M.; Unar, I.N.; Sultan, U.; Memon, K. Numerical analysis on the influential factors of coal gasification performance in two-stage entrained flow gasifier. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 112, 1601–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, L.; Zhang, K.; Qiu, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z. Catalytic and Sulfur-Tolerant Performance of Bimetallic Ni–Ru Catalysts on HI Decomposition in the Sulfur-Iodine Cycle for Hydrogen Production. Energies 2021, 14, 8539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kolenchukov, O.A.; Bashmur, K.A.; Bukhtoyarov, V.V.; Kurashkin, S.O.; Tynchenko, V.S.; Tsygankova, E.V.; Sergienko, R.B.; Kukartsev, V.V. Experimental Study of Oil Non-Condensable Gas Pyrolysis in a Stirred-Tank Reactor for Catalysis of Hydrogen and Hydrogen-Containing Mixtures Production. Energies 2022, 15, 8346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Liang, H.; Chen, B.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Z.; Wang, Z. Characterization and treatment of oily sludge: A systematic review. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 344, 123245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, S.; Yuan, D.; Zain, B. New Advances in CO2 Reduction and H2 Promotion Techniques in Energy Systems. Energies 2025, 18, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082025

AMA Style

Kumar S, Yuan D, Zain B. New Advances in CO2 Reduction and H2 Promotion Techniques in Energy Systems. Energies. 2025; 18(8):2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumar, Sunel, Dingkun Yuan, and Bairq Zain. 2025. "New Advances in CO2 Reduction and H2 Promotion Techniques in Energy Systems" Energies 18, no. 8: 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082025

APA Style

Kumar, S., Yuan, D., & Zain, B. (2025). New Advances in CO2 Reduction and H2 Promotion Techniques in Energy Systems. Energies, 18(8), 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18082025

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop