In Vitro Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolar Teeth Restored with Prefabricated and Custom-Made Fibre-Reinforced Composite Posts
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Preparation of Materials
2.2. Physicochemical Characterization
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cecchin, D.; De Almeida, J.F.A.; Gomes, B.P.F.A.; Zaia, A.A.; Ferraz, C.C.R. Influence of chlorhexidine and ethanol on the bond strength and durability of the adhesion of the fiber posts to root dentin using a total etching adhesive system. J. Endod. 2011, 37, 1310–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietschi, D.; Duc, O.; Krejci, I.; Sadan, A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review of the literature—Part 1. Composition and micro- and macrostructure alterations. Quintessence Int. 2007, 38, 733–743. [Google Scholar]
- Taha, N.A.; Palamara, J.E.; Messer, H.H. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root-filled teeth restored with direct resin composite restorations under static and fatigue loading. Oper. Dent. 2014, 39, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mohammadi, N.; Kahnamoii, M.A.; Yeganeh, P.K.; Navimipour, E.J. Effect of Fiber Post and Cusp Coverage on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Directly Restored with Composite Resin. J. Endod. 2009, 35, 1428–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balkaya, M.C.; Birdal, I.S. Effect of resin-based materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2013, 109, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocca, G.T.; Rizcalla, N.; Krejci, I. Fiber-reinforced resin coating for endocrown preparations: A technical report. Oper. Dent. 2013, 38, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tay, F.R.; Pashley, D.H. Monoblocks in Root Canals: A Hypothetical or a Tangible Goal. J. Endod. 2007, 33, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wu, Y.; Cathro, P.; Marino, V. Fracture resistance and pattern of the upper premolars with obturated canals and restored endodontic occlusal access cavities. J. Biomed. Res. 2010, 24, 474–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Soares, P.V.; Santos-Filho, P.C.F.; Martins, L.R.M.; Soares, C.J. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: Fracture resistance and fracture mode. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2008, 99, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seow, L.L.; Toh, C.G.; Wilson, N.H.F. Strain measurements and fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with all-ceramic restorations. J. Dent. 2015, 43, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stappert, C.F.J.; Att, W.; Gerds, T.; Strub, J.R. Fracture resistance of different partial-coverage ceramic molar restorations: An in vitro investigation. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2006, 137, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scotti, N.; Scansetti, M.; Rota, R.; Pera, F.; Pasqualini, D.; Berutti, E. The effect of the post length and cusp coverage on the cycling and static load of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Clin. Oral Investig. 2011, 15, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bitter, K.; Noetzel, J.; Stamm, O.; Vaudt, J.; Meyer-Lueckel, H.; Neumann, K.; Kielbassa, A.M. Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Effects of Post Placement on Failure Rate of Postendodontic Restorations: Preliminary Results of a Mean Period of 32 Months. J. Endod. 2009, 35, 1477–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nothdurft, F.P.; Seidel, E.; Gebhart, F.; Naumann, M.; Motter, P.J.; Pospiech, P.R. The fracture behavior of premolar teeth with class II cavities restored by both direct composite restorations and endodontic post systems. J. Dent. 2008, 36, 444–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ho, M.H.; Lee, S.Y.; Chen, H.H.; Lee, M.C. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effects of posts on stress distribution in dentin. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1994, 72, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodacre, C.J.; Spolnik, K.J. The Prosthodontic Management of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Literature Review. Part III. Tooth Preparation Considerations. J. Prosthodont. 1995, 4, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maceri, F.; Martignoni, M.; Vairo, G. Mechanical behaviour of endodontic restorations with multiple prefabricated posts: A finite-element approach. J. Biomech. 2007, 40, 2386–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zicari, F.; Van Meerbeek, B.; Scotti, R.; Naert, I. Effect of fibre post length and adhesive strategy on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. J. Dent. 2012, 40, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saunders, W.P.; Saunders, E.M. Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root-canal therapy: A review. Dent. Traumatol. 1994, 10, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santos, J.M.; Palma, P.J.; Ramos, J.C.; Cabrita, A.S.; Friedman, S. Periapical Inflammation Subsequent to Coronal Inoculation of Dog Teeth Root Filled with Resilon/Epiphany in 1 or 2 Treatment Sessions with Chlorhexidine Medication. J. Endod. 2014, 40, 837–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lassila, L.V.J.; Tanner, J.; Le Bell, A.M.; Narva, K.; Vallittu, P.K. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent. Mater. 2004, 20, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scotti, N.; Coreo Borga, F.A.; Alovisi, M.; Rota, R.; Pasqualini, D.; Berutti, E. Is fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored with indirect onlay composite restorations influenced by fibre post insertion? J. Dent. 2012, 40, 814–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashem, M.; Rez, M.F.; Fouad, H.; Elsarnagawy, T.; Elsharawy, M.; Umar, A.; Assery, M.; Ansari, S.G. Influence of Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles on the Physical and Thermomechanical Behavior of Poly Methyl Methacrylate (PMMA): A Denture Base Resin. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2017, 9, 938–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, T.; Qin, W.; Zhou, J. Controllable synthesis and crystal structure determined upconversion luminescence properties of Tm3+ (Er3+) ions doped YbF3 and NaYbF4 crystals. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 593, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, S.; Ahmad, S.; Agnihotry, S.A. Synthesis and characterization of in situ prepared poly (methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2007, 30, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tham, D.Q.; Hoang, T.; Giang, N.V.; Kim Dung, N.T.; Chung, I. Synthesis and characterization of (4-arm-star-PMMA)/PMMA-g-SiO2 hybrid nanocomposites. Green Process. Synth. 2018, 7, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Wen, Y.; Peng, H.; Zheng, C.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Sun, S.; Xie, X.; Zhou, X. Grafting Polytetrafluoroethylene Micropowder via in Situ Electron Beam Irradiation-Induced Polymerization. Polymers 2018, 10, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khan, A.S.; Khalid, H.; Sarfraz, Z.; Khan, M.; Iqbal, J.; Muhammad, N.; Fareed, M.A.; Rehman, I.U. Vibrational spectroscopy of selective dental restorative materials. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2017, 52, 507–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singhal, A.; Dubey, K.A.; Bhardwaj, Y.K.; Jain, D.; Choudhury, S.; Tyagi, A.K. UV-shielding transparent PMMA/In2O3 nanocomposite films based on In2O3 nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 20913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Łagocka, R.; Mazurek-Mochol, M.; Jakubowska, K.; Bendyk-Szeffer, M.; Chlubek, D.; Buczkowska-Radlińska, J. Analysis of Base Monomer Elution from 3 Flowable Bulk-Fill Composite Resins Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). Med. Sci. Monit. 2018, 24, 4679–4690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamada, Y.; Tsubota, Y.; Fukushima, S. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2004, 17, 94–98. [Google Scholar]
- Tamse, A.; Fuss, Z.; Lustig, J.; Kaplavi, J. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertically fractured teeth. J. Endod. 1999, 25, 506–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- St-Georges, A.J.; Sturdevant, J.R.; Swift, E.J.; Thompson, J.Y. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003, 89, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietschi, D.; Argente, A.; Krejci, I.; Mandikos, M. In vitro performance of class I and II composite restorations: A literature review on nondestructive laboratory trials-part II. Oper. Dent. 2013, 38, 182–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyenberg, K. The ideal restoration of endodontically treated teeth-structural and esthetic considerations: A review of the literature and clinical guidelines for the restorative clinician. Eur. J. Esthet. Dent. 2013, 8, 238–268. [Google Scholar]
- Paolone, G.; Scolavino, S.; Gherlone, E.; Spagnuolo, G. Direct Esthetic Composite Restorations in Anterior Teeth: Managing Symmetry Strategies. Symmetry 2021, 13, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolhuis, H.P.B.; De Gee, A.J.; Feilzer, A.J.; Davidson, C.L. Fracture strength of different core build-up designs. Am. J. Dent. 2001, 14, 286–290. [Google Scholar]
- Manning, K.E.; Yu, D.C.; Yu, H.C.; Kwan, E.W. Factors to consider for predictable post and core build-ups of endodontically treated teeth. Part I: Basic theoretical concepts. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 1995, 61, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Phebus, J.G.; Owens, B.M.; de Rijk, W.; Davis, A.; Johnson, W.W. Fracture resistance of permanent anterior incisors using fiber-reinforced composite posts. Gen. Dent. 2014, 62, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hashemikamangar, S.S.; Hasanitabatabaee, M.; Kalantari, S.; Gholampourdehaky, M.; Ranjbaromrani, L.; Ebrahimi, H. Bond Strength of Fiber Posts to Composite Core: Effect of Surface Treatment With Er,Cr: YSGG Laser and Thermocycling. J. Lasers Med. Sci. 2017, 9, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cagidiaco, M.C.; García-Godoy, F.; Vichi, A.; Grandini, S.; Goracci, C.; Ferrari, M. Placement of fiber prefabricated or custom made posts affects the 3-year survival of endodontically treated premolars. Am. J. Dent. 2008, 21, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Ferrari, M.; Vichi, A.; Fadda, G.M.; Cagidiaco, M.C.; Tay, F.R.; Breschi, L.; Polimeni, A.; Goracci, C. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Endodontically Treated and Restored Premolars. J. Dent. Res. 2012, 91, S72–S78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kivanç, B.H.; Alaçam, T.; Görgül, G. Fracture resistance of premolars with one remaining cavity wall restored using different techniques. Dent. Mater. J. 2010, 29, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Fráter, M.; Forster, A.; Jantyik, Á.; Braunitzer, G.; Nagy, K.; Grandini, S. In vitro fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with fibre-reinforced composite posts using a single or a multi-post technique. Aust. Endod. J. 2017, 43, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Biały, M.; Szust, A.; Napadłek, P.; Dobrzyński, M.; Więckiewicz, W. The three-point bending test of fiber-reinforced composite root canal posts. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2020, 29, 1111–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Post Type | Valid N | Mean [N] | Min [N] | Max [N] | SD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mirafit White | 15 | 968 | 760 | 1222 | 149 |
Rebilda Post | 15 | 1119 | 973 | 1323 | 116 |
EverStick | 15 | 1000 | 776 | 1368 | 163 |
No Post | 15 | 859 | 587 | 1253 | 200 |
Type of FRC Post | Good Prognosis (Supragingival Fracture) | Poor Prognosis (Subgingival Fracture) |
---|---|---|
Mirafit White | 53% (8/15) | 47% (7/15) |
Rebilda Post | 60% (9/15) | 40% (6/15) |
EverStick | 40% (6/15) | 60% (9/15) |
No Post | 27% (4/15) | 73% (11/15) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bialy, M.; Targonska, S.; Szust, A.; Wiglusz, R.J.; Dobrzynski, M. In Vitro Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolar Teeth Restored with Prefabricated and Custom-Made Fibre-Reinforced Composite Posts. Materials 2021, 14, 6214. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14206214
Bialy M, Targonska S, Szust A, Wiglusz RJ, Dobrzynski M. In Vitro Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolar Teeth Restored with Prefabricated and Custom-Made Fibre-Reinforced Composite Posts. Materials. 2021; 14(20):6214. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14206214
Chicago/Turabian StyleBialy, Michal, Sara Targonska, Agnieszka Szust, Rafal J. Wiglusz, and Maciej Dobrzynski. 2021. "In Vitro Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolar Teeth Restored with Prefabricated and Custom-Made Fibre-Reinforced Composite Posts" Materials 14, no. 20: 6214. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14206214