Next Article in Journal
Preparatory Conditions Optimization and Characterization of Hierarchical Porous Carbon from Seaweed as Carbon-Precursor Using a Box—Behnken Design for Application of Supercapacitor
Next Article in Special Issue
Source of Raw Materials and Its Processing for the Manufacturing of Ptolemaic Faience Bowls from Tell Atrib (Nile Delta, Egypt)
Previous Article in Journal
Regularities of Microstructure Evolution in a Cu-Cr-Zr Alloy during Severe Plastic Deformation
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Situ Application of Anti-Fouling Solutions on a Mosaic of the Archaeological Park of Ostia Antica
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 16
10.3390/ma15165747
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distinguishing Genuine Imperial Qing Dynasty Porcelain from Ancient Replicas by On-Site Non-Invasive XRF and Raman Spectroscopy

by
Philippe Colomban
1,*,
Michele Gironda
2,
Gulsu Simsek Franci
3 and
Pauline d’Abrigeon
4
1
MONARIS UMR8233, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 4 Place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France
2
XGLab S.R.L—Bruker, 23 Via Conte Rosso, 20134 Milan, Italy
3
Surface Science and Technology Center (KUYTAM), College of Sciences, Rumelifeneri Campus, Koç University, 34450 Istanbul, Turkey
4
Musée des Arts d’Extrême-Orient, Fondation Baur, Rue Munier-Romilly 8, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(16), 5747; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165747
Submission received: 23 July 2022 / Revised: 12 August 2022 / Accepted: 18 August 2022 / Published: 20 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Materials & Methods for Heritage & Archaeology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The combined use of non-invasive on-site portable techniques, Raman microscopy, and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy on seven imperial bowls and two decorated dishes, attributed to the reigns of the Kangxi, Yongzheng, Qianlong, and Daoguang emperors (Qing Dynasty), allows the identification of the coloring agents/opacifiers and composition types of the glazes and painted enamels. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the elements used in the (blue) marks and those found in the blue, yellow, red, and honey/gilded backgrounds on which, or in reserve, a floral motif is principally drawn. The honey-colored background is made with gold nanoparticles associated with a lead- and arsenic-based flux. One of the red backgrounds is also based on gold nanoparticles, the second containing copper nanoparticles, both in lead-based silicate enamels like the blue and yellow backgrounds. Tin and arsenic are observed, but cassiterite (SnO2) is clearly observed in one of the painted decors (dish) and in A676 yellow, whereas lead (calcium/potassium) arsenate is identified in most of the enamels. Yellow color is achieved with Pb-Sn-Sb pyrochlore (Naples yellow) with various Sb contents, although green color is mainly based on lead-tin oxide mixed with blue enamel. The technical solutions appear very different from one object to another, which leads one to think that each bowl is really a unique object and not an item produced in small series. The visual examination of some marks shows that they were made in overglaze (A608, A616, A630, A672). It is obvious that different types of cobalt sources were used for the imprinting of the marks: cobalt rich in manganese for bowl A615 (Yongzheng reign), cobalt rich in arsenic for bowl A613 (but not the blue mark), cobalt with copper (A616), and cobalt rich in arsenic and copper (A672). Thus, we have a variety of cobalt sources/mixtures. The high purity of cobalt used for A677 bowl indicates a production after ~1830–1850.

1. Introduction

It is well established that Chinese antiquarianism became really systematic in terms of the collection and study of ancient relics during the Song dynasty onward [1,2]. The interest of the Chinese elite in objects from remote dynasties is also well established for bronzes [3,4] as well as for glazed ceramics [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. In addition, the aura given to an object in Asia is primarily a function of the social status of its owner [12]. Consequently, objects manufactured for the emperor, in particular those produced in the imperial workshops, are, therefore, particularly prized. The European elites discovered the production of Chinese and then Japanese porcelains with the establishment of regular Portuguese maritime relations in the 16th century. It was especially in the 17th and 18th centuries when imports developed on a large scale, mainly via the Dutch and English companies and, to a lesser extent, French or Swedish. Collections of oriental objects started and, therewith, the commercial activity of imported ‘old’ or contemporary objects, adapted to the clientele’s tastes, in particular in France by the ‘marchands-merciers’, who altered artifacts to suit local taste by adding gilded bronze [13,14,15]. The Universal Exhibitions organized from the middle of the 19th century [16,17] expanded the interest shown in Asian porcelains and the number of ‘connoisseurs’ collecting these objects [18,19]. The forced opening of China by the Western powers and events such as the sack of the Summer Palace led to the arrival on the market of objects from the imperial collections in particular ‘imperial’ ones [20,21,22,23,24,25]. One of the Universal Exhibitions’ objectives was to identify and show manufacturing techniques to help assimilate new know-how and produce new products. This led to making replicas. ‘Engineer-artists’, such as Théodore Deck [26,27,28,29], and engineer-managers, such as Alexandre Brongniart [30,31,32] for ceramics and Philippe-Joseph Brocard [33] for glass, devoted their activities to replicating the great masterpieces of other civilizations and creating objects freely inspired by models. Some entrepreneurs, such as the Manufacture Samson [34,35,36], devoted their activity to making high-quality replicas. Today, the art market encounters many fakes of various qualities. Developing objective analytical tools for identification, in addition to a subjective visual expertise, is, therefore, not only a real need but also a challenge.
It is important to recall that, for a very long time, the Arts of Fire only used natural raw materials, visually selected, ‘purified’ by simple operations (grinding, washing, heat treatment) [37,38,39,40], both for the products of the base—powdered rocks, predominant by weight (clays, sands, and feldspars and, eventually, grog)—and the materials used in much smaller quantities for enamels, which constitute only around 1 %wt or less of the object. Coloring agents themselves are a very minor part of the enamel, from 0.5 to 5 %wt oxide [40,41,42,43], and raw materials providing color were traded over long distances. The composition of the raw materials is, therefore, not constant, and the variability depends on the visual selection, natural solid solutions, and impurities of the minerals constituting the ores used and their ‘purification’ treatment. During the 19th century, mainly in the second half, the more or less ‘purified’ natural coloring products were replaced by ‘chemicals’, namely, salts (carbonates, sulfates, nitrates) or oxides with a much lower number of impurities [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Therefore, identifying the elements associated with those used to color enamels can be an effective authentication tool [50,51,52].
It is important to differentiate a genuine artifact attesting to an esthetic innovation from ‘replicas’ or ‘copies’ or ‘fakes’ (it is necessary to identify the motivation to use the right qualifier) [53,54]. On the other hand, it is common for an esthetic line to continue to determine shapes and decorations long after its appearance. The identification of specific raw materials used in the artifacts is now possible on site with two non-invasive methods: Raman microspectroscopy and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. We present here the first analysis of seven exceptional enameled bowls of the huafalang 畫琺瑯 or falangcai 琺瑯彩 type (i.e., word-to-word made with Western colors), bearing the imperial mark of the various reigns of the Qing Dynasty, from the collection of the Baur Foundation, in addition to two dishes of the same periods. The studied objects are high-grade examples of 18th century work, such that their qualities are equivalent to oil and pastel paintings, like previous productions of majolica, enamels of Limoges, and enameled watches [55,56]. The three-dimensional heterogeneity of the colored zones led us to compare the data on the number of photons by looking at the ratios of elements which appeared to us, by reasoning, to be relevant. The priceless values of studied artifacts act against their displacement to the laboratory, and also, a fortiori, sampling is prohibited. Comparison with significant series of previous data recorded with different instruments was used to support the discussion after normalization of the data.
To date, only three of these exceptional imperial bowls have been analyzed at the National Museum of Asian Arts-Guimet (Paris, France) but only with Raman microscopy [44]. Elemental composition ratios of blue areas of these bowls have also been compared with those of artifacts assumed to have been made at the Custom District of Guangzhou (Canton), in a recent paper [52]. Rare shards from similar artifacts have also been analyzed [45,46,47,48]. Results will be discussed in order to identify the possible replicas.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Artifacts

Figure 1 presents the studied imperial bowls. Marks are shown in Figure 2, and two dishes are presented in Figure 3. The dating attributions, dimensions, and areas analyzed are listed in Table 1.
The floral decoration of the bowls (Figure 1) is painted ‘on’ (or left in reserve) a plain background, which is colored in yellow (A672, A630), honey-gold (A613), red (A615, A676), and blue (A677, A616). The reign marks (Kangxi, Yongzheng, and Daoguang) are colored either in blue (A613, A672, A615, A630, A616) or red (A677) (Figure 2). A black line is usually used to separate colored areas, as made by Ottoman potters [29,57]. The extra thickness of certain colors is obvious, which indicates their subsequent deposit by additional firing, for example, for the white border of the flower of A615 shown in Figure 1. At the (sub)millimeter scale, visual observation identifies the heterogeneity of the colors, for example, for the yellow and green areas of bowl A630. All of the porcelain bodies are very white. The thicknesses of the enamels look variable, the thinner ones being observed for the dish decoration (e.g., Figure 2), except for a few colors (pink of the flowers in the bouquet of A608, Figure 3).
The selection of objects includes imperial bowls bearing a Kangxi yu zhi 康熙御製 mark (lit. “made by imperial command of the Kangxi emperor” r. 1662–1722) (A613, A672, A676, and A677) supposed to be painted in the Palace workshops (Zaobanchu, 造辦處) in Beijing, in particular, a bowl (from a pair) with a gilded background and a flower and floral scroll design in polychrome enamels on the glaze (A613b) and a yellow-bottomed bowl with similar decoration but where the pistil of the flowers is decorated with auspicious characters (A672). These last two artifacts show the Kangxi yu zhi mark (in overglaze?) in cobalt blue on the base (Figure 2). At the time of the first publication of these objects, there was a controversy in Western academic circles questioning the production of Famille rose enamels, i.e., opaque enamels dominated by the use of a pink glaze obtained by means of colloidal gold, for the Kangxi period [58], such that the objects were at first considered of later date [59] before being reattributed to the Kangxi period [60]. The publication of the Chinese Imperial Collections has helped to dispel the doubts expressed by these specialists. However, apart from these three pieces, which seem to belong to the Kangxi period, the Baur Foundation also possesses two bowls (A676 and A677) also bearing a Kangxi period mark (this time in red on the glaze, Figure 2) whose style differs clearly from this first series. Artifact A677, a bowl with a blue background, shows a decoration of leaf and flower scrolls figured with the idiom wan shou chang chun 萬壽長春 (meaning “a myriad of happiness and longevity”), and the shape evokes a pair currently preserved at the British Museum in London (inv. 1936,0413.33 [61]). The bowl of the Baur Foundation is, however, far from equaling in finesse the decoration of the above-mentioned pair: the overglazed enamels look thicker, the gradation between the colors much less subtle, and the veins of the leaves are reduced to a few strokes, which explains why doubts persisted as to its attribution. On the other hand, the A676 bowl presents an unusual decoration for the period: the flowers, instead of being arranged in a hieratic way at regular intervals on both sides of the bowl, are intermingled and seem to swirl around the bowl. The treatment of the flowers leaves an important part to the nuances of color, giving relief and depth to each petal. The atypical character of the decoration allows us to question the date of the piece.
The objects of the Yongzheng reign 雍正 (1722–1735) include a bowl on a red background (A615) in the continuity of those mentioned above but where the mark (Yongzheng yu zhi) is this time applied with cobalt blue underglaze, which would correspond to a production of Jingdezhen (usually called yangcai 洋彩, pieces made and painted at Jingdezhen) [62,63]. In addition, there is a small bowl (A615) with a blue background and a decoration outlined in gold, reminiscent of the cloisonné enamel technique. Here again, the atypical character of both the shape and the decoration of the piece made attribution difficult. Finally, a dish (A596) decorated with a poem and prunus in flower and with a lime green reverse—one of the new colors created at the turn of the 18th century in China—completes this set [64].
For the Qianlong reign 乾隆 (1736–1795), only one emblematic piece (A608, Figure 3) was chosen: a dish with a red reverse side and a European character decoration, a type of decoration that appeared during this period.
Finally, as a comparison, and to observe a possible evolution in the composition of enamels in the 19th century, an imperial bowl from the Daoguang 道光 reign (1821–1850) with a yellow background and a decoration of intermingled floral scrolls was chosen. This decoration imitates a pattern already visible during the Qianlong period (see similar bowl with Qianlong mark, British Museum, inv. Number Franks.577.+) [65].

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (pXRF)

X-ray fluorescence analysis was performed on site using a portable ELIO (XGLa Bruker, Berlin, Germany) instrument as in previous studies [52,55,56,66]. The set-up included a miniature X-ray tube system with a Rh anode (max voltage of 50 kV, max current of 0.2 mA, and a 1 mm2 collimator) and a large-area Silicon Drift Detector (SDD, 50 mm2 active areas) (XGLab Bruker, Berlin, Germany) with an energy resolution of <140 eV for Mn Kα, an energy range of detection from 0.9 keV to 42 keV (from 1.3 keV in air), and a maximum count rate of 5.6 × 105 cps. Depending on the object, the measurement was carried out by positioning the instrument on the top or on the side. Perfect perpendicularity to the area measured is needed.
Measurements were carried out in the point mode with an acquisition time of 120 s, using a tube voltage of 50 kV and a current of 80 μA. No filter was used between the X-ray tube and the sample. During the analysis, the working distance between the sample and detector was around 15 mm, and the distance between the instrument front and artifact was about 10 mm. Spectral signals were obtained with the optimization of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by selecting the set-up parameters chosen. The analysis depth during the measurement of the enamel was estimated from the Beer–Lambert law (analysis depth, defined as the thickness of the top layer from which comes 90% of the fluorescence) to be close to 6 µm at Si Kα, 170 µm at Cu Kα, 300 µm at Au Lα, and 3 mm at Sn Kα. Within the resolution of the pXRF instrument, the Fe Kβ peak, which may refer to the red pigment, and the Co Kα peak corresponding to the blue color are located in the same energy range. To visually identify the presence of cobalt in the enamel spectrum (except when cobalt is present in traces), we can use the information obtained from looking at the Fe Kα/Fe Kβ ratios. In the absence of cobalt, the relative intensity between Fe Kα and Fe Kβ peaks is about 6/1 [52]. Cobalt is then obvious if the superimposed peaks of Co Kα and Fe Kβ exhibit a stronger intensity than that expected from the above ratio.

2.2.2. Processing of XRF Data

Figure 4 shows the flowchart of the procedure. After recording the raw data with ELIO, the Spectra (the so-called .spx) files were opened in the Artax 7.4.0.0 (Bruker, AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) software. For the data treatment process, the studied objects were considered infinitely thick samples. Before evaluating the analysis data, all of the spectra were imported, and a new method file was created via “Method Editor” of Artax for an applied voltage of 50 kV and current of 80 μA. The corresponding major (e.g., K, Ca), minor (e.g., Fe, Ti, Co), and trace elements (e.g., Ag, Bi, As) were added to the Periodic Table. For the correction, escape and background options were selected in the Method Editor, and 10 cycles of iteration were selected starting from 0.5 keV to 45 keV. The deconvolution method, Bayes, was applied to export the data table. The net area was calculated under the peak at the characteristic energy of each element selected in the periodic table, and the counts of the major, minor, and trace elements were determined in the colored areas (white, red, yellow, orange, blue, green, and black). A normalization with respect to the signal Si was made for the comparison of certain elements, in particular for the data coming from different measurement campaigns. Before plotting the scatter diagrams, the net areas of each element were normalized by the number of XRF photons derived from the elastic peak of the X-ray tube of rhodium. Then, these normalized data were plotted in the ternary scattering plots and tree clustering plots drawn for the interpretation and discussion of the results with the software Statistica 13.5.0.17 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).

2.2.3. Raman Microspectroscopy

Raman analyses were carried out in the museum exhibition room (Figure 2) with a mobile HE532 Raman set-up (HORIBA Scientific Jobin-Yvon, Longjumeau, France) as extensively described in the references [55,56,66,67]. For each colored area in the objects, at least three Raman spectra were recorded to control the representativeness of the collected data on a statistical basis. The reliability of the Raman spectrum starts above 80 cm−1, but a flat spectral background is only obtained over 500 cm−1. A 50× (17 mm long working distance, Nikon France SAS, Champigny-sur-Marne, France) objective was used (surface spot size ~2–4 µm; in-depth ~5–10 µm, the values varying with the color), perpendicular to the sample surface, which allowed the recording of spectra not/poorly contaminated by the sub-layers and/or the silicate matrix if grains were bigger than ~5 µm. Obviously, the power of illumination at the sample should be minimal (1 mW) for dark-colored areas, due to the absorption of light, although up to 10 mW is required for light-colored enamels and more for body and colorless glaze. Unfortunately, measurements performed on site require a rather high power of illumination that can induce phase transformation and oxidation of absorbing phases (dark-colored or black).

3. Results

In this section, we will first visually examine the XRF spectra of the enamels/glazes and colored areas. Then, to compare the data, we will use our net XRF photon counts comparison approach [52] through ternary diagrams concerning the relevant elements and compare the enameling and coloring technologies by defining the characteristic elements of fluxes, coloring agents, and associated impurities. It is important to keep in mind that, due to the nature of the X-ray–matter interaction phenomenon, XRF intensities—visually—are not directly representative of the composition in the volume analyzed, which is highly variable throughout the energy of the X-ray photons represented by the horizontal axis (Figure 5). Thus, in the spectrum of the body in bowl A615, although the element silicon is the main element, its peak (transition Kα) is weak. Moreover, the Kα peak of iron (and Kβ much weaker), for instance, appears stronger, whereas the proportion of this element is at least ten times lower than that of silicon. A small peak of manganese and traces of nickel, copper, zinc, titanium, yttrium, and zirconium are also visible. The XRF spectra of the glazes are very similar, except that the calcium peaks (Kα and Kβ) are a little more intense (Figure 6).
Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9 present the representative XRF spectra of the different regions of ceramics (paste, glaze, and enamels), and Figure 10 and Figure 11 show the corresponding Raman spectra. Traces of lead due to the pollution of the surface of the body (e.g., A615, Figure 5) or the glaze (e.g., A615 mark, Figure 8) were detected between 10 and 15 keV. Indeed, the high volatility of lead oxide led to condensation on cooling at the whole surface of all artifacts in the kiln. The spectrum of glaze (e.g., A615), measured next to the mark, is also quite similar to that of the paste, except for the higher amount of potassium and lower iron, certainly due to some contribution of the glaze–paste interlayer.
We will focus more particularly on coloring agents, transition metals such as cobalt (blue color) and copper (green or red color if in the form of metallic nanoparticles, Cu°), as well as the other transition metals found as their impurities (manganese, nickel, and zinc) [50]. The contribution of the elements to the color is very variable. The power of coloration of cobalt is very strong (0.1 %wt CoO efficiently colors a silicate-based material), although 5 %wt MnO or Fe2O3 does not contribute when the firing is under a reducing atmosphere [50]. For the resolution of the instrument, the Kα peak of cobalt was confused (visually) with the Kβ peak of iron, although peaks of other elements were well observed. We will also consider the presence of arsenic, an element associated with cobalt found in hydrothermal deposits, such as those exploited in Europe [50]. Lead arsenates are very good opacifiers in the glaze and are very easily identified by Raman microspectroscopy [44,45,46,50]. The Kα peak of arsenic appearing confused with the representative peak of lead (Lα), only the Kβ peak is visible, just at the foot of the second strong peak of lead (Lβ) after a weak supplementary Pb peak, for example, on the spectra of bowl A613 (yellow spot) in Figure 6 and the white area of A615 and A677 in Figure 7. The peaks of bismuth are very close to those of lead and, therefore, difficult to identify visually. Only the calculation by simulation-optimization makes it possible to measure the number of photons due to this element, but it is important for the reliability of the comparisons that the elements used for the simulation of the spectrum be detected without ambiguity. Examination of the 20–30 keV spectral window informs very well about tin and antimony content (Figure 5). Note that the Fe peak is already rather strong for the body spectrum.

3.1. Glazed Background

The spectra of the yellow (A672 and A630), golden honey (A613), blue (A677 and A616), and red (A615 and A676) glazed backgrounds are shown in Figure 5. In all of the spectra, except that of A613 (golden honey), the peaks of lead are dominant. The high intensity of lead oxide peaks thus confirms its use as a fluxing agent for the bowl decoration. The honey color—or matte yellow—is actually obtained with gold containing small amounts of silver, nickel, mercury, and copper (Figure 5). The consideration of the ternary diagrams constructed from the net number of XRF photons characteristic of the different elements by simulating the spectrum will make it possible in the next paragraphs to compare the coloring technique and associated elements contributing either to the opacification or the shade or typical of the raw materials.
The red background of the A676 bowl shows the Cu peak a little stronger than the Fe one, which is consistent with the red color obtained by copper nanoparticles Cu°, a traditional Chinese technique [5,8,68]. The blue background (A616) exhibits a Co peak stronger than the Fe Kα peak, indicating coloration with a high level of Co2+ ions. Traces of tin are also observed. Yellow backgrounds (A630 and A672) exhibit mainly lead signature in addition to tin and antimony for A672 and only tin for A630. All backgrounds are, thus, different. Surprisingly, a tin signature was recorded for the red background (A676). The yellow backside of the A608 dish will be discussed further.

3.2. Painted Decor

Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9 show representative XRF spectra of the painted decors. The green color is obtained by adding copper, Cu2+ ions being a traditional coloring agent [5,8] (spectra not shown). Figure 6 confirms that all of the yellow colors (A613 and A672) contain antimony and tin; only tin was measured in the A615 bowl. The level of tin in the green decor of A613 is significant in comparison with A630 and A676. Some white enamels are opacified with a phase containing lead and arsenic (A613, A615, A630, A672, Figure 7), but tin was detected at a high level in the A676 artifact and in A677 at a moderate level in association with arsenic, an unexpected mixture.
Rose (A672) and violet (A615) colors show XRF peaks of gold with traces of tin (Figure 8). The orange-red of A630 is obtained with iron, although the red of A676 shows the Cu peak stronger than the Fe one, which is consistent with a coloring by copper nanoparticles. The slightly higher level of Fe in the A672 red line suggests the use of this element to produce a brownish red hue, but a (very) small Au peak is also observed, as for the A672 rose. Black areas/lines also contain copper, iron, and manganese as well as traces of tin and antimony.
Materials 15 05747 g007 550
Figure 7. Comparison of representative XRF spectra for white painted decor in the 0.1–20 and 20–30 keV energy ranges.
Figure 7. Comparison of representative XRF spectra for white painted decor in the 0.1–20 and 20–30 keV energy ranges.
Materials 15 05747 g007
Materials 15 05747 g008 550
Figure 8. Comparison of representative XRF spectra for rose, red, and violet colors recorded in the 0.1–20 and 20–30 keV energy ranges.
Figure 8. Comparison of representative XRF spectra for rose, red, and violet colors recorded in the 0.1–20 and 20–30 keV energy ranges.
Materials 15 05747 g008

3.3. Reign Marks

Reign marks (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 9), by design, usually feature the name of a specific reign period and then, from the Ming Dynasty onward, also the name of the dynasty. Kangxi-period imperial bowls bearing the Kangxi yu zhi mark (康熙御制) were, when first published, the subject of controversy over their authenticity.
In an article published in 1969 by Harry Garner [58], all of these marks were given as false based on the Jesuit archives uncovered a few years earlier by George Loehr [69]. Since then, Henry Garner’s opinion has been largely disproved, and the latest Foundation catalogs have revised these attributions [60]. The study of marks and their authenticity are the subject of research [53,54,70], but the study of their composition had not been undertaken in a global manner before our previous preliminary study [52]. Some blue marks appear visually to be made in overglaze (A608, A616, A630, and A672). From Figure 9, it is obvious that different types of cobalt sources are used for the imprinting of the marks: cobalt rich in arsenic for bowl A613 (Kangxi reign), cobalt rich in manganese for bowl A615 (Yongzheng reign), cobalt with copper (A616, Yongzheng reign), and cobalt rich in arsenic and copper (A672, Kangxi reign). Thus, we have a variety of cobalt sources/mixtures. Unexpectedly, traces of tin were observed for all blues.
Materials 15 05747 g009 550
Figure 9. Comparison of representative XRF spectra for blue areas in the 0.1–20 and 20–30 keV energy ranges; for comparison, some spectra of paste and glaze coverage are also given; for comparison, glaze spectra are given.
Figure 9. Comparison of representative XRF spectra for blue areas in the 0.1–20 and 20–30 keV energy ranges; for comparison, some spectra of paste and glaze coverage are also given; for comparison, glaze spectra are given.
Materials 15 05747 g009

3.4. Phase Identification

By identifying the phases, crystalline or amorphous, the Raman analysis makes it possible to go further in the identification of the enameling technique and coloring agents as well as the conditions of the decorations (see, e.g., references [44,45,46,50,51,52,55,57]). Remember that, due to the optics used, the volume analyzed is controlled at the micron scale, i.e., much smaller than the one probed by X-ray fluorescence. Therefore, there is no contribution from the underlying materials, the volume probed by Raman microspectroscopy being at the very surface (about 5 to 10 µm in depth, according to the focus).
The spectra of the blue-colored areas of bowl A630 (Figure 10, flower) are similar to those recorded on the blue marks (A613, A672, A615), with a characteristic bending peak of quartz (456 cm−1) and glassy phase (peak from 495 to 502 cm−1) of a glaze fired at higher temperature with the porcelain paste, as commonly observed for glazed porcelain [45,46,66,71,72,73]. The coloring is thus obtained by dissolving the cobalt ions (Co2+) in the lead-free glaze, which is a traditional technique [5,50,72]. The very large Raman cross-section of the As-O bond means that a small amount of lead arsenate induces a strong peak around 810–820 cm−1 (Figure 10), depending on the structure and composition of the lead (calcium/potassium) arsenate formed [50,66,67,73,74]. Table 2 summarizes the identified phases.
According to pXRF measurements, this arsenate signature is, therefore, observed for many enamels, in particular, white and blue, but not for most greens and yellows. Arsenic-rich blue decorations are identified not only in Imperial productions but also in many Famille rose porcelains [44,45,74,75,76,77,78]. As already established [49,52,53,71,72], enamels colored by metallic nanoparticles, gold or copper, give no or a very weak Raman signal but a characteristic broad fluorescence signal (e.g., for A613 honey, A676 red, A615 red); without the XRF spectrum, the nature of the metal cannot be clearly specified.
The two main types of yellow pigment, mainly lead-tin (spectrum ~132–325–350 cm−1 as for the yellow of A630) and complex pyrochlore based on antimony and zinc, usually called Naples yellow (yellow (bck) of A672 with, in particular, the components at 450 and 505 cm−1 plus eventually at ~200 cm−1), are identified in accordance with the previous works [55,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85].
The complexity of the mixture used to achieve the hue is reflected by the presence of a small signal of pyrochlore yellow (~130 cm−1) in the red background of fluorescence of the metallic nanoparticles of A676 or the presence of arsenate (820 cm−1) in the light green from A677.
Enamels rich in lead present a wide band (SiO4 stretching band [86,87]) with several components around 980 cm−1 whose center of gravity shifts toward 1035 cm−1 when the lead content decreases. For the lead-free glaze, the mode is of very low intensity between 1000 and 1150 cm−1, as observed for the colorless glaze close to the marks (A672, A630, A613).
Materials 15 05747 g010a 550Materials 15 05747 g010b 550
Figure 10. Comparison of representative Raman spectra for the different bowls.
Figure 10. Comparison of representative Raman spectra for the different bowls.
Materials 15 05747 g010aMaterials 15 05747 g010b
The presence of cassiterite (characteristic doublet at 633–775 cm−1 [44,46,51,55,66,67,88]) is clear for the yellow and white of the A676 bowl (Figure 10) and A608 and A596 dishes (Figure 11) and in traces for the soft green leaves of A613 and A672. This gives a particular character to these pieces, opacification with cassiterite being a European technique used for a few rare objects at the end of the reign of Kangxi or later [44,55].
Despite the low thickness of the enamels on the two dishes (A608 and A596), good Raman spectra were recorded, which indicates a prior preparation of well-crystallized pigments (Figure 11). A pXRF mapping carried out on site was possible due to the very good flatness of the object. The analysis shows a good agreement with the Raman spectra. The brown-black pigment is made of one (or several) phase(s) with iron-rich spinel structure (characteristic peak at 700 cm−1 [72,76,89,90]) and a manganese-rich phase (peak at ~570–580 cm−1 [90]). The manganese-rich phase is predominant for the brown color, with the addition of hematite, detectable by the component at 1315 cm−1 [90]. Traces of carbon are visible (doublet 1350–1585 cm−1). The pXRF mapping highlights the enamels painted on the glaze. The absence of iron and manganese (characteristic of Asian cobalt) in the blue of the man’s coat is evident. The cobalt is, therefore, imported from Europe [50,75].
Materials 15 05747 g011 550
Figure 11. Comparison of representative Raman spectra for the different colored areas of two dishes (A596 and A608). XRF mapping of A608 center area for different elements showing the variation in their concentrations.
Figure 11. Comparison of representative Raman spectra for the different colored areas of two dishes (A596 and A608). XRF mapping of A608 center area for different elements showing the variation in their concentrations.
Materials 15 05747 g011

4. Discussion

As noted in the Method section, pXRF examination from the top of the artifact cannot allow calculation of the composition. Firstly, the sodium signal will not be detected, due to the lack of a vacuum atmosphere during the measurement. The in-depth analysis explored by the instrument changes with the energy of photons, and, hence, the very top surface (a few microns) is explored for the light elements (e.g., Al, Si, K, Ca) and in-depth, more than a few mm, for heavy elements, such as tin or antimony [52,91]. Even for transition metals, it is possible that the probed thickness (up to ~200 to 300 µm) is greater than the thickness of the colored layer of enamel and, therefore, distorted by the contribution of the underlying glaze or body. However, the thickness of the enamel layer being similar to the depth probed by XRF for transition metals, a comparison of these elements’ ratios can be considered as reliable. Therefore, it makes no sense to want to determine an ‘enamel composition’, especially since the concentration of the coloring agent varies from point to point in the three directions for the creation of complex decoration. Thus, it will be necessary to evaluate the disruption of the XRF measurement of an overglaze by comparing the glaze/silicate matrix’s estimated contribution on a case-by-case basis. However, comparison of ternary diagrams calculated from the net number of XRF photons characteristic of the different elements offers a tool to compare elemental ratio and, hence, raw materials [52]. The results will be compared to the phase identification obtained by Raman microscopy.
The above-described procedure allows the comparison of the ‘local composition ratios’ of some colored areas of different objects, even when the measurements are made with different instruments. In fact, the constitution of ternary diagrams from the net number of XRF photons deforms the representation compared to what a ternary diagram calculated from the compositions would give. It is similar to the transformation of a geographical map incurred by replacing distance by travel time; the representation is distorted, but it is possible to compare and, in particular, to see whether the distribution of the data is spread out or clustered, defining groups.

4.1. Flux and Former

The Pb-K-Ca ternary diagram (Figure 12) shows that all of the decoration is rich in lead, with the exception of the honey-gold background, which is also rich in calcium. This indicates that the gold is placed directly on the glaze and that the lead oxide is only a complementary flux. The very small thickness of gold particles usually measured on similar ceramics (typically 1 µm thick [45,76]) makes the thickness of the associated glassy matrix also thin, and, thus, the contribution of the underglaze layer will be dominant in the pXRF spectrum. The significant signal of arsenic should be noted. Arsenic is usually added to obtain a good sticking between the gold particles (thickness ~1 µm) and the ceramic substrate [92,93]. The Pb-Cu-As ternary diagram confirms that all of the decoration is rich in lead, with the exception of the A613. The Sn-Au-As ternary diagram shows the decoration (rather) rich in arsenic (A615 red and violet, A672 red, A613 and A677 yellow). Sn-Zn-S, Sn-As-Ag, and Sn-Au-Ag ternary diagrams confirm the presence of Sn in many enamels.
The comparison of the impurity diagrams (Y-Rb-Sr and Zr-Rb-Sr, Figure 13) shows the analysis points aligned according to a constant Y/Sr and Zr/Sr ratio, respectively, which indicates that these elements are provided by the same raw material. Data are also rather well-aligned on the Rb-Sr-Ca diagram, except for some enamel that appears Rb-free but Sr-rich. It is usual for the zirconium to be present in the form of zircon partially substituted by yttrium. Very stable, zircon is present in igneous rocks and is preserved in sands and detrital rocks and in enamels made with these raw materials.

4.2. Gilding Technique

The Sn-Au-As (Figure 12) and Sn-Sb-Pb (Figure 13) ternary diagrams highlight the use of gold not only for the honey background of A613 but also for the red background of A615. The high level of the arsenic signal is consistent with a preparation of colloidal gold following Perrot’s recipe (and not Kunckel’s method based on the use of Sn to prepare colloidal gold) [67,94], as observed for many European red enamels of the 17th and 18th centuries. It is possible that the dull shine resulted from the craftsmen’s ignorance of the need to polish the golden surface with agate to obtain the orientation of the gold particles and, thus, the brilliance. The low intensity of the lead signal is also related to the thinness of the gilding—and that of the associated amorphous ‘enamel’ matrix—that leads to an important contribution of the underlying substrate. The signal of silver is well correlated with that of gold. Indeed, silver is generally alloyed with gold to promote bonding with the silicate substrate [92]. The detection of gold in white areas of the A613 artifact may indicate that the gold background is put on the whole surface, and, hence, there is a contribution of the underlayer with gold. The detection of mercury indicates the application of a cold gilding. This may be due to contamination during the restoration with gold lacquer (kintsukuroi 金繕い) or an attempt to improve the appearance of the gilding.

4.3. Yellow, Green, and Red to Pink Colors

Copper (Co2+ ion) is used as a green chromophore (Figure 14). The presence of zinc in the green and yellow-green pyrochlore pigments already observed for the pigments of French enamels [56] and for other Chinese enamels [55] is confirmed. On the contrary, antimony is mixed with tin only for some yellow (the A672 and A613 bowls, both assigned to the Kangxi period), as previously observed [5,8,55]. However, tin is detected in many colored areas: red, rose, orange, green, yellow, and even in some black decors, likely due to the contribution of the sub-layer on which the black was put. In most cases, no cassiterite formation is observed with Raman scattering (except for A676 and 608 artifacts), which suggests that tin was brought as an impurity of one of the elements, probably lead. The red background of A676 obtained by the metallic Cu° precipitates requires a control of the redox reactions by multivalent ions such as Sn and Fe, which are effectively observed. This process has been used since Roman times [43,68,95].
The comparison with the Sr-Y/Zr-Rb data (Figure 13) characteristic of the silicate matrix of enamels/glazes and concerning Chinese blue-and-white porcelains attributed to the Yuan and Ming periods [96,97,98,99], but also contemporary Vietnamese productions from the same periods [99], distinguishes very well the different origins, which is consistent with the use of different raw materials (clays, sand, feldspars, etc.) for each group concerned. Remember that the Sr and Rb elements are flux impurities (K, Ca, Na), while Y and Zr are impurities in refractory materials bringing aluminum and silicon, forming the silicate network. These elements are, thus, very characteristic of the raw materials used to prepare glaze and enamels. It is noted that, for the studied objects, certain ratios are constant but that the Rb content is very variable, which indicates that the quantity of the material providing this element varies greatly. The distribution of the data on a linear axis, which corresponds, in the case of Figure 13 and Figure 15, to constant Y/Sr and Zr/Sr ratios, characterizes the use of varied proportions of different raw materials. This can also come from the variability in the thickness of the enamel layer and variable contribution of the material of the substrate.

4.4. Blue

The cobalt-rich raw material used by potters during the Ming period and most of the Kangxi reign is derived from primary Asian geological sites [50]. It contains an equivalent quantity of other transition metals (iron, manganese, etc.), which imposes a firing under strict reducing conditions to obtain a correct blue color. However, an oxidizing atmosphere leads to ‘dirty’, blackish, or greenish hues and black spots [50]. On the contrary, European (and Persian) cobalt ores are mined from secondary geological sites, hydrothermal veins rich in arsenic, sulfur, nickel, bismuth, copper, and silver [50]. The Co-As-Mn, and Ag-Cu-Bi diagrams (Figure 15) classify very well the different raw materials contributing to the blue color (uranium is also an important element, and more data concerning this element should be collected). Only the A615 mark is typical of Ming cobalt, due to its high level of Mn [96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113]. The cobalts of the A616 mark and background of the A677 bowl are very pure and, therefore, indicate in no way a production of the 18th century [44]. The purity of the cobalt of the A676 mark, much purer than for the areas of enamel of the same color, may indicate that the mark was affixed later, in the 19th century. The arsenic-rich blues certainly use cobalts imported from Europe, not only characterized by the significant level of arsenic but also of bismuth/copper, silver, and nickel. Those containing both arsenic and manganese elements are mixtures of different coloring raw materials.

5. Conclusions

The technical solutions appear very different from one object to another, which leads one to think that each bowl is really a unique object and not an item produced in (small) series. Two categories of reign marks are highlighted. The A615 and A613 underglaze blue marks are covered with a K-rich, lead-free, or lead-poor glaze. This definitively supports the deposition of these marks on the body before firing the body and glazing at Jingdezhen (underglaze mark) for these two artifacts. The other marks are overglazed. They could have been applied with overglazed decoration firing or afterwards, by a special firing at a lower temperature. Examination of Mn, Ag, Ni, Sn, Sb, and As (U not shown on figures) signals in the blue areas show the presence of different groups. The A677, A616, A615, and A613 marks are arsenic-free, and another group is arsenic-poor (A608 (dish) and A630 (19th century)). The A615 bowl mark is rich in Mn, as observed in artifacts produced during the Ming Dynasty. A ‘return’ to traditional Chinese techniques has already been observed for Yongzheng productions [77].
The cobalt of the A677 decoration (attributed with reserves to the reign of Kangxi) and the A616 mark (attributed to the reign of Yongzheng, also with reserves) are quite pure, free of/poor in manganese, and almost free of As, Ni, and Fe. Such a level of purity is strange, and the assignment of artifacts to the period of the reign mark must be questioned. Assignment of the A677 decoration made after 1850 is, thus, consistent with the analytical data. The mark of the A616 bowl also uses rather pure cobalt, but some other characteristics come close to those ascertained in the main group. The question now arises: is that consistent with the addition of the overglazed mark perhaps made on the bowl many years after its production? It is important to note that data measured on blue areas of blue-and-white French soft-paste porcelains from the 17th and early 18th centuries [66] and of enameled watches from the same period [56] are located in the same cluster as Imperial and Guangzhou wares in the Ag-Cu-Bi (Co-normalized) ternary diagram (Figure 15). This definitively supports the use of imported cobalt. The observation of the ternary Y-Rb-Sr, impurities characteristic of the raw materials used to produce the silicate matrix of the enamel, shows that the enameled objects in France form a very different cluster from the enameled objects in Guangzhou or Beijing [52], except the A615, A616, and A677. Therefore, for the other objects, only the coloring matter was imported from Europe, while it is probable that for the three objects belonging to the same cluster, the complete enamel powder was imported. Bowls A613 and A677 bear the marks of the reign of Kangxi and A616 of Yongzheng.
It clearly appears that the blue areas of the objects studied contain more arsenic than the European objects; this indicates either a difference in the degree of selection/purification of the cobalt source (several grades are mentioned in 18th century documents, as reported in [50]) or a deliberate addition.
Objects A608 and A630 have a similar and higher Mn/Fe ratio and are attributed to the Qianlong period; this higher Mn level is consistent with the use of a mixture of European and Asian cobalt to reduce the cost of production. The mixing of different sources, either optimizing the hue or reducing the cost, has already been reported (see in [50]); we also observe a lower As content, as expected for such a mixture. On the other hand, the blue areas of A630 (Daoguang), A608 (Qianlong dish), A616 (uncertain Yongzheng), and A677 (uncertain Kangxi) are in the same group as the enamels attributed to the Guangzhou workshops.
The background of Au° red (A615, Yongzheng) and the other of Cu° red (A676, mark and perhaps period of Kangxi) show a back-and-forth between European and Chinese recipes. For spear opacification, the use of cassiterite is exceptional (A676). The dendrogram constructed for the yellow and green colors colored by Naples yellow pyrochlore-type pigments (Figure 16) shows the variety of signatures. At least three different yellows, the classic Pb-Sn used since the Ming period but also Pb-Sn-Sb-(Zn) complex pyrochlores with different Sn/Sb/Zn ratios. One bowl, A677, clearly appears to be a 19th century ‘copy’; another probably had the addition of a reign mark after its manufacture (A616).
This work demonstrates the possibility of comparing the characteristics of composition and the phases formed in a non-invasive way. The comparisons of the distributions of the normalized XRF count numbers give a representative statistical view, despite the different variabilities intrinsic to the sophistication of the decorations. The recognition of specificities requires the study of series of comparable parts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.C. and P.d.; methodology, P.C. and G.S.F.; investigation, P.C. and M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, P.C., G.S.F. and P.d.; writing—review and editing, P.C., G.S.F., M.G. and P.d. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Laure Schwartz Arenales (Musée des arts d’Extrême-Orient, Fondation Baur) is cordially thanked for their support and their authorization to study the artifacts.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kerlan-Stephen, A.; Pirazzoli-t’Serstevens, M. Autour des Collections D’art en Chine au XVIIIe Siècle; Droz: Genève, Switzerland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hsu, Y.-H. Antiquaries and Politics: Antiquarian Culture of The Northern Song 960-1127. In World Antiquarianism: Comparative Perspectives; Issues &Debates; Schnapp, A., Ed.; Getty Research Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2013; pp. 230–248. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, S. Chinese Bronze Ware, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. Colomban, P.; Tournié, A.; Maucuer, M.; Meynard, P. On-site Raman and XRF analysis of Japanese/Chinese bronze/brass patina—The search of specific Raman signatures. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2012, 43, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, F. The origin and development of traditional Chinese glazes and decorative ceramics color. In Ancient Technology to Modern Science; Kingery, W.D., Ed.; The American Ceramic Society: Colombus, OH, USA, 1985; Volume 1, pp. 163–180. [Google Scholar]
  6. Donnelly, P.J. Blanc de Chine; Faber and Faber: London, UK, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  7. Valenstein, S. A Handbook of Chinese Ceramics; Metropolitan Museum of Art: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wood, N. Chinese Glazes: Their Origins, Chemistry and Recreation; A & C Black: London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ayers, J.; Bingling, Y. Blanc de Chine: Divine Images in Porcelain; China Institute: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kerr, R.; Wood, N.; Needham, J.; Wood, N. Science and Civilisation in China, Volume 5, Part XII: Ceramic Technology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  11. Finley, R. Porcelain City: Jingdezhen in the Eighteenth Century. In The Pilgrim Art: Cultures of Porcelain in World History, 1st ed.; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. Colomban, P. Grès et raku, in Grès et raku du Japon—Techniques décoratives et critères d’appréciation. Taoci 2003, 3, 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  13. Levy, E. Le Goût Chinois en Europe au XVIIIe Siècle: Catalogue du Musée des Arts Décoratifs, June–October 1910, Librairie Centrale des Beaux-Arts Paris 1910. Available online: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k441547m/f1.texteImage (accessed on 28 November 2021).
  14. Castelluccio, S. Le Gout pour les Porcelaines de Chine et du Japon à Paris aux XVIIe et XVIIIe Siècles; Monelle Hayot Editions: Saint-Rémy-en-l’Eau, France, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilson, G.; Watson, F.J.B. Mounted Oriental Porcelain in the J. Paul Getty Museum; J. Paul Getty Museum: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  16. Pinot de Villechenon, F. Les Expositions Universelles; Que Sais-je-Presse; Universitaire de France: Paris, France, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  17. Vasseur, E. Pourquoi organiser des Expositions universelles? Le «succès» de l’Exposition universelle de 1867. Hist. Econ. Soc. 2005, 4, 573–594. [Google Scholar]
  18. Maucuer, M. Grès et porcelaine: Distinction et appréciation par les amateurs occidentaux au XIXe siècle. Taoci 2003, 3, 10–20. [Google Scholar]
  19. D’Albis, T. Le grès japonais dans les collections françaises. Taoci 2003, 3, 20–29. [Google Scholar]
  20. Howald, C.; Saint-Raymond, L. Tracking dispersal: Auction sales from the Yuanmingyuan loot in Paris in the 1860s. J. Art Mark. Stud. 2018, 2, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  21. Saint-Raymond, L. À la Conquête du Marché de L’art: Le Pari(s) des Enchères (1830–1939); Bibliothèque de L’économiste n°36; Classiques Garnier: Paris, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tythacott, L. Collecting and Displaying China’s Summer Palace in the West—The Yuanmingyuan in Britain and France; Routledge: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang, C.H. From the Imperial Court to the International Art Market: Jingdezhen Porcelain Production as Global Visual Culture. J. World Hist. 2012, 23, 115–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chow, E.T.; Drake, F.S. Kuan-Yao and Min-Yao: A study on Imperial Porcelain and people’s Porcelain from K’ang-His to the End of the Ch’ing Dynasty. Arch. Chin. Art Soc. Am. 1959, 13, 54–74. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pierson, S. True Beauty of Form and Chaste Embellishment. Summer Palace Loot and Chinese Porcelain Collecting in Nineteenth-century Britain. In Collecting and Displaying China’s Summer Palace in the West—The Yuanmingyuan in Britain and France, The Histories of Material Culture and Collecting, 1700–1950; Tythacott, L., Ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2018; pp. 72–86. [Google Scholar]
  26. Deck, T. La Faïence; Maison Quantin: Paris, France, 1887. [Google Scholar]
  27. Maucuer, M. La copie des objets asiatiques au XIX siècle: Emile Reiber, Théodore Deck et la collection Cernuschi. Rev. Louvre Mus. Fr. 2011, 3, 80–90. [Google Scholar]
  28. Simsek, G.; Colomban, P.; Milande, V. Tentative differentiation between Iznik tiles and copies with Raman spectroscopy using both laboratory and portable instruments. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2010, 41, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Quéquet, S. Entre Beaux-Arts et Industrie: L’engagement des Peintres de Salon Dans les Manufactures Françaises de Céramique: 1848–1891. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France, 2012. Available online: http://www.theses.fr/2012AMIE0014 (accessed on 18 July 2022).
  30. Preaud, T.; Ostergard, D.E. The Sevres Porcelain Manufactory: Alexandre Brongniart and the Triumph of Art and Industry, 1800–1847; Bard Graduate Center for Studies in the Decorative Arts: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bongniart, A.; Riocreux, D. Description Méthodique du Musée de Céramique de la Manufacture Royale de porcelaine de Sèvres, A; Leleux Libraire-Editeur: Paris, France, 1845; Available online: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6430171d/f9.image (accessed on 21 December 2017).
  32. Brongniart, A. Traité des Arts Céramiques ou Des Poteries Considérées Dans Leur Histoire, Leur Pratique et Leur Théorie; Béchet Jeune—A. Mathias: Paris, France, 1844; Volume 3, Available online: http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb36023945s.public (accessed on 21 December 2017).
  33. Caggiani, M.C.; Valotteau, C.; Colomban, P. Inside the glassmaker technology: Search of Raman criteria to discriminate between Emile Gallé and Philippe-Joseph Brocard enamels and pigment signatures. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2014, 45, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Millet, A. La manufacture de Sèvres ou les stratégies de l’imitation. Entre acquisition d’un savoir-faire et marqueur d’identité (XVIIIe–XIXe siècles). Entrep. Hist. 2015, 78, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mleziva, J. Iznik or Paris? Imitations of Ottoman pottery in the collection of the West Bohemian Museum in Pilsen. Ann. Naprstek Mus. 2016, 37, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Slitine, F. Samson: Génie de L’imitation; Massin: Paris, France, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  37. Jouenne, C.-A. Traité de Céramique et Matériaux Minéraux; Editions Septima: Paris, France, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  38. Haussone, M. Technologie Générale: Faïences, Grès, Porcelaines; Bibliothèque Professionnelle, J.-B. Baillère & Fils: Paris, France, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  39. Colomban, P. Natural nanosized raw materials and Sol-Gel technology: The base of pottery since millenniums. In Nanosciences and Cultural Heritage; Dillmann, P., Bellot-Gurlet, L., Nenner, I., Eds.; Atlantis Press: Paris, France, 2016; pp. 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Colomban, P. Glass, Ceramics and Enamelled Objects. In Conservation Science: Heritage Materials, 2nd ed.; Garside, P., Richardson, E., Eds.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2022; Chapter 7; pp. 200–247. [Google Scholar]
  41. Epler, R.A.; Epler, D.R. Glazes and Glass Coatings; The American Ceramic Society: Westerville, OH, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  42. Fraser, H. Glazes for the Craft Potter, Revised Edition; A & C Black: London, UK; The American Ceramic Society: Westerville, OH, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  43. Colomban, P. Glazes and Enamels. In Encyclopedia of Glass Science, Technology, History, and Culture; Richet, P., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2020; Chapter 10.6. [Google Scholar]
  44. Colomban, P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, B. Non-invasive Raman analyses of huafalang and related porcelain wares. Searching for evidence for innovative pigment technologies. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 12079–12088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Colomban, P.; Ambrosi, F.; Ngo, A.-T.; Lu, T.-A.; Feng, X.-L.; Chen, S.; Choi, C.-L. Comparative analysis of wucai Chinese porcelains using mobile and fixed Raman microspectrometers. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 14244–14256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Colomban, P.; Lu, T.-A.; Milande, V. Non-invasive on-site Raman study of blue-decorated early soft-paste porcelain: The use of arsenic-rich (European) cobalt ores—Comparison with huafalang Chinese porcelains. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 9018–9026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Y.; Zhu, J.; Ji, L.; Shan, Y.; Jiang, S.; Chen, G.; Wang, C. Study of arsenic in Famille rose porcelain from the Imperial Palace of Qing Dynasty, Beijing, China. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 1627–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Duan, H.; Zhang, X.; Kang, B.; Wang, G.; Qu, L.; Lei, Y. Non-destructive analysis and deterioration study of a decorated Famille Rose porcelain bowl of Qianlong Reign from the Forbidden City. Stud. Conserv. 2019, 64, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, Y.; Sciau, P.; Zhu, J.; Ji, L.; Shan, Y.; Song, G. Microscopic analysis of overglaze green pigment on Chinese Famille rose porcelain from the Imperial Palace. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2020, 84, 1106–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Colomban, P.; Simsek Franci, G.; Kırmızı, B. Cobalt and Associated Impurities in Blue (and Green) Glass, Glaze and Enamel: Relationships between Raw Materials, Processing, Composition, Phases and International Trade. Minerals 2021, 11, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Colomban, P. Full spectral range Raman signatures related to changes in enameling technologies from the 18th to the 20th centuries: Guidelines, effectiveness and limitations of the Raman analysis. Materials 2022, 15, 3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Colomban, P.; Simsek Franci, G.; Gironda, M.; d’Abrigeon, P.; Schumacher, A.-C. pXRF Data Evaluation Methodology for On-site Analysis of Precious Artifacts: Cobalt used in the Blue Decoration of Qing Dynasty Overglazed Porcelain enameled at Custom District (Guangzhou), Jingdezhen and Zaobanchu (Beijing) workshops. Heritage 2022, 5, 1752–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pierson, S. True or False? Defining the Fake in Chinese porcelain. Cah. Fram. 2019, 31, 6168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chen, C.E. Fooling the eye: Trompe l’oeil porcelain in High Qing China. Cah. Fram. E-Stor. 2019, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Colomban, P.; Gironda, M.; Vangu, D.; Kırmızı, B.; Zhao, B.; Cochet, V. The technology transfer from Europe to China in the 17th–18th centuries: Non-invasive on-site XRF and Raman analyses of Chinese Qing Dynasty enameled masterpieces made using European ingredients/recipes. Materials 2021, 14, 7434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Colomban, P.; Kırmızı, B.; Gougeon, C.; Gironda, M.; Cardinal, C. Pigments and glassy matrix of the 17th–18th century enamelled French watches: A non-invasive on-site Raman and pXRF study. J. Cult. Herit. 2020, 44, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Simsek, G.; Geckinli, A.E. An assessment study of tiles from Topkapı Palace Museum with energy-dispersive X-ray and Raman spectrometers. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2012, 43, 917–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Garner, H. The Origins of Famille Rose. Trans. Orient. Ceramic Soc. 1969, 37, 1–16. Available online: https://www.orientalceramicsociety.org.uk/publications/transactions/4 (accessed on 2 June 2022).
  59. Ayers, J. The Baur Collection, Geneva-Chinese Ceramics, Volume IV: Painted and Polychrome Porcelains of the Ch’ing Dynasty; Collection Baur: Geneva, Switzerland, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ayers, J. Chinese Ceramics in the Baur Collection; Collection Baur: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  61. Available online: https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/A_1936-0413-33 (accessed on 18 July 2022).
  62. Shih, C.-F.; Peng, Y.-C. On the Origin and Development of Three Terms for Qing Dynasty Overglazed Enamels: Falangcai, Yangcai, and Fencai. Nat. Palace Mus. Res. Q. 2012, 29, 1–74. [Google Scholar]
  63. Wang, C.M. Nomenclature for Painted Enamel on Porcelain in Qing Dynasty: A Scientific Viewpoint. Nat. Palace Mus. Res. Q. 2012, 29, 115–166. [Google Scholar]
  64. Hall, E.; Pollard, A.M. Analysis of Chinese Monochrome Glazes by X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. In Scientific Insights on Ancient Chinese Pottery and Porcelain; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1986; pp. 382–386. [Google Scholar]
  65. Available online: https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/A_Franks-577- (accessed on 22 July 2022).
  66. Colomban, P.; Gironda, M.; Edwards, H.G.M.; Mesqui, V. The enamels of the first (softpaste) European blue-and-white porcelains: Rouen, Saint-Cloud and Paris factories: Complementarity of Raman and X-ray fluorescence analyses with mobile instruments to identify the cobalt ore. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2021, 52, 2246–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Colomban, P.; Kırmızı, B. Non-invasive on-site Raman study of polychrome and white enamelled glass artefacts in imitation of porcelain assigned to Bernard Perrot and his followers. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2020, 51, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sciau, P.; Noé, L.; Colomban, P. Metal nanoparticles in contemporary potters’ master pieces: Lustre and red “pigeon blood” potteries as models to understand the ancient pottery. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 15349–15357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Loehr, G. Missionary-artists at the Manchu Court. Trans. Orient. Ceram. Soc. 1963, 34, 51–67. Available online: https://www.orientalceramicsociety.org.uk/publications/transactions/4 (accessed on 2 June 2022).
  70. Shih, C.F. Wenhua jingzhi: Chaoyue shidai pimei xiyang de Kangxi chao qinggong huafalang Cultural Contending: Kangxi Painted Enamelware as Global Competitor. Minsu quyi 2013, 182, 149–219. [Google Scholar]
  71. Colomban, P.; Treppoz, F. Identification and Differentiation of Ancient and Modern European Porcelains by Raman Macro- and Microspectroscopy. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2001, 32, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Colomban, P.; Sagon, G.; Faurel, X. Differentiation of antique ceramics from the Raman spectra of their coloured glazes and paintings. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2001, 32, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Colomban, P.; Maggetti, M.; d’Albis, A. Non-invasive Raman identification of crystalline and glassy phases in a 1781 Sèvres Royal Factory soft paste porcelain plate. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 38, 5228–5233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Van Pevenage, J.; Lauwers, D.; Herremans, D.; Verhaeven, E.; Vekemans, B.; De Clercq, W.; Vincze, L.; Moens, L.; Vandenabeele, P. A Combined Spectroscopic Study on Chinese Porcelain Containing Ruan-Cai Colours. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Giannini, R.; Freestone, I.; Shortland, A.J. European cobalt sources identified in the production of Chinese Famille rose porcelain. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2017, 80, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Colomban, P.; Ngo, A.-T.; Fournery, N. Non-invasive Raman Analysis of 18th Century Chinese Export/Armorial Overglazed Porcelain: Identification of the Different Enameling Technology. Heritage 2022, 5, 233–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Colomban, P.; Kırmızı, B.; Zhao, B.; Clais, J.-B.; Yang, Y.; Droguet, V. Investigation of the Pigments and Glassy Matrix of Painted Enamelled Qing Dynasty Chinese Porcelains by Noninvasive On-site Raman Microspectrometry. Heritage 2020, 3, 915–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Colomban, P.; Kırmızı, B.; Zhao, B.; Clais, J.-B.; Yang, Y.; Droguet, V. Non-invasive on-site Raman study of pigments and glassy matrix of the 17th–18th century painted enamelled Chinese metal wares: Comparison with French enamelling technology. Coatings 2020, 10, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sakellariou, K.; Miliani, C.; Morresi, A.; Ombelli, M. Spectroscopic investigation of yellow majolica glazes. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2004, 35, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sandalinas, C.; Ruiz-Moreno, S.; Lopez-Gil, A.; Miralles, J. Experimental confirmation by Raman spectroscopy of a Pb-Sn-Sb triple oxide yellow pigment in sixteenth-century Italian pottery. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2006, 37, 1146–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rosi, F.; Manuali, V.; Miliani, C.; Brunetti, B.G.; Sgamellotti, A.; Grygar, T.; Hradil, D. Raman scattering features of lead pyroantimonate compounds. Part I: XRD and Raman characterization of Pb2Sb2O7 doped with tin and zinc. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2009, 40, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pereira, M.; de Lacerda-Aroso, T.; Gomes, M.J.M.; Mata, A.; Alves, L.C.; Colomban, P. Ancient Portuguese ceramic wall tiles (“Azulejos”): Characterization of the glaze and ceramic pigments. J. Nano Res. 2009, 8, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pelosi, C.; Agresti, G.; Santamaria, U.; Mattei, E. Artificial yellow pigments: Production and characterization through spectroscopic methods of analysis. e-Preserv. Sci. 2010, 7, 108–115. [Google Scholar]
  84. Rosi, F.; Manuali, V.; Grygar, T.; Bezdicka, P.; Brunetti, B.G.; Sgamellotti, A.; Burgio, L.; Seccaroni, C.; Miliani, C. Raman scattering features of lead pyroantimonate compounds: Implication for the non-invasive identification of yellow pigments on ancient ceramics. Part II. In situ characterisation of Renaissance plates by portable micro-Raman and XRF studies. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2011, 42, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cartechini, L.; Rosi, F.; Miliani, C.; d’Acapito, F.; Brunetti, G.; Sgamellotti, A.A. Modified Naples yellow in Renaissance majolica: Study of Pb-Sb-Zn and Pb-Sb-Fe ternary pyroantimonates by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2011, 26, 2500–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Colomban, P. Polymerization degree and Raman identification of ancient glasses used for jewellery, ceramic enamels and mosaics. J. Non-Crystall. Solids 2003, 323, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Colomban, P.; Tournié, A.; Bellot-Gurlet, L. Raman identification of glassy silicates used in ceramic, glass and jewellery: A tentative differentiation guide. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2006, 37, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Colomban, P.; Robert, I.; Roche, C.; Sagon, G.; Milande, V. Raman Identification of 18th century soft-paste porcelain: Saint-Cloud, Chantilly, Mennecy et Vincennes/Sèvres. ArchéoSci. Rev. Archéom. 2004, 28, 153–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Colomban, P.; Jullian, S.; Parlier, M.; Monge-Cadet, P. Identification of the high-temperature impact/friction of aeroengine lades and cases y micro Raman spectroscopy. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 1999, 3, 447–459. [Google Scholar]
  90. Froment, F.; Tournié, A.; Colomban, P. Raman identification of natural red to yellow pigments: Ochre and iron-containing ores. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2008, 39, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Available online: https://xrfcheck.bruker.com/InfoDepth (accessed on 6 July 2022).
  92. Colomban, P.; Calligaro, T.; Vibert-Guigue, C.; Nguyen, Q.L.; Edwards, H.G.M. Dorures des céramiques et tesselles anciennes: Technologies et accrochage. ArchéoSciences 2005, 29, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Colomban, P.; Kirmizi, B.; Clais, J.-B.; Gironda, M. An on-site Raman and pXRF study of Joseph Coteau and Philippe Parpette’s jewelled porcelain: A summit of ceramic art. J. Cult. Herit. 2020, 46, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Geyssant, J. Secret du verre rouge transparent de Bernard Perrot et comparaison avec celui de Johann Kunckel. In Bernard Perrot (1640–1709), Secrets et Chefs-D’œuvre des Verreries Royales d’Orléans, Catalogue; SOMOGY Editions, d’Arts; Klinka Ballesteros, I., de Valence, C., Maitte, C., Ricke, H., Eds.; Musée des Beaux-Arts d’Orléans: Paris, France, 2013; pp. 51–54. [Google Scholar]
  95. Bandiera, M.; Verita, M.; Léhuédé, P.; Vilariguès, M. The Technology of Copper-Based Red Glass Sectilia from the 2nd Century AD Lucius Verus Villa in Rome. Minerals 2020, 10, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Simsek, G.; Colomban, P.; Wong, S.; Zhao, B.; Rougeulle, A.; Liem, N.Q. Toward a fast non-destructive identification of pottery: The sourcing of 14th–16th century Vietnamese and Chinese ceramic shards. J. Cult. Herit. 2015, 16, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Simsek Franci, G. Blue Print: Archaeometric Studies of Colored Glazed Chinese Ceramics and Production of Replica, Final Report; The Scientific and Research Council of Turkey, The Scientific and Technological Projects Funding Program: Ankara, Turkey, 2021; unpublished report.
  98. Simsek Franci, G. Handheld X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) versus wavelength dispersive XRF: Characterization of Chinese blue and white porcelain sherds using handheld and laboratory-type XRF instruments. Appl. Spectrosc. 2020, 74, 314–322. Available online: https://opg.optica.org/as/abstract.cfm?uri=as-74-3-314 (accessed on 22 July 2022). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Colomban, P.; Sagon, G.; Huy, L.Q.; Liem, N.Q.; Mazerolles, L. Vietnamese (15th Century) blue-and-white tam thai and luster porcelains/stonwares: Glaze composition and decoration techniques. Archaeometry 2004, 46, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yap, C.T.; Tang, S.M. X-ray fluorescence analysis of modern and recent Chinese porcelains. Archaeometry 1984, 26, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yap, C.T. A quantitative spectrometric analysis of trace concentrations of manganese and cobalt in ceramics and the significance of As/Co and Mn/Co ratios. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1988, 15, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yu, K.N.; Miao, J.M. Locating the origins of blue and white porcelains using EDXRF. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1997, 48, 953–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Yu, K.N.; Miao, J.M. Multivariate analysis of the energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence results from blue and white Chinese porcelains. Archaeometry 1998, 40, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yu, K.N.; Miao, J.M. Characterization of blue and white porcelains using Mn/Fe ratio from EDXRF, with particular reference to porcelains of the Xuande period (1426 to 1435 A.D.). Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1999, 51, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Morimoto, A.; Yamasaki, K. Technical Studies on Ancient Ceramics Found in North and Central Vietnam; Fukuoka Museum: Fukuoka, Japan, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  106. Cheng, H.S.; Zhang, B.; Xia, H.N.; Jiang, J.C.; Yang, F.J. Non-destructive analysis and appraisal of ancient Chinese porcelain by PIXE. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 2002, 190, 488–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wen, J.X.; Chen, Z.K.; Zeng, Q.G.; Hu, L.S.; Wang, B.; Shi, J.P.; Zhang, G.X. Multi-micro analytical studies of blue-and-white porcelain (Ming dynasty) excavated from Shuangchuan island. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 13362–13368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jiang, X.; Ma, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, C.; Yang, Y. Raman analysis of cobalt blue pigment in blue and white porcelain: A reassessment. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 190, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, T.; Zhu, T.Q.; Feng, Z.Y.; Fayard, B.; Pouyet, E.; Cotte, M.; De Nolf, W.; Sciau, P. Synchrotron radiation-based multi-analytical approach for studying underglaze color: The microstructure of Chinese Qinghua blue decors (Ming dynasty). Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 928, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Wen, R.; Wang, C.S.; Mao, Z.W.; Huang, Y.Y.; Pollard, A.M. The chemical composition of blue pigment on Chinese blue-and-white porcelain of the Yuan and Ming Dynasties (AD 1271–1644). Archaeometry 2007, 49, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhou, Y.H.; Hu, Y.J.; Tao, Y.; Sun, J.; Cui, Y.; Wang, K.; Hu, D.B. Study on the microstructure of the multilayer glaze of the 16th–17th century export blue-and-white porcelain excavated from Nan’ao Shipwreck. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 17456–17465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhang, R.; Garachon, I.; Gethin, P.; van Campen, J. Double layers glaze analysis of the Fujian export blue-and-white porcelain from the Witte Leeuw shipwreck (1613). Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 13474–13481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. De Pauw, E.; Track, P.; Verhaeven, E.; Bauters, S.; Acke, L.; Vekemans, B.; Vincze, L. Microbeam X-ray fluorescence and X-ray absorption spectroscopic analysis of Chinese blue-and-white porcelain dating from the Ming dynasty. Spectrochim. Acta Part B 2018, 149, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 05747 g001 550
Figure 1. Views of the imperial bowls. The zooms show the extra thickness deposit (yellow and red arrows), the black lines separating the colored areas, and the heterogeneity of the colored areas (black arrows). See Table 1 for more information. For simplification, only the last three digits of the inventory number (after the point) are used in the text following the letter A.
Figure 1. Views of the imperial bowls. The zooms show the extra thickness deposit (yellow and red arrows), the black lines separating the colored areas, and the heterogeneity of the colored areas (black arrows). See Table 1 for more information. For simplification, only the last three digits of the inventory number (after the point) are used in the text following the letter A.
Materials 15 05747 g001
Materials 15 05747 g002 550
Figure 2. Views of the imperial bowl marks. See Table 1 for details.
Figure 2. Views of the imperial bowl marks. See Table 1 for details.
Materials 15 05747 g002
Materials 15 05747 g003 550
Figure 3. Views of the two dishes under Raman examination (top A608, bottom A596, see Table 1).
Figure 3. Views of the two dishes under Raman examination (top A608, bottom A596, see Table 1).
Materials 15 05747 g003
Materials 15 05747 g004 550
Figure 4. Flowchart of the XRF study and data evaluation procedure.
Figure 4. Flowchart of the XRF study and data evaluation procedure.
Materials 15 05747 g004
Materials 15 05747 g005a 550Materials 15 05747 g005b 550
Figure 5. Comparison of the representative XRF spectra for yellow, golden honey, blue, and red backgrounds recorded in the 0.1–20 and 20–30 keV energy ranges; for comparison, some spectra of paste are also given. Line is guide for eyes.
Figure 5. Comparison of the representative XRF spectra for yellow, golden honey, blue, and red backgrounds recorded in the 0.1–20 and 20–30 keV energy ranges; for comparison, some spectra of paste are also given. Line is guide for eyes.
Materials 15 05747 g005aMaterials 15 05747 g005b
Materials 15 05747 g006 550
Figure 6. Comparison of representative XRF spectra for yellow painted decor in the 0.1–20 and 20–30 keV energy ranges.
Figure 6. Comparison of representative XRF spectra for yellow painted decor in the 0.1–20 and 20–30 keV energy ranges.
Materials 15 05747 g006
Materials 15 05747 g012a 550Materials 15 05747 g012b 550
Figure 12. Comparison of the net number of photons of the elements Pb, Ca, K, Cu, As, Au, Sn, Ag, Sb, and Zn measured on the colored areas. Objects with special characteristics are indicated (see Table 1). Different colored lozenges are used to present the different objects (A677 blue, A613 dark red, etc.). The color indicated in the plots corresponds to that of the studied area (red, violet, honey yellow, orange, green, rose, yellow, and black).
Figure 12. Comparison of the net number of photons of the elements Pb, Ca, K, Cu, As, Au, Sn, Ag, Sb, and Zn measured on the colored areas. Objects with special characteristics are indicated (see Table 1). Different colored lozenges are used to present the different objects (A677 blue, A613 dark red, etc.). The color indicated in the plots corresponds to that of the studied area (red, violet, honey yellow, orange, green, rose, yellow, and black).
Materials 15 05747 g012aMaterials 15 05747 g012b
Materials 15 05747 g013 550
Figure 13. Comparison of the net number of photons of the major (Ca, K) and related trace elements (Y, Rb, Sr, Zr) measured on the colored areas. The data of white and enamel/glaze analyses are plotted separately and compared with the previous data of Chinese and Vietnamese (blue star) artifacts excavated on the kiln site and other places [96,97,98,99]. Objects with special characteristics are indicated (see Table 1). See Figure 12 for a labeling explanation.
Figure 13. Comparison of the net number of photons of the major (Ca, K) and related trace elements (Y, Rb, Sr, Zr) measured on the colored areas. The data of white and enamel/glaze analyses are plotted separately and compared with the previous data of Chinese and Vietnamese (blue star) artifacts excavated on the kiln site and other places [96,97,98,99]. Objects with special characteristics are indicated (see Table 1). See Figure 12 for a labeling explanation.
Materials 15 05747 g013
Materials 15 05747 g014 550
Figure 14. Comparison of the net number of photons of the elements Cu, Sn, and Pb (left) and Cu, Sn, and Sb (right) measured in the green areas. Data are normalized by Si signal.
Figure 14. Comparison of the net number of photons of the elements Cu, Sn, and Pb (left) and Cu, Sn, and Sb (right) measured in the green areas. Data are normalized by Si signal.
Materials 15 05747 g014
Materials 15 05747 g015 550
Figure 15. Comparison of the net number of photons of the major, minor, and trace elements measured on the blue-colored areas (rhomboids for Baur Foundation collection (A) and solid circles for Ariana collection (AR) published in [52]). Samples labeled with AR are porcelains from Jingdezhen kilns enameled at Guangzhou or Jingdezhen [52]. Reference data (open and solid red triangle referring to Yuan and Ming artifacts [96,97,98], open red circle to French soft-paste porcelain [66], and blue star referring to Vietnamese and Chinese artifacts [96,99]) are added for comparison. Objects with special characteristics are indicated (see Table 1). See references for artifact photos; inventory numbers are indicated for artifacts located at the cluster border. Circles and lozenges of various colors, this study, see Figure 12 caption.
Figure 15. Comparison of the net number of photons of the major, minor, and trace elements measured on the blue-colored areas (rhomboids for Baur Foundation collection (A) and solid circles for Ariana collection (AR) published in [52]). Samples labeled with AR are porcelains from Jingdezhen kilns enameled at Guangzhou or Jingdezhen [52]. Reference data (open and solid red triangle referring to Yuan and Ming artifacts [96,97,98], open red circle to French soft-paste porcelain [66], and blue star referring to Vietnamese and Chinese artifacts [96,99]) are added for comparison. Objects with special characteristics are indicated (see Table 1). See references for artifact photos; inventory numbers are indicated for artifacts located at the cluster border. Circles and lozenges of various colors, this study, see Figure 12 caption.
Materials 15 05747 g015
Materials 15 05747 g016 550
Figure 16. Euclidian dendrogram drawn for yellow and green colors.
Figure 16. Euclidian dendrogram drawn for yellow and green colors.
Materials 15 05747 g016
Table
Table 1. Studied artifacts and their characteristics (inventory numbers are simplified in the text using A followed by the last three-digit number in bold); areas analyzed by XRF and Raman (underlined) spectroscopy are given (bck: background); colored spots only studied with Raman are in brackets and underlined.
Table 1. Studied artifacts and their characteristics (inventory numbers are simplified in the text using A followed by the last three-digit number in bold); areas analyzed by XRF and Raman (underlined) spectroscopy are given (bck: background); colored spots only studied with Raman are in brackets and underlined.
ArtifactInventory
Number		Reign MarkDimension/cm and Weight/gSpots Analyzed by XRF and Raman
BodyGlazeYellow
(Honey)		BlueGreenRed-OrangeWhiteBlack
bowlCB.CC.1936.677Kangxi reign mark in red
but probably later period		D. 14.5;
H. 7.4;
297		 yesyellowbck redwhite
bowlCB.CC.1931.676Kangxi mark in colloidal redD. 14.5
H. 6, 1;
127		 yellow green red white
bowlCB.CC.1932.613b
(from a pair)		Kangxi
mark in cobalt blue		D. 12.5;
151		yesclose to flower
close to mark		light-yellow
honey-yellow		flower light markgreen white
bowlCB.CC.1950.672Kangxi reign mark in cobalt blueD. 12.5;
H. 6.5;
156		yesclose to markyellow flower
mark		 rose
scale
line		white
bowlCB.CC.1937.615Yongzheng reign mark in underglaze cobalt blueD. 11;
108		yesclose to markyellow flower
mark		 red(bck)
violet(scale)		white
bowlCB.CC.1930.616Yongzheng reign
mark but maybe later date		D. 9.3;
74		 close to mark -blue (bck)
-mark
dishCB.CC.1936.596Yongzheng
reign mark in overglaze cobalt blue		D. 20 (yellow)
dishCB.CC.1935.608Qianlong reign mark in cobalt blueD. 17.4;
169 		men coat (mapping)
bowlCB.CC.1930.630Daoguang
reign mark in cobalt blue		D.18.5;
489		 close to markyellowflower
mark		green orangewhite black
Table
Table 2. Phases and elements detected (major elements in bold, underlined; NY: Naples yellow (Pb2Sb2−xMxO7-δ); matrix: main Raman peaks of the silicate matrix in which the coloring agents are dispersed).
Table 2. Phases and elements detected (major elements in bold, underlined; NY: Naples yellow (Pb2Sb2−xMxO7-δ); matrix: main Raman peaks of the silicate matrix in which the coloring agents are dispersed).
ArtifactReign MarkPhases and Characteristic Elements (Major, Minor/Traces; Main Raman Peaks (cm−1))
Background
(Color)		MarkYellowBlueGreenViolet, Red to OrangeWhiteBlackMatrix
Bowl
A677		Kangxi reign mark in red
but probably later period		(blue: Co2+)
Quartz, glassy phase.
Co		 Arsenate
(822)
Pb,As,Sn		Bck
Mn,Fe,Co,
Ni,Cu,Zn		Arsenate
(822)
Quartz
Glassy phase
NY		Fe,Ni,SnArsenate (822)
Pb,As,Sn,Fe		 (1015)
Bowl
A676		Kangxi mark in colloidal red(red: Cu)
Pb, Sn,Cu,Ni
Fluorescence		 Cassiterite
NY
(135,333,
505)
Pb,Sn,Sb
As,Cu,Ni,
Fe		 NY
(133,325,459)		Red:
Pb,Sn Fe,Ni,Cu,		Cassiterite
Arsenate (810)
Pb, Sn,
As,Cu,Ni,
Fe
Bowl
A613		Kangxi reign mark in cobalt blue(honey:Au)
Au,Ag,Hg, Pb,Sn,As
Fluorescence		Quartz, glassy
phase
Mn,Fe,Ni,
Co		Light yellow: Sn,Cu
NY (129,198,452)
Pb,As,Fe,
Ni,Cu,Sn,
Sb		Arsenate (820)
Pb,As
Co, Fe,Ni		NY
(130,328,520)
Pb,Cu,As,
Ni, Sn
(trace of cassiterite)		Violet:
Pb,Au,Fe,
Ni,Co,As,
Sn		Arsenate (820)
Pb, Au,Cu,As,
Fe,Ni, Sn		5801020
Bowl
A672		Kangxi reign mark in cobalt blue(yellow)
Pb, Sn,Sb		Quartz,
glassy
phase		NY
(130,197,
335,505)
Pb,Fe,Ni, Sn,Sb		Arsenate (818)
Pb,As,Fe,
Co,Ni		Cassiterite
trace?
NY
(130,197,335,
505)		Rose:
Pb,As,Au,
Sn,Fe,Ni
Red:
Pb,Fe,Ni		Pb,As,Fe,Ni, Sn,Sb
Bowl
A615		Yongzheng reign mark in cobalt blue(red)
Pb,Au, Sn,Cu,Ni,As
Fluorescence		Fe,Mn,Co,
Ni,		NY
Arsenate (810)
Pb,Sn,Ni,Zn		Arsenate
(810)
Pb,As,Fe,
Co,Ni, Cu,Mn,Sn		Glassy phase
Pb,Sn,Cu,
Ni,Zn,Mn
Violet (scale)
As,Au,Zn		Pb, As,Fe, Ni 1035
Bowl
A616		Yongzheng reign
mark but maybe later date		(blue)
Pb,Sn,Co,
Mn,
Fe,Ni,As
Dish
A596		Yongzheng mark and period(yellow) a
Cassiterite
NY (132,327,445)		 Cassiterite
NY
(132,325,445)		 975
(lead-rich)
Dish
A608		Qianlong reign mark in overglaze cobalt blue Quartz,
Glassy phase
Arsenate (780–815)		NY
Arsenate (780–815)		Arsenate (780–815)
Co,Ni,As		Arsenate (780–815)Arsenate (780–815)
NY(132)		Arsenate (780–815)Spinel
MnO2
Pb,Cu,Mn,
Ni,Fe,As		970–1020
(lead-rich)
Bowl
A630		Daoguang
1825–1850
Fe,Mn,
Ni,Co
underglaze		(yellow)
Pb,Sn,
Fe,Ni		Fe,Mn,Ni,
(Co)		NY
(132,325,450)
Pb,Sn,Ni,
Fe,Cu		Quartz,
Glassy phase
Pb,As
Co,Cu,Mn,
Fe,Ni,Sn		NY
(132,325,450)
Pb,Sn,Ni,
Fe,Cu,Sb		(Orange)
Arsenate (823)
NY (132)
Pb,Fe,Ni,
Sn		Arsenate (823)Fluorescence
Pb,Cu,Fe,
Ni,Mn,Sn,
Sb		975–1030
(lead-rich)
a backside.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Colomban, P.; Gironda, M.; Simsek Franci, G.; d’Abrigeon, P. Distinguishing Genuine Imperial Qing Dynasty Porcelain from Ancient Replicas by On-Site Non-Invasive XRF and Raman Spectroscopy. Materials 2022, 15, 5747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165747

AMA Style

Colomban P, Gironda M, Simsek Franci G, d’Abrigeon P. Distinguishing Genuine Imperial Qing Dynasty Porcelain from Ancient Replicas by On-Site Non-Invasive XRF and Raman Spectroscopy. Materials. 2022; 15(16):5747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165747

Chicago/Turabian Style

Colomban, Philippe, Michele Gironda, Gulsu Simsek Franci, and Pauline d’Abrigeon. 2022. "Distinguishing Genuine Imperial Qing Dynasty Porcelain from Ancient Replicas by On-Site Non-Invasive XRF and Raman Spectroscopy" Materials 15, no. 16: 5747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165747

APA Style

Colomban, P., Gironda, M., Simsek Franci, G., & d’Abrigeon, P. (2022). Distinguishing Genuine Imperial Qing Dynasty Porcelain from Ancient Replicas by On-Site Non-Invasive XRF and Raman Spectroscopy. Materials, 15(16), 5747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165747

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop