A Design for the High Yield Photoneutron Source Target Station
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Your work is original and sound. It should be published after tiny corrections that are pointed out in the attached file (Reviewer report.pdf)
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Thanks for the reivewer's nice comments. Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
This manuscript describes a conceptual design of a low-energy accelerator-driven neutron source. I believe this manuscript is out of the scope of this journal, Materials. A neutron source may contribute to the advancement of material characterization techniques, however, it requires many engineering steps to realize the neutron source described in the manuscript. Therefore, I recommend considering submitting this paper to other journals.
Before resubmission, the authors need to fix error messages of reference sources and misuses of capital/small letters.
Author Response
Thanks for the reivewer's nice comments. Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
There are a large number of “Error! Reference source not found.” occurrences in the document that require correction.
Line 25: “have been proved to be that can play” should be “have proved to play”
Line 143: “may be” should be “is”
Line 191: suggest that ~1/100 be changed to ~1%
Line 299: define G-T mode and S-J mode
Line 370: “Figure 1” should be “Figure 7”
Line 385: should this refer to Figure 8 and some other figure?
Line 405: This should be Figure 8
Line 417: delete “an”
Line 439: “leads” is the wrong word. Maybe “means”?
Author Response
Thanks for the reivewer's nice comments. Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
I understand the situation of the special issue. It may be better to comment that a heat removal function may be required for the polythene moderator for those who advance this neutron source project. A temperature increase of a polythene moderator is reported to be about 5 K within one hour in the case of a 1-kW class electron-accelerator-based neutron source. It suggests 50-kW neutron source needs cooling channels not only in a converter but also in other components.
Author Response
We thanks to the reviewers' nice advice. Please see the attachment for the point-by-point response.
As to the manuscript, we provide the following modifications:
- Add a new paragraph in Discussion section “Besides the major problem of heat dissipation ……would be conducted in the future study” to response to reviewer2’s comments.
- Add two citations, citation 25 and 26, with the former one referring to Hirotaku Ishikawa’s work in HUNS and the latter one referring to the thermal conductivity data source.
- In section 3.1, “… a layer of 0.5-mm-thick tantalum …” is corrected as “… a layer of 0.25-mm-thick tantalum …”.
Thank you for the consideration.
Yigang Yang.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf