Next Article in Journal
Tuning Shear Thinning Factors of 3D Bio-Printable Hydrogels Using Short Fiber
Next Article in Special Issue
Guard Ring Design to Prevent Edge Breakdown in Double-Diffused Planar InGaAs/InP Avalanche Photodiodes
Previous Article in Journal
Innovative Methodology for Physical Modelling of Multi-Pass Wire Rod Rolling with the Use of a Variable Strain Scheme
Previous Article in Special Issue
Remarkable Reduction in IG with an Explicit Investigation of the Leakage Conduction Mechanisms in a Dual Surface-Modified Al2O3/SiO2 Stack Layer AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMT
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

GaN Vertical Transistors with Staircase Channels for High-Voltage Applications

1
Graduate Institute of Photonics and Optoelectronics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
2
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(2), 582; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020582
Submission received: 18 November 2022 / Revised: 26 December 2022 / Accepted: 4 January 2023 / Published: 6 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Opto/Electronics Materials and Devices Applied for Telecommunications)

Abstract

:
In this study, we propose and simulate the design of a non-regrowth staircase channel GaN vertical trench transistor, demonstrating an exceptional threshold and breakdown characteristic for high power and high frequency applications. The unique staircase design provides a variable capacitance through the gate-dielectric-semiconductor interface, which results in a high breakdown voltage of 1.52 kV and maintains a channel on-resistance of 2.61 mΩ∙cm2. Because of the variable length and doping profile in the channel region, this model offers greater flexibility to meet a wide range of device application requirements.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Current telecommunications rely on the availability of power supplies. With the explosive demand for high bandwidth and 24/7 connectivity, the electrical infrastructure is facing the challenges of increasing the power conversion efficiency. In recent years, wide bandgap (WBG) materials and their corresponding power devices are attracting much attention. Gallium Nitride (GaN) is a critical WBG material for high-power, high-speed electronics. Compared to other mature devices based on Si or GaAs, GaN-based transistors exhibit exceptional properties, such as low specific on-resistance (Ron), high breakdown-voltage (Vbr), and high operating frequency, giving a fixed device geometry [1,2,3,4,5]. Lateral GaN transistors on Si substrate have been widely studied. They are currently adopted in commercial power electronics due to their cost-effectiveness, as compared with GaN-based devices grown on GaN, SiC or other substrates. However, lateral transistors have two main limitations. First, to sustain high voltage, a large lateral gate to drain spacing is required [6], which inevitably increases the chip size. Second, thermal energy is generated and distributed primarily in the top epilayers because they are where current flow occurs [7,8], making the corresponding thermal resistance per unit chip area higher than vertical type transistors. Therefore, similar to Si power MOSFETs (metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors), GaN vertical transistors have been studied by growing GaN epilayers on GaN substrate. Because lateral GaN power devices on Si substrate suffer from current collapse during high-voltage operation due to carrier trapping in the buffer region [9,10]. GaN on GaN devices have additional advantages. They avoid buffer-induced carrier trappings, making operating voltage much higher than 600 V feasible.
Several works have been reported in the last few years to develop GaN-based vertical transistors [11,12,13]. Based on the device architecture, there are primarily two types of structures [14,15]. The first one is the current aperture vertical electron transistor (CAVET) [16,17], consisting of a 2DEG channel induced by polarization in the AlGaN/GaN interface. In contrast, the second is the vertical GaN trench MOSFET [18,19], which is operated based on the inversion layer. Since the fundamental vertical structure consists of a vertical p-n junction, material regrowth is crucial for most of the above vertical transistors. The pattern etching followed by the regrowth process induces impurities in the interface [20]. Although a post thermal annealing and the in-situ cleaning process can neutralize most impurities [21,22], the regrowth limits the device performance and production yield. For example, the breakdown performance is limited to around 600 V for the trench CAVET [23] and the regrowth-based MOSFET [24]. On the other hand, for a GaN vertical fin-power transistor [25,26] in which material regrowth isn’t required, a higher Vbr (>1kV) is demonstrated.
In this work, we propose and simulate a novel staircase trench design that can attain higher Vbr and low Ron. The design is based on an n+-i-P-n-n+ non-regrowth layer structure with a unique staircase-like channel region. The staircase side wall can be realized with a non-regrowth process, which is one of the essential criteria for minimizing interface defects.

2. Design and Simulation

In order to obtain an in-depth study of the device, a systematic approach to performance analysis is carried out. The model is simulated based on standard semiconductor device physics using Poisson’s equation, carrier continuity equation, and transport equation. Moreover, the breakdown characteristic is calculated by considering Selberherr’s impact ionization model [27,28,29]. The staircase device structure is shown in Figure 1a. In practice, the fabrication of a staircase channel device can be realized by first performing three ICP-RIE (Inductively Coupled Plasma–Reactive Ion Etching) steps; each stops at i-GaN, p-GaN, and n-type drift layer. The etched thickness (though there is tolerance of an over-etch of each step) can be precisely monitored with plasma end-point detection during ICP-RIE etching. Multi-dielectric layer coating with a total thickness higher than 900 nm is proposed to fill up the staircase trench followed by source contact VIA hole etching and source electrode deposition. The gate electrode can be then deposited after the gate VIA hole definition. The drain contact is coated after the drift layer is grinded to the desired thickness. Multiple etching steps increase surface roughness and induce defects which may degrade the carrier mobility. Such surface defects can be effectively passivated with a proper recipe of GaN etching and dielectric deposition. Additionally, some advanced etching methods, such as digital etching with N2 plasma treatment, can minimize exposed defects [30]. Parametric analysis is performed based on two major parameters: device geometry and doping concentrations. As shown in Figure 1, the model is studied by varying the drift length (Ldrift) of the drift layer between 2 and 20 µm and drift doping concentration (ndrift) between 5 × 1015 and 5 × 1016/cm3. The gate to n+-GaN, i-GaN, and p-GaN length, t1, t2, t3, is 300, 200, and 100 nm, respectively. The typical value of p-GaN doping concentration (np), source contact n+-GaN doping concentration (n+), and ndrift is kept at 2 × 1017, 8 × 1018, and 1 × 1016 cm−3, respectively. To highlight the dependence of electrical properties on the device profile near the gate-source region, we compared the proposed staircase structure with the traditional straight channel trench gate (see Figure 1b) and multi-stage staircase (see Figure 1c) structures. The purpose of the multi-stage staircase profile is to understand the electrical field and current distribution when multiple-step etching is applied to the staircase device. It can be considered as a tapered structure if the number of staircase steps is infinite. The gate to channel distance is 200 nm for a straight channel device while that of a multi-stage channel device decreases from 300 to 100 nm as labeled in Figure 1e,f. The epi-structures of all three types of devices are the same throughout the study.
The on-state channel current density of the traditional straight channel trench gate, multi-stage staircase, and staircase channel device are plotted in Figure 1b–d, respectively. The above channel formation is investigated by applying a gate to source voltage higher than the threshold voltage (Vth) (7 V in this work). Among the devices, current density along the vertical sidewall of the traditional straight channel trench gate (Figure 1b) is the highest and the most uniform, with the current distribution deep into the sidewall. For a multi-stage device (Figure 1c), the current density increases with the depth of the channel due to the gradually reduced distance from gate metal. As for the staircase channel, current density depends on the corresponding gate-channel dielectric spacing (e.g., t1, t2, t3) of each step (see Figure 1d). For instance, because of a smaller dielectric thickness between the gate metal and p-GaN, t3, a stronger electric field in the channel leads to narrower carrier confinement, thus a better gate bias control and a higher channel transconductance.
Comparative electric field distribution of the devices is shown in Figure 1e–g. For the staircase design (shown in Figure 1g), due to the shortest spacing between the gate and p-GaN region, the electric field in the p-GaN layer is the strongest. It creates a strong inversion at the interface of the p-GaN region for the staircase channel. It is observed that the electric field at the dielectric/semiconductor interface is strong and exponentially decays away from the interface. The e-field gradient is lower in the intrinsic region than in the p-GaN region, which is one of the reasons for a broader carrier distribution in the intrinsic region.
Vth is one of the key parameters to understanding the device’s switching and leakage performance. A greater value of Vth (generally greater than 3 V) is always expected in high-power applications. Conceptually, it is mainly determined by the p-type and n-type drift layers. The comparative transfer characteristics between straight, multistage, and staircase channels are shown in Figure 2a, in which staircase structure exhibits a higher threshold voltage than the other two types of transistors. For the staircase channel transistor, the variation of Vth with respect to different values of np is plotted in Figure 2b. It is observed that the Vth significantly increases with np. Since a higher np has a stronger depletion and reverse field, it requires a larger gate to source potential (Vgs) to accumulate carriers at the dielectric-semiconductor interface and to switch on the device. Hence a large Vth, extracted from linear extrapolation of the transfer curve, around 6.6 V can be achieved at np of 1 × 1017 cm−3 while keeping ndrift, Lp, Ldrift at 1 × 1016 cm−3, 200 nm, and 12 µm, respectively. Figure 2c also shows a slight dependence of Vth on the ndrift. Variations of Vth to t1, t2, and t3 of the staircase device are explored in Figure 2d. The thickness of a certain parameter is varied by keeping the rest two to their original assigned values. Vth is calculated using linear extrapolation of the transfer curves. It demonstrates that Vth increases with layer thickness.
However, the threshold voltage predominantly depends on t3.
The output characteristics were obtained by sweeping the drain voltage with fixed gate voltages. Figure 3a–c represent the output characteristics of straight, multi-stage, and staircase channels, respectively. Sharp increase of linear current reflects very low Ron values of 1.54 mΩ∙cm2, 1.63 mΩ∙cm2, and 1.77 mΩ∙cm2 for the straight, multistage, and staircase devices, respectively. For this study, the thickness and doping concentration of each layer were kept constant throughout all types of devices. The breakdown characteristics are obtained by sweeping the drain to source voltage and keeping the Vgs less than Vth. A comparative breakdown analysis was carried out among the devices and is plotted in Figure 3d, where the Ldrift is 9 µm and all other structural parameters were kept the same among devices. Vbr, defined as the voltage at which the reverse current is 10−10 A/µm2, of the traditional straight channel trench, multi- stage staircase, and staircase channel transistor is 880, 972, and 1086 V, respectively. It is shown that the staircase design can have superior breakdown performance compared to the other two types of vertical design. This phenomenon can be explained by considering the channel current density depicted in Figure 1b. Moreover, with a careful design of Ldrift (~20 µm), a large Vbr around 2.12 kV can be achieved while keeping np, ndrift, and Lp at 2 × 1017 cm−3, 1 × 1016 cm−3, and 400 nm, respectively.
Conceptually, a larger Ldrift with a smaller ndrift can help distribute the field generated by large drain voltage so that the effective field is lower than the critical field for avalanche breakdown. Therefore, parameter optimization is crucial to satisfy different application requirements. The variation of the staircase channel potential is depicted in Figure 4a. It is observed that the channel potential at dielectric/semiconductor interface is strong and exponentially decays away from the interface. The channel potential gradient is lower in the intrinsic region than that in the p-GaN region, which is one of the reasons for a broader carrier distribution in the intrinsic region. The breakdown occurs as a result of an avalanche process triggered by impact ionization. At a very high drain to source potential, electrons at p-GaN and drift n-GaN interface obtain high kinetic energy and undergo scattering events, where the excess energy transferred to neighboring atom, generating new electron-hole pairs. This process continues and rapid carrier multiplication occurs. Sudden surge in generated carriers results a direct current flow between n+ source and drain terminal, hence the gate loses its control over the channel and avalanche breakdown occurs. The generation rate of interface charges by impact ionization is represented in Figure 4b. It is observed that the impact ionization rate is maximum at the edges as indicated as point P1.
In general, the optimization is performed based on the desired application. In this study, optimization is carried out to achieve balanced performance between high Vbr and low Ron. First, the Ldrift is optimized while maintaining other parameters, np, Lp, and ndrift, constant at 2 × 1017 cm−3, 400 nm, and 1 × 1016 cm−3, respectively. The Ldrift varies from 2 to 20 µm. As shown in Figure 5a, the Vbr increases with Ldrift but gradually saturated when Ldrift exceeds 16 µm. On the other hand, the Ron increases linearly with Ldrift. By setting Ldrift to be 12 µm, we can obtain a Ron of 2.61 mΩ∙cm2 and a Vbr of 1.52 kV. Next, the ndrift is optimized by keeping Ldrift at 12 µm, as plotted in Figure 5b. By increasing ndrift, the Vbr is reduced. The result is due to the reduced Ron when the carrier density between the source and drain increases. When the ndrift is larger than 1 × 1016 cm−3, a sharp decrease of Vbr but a slow decrease of Ron is observed. Hence, the ndrift around 1 × 1016 cm−3 or lower is most acceptable for high-power applications.
Moreover, the p-type region is vital for switching performance and breakdown characteristics. Optimization is carried out by correlating np to Lp. Generally, a thicker p-layer with a higher doping concentration leads to an increase of channel resistance. It improves the breakdown voltage but the channel resistance increase slows down the switching operation. As plotted in Figure 6a, when np increases, the Vbr increases linearly and saturates at np around 2 × 1017 cm−3. Similarly, the Ron increases slowly until np reaches 1 × 1017 cm−3. In such a case, the optimized np is around 2 × 1017 cm−3. In addition, the Ron and Vbr increase with the thickness of the p-type layer, Lp (see Figure 6b). The optimum Vbr and Ron are achieved for Lp around 300~400 nm.

3. Conclusions

In this study, a novel staircase design of a vertical GaN transistor without regrowth is demonstrated. The variable gate dielectric thickness along the channel helps to achieve a Vth of 6.6 V. A comparative study has been made with respect to traditional straight channel trench and multi-stage channel structures. The current density and the electric field profile in the channel of the staircase design show a superior control over channel carrier density compared to other two type of design. By adjusting the layer thickness and doping concentration, a specific device performance is accomplished, which provides adequate design flexibility for a wide range of applications. The stronger off-state effective channel resistance of the staircase structure leads to a high Vbr of up to 2.12 kV and a Ron of 4.21 mΩ∙cm2 at a Ldrift of 20 µm. For a balanced performance between Ron and Vbr, a Vbr of 1.52 kV and a Ron of 2.61 mΩ∙cm2 can also be achieved at Ldrift of 12 µm. The high breakdown voltage with low on-resistance suggests that the devices have the potential for high-voltage applications.

Author Contributions

K.B. and J.-J.H. conceived the idea and planned the research. K.B. and D.-J.L. performed the theoretical modelling. K.B. and C.-K.C. performed the simulation and optimization. K.B., J.-J.H. and R.G. wrote the original draft of the paper, and all authors contributed to the review and editing of the paper. J.-J.H. acquired the funding and supervised the study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan under the 111-2221-E-002-188-MY3 and 111-2218-E-002-025.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abid, I.; Kabouche, R.; Bougerol, C.; Pernot, J.; Masante, C.; Comyn, R.; Cordier, Y.; Medjdoub, F. High Lateral Breakdown Voltage in Thin Channel AlGaN/GaN High Electron Mobility Transistors on AlN/Sapphire Templates. Micromachines 2019, 10, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Enricoo Zanoni, G.M. Integrated Circuits and Systems Gallium Nitride-Enabled High Frequency and High Efficiency Power Conversion; Springer Nature Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lee, C.H.; Lin, W.R.; Lee, Y.H.; Huang, J.J. Characterizations of Enhancement-Mode Double Heterostructure GaN HEMTs with Gate Field Plates. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 488–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nela, L.; Erine, C.; Oropallo, M.V.; Matioli, E. Figures-of-Merit of Lateral GaN Power Devices: Modeling and Comparison of HEMTs and PSJs. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2021, 9, 1066–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lin, D.J.; Yang, J.Y.; Chang, C.K.; Huang, J.J. Study of Current Collapse Behaviors of Dual-Gate AlGaN/GaN HEMTs on Si. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2022, 10, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Amano, H.; Baines, Y.; Beam, E.; Borga, M.; Bouchet, T.; Chalker, P.R.; Charles, M.; Chen, K.J.; Chowdhury, N.; Chu, R.; et al. The 2018 GaN Power Electronics Roadmap. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Y.; Sun, M.; Liu, Z.; Piedra, D.; Lee, H.S.; Gao, F.; Fujishima, T.; Palacios, T. Electrothermal Simulation and Thermal Performance Study of GaN Vertical and Lateral Power Transistors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2013, 60, 2224–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ajayan, J.; Nirmal, D.; Mohankumar, P.; Mounika, B.; Bhattacharya, S.; Tayal, S.; Fletcher, A.S.A. Challenges in Material Processing and Reliability Issues in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs on Silicon Wafers for Future RF Power Electronics & Switching Applications: A Critical Review. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2022, 151, 106982. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang, J.X.; Lin, D.J.; Wu, Y.R.; Huang, J.J. Deep Source Metal Trenches in GaN-On-Si HEMTs for Relieving Current Collapse. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2021, 9, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar Subramani, N.; Couvidat, J.; Al Hajjar, A.; Nallatamby, J.-C.; Sommet, R.; Quéré, R. Identification of GaN Buffer Traps in Microwave Power AlGaN/GaN HEMTs Through Low Frequency S-Parameters Measurements and TCAD-Based Physical Device Simulations. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2017, 5, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abdul Khadar, R.M.; Liu, C.; Soleimanzadeh, R.; Matioli, E. Fully Vertical GaN-on-Si Power MOSFETs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2019, 40, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ma, J.; Matioli, E. High Performance Tri-Gate GaN Power MOSHEMTs on Silicon Substrate. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2017, 38, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nie, H.; Diduck, Q.; Alvarez, B.; Edwards, A.P.; Kayes, B.M.; Zhang, M.; Ye, G.; Prunty, T.; Bour, D.; Kizilyalli, I.C. 1.5-KV and 2.2-Mω-Cm2 Vertical Gan Transistors on Bulk-GaN Substrates. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2014, 35, 939–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, S.; Song, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, S.; Luo, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, H.; Liu, Z.; et al. Comprehensive Design of Device Parameters for GaN Vertical Trench MOSFETs. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 57126–57135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ishida, T.; Pil Nam, K.; Matys, M.; Uesugi, T.; Suda, J.; Kachi, T. Improvement of Channel Property of GaN Vertical Trench MOSFET by Compensating Nitrogen Vacancies with Nitrogen Plasma Treatment. Appl. Phys. Express 2020, 13, 124003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ishida, T.; Sakao, K.; Kachi, T.; Suda, J. Impact of Channel Mobility on Design Optimization of 600-3300 V-Class High-Speed GaN Vertical-Trench MOSFETs Based on TCAD Simulation. Appl. Phys. Express 2021, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chowdhury, S.; Mishra, U.K. Lateral and Vertical Transistors Using the Algan/GAN Heterostructure. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2013, 60, 3060–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ji, D.; Laurent, M.A.; Agarwal, A.; Li, W.; Mandal, S.; Keller, S.; Chowdhury, S. Normally off Trench CAVET with Active Mg-Doped GaN as Current Blocking Layer. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 805–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, W.; Li, J.; Liao, Z.; Lin, F.; Wu, J.; Wang, B.; Wang, M.; Liu, N.; Chiu, H.C.; Kuo, H.C.; et al. 1.3 KV Vertical GaN-Based Trench MOSFETs on 4-Inch Free Standing GaN Wafer. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2022, 17, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Subramani, N.K.; Couvidat, J.; Hajjar, A.A.; Nallatamby, J.C.; Quéré, R. Low-Frequency Drain Noise Characterization and TCAD Physical Simulations of GaN HEMTs: Identification and Analysis of Physical Location of Traps. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2018, 39, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fu, H.; Fu, K.; Yang, C.; Liu, H.; Hatch, K.A.; Peri, P.; Herath Mudiyanselage, D.; Li, B.; Kim, T.H.; Alugubelli, S.R.; et al. Selective Area Regrowth and Doping for Vertical Gallium Nitride Power Devices: Materials Challenges and Recent Progress. Mater. Today 2021, 49, 296–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Koblmuller, G.; Chu, R.M.; Raman, A.; Mishra, U.K.; Speck, J.S. High-Temperature Molecular Beam Epitaxial Growth of AlGaN/GaN on GaN Templates with Reduced Interface Impurity Levels. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 043527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. King, S.W.; Barnak, J.P.; Bremser, M.D.; Tracy, K.M.; Ronning, C.; Davis, R.F.; Nemanich, R.J. Cleaning of AlN and GaN Surfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 1998, 84, 5248–5260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, W.; Nomoto, K.; Lee, K.; Islam, S.; Hu, Z.; Zhu, M.; Gao, X.; Pilla, M.; Jena, D.; Xing, H.G. Development of GaN Vertical Trench-MOSFET with MBE Regrown Channel. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 2558–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ji, D.; Gupta, C.; Agarwal, A.; Chan, S.H.; Lund, C.; Li, W.; Keller, S.; Mishra, U.K.; Chowdhury, S. Large-Area In-Situ Oxide, GaN Interlayer-Based Vertical Trench MOSFET (OG-FET). IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2018, 39, 711–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Strempel, K.; Römer, F.; Yu, F.; Meneghini, M.; Bakin, A.; Wehmann, H.H.; Witzigmann, B.; Waag, A. Vertical 3D Gallium Nitride Field-Effect Transistors Based on Fin Structures with Inverted p-Doped Channel. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2020, 36, 014002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, M.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, X.; Palacios, T. High-Performance GaN Vertical Fin Power Transistors on Bulk GaN Substrates. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2017, 38, 509–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maes, W.; de Meyer, K.; van Overstraeten, R. Impact ionization in silicon: A review and update. Solid-State Electron. 1990, 33, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Grasser, T.; Kosina, H.; Heitzinger, C.; Selberherr, S. Accurate Impact Ionization Model Which Accounts for Hot and Cold Carrier Populations. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 613–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jin, Y.-K.; Chiang, H.-Y.; Lin, K.-H.; Lee, C.-A.; Huang, J. Luminescence Efficiency Improvement of Small-Size Micro Light-Emitting Diodes by Digital Etching Technology. Opt. Lett. 2022, 47, 6277–6280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Device structure of the proposed staircase channel transistor. Comparison of current density distributions in traditional straight channel (b), multi-stage staircase channel (c), and staircase channel (d) transistors. (eg) Comparison of Electric field profiles of the traditional straight channel, multi-stage staircase channel, and staircase channel transistors respectively.
Figure 1. (a) Device structure of the proposed staircase channel transistor. Comparison of current density distributions in traditional straight channel (b), multi-stage staircase channel (c), and staircase channel (d) transistors. (eg) Comparison of Electric field profiles of the traditional straight channel, multi-stage staircase channel, and staircase channel transistors respectively.
Materials 16 00582 g001
Figure 2. Transfer characteristics of the devices (a) Transfer curves of different types of vertical transistors with the same layer thickness and doping concentration. (b) Transfer curves of the staircase channel transistor at various np. (c) Variation of transfer curves of the staircase channel transistor with ndrift. For (ac), the drain voltage for demonstrating transfer curves is 5V. (d) Variations of threshold voltage to the lateral dielectric layer (staircase) thickness.
Figure 2. Transfer characteristics of the devices (a) Transfer curves of different types of vertical transistors with the same layer thickness and doping concentration. (b) Transfer curves of the staircase channel transistor at various np. (c) Variation of transfer curves of the staircase channel transistor with ndrift. For (ac), the drain voltage for demonstrating transfer curves is 5V. (d) Variations of threshold voltage to the lateral dielectric layer (staircase) thickness.
Materials 16 00582 g002
Figure 3. (a) Output characteristics of the straight channel trench channel transistor. (b) Output characteristics of the multi-stage channel transistor. (c) Output characteristics of the staircase channel transistor. (d) Comparisons of breakdown characteristics of the straight channel trench gate, multi-stage staircase and staircase channel transistors, where the layer thickness and corresponding doping concentration are kept the same for all structures.
Figure 3. (a) Output characteristics of the straight channel trench channel transistor. (b) Output characteristics of the multi-stage channel transistor. (c) Output characteristics of the staircase channel transistor. (d) Comparisons of breakdown characteristics of the straight channel trench gate, multi-stage staircase and staircase channel transistors, where the layer thickness and corresponding doping concentration are kept the same for all structures.
Materials 16 00582 g003
Figure 4. (a) Variation of channel potential of the staircase channel transistor.; (b) Generation rate of charge carriers by impact ionization.
Figure 4. (a) Variation of channel potential of the staircase channel transistor.; (b) Generation rate of charge carriers by impact ionization.
Materials 16 00582 g004
Figure 5. Optimization of Vbr with various parameters: (a) drift length (Ldrift), (b) Drift doping concentration (ndrift), with constant np, Lp and Ldrift at 2 × 1017 cm−3, 400 nm and 12 µm respectively.
Figure 5. Optimization of Vbr with various parameters: (a) drift length (Ldrift), (b) Drift doping concentration (ndrift), with constant np, Lp and Ldrift at 2 × 1017 cm−3, 400 nm and 12 µm respectively.
Materials 16 00582 g005
Figure 6. Optimization of Vbr with respect to (a) p-doping concentration (np) and (b) P-layer thickness (Lp).
Figure 6. Optimization of Vbr with respect to (a) p-doping concentration (np) and (b) P-layer thickness (Lp).
Materials 16 00582 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barman, K.; Lin, D.-J.; Gupta, R.; Chang, C.-K.; Huang, J.-J. GaN Vertical Transistors with Staircase Channels for High-Voltage Applications. Materials 2023, 16, 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020582

AMA Style

Barman K, Lin D-J, Gupta R, Chang C-K, Huang J-J. GaN Vertical Transistors with Staircase Channels for High-Voltage Applications. Materials. 2023; 16(2):582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020582

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barman, Kuntal, Dai-Jie Lin, Rohit Gupta, Chih-Kang Chang, and Jian-Jang Huang. 2023. "GaN Vertical Transistors with Staircase Channels for High-Voltage Applications" Materials 16, no. 2: 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020582

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop