Next Article in Journal
Hot Cracking Behaviors of Mg-Zn-Er Alloys with Different Er Contents
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical Analysis on Fatigue Crack Growth at Negative and Positive Stress Ratios
Previous Article in Journal
Tool Wear Mechanism and Grinding Performance for Different Cooling-Lubrication Modes in Grinding of Nickel-Based Superalloys
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental and Numerical Study on the Influence of Lubrication Conditions on AA6068 Aluminum Alloy Cold Deformation Behavior
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Direct Energy Deposition Parametric Simulation Investigation in Gear Repair Applications

Materials 2023, 16(9), 3549; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093549
by Nuno Miguel Ferreira 1,2, Maria Vila Pouca 1,2, Carlos Fernandes 1,2, Jorge Seabra 1,2, Grzegorz Lesiuk 3, Marco Parente 1,2,* and Abílio Jesus 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Materials 2023, 16(9), 3549; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093549
Submission received: 22 March 2023 / Revised: 13 April 2023 / Accepted: 27 April 2023 / Published: 5 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metals Processing, Finite Element Analysis and Fatigue Design)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The study conducted aims to predict the tensions and distortions imposed in the gear repair process by directed energy deposition. The study is well organized and somewhat innovative, but still needs to be explained in the following areas:

(1)    The introduction of the experimental equipment is not sufficient. The parameters and pictures of related equipment and instruments need to be supplemented.

(2)    How are the results of the experiments measured using the sensors? Can refer to: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108386 and 10.1109/TAES.2023.3257777.

(3)    Why is the finite element model in Figure 10 not considered to be cyclically symmetrical? Because discretization of all geometric models does not guarantee a completely consistent mesh shape for each sub-model.

(4)    Is the thermal-mechanical coupling study in this manuscript only simulation?

(5)    The latest research progress on the temperature field needs to be supplemented: 10.1016/j.ast.2023.108155.

(6)    F10 and F40 do not use the same set of finite element meshes, why?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Enclosed as a separate file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

good job

Reviewer 2 Report

Now the manuscript can be accepted for the publication.

Back to TopTop