Next Article in Journal
Frictional Properties of Soaps with the Addition of Ground Hazelnut Shells
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of AWJ Process Parameters on Erosion Groove Formation in Additively Manufactured Stainless Steel
Previous Article in Special Issue
Determination of Fluorine by Ion-Selective Electrode and High-Resolution Continuum Source Graphite Furnace Molecular Absorption Spectrometry with Respect to Animal Feed Safety
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Recovery of Metal Ions (Cd2+, Co2+, and Ni2+) from Nitrate and Sulfate on Laser-Induced Graphene Film Using Applied Voltage and Its Application

1
State Key Laboratory of Mountain Bridge and Tunnel Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
2
School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
3
College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(12), 2965; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17122965
Submission received: 18 April 2024 / Revised: 14 June 2024 / Accepted: 14 June 2024 / Published: 17 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrochemical Material Science and Electrode Processes)

Abstract

:
The urgent removal of Cd, Co, and Ni from nitrate and sulfate is essential to mitigate the potential risk of chemical pollution from large volumes of industrial wastewater. In this study, these metal ions were rapidly recovered through applying voltage on nitrate and sulfate, utilizing laser-induced graphene/polyimide (LIG/PI) film as the electrode. Following the application of external voltage, both the pH value and conductivity of the solution undergo changes. Compared to Co2+ and Ni2+, Cd2+ exhibits a lower standard electrode potential and stronger reducibility. Consequently, in both nitrate and sulfate solutions, the reaction sequence follows the order of Cd2+ > Co2+ > Ni2+, with the corresponding electrode adsorption quantities in the order of Cd2+ > Co2+ ~ Ni2+. Additionally, using the recovered Co(OH)2 as the raw material, a LiCoO2 composite was prepared. The assembled battery with this composite exhibited a specific capacity of 122.8 mAh g−1, meeting practical application requirements. This research has significance for fostering green development.

1. Introduction

Large amounts of residual metal ions remain in industrial wastewater. Once metal ions contaminate water or soil, they pollute the environment and affect people’s health [1]. Therefore, an efficient and environmentally friendly disposal method for treating polluted waterbodies is an urgent issue.
Researchers have employed various methods to recover valuable metal ions from waste batteries, including leaching, chemical reduction, metallurgy, and other techniques [2,3,4,5]. Meshram et al. [6] reviewed the recovery of metals using various acids, which unfortunately led to secondary pollution caused by the chemical agents. In recent decades, electrosorption or capacitive deionization (CDI), which rapidly pushes the migration of ionics using electrical force, has been widely utilized for the recovery of metal ions in wastewater due to its low cost, ease of control, and absence of secondary pollution from the chemical agents [7,8,9]. The adsorption electrode serves as the central component of the electric deionization device, playing a pivotal role in determining the device’s adsorption capacity [8,10]. Electrode materials featuring a carbon network structure have been extensively researched due to their high specific surface area, well-balanced pore size distribution, exceptional electrical conductivity, and favorable adsorption properties [9,11,12,13]. Li et al. [14] reported on the removal of Ni2+ ions using an α-MnO2/carbon fiber paper composite, which exhibited pseudocapacitor properties, facilitating electron/charge transfer. Xue et al. developed a nitric acid-modified activated carbon electrode for the removal of Co2+, Mn2+, and Ni2+ ions [15]. Coconut-shell activated carbon, activated by CO2, served as the electrode, demonstrating a Ni removal capacity of 5.32 mg g−1 [16]. This implies that modifying carbon materials with various functional groups can effectively be used to adsorb metal ions.
Laser-induced graphene (LIG), as an easily obtainable carbon material, has been utilized across various fields due to its high thermal stability, excellent conductivity, rich 3D porous network, and abundant functional groups [17]. In our previous research, employing LIG as an electrode material exhibited outstanding capability in recovering rare earth ions [18]. Li et al. reported that a Co4S3 modified LIG electrode exhibited a high adsorption capacity of 2702.79 mg g−1 for UO22+ [19], indicating its potential as an absorbent electrode.
To our knowledge, the use of LIG films as electrodes for recovering Cd2+, Co2+, and Ni2+ ions has not been reported previously. Therefore, the recovery of Cd2+, Co2+, and Ni2+ ions in nitrate and sulfate forms was investigated in this work. The standard potential of Cd (Eθ = −0.403 V vs. SHE) is lower than that of Co (Eθ = −0.277 V vs. SHE) and Ni (Eθ = −0.257 V vs. SHE), indicating the easy recovery of cadmium ions under identical solution concentrations. Due to the superior oxidation capabilities of nitrate ions, the ions recovered from nitrate solutions are mainly hydroxides, whereas the products recovered from sulphate solutions are metals. Furthermore, the cobalt hydroxide recovered could serve as a raw material for the preparation of lithium-ion electrode materials. This has significance for fostering green development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Characteristics

Co(NO3)2, Ni(NO3)2, Cd(NO3)2, CoSO4, NiSO4, and CdSO4 were procured from Sinopharm Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China. A 100 μm polyimide (PI) film was supplied by Texiang Electrical Insulation Material Company, PRC, Tianjin. Ethanol was purchased from Chongqing Colon Chemical Co., Ltd., Chongqing, China. Deionized water specifically prepared for laboratory use was employed. The aforementioned chemicals are of analytical purity and were used without any further treatment.
The structure and morphology of the product were characterized using X-ray diffractometry (XRD, SmartLab, Shanghai, China) and field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan). The bonds in the sample were analyzed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Thermo Scientific, Suzhou, China) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Fisher Scientific Escalab QXi, Waltham, America). The pH of the solution was determined using a PHS-3C pH acidity meter. The concentration of ions in solution during the application of external voltage was measured using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS, TAS-990 SUPER, Weizhou, China). The electrochemical performance of the electrode was carried out using VMP3 multi-channel electrochemical impedance system.

2.2. Preparation of LIG/PI Film Electrodes via Laser Scribing

Firstly, commercial PI films were cleaned with ethanol and deionized water. Subsequently, a 100 μm thick PI film was affixed to a glass plate, and a CO2 laser with a wavelength of 10.6 μm was utilized to carve the PI film, resulting in the production of an LIG/PI film electrode. The scanning speed and scanning power of the laser engraving machine were 100 mm/s and 6.6 W, respectively. Finally, an LIG/PI thin film electrode with a size of 2.5 × 1 cm2 was obtained. Figure 1a shows the preparation process of the LIG/PI thin film electrode.
In this experiment, a traditional three-electrode system (Figure 1b) was employed to the simulated solutions containing 0.005–0.02 M Co2+, Ni2+, and Cd2+. The LIG/PI film served as the working electrode, while a Pt electrode was utilized as the counter electrode. An Ag-AgCl electrode was employed as the reference electrode. Upon applying a voltage to the reference electrode, the ions were recovered. The formulas for calculating the adsorption capacity (Q) and removal rate (W) are provided in detail in the Supplementary Materials.

2.3. Application of Recovered Co(OH)2

LiCoO2 was prepared using the sol-gel method. First, the recovered Co(OH)2 and citric acid in a stoichiometric ratio of 1:2 were dissolved in 50 mL distilled water; then, the mixture was heated in an oil bath for 1 h at 80 °C with stirring. A certain amount of LiOH was added; meanwhile, an ammonia solution was used to adjust the pH of solution. The mixture was dried at 120 °C to evaporate the water. Finally, it was annealed at 800 °C for 8 h to obtain LiCoO2.
A slurry was prepared by mixing LiCoO2 (80 wt%), Super P (10 wt%), and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF, 10 wt%) in N-methyl-pyrrolidone (NMP). Subsequently, the half-cell was assembled and measured following the procedures outlined in previous studies [1].

3. Results

3.1. Change in pH and Conductivity after Applying the External Potential

Figure 2 illustrates the changes in pH and conductivity following the application of an external potential to a 0.02 M solution of Cd(NO3)2, Co(NO3)2, and Ni(NO3)2. When applying a potential of −1.2 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) to a 0.02 M solution of Cd(NO3)2, a silver-white product was obtained (inset of Figure 2a). In the Co(NO3)2 solution, both a gray product and a light blue product were obtained (inset of Figure 2b). And a green product was observed in the Ni(NO3)2 solution (inset of Figure 2c). Correspondingly, the pH decreased from ~6.0 to ~2.5, and the conductivity increased from ~2.0 to ~2.9 in these solutions. After the potential became −1.5 V, different color products were obtained, as shown in the inset of Figure S1. This illustrated a difference in the composition of products. Herein, a more obvious change in the pH and conductivity was detected. A higher applied voltage implies a strong electric driving force, which effectively influences the mobility of Co2+, Ni2+, and Cd2+ ions.
When applying a potential of −1.2 V to the sulfate solutions (Figure 2d–f), the variation in the pH and conductivity was notably significant in the CdSO4 solution (ΔpH = 3.78, Δσ = 3.97 mS cm1). However, it was relatively small in CoSO4 (ΔpH = 3.04, Δσ = 0.96 mS cm1) and NiSO4(ΔpH = 2.43, Δσ = 0.47 mS cm1). Changing the potential to −1.5 V (Figure S1d–f) resulted in a dramatic change in pH (ΔpH = 4) and conductivity (Δσ = 8 mS cm1) observed in the CdSO4 solution. It was smallest in the NiSO4 solution (ΔpH = 3, Δσ = 2 mS cm1). These results illustrate that the reaction kinetics in sulfate and nitrate are different. The reaction ability in this solution follows the order of Cd2+ > Co2+ > Ni2+ under these conditions, disregarding the effect of anions.

3.2. Analysis of the Adsorption Product

The product compositions obtained on electrode surfaces after application of −1.2 V voltage in nitrate and sulfate solutions was determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, as depicted in Figure 3. It can be observed that the sharp and strong peaks at 2θ = 18.7, 29.5, 35.1, and 59.7° belonged to Cd(OH)2 (JCPDS 31-0228) and the peaks at 2θ = 19.1, 32.5, 37.9, and 51.4° were identified as well-crystallized Co(OH)2 (JCPDS 30-0443) in nitrates [20,21]. However, the peaks around 2θ = 33.5, 38.5, and 59.7° were broad and poor, indicating the formation of amorphous Ni(OH)2/NiOOH (JCPDS 38-0715). The SEM further revealed that irregular blocks of Cd(OH)2 formed due to the rapid reaction (Figure 4a). A sheet-like structure of Co(OH)2 (Figure 4b) and an irregular rod-like shape of Ni(OH)2/NiOOH (Figure 4c) were generated, with the particles aggregating to form blocks. However, the adsorption products in the sulfate solutions consisted of metallic Cd (JCPDS 85-1328), Co (JCPDS 05-0727), and Ni (JCPDS 87-0712). Among them, metallic Cd and Co exhibited dendritic morphology, as depicted in Figure 4d,e. The morphology of Ni appeared as irregular spherical shapes (Figure 4f).
When the voltage was −1.5 V, hydroxides could be obtained in these nitrates (Figure S2). However, the morphology of the Cd(OH)2, Ni(OH)2/NiOOH and Co(OH)2 obviously changed (Figure S3). Although no change in the adsorbed products was detected from the XRD profiles in sulfate solution, the dendritic crystal became more obvious (Figure S4).
The chemical state of the product on the surface of the LIG film was analyzed using XPS, as shown in Figure 5. All XPS data were calibrated and fitted using PeakFit software 4.12. In the fitted spectra of products in Cd(NO3)2 solution (Figure 4a), two characteristic peaks were observed at 405.3 eV (Cd 3d5/2) and 412.11 eV (Cd 3d3/2), indicative of Cd2+ in Cd(OH)2 [22]. The position of the fitted peak in the Cd 3d spectrum of CdSO4 was identical to that of Cd(NO3)2, as zero-valent cadmium exhibits no characteristic peak. The results of XRD show that the adsorbed product of CdSO4 is Cd. This illustrates that besides the metallic Cd, trace of hydroxide existed. In the Co(NO3)2 solution, the peaks observed at 781.44 and 797.29 eV corresponded to Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2 in Co(OH)2, respectively [23]. The satellite peaks at 787.18 and 803.54 eV, respectively, corresponded to the high spin state of Co2+ [24]. The fitting of the Co 2p spectra from CoSO4 (Figure 5e) exhibited significant differences compared to that from Co(NO3)2. Herein, characteristic peaks emerge at 778.1, 781.1, and 783.1 eV, respectively, corresponding to metallic Co [25]. The Ni 2p spectrum in Ni(NO3)2 was fitted with six characteristic peaks located at 854.8, 855.7, 857.7, 860.1, 861.5 and 866.5 eV, respectively. This indicates that the product is Ni(OH)2 or NiOOH, aligning with the reports in the literature [26]. The characteristic peaks of the Ni 2p spectra from NiSO4 (Figure 5f) were observed at 852.9, 856.4 and 859.2 eV, respectively, corresponding to metallic Ni.

3.3. Electrochemical Properties

Figure 6 illustrates the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of the LIG/PI thin film electrode under different scan rates in various nitrate and sulfate solutions. At scan rates of 5 to 20 mV s−1 in the Cd(NO3)2 solution, a quasi-rectangular shape was observed, illustrating stable capacitance behavior without a redox reaction. However, an oxidation peak appeared in CdSO4, indicating the possible decomposition of water. No obvious reduction peak from Cd2+ to Cd was detected due to the rapid scan. An obvious difference in Co(NO3)2 and CoSO4 was detected; however, a slight difference was observed in Ni(NO3)2 and NiSO4. Because the applied potential was higher (−1.2 V), both H+ and H2O participated in the reaction, reducing the pH of the solutions and increasing the conductivity.
After applying a potential of −1.2 V, the current density remained stable in the nitrate solution (Figure 7a). At the moment the voltage was applied, the current density surged in the nitrate solutions. Afterward, the current density decreased and stabilized. The stable current density values were approximately 1.5 mA cm2 in the Co(NO3)2 solution, 2 mA cm2 in the Ni(NO3)2 solution, and 4 mA cm2 in the Cd(NO3)2 solution, respectively. Combining the changes in pH and conductivity, water decomposition occurred, and the generated H+ ions compensated for the adsorption of the Cd2+, Co2+, and Ni2+ ions, thereby ensuring that the mobility of the ions in the nitrate salt solutions remained unchanged. The current density was relatively stable in the NiSO4 (approximately 1.3 mA cm2) and CoSO4 solution (approximately 2.3 mA cm2). However, the current density in CdSO4 rapidly and linearly increased over time. This further illustrates that the stable reduction reaction in NiSO4 and CoSO4 was supported by the generated H+ ions. In addition, the reduction of Cd2+ ions was dramatically affected by the polarization.
When the voltage was −1.5 V, the current density exhibited changes as depicted in Figure S5. Except for CdSO4 and CoSO4, the current density changes in other solutions were consistent with the changes observed at −1.2 V, wherein the current density initially increased sharply before decreasing and ultimately stabilizing. The change was more pronounced in the CdSO4 solution, with a current density of 20 mA cm2 at −1.2 V and 45 mA cm2 at −1.5 V at 1200 s, respectively. In the CoSO4 solution, the current density did not remain stable but instead increased with time.

3.4. Adsorption Capacity

The adsorption amount of metal ions was measured using an atomic absorption spectrometer to evaluate the adsorption capability of the LIG/PI membrane electrode towards metal ions. We calculated Q and W using Formulas (1) and (2) (Supplementary Materials). The standard curves for different metal ions are depicted in Figure S6, while Figure 8 illustrates the temporal changes in the adsorption capacity. It was evident that with the increasing concentration, the adsorption capacity also increased. The adsorption capacity in Cd(NO3)2 increased from 913.5 mg g1 at 0.005 M to 3479.8 mg g1 at 0.02 M. Approximately 39% of Cd2+ ions were adsorbed on the electrode surface in 0.02M Cd(NO3)2 over 300 min. The adsorption capacity of 1381.5 mg g1 in 0.02 M Co(NO3)2 solution was slightly lower than that of 1448.7 mg g1 in Ni(NO3)2 solution. The adsorption capacity in the 0.005 M CdSO4 solution reached 2634.27 mg g1, indicating the easy migration of Cd2+ and its reduction in the sulfate solution. Moreover, the adsorption capacity of 0.02 M CoSO4 and NiSO4 was also higher than that in the nitric acid solution. However, the recovery capability at a low concentration of CoSO4 and NiSO4 was similar. In sulfuric acid solution, the adsorption capacity followed the order of Cd 2+ > Co 2+ > Ni2+.
As the voltage was −1.5 V, the adsorption capacity also changed, as depicted in Figure S7. Approximately 40% Ni2+ in Ni(NO3)2 was covered in 100 min; then, the adsorption showed no obvious change due to the occupation of the active sites. It showed a faster adsorption with a longer adsorption time in Cd(NO3)2 than in Co(NO3)2. The recovery of Cd2+, Ni2+, and Co2+ was lower than approximately 20% when the concentration was 0.002 M. The recovery efficiency in the 0.002 M CoSO4 solution remained approximately 10%, while it increased in the NiSO4 and CdSO4 solution.
The recycling stability of the LIG electrode was one of the important factors for application. After the product was collected, which involved soaking in 5% nitric acid for 1 h, the electrode was washed with deionized water and then dried at 30 °C. The conductivities in this solution were stable in five adsorptions–desorption cycles, indicating that the LIG film possesses regenerative properties, as shown in Figure 9.

3.5. Reaction Mechanism

In nitrate, NO3− ions migrate towards the counter electrode after the application of voltage, where they may acquire electrons and undergo reduction to form NO2− ions (Equation (1)). Meanwhile, reaction Equation (2) occurs, generating H+ ions and reducing the pH of these solutions. Correspondingly, metallic ions swiftly migrate towards and combine with hydroxyl and carboxyl groups on the surface of the LIG film. Moreover, the generated OH ions further combine with metal ions to facilitate the formation of hydroxide precipitates (Equation (3)). However, water is decomposed in sulfates, and the acidic condition accelerates the reduction to form the corresponding metals (Equation (4)).
NO3− + H2O + 2e → NO2 + 2OH E = 0.93 V vs. SHE
2H2O + 4e → O2 + 4H+
M2+ + 2OH → M(OH)2
M2+ + 2e → M

3.6. Application of the Product

Taking recycled cobalt as an example, the investigation focused on the reutilization of the recovered product. The obtained Co(OH)2 served as the raw material for preparing LiCoO2. The CV curves (Figure 10) displayed a distinct redox peak at 4.1/3.7 V, corresponding to the insertion/extraction of Li. The specific capacity reached 122.8 mAh g1 at a current density of 0.5 C, highly consistent with the reported data from commercially prepared materials [27]. The initial discharge capacity exhibited no significant change at a current density of 1 C. However, it rapidly decreased with increasing cycles, a phenomenon attributed to the particle size of the LiCoO2. In summary, the products recovered through this method also hold potential application value in other fields.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the transition metal ions, Co2+, Cd2+, and Ni2+, were recovered using LIG/PI thin films as the working electrodes through electrosorption and electrodeposition methods in nitrate and sulfate solutions, respectively. In nitrate and sulfate solutions, the LIG/PI electrode surface was found to accumulate hydroxides and dendritic metal deposits, respectively. After applying an external voltage, the pH of the solution decreased, while the conductivity increased. Compared to Co2+ and Ni2+, Cd2+ exhibited a lower standard electrode potential and stronger reducibility. Consequently, in both nitrate and sulfate solutions, the reaction sequence followed the order of Cd2+ > Co2+ > Ni2+, with the corresponding electrode adsorption quantities in the order of Cd2+ > Co2+ ~ Ni2+ in 0.005 to 0.02 M. Additionally, using the recovered Co(OH)2 as raw material, a LiCoO2 composite was prepared. The assembled battery with this composite exhibited a specific capacity of 122.8 mAh g−1, meeting practical application requirements. This has significance for fostering green development.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma17122965/s1, Figure S1. Changes in pH and conductivity during the electro adsorption process (−1.5 V). (a) Cd(NO3)2, (b) Ni(NO3)2, (c) Co(NO3)2, (d) CdSO4, (e) NiSO4, and (f) CoSO4. Figure S2. XRD pattern of electrode surface products in (a) nitric acid and (b) sulfate solutions with a voltage of −1.5 V. Figure S3. SEM of the product in (a,b) Co(NO3)2, (c,d) Ni(NO3)2, (e,f) Cd(NO3)2 solution (−1.5 V). Figure S4. SEM of the product in (a–c) CoSO4, (d–f) CdSO4, and (g–i) NiSO4 solution (−1.5 V). Figure S5. Current changes in nitrate solution and sulfate solution (−1.5 V). Figure S6. Standard Curve of (a) Cd(NO3)2, (b) Co(NO3)2, (c) Ni(NO3)2 solution (−1.2 V). Figure S7. Standard Curves of (a) Co(NO3)2, (b) Cd(NO3)2, (c) Ni(NO3)2 solution (−1.5 V), (d,e) Change in adsorption capacity over time at different concentrations, (f,g) Change in removal rate over time.

Author Contributions

X.-m.W. and T.S. are responsible for the experiment planning, directing the research content, and writing this paper. Y.C. is responsible for some experiments and data sorting. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, Y.; Kang, Y.; Fan, M.; Li, T.; Wozny, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, X.; Chueh, Y.-L.; Liang, Z.; Zhou, G.; et al. Precise separation of spent lithium ion cells in water without discharging for recycling. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 45, 1092–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhou, L.; Yang, D.; Du, T.; Gong, H.; Luo, W. The current process for the recycling of spent lithium ion batteries. Front. Chem. 2021, 8, 578044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Windisch-Kern, S.; Li, B.; Li, J.; Xu, Z. Pyrometallurgical technology in the recycling of a spent lithium ion battery: Evolution and the challenge. Processes 2021, 1, 1369–1382. [Google Scholar]
  4. Du, K.D.; Ang, E.H.; Wu, X.L.; Liu, Y.C. Progresses in sustainable recycling technology of spent lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Mater. 2022, 5, 1012–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gong, R.; Li, C.C.; Meng, Q.; Dong, P.; Zhang, Y.J.; Zhang, B.; Yan, J.; Li, Y. A sustainable closed-loop method of selective oxidation leaching and regeneration for lithium iron phosphate cathode materials from spent batteries. J. Environ. Manage. 2022, 319, 115740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sankar, T.K.; Abhilash; Meshram, P. Environmental impact assessment in the entire life cycle of lithium-ioin batteries. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2024, 262, 5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, Y.; Deng, Y.Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, H. Overview of recent developments of resource recovery from wastewater via electrochemistry-based technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 757, 143901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yang, L.M.; Hu, W.B.; Chang, Z.; Liu, T.; Fang, D.F.; Shao, P.H.; Shi, H.; Luo, X.B. Electrochemical recovery and high value-added reutilization of heavy metal ions from wastewater: Recent advances and future trends. Environ. Int. 2021, 152, 106512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mousset, E.; Fournier, M.; Su, X. Recent advances of reactive electroseparation systems for water treatment and selective resource recovery. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2023, 42, 101384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, L.; Sheng, L.; Wan, K.L.; Wang, M.C.; Zhang, H.G.; Yan, J.; Liu, Y.H.; Alhassan, S.I.; Chen, Y.S.; Arulmani, S.R.B. The diversified mechanism of adsorption and electro-adsorption technologies by using Ti3AlC2 for removing fluoride. Desalination 2024, 578, 117449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shin, J.; Lee, G.; Choi, M.; Jang, H.; Lim, Y.; Kim, G.S.; Nam, S.H.; Baek, S.H.; Song, H.C.; Kim, J.; et al. Atomically mixed catalysts on a 3D thin-shell TiO2 for dual-modal chemical detection and neutralization. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 18195–18206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, X.M.; Chai, Y.J.; Wang, Z.P.; Yu, J.B.; Chen, X.P. A linear and large-range pressure sensor based on hierarchical structural SnO2@carbon nanotubes/polyurethane sponge. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 30579–30585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kwak, D.; Kim, H.; Jang, S.; Kim, B.G.; Cho, D.; Chang, H.; Lee, J.O. Investigation of laser-induced graphene (LIG) on a flexible substrate and its functionalization by metal doping for gas-sensing applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, P.J.; Gui, Y.; Blackwood, D.J. Development of a nanostructured α-MnO2/carbon paper composite for removal of Ni2+/Mn2+ ions by electrosorption. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 19615–19625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xue, Y.; Cheng, W.T.; Cao, M.; Gao, J.Z.; Chen, J.Q.; Gui, Y.Y.; Zhu, W.M.; Ma, F.Q. Development of nitric acid-modified activated carbon electrode for removal of Co2+/Mn2+/Ni+ by electrosorption. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 77536–77552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huynh, L.T.N.; Tran, T.N.; Ho, T.T.N.; Le, X.H.; Le, V.H.; Nguyen, T.H. Enhanced electrosorption of NaCl and nickel(II) in capacitive deionization by CO2 activation coconut-shell activated carbon. Carbon Lett. 2022, 32, 1531–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, C.; Wu, T.; Hsu, P.C.; Xie, J.; Zhao, J.; Liu, K.; Sun, J.; Xu, J.W.; Tang, J.; Ye, Z.W.; et al. Direct/alternating current electrochemical method for removing and recovering heavy metal from water using graphene oxide electrode. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 6431–6437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, L.; Gao, Y.; Wang, X.M.; Chai, Y.J.; Sun, X.Q. Efficient and sustainable electro-sorption of rare earth by laser-induced graphene film. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 300, 121853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cao, R.Y.; Zhang, J.F.; Wang, D.; Sun, F.W.; Li, N.; Li, J.X. Electrodeposition cobalt sulfide nanosheet on laser-induced graphene as capacitive deionization electrodes for uranium adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 461, 142080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sakthivel, M.; Sivakumar, M.; Chen, S.M.; Hou, Y.S.; Veeramani, V.; Madhu, R.; Miyamoto, N. A facile synthesis of Cd(OH)2-rGO nanocomposites for the practical electrochemical detection of acetaminophen. Electroanalysis 2017, 29, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maile, N.C.; Shinde, S.K.; Koli, R.R.; Fulari, A.V.; Kim, D.Y.; Fulari, V.J. Effect of different electrolytes and deposition time on the supercapacitor properties of nanoflake-like Co(OH)2 electrodes. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 51, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ren, J.J.; Zheng, L.C.; Su, Y.M.; Meng, P.P.; Zhou, Q.Y.; Zeng, H.; Zhang, T.; Yu, H.J. Competitive adsorption of Cd(II), Pb(II) and Cu(II) ions from acid mine drainage with zero-valent iron/phosphoric titanium dioxide: XPS qualitative analyses and DFT quantitative calculations. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 445, 136778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, R.F.; Deng, L.G.; Fan, X.J.; Li, K.; Lu, H.Q.; Li, W. Removal of heavy metal ion cobalt (II) from wastewater via adsorption method using microcrystalline cellulose–magnesium hydroxide. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 189, 607–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rohit, R.C.; Jenifer, A.; Jagadale, A.D.; Kumbhar, V.S.; Lee, H.; Lee, K. Facile synthesis of Ce-doped α-cobalt hydroxide nanoflakes battery type electrode with an enhanced capacitive contribution for asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 2020, 28, 101227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mark, C.; Biesinger, B.P.; Payne, A.P.; Grosvenor, L.W.M.; Lau, A.R.; Gerson, R.S.C. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 2717–2730. [Google Scholar]
  26. Altamirano-Garcia, L.; Vazquez-Arenas, J.; Pritzker, M.; Luna-Sánchez, R.; Cabrera-Sierra, R. Effects of saccharin and anions (SO42−, Cl) on the electrodeposition of Co-Ni alloys. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2015, 19, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, H.L.; Wang, F.; Shen, M.H.; Tong, Y.; Wang, H.X.; Hu, H.L. Advances of LiCoO2 in cathode of aqueous lithium-Ion batteries. Small Methods 2023, 2300820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the fabrication of LIG/PI film electrodes. (b) Schematic diagram of the three-electrode system.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the fabrication of LIG/PI film electrodes. (b) Schematic diagram of the three-electrode system.
Materials 17 02965 g001
Figure 2. Changes in pH and conductivity after applying the potential (−1.2 V). (a) Cd(NO3)2, (b) Co(NO3)2, (c) Ni(NO3)2, (d) CdSO4, (e) CoSO4, (f) NiSO4.
Figure 2. Changes in pH and conductivity after applying the potential (−1.2 V). (a) Cd(NO3)2, (b) Co(NO3)2, (c) Ni(NO3)2, (d) CdSO4, (e) CoSO4, (f) NiSO4.
Materials 17 02965 g002
Figure 3. XRD pattern of electrode surface products in (a) nitric acid and (b) sulfate solutions with a voltage of −1.2 V.
Figure 3. XRD pattern of electrode surface products in (a) nitric acid and (b) sulfate solutions with a voltage of −1.2 V.
Materials 17 02965 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of the products in (a) Cd(NO3)2, (b) Co(NO3)2, (c) Ni(NO3)2, (d) CdSO4, (e) CoSO4 and (f) NiSO4.
Figure 4. SEM images of the products in (a) Cd(NO3)2, (b) Co(NO3)2, (c) Ni(NO3)2, (d) CdSO4, (e) CoSO4 and (f) NiSO4.
Materials 17 02965 g004
Figure 5. XPS the of product in (a) Cd(NO3)2, (b) Co(NO3)2, (c) Ni(NO3)2, (d) CdSO4, (e) CoSO4, and (f) NiSO4.
Figure 5. XPS the of product in (a) Cd(NO3)2, (b) Co(NO3)2, (c) Ni(NO3)2, (d) CdSO4, (e) CoSO4, and (f) NiSO4.
Materials 17 02965 g005
Figure 6. The CV curves at different scan rates in nitrate and sulfate solutions of LIG/PI film electrodes. (a) Cd(NO3)2, (b) Co(NO3)2, (c) Ni(NO3)2, (d) CdSO4, (e) CoSO4 and (f) NiSO4.
Figure 6. The CV curves at different scan rates in nitrate and sulfate solutions of LIG/PI film electrodes. (a) Cd(NO3)2, (b) Co(NO3)2, (c) Ni(NO3)2, (d) CdSO4, (e) CoSO4 and (f) NiSO4.
Materials 17 02965 g006
Figure 7. Current changes in (a) nitrate solution and (b) sulfate solution (−1.2 V).
Figure 7. Current changes in (a) nitrate solution and (b) sulfate solution (−1.2 V).
Materials 17 02965 g007
Figure 8. Adsorption of metal ions at different concentrations of nitrate and sulfate (−1.2 V). (a) 0.02 M, (b) 0.01 M, and (c) 0.005 M.
Figure 8. Adsorption of metal ions at different concentrations of nitrate and sulfate (−1.2 V). (a) 0.02 M, (b) 0.01 M, and (c) 0.005 M.
Materials 17 02965 g008
Figure 9. Cyclic performance of the electrodes. (a) Cd(NO3)2, (b) Co(NO3)2, (c) Ni(NO3)2, (d) CdSO4, (e) CoSO4, (f) NiSO4.
Figure 9. Cyclic performance of the electrodes. (a) Cd(NO3)2, (b) Co(NO3)2, (c) Ni(NO3)2, (d) CdSO4, (e) CoSO4, (f) NiSO4.
Materials 17 02965 g009
Figure 10. (a) CV curve, (b) charging/discharging curves, and (c) cyclic stability at 0.5 C and 1 C.
Figure 10. (a) CV curve, (b) charging/discharging curves, and (c) cyclic stability at 0.5 C and 1 C.
Materials 17 02965 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.-m.; Su, T.; Chai, Y. Recovery of Metal Ions (Cd2+, Co2+, and Ni2+) from Nitrate and Sulfate on Laser-Induced Graphene Film Using Applied Voltage and Its Application. Materials 2024, 17, 2965. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17122965

AMA Style

Wang X-m, Su T, Chai Y. Recovery of Metal Ions (Cd2+, Co2+, and Ni2+) from Nitrate and Sulfate on Laser-Induced Graphene Film Using Applied Voltage and Its Application. Materials. 2024; 17(12):2965. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17122965

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xiu-man, Tong Su, and Yujun Chai. 2024. "Recovery of Metal Ions (Cd2+, Co2+, and Ni2+) from Nitrate and Sulfate on Laser-Induced Graphene Film Using Applied Voltage and Its Application" Materials 17, no. 12: 2965. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17122965

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop