Next Article in Journal
Deep-Learning-Based Segmentation of Keyhole in In-Situ X-ray Imaging of Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Next Article in Special Issue
Preparation of RDX/F2311/Fe2O3/Al Composite Hollow Microspheres by Electrospray and Synergistic Energy Release during Combustion between Components
Previous Article in Journal
A Superhydrophobic Surface on a Superalloy Substrate with Properties of High Mechanical Strength and Self-Cleaning of Carbon Deposition
Previous Article in Special Issue
Upcycling of Wood Dust from Particleboard Recycling as a Filler in Lignocellulosic Layered Composite Technology
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 17
Issue 2
10.3390/ma17020509
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Magnetic and Plasmonic Properties of Fe3O4-PEI-Au and Fe3O4-PEI-Ag Nanoparticles

by
Shuya Ning
1,2,
Shuo Wang
1,
Zhihui Liu
1,
Naming Zhang
3,*,
Bin Yang
3 and
Fanghui Zhang
1
1
School of Electronic Information and Artificial Intelligence, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710021, China
2
Key Laboratory of Photonics Technology for Information, School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(2), 509; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17020509
Submission received: 10 December 2023 / Revised: 17 January 2024 / Accepted: 18 January 2024 / Published: 21 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preparation and Characterization of Functional Composite Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Magnetic–plasmonic nanoparticles (NPs) have attracted great interest in many fields because they can exhibit more physical and chemical properties than individual magnetic or plasmonic NPs. In this work, we synthesized Au- or Ag-decorated Fe3O4 nanoparticles coated with PEI (Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs) using a simple method. The influences of the plasmonic metal NPs’ (Au or Ag) coating density on the magnetic and plasmonic properties of the Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs were investigated, and the density of the plasmonic metal NPs coated on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces could be adjusted by controlling the polyethyleneimine (PEI) concentration. It showed that the Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs exhibited both magnetic and plasmonic properties. When the PEI concentration increased from 5 to 35 mg/mL, the coating density of the Au or Ag NPs on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces increased, the corresponding magnetic intensity became weaker, and the plasmonic intensity was stronger. At the same time, the plasmonic resonance peak of the Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs was red shifted. Therefore, there was an optimal coverage of the plasmonic metal NPs on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces to balance the magnetic and plasmonic properties when the PEI concentration was between 15 and 25 mg/mL. This result can guide the application of the Fe3O4-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs in the biomedical field.

1. Introduction

At present, magnetic nanoparticles (NPs) have attracted great interest in many fields, such as bearing drugs [1,2], radionuclides [3,4], hyperthermia [5,6,7], active magnetic field targeting [8,9,10], protein purification [11,12,13], biosensors [14,15], and catalysis [16,17,18]. Researchers also further modify the surface of magnetic NPs with antibodies or proteins to expand their applications [19,20,21]. As such, Sohn et al. combined iron oxide nanoparticles with glucose transporter 1 antibody for vascular therapy [19]. Gawali et al. prepared magnetic nanoparticles conjugated with bovine serum albumin protein for magnetothermal therapy [21]. Unfortunately, magnetic NPs can easily aggregate, and it is difficult for them to couple with biomolecules due to the lack of functional groups, which limits the applications of magnetic nanomaterials [22]. In order to overcome these shortcomings, metal or metal oxide shells were coated on the surface of the magnetic nanomaterials to decorate the nanoparticles [23]. Noble metals (Au, Ag) are considered to be the most ideal coating material due to their unique optical properties, localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), high stability, biocompatibility, and easy surface functionalization [24,25,26,27]. Magnetic–plasmonic NPs, consisting of plasmonic metal materials (Au or Ag) coated onto the surfaces of magnetic NPs, can exhibit more physical and chemical properties than individual magnetic or plasmonic NPs, such as magnetic, plasmonic, biological, compatibility, chemical stability, and physicochemical properties [28,29,30,31]. They are considered as effective candidate materials for catalysts [32], sensors [33], antibacterial materials [34], cancer detection [35], and medical applications [36]. Therefore, it is of great significance to combine magnetic NPs with noble metal materials to generate nanoparticles that simultaneously exhibit both excellent magnetic and plasmonic characteristics. This has been the focus of many researchers in recent years. In 2020, Kou et al. prepared flower-shaped Fe3O4-Au NPs and found that the magnetic properties gradually decreased by increasing the amount of Au seeds [37]. Aarthi et al. synthesized Fe3O4/Ag NPs and studied the surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), and the photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of the nanoparticles [38]. Oguzlar studied Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@Ag NPs to improve the oxygen sensitivity of ruthenium dyes [39]. In 2021, Du et al. synthesized Fe3O4@Au core-shell NPs and studied both the magnetic and optical properties derived from the Fe3O4 NPs and the Au nano-shells [40]. Salimi et al. prepared Au-Fe3O4 NPs and studied the nano-morphology and formation process of the Au-Fe3O4 NPs [41]. In 2022, Lv et al. prepared the Fe3O4@Au NPs, which showed LSPR absorption in the near-infrared region [42]. Mikoliunaite et al. prepared Fe3O4@Ag NPs and found that their plasmonic resonance could be varied from 470 to 800 nm by changing the volume of the Ag colloid solution [43]. In 2023, Ravichandran et al. synthesized Fe3O4/Ag NPs and studied the dye removal rate of the Fe3O4/Ag NPs in the presence of a reducing agent [44]. According to the above works, most of the research on Fe3O4-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs was limited to a single particle type or physical property, and studies on the relationships between the coverage of the plasmonic metal NPs on the magnetic NPs surfaces and both the magnetic and plasmonic properties are lacking. Therefore, it is important to systematically investigate the magnetic and plasmonic characteristics of Fe3O4-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs.
In this work, we prepared the Au- or Ag-decorated Fe3O4 nanoparticles coated with PEI (Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs) using a simple method. Fe3O4 NPs were synthesized through a co-precipitation method, and plasmonic metal (Au or Ag) NPs were prepared using a chemical reduction method. Fe3O4 NPs and plasmonic metal NPs were mixed at room temperature to form Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs. In this process, positively charged PEI was assembled onto negatively charged Fe3O4 through electrostatic self-assembly. Then, negatively charged plasmonic metal NPs were electrostatically bound to the positively charged PEI-coated Fe3O4 NPs, resulting in a formation of Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs (Scheme 1). The density of the plasmonic metal NPs coated on the Fe3O4 NPs was adjusted by controlling the concentration of polyethyleneimine (PEI), and the effects of the plasmonic metal NPs’ density on the magnetic and plasmonic properties of the Fe3O4-PEI-M (M=Au or Ag) NPs were studied. The relationships between the coating density of the plasmonic metal NPs and both the magnetic and plasmonic properties were established. This work can provide guidance for the application of Fe3O4-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs in the biomedical field.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O), ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2·4H2O), and ammonium hydroxide (28–30% NH3) were obtained from Merck (Shanghai, China). Polyethyleneimine (PEI, branched, Mw ≈ 10,000 g/mol), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), chloroauric acid (HAuCl4), silver nitrate (AgNO3), sodium borohydride (NaBH4), and sodium citrate (C6H5Na3O7·2H2O) were obtained from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). All chemicals were used as received with no further purification.

2.2. Synthesis of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles

Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized through a co-precipitation method [45]. A total of 4.25 g of FeCl3·6H2O and 2 g of FeCl3·6H2O were added to 200 mL of ultrapure water. In an oxygen-free environment, the mixture was heated to 70 °C with stirring at 800 rpm and maintained at this temperature for 1 h. A total of 10 mL of ammonia solution (25% wt) was added into the mixture. A black precipitate was produced, indicating the formation of Fe3O4 NPs. The resulting solution was stirred for another 15 min. The nanoparticles were purified by means of magnetic separation five times and then redispersed in 200 mL of ultrapure water for further use.

2.3. Synthesis of Au Nanoparticles

Au nanoparticles were synthesized through NaBH4 reduction of chloroauric acid [29]. Firstly, 0.5 mL of 0.01 M HAuCl4 was mixed with 0.5 mL of a 0.01 M trisodium citrate solution. Then, the mixture was added into 18 mL of ultrapure water and stirred at 1200 rpm. A total of 0.5 mL of an ice 0.04 M NaBH4 solution was quickly added with vigorous stirring at room temperature. When the solution turned pink, indicating the formation of Au NPs, the solution was allowed to stand for 2 h. The particles were collected by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. The Au nanoparticles were stored in the fridge until further use.

2.4. Synthesis of Ag Nanoparticles

Ag nanoparticles were prepared through the NaBH4 reduction of silver nitrate [46]. Briefly, 10 mL of a 1 mM AgNO3 solution was mixed with 0.8 mL of 40 mM sodium citrate solution used as stabilizer. A total of 0.2 mL of an ice 0.06 M NaBH4 solution was added into the mixture, and the mixture was stirred at 1200 rpm for 15 min. After the solution turned dark yellow, indicating the formation of Ag NPs, the Ag nanoparticles were collected by means of centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. The Ag nanoparticles were stored in the fridge until further use.

2.5. Synthesis of Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs

Firstly, 2 mL of the Fe3O4 NPs suspension (1 mg/mL) was mixed with 20 mL of the PEI solution. After 60 min of ultrasonic treatment, the mixture was left to stand for half an hour [47]. Subsequently, magnetic separation was employed for washing the nanoparticles. The PEI-coated Fe3O4 NPs were finally redispersed in 2 mL of ultrapure water. Then, the 0.5 mL PEI-coated Fe3O4 NPs solution was mixed with 4.5 mL of the plasmonic metal (Au or Ag) NPs solution. The mixture was continuously stirred at 2000 rpm for 45 min. Finally, the Au- or Ag-decorated Fe3O4 nanoparticles coated with PEI were collected by magnetic separation and washed with ultrapure water three times. By varying the concentrations of the PEI solution, the adhesion density of the plasmonic metal NPs on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces could be changed.

2.6. Electric Field Simulation

To investigate the plasmonic properties of nanoparticles, the electric field distributions of the nanoparticles were simulated using the finite element method with the commercial software COMSOL 5.5. The excitation beam was a plane wave polarized along the x-axis with the plasmonic resonance wavelength of the nanoparticle, and the permittivities of Au and Ag were taken from the experimental data of Johnson and Christy [48]. The mesh size was set to 2 nm.

2.7. Characterization

The morphology and structure of the nanoparticles were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-7000F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Hydrodynamic diameter and zeta-potential measurements were carried out using dynamic light scattering (DLS, Delsa, Palmdale, CA, USA). The crystalline structure of the nanoparticles was analyzed by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD, D8 ADVANCE, Bruker, Bremen, Germany). UV–visible absorption spectra were obtained using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Cary 5000, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Magnetization measurements of the nanoparticles were performed using a vibrating sample magnetometer (MPMS-squid VSM-094, Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Study on the Plasmonic Metal Nanoparticles

3.1.1. Au Nanoparticles

To prepare suitable Au nanoparticles for coating Fe3O4 NPs’ surfaces, we investigated the influence of the reducing agent (NaBH4) concentrations on the Au nanoparticles. Figure 1 shows the SEM images of the Au NPs synthesized with NaBH4 concentrations ranging from 4 to 0.04 M. We found that the synthesized Au nanoparticles formed agglomerates with an average diameter of about 12 nm when the NaBH4 concentration was 4 M (Figure 1a). With a decrease in the NaBH4 concentration from 4 to 0.04 M, the Au NPs became more diffuse, and the particle size became more uniform. When the NaBH4 concentration was 0.04 M, the average diameter of the Au NPs was about 10 nm, as shown in Figure 1f, and there was excellent dispersion, which was beneficial for attachment on the Fe3O4 NPs’ surfaces. Figure 1 shows that the particles size increased and more easily agglomerated with the increase in NaBH4 concentration. This is attributed to the over-reduction of HAuCl4 in the case of excessive amounts of reducing agent [49,50].

3.1.2. Ag Nanoparticles

In addition, we also investigated the Ag NPs, which were prepared using trisodium citrate as a stabilizer and NaBH4 to reduce AgNO3. Figure 2 shows the SEM images of the Ag NPs prepared with different NaBH4 concentrations. We found that the synthesized Ag nanoparticles formed agglomerates with an average diameter of about 25 nm when the NaBH4 concentration was 8.5 M (Figure 2a). With a decrease in the NaBH4 concentration from 8.5 to 0.06 M, the Ag NPs became more diffuse, and the size became more uniform [51]. This was due to more Ag atoms being produced with the increase in NaBH4 concentration [49]. When the concentration of NaBH4 was 0.06 M, the average diameter of the Au NPs was about 10 nm, as shown in Figure 2f, and there was excellent dispersion, which is desirable for the further preparation of Ag-decorated Fe3O4 NPs.

3.2. Study on the Properties of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au Nanoparticles

3.2.1. Fe3O4-PEI-Au Nanoparticles

In order to explore the magnetic and plasmonic properties of the Au-decorated Fe3O4 nanoparticles, we synthesized the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs with different densities of Au NPs on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces. Figure 3 shows the SEM image of the Fe3O4 NPs, and the average size was about 80 nm in diameter.
The coating density of Au NPs on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces was controlled by changing the PEI concentration. PEI is used as a bonding material. It is a water-soluble cationic polymer which contains amino and imino groups in each polymer chain. When the polymer PEI is dispersed in aqueous solution, each polymer chain is positively charged due to the amino and imino groups [52]. When the Fe3O4 NPs are immersed in a PEI solution, positively charged PEI is assembled onto the negatively charged Fe3O4 through electrostatic self-assembly, leading to the formation of a stable polyelectrolyte layer. Subsequently, the negatively charged Au NPs are easily electrostatically bound to the positively charged PEI-coated Fe3O4 NPs, resulting in a formation of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs [53]. Figure 4 shows the SEM and TEM images of the Au-decorated Fe3O4 NPs treated with different concentrations of PEI solutions. It shows that 10 nm diameter Au NPs were attached to the surfaces of 80 nm diameter Fe3O4 NPs. DLS measurements depicted that the hydrodynamic diameter of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs is about 131 nm (shown in Figure 5), and the zeta potential is around +18.4 mV. When the Fe3O4 NPs were treated with a 5 mg/mL PEI solution, a small amount of Au NP was coated on the Fe3O4 NPs’ surfaces, as shown in Figure 4a,e. With an increase in the PEI concentration from 5 to 35 mg/mL, the coating density of the Au NPs gradually increased, and thus the coverage of the Au NPs on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces increased. This is attributed to a greater amount of NH2 groups provided by PEI that can adsorb more Au NPs with an increase in the PEI concentration.

3.2.2. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis

An X-ray diffractometer was used to characterize the crystal structures of the Fe3O4 and Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs. As shown in Figure 6a, the XRD spectrum of Fe3O4 showed six diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 30.43°, 35.78°, 43.44°, 53.79°, 57.34°, and 62.89°, corresponding to the diffraction peaks located at (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), and (440). All these diffraction peaks correspond to the face-centered cubic structure of Fe3O4. Compared to that of Fe3O4, the XRD spectrum of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs exhibited additional peaks at 38.62°, 44.67°, 64.61°, and 77.62°, which match well with the (111), (200), (220), and (311) faces of Au. This result is consistent with that reported in the literature [54]. Therefore, the X-ray diffraction spectra further confirmed that Au NPs were successfully loaded onto the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces. In addition, in Figure 6b, it is implied that with an increase in the PEI concentration, the characteristic peak intensities of the Au NPs gradually increased, while the characteristic peak intensities of the Fe3O4 NPs gradually decreased. This is because of the increase in the density of Au NPs coated on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces. No peaks of other impurities were detected in the XRD spectra, indicating a high purity of the materials.

3.2.3. Analysis of Magnetic and Plasmonic Properties

Firstly, the magnetic properties of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs with different coverages of the Au NPs on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces were studied. Figure 7a exhibits the hysteresis loops of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs with different Au NP densities, controlled by using different PEI concentrations (the magnetic field scanning range was 20,000 g at 300 K). All the curves for the Fe3O4 and Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs have similar shapes. The saturation magnetization of the Fe3O4 NPs was 60 emu/g, which is same as that of Fe3O4 NPs in a previous study [55]. After treatment with the PEI solution, the saturation magnetization of the Fe3O4-PEI NPs decreased to 57 emu/g. This value is a little smaller than the one previously reported for PEI-coated Fe3O4 NPs [56]. This may be due to the agglomeration of particles and the interaction between them [55]. Furthermore, for the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs, when the PEI concentration increased from 5 to 35 mg/mL, the Au NP coating density increased, and the saturation magnetization of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs decreased from 55 to 16 emu/g, as shown in Table 1. The reduction in saturation magnetization of the Fe3O4 NPs due to the introduction of plasmonic metal NPs could be demonstrated in reference [54]. Therefore, with the increase in the density of the Au NPs on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces, the shielding effect of the Au NPs on the Fe3O4 NPs increases.
Due to Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs with different Au NP densities exhibiting different magnetic and plasmonic properties, we also investigated the plasmonic properties of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs. Figure 7b shows the absorption spectra of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs with different Au NP densities. The Fe3O4 NPs had no absorption peak in the visible region, which is consistent with the result from a previous study [57]. The absorption peak of the Au NPs was located at 519 nm. When the PEI concentration increased from 5 to 35 mg/mL, the Au NP coating density increased and the absorption peak of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs red shifted from 526 to 578 nm (shown in Table 1) because of the decrease in the gap distance between the Au NPs. To further investigate the influence of the Au NP coating density on the enhanced electric field of the nanoparticles, three-dimensional models of the Fe3O4 nanoparticle decorated with different Au NP densities were built. Many researchers calculated electric field characteristics by quantum method [58], or classical method [59,60]. Here, the electric field distributions were simulated using the finite element method with the commercial software COMSOL 5.5. Figure 8 shows the electric field distributions of Au-decorated Fe3O4 NPs with Au NP coating densities ranging from sparse to dense. It was observed that with an increase in the Au NP coating density, the electric field became stronger, and the plasmonic coupling between the adjacent nanoparticles became stronger, indicating that the plasmonic properties were enhanced.

3.3. Study on the Properties of the Fe3O4-PEI-Ag Nanoparticles

3.3.1. Fe3O4-PEI-Ag Nanoparticles

According to Figure 7b, the plasmonic resonance peak of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs is located at about 526 nm. However, when a shorter wavelength of plasmonic resonance is needed, Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs are more suitable; thus, we also need to study their magnetic and plasmonic properties. Here, we synthesized Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs using the same methods that were utilized to prepare the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs. Similarly, positively charged PEI binds to negatively charged Fe3O4 by electrostatic self-assembly, and negatively charged Ag nanoparticles combine with positively charged PEI-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles to form Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs. Figure 9 shows SEM and TEM images of the Ag-decorated Fe3O4 NPs treated with PEI concentrations ranging from 5 to 35 mg/mL. It was observed that 10 nm diameter Ag NPs were attached to the surface of 80 nm diameter Fe3O4 NPs. DLS measurements show that the hydrodynamic diameter of the Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs is about 137 nm (as shown in Figure 10) and the zeta potential is around +19.1 mV. When the Fe3O4 NPs were treated with a 5 mg/mL PEI solution, a small amount of Ag NP was coated on the Fe3O4 NP surfaces, as shown in Figure 9a,e. When the concentration of PEI increased from 5 to 35 mg/mL, the coverage of the Ag NPs on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces increased gradually. This is because of the greater amount of NH2 groups provided by the PEI leading to an increased number of Ag NPs attached on the Fe3O4 surface with the increase in PEI concentration.

3.3.2. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

The crystalline structures of the Fe3O4 and Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs were characterized using an X-ray diffractometer. As shown in Figure 11a, the positions and relative intensities of all diffraction peaks are in good agreement with the standard Fe3O4 and Ag NP diffraction peaks. Compared to the Fe3O4 NPs, there were four more main peaks in the Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NP spectrum, which can be clearly observed at 2θ values of 38.42°, 44.63°, 64.53°, and 77.38°, corresponding to the reflection of the (111), (200), (220), and (311) crystal planes of Ag [61]. Therefore, the X-ray diffraction spectra further confirmed that Ag NPs were successfully loaded on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces. In addition, Figure 11b shows that, with an increase in the PEI concentration, the characteristic peak intensities of the Ag NPs gradually increased, while that of the Fe3O4 NPs gradually decreased. This is because of the increase in the density of Ag NPs coated on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces. No peaks of other impurities were detected in the XRD spectra, indicating high purity of the materials.

3.3.3. Analysis of Magnetic and Plasmonic Properties

Figure 12a illustrates the hysteresis loops of the Ag-decorated Fe3O4 NPs treated with different PEI concentrations. It can be observed that the curves of the Fe3O4 and Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs exhibit similar trends. The saturation magnetization of the Fe3O4 NPs was 60 emu/g. When the PEI concentration increased from 5 to 35 mg/mL, the Ag NP coating density increased, and the saturation magnetization of the Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs decreased from 56 to 22 emu/g, as shown in Table 2. Therefore, with an increase in the Ag NP density, the shielding effect of the Ag NPs coated on the Fe3O4 NPs increases.
Figure 12b shows the absorption spectra of the Ag and Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs. It shows that 10 nm Ag NPs had a plasmonic absorption peak of 406 nm. When the PEI concentration increased from 5 to 35 mg/mL, the absorption peak of the Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs red shifted from 417 to 472 nm with the increase in the Ag NP coating density (Table 2). This is due to the decrease in the gap distance between the Ag NPs. To further study the effect of Ag NP coating density on the enhanced electric field of the nanoparticles, the electric field distributions were simulated using the finite element method. Figure 13 illustrates the electric field distributions of Ag-decorated Fe3O4 NPs with varying Ag NP coating densities ranging from sparse to dense. It was found that, as the coating density increased, the electric field became stronger. Therefore, according to the analysis of the magnetic and plasmonic properties of Au- or Ag-decorated Fe3O4 NPs treated with different PEI concentrations, as shown in Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 12, and Figure 13, it is implied that when the PEI concentration is low, such as 5 mg/mL, the coverage of plasmonic metal NPs on the surface of Fe3O4 NPs is minimal. This results in a weak shielding effect of plasmonic metal NPs, leading to a strong magnetic field intensity but a weak plasmonic intensity in Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs. Conversely, when the PEI concentration is high (such as 35 mg/mL), the coverage of the plasmonic metal NPs is too large, the shielding effect of the plasmonic metal NPs is strong, the magnetic intensity becomes weak, and the plasmonic intensity becomes strong. Therefore, when the PEI concentration is between 15 and 25 mg/mL, there is an optimal coverage of the plasmonic metal NPs on the Fe3O4 NP surfaces to balance the magnetic and plasmonic properties.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we synthesized Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs using a simple method. The density of the plasmonic metal NPs coated on the Fe3O4 NPs surfaces was adjusted by controlling the PEI concentration. We investigated the effects of the Au or Ag NP coating density on the magnetic and plasmonic properties of the Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs. We found that, for the Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs, with an increase in the plasmonic metal NP density, the saturation magnetization decreased, the plasmonic intensity increased, and the plasmonic absorption peak was red shifted. When the concentration of PEI was between 15 and 25 mg/mL, Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs exhibited both excellent magnetic and plasmonic properties. The relationships among the coating density of the plasmonic metal NPs and both magnetic and plasmonic properties were established. This work can provide guidance for the application of Fe3O4-M (M = Au or Ag) NPs in the biomedical field.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N.; methodology, S.W.; investigation, Z.L., B.Y. and F.Z.; resources, N.Z.; data curation, S.W; writing—original draft preparation, S.W.; writing—review and editing, S.N.; funding acquisition, N.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (62375163 and 52177225), the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province (2023-YBSF-126), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant (2019M653635).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Price, P.M.; Mahmoud, W.E.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Bronstein, L.M. Magnetic Drug Delivery: Where the Field Is Going. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fang, Z.; Li, X.; Xu, Z.; Du, F.; Wang, W.; Shi, R.; Gao, D. Hyaluronic acid-modified mesoporous silica-coated superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 5785–5797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mokhodoeva, O.; Vlk, M.; Málková, E.; Kukleva, E.; Mičolová, P.; Štamberg, K.; Šlouf, M.; Dzhenloda, R.; Kozempel, J. Study of 223Ra uptake mechanism by Fe3O4 nanoparticles: Towards new prospective theranostic SPIONs. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2016, 18, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Efimova, N.V.; Krasnopyorova, A.P.; Yuhno, G.D.; Sofronov, D.S.; Rucki, M. Uptake of Radionuclides 60Co, 137Cs, and 90Sr with α-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 Particles from Aqueous Environment. Materials 2021, 14, 2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lu, Q.; Dai, X.; Zhang, P.; Tan, X.; Zhong, Y.; Yao, C.; Song, M.; Song, G.; Zhang, Z.; Peng, G.; et al. Fe3O4@Au composite magnetic nanoparticles modified with cetuximab for targeted magneto-photothermal therapy of glioma cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 2491–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fotukian, S.M.; Barati, A.; Soleymani, M.; Alizadeh, A.M. Solvothermal synthesis of CuFe2O4 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles with high heating efficiency for magnetic hyperthermia application. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 816, 152548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qu, J.; Liu, G.; Wang, Y.; Hong, R. Preparation of Fe3O4–chitosan nanoparticles used for hyperthermia. Adv. Powder Technol. 2010, 21, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Żuk, M.; Podgórski, R.; Ruszczyńska, A.; Ciach, T.; Majkowska-Pilip, A.; Bilewicz, A.; Krysiński, P. Multifunctional Nanoparticles Based on Iron Oxide and Gold-198 Designed for Magnetic Hyperthermia and Radionuclide Therapy as a Potential Tool for Combined HER2-Positive Cancer Treatment. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dukenbayev, K.; Korolkov, I.V.; Tishkevich, D.I.; Kozlovskiy, A.L.; Trukhanov, S.V.; Gorin, Y.G.; Shumskaya, E.E.; Kaniukov, E.Y.; Vinnik, D.A.; Zdorovets, M.V.; et al. Fe3O4 Nanoparticles for Complex Targeted Delivery and Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shen, L.; Li, B.; Qiao, Y. Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in Targeted Drug/Gene Delivery Systems. Materials 2018, 11, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luan, D.; Zheng, A.; Gao, X.; Xu, K.; Tang, B. Fishing out Methionine-Containing Proteins from Complex Biological Systems Based on a Non-Enzymatic Biochemical Reaction. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kristianto, H.; Reynaldi, E.; Prasetyo, S.K.; Sugih, A. Adsorbed leucaena protein on citrate modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, and its application as magnetic coagulant. Environ. Res. 2020, 30, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jose, L.; Lee, C.; Hwang, A.; Park, J.H.; Song, J.K.; Paik, H. Magnetically steerable Fe3O4@Ni2+-NTA-polystyrene nanoparticles for the immobilization and separation of his6-protein. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 112, 524–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Loh, K.S.; Lee, Y.H.; Musa, A.; Salmah, A.A.; Zamri, I. Use of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles for Enhancement of Biosensor Response to the Herbicide 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid. Sensors 2008, 8, 5775–5791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Yang, X. A sensitive choline biosensor using Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles as peroxidase mimics. Analyst 2011, 136, 4960–4965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kore, R.; Sawant, A.D.; Rogers, R.D. Recyclable Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticle-Supported Chloroaluminate Ionic Liquids for Heterogeneous Lewis Acid Catalysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 8797–8802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, S.; Zhao, X.; Yu, X.; Wan, Y.; Yin, M.; Zhang, W.; Cao, B.; Wang, H. Fe3O4 Nanozymes with Aptamer-Tuned Catalysis for Selective Colorimetric Analysis of ATP in Blood. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 14737–14742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Akram, N.; Ma, W.; Guo, J.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Hassan, A.; Wang, J. Synergistic catalysis of Fe3O4/CuO bimetallic catalyst derived from Prussian blue analogues for the efficient decomposition of various organic pollutants. Chem. Phys. 2021, 540, 110974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sohn, C.H.; Park, S.P.; Choi, S.H.; Park, S.H.; Kim, S.; Xu, L.; Kim, S.H.; Hur, J.A.; Choi, J.; Choi, T.H. MRI molecular imaging using GLUT1 antibody-Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the hemangioma animal model for differentiating infantile hemangioma from vascular malformation. Nanomedicine 2015, 11, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zou, X.; Li, K.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, B.; Song, C. Ferroferric oxide/l-cysteine magnetic nanospheres for capturing histidine-tagged proteins. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 5108–5113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gawali, S.L.; Shelar, S.B.; Gupta, J.; Barick, K.C.; Hassan, P.A. Immobilization of protein on Fe3O4 nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 166, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, C.H.; Chan, M.H.; Chang, Y.C.; Hsiao, M. Gold Nanoparticles as a Biosensor for Cancer Biomarker Determination. Molecules 2023, 28, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xu, Z.; Hou, Y.; Sun, S. Magnetic core/shell Fe3O4/Au and Fe3O4/Au/Ag nanoparticles with tunable plasmonic properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8698–8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ramesh, R.; Geerthana, M.; Prabhu, S.; Sohila, S. Synthesis and Characterization of the Superparamagnetic Fe3O4/Ag Nanocomposites. J. Clust. Sci. 2017, 28, 963–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Abdollahi, S.N.; Naderi, M.; Amoabediny, G. Synthesis and physicochemical characterization of tunable silica-gold nanoshells via seed growth method. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2012, 414, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abkenar, A.K.; Naderi, M. Chemical synthesis of gold nanoparticles with different morphology from a secondary source. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2016, 13, 2173–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rajan, A.; Vilas, V.; Philip, D. Studies on catalytic, antioxidant, antibacterial and anticancer activities of biogenic gold nanoparticles. J. Mol. Liq. 2015, 212, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lie, J.; Huang, J.; You, R.; Lu, Y. Preparation and Application of Magnetic Molecularly Imprinted Plasmonic SERS Composite Nanoparticles. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2023, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Han, D.; Li, B.; Chen, Y.; Wu, T.; Kou, Y.; Xue, X.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Duan, Q. Facile synthesis of Fe3O4@Au core–shell nanocomposite as a recyclable magnetic surface enhanced Raman scattering substrate for thiram detection. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 465703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dheyab, A.M.; Aziz, A.A.; Jameel, M.S.; Khaniabadi, M.P. Recent Advances in Synthesis, Medical Applications and Challenges for Gold-Coated Iron Oxide: Comprehensive Study. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, C.H.; Zhou, Z.D.; Yu, X.; Lv, B.Q.; Mao, J.F.; Xiao, D. Preparation and characterization of Fe3O4/Ag composite magnetic nanoparticles. Inorg. Mater. 2008, 44, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rajkumar, S.; Prabaharan, M. Theranostics Based on Iron Oxide and Gold Nanoparticles for Imaging-Guided Photothermal and Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 1858–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jiang, W.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xuan, S.; Gong, X. Superparamagnetic Ag@Fe3O4 core–shell nanospheres: Fabrication, characterization and application as reusable nanocatalysts. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 4594–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gai, K.; Qi, H.; Li, X.; Liu, X. Detection of Residual Methomyl in Vegetables with an Electrochemical Sensor based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with Fe3O4/Ag composite. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2019, 14, 1283–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Amarjargal, A.; Tijing, L.D.; Im, I.T.; Kim, C.S. Simultaneous preparation of Ag/Fe3O4 core–shell nanocomposites with enhanced magnetic moment and strong antibacterial and catalytic properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 226, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Benvidi, A.; Jahanbani, S. Self-assembled monolayer of SH-DNA strand on a magnetic bar carbon paste electrode modified with Fe3O4@Ag nanoparticles for detection of breast cancer mutation. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 768, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kou, Y.; Wu, T.; Xing, G.; Huang, X.; Han, D.; Yang, S.; Guo, C.; Gao, W.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; et al. Highly efficient and recyclable catalyst: Porous Fe3O4-Au magnetic nanocomposites with tailored synthesis. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 225701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aarthi, A.; Umadevi, M.; Parimaladevi, R.; Sathe, G.V.; Arumugam, S.; Sivaprakash, P. A Negatively Charged Hydrophobic Hemi-micelle of Fe3O4/Ag MNP Role Towards SERS, Photocatalysis and Bactericidal. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2021, 31, 1469–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Oguzlar, S. Development of highly sensitive [Ru(bpy)3]2+-Based optical oxygen sensing thin films in the presence with Fe3O4 and Fe3O4@Ag NPs. Opt. Mater. 2020, 101, 109772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Du, B.W.; Chu, C.Y.; Lin, C.C.; Ko, F.H. The Multifunctionally Graded System for a Controlled Size Effect on Iron Oxide–Gold Based Core-Shell Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Salimi, Z.; Ehsani, M.H.; Dezfuli, A.S.; Alamzadeh, Z. Evaluation of Iron and Au-Fe3O4 Ferrite Nanoparticles for Biomedical Application. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2022, 35, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lv, X.; Fang, Z.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Qin, Y.; Li, N.; Li, C.; Xu, J.; et al. Interfacial preparation of multi-branched magneto-plasmonic Fe3O4@Au core@shell nanocomposites as efficient photothermal agents for antibacterial application. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 932, 167712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mikoliunaite, L.; Talaikis, M.; Michalowska, A.; Dobilas, J.; Stankevic, V.; Kudelski, A.; Niaura, G. Thermally Stable Magneto-Plasmonic Nanoparticles for SERS with Tunable Plasmon Resonance. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ravichandran, R.; Annamalai, K.; Annamalai, A.; Elumalai, S. Solid state—Green construction of starch- beaded Fe3O4@Ag nanocomposite as superior redox catalyst. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 664, 131117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Iranzad, F.; Gheibi, M.; Eftekhari, M. Synthesis and application of polythiophene-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles for preconcentration of ultra-trace levels of cadmium in different real samples followed by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2018, 98, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wojtysiak, S.; Kudelski, A. Influence of oxygen on the process of formation of silver nanoparticles during citrate/borohydride synthesis of silver sols. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2012, 410, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Song, Y.; Chen, J.; Yang, X.; Zhang, D.; Zou, Y.; Ni, D.; Ye, J.; Yu, Z.; Chen, Q.; Jin, S.; et al. Fabrication of Fe3O4@Ag magnetic nanoparticles for highly active SERS enhancement and paraquat detection. Microchem. J. 2022, 173, 107019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Johnson, P.; Christy, R. Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys. Rev. B 1972, 6, 4370–4379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Iqbal, M.; Usanase, G.; Oulmi, K.; Aberkane, F.; Bendaikha, T.; Fessi, H.; Zine, N.; Agusti, G.; Errachid, E.; Elaissari, A. Preparation of gold nanoparticles and determination of their particles size via different methods. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 79, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zulikifli, F.W.A.; Yazid, H.; Halim, M.Z.B.A.; Jani, A.M.M. Synthesis of gold nanoparticles on multi-walled carbon nanotubes (Au-MWCNTs) via deposition precipitation method. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1877, 070003. [Google Scholar]
  51. Acharya, D.; Mohanta, B.; Pandey, P.; Singha, M.; Nasiri, F. Optical and antibacterial properties of synthesised silver nanoparticles. Micro Nano Lett. 2017, 12, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Boussif, O.; Lezoualc’h, F.; Zanta, M.A.; Mergny, M.D.; Scherman, D.; Demeneix, B.; Behr, J.P. A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo: Polyethylenimine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 7297–7301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Salihov, S.V.; Ivanenkov, Y.A.; Krechetov, S.P.; Veselov, M.S.; Sviridenkova, N.V.; Savchenko, A.G.; Klyachko, N.L.; Golovin, Y.I.; Chufarova, N.V.; Beloglazkina, E.K.; et al. Recent advances in the synthesis of Fe3O4@Au core/shell nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 394, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xing, Y.; Jin, Y.Y.; Si, J.C.; Peng, M.L.; Wang, X.F.; Chen, C.; Cui, Y.L. Controllable synthesis and characterization of Fe3O4/Au composite nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 380, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gerulová, K.; Kucmanová, A.; Sanny, Z.; Garaiová, Z.; Seiler, E.; Čaplovičová, M.; Čaplovič, Ľ.; Palcut, M. Fe3O4-PEI Nanocomposites for Magnetic Harvesting of Chlorella vulgaris, Chlorella ellipsoidea, Microcystis aeruginosa, and Auxenochlorella protothecoides. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Félix, L.; Martínez, M.A.R.; Salazar, D.G.P.; Coaquira, J.A.H. One-step synthesis of polyethyleneimine-coated magnetite nanoparticles and their structural, magnetic, and power absorption study. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 41807–41815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liang, R.; Yao, G.; Fan, L.; Qiu, J. Magnetic Fe3O4@Au composite-enhanced surface plasmon resonance for ultrasensitive detection of magnetic nanoparticle-enriched α-fetoprotein. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 737, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ilawe, N.V.; Oviedo, M.B.; Wong, B.M. Effect of quantum tunneling on the efficiency of excitation energy transfer in plasmonic nanoparticle chain waveguides. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 5857–5864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Terrés-Haro, J.M.; Monreal-Trigo, J.; Hernández-Montoto, A.; Ibáñez-Civera, F.J.; Masot-Peris, R.; Martínez-Máñez, R. Finite Element Models of Gold Nanoparticles and Their Suspensions for Photothermal Effect Calculation. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lin, C.; Zhu, G.; Liu, G.; Zhu, L. FDTD simulation of the optical properties for gold nanoparticles. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 125009. [Google Scholar]
  61. Chu, D.T.; Sai, D.C.; Luu, Q.M.; Tran, H.T.; Quach, T.D.; Kim, D.H.; Nguyen, N.H. Synthesis of Bifunctional Fe3O4@SiO2-Ag Magnetic–Plasmonic Nanoparticles by an Ultrasound Assisted Chemical Method. J. Electron. Mater. 2017, 46, 3646–3653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 17 00509 sch001
Scheme 1. Schematic of the preparation of Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) nanoparticles.
Scheme 1. Schematic of the preparation of Fe3O4-PEI-M (M = Au or Ag) nanoparticles.
Materials 17 00509 sch001
Materials 17 00509 g001
Figure 1. SEM images of the Au NPs prepared with (a) 4 M, (b) 2 M, (c) 1 M, (d) 0.4 M, (e) 0.08 M, and (f) 0.04 M NaBH4 solution.
Figure 1. SEM images of the Au NPs prepared with (a) 4 M, (b) 2 M, (c) 1 M, (d) 0.4 M, (e) 0.08 M, and (f) 0.04 M NaBH4 solution.
Materials 17 00509 g001
Materials 17 00509 g002
Figure 2. SEM images of the Ag NPs prepared with (a) 8.5 M, (b) 0.85 M, (c) 0.43 M, (d) 0.17 M, (e) 0.08 M, and (f) 0.06 M NaBH4 solution.
Figure 2. SEM images of the Ag NPs prepared with (a) 8.5 M, (b) 0.85 M, (c) 0.43 M, (d) 0.17 M, (e) 0.08 M, and (f) 0.06 M NaBH4 solution.
Materials 17 00509 g002
Materials 17 00509 g003
Figure 3. SEM image of the Fe3O4 NPs.
Figure 3. SEM image of the Fe3O4 NPs.
Materials 17 00509 g003
Materials 17 00509 g004
Figure 4. SEM images of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs treated with (a) 5, (b) 15, (c) 25, and (d) 35 mg/mL PEI solution. The corresponding TEM images of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs treated with (e) 5, (f) 15, (g) 25, and (h) 35 mg/mL PEI solution.
Figure 4. SEM images of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs treated with (a) 5, (b) 15, (c) 25, and (d) 35 mg/mL PEI solution. The corresponding TEM images of the Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs treated with (e) 5, (f) 15, (g) 25, and (h) 35 mg/mL PEI solution.
Materials 17 00509 g004
Materials 17 00509 g005
Figure 5. Hydrodynamic diameter distribution of Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs (PEI: 35 mg/mL).
Figure 5. Hydrodynamic diameter distribution of Fe3O4-PEI-Au NPs (PEI: 35 mg/mL).
Materials 17 00509 g005
Materials 17 00509 g006
Figure 6. XRD spectra of the (a) Fe3O4 and Fe3O4-PEI-Au (FPAu) NPs, and (b) Fe3O4-PEI-Au (FPAu) NPs treated with 5~35 mg/mL PEI solution.
Figure 6. XRD spectra of the (a) Fe3O4 and Fe3O4-PEI-Au (FPAu) NPs, and (b) Fe3O4-PEI-Au (FPAu) NPs treated with 5~35 mg/mL PEI solution.
Materials 17 00509 g006
Materials 17 00509 g007
Figure 7. (a) Hysteresis loops and (b) normalized absorption spectra of the Fe3O4 and Fe3O4−PEI−Au (FPAu) NPs treated with 5~35 mg/mL PEI solution.
Figure 7. (a) Hysteresis loops and (b) normalized absorption spectra of the Fe3O4 and Fe3O4−PEI−Au (FPAu) NPs treated with 5~35 mg/mL PEI solution.
Materials 17 00509 g007
Materials 17 00509 g008
Figure 8. Electric field distributions of the Fe3O4 NP coating with Au NPs of (a) sparse, (b) medium, and (c) dense.
Figure 8. Electric field distributions of the Fe3O4 NP coating with Au NPs of (a) sparse, (b) medium, and (c) dense.
Materials 17 00509 g008
Materials 17 00509 g009
Figure 9. SEM images of the Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs treated with (a) 5, (b) 15, (c) 25, and (d) 35 mg/mL PEI solution. The corresponding TEM images of the Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs treated with (e) 5, (f) 15, (g) 25, and (h) 35 mg/mL PEI solution.
Figure 9. SEM images of the Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs treated with (a) 5, (b) 15, (c) 25, and (d) 35 mg/mL PEI solution. The corresponding TEM images of the Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs treated with (e) 5, (f) 15, (g) 25, and (h) 35 mg/mL PEI solution.
Materials 17 00509 g009
Materials 17 00509 g010
Figure 10. Hydrodynamic diameter distribution of Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs (PEI: 35 mg/mL).
Figure 10. Hydrodynamic diameter distribution of Fe3O4-PEI-Ag NPs (PEI: 35 mg/mL).
Materials 17 00509 g010
Materials 17 00509 g011
Figure 11. XRD spectra of the (a) Fe3O4 and Fe3O4-PEI-Ag (FPAg) NPs, and (b) Fe3O4-PEI-Ag (FPAg) NPs treated with 5~35 mg/mL PEI solution.
Figure 11. XRD spectra of the (a) Fe3O4 and Fe3O4-PEI-Ag (FPAg) NPs, and (b) Fe3O4-PEI-Ag (FPAg) NPs treated with 5~35 mg/mL PEI solution.
Materials 17 00509 g011
Materials 17 00509 g012
Figure 12. (a) Hysteresis loops and (b) normalized absorption spectra of the Fe3O4 and Fe3O4−PEI−Ag (FPAg) NPs treated with 5~35 mg/mL PEI solution.
Figure 12. (a) Hysteresis loops and (b) normalized absorption spectra of the Fe3O4 and Fe3O4−PEI−Ag (FPAg) NPs treated with 5~35 mg/mL PEI solution.
Materials 17 00509 g012
Materials 17 00509 g013
Figure 13. Electric field distributions of the Fe3O4 NP coating with Ag NPs of (a) sparse, (b) medium, (c) dense.
Figure 13. Electric field distributions of the Fe3O4 NP coating with Ag NPs of (a) sparse, (b) medium, (c) dense.
Materials 17 00509 g013
Table 1. Absorption peak wavelength and saturation magnetization of the Fe3O4, Au, Fe3O4-PEI-Au nanoparticles treated with different PEI concentrations.
Table 1. Absorption peak wavelength and saturation magnetization of the Fe3O4, Au, Fe3O4-PEI-Au nanoparticles treated with different PEI concentrations.
Fe3O4AuFe3O4-PEI-Au
PEI: 5 mg/mL		Fe3O4-PEI-Au
PEI: 15 mg/mL		Fe3O4-PEI-Au
PEI: 25 mg/mL		Fe3O4-PEI-Au
PEI: 35 mg/mL
Absorption peak (nm)/519526535552578
Saturation magnetization (emu/g)60/55463116
Table 2. Absorption peak and saturation magnetization of Fe3O4, Ag, and Fe3O4-PEI-Ag nanoparticles treated with different PEI concentrations.
Table 2. Absorption peak and saturation magnetization of Fe3O4, Ag, and Fe3O4-PEI-Ag nanoparticles treated with different PEI concentrations.
Fe3O4AgFe3O4-PEI-Ag
PEI: 5 mg/mL		Fe3O4-PEI-Ag
PEI: 15 mg/mL		Fe3O4-PEI-Ag
PEI: 25 mg/mL		Fe3O4-PEI-Ag
PEI: 35 mg/mL
Absorption peak (nm)/406417425442472
Saturation magnetization (emu/g)60/56493622
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ning, S.; Wang, S.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, N.; Yang, B.; Zhang, F. Study on Magnetic and Plasmonic Properties of Fe3O4-PEI-Au and Fe3O4-PEI-Ag Nanoparticles. Materials 2024, 17, 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17020509

AMA Style

Ning S, Wang S, Liu Z, Zhang N, Yang B, Zhang F. Study on Magnetic and Plasmonic Properties of Fe3O4-PEI-Au and Fe3O4-PEI-Ag Nanoparticles. Materials. 2024; 17(2):509. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17020509

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ning, Shuya, Shuo Wang, Zhihui Liu, Naming Zhang, Bin Yang, and Fanghui Zhang. 2024. "Study on Magnetic and Plasmonic Properties of Fe3O4-PEI-Au and Fe3O4-PEI-Ag Nanoparticles" Materials 17, no. 2: 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17020509

APA Style

Ning, S., Wang, S., Liu, Z., Zhang, N., Yang, B., & Zhang, F. (2024). Study on Magnetic and Plasmonic Properties of Fe3O4-PEI-Au and Fe3O4-PEI-Ag Nanoparticles. Materials, 17(2), 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17020509

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop