Next Article in Journal
Recent Developments in Catalytic Carbonyl Sulfur Hydrolysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Kinetics of Precipitation Hardening Phases in Recycled 2017A Aluminum Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Robust Bridge Deck Pavement System Based on Horseshoe-Shaped Shear Keys
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Yb on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al-Cu-Mn Heat-Resistant Aluminum Alloys
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of Application of an Active Ultrasound by Use of Zn-Al-Mg-Ti-Based Solder on Selected Substrates

1
Faculty of Materials Science and Technology in Trnava, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Jána Bottu No. 2781/25, 917 24 Trnava, Slovakia
2
Department of Non-Ferrous Metals, Refining and Recycling, FMT-Faculty of Materials Science and Technology, Technical University of Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 15, 708 33 Ostrava, Czech Republic
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(5), 1094; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18051094
Submission received: 24 January 2025 / Revised: 10 February 2025 / Accepted: 14 February 2025 / Published: 28 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical Metallurgy of Metals and Alloys (3rd Edition))

Abstract

:
This study investigates the potential application of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti active solder in ultrasonic soldering of Al2O3 ceramics and Cu substrates. The research explores the microstructural characteristics, phase composition, and mechanical properties of the solder and the resulting joints. Particular attention is given to the formation mechanisms of the solder–substrate bond and the role of ultrasound activation in enhancing wettability and bond strength. The study aimed to provide a deeper understanding of active soldering processes and their suitability for high-temperature applications. The findings contribute to advancing lead-free soldering technologies for electronic and structural applications.

1. Introduction

Soldering alloys are extremely important in the electronic industry, where they are used for soldering of electronic components and printed circuit boards (PCBs). Traditional high-temperature solders, such as Pb5Sn and Pb10Sn, are widely used in electronic packages and the automotive, aviation, space and power industries [1,2]. Sn-Pb-based solders are often used in electronic equipment due to their reliability and durability. However, lead is toxic and harmful to health, so manufacturers are increasingly required to use alternative soldering alloys [3,4].
Research into soldering materials in this field has advanced considerably, leading to the development of many other soldering alloys that can replace traditional lead-based alloys. Several possible alloy systems meet these criteria, including those based on gold, bismuth or silver; however, their high price significantly limits their application. Zinc-based alloys, on the other hand, seem to be a suitable alternative, offering high strength, good thermal and electrical conductivity and high reliability, among other advantages [5,6,7].
As a substitute for high-temperature solders, each of these alloys presents certain pros and cons. Based on these considerations, zinc-based alloys seem to be the most suitable. These alloys are not only affordably priced but also provide excellent strength, efficient thermal and electric conductivity and high-level reliability. Existing sources highlight Al-Zn-based solders in particular, which are characterized by an ideal melting point range, corrosion resistance and impressive mechanical properties [8,9,10].
In conclusion, these alloys represent promising options for applications in the pro-duction of power semiconductors, optical devices and diverse electronic applications [11,12,13]. Zinc-based alloys have been proposed as promising lead-free solders due to their low cost, low coefficient of thermal expansivity and good electrical and thermal conductivity [14,15,16]. The addition of Mg, Cu and Ga can significantly lower the melting point of Zn-Al-based alloys [16,17,18]. For example, the Zn4Al3Mg alloy (wt.%) has an approximate eutectic temperature of 343 °C, with the melting point further reduced by adding a fourth element [18,19,20].
Cui et al. [21] studied the soldering of sapphire using Zn4Al solder with ultrasonic activation. The bond between sapphire and its interlayer was formed due to the ultrasound application. To reduce the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the soldering metal, an interlayer of SiCp/A356 composites was applied, creating a sandwich structure of Zn4Al/(SiCp/A356)/Zn4Al. During coating and soldering with ultrasonic assistance, the composite matrix dissolved in the molten Zn4Al alloy. A maximum shear strength of approximately 155 MPa was achieved. Fracture morphology suggests a strong bond between the Zn4Al alloy and sapphire, with a mixed fracture mechanism shown in the shear test.
Haque et al. [22] selected a base metal consisting of zinc and aluminum. They mixed zinc, aluminum, magnesium and gallium to create a Zn4Al3Mg3Ga alloy. The substrates used were copper and silicon with a Ti/Ni/Ag coating. Soldering was performed in the temperature range of 370 to 400 °C using automated equipment for chip mounting. The ZnAlMgGa/Cu joints achieved tensile strengths ranging from 21.8 to 29.4 MPa at soldering temperatures of 370 to 400 °C.
The study by Chen et al. [23] investigated the direct soldering of SiC ceramics with ultrasonic assistance. The SiC ceramic substrates were soldered in air using a Zn8.5Al1Mg solder at a temperature of 420 °C. The tensile strength of the joints increased with extended ultrasound application time, with the highest tensile strength (148.1 MPa) achieved after 8 s of ultrasonic assistance. A new amorphous layer, 2 to 6 nm thick, was formed at the boundary between the solder and the substrate. Atoms from the eroded SiO2 layer on the SiC substrate surface rapidly diffused into the solder due to the effects of ultrasound. The strong bond between the SiC substrate and the Zn-Al-Mg solder is explained by the transfer of SiO2 into the Zn8.5Al1Mg solder, driven by cavitation erosion caused by ultrasound.
The authors’ goal [24] was to investigate the Zn-In-Mg alloy and its direct soldering with silicon and copper. This solder has a wide melting range, dependent on the indium content. Its microstructure consists of a pure Zn matrix, with MgZn2 and (In)β-In phases at the grain boundaries. The tensile strength ranges from 46 to 124 MPa, depending on indium content. The bond with silicon forms through reactions of In and Mg with the substrate. Diffraction studies revealed an In13Mg7 phase. The copper bond is not influenced by indium or magnesium, forming through the interaction between zinc and copper. Two phases, CuZn4 and Cu5Zn8, were observed. The shear strength of Cu/Zn-In-Mg/Cu joints ranges from 56 to 62 MPa, and the shear strength of Si/Zn-In-Mg/Cu joints is between 34 and 42 MPa.
The authors’ study [25] focused on direct brazing of a metal–ceramic composite (MMC) with copper substrate without flux. The brazing was carried out with Zn-type Zn10In1Mg solder. The solder joints were fabricated using power ultraction. The solder used consisted of a zinc matrix, while the solid solution (In) and the MgZn2 phase were separated at the grain boundaries. The soldered MMC joint was formed by dissolving the hli–nickel matrix in the zinc solder. This resulted in a new composite composed of a matrix pozzolanic predominantly from solid solution (Al). In addition, a solid solution (In) and a Cu3.2Zn0.7Al4.2 phase were also present. The bond with the copper substrate was formed by the interaction of Zn and Al from the solder to form two transition phases, namely Cu3.2Zn0.7Al4.2 and the unstable Al(Cu,Zn)2 phase. The average shear strength of the MMC/Cu combi-joints was 16.5 MPa.
The research in this work focused on the characterization of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder intended for high-temperature applications. The microstructure, phase composition, temperature of phase transformations and tensile strength were studied. This work explores the use of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder for ultrasonic soldering of Al2O3 ceramics and Cu substrate. The study aimed to assess the characteristics of the soldered joints through the analysis of the solder–substrate boundary. The strength of the fabricated joints was evaluated by the shear testing. This research provides a new understanding into ultrasonic soldering of ceramic/copper combinations using a Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder.

2. Experimental

The soldering alloy was prepared as follows: a thin Ti foil was dissolved in Zn in an induction oven. In a separate experiment, ZnTi2 pre-alloy and other alloys were melted in Zn using an induction oven, followed by casting into a graphite crucible without a shielding atmosphere.
The chemical composition given in Table 1 was prepared experimentally. Chemical analysis was performed using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES), also referred to as inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), an analytic technique for detecting chemical elements using a SPECTRO VI-SION EOP instrument (SPECTRO Analytical Instruments, Kleve, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany). This method is a type of emission spectrometry that utilizes inductively coupled plasma to produce excited atoms and ions, which emit electromagnetic radiation at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements.
The melting point of the soldering alloy was measured using differential thermal analysis (DTA). This analysis was performed on a DTA SETARAM Setsys 18TM instru-ment (KEP Technologies Inc., Austin, TX, USA). The DTA analyses were performed under the following conditions: Ar atmosphere (5N purity), Ar flow rate of 50 mL/min and temperature increment of 5 °C/min. These temperatures were recorded and analyzed using the SETSOFT software on a PC (version 4.2, SETARAM Instrumentation, Caluire, Rhône, France). From the resulting DTA curves, the phase transformation temperatures within the liquidus–solidus range were determined.
XRD measurements were carried out on metal sawdust derived from the cast and annealed soldering alloy samples using a PANalytical Empyrean X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Malvern PANalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK). Sawdust, rather than bulk castings, was employed to avoid the influence of casting texture on the recorded XRD patterns. The measurements were conducted in Bragg–Brentano geometry, with an angle range of θ–2θ between 20° and 145°. The XRD system was powered by a co-anodic lamp, set to 40 kV and 40 mA. The incident beam was adjusted with a 0.04 radian Soller slit, 1/4° divergence slit, 1/2° anti-scatter slit, a Fe beta filter and a PIXcel3D position-sensitive detector, operating in a 1D scanning mode. Phase identification was performed using PANalytical Xpert High Score software (version 3.0.5) with the ICSD FIZ Karlsruhe database.
The mechanical tests were conducted to determine the tensile strength of the active soldering alloy Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti. In accordance with standard experimental practice, a minimum of three test specimens per geometry were used to ensure the repeatability and reliability of the obtained data. The specimens were of standardized shape and dimensions, as shown in Figure 1, with a thickness of 4 mm.
The tensile tests were performed using a LabTest 5.250SP1-VM universal testing machine, with a controlled loading rate of 1 mm/min. During the tests, force and displacement signals were continuously recorded in real time to capture the mechanical response of the solder. The obtained force–displacement curves were analyzed, and stress–strain relationships were derived using these standard formulas:
σ = F A
ε = Δ L L 0
where σ is the stress, F is the applied force, A is the initial cross-sectional area of the specimen, ε is the strain, ΔL is the elongation and L0 is the original length of the specimen.
The accuracy of the force measurement system was ±0.5% of the full-scale load, and the displacement accuracy was ±0.02 mm. The collected data were further processed to generate stress–strain curves, which provide a more detailed understanding of the mechanical behavior of the tested solder joints.
The microstructure was assessed using a JEOL JSM 7600F scanning electron micro-scope (SEM/EDX, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with a Schottky field emission electron source operating at 20 kV and 90 µA. The specimens were positioned at a working distance of 15 mm and analyzed using a backscatter electron detector. Elemental analysis was per-formed using an Oxford Instruments X-Max silicon drift detector and an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS, Oxford Instruments plc, Abington, UK).
Soldering was performed on substrates with the following dimensions:
  • Al2O3 ceramics in disk form with diameter Φ 15 mm × 3 mm,
  • Cu material in disk form with diameter Φ 15 mm × 3 mm,
  • Cu material in cube form with dimensions 10 × 10 × 3 mm.
Figure 2a shows a schematic of the soldered joint for analyzing the solder–substrate boundaries, and the schematic for measuring shear strength is shown in Figure 2b.
Solder activation was performed using an ultrasonic device, the Hanuz UT2-ultrasonic transducer, which utilizes an oscillating piezoelectric system with a titanium sonotrode that is 3 mm in diameter. Ultrasound parameters are given in Table 2. Heating of the solder was performed on a CERAN 500 hot plate.
The soldering procedure consisted of degreasing Al2O3 and Cu substrates, which were laid on a hot plate. Heating of the hot plate was set according to the melting point of the soldering alloy used. Joints were fabricated using an active solder of type Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti, and a small amount of solder was subsequently deposited on the substrate surface.
The next step consisted of immersing the sonotrode of the soldering equipment into the molten solder for 5 s. Due to the effect of ultrasonic vibrations, the solder was activated, and the oxides in the soldering alloy were gradually disrupted and subsequently washed off of the solder surface. The prepared surfaces, along with the molten solder, were then brought together to form the bond. This joint assembly was then left to cool freely at room temperature. Figure 3 shows the schematic procedure of ultrasonic soldering.
Metallographic preparation consisted of the processes of grinding, polishing and etching the embedded specimens. The specimens were clamped in a jig for grinding, which was performed using diamond emery papers with grit sizes of 600, 1200 and 2400. During the grinding process, water was supplied to the emery paper to wash away debris. Each grinding stage with each emery paper lasted 3 min.
After grinding the specimens, the polishing process was carried out using polishing discs with diamond emulsions with particle sizes of 9 μm, 6 μm, 3 μm and 1 μm, with each emulsion applied for 10 min. After grinding and polishing of the specimens, the process of coating with carbon followed to ensure a conductive surface suitable for SEM analysis.
The special clamping fixture was used to hold the specimen, ensuring that its interface was parallel to the direction of the compressive force. The opposing parts of the fixture were inserted into a guiding tube to prevent any misalignment. Subsequently, the fixture was secured in the jaws of the testing device, and the load was applied at a closing speed of 1 mm/min until the specimen failed. After each test, the specimen was removed and replaced with a new one.
The shear strength was determined using a LabTest 5.250SP1-VM universal testing machine. To change the direction of the loading force acting on the test specimen, a jig with a specific shape was used (Figure 4). This shearing jig ensured uniform shear loading at the solder–substrate interface. Three joints were tested to measure shear strength.

3. Experimental Results

3.1. DTA Solder Analysis

The DTA analysis of the Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder is shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 and illustrates the existence of two significant transformations. The ZnAl5Mg1.5Ti1.5 alloy is comprised of four elements, with several phases identified in its structure. Titanium was observed in several modifications, primarily as the intermetallic compound TiAl3, which was initially precipitated. Subsequently, a ternary phase, known as phase T, has a constant content of titanium, while the zinc and aluminum content can vary (see Figure 8).
The intermetallic phase MgZn2 was another structural component. Additionally, a eutectoid mixture of solid solutions (Al) + (Zn) was identified, while the matrix was formed of the solid solution (Zn). The difference between the eutectic temperature obtained from the binary phase diagram of Al-Zn (361 °C) and the temperature determined by DTA analysis (342 °C) is attributed to the presence of magnesium (approximately 10 at.%) in the ternary eutectics (see Figure 8) and the EDX analysis in Table 3. The ternary eutectic was composed of a mixture of (Zn) + (Al) + (Mg), with relatively high Mg and Al contents. The presence of magnesium lowered the eutectic temperature. Figure 5 and Figure 6 suggest that the DTA analysis confirmed the existence of a reaction at approximately 380 °C, observed in both heating curve measurements.

3.2. Microstructure of the Solder Bi11Ag1Mg

For determination of the chemical composition and identification of individual phases of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder (see Figure 7), SEM/EDX analysis of spectrum 1 through 7 were performed (see Table 3). Spot 1 represents a dark section, containing 70.8 at.% Al, 24.4 at.% Ti and 4.8 at.% Zn, corresponding to the intermetallic phase TiAl3. The dark-grey area at spot 2 contained 26.5 at.% Al, 67.7 at.% Ti and 5.8 at.% Zn, which is associated with the Ti3Al phase, exhibiting a considerably wide concentration range of interactions.
The dark-grey section in spectrum 3 contained 41.0 at.% Al, 24.9 at.% Ti and 35 at.% Zn. In this case, the ternary T phase, identified as TiAl3, is relevant (see Figure 8, marked with a red circle).
The brighter grey area in spot 4 contained, on average, 32.6 at.% Mg, 2.6 at.% Al and 64.8 at.% Zn. Based on the phase diagram, this is indicative of the intermetallic phase MgZn2, which has a relatively high melting point. In this phase, approximately 2 at.% Al was dissolved.
Spectrum 5 contained, on average, 40.5 at.% Al and 59.5 at.% Zn. This corresponds to the eutectoid mixture of solid solutions (Al) + (Zn) formed by the eutectoid reaction at 277 °C, with a eutectoid concentration of 59 at.% Zn, which aligns well with the overall composition of the spot.
The bright areas in spectrum 6 contained, on average, 96.9 at.% Zn, with the balance being Al, indicating the presence of a solid solution of zinc.
The brighter grey areas in spectrum 7 contained 59.7 at.% Al, 23.8 at.% Ti and 16.5 at.% Zn. Again, this corresponds to the ternary T phase, identified as TiAl3 (see Figure 8, marked with a blue circle). The ternary phase (see Figure 8) contains approximately 25 at.% Ti, with the aluminum content varying from 15 at.% Al to 60 at.% Al. Therefore, the T phase is stable over a wide range of Al and Zn concentrations at a constant titanium content of approximately 25 at.%.
Table 3. Results from the point SEM/EDX analysis performed on the soldering alloy type Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti.
Table 3. Results from the point SEM/EDX analysis performed on the soldering alloy type Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti.
Spectrum Mg
[at. %]
Al
[at. %]
Ti
[at. %]
Zn
[at. %]
Solder Component
1-70.824.44.8intermetallic phase TiAl3
2-26.567.75.8Ti3Al phase
3-40.124.935.0T-type ternary phase TiAl3
432.62.6-64.8MgZn2 intermetallic phase
5-40.5-59.5solid solution (Al) + (Zn)
6-3.1-96.9solid solution (Zn)
7-59.723.816.5T-type ternary phase TiAl3
XRD measurements were performed using an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer on specimens prepared from the bulk solder samples. The XRD analysis confirmed the presence of intermetallic phases, namely MgZn2, Al0.86Zn0.14 and Al18Mg3Ti2. The results from the diffraction analysis are documented in Figure 9.

3.3. Tensile Strength of the Solder Alloy

The mechanical tests focused on measuring the tensile strength of the active soldering alloy type Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti. The dimensions of the test pieces were designed and calculated accordingly. Three specimens were used for tensile strength measurement of the experimental solder, with a loading rate of 1 mm/min for each specimen. For comparison, measurements were also conducted on another soldering alloy, Zn5Al1.5Mg, to evaluate the effect of elemental additions on the final strength of the experimental alloy.
The obtained results for Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti are summarized in Table 4. The minimum tensile strength was 71 MPa, while the maximum tensile strength reached 108 MPa. The average tensile strength calculated from the measured values was 89.5 MPa, and the median tensile strength was 89.5 MPa. The calculated range between the lowest and highest strength was 37 MPa. The standard deviation of the tensile strength measurements was 26.16 MPa, indicating some variation between the tested samples.
From the results of measurements shown in Figure 10, it is evident that the highest strength values were achieved for the Zn5Al1.5Mg solder without titanium addition, where the highest average tensile strength was 169.33 MPa. The results indicate that the addition of 1.5 at.% Ti to the Zn–Al–Mg soldering alloy significantly reduces the average tensile strength by nearly 45%, decreasing from 169.33 MPa (Zn5Al1.5Mg) to 89.5 MPa (Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti). This substantial decrease suggests that although Ti enhances the wettability and bonding at the interface, it negatively affects the mechanical properties of the alloy. The ductility of the test pieces for the Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti alloy varied from 0.15 to 0.29%.
These findings align with previous studies on Zn-based solder alloys, which also reported a strength reduction with Ti addition. Understanding this trade-off is crucial for optimizing the composition of advanced solder materials used in high-temperature applications, particularly in power electronics, aerospace and automotive industries, where the reliability of solder joints is critical.
Table 4. Summary of tensile strength test results for Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti.
Table 4. Summary of tensile strength test results for Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti.
Test TypeSolder TypeNumber of SamplesMin [MPa]Max [MPa]Median [MPa]Range [MPa]Standard Deviation [MPa]
Tensile StrengthZn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti37110889.53726.16

3.4. Analysis of Transition Zone Between the Joint of Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti

For the determination of chemical composition and identification of individual phases, SEM/EDX analysis was performed. The transition zone in the Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti joint (Figure 11) was analyzed in more detail. The regions from 1 to 5, as given in Table 5, were analyzed. Location 1 stoichiometrically represents the Al2O3 substrate and corresponds well to the following proportion of elements: Al:O = 2:3, or 40:60.
According to the Cu-Zn phase diagram, locations 2 and 3 undoubtedly represent the CuZn4 phase, which is slightly contaminated with aluminum oxide.
The point analysis of location 4 reveals the presence of Al2O3 from the substrate and solder (20 at.% Zn, 0.3 at.% Ti, variable content of Mg and 2.8 at.% Cu from the substrate).
The analysis of the soldering surface in location 5 indicates that the content of Mg and Al correspond to the nominal composition of the solder.
Table 5. Results from the point energy–dispersion analysis of Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti joint.
Table 5. Results from the point energy–dispersion analysis of Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti joint.
SpectrumO
[at.%]
Mg
[at.%]
Al
[at.%]
Ti
[at.%]
Cu
[at.%]
Zn
[at.%]
Solder Component
160.310.0639.55--0.08Substrate Al2O3
22.330.462.26-16.7878.17CuZn4
32.47-2.53-16.8878.11CuZn4
442.840.9631.870.382.9521.01-
523.053.448.680.212.9561.68Surface analysis
The planar distribution of elements at the boundary is documented in Figure 12. Viewing this distribution, it is obvious that magnesium significantly contributes to bond formation. The violet color indicates the presence of magnesium at the boundary.
The EDX analysis shown in Figure 13 represents the concentration profile across the boundary of the Al2O3/solder joint, covering its entire length of 30 μm. Due to the interaction between the solder and the Al2O3 substrate during soldering, an increase in Mg content occurred in a very narrow layer at the boundary, approximately 1 to 2 µm wide. A significant Mg peak is observable, indicating its segregation at the ceramic/solder boundary.

3.5. Analysis of Transition Zone Between the Soldered Joint of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5T/Cu

At the boundary of the Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu joint, an undulated boundary was formed due to the application of ultrasonic power (Figure 14). The regions 1 to 5, presented in Table 6, were analyzed.
Spectrum 1 represents the zone of the Cu substrate.
Spectrum 2 corresponds to the zone that runs parallel to the Cu/solder boundary. It is unequivocally identified as the Cu5Zn8 zone, formed by the interaction of Zn and Cu, with diffusion of Al and Mg from the solder occurring in this zone.
Spectrum 3 consists of a zone that is parallel to the solder/Cu substrate boundary, where the CuZn4 phase is also clearly present. Additionally, slight contamination with Al and O, as well as slight contamination with Mg from the solder, was observed.
Spectrum 4 is formed of eutectics or eutectoid with a high Zn content (83 at.%), along with Cu and Al (both with 3.7 at.%). The surface is slightly oxidized.
Spectrum 5 consists of a ternary phase of type T (see diagram Al-Ti-Zn above), with the cross-section surface also being slightly oxidized.
Table 6. Results from the energy–dispersion analysis of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu joint.
Table 6. Results from the energy–dispersion analysis of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu joint.
SpectrumO
[at.%]
Mg
[at.%]
Al
[at.%]
Ti
[at.%]
Cu
[at.%]
Zn
[at.%]
Solder Component
12.0300096.621.35Substrate Cu
22.450.697.72037.7851.36Cu5Zn8
31.870.442.25017.877.64CuZn4
48.80.43.7903.6883.33Eutectoid
53.98024.8821.27049.87T-type ternary phase
The distribution of individual elements across the boundary zones of the Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu joint is clearly visible in the qualitative summary map of the chemical analysis and is formed mainly of a uniformly distributed solder matrix (Zn). From Figure 15, we can observe the formation of the Cu5Zn8 and CuZn4 phases depicted in color.
The line analyses shown in Figure 16 represent the concentration profiles across the boundary of the Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu joint, over its entire length of 30 μm. The interaction of molten alloy with the Cu substrate has resulted in the partial dissolution of copper in the solder due to diffusion, leading to the formation of a new phase (Cu5Zn8) approximately 12 µm wide, and is circumscribed by the concentration profiles. Behind this, the identified CuZn4 phase appears, measuring approximately 5 µm wide.

3.6. Shear Strength of the Soldered Joints

The research in this work focused on soldering Al2O3 ceramics and Cu substrates. The aim of this study was to assess the suitability of using an active solder of the type Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti. Measurements were performed on three samples. In the case of the studied combination of Al2O3 ceramic and Cu substrate using Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder, an average strength of 10 MPa (Figure 17) was attained. Given the versatility of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder and its potential applications in technical practice, the shear testing was also extended to other ceramic materials (Al2O3, AlN, Si3N4, SiC and ZrO2) in addition to Cu.
For a more precise identification of the mechanism of bond formation, the fractured surface of the joint was analyzed. Figure 18 shows the documented fractured surface from the boundary of the Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu joint. It is obvious that the fractured surface from the side of the Al2O3 ceramics remained almost fully covered with solder. Besides that, small grains of Al2O3 can also be observed locally on the fractured surface. The fracture occurred in the solder. An analysis of planar distribution of Al, O, Cu, Mg, Zn and Ti elements on the fractured surface was also performed, and it is documented in Figure 18b–g. The planar distribution of magnesium, shown in Figure 18c, suggests that magnesium was present in the entire volume of solder/ceramics. Similarly, the distribution of titanium, shown in Figure 18e, suggests that titanium is locally surrounding the Al grains (Figure 18c), which represent the Al2O3 ceramics. This analysis has proved that Mg and Ti significantly contribute to bond formation. Zinc (Figure 18g) is uniformly distributed over the entire fracture.
XRD analysis was performed to examine the phases formed in the boundary of the Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu joint (Figure 19). The presence of the Al2O3 ceramic and Cu substrate on the fractured surface was confirmed. Additionally, solid solutions of zinc and magnesium phases, such as Mg2Zn11 and MgZn2, were observed. In addition, AlTi and MgAl2 phases were identified on the fractured surface, resulting from the interaction of molten solder with the surface of the Al2O3 ceramic substrate.

4. Conclusions

The aim of this study was to assess the active solder type Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti, intended for soldering the combination of Al2O3 ceramics and Cu substrate. To improve the wettability of the ceramic material by the Zn-Al-Mg-Ti solder, soldering with ultrasonic soldering was employed. The achieved results can be characterized as follows:
  • TG/DTA analysis was applied to determine the melting point of the solder, which was confirmed. This proved the occurrence of two transformations: namely, the eutectic and eutectoid reactions. The liquidus temperature was determined to be 380 °C.
  • The microstructure of the Zn-Al-Mg-Ti solder consisted of solid solution (Al), solid solution (Zn) and the MgZn2 phase, as evidenced by XRD analysis of the solder. The EDX analysis also revealed the presence of TiAl3 and Ti3Al phases. The ICP-AES analysis indicated the following average composition of the alloy: 95 wt. % Zn; 3.01 wt. % Al; 0.56 wt. % Ti and 1.43 wt. % Mg.
  • The tensile strength of Zn-Al-Mg-Ti soldering alloy varied from 71 to 108 MPa.
  • The bond between the ceramics and the Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder was formed as follows: owing to ultrasound activation, the particles of zinc, magnesium and titanium were distributed at the boundary with the ceramic substrate, resulting in increased surface roughening and wettability. The line EDX analysis confirmed a high magnesium content at the boundary with the Al2O3 surface. Mg layer thickness in the boundary was approximately 2 μm.
  • The joint boundary between the Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder and the Cu substrate was formed mainly of Zn and Cu elements. Magnesium at the boundary did not contribute to bond formation with the Cu substrate. The transition zone between the solder and the substrate was composed of the Cu5Zn8 and CuZn4 phases.
  • The average shear strength of the Al2O3/Cu joint fabricated using Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder was 10 MPa.
  • The research on soldering the combination of Al2O3 ceramics with the Cu substrate using Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder has proved the suitability of the selected soldering alloy for practical applications.
Future research should focus on optimizing the Ti content to achieve a balance between mechanical strength and interfacial bonding quality. Additional studies could explore the effect of alternative alloying elements, different processing conditions or post-soldering heat treatments to further enhance the performance of Zn-based solders.
Furthermore, the results of this study can be applied to the development of lead-free soldering materials for high-temperature applications, particularly in power electronics, automotive electronics and renewable energy systems, where solder joints must withstand harsh operating conditions. Understanding the trade-off between mechanical strength and interface adhesion is crucial for designing next-generation solder alloys.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.K. and T.M.; methodics, R.K.; validation, R.K., T.M. and J.D.; formal analysis, J.D., P.G. and M.P.; investigation, R.K. and T.M.; data processing, T.M.; typing—initial draft preparation, R.K.; typing—review and editing, T.M.; visualization, T.M.; supervision, R.K.; project administration, T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under contract no. APVV-21-0054 and no. APVV-17-0025. The paper was also prepared with the support of VEGA 1/0237/24: Research on active soldering alloys filled with ceramic material nanoparticles and VEGA 1/0026/23: Modification of the structure and mechanical properties of soldering alloys to increase the reliability of soldered joints in advanced electronic applications.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This contribution was elaborated on in cooperation with the Technical University Ostrava (VŠB-TU Ostrava), FMT—Faculty of Materials Science and Technology, Department of Non-ferrous Metals, Refining and Recycling. The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Mikulas Sloboda for his valuable contributions and assistance during the revision process of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zeng, G.; McDonald, S.; Nogita, K. Development of high-temperature solders: Review. Microelectron. Reliab. 2012, 52, 1306–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kroupa, A.; Andersson, D.; Hoo, N.; Pearce, J.; Watson, A.; Dinsdale, A.; Mucklejohn, S. Current Problems and Possible Solutions in High-Temperature Lead-Free Soldering. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2012, 21, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ma, H.; Suhling, J.C. A review of mechanical properties of lead-free solders for electronic packaging. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 1141–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abtew, M.; Selvaduray, G. Lead-free solders in microelectronics. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2000, 27, 95–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chidambaram, V.; Hald, J.; Hattel, J. Development of Au–Ge based candidate alloys as an alternative to high-lead content solders. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 490, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chidambaram, V.; Hattel, J.; Hald, J. Design of lead-free candidate alloys for high-temperature soldering based on the Au–Sn system. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 4638–4645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shi, Y.; Fang, W.; Xia, Z.; Lei, Y.; Guo, F.; Li, X. Investigation of rare earth-doped BiAg high-temperature solders. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2009, 21, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Song, J.-M.; Chuang, H.-Y.; Wen, T.-X. Thermal and Tensile Properties of Bi-Ag Alloys. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2007, 38, 1371–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, S.-Y.; Li, X.; Mei, Y.-H.; Lu, G.-Q. Study on high temperature bonding reliability of sintered nano-silver joint on bare copper plate. Microelectron. Reliab. 2015, 55, 2524–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sharif, A.; Gan, C.L.; Chen, Z. Transient liquid phase Ag-based solder technology for high-temperature packaging applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 587, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kang, N.; Na, H.S.; Kim, S.J.; Kang, C.Y. Alloy design of Zn–Al–Cu solder for ultra high temperatures. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 467, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rettenmayr, M.; Lambracht, P.; Kempf, B.; Tschudin, C. Zn-Al based alloys as Pb-free solders for die attach. J. Electron. Mater. 2002, 31, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, H.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, H. Effect of zirconium on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Zn–4%Al hypoeutectic alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 592, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Suganuma, K.; Kim, S.-J.; Kim, K.-S. High-temperature lead-free solders: Properties and possibilities. JOM 2009, 61, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mahmudi, R.; Eslami, M. Shear strength of the Zn–Sn high-temperature lead-free solders. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2010, 22, 1168–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kim, S.-J.; Kim, K.-S.; Kim, S.-S.; Kang, C.-Y.; Suganuma, K. Characteristics of Zn-Al-Cu Alloys for High Temperature Solder Application. Mater. Trans. 2008, 49, 1531–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Park, S.W.; Nagao, S.; Sugahara, T.; Kim, K.-S.; Suganuma, K. Retarding intermetallic compounds growth of Zn high-temperature solder and Cu substrate by trace element addition. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2013, 24, 4704–4712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, L.; Liu, Y.; Gao, H.; Gao, Z. Phase formation sequence of high-temperature Zn–4Al–3Mg solder. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2012, 24, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shimizu, T.; Ishikawa, H.; Ohnuma, I.; Ishida, K. Zn-Al-Mg-Ga alloys as Pb-free solder for die-attaching use. J. Electron. Mater. 1999, 28, 1172–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Okamoto, H.; Massalski, T.B. Alloy Phase Diagrams. In ASM Handbook; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, USA, 1992; Volume 3, p. 501. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cui, W.; Li, S.; Yan, J.; Zhang, X. Microstructure and mechanical performance of composite joints of sapphire by ultrasonic-assisted brazing. J. Mech. Work. Technol. 2018, 257, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Haque, A.; Lim, B.H.; Haseeb, A.S.M.A.; Masjuki, H.H. Die attach properties of Zn–Al–Mg–Ga based high-temperature lead-free solder on Cu lead-frame. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2011, 23, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, X.; Yan, J.; Ren, S.; Wang, Q.; Wei, J.; Fan, G. Microstructure, mechanical properties, and bonding mechanism of ultrasonic-assisted brazed joints of SiC ceramics with Zn-Al-Mg filler metals in air. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 683–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Koleňák, R.; Kostolný, I.; Kusý, M. Characterization of soldering alloy type Zn-In-Mg and the study of direct soldering of silicon and copper. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2018, 712, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Koleňák, R.; Kostolný, I.; Drápala, J.; Drienovský, M.; Sahul, M. Research on joining metal-ceramics composite Al/Al2O3 with Cu substrate using solder type Zn–In–Mg. J. Compos. Mater. 2019, 53, 1411–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, W.; Li, Z.; Shen, W.-J.; Yin, F.-C.; Liu, Y. Phase equilibria of Zn-Al-Ti ternary system at 450 and 600 °C. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2020, 30, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, S.; Su, X.; Wang, J.; Yin, F.; Li, Z.; Tu, H.; Peng, H. The Zn-rich corner of the Zn-Al-Ti system at 723 K. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 499, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Shape and dimensions of the test piece for tensile strength measurement.
Figure 1. Shape and dimensions of the test piece for tensile strength measurement.
Materials 18 01094 g001
Figure 2. Soldered joint assembly (a) for analysis of solder–substrate boundaries; (b) for shear strength measurement.
Figure 2. Soldered joint assembly (a) for analysis of solder–substrate boundaries; (b) for shear strength measurement.
Materials 18 01094 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of ultrasonic soldering.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of ultrasonic soldering.
Materials 18 01094 g003
Figure 4. Schematic representation of a jig for shear strength measurement.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of a jig for shear strength measurement.
Materials 18 01094 g004
Figure 5. DTA analysis of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder; the heating rate was 5 °C/min.
Figure 5. DTA analysis of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder; the heating rate was 5 °C/min.
Materials 18 01094 g005
Figure 6. DTA analysis of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder; the cooling rate was 5 °C/min.
Figure 6. DTA analysis of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder; the cooling rate was 5 °C/min.
Materials 18 01094 g006
Figure 7. Microstructure of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder.
Figure 7. Microstructure of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder.
Materials 18 01094 g007
Figure 8. Isothermal section of a ternary diagram of titanium–aluminum–zinc. Red point—spectrum 3, blue point—spectrum 4. Point 1—TiAl3 + Ti2Al5 + α(Al); point 2—Ti2Al5 + α(Al) + T; point 3—T + T2 + Ti3Al; point 4—T + T2 + TiZn; point 5—Ti2Al5 + TiAl2 + T; point 6—T + TiAl2 + TiAl; point 7—Ti3Al + TiAl + T; point 8—Liquid + α(Al) + T; point 9—T + TiZn8 + TiZn16; point 10—T + TiZn + TiZn8; point 11—T + TiZn16 + Liquid [26,27].
Figure 8. Isothermal section of a ternary diagram of titanium–aluminum–zinc. Red point—spectrum 3, blue point—spectrum 4. Point 1—TiAl3 + Ti2Al5 + α(Al); point 2—Ti2Al5 + α(Al) + T; point 3—T + T2 + Ti3Al; point 4—T + T2 + TiZn; point 5—Ti2Al5 + TiAl2 + T; point 6—T + TiAl2 + TiAl; point 7—Ti3Al + TiAl + T; point 8—Liquid + α(Al) + T; point 9—T + TiZn8 + TiZn16; point 10—T + TiZn + TiZn8; point 11—T + TiZn16 + Liquid [26,27].
Materials 18 01094 g008
Figure 9. XRD analysis of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder.
Figure 9. XRD analysis of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder.
Materials 18 01094 g009
Figure 10. Tensile strength of experimental soldering alloys.
Figure 10. Tensile strength of experimental soldering alloys.
Materials 18 01094 g010
Figure 11. EDX point analysis of Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti joint.
Figure 11. EDX point analysis of Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti joint.
Materials 18 01094 g011
Figure 12. Planar distribution of elements in the boundaries of Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti: (a) joint microstructure; (b) Ti; (c) O; (d) Al; (e) Zn; (f) Mg and (g) Cu.
Figure 12. Planar distribution of elements in the boundaries of Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti: (a) joint microstructure; (b) Ti; (c) O; (d) Al; (e) Zn; (f) Mg and (g) Cu.
Materials 18 01094 g012
Figure 13. The line EDX analysis of soldered joint of Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti: (a) joint microstructure; (b) Ti; (c) O; (d) Al; (e) Zn; (f) Mg and (g) Cu.
Figure 13. The line EDX analysis of soldered joint of Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti: (a) joint microstructure; (b) Ti; (c) O; (d) Al; (e) Zn; (f) Mg and (g) Cu.
Materials 18 01094 g013
Figure 14. EDX point analysis of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu joint.
Figure 14. EDX point analysis of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu joint.
Materials 18 01094 g014
Figure 15. Planar distribution of elements in the boundaries of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu joints: (a) joint microstructure; (b) O; (c) Cu; (d) Zn; (e) Mg; (f) Al and (g) Ti.
Figure 15. Planar distribution of elements in the boundaries of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu joints: (a) joint microstructure; (b) O; (c) Cu; (d) Zn; (e) Mg; (f) Al and (g) Ti.
Materials 18 01094 g015
Figure 16. Line EDX analysis of soldered joint of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu: (a) joint microstructure; (b) concentration profiles of individual elements across the boundary.
Figure 16. Line EDX analysis of soldered joint of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu: (a) joint microstructure; (b) concentration profiles of individual elements across the boundary.
Materials 18 01094 g016
Figure 17. Shear strength of soldered joints fabricated by use of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder.
Figure 17. Shear strength of soldered joints fabricated by use of Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti solder.
Materials 18 01094 g017
Figure 18. Fractured surface of Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti joint and the planar distribution of individual elements: (a) fracture morphology, (b) O, (c) Mg, (d) Al, (e) Ti, (f) Cu, (g) Zn.
Figure 18. Fractured surface of Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti joint and the planar distribution of individual elements: (a) fracture morphology, (b) O, (c) Mg, (d) Al, (e) Ti, (f) Cu, (g) Zn.
Materials 18 01094 g018
Figure 19. XRD analysis of fractured surface of Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu joint.
Figure 19. XRD analysis of fractured surface of Al2O3/Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti/Cu joint.
Materials 18 01094 g019
Table 1. Composition of Zn-Al-Mg-Ti alloy and the results of chemical analysis performed by ICP-AES method [wt. %].
Table 1. Composition of Zn-Al-Mg-Ti alloy and the results of chemical analysis performed by ICP-AES method [wt. %].
SampleCharge [wt. %]ICP-AES [wt. %]
ZnAlMg TiZnAlMgTi
Zn5Al1.5Mg1.5Ti92.051.51.5953.011.430.56
Table 2. Ultrasound parameters.
Table 2. Ultrasound parameters.
Ultrasound power[W]400
Working frequency[kHz]40
Amplitude[μm]2
Soldering temperature[°C]380
Ultrasound exposure time[s]5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koleňák, R.; Meluš, T.; Drapala, J.; Gogola, P.; Pašák, M. Study of Application of an Active Ultrasound by Use of Zn-Al-Mg-Ti-Based Solder on Selected Substrates. Materials 2025, 18, 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18051094

AMA Style

Koleňák R, Meluš T, Drapala J, Gogola P, Pašák M. Study of Application of an Active Ultrasound by Use of Zn-Al-Mg-Ti-Based Solder on Selected Substrates. Materials. 2025; 18(5):1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18051094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koleňák, Roman, Tomáš Meluš, Jaromír Drapala, Peter Gogola, and Matej Pašák. 2025. "Study of Application of an Active Ultrasound by Use of Zn-Al-Mg-Ti-Based Solder on Selected Substrates" Materials 18, no. 5: 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18051094

APA Style

Koleňák, R., Meluš, T., Drapala, J., Gogola, P., & Pašák, M. (2025). Study of Application of an Active Ultrasound by Use of Zn-Al-Mg-Ti-Based Solder on Selected Substrates. Materials, 18(5), 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18051094

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop